Over the past few decades, approximate methods that can provide solutions of sufficient accuracy have received considerable attention in the free vibration analysis of cylindrical shells, where a great deal of studies adopted the beam modal functions as the trial functions for the axial mode shapes of cylindrical shells. Nevertheless, most studies were restricted to the application of single term beam modal function and failed to simulate elastic boundary conditions of cylindrical shells, while the accuracy of the corresponding methods has recently sparked significant controversy, especially for cylindrical shells under the clamped-free boundary condition. This paper presents a comparative study of three forms of beam modal functions in the free vibration analysis of cylindrical shells, one of which is proposed for the first time to simulate elastic boundary conditions of cylindrical shells. A unified model is developed using the general Rayleigh–Ritz method, incorporating the breathing modes with circumferential orders being zero, and four types of commonly used thin shell theories, namely the Donnell, Reissner, Love, and Sanders theories. From both perspectives of natural frequencies and mode shapes, numerical results are validated by comparison with those existing in the literature and those calculated from the finite element method (FEM). The results not only clarify the distinction of different forms of beam modal functions used in the Rayleigh-Ritz method, but also provide explanations for the controversy raised in recent studies. Furthermore, the unified formulations can be extended to vibration analysis of various forms of shell structures, and can also be helpful to the vibration analysis of beams and plates with elastic boundary conditions.
Read full abstract