Appropriateness Of Initial Antibiotic Therapy Research Articles

Usefulness of Early C-Reactive Protein Kinetics in Response and Prognostic Assessment in Infected Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Retrospective Study.

The ideal biomarker to assess response and prognostic assessment in the infected critically ill patient is still not available.The aims of our study were to analyze the association between early C-reactive protein kinetics and duration and appropriatenessof antibiotic therapy and its usefulness in predicting mortality in infected critically ill patients. We have carried out an observational retrospective study in a cohort of 60 patients with community-acquiredpneumonia, aspiration pneumonia and bacteremia at an intensive care unit. We have collected C-reactive protein consecutive serumlevels for eight days as well as duration and appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy. C-reactive protein kinetic groups were definedbased on the levels at days 0, 4 and 7. With a follow-up of one year, we have evaluated mortality at different time-points. We have obtained three different C-reactive protein kinetic groups from the sample: fast response, delayed but fast responseand delayed and slow response. We did not find statistically significant associations between C-reactive protein kinetics and early (intensivecare unit, hospital and 28-days) or late (six months and one year) mortality and antibiotic therapy duration (p > 0.05). Althoughthere were no statistically significant differences between the appropriateness of antibiotic therapy and the defined groups (p = 0.265),no patient with inappropriate antibiotic therapy presented a fast response pattern. Several studies suggest the importance of this protein in infection. Early C-reactive protein kinetics is not associated with response and prognostic assessment in infected critically ill patients.Nevertheless, a fast response pattern tends to exclude initial inappropriate antibiotic therapy.

Carbapenem Resistance, Initial Antibiotic Therapy, and Mortality in Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteremia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND Mortality associated with infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is higher than mortality due to carbapenem-sensitive pathogens. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between mortality from bacteremia caused by carbapenem-resistant (CRKP) and carbapenem-sensitive Klebsiella pneumoniae (CSKP) and to assess the impact of appropriate initial antibiotic therapy (IAT) on mortality. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Wiley Cochrane databases through August 31, 2016, for observational studies reporting mortality among adult patients with CRKP and CSKP bacteremia. Search terms were related to Klebsiella, carbapenem-resistance, and infection. Studies including fewer than 10 patients per group were excluded. A random-effects model and meta-regression were used to assess the relationship between carbapenem-resistance, appropriateness of IAT, and mortality. RESULTS Mortality was higher in patients who had CRKP bacteremia than in patients with CSKP bacteremia (15 studies; 1,019 CRKP and 1,148 CSKP patients; unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-2.6; I2=0). Mortality was lower in patients with appropriate IAT than in those without appropriate IAT (7 studies; 658 patients; unadjusted OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8; I2=36%). CRKP patients (11 studies; 1,326 patients; 8-year period) were consistently less likely to receive appropriate IAT (unadjusted OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.7; I2=43%). Our meta-regression analysis identified a significant association between the difference in appropriate IAT and mortality (OR per 10% difference in IAT, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.6). CONCLUSIONS Appropriateness of IAT is an important contributor to the observed difference in mortality between patients with CRKP bacteremia and patients with CSKP bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1319-1328.

Infectious Diseases Team for the Early Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock in the Emergency Department.

The impact on patient survival of an infectious disease (ID) team dedicated to the early management of severe sepsis/septic shock (SS/SS) in Emergency Department (ED) has yet to be assessed. A quasiexperimental pre-post study was performed at the general ED of our hospital. During the pre phase (June 2013-July 2014), all consecutive adult patients with SS/SS were managed according to the standard of care, data were prospectively collected. During the post phase (August 2014-October 2015), patients were managed in collaboration with a dedicated ID team performing a bedside patient evaluation within 1 hour of ED arrival. Overall, 382 patients were included, 195 in the pre phase and 187 in the post phase. Median age was 82 years (interquartile range, 70-88). The most common infection sources were lung (43%) and urinary tract (17%); in 22% of cases, infection source remained unknown. During the post phase, overall compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) bundle and appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy improved from 4.6% to 32% (P < .001) and from 30% to 79% (P < .001), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that predictors of all-cause 14-day mortality were quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment ≥2 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.45; P = .007), serum lactate ≥2 mmol/L (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.39-3.25; P < .001), and unknown infection source (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.42-3.02; P < .001); being attended during the post phase was a protective factor (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.94; P = .026). Implementation of an ID team for the early management of SS/SS in the ED improved the adherence to SSC recommendations and patient survival.

Implementing a collaborative sepsis protocol on the time to antibiotics in an emergency department of a saudi hospital: quasi randomized study.

Background. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of an ED sepsis protocol on the time to antibiotics for emergency department (ED) patients with severe sepsis. Methods. Quasiexperimental prospective study was conducted at the emergency department. Consecutive patients with severe sepsis were included before and after the implementation of a sepsis protocol. The outcome measures were time from recognition of severe sepsis/septic shock to first antibiotic dose delivery and the appropriateness of initial choice of antibiotics based on the presumed source of infection. Results. There were 47 patients in preintervention group and 112 patients in postintervention group. Before implementation, mean time from severe sepsis recognition to delivery of antibiotics was 140 ± 97 minutes. During the intervention period, the mean time was 68 ± 67 minutes, with an overall reduction of 72 minutes. The protocol resulted in an overall improvement of 37% in the compliance, as 62% received appropriate initial antibiotics for the presumed source of infection as compared to 25% before the start of protocol. Conclusion. Implementation of ED sepsis protocol improved the time from recognition of severe sepsis/septic shock to first antibiotic dose delivery as well as the appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy.

Timing and appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy in newly presenting septic patients

ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of antibiotic regimens and time to antibiotics in septic patients admitted to an intensive care unit from the emergency department. MethodsA retrospective case-control study of patients with sepsis syndromes admitted from the emergency department between August 2010 and July 2011 was conducted. Standard demographic information, time frames for written antibiotic orders and administration, and information regarding site of culture, organisms identified, sensitivities, and antibiotic effectiveness were documented. ResultsFour hundred medical records were reviewed; 184 patients met the study inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Simplified Acute Physiology Scores II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were 49 and 6, respectively, and overall in-hospital mortality was 20.7%. Patients with positive blood cultures had higher Simplified Acute Physiology Scores II scores (56.0 vs 46.0, P = .0125). Serum lactate levels were also significantly higher in the in-hospital mortality group (3.2 vs 2.1, P = .0068). Computerized physician order entry dramatically decreased the median times to the last appropriate antibiotic administration (3.183 hours vs 6.992 hours, P < .0001) but did not alter mortality (20.6% vs 20.8%). Appropriateness of empiric antibiotic regimens was similar between patients surviving and those who died during their hospital stay (63.5% vs 68.8%, P = .58). ConclusionsMedian times to the first antibiotic administration and last needed appropriate antibiotic administration were less than 3 and 5 hours, respectively; these times were similar between patients who survived and those who died during their hospital stay. Patients with a serum lactate level higher than 2.5 mmol/L were associated with a 2.5-times increased risk of mortality.

Factors influencing the implementation of antibiotic de-escalation and impact of this strategy in critically ill patients

IntroductionA rational use of antibiotics is of paramount importance in order to prevent the emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria that can lead to therapeutic impasse, especially in intensive care units (ICUs). A de-escalation strategy is therefore naturally advocated as part of better antibiotics usage. However, the clinical impact of such a strategy has not been widely studied. We aimed to assess the feasibility and the clinical impact of a de-escalation strategy in a medical ICU and to identify factors associated when de-escalation was possible.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of patients hospitalized in a medical ICU over a period of six months. Independent factors associated with de-escalation and its clinical impact were assessed.ResultsTwo hundred and twenty-nine patients were included in the study. Antibiotics were de-escalated in 117 patients (51%). The appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy was the only independent factor associated with the performance of de-escalation (OR = 2.9, 95% CI, 1.5-5.7; P = 0.002). By contrast, inadequacy of initial antibiotic therapy (OR = 0.1, 0.0 to 0.1, P <0.001) and the presence of multidrug resistant bacteria (OR = 0.2, 0.1 to 0.7, P = 0.006) prevented from de-escalation. There were no differences in terms of short (ICU) or long-term (at 1 year) mortality rates or any secondary criteria such as ICU length of stay, duration of antibiotic therapy, mechanical ventilation, incidence of ICU-acquired infection, or multi-drug resistant bacteria emergence.ConclusionsDe-escalation appears feasible in most cases without any obvious negative clinical impact in a medical ICU.

Effect of an emergency department sepsis protocol on time to antibiotics in severe sepsis

We sought to evaluate the time to antibiotics for emergency department (ED) patients meeting criteria for severe sepsis before and after the implementation of an ED sepsis protocol. Compliance with published guidelines for time to antibiotics and initial empiric therapy in sepsis was also assessed. A retrospective chart review was conducted. Emergency department patient encounters with International Classification of Diseases codes related to severe infections were screened during a 3-month period before and after the implementation of a sepsis protocol. Encounters meeting criteria for severe sepsis were further assessed. The time to initiation of antibiotics was determined as well as the initial choice of antimicrobial therapy based on the presumed source of infection. We reviewed 213 unique ED patient encounters meeting criteria for severe sepsis. Analysis of the period before implementation showed a median time from the time criteria for severe sepsis were met to delivery of antibiotics of 163 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI] 124 to 210 min). Analysis of the period after implementation of the protocol revealed a median time of 79 minutes (95% CI 64 to 94 min), representing an overall reduction of 84 minutes (95% CI 42 to 126 min). Before the implementation of the protocol, 47% of patients received correct antibiotic coverage for the presumed source of infection in compliance with locally published guidelines. After the initiation of the protocol, 73% received appropriate initial antibiotics, for an overall improvement of 26%. A guideline-based ED sepsis protocol for the evaluation and treatment of the septic patient appears to improve the time to administration of antibiotics as well as the appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy in patients with severe sepsis.

Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Impact of Organisms on Clinical Resolution and Medical Resources Utilization

Clinical resolution of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) determines the duration of treatment and mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of organisms and their susceptibility to treatment on outcomes. Prospective observational study in three teaching ICUs. Sixty episodes of VAP with appropriate therapy (Haemophilus influenzae, 15 episodes; methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus [MSSA], 15 episodes; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 15 episodes; and methicillin-resistant S aureus [MRSA], 15 episodes), and 30 episodes with initial inappropriate therapy, all due to P aeruginosa, were compared. The main outcome measures were clinical resolution variables and, in survivors, length of mechanical ventilation after VAP onset. A significant delay in the resolution of hypoxemia was observed in VAP episodes due to MRSA and P aeruginosa with inappropriate antibiotic therapy (IAT) (median time to resolution, 10 and 8 days, respectively) when compared with the remaining pathogens (median time to resolution, 2 days). A multiple regression model, adjusted for disease severity, confirmed the delayed clinical resolution for MRSA and P aeruginosa with IAT. Similar associations were documented for defervescence. Among survivors, the median duration of mechanical ventilation after VAP onset was significantly longer for MRSA (17 days) and P aeruginosa IAT (11 days) when compared with episodes due to H influenzae or MSSA (6 days). Multiple regression analysis, adjusted for disease severity, confirmed that MRSA required significantly (R(2) = 0.132; p < 0.01) longer respiratory support than other organisms. When treated promptly, the resolution of VAP due to MSSA, H influenzae, and P aeruginosa was comparable. The resolution of MRSA VAP, regardless of the appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy, was associated with longer respiratory support.

Impact of appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy on outcome of postoperative pneumonia

Although delay in the administration of appropriate antibiotic treatment for ventilator-associated or community-acquired pneumonia is associated with increased hospital mortality, impact of appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy on outcome of postoperative pneumonia has been poorly investigated. Of 7,275 patients who had undergone intraabdominal surgery under general anesthesia between January 1998 and December 2005, we compiled a list of 101 patients with microbiologically confirmed postoperative pneumonia. We analyzed the influence of the appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy on outcome of postoperative pneumonia using logistic regression analysis. Among the patients with postoperative pneumonia, about a half received inadequate initial antimicrobial therapy. As well as the presence of concomitant intraabdominal abscess [odds ratio (OR) = 28.83), prolonged duration of anesthesia at surgery (OR = 22.41), and the isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (OR = 8.86), inadequate initial antibiotic therapy was a determinant of death from postoperative pneumonia (OR = 16.75). The outcomes of patients with postoperative pneumonia could be improved by avoiding concomitant intraabdominal abscess, reducing surgical insult, and administering appropriate antimicrobial agents.

Impact of appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy on the outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

To evaluate the impact of appropriate initial antibiotic therapy (AB) on the outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Retrospective study (1992-97). Episodes of VAP diagnosed on both clinical and microbiological criteria after > or = 48 h of mechanical ventilation (MV). Initial AB was considered appropriate when all significant organisms were susceptible to at least one of the antibiotics started after distal bronchial sampling. Antibiotic treatment was modified within 48 h when susceptibility testing was available. Outcome was recorded at the ICU and hospital discharge. One hundred and eleven patients were included (SAPS II = 48 +/- 18, age = 62 +/- 14 years, mean duration of MV before VAP = 12 +/- 9 days). Initial AB was appropriate in 55 patients (49.5%). No difference between appropriate initial AB and inappropriate initial AB was found concerning severity indices at the time of VAP diagnosis. ICU length of stay was shorter with appropriate initial AB than with inappropriate initial AB for survivors (12 +/- 11 days vs 20 +/- 24 days, P = 0.01). Crude hospital mortality tended to be lower with appropriate initial AB than with inappropriate initial AB (47.3% vs 60.7%, odds ratio = 1.72, 95% CI = 0.81-3.7). Relative crude mortality reduction with appropriate initial AB was 22%, 95% CI = -10% to 45%. Inappropriate initial AB of VAP during the first 48 h increased ICU length of stay after VAP diagnosis and tended to increase crude hospital mortality despite equal severity of illness at the time of VAP diagnosis, when compared to appropriate initial AB in a population of 111 ICU patients.