Approach-related Complications Research Articles

Extended Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Giant Pediatric Craniopharyngiomas: Technical Note and Case Series.

Giant pediatric craniopharyngiomas are rare tumors whose clinical and surgical management is extremely challenging. A variety of open transcranial approaches has been used to resect these lesions. Although there has been an increasing acceptance of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for the resection of pediatric craniopharyngiomas in recent years, many surgeons continue to recommend against the use of the EEA for giant pediatric craniopharyngiomas. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of extended EEA for giant craniopharyngiomas in the pediatric population. All consecutive pediatric patients with giant craniopharyngiomas (diameter >4 cm) who underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Data on demographic information, preoperative assessment, imaging features, surgical results, complications, and recurrences were recorded and analyzed. A total of 16 pediatric patients with an average age of 12 years were identified. The mean maximum diameter and volume of the tumors were 4.35 cm and 24.1 cm3, respectively. Gross total resection was achieved in 13 patients (81.3%) and subtotal resection in 3 patients (18.7%). Postoperatively, partial or complete anterior pituitary insufficiency occurred in 100% of patients, and 62.5% developed new-onset diabetes insipidus. Visual function improved in 9 patients (56.3%) and remained stable in 7 patients (43.7%). Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 2 patients and was successfully repaired through the EEA. During a mean follow-up of 44.3 months, 18.8% of patients had a >9% increase in body mass index, and 93.8% of patients successfully returned to school or work. Two patients (12.5%) suffered a recurrence. Disease control was achieved in 16 patients (100%) at final follow-up. The extended EEA allows adequate access to this challenging tumor and enables complete resection and visual improvement with a reasonable approach-related complication rate.

Removals and Revisions of Cervical Total Disc Replacement Devices in a Consecutive Series of 1,626 Patients Beginning with the First Case Experience in 2003.

Retrospective cohort study. The purpose of this study was to investigate the rate of cervical total disc replacement (TDR) device removal or revision. Cervical TDR has gained acceptance as an alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in appropriately selected patients. There have been concerns over device safety, one measure of which is subsequent surgery related to device problems. A consecutive series of 1,626 cervical TDR patients from 2003 to June 2021 were included, consisting of TDRs up to 3 levels and hybrids (TDR and fusion). TDR removal or revision surgeries and reasons for these surgeries, procedures performed, and duration from index procedure were recorded. Data were analyzed to determine removal/revision rate and factors possibly related to these events. There were 24 removals/revisions (1.48%) in the 1,626 patients. Removal was performed in 23 cases (1.41%) and revision in 1 (0.06%). Among removal cases, ACDF was performed in 18 and TDR was replaced with another TDR in 5. Removals with fusion included 5 cases of osteolysis with/without C. acnes, 4 device displacement/migration, 4 posterior spinal pathology, and one for each of the following: metal allergy, approach-related complications, malpositioning, subsidence, and hypermobility. The revision involved TDR repositioning 3 days after index surgery. There were 66 patients for whom minimum of 10year follow-up was confirmed, and none had removal/revision surgery 10 or more years after index surgery. There was no relationship between occurrence of removal/revision and age, gender, body mass index, or physician experience (learning curve). The removal/revision rate was significantly higher in FDA trials vs. post-approval (4.1% vs. 1.3%, P<0.05). In this large consecutive series of patients, 1.48% of cervical TDRs were removed/revised. The low rate of removals/revisions over a long period of time provides support for the devices' safety.

The endaural subtemporal keyhole: a novel minimally invasive approach to the middle cranial fossa.

The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a minimally invasive approach to the middle cranial fossa using a novel endaural keyhole. The charts of all patients who underwent this novel minimally invasive approach to the middle cranial fossa were retrospectively reviewed. In addition, cadaveric dissection was performed to demonstrate the feasibility of the endaural keyhole to the middle cranial fossa. Six patients (5 female and 1 male; age range 47-77 years) who underwent craniotomy for CSF leak (n = 3), intracerebral hematoma evacuation (n = 2), and tumor resection (n = 1) via the endaural subtemporal approach were identified. There were no approach-related complications noted. Representative imaging from cadaveric dissection is provided with a stepwise discussion of the procedure. The endaural subtemporal keyhole craniotomy provides a novel approach to middle fossa skull base pathology, as well as a minimally invasive approach to intra-axial pathology of the temporal lobe and basal ganglia. Further research is needed to establish the limitations and potential complications of this novel approach.

Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Debridement and Decompression for Brucellar Thoracic Spinal Epidural Abscess: A Minimally Invasive Alternative to Open Surgery.

Thoracic spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare but dangerous condition, and traditional surgical methods are accompanied by extensive trauma and approach-related complications. Here we introduce the technique of full-endoscopic transforaminal debridement and decompression and evaluate its feasibility for treating brucellar thoracic SEA. We performed thoracic full-endoscopic transforaminal decompression and debridement on two patients with neurological deficits caused by brucellar SEA, which is mainly composed of granulation tissue rather than pus. Postoperative MRI was conducted to confirm the presence of any residual abscess compressing the nerves. Frankel grading was employed to assess the recovery of neurological function, and complications were documented. There were no occurrences of dural tear, postoperative hematoma, or pulmonary complications. Their neurological function had significantly improved after surgery, and postoperative MRI confirmed no residual abscess compressing the spinal cord. During the 2-year follow-up, one patient achieved complete recovery (from Frankel-C to Frankel-E), while another patient improved from Frankel-A to Frankel-D. Neither patient experienced infection recurrence, instability, nor kyphotic deformity. We described the novel application of transforaminal endoscopic surgery in brucellar thoracic granulomatous SEA and preliminarily indicated the feasibility of this technique as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery.

The lateral transorbital approach to the medial sphenoid wing, anterior clinoid, middle fossa, cavernous sinus, and Meckel's cave: target-based classification, approach-related complications, and intermediate-term ocular outcomes.

The lateral transorbital approach (LTOA) is a relatively new minimal access skull base approach suited for addressing paramedian pathology of the anterior and middle fossa. The authors define target zones for this approach and describe a series of cases with detailed measurements of visual outcomes, including those obtained with exophthalmometry. The authors performed a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of LTOA patients. Seven target zones were identified: 1) the orbit, 2) the lesser sphenoid wing and anterior clinoid, 3) the middle fossa, 4) the lateral wall of the cavernous sinus and Meckel's cave, 5) the infratemporal fossa, 6) the petrous apex, and 7) the anterior fossa. The authors used volumetric analyses of preoperative and postoperative MR and CT imaging data to calculate the volume of bone and tumor removed and to provide detailed ophthalmological, neurological, and cosmetic outcomes. Of the 20 patients in this cohort, pathology was in zone 2 (n = 10), zone 4 (n = 6), zone 3 (n = 2), zone 1 (n = 1), and zone 5 (n = 1). Pathology was meningioma (n = 10), schwannoma (n = 2), metastasis (n = 2), epidermoid (n = 1), dermoid (n = 1), encephalocele (n = 1), adenoma (n = 1), glioblastoma (n = 1), and inflammatory lesion (n = 1). The goal was gross-total resection (GTR) in 9 patients, all of whom achieved GTR. Subtotal resection (STR) was the goal in 8 patients (5 spheno-orbital meningiomas, 1 giant cavernous sinus/Meckel's cave schwannoma, 1 cavernous sinus prolactinoma, and 1 cavernous sinus dermoid), 7 of whom achieved STR and 1 of whom achieved GTR. The goal was biopsy in 2 patient and repair of encephalocele in 1. Visual acuity was stable or improved in 18 patients and worse in 2. Transient early postoperative diplopia, ptosis, eyelid swelling, and peri-orbital numbness were common. All 9 patients with preoperative diplopia improved at their last follow-up. Seven of 8 patients with preoperative exophthalmos improved after surgery (average correction of 64%). There were no cases of clinically significant (> 2 mm) postoperative enophthalmos. The most frequent postoperative complaint was peri-orbital numbness (40%). There was 1 CSF leak. Most patients were satisfied with their ocular (84%-100% of patients provided positive satisfaction-related responses) and cosmetic (75%-100%) outcomes. The LTOA is a safe minimal access approach to a variety of paramedian anterior skull base pathologies in several locations. Early follow-up revealed excellent resolution of exophthalmos with little risk of clinically significant enophthalmos. Transient diplopia, ptosis, and peri-orbital numbness were common but improved. Careful case selection is critical to ensure good outcome.

Lumbar lateral interbody fusion: step-by-step surgical technique and clinical experience.

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a minimally invasive surgical approach used to treat a variety of degenerative and deformity conditions of the lumbar spine such as advanced degenerative disease, degenerative scoliosis, foraminal and central stenosis. It has emerged as an alternative to the traditional posterior and anterior lumbar approaches with some potential benefits such as lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay. In this article, we provide our single institutional surgical experience including main indications and contraindications, a step-by-step surgical technique description, a detailed preoperative imaging assessment with a focus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) psoas anatomy, operative room (OR) setup and patient positioning. A descriptive surgical technical note of the following steps is provided: positioning and fluoroscopic confirmation, incision and intraoperative level confirmation, discectomy and endplate preparation, implant size selection and insertion and final fluoroscopic control, hemostasis check and wound closure along with an instructional surgical video with tips and pearls, postoperative patient care recommendations, common approach-related complications, along with our historical clinical institutional group experience. Finally, we summarize our research experience in this surgical approach with a focus on LLIF as a standalone procedure. Based on our experience, LLIF can be considered an effective surgical technique to treat degenerative lumbar spine conditions. Proper patient selection is mandatory to achieve good outcomes. Our institutional experience shows higher fusion rates with good clinical outcomes and a relatively low rate of complications.

Telovelar versus Transvermian Approach in Management of Patients with Fourth Ventricular Tumors

Background Approaching the fourth ventricle surgically is particularly challenging due to the limited working space provided by the important surrounding cerebrovascular structures. Its close relationship to the surrounding neural structures, including the brainstem and cerebellum, is the major limitation for surgical access. Various surgical routes to the fourth ventricular space will be described in the literature, including the conventional transvermian approach. Recent clinical and anatomical studies have suggested that the telovelar approach will maximize the extent of surgical exposure and working angle while minimizing operative morbidity. Objectives Our primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy and outcome of each approach in handling tumors within different parts of 4th ventricle. Our secondary objective is to analyze approach related complication and limitations of application to find best surgical option for those patients with posterior fossa lesions. Methods The following electronic databases will be searched from 2000 to 2019: PubMed, Google scholar, Cocharne database of systematic reviews, EMBASE and Science direct using Keywords ''Telovelar approach'', ''Transvermian approach'', ''fourth ventricular tumours'', ''Medullary velum''. Studies will be eligible if they contain the target Keywords in title or abstract, addressing our subject. Afterwards the full text of the article will be reviewed to exclude full texts not fulfilling the criteria or deviating from the initial impression taken from the title/abstract reviewing. References\ bibliography of the selected article will be sorted by discussion between study team (Student, Director and Codirectors). Results A total of 130 study were screened for eligibility, 6 studies were included in our systematic review for comparing the Telovelar and Transvermian approach in reaching posterior fossa lesions located within 4th ventricle regarding efficacy, clinical outcome and improvement, safety and complication. It was found that each approach has its own merits and demerits with nearly no difference between them regarding efficacy and safety, however slight superiority was linked to Telovelar approach in minimizing post-operative posterior fossa syndrome and Hydrocephalic changes. Conclusion we concluded that, Both transvermian -without sustained retraction- and telovelar approaches have no significant difference in safety, feasibility of total tumor excision, clinical outcome, postoperative complications and cerebellar mutism. The choice of either approach depends mainly on the surgeon's skills and preference, However the telovelar approach is generally preferred.

Complications of the Superior Eyelid Endoscopic Transorbital Approach to the Skull Base: Preliminary Experience With Specific Focus on Orbital Outcome.

The endoscopic superior eyelid approach is a relatively novel mini-invasive technique that is currently investigating for skull base cancers. However, questions remain regarding specific approach-related complications when treating different skull base tumors. This study aims to analyze any surgical complications that occurred in our preliminary consecutive experience, with specific focus on orbital outcome. A retrospective and consecutive cohort of patients treated via a superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach at the Division of Neurosurgery of the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona was analyzed. Patients features were described in detail. Complications were divided into 2 groups to analyze separately the approach-related complications, and those resulting from tumor removal. The ocular complications were subdivided into early ocular status (<3 weeks), late ocular status (3-8 weeks), and persistent ocular complications. The "Park questionnaire" was used to determine patient's satisfaction related to the transorbital approach. A total of 20 patients (5 spheno-orbital meningiomas, 1 intradiploic Meningioma, 2 intraconal lesions, 1 temporal pole lesion, 2 trigeminal schwannoma, 3 cavernous sinus lesions, and 6 petroclival lesions) were included in the period 2017-2022. Regarding early ocular status, upper eyelid edema was detected in all cases (100%) associated with diplopia in the lateral gaze in 30% of cases, and periorbital edema in 15% of cases. These aspects tend to resolve at late ocular follow-up (3-8 weeks) in most cases. Regarding persistent ocular complications, in one case of intraconal lesion, a limitation of eye abduction was detected (5%). In another patient with intraconal lesion, an ocular neuropathic pain was reported (5%). In 2 cases of petroclival menigioma, who were also treated with a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt, slight enophthalmus was observed as a persistent complication (10%). According to the Park questionnaire, no cosmetic complaints, no head pain, no palpable cranial irregularities, and no limited mouth opening were reported, and an average of 89% of general satisfaction was encountered. The superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach is a safe and satisfactory technique for a diversity of skull base tumors. At late follow-up, upper eyelid edema, diplopia, and periorbital edema tend to resolve. Persistent ocular complications are more frequent after treating intraconal lesions. Enophthalmus may occur in patients with associated ventriculo-peritoneal shunt. According to patient's satisfaction, fairly acceptable results are attained.

A modified oblique lumbar interbody fusion: A better way to establish an exposure under direct microscopic vision.

This is a retrospective study. To demonstrate a modified oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OILF) technique for L1-L5. The modified technique splits anterior portion of psoas belly to access the oblique corridor (OC) anteroinferior to psoas, minimizing psoas manipulation and retraction and avoiding nerve injury while offering excellent microscopic visualization. Psoas weakness and neurovascular complication rates in patients treated with traditional OLIF (T-OLIF) or anteroinferior psoas OLIF (AP-OLIF) were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcomes were also reviewed. A total of 162 cases treated with T-OLIF (n = 73) and AP-OLIF (n = 89) for degenerative lumbar disease were included. The mean operative time and blood loss were less with AP-OLIF (P < 0.01). Approach related complications were 14 (19.1%) with T-OLIF and 4 (4.5%) with AP-OLIF. Postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores improved in both T-OIF and AP-OIF groups (P < 0.01). The modified OLIF technique (AP-OLIF) is characterized by an easy exposure of the lumbar spine under direct microscopic vision, resulting in less psoas weakness and neurovascular injury.

Excision of a Superior Ramus Osteochondroma Through the Modified Stoppa Approach

Excision of a Superior Ramus Osteochondroma Through the Modified Stoppa Approach

Size of Craniectomy Predicts Approach-Related Shear Bleeding in Poor-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Decompressive craniectomy is an option to decrease elevated intracranial pressure in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients. The aim of the present study was to analyze the size of the bone flap according to approach-related complications in patients with poor-grade SAH. We retrospectively analyzed poor-grade SAH patients (WFNS 4 and 5) who underwent aneurysm clipping and craniectomy (DC or ommitance of bone flap reinsertion). Postoperative CT scans were analyzed for approach-related tissue injury at the margin of the craniectomy (shear bleeding). The size of the bone flap was calculated using the De Bonis equation. Between 01/2012 and 01/2020, 67 poor-grade SAH patients underwent clipping and craniectomy at our institution. We found 14 patients with new shear bleeding lesion in postoperative CT scan. In patients with shear bleeding, the size of the bone flap was significantly smaller compared to patients without shear bleeding (102.1 ± 45.2 cm2 vs. 150.8 ± 37.43 cm2, p > 0.0001). However, we found no difference in mortality rates (10/14 vs. 23/53, p = 0.07) or number of implanted VP shunts (2/14 vs. 18/53, p = 0.2). We found no difference regarding modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 6 months postoperatively. In poor-grade aneurysmal SAH, the initial planning of DC-if deemed necessary -and enlargement of the flap size seems to decrease the rate of postoperatively developed shear bleeding lesions.

Complications in cervical total disc arthroplasty

Cervical total disc arthroplasty (CTDA) is an alternative to cervical fusion when addressing single level cervical disc disease and attempts to restore normal disc height and preserve motion, theoretically decreasing rates of adjacent segment disease (ASD) and symptomatic pseudoarthrosis. Although safe and effective, CTDA has a unique complication profile particularly in regard to long-term complications. Approach related complications are similar to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and include injury to surrounding vascular, digestive, and neurologic structures. To achieve anatomic positioning, CTDA requires vertebral endplate cartilage removal and osseous preparation which can lead to endplate fracture, salvage fusion, or component malpositioning. Long term complications include heterotopic ossification (HO), implant subsidence, ASD requiring surgical intervention, and implant migration or translation. Although HO reduces motion at the prosthesis site, it does not appear to worsen clinical outcomes in most cases. Evidence is still conflicting regarding ASD when comparing ACDF to CTDA, however, the most recent evidence suggests a lower rate of development with CTDA.

Comparison of oblique and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: An updated meta-analysis.

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) are widely used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. A meta-analysis was performed to examine the clinical and radiological effects of these two techniques. A search of relevant literature from several databases was conducted until November 2021. Perioperative outcomes, clinical and radiological results, and complications were analyzed. Fifteen qualified studies were included. OLIF showed a shorter operative time and length of hospital stay and less blood loss than TLIF. Early postoperative Visual Analogue Scale for back pain were significantly lower in OLIF than in TLIF (P = 0.004). Noteworthy, although the preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) of the OLIF group was higher than that of the TLIF group (P = 0.04), the postoperative ODI was significantly lower (P < 0.05). Radiologically, the results showed that the disc and foraminal heights of OLIF were significantly higher than those of TLIF postoperatively. Moreover, OLIF can restore more segmental lordosis than TLIF in the early postoperative period. Furthermore, OLIF showed better fusion rates than TLIF (P = 0.02), with no difference in cage subsidence (13.4% vs. 16.6%). No significant differences in overall and approach-related complications between the two groups. The OLIF group showed an advantage in terms of operative time, hospitalization, intraoperative blood loss, early back pain relief, postoperative function recovery, disc and foraminal heights, early segmental lordosis, and fusion rate compared to TLIF. For both procedures, the incidence rates of overall and approach-related complications were comparable.

Surgical morbidity of the extradural anterior petrosal approach: the Lariboisière experience.

Concerns about the approach-related morbidity of the extradural anterior petrosal approach (EAPA) have been raised, especially regarding temporal lobe and venous injuries, hearing impairment, facial nerve palsy, cerebrospinal fluid fistula, and seizures. There is lack in the literature of studies with detailed analysis of surgical complications. The authors have presented a large series of patients who were treated with EAPA, focusing on complications and their avoidance. The authors carried out a retrospective review of patients who underwent EAPA at their institution between 2012 and 2021. They collected preoperative clinical characteristics, operative reports, operative videos, findings on neuroimaging, histological diagnosis, postoperative course, and clinical status at last follow-up. For pathologies without petrous bone invasion, the amount of petrous apex drilling was calculated and classified as low (< 70% of the volume) or high (≥ 70%). Complications were dichotomized as approach related and resection related. This study included 49 patients: 26 with meningiomas, 10 brainstem cavernomas, 4 chondrosarcomas, 4 chordomas, 2 schwannomas, 1 epidermoid cyst, 1 cholesterol granuloma, and 1 osteoblastoma. The most common approach-related complications were temporal lobe injury (6.1% of patients), seizures (6.1%), pseudomeningocele (6.1%), hearing impairment (4.1%), and dry eye (4.1%). Approach-related complications occurred most commonly in patients with a meningioma (p = 0.02) and Meckel's cave invasion (p = 0.02). Gross-total or near-total resection was correlated with a higher rate of tumor resection-related complications (p = 0.02) but not approach-related complications (p = 0.76). Inferior, lateral, and superior tumoral extension were not correlated with a higher rate of tumor resection-related complications. No correlation was found between high amount of petrous bone drilling and approach- or resection-related complications. EAPA is a challenging approach that deals with critical neurovascular structures and demands specific skills to be safely performed. Contrary to general belief, its approach-related morbidity seems to be acceptable at dedicated skull base centers. Morbidity can be lowered with careful examination of the preoperative neuroradiological workup, appropriate patient selection, and attention to technical details.

Lateral interbody fusion without intraoperative neuromonitoring in addition to posterior instrumented fusion in geriatric patients: A single center consecutive series of 108 surgeries

IntroductionLateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and lateral thoracic interbody fusion (LTIF), supported by intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), gained popularity as a mini-invasive alternatives for standard interbody fusion. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome in a large elderly patient cohort who underwent LTIF/LLIF without IONM. MethodsThis retrospective, single-center study enrolled elderly patients (≥70 years old) operated during the period from 2010 to 2016. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the L5/S1 segment was excluded from the analysis. ResultsThe study enrolled 108 patients (63 males, 58.3%) with a mean age of 76.5 ​y/o. The mean follow-up was 14.4 ​± ​11.3 months. The mean time of the surgery was 92 ​± ​34.2 ​min. The mean blood loss was 62.2 ​ml. There were no vascular or visceral surgical complications. 39 medical complications were encountered in 24 (22%) patients. Less than 5% of patients presented with a new onset of motor weakness and less than 2% of the patients developed a new sensory deficit at the discharge. 46% of patients were lost in follow-up at 12 months. ConclusionsIONM is not mandatory for LLIF/LTIF surgery in geriatric patients and has a low frequency of approach-related complications as well as neurological deterioration. Our results are comparable to the available literature. Regardless of the utilization of these mini-invasive, anterior approaches, in patients of advanced aged, the risk for major medical complications is high and is responsible for contributing to prolonged hospitalization.

Comparison of mini-open, anteroinferior psoas approach and mini-open, direct lateral transpsoas approach for lumbar burst fractures: A retrospective cohort study.

ObjectiveWe evaluated the effect of a novel modified OLIF technique (anteroinferior psoas approach, AIPA) for anterior decompression reconstruction in lumbar burst fractures, and compared the clinical, radiological outcomes and approach-related complications with the mini-open, lateral transpsoas approach (LTPA).MethodsFrom March 2016 to November 2019, 68 patients with lumbar burst fractures underwent one-stage monosegmental posterior/anterior surgery from L1–L4 segments. 35 patients included in AIPA and 33 patients in LTPA group underwent anterior decompression reconstruction. The clinical, radiological and functional evaluation outcomes were recorded during the 16–60 months follow-up period.ResultsAt the latest follow up, neurological state of one or more ASIA grades were achieved in AIPA (90.9%) and LTPA group (94.9%). No significant differences were noted between the two groups regarding preoperative and postoperative Cobbs angle. The surgery time (192.29 vs. 230.47 min, P = 0.02) in AIPA group was better compared with LTPA. The AIPA showed better improvement on Oswestry Disability Index (43.4% vs. 60.8%, P < 0.05) and Mental Component Score (49.0% vs. 43.7%, P < 0.05) one month after surgery, but no difference at the latest follow-up. 10 patients (9 in LTPA and 1 in AIPA) experienced temporary motor deficits in hip flexor and groin or thigh numbness, which disappeared six months after surgery.ConclusionsCompared with lateral transpsoas approach, anterior decompression reconstruction via mini-open, anteroinferior psoas approach was a safe and less invasive approach, with fewer approach-related complications in the treatment for unstable lumbar burst fractures

Rates of Postoperative Complications and Approach-related Neurological Symptoms After L4-L5 Lateral Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Upper Lumbar Levels.

This was a retrospective comparative study. To compare the likelihood of approach-related complications for patients undergoing single-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) at L4-L5 to those undergoing the procedure at upper lumbar levels. LLIF has been associated with a number of advantages when compared with traditional interbody fusion techniques. However, potential risks with the approach include vascular or visceral injury, thigh dysesthesias, and lumbar plexus injury. There are concerns of a higher risk of these complications at the L4-L5 level compared with upper lumbar levels. A retrospective cohort review was completed for consecutive patients undergoing single-level LLIF between 2004 and 2019 by a single surgeon. Indication for surgery was symptomatic degenerative lumbar stenosis and/or spondylolisthesis. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: LLIF at L4-L5 versus a single level between L1 and L4. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative complications, postoperative approach-related neurological symptoms, and patient-reported outcomes were compared and analyzed between the cohorts. A total of 122 were included in analysis, of which 58 underwent LLIF at L4-L5 and 64 underwent LLIF between L1 and L4. There were no visceral or vascular injuries or lumbar plexus injuries in either cohort. There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative hip pain, anterior thigh dysesthesias, and/or hip flexor weakness between the cohorts (53.5% L4-L5 vs. 37.5% L1-L4; P =0.102). All patients reported complete resolution of these symptoms by 6-month postoperative follow-up. LLIF surgery at the L4-L5 level is associated with a similar infrequent likelihood of approach-related complications and postoperative hip pain, thigh dysesthesias, and hip flexor weakness when compared with upper lumbar level LLIF. Careful patient selection, meticulous use of real-time neuromonitoring, and an understanding of the anatomic location of the lumbar plexus to the working corridor are critical to success.

Intraoperative Complications of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A 5-Year Experience of a Group of Spine Surgeons Performing Their Own Approaches.

Spine surgery has evolved at an accelerated pace, allowing the development of more efficient surgical techniques while providing a decreasing rate of morbimortality. One example of these approaches is the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical complication rate when performing ALIF without the help of a vascular "access" surgeon. A retrospective descriptive study was conducted at the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio between 2014 and 2018 and included all patients who underwent ALIF during this time. A nonsystematic review was performed assessing approach-related complications in ALIF and the impact of "access" surgeons in surgical outcomes. A total of 337 patients were included and 508 levels were fused. ALIF was performed as ALIF-360° (27%), ALIF-lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) (8.9%), and stand-alone ALIF (62%). Most procedures were single-level fusions (51.9%), 45.4% involved 2 levels, and 2.6% were 3-level fusions. The mortality rate was 0%, and only 9 cases of vascular injury were observed and described. Left and common iliac veins were the predominant affected structures. Only a single case required blood transfusion without any other treatment or intensive care unit surveillance. Our study is consistent with literature reports about ALIF complications, finding an incidence of 1.7%. Therefore, ALIF is an excellent alternative for spine procedures, especially for the levels L5-S1 that require sagittal balance restoration. The approaches were performed without a vascular "access" surgeon and presented complication rates similar to those described in the literature.

Application of offset Dingo instruments in Anterior to Psoas (ATP)/Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) procedure: A retrospective study of 80 patients

ObjectiveOblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive lumbar fusion procedure that has flourished in recent years. However, complications related to the anterior-to-psoas (ATP) approach have been reported. The purpose of this study was to assess the OLIF technique using offset design “Dingo” instruments for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disorders. MethodsA retrospective review was performed to identify patients between March 2018 and November 2020 who underwent OLIF with conventional or modified instruments with a minimum follow-up of 12months. Demographic data were recorded. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay were compared between cohorts. Imaging parameters were measured and compared between cohorts before and after surgery. Clinical outcomes were assessed at each follow-up visit. All complications were reviewed. ResultsA total of 80 consecutive patients were included. The mean follow-up times for the conventional group and modified group were 14.5months and 16.3months, respectively. The incidence of hip flexion weakness was 27.5% and 7.5% for the conventional cohort and modified cohort, respectively. The modified group was associated with a shorter operation time, shorter length of hospital stay, higher postoperative disk height and better cage position. The symptoms of all patients improved after surgery. At 1-week follow-up, the modified group showed significantly better clinical scores. ConclusionsOLIF with modified instruments and techniques shows promising outcomes in reducing approach-related complications. Additionally, the modified technique is associated with a better cage position, shorter length of hospital stay and less postoperative pain in the early period.

Pterional Approach: Technical Variations, Functional, and Cosmetic Outcome in a Series of 1000 Patients

INTRODUCTION&#x0D; Most of the versatility of the pterional approach depends on a series of variations progressively reported by several groups, but little emphasized over the years.&#x0D; The present study condenses the technical notes which the authors adopted in their practice to maximize the surgical freedom of the pterional approach, at once lessening the approach-related complication rate.&#x0D; METHODS &#x0D; Data of a series of patients who underwent a pterional approach between January 2011 and May 2021 were retrospectively reviewed focusing on the technical variations compared to the original Yaşargil’s description. The anatomical rationale, technique, and advantages were outlined and validated through the appraisal of functional and cosmetic complications. &#x0D; RESULTS&#x0D; 994 patients were reviewed. Head extension was avoided in the case of anterior clinoidectomy. A single double-layered galea-pericranium flap was used for duraplasty. The submuscular technique, with compulsive preservation of deep temporal fascia and deep temporal arteries, was preferred for temporalis muscle dissection. McCarty keyhole was never used, thus avoiding exposing the orbit if unnecessary. Widening of the superior orbital fissure and thinning of the orbital roof allowed to significantly increase the working area. The average follow-up was 7.2 years. The overall rate of functional and cosmetic complications was 2.1.&#x0D; DISCUSSION&#x0D; In the authors' experience, the gradual adoption of technical variations related to the patient's positioning, soft tissue dissection, bony work, dura opening, and reconstruction allowed to enhance the versatility of the pterional approach concurrently decreasing the risk of functional and cosmetic complications.