e15029 Background: Plasma-based liquid biopsy has rapidly evolved from a novel research tool toward translation into clinical use for many diseases including cancer. While there are still some gaps regarding standardization and clinical utility, as tissue next-gen sequencing had previously faced and overcome, there is a growing body of evidence supporting integration of liquid biopsy into standard of care as a diagnostic tool for precision oncology. Selected from a larger cohort, several cases are presented here illustrating the use of the PGDx elio plasma resolve assay to profile circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients whose tumor and matched normal DNA had also been characterized by a next-generation sequencing panel. Methods: The PGDx elio plasma resolve assay and bioinformatics detects single and multi-nucleotide variants in 33 genes, select amplifications and translocations, as well as microsatellite instability by sequencing on the Illumina NextSeq 500/550 platform. DNA from matched tumor and normal FFPE samples were assessed using the 275 gene Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory’s Comprehensive Cancer Panel (CCP), also on the NextSeq platform. Selected cases represent the range of diagnostic utility that might be expected from ctDNA. Results: Across all cases, there were varying levels of concordance between tissue and plasma as well as novel variants in the plasma that were not present in the tissue DNA demonstrating the benefit of incorporating ctDNA profiling to capture critical genomic information. In one rectal adenocarcinoma case, DNA variants from the primary tumor were detected in ctDNA eight months later during evaluation of a recurrent tumor, suggesting that plasma profiling might have provided early biomarker detection of recurrence. An aggressive and recurrent melanoma, however, showed no concordance between ctDNA and tumor DNA variants, indicating that some tumors may not shed sufficient DNA into the bloodstream to make ctDNA clinically relevant. Another case of melanoma had concordant detection of the driver BRAF V600E mutation in tumor and ctDNA, but ctDNA also contained a pathogenic ATM truncation not observed in the tumor sample. Current clinical trials are investigating the combination of PARP- and ATR-inhibiting drugs, which causes excessive DNA damage and cell death in the context of ATM-deficient cancers. Conclusions: These cases show that combined tissue and ctDNA profiling at the time of initial diagnosis can reveal tumor heterogeneity or distinct metastases not observed in a selected tissue sample, and that profiling during and after therapy may provide early detection of recurrence, appearance of resistance mutations, or monitoring of measurable residual disease.
Read full abstract