Appearance Of Acne Scars Research Articles

The 2910-nm Fiber Laser Is Safe and Effective for Improving Acne Scarring.

Acne scarring results from the inflammation associated with acne papules, which alters dermal collagen, typically producing depressed scars. Lasers have been used to remodel skin improving the texture and appearance of acne scars. Herein, we investigate a new 2910 nm, erbium-doped, fluoride glass, fiber laser for improving acne scars. This novel laser delivers up to 5000 Hz low-energy pulses, providing a unique treatment modality. Fourteen subjects with rolling and/or boxcar acne scars were enrolled in this study. Thirteen subjects completed the final visit and received three treatments with the 2910 nm fiber laser at 6-8-week intervals. Eight subjects were Fitzpatrick type II and five were Fitzpatrick type III. Digital images were taken pre- and 1- and 3-months posttreatment and evaluated by two blinded reviewers in a randomized fashion for improvement. Subjects and the treating physician completed a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) before treatment and at each visit to subjectively evaluate treatment effect. Histological analysis was performed on ex vivo lower eyelid skin samples. Side effects were evaluated by the treating physician and included erythema, edema, and pinpoint bleeding. Evaluation of blinded digital images revealed a mean improvement of 47.3% ± 14.2% (mean ± SEM) 3 months following the final treatment. GAIS scores demonstrated improvement as evaluated by both the subjects and the treating physician. Side effects averaged trace-to-mild erythema, edema, and pinpoint bleeding. This study shows that the 2910 nm, erbium-doped, fluoride glass, fiber laser is safe and effective for improving the appearance of acne scars.

755-nm Picosecond Laser With Diffractive Lens Array for Acne Scars in Fitzpatrick Skin Types V and VI

BACKGROUND Patients commonly complain about the appearance of acne scars. While various lasers and energy-based devices can offer clinical improvement, many of them are limited in treating patients with skin of color. Concerns exist regarding efficacy and safety, including risks of scarring, prolonged dyspigmentation, necrosis, and burns. OBJECTIVE To examine the utility of a 755-nm picosecond laser with fractionated lens array in improving the clinical appearance of acne scars in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types V and VI. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective clinical study investigated this laser using up to 5 monthly treatments. RESULTS Twenty-four subjects were enrolled, while 17 subjects completed a 3-month follow-up. The mean age was 33.9 years, and 95.8% of the subjects were women. Fitzpatrick skin types V and VI were represented. Assessments compared baseline to 3-month follow-up. Two of the 3 blinded reviewers agreed on identifying pretreatment and post-treatment photographs for 82.4% of the cases. For physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, 100% of the subjects had clinical improvement. Overall, 94.1% of subjects were satisfied with their treatment. No serious or unanticipated adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION A 755-nm picosecond laser with fractionated lens array can safely and effectively improve acne scars in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types V and VI.

Treatment of Acne Scars with Microneedling and Chemical Reconstruction of Scarred Skin Therapy (CROSS) Using Penol/Croton Oil Combination.

Microneedling has been shown to release growth factors, which improves the appearance of acne scars by itself and in combination with different therapy modalities. Combining microneedling with Chemical Reconstruction of Scarred Skin (CROSS) therapy using a 60% phenol and 0.2% croton oil combination results in a significant improvement of acne scarring. To assess the safety and efficacy of combination treatments using microneedling in combination with CROSS therapy that contains 60% phenol and 0.2% croton preparation in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types III to V.  Materials and Methods: Patients were treated over a 5-year period for atrophic acne scars using microneedling combined with CROSS. Most of the patients had combination atrophic scarring. High-quality before and after photographs were taken of the patients to assess the improvement in the scars.  Results: Most of the patients (89.5%) had Fitzpatrick skin types IV through V.  Analysis was done on a maximum of 3 microneedling sessions with 1 to 3 CROSS sessions. Photographic evaluation using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale showed an 18% grade-1 improvement and 81% grade-2 improvement. The Goodman and Baron Qualitative scar grading system showed a 62% grade-1 improvement and 38% grade-2 improvement. Combination treatments work best for atrophic scars. This is the first published report of using microneedling with a 60% phenol/0.2% croton oil combination. It proved to be very effective and safe in treating atrophic acne scars in Fitzpatrick skin types III to V, with minimal side effects and a quick recovery. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):418-422.     doi:10.36849/JDD.7657.

Shedding Light on Acne Scars: A Comprehensive Review of CO2 vs. Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser Therapy.

Acne scars pose a significant cosmetic concern and can have a profound impact on individuals' self-esteem and quality of life. Laser therapy has emerged as a promising treatment modality for improving the appearance of acne scars by promoting collagen remodeling and tissue regeneration. This comprehensive review compares two commonly used laser modalities, CO2 and erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG), focusing on their mechanisms of action, efficacy, safety profiles, and patient outcomes. While CO2 lasers offer deeper tissue penetration and the potential for more significant improvement in severe acne scars, Er:YAG lasers provide a gentler approach with a lower risk of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. Recommendations for clinical practice include tailoring treatment approaches to individual patient characteristics, educating patients about treatment expectations and post-treatment care, considering combination therapies for enhanced outcomes, and implementing regular follow-up care. Areas for further research include long-term outcome studies, investigation of laser therapy in ethnically diverse populations, exploration of combination therapies, and evaluation of emerging laser technologies. This review aims to provide clinicians and patients with valuable insights to inform treatment decisions and optimize outcomes in managing acne scars.

Psychosocial impact of acne scarring: correlational study at Euderma Clinic Bali

Purpose: Acne scars are abnormalities in the contour and color of the skin that occur due to acne vulgaris, caused by increased tissue formation or local tissue damage and loss, which often causes disability, especially on the face. Acne scars often cause aesthetic, psychological, social, and emotional problems. This is a challenge for doctors to carry out comprehensive treatment strategies including primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention efforts. This research aims to determine the correlation between psychosocial impact and acne scars at the Euderma Clinic.
 Methods: The research method used was descriptive cross-sectional. The sampling technique used consecutive sampling, namely collecting participants who underwent acne scar management at the Euderma Clinic in the period May-July 2023. In this study, data collection was carried out using a questionnaire that included patient characteristics, acne history, and description of acne scars. The data was analyzed descriptively and correlatively for further data interpretation. 
 Results: Descriptive test results on 121 samples, mostly female (77.7%), mature (72.7%), had a history of untreated acne for > 12 months, (46.3%), and had a habit of squeezing. acne (53.7%), and the severity of acne pustules > 20 (51.9%). The appearance of acne scars is mostly mild (40.5%) and moderate (39.7%). The correlation test results show a close relationship between acne scars and psychosocial impacts. 
 Conclusion: The severity of acne scars in adults is mostly at the mild to moderate stage. Prevention efforts that can be taken are to carry out appropriate acne treatment so that inflammation does not prolong. Management of mild moderate acne scars can be done with laser procedures and subcision to increase patient confidence.

Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Two Microneedling Therapies for Acne Scar Treatment

Microneedling is a minimally invasive procedure based on collagen induction therapy and helps reduce the appearance of acne scars. The aim of the present study is to evaluate and compare skin firmness, elasticity, and improvement of skin texture and reduction of facial erythema after sessions of microneedling procedure performed by using two different devices, i.e., the manual microneedle roller and automated microneedle stamp. A randomized comparative clinical study was conducted. Research subjects in one group were applied with the manual microneedle roller, and those in the other group were applied with the automated microneedle stamp. They were subjected to four months of treatment (4 sessions with a microneedling procedure at 28-day intervals). Skin firmness and elasticity were performed by Cutometry measurement. Subjects were photographed for skin texture and erythema evaluation. It was observed that the microneedling procedure using both devices - microneedle roller and stamp- significantly improved skin firmness and elasticity. The treatment also promoted reductions in the intensity of scar and erythema, respectively. The devices promoted similar beneficial results without significant differences between them. The present study demonstrates that both the manual microneedle roller and automated microneedle stamp comparably resulted in an improvement of skin firmness, elasticity, reduction of facial scar, and erythema.

Laser treatment of acne scarring in skin of colour.

Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder that affects patients of all skin types. Acne scarring affects up to 95% of patients. Laser treatment is the most effective treatment for acne scarring. Adverse effects (AEs) include pain, infection, erythema, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), hypopigmentation and scarring. Patients with darker skin types are more prone to developing PIH, arising as a result of inflammation, which can be intrinsic or extrinsic. There is concern that laser treatment may not be suitable for patients with skin of colour (SOC) due to the risks of AEs. However, the use of appropriate treatment protocols can help to mitigate these risks. Clinicians should consider the type of acne scarring and skin type of the patient when choosing the most appropriate laser. Laser treatments should be offered to patients with SOC, who should be fully informed of the risks before embarking on treatment. It is important to note that no treatment will eliminate scarring completely, but lasers can significantly improve the appearance of acne scars. Laser treatment for acne scarring can be performed safely and effectively when tailored to the patient's needs and skin type. Further studies are needed to evaluate the use of lasers for patients with SOC.

Clear solution for clearer skin

Clear solution for clearer skin

The efficacy and safety of a 70% glycolic acid peel with vitamin C for the treatment of acne scars

<div><p>Acne scarring is a common complication associated with significant psychological distress. Both glycolic acid (GA) and vitamin C are known to improve the appearance of acne scarring.<strong> </strong>We performed a review of 13 patients treated with three 70% GA peels with vitamin C at four weeks apart.<strong> </strong>There was a statistically significant` improvement in acne scarring and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation from the baseline. Maximal effects were noted four weeks after the third chemical peel. It has an excellent safety profile with no permanent adverse effects noted. A combination of 70% glycolic acid with vitamin C chemical peel is an efficacious, well-tolerated treatment of acne scarring in Asian skin. </p></div>

What Role for Carboxytherapy in the Treatment of Acne Scars?

Introduction: Acne is an extremely prevalent condition. The healing of active acne lesions may result in the development of scars. Atrophic scars are the main scars caused by acne and result from the degradation of collagen fibers. Carboxytherapy is a minimally invasive method that involves the application of carbon dioxide subcutaneously through small infiltrations in the skin, which improves scar tissue by increasing collagen's deposition and reorganization. The aim of this study is to review the role of carboxytherapy in the treatment of atrophic facial scars, alone or in combination with other techniques.
 Methods: A literature search was conducted on several databases using MeSH terms “carboxytherapy”, “carbon dioxide/therapy” and “wounds” for guidelines, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies, published over the last 20 years in Portuguese, English or Spanish languages.
 Results: A total of 129 articles were retrieved, of which four experimental studies and one case series were selected. Comparing the techniques of microneedling and carboxytherapy, both were considered non-invasive treatment modalities with equal effectiveness, tolerability and safety, resulting in similar histopathological changes. On the other hand, despite the improvement of acne scars in both treatment modalities, the results were significantly better in favor of carbon dioxide fractional laser, despite having more side effects than carboxytherapy. When these techniques are combined and carboxytherapy is used as a subcision method, there is a more marked and rapid improvement in the appearance of acne scars.
 Discussion: Carboxytherapy is a promising modality in the treatment of atrophic acne scars, alone or in combination with other techniques.

Comparison of Fractional Micro-Plasma Radiofrequency and Fractional Microneedle Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scars: A Pilot Randomized Split-Face Clinical Study in China.

Both fractional micro-plasma radiofrequency (RF) and fractional microneedle RF are novel devices that can be applied for the treatment of atrophic acne scars, and they have both been proved to be effective. To compare the clinical effectiveness and adverse reactions of fractional micro-plasma RF and fractional microneedle RF for the therapy of facial atrophic acne scars in a randomized split-face study. Sixty patients with facial atrophic acne scars received three applications at 2-month intervals in a randomized split-face study using fractional micro-plasma RF and fractional microneedle RF on different sides of the face. Three independent dermatologists evaluated the improvement in acne scars using the ECCA grading scale (Echelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'Acné) by comparing the digital images and graded the improvement in the acne scars. Patients were asked to provide a self-evaluation of satisfaction for efficacy and safety. Adverse effects were also recorded after each treatment. In total sixty patients completed the entire study. A significant improvement was observed in the appearance of acne scars, and the mean ECCA scores improved significantly after both modalities. The mean decrease in ECCA scores from the baseline was significantly more pronounced in fractional micro-plasma RF as compared with fractional microneedle RF (41.33 ± 20.19 vs 32.17 ± 17.35; P < 0.05). The degree of clinical improvement was also significantly better for fractional micro-plasma RF. Pain, erythema, and swelling were observed in all patients after both treatments. The pain was more intense during micro-plasma RF treatment (P = 0.000), and the duration of pain and erythema were longer than with fractional microneedle RF (P = 0.000). Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) was observed in one patient on the fractional micro-plasma RF side while no PIH was observed on the fractional microneedle RF side. No infections or worsening of scarring was observed with either treatment. No subject was dissatisfied with the efficacy of either device. Rolling scars tended to respond better to fractional micro-plasma RF treatment compared with fractional microneedle RF (P = 0.000). Both fractional micro-plasma RF and fractional microneedle RF are effective and safe methods for improving atrophic acne scars. Fractional micro-plasma RF is significantly more effective for atrophic acne scars, especially for rolling scars. However, fractional microneedle RF has fewer side effects plus shorter downtime, and patients are more comfortable after the treatment. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Treatment of atrophic acne scars with combination therapy of chemical reconstruction of skin scars method and fractionated nonablative laser: A retrospective analysis.

Patients with acne scarring often have several types of acne scars, and combination therapies have demonstrated superior success to single treatment modalities. Chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) has gained popularity as the treatment for ice-pick scars and fractionated laser therapy for rolling and boxcar scars. However, no study has looked at combination therapy with CROSS and fractionated nonablative laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scars. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with CROSS and fractionated nonablative laser for atrophic acne scars. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated with CROSS followed by fractionated nonablative laser treatment in the same visit for acne scars from 2016 to 2020. Treatment efficacy, defined as the percentage improvement in the appearance of acne scars, was assessed using a 5-point scale: score 0 (worsening or 0% improvement), 1 (1% - 25%), 2 (26% - 50%), 3 (51%-75%), and 4 (76%-100%). Twenty-five patients (14 females and 11 males, Fitzpatrick Skin Type II -V) were enrolled. The average improvement score was 2.07 after 3 sessions and 2.78 after 5 sessions. All subjects reported satisfaction, while 24% were very satisfied. There were no permanent adverse effects, and only one patient developed a temporary hypertrophic scar. We concluded that combination therapy with CROSS and fractionated nonablative laser in the same visit is an effective and safe treatment option for atrophic acne scars in patients with various skin types, including skin of color.

Using normal and high pulse coverage with picosecond laser treatment of wrinkles and acne scarring: Long term clinical observations.

ObjectiveThe picosecond 755 nm alexandrite laser using a diffractive lens array has demonstrated consistent clinical efficacy for improving the appearance of acne scarring and wrinkles amongst other benefits. This small pilot study is to assess the difference, if any, in clinical benefit if a higher than the standard protocol for number of pulses delivered to a tissue area is used compared to the standard protocol guidelines.MethodSeven subjects received treatment to one side of the face with a standard protocol number of laser pulses with the other side of the face receiving higher than standard number of pulses from the same 755 nm picosecond laser using an additional diffractive lens array. Photographs at final follow up were compared to baseline by two blinded Board Certified Dermatologists and assessed for improvements to acne scarring using a 6‐point grading score, for wrinkles using the Fitzpatrick Wrinkle & Elastosis 3‐point grading scale and a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale assessment. Subjects also completed a satisfaction questionnaire.ResultsFor the acne scarring subjects, the average improvement from baseline to final follow up was 4.0 +/− 1.0 for the standard treated side and 4.5 +/− 0.5 for the high pulse side. There was no statistically significant difference between the two treated sides (P > 0.05, n = 3 paired t‐test). For the wrinkle subjects, the average grading of the standard pulse side improved from 2.0 +/− 0.82 to 1.75 +/− 1.0 from baseline to final follow‐up. The high pulse side improved from 1.5 +/− 1.0 to 1.125 +/− 0.25 from baseline to final follow‐up. There was no statistically significant difference between the improvement of the standard and high pulse treatment sides (P > 0.05, n = 4 paired t‐test). The comparison of baseline to final follow‐up images of each subject found both sides to be Much or Very Much improved with no statistically significant difference between the standard and high pulse sides (P > 0.05, n = 7 paired t‐test). Six of the seven subjects did not note any difference between the effect on different sides of the face and four of the seven rated their overall improvement after treatment as Good, three subjects as Reasonable and one subject with Slight Improvement. All subjects found the treatment comfortable and easy to tolerate and there was no increased incidence of side effects other than the mild occurrences typically observed for this type of treatment.ConclusionThis is a small pilot study with limited subject numbers and further data is needed to be able to make firm conclusions of observed trends, which suggest that the use of higher than standard suggested protocol number of pulses with the diffractive lens array and the 755 nm picosecond laser does not appear to offer any additional benefit over that that can already be achieved with the standard number of pulses, but also does not increase risk of detrimental post treatment effects either. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:51–55, 2018. © 2017 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The efficacy and safety of a 70% glycolic acid peel with vitamin C for the treatment of acne scars

&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Acne scarring is a common complication associated with significant psychological distress. Both glycolic acid (GA) and vitamin C are known to improve the appearance of acne scarring.&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;We performed a review of 13 patients treated with three 70% GA peels with vitamin C at four weeks apart.&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;There was a statistically significant` improvement in acne scarring and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation from the baseline. Maximal effects were noted four weeks after the third chemical peel. It has an excellent safety profile with no permanent adverse effects noted. A combination of 70% glycolic acid with vitamin C chemical peel is an efficacious, well-tolerated treatment of acne scarring in Asian skin. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

Efficacy of Punch Elevation Combined with Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacing in Facial Atrophic Acne Scarring: A Randomized Split-face Clinical Study.

Background:A number of treatments for reducing the appearance of acne scars are available, but general guidelines for optimizing acne scar treatment do not exist. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness and side effects of fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser resurfacing combined with punch elevation with fractional CO2 laser resurfacing alone in the treatment of atrophic acne scars.Materials and Methods:Forty-two Iranian subjects (age range 18–55) with Fitzpatrick skin types III to IV and moderate to severe atrophic acne scars on both cheeks received randomized split-face treatments: One side received fractional CO2 laser treatment and the other received one session of punch elevation combined with two sessions of laser fractional CO2 laser treatment, separated by an interval of 1 month. Two dermatologists independently evaluated improvement in acne scars 4 and 16 weeks after the last treatment. Side effects were also recorded after each treatment.Results:The mean ± SD age of patients was 23.4 ± 2.6 years. Clinical improvement of facial acne scarring was assessed by two dermatologists blinded to treatment conditions. No significant difference in evaluation was observed 1 month after treatment (P = 0.56). Their evaluation found that fractional CO2 laser treatment combined with punch elevation had greater efficacy than that with fractional CO2 laser treatment alone, assessed 4 months after treatment (P = 0.02). Among all side effects, coagulated crust formation and pruritus at day 3 after fractional CO2 laser treatment was significant on both treatment sides (P < 0.05).Conclusion:Concurrent use of fractional laser skin resurfacing with punch elevation offers a safe and effective approach for the treatment of acne scarring.

Picrosirius red staining assessment of collagen after dermal roller application: A minimally invasive percutaneous collagen induction therapy

Background: Percutaneous collagen induction (PCI) through dermal roller breaks old collagen strands, promotes removal of damaged collagen and induces more collagen formation. Collagen fibers can be assessed by traditional stains or by polarized light assessment of Picrosirius red stain. Objective: The purpose of the current study is the clinical and histopathological evaluation of percutaneous collagen formation in atrophic acne scars after dermal roller application. Patients and Methods: Total study duration was 26 weeks in which 12 patients received seven sessions of PCI at 3-weeks interval, 3 mm punch biopsy specimens of scars were obtained before and after treatment (at 18 and 26 weeks). Microscopic examination of pre and post operative biopsies were done, using routine stains and Picrosirius red stain. Results: PCI induced notable improvement in the appearance of acne scars with significant reduction in the score from 123.3 ± 24.5 to 74.16 ± 16.49 (P = 0.00) after 26 weeks. Polarized light assessment of Picrosirius red stain clarified the gradual replacement of old thick orange-red birefringent collagen fibers by newly synthesized thin green-yellow birefringent ones postoperatively. Conclusion: Skin needling is a simple and minimally invasive procedure. The polarized light assessment of Picrosirius red stain clarified the change of the optical properties of collagen fibers according to the maturation process.

Percutaneous collagen induction: an effective and safe treatment for post-acne scarring in different skin phototypes

Background: Atrophic scars can complicate moderate and severe acne. There are, at present, several modalities of treatment with different results. Percutaneous collagen induction (PCI) has recently been proposed as a simple and effective therapeutic option for the management of atrophic scars. Objective:The aim of our study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of percutaneous collagen induction for the treatment of acne scarring in different skin phototypes. Methods & materials: A total of 60 patients of skin types phototype I to VI were included in the study. They were divided into three groups before beginning treatment: Group A (phototypes I to II), Group B (phototypes III to V), and Group C (phototypes VI). Each patient had three treatments at monthly intervals. The aesthetic improvement was evaluated by using a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and analyzed statistically by computerized image analysis of the patients' photographs. The differences in the GAIS scores in the different time-points of each group were found using the Wilcoxon's test for nonparametric-dependent continuous variables. Computerized image analysis of silicone replicas was used to quantify the irregularity of the surface micro-relief with Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT); average values of gray were obtained along the x- and y-axes. The calculated indexes were the integrals of areas arising from the distribution of pixels along the axes. Results:All patients completed the study. The Wilcoxon's test for nonparametric-dependent continuous variables showed a statistically significant (p < 0.05) reduction in severity grade of acne scars at T5 compared to baseline (T1). The analysis of the surface micro-relief performed on skin replicas showed a decrease in the degree of irregularity of skin texture in all three groups of patients, with an average reduction of 31% in both axes after three sessions. No short- or long-term dyschromia was observed. Conclusion: PCI offers a simple and safe modality to improve the appearance of acne scars without risk of dyspigmentation in patient of all skin types.

Management of Acne Scarring, Part I

Acne scarring is the result of a deviation in the orderly pattern of healing and can have profound psychosocial implications for patients. While the most effective means of addressing acne scarring is to prevent its formation through good acne control, there are a number of therapeutic interventions that improve the appearance of acne scars. Many of these procedural modalities have flaws and are limited by operator skill and experience. Laser scar revision, on the other hand, is a precise, well tolerated procedure with clinically demonstrable efficacy and minimal adverse effects that may be used alone or in combination with other scar treatments. The last 20 years has seen a dramatic evolution in laser treatment of acne scars, spanning ablative and nonablative technologies, to the current popularity of fractional laser scar revision. Determining which laser system to use depends upon the type and severity of acne scarring, the amount of recovery a patient can tolerate, and the ultimate goals and expectations of each patient. The importance of proper acne scar classification, laser scar revision techniques, and the evidence that addresses each laser system is reviewed in this article.

The Efficacy of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma Combined with Ablative Carbon Dioxide Fractional Resurfacing for Acne Scars: A Simultaneous Split-Face Trial

Ablative carbon dioxide (CO(2) ) fractional resurfacing is a promising therapeutic intervention for the treatment of acne scars, although this technique is associated with prolonged surgical site erythema and edema, which may affect the daily lives of patients. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is known to enhance wound healing and has applications in many areas of medicine. To evaluate the synergistic effects of autologous PRP with CO(2) fractional resurfacing for acne scars. A split-face trial was conducted in 14 Korean participants with acne scars. All participants received one session of ablative CO(2) fractional resurfacing. Immediately after resurfacing, facial halves were randomly assigned to receive treatment with autologous PRP injections on one side (experimental side) and normal saline injections on the other side (control side). The participants were monitored for degree of recovery and resurfacing-associated adverse events, including prolonged erythema, edema, and other effects on days 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 15, and 30. The intensity of erythema was objectively measured using a chromometer at the same time intervals. After one additional treatment session using the same protocol, two independent dermatologists evaluated clinical improvement using a quartile grading scale. All participants completed the study. Erythema on the experimental side improved faster than on the control side and was significantly less at day 4 (p=.01). This difference was confirmed using a chromometer (p=.049). Total duration of erythema was an average of 10.4±2.7 days on the control side and 8.6±2.0 days on the experimental side (p=.047). Edema also improved faster on the experimental side than on the control side. The total duration of edema was an average of 7.1±1.5 days on the control side and 6.1±1.1 days on the experimental side (p=.04). Participants were also assessed for duration of post-treatment crusting, with a mean of 6.8±1.0 days on the control side and 5.9±1.1 days on the experimental side (p=.04). No other adverse effects were observed in any participant. Four months after the final treatment, overall degree of clinical improvement was significantly better on the experimental side (2.7±0.7) than on the control side (2.3±0.5) (p=.03). Treatment with PRP after ablative CO(2) fractional resurfacing enhances recovery of laser-damaged skin and synergistically improves the clinical appearance of acne scarring.

Repair of Acne Scars With Dermicol-P35

Acne vulgaris is a prevalent skin condition that can cause disfiguring residual scarring. While the complete removal of acne scars is unlikely, several treatments exist that can improve the appearance of acne scars. Dermal fillers offer a simple, nonsurgical corrective procedure that can provide improved skin texture. Dermicol-P35 (Evolence [Ortho Dermatologics, Skillman, NJ]) is a new, highly purified, ribose cross-linked, porcine collagen-based dermal filler that has demonstrated low immunogenicity and results that persist for at least 12 months. This article presents the aesthetic results of a male patient treated with Dermicol-P35 for severe facial acne scars.