Apparent Treatment-resistant Hypertension Research Articles

Social Determinants of Health and Incident Apparent Treatment-Resistant Hypertension Among White and Black US Adults: The REGARDS Study.

We examined the association of multilevel social determinants of health with incident apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH). We analyzed data from 2774 White and 2257 Black US adults from the REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) study taking antihypertensive medication without aTRH at baseline to estimate the association of social determinants of health with incident aTRH. Selection of social determinants of health was guided by the Healthy People 2030 domains of education, economic stability, social context, neighborhood environment, and health care access. Blood pressure (BP) was measured during study visits, and antihypertensive medication classes were identified through a pill bottle review. Incident aTRH was defined as (1) systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg, or systolic BP ≥130 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥80 mm Hg for those with diabetes or chronic kidney disease while taking ≥3 classes of antihypertensive medication or (2) taking ≥4 classes of antihypertensive medication regardless of BP level, at the follow-up visit. Over a median 9.5 years of follow-up, 15.9% of White and 24.0% of Black adults developed aTRH. A percent of the excess aTRH risk among Black versus White adults was mediated by low education (14.2%), low income (16.0%), not seeing a friend or relative in the past month (8.1%), not having someone to care for them if ill or disabled (7.6%), lack of health insurance (10.6%), living in a disadvantaged neighborhood (18.0%), and living in states with poor public health infrastructure (6.0%). Part of the association between race and incident aTRH risk was mediated by social determinants of health.

Revisiting resistant hypertension in kidney disease.

As compared to controlled or uncontrolled hypertension, resistant hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses a significantly increased healthcare burden due to greater target end-organ damage including cardiovascular disease and CKD progression. Patients with CKD have two to three times higher risk of developing resistant hypertension. True resistant hypertension needs to be distinguished from apparent treatment resistant hypertension (aTRH); however, it is usually not possible in epidemiological studies. Moreover, impact of contemporary guidelines changes in the target blood pressure (BP) goal to less than 130/80 mmHg remains to be determined. Up to half of patients with CKD meet aTRH criteria using 2017 ACC/AHA target BP less than 130/80 mmHg. Excess sodium retention in extracellular and tissue compartment remains the cornerstone cause of resistance to the treatment in CKD. Maximizing and optimizing the diuretic regimen in addition to dietary sodium restriction plays a critical role in these patients. Management requires a trustworthy provider-patient relationship facilitating identification and intervention for the barriers restricting the uptake of lifestyle modifications and medications. Recently, renal denervation has been approved and many other novel agents are on the horizon for treatment of true resistant hypertension associated with CKD. This review discusses the latest in the pathophysiology, definition, identification and treatment strategies of resistant hypertension in individuals with CKD. Further investigations are required to identify the prevalence, future implication and treatment outcome data for true resistant hypertension associated with CKD.

Best Practice Alert to Promote Screening for Primary Aldosteronism Among People With Apparent Treatment-Resistant Hypertension

Guidelines recommend that all people with resistant hypertension should be screened for primary aldosteronism (PA). However, less than 2% of people with resistant hypertension are screened for PA. We aimed to develop a noninterruptive Best Practice Alert (BPA) and assess if implementation of the BPA in the electronic health record improved the screening rate for PA among people with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH). We implemented a noninterruptive BPA on 9/17/2022 at our ambulatory primary care, endocrinology, nephrology, and cardiology clinics. We assessed clinical parameters of people with aTRH before (9/17/2021-9/16/2022) and after (9/17/2022-9/16/2023) the BPA was implemented. The noninterruptive BPA embedded with an order set identified people with aTRH and recommended screening for PA if it was not previously performed. There were 10 944 and 11 463 people with aTRH who attended office visits during the 12 mo before and after the BPA implementation, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in median age (P = .096), sex (P = .577), race (P = .753), and ethnicity (P = .472) between the pre- and post- BPA implementation groups. There was a significant increase in PA screening orders placed (227 [2.1%] versus 476 [4.2%], P < .001), and PA screening labs performed (169 [1.5%] versus 382 [3.3, P < .001) after BPA implementation. PA screening tests were positive in 26% (44/169) and 23% (88/382) of people in the pre- and post-BPA groups, respectively (P = .447). In summary, implementation of a real-time electronic health record BPA doubled the screening rate for PA among people with aTRH; however, the overall screening rate was low.

Prediction of cardiovascular and renal risk among patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension in the United States using machine learning methods.

Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH), defined as blood pressure (BP) that remains uncontrolled despite unconfirmed concurrent treatment with threeantihypertensives, is associated with an increased risk of developing cardiovascular and renal complications compared with controlled hypertension. We aimed to identify the characteristics of aTRH patients with an elevated risk of major adverse cardiovascular events plus (MACE+; defined as stroke, myocardial infarction, or heart failure hospitalization) and end stage renal disease (ESRD). This retrospective cohort study included aTRH patients (BP ≥140/90mmHg and taking ≥3antihypertensives) from the United States-based Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record dataset and used machine learning models to identify risk factors of MACE+ or ESRD. Patients had claims for ≥3antihypertensive classes within 30 days between January 1, 2015andJune 30, 2021, and two office BP measures recorded 1-90 days apart within 30 days to 11 months after the index regimen date. Of a total 18797 070 patients identified with any hypertension, 71100 patients had aTRH. During the study period (mean 25.5 months), 4944 (7.0%) patients had a MACE+ and 2403 (3.4%) developed ESRD. In total, 22risk factors were included in the MACE+ model and 16 in the ESRD model, and most were significantly associated with study outcomes. The risk factors with the largest impact on MACE+ risk were congestive heart failure, stages 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD), age ≥80years, and living in the Southern region of the United States. The risk factors with the largest impact on ESRD risk, other than pre-existing CKD, were anemia, congestive heart failure, and type 2 diabetes. The overall study cohort had a 5-year predicted MACE+ risk of 13.4%; this risk was increased in those in the top 50% and 25% high-risk groups (21.2% and 29.5%, respectively). The overall study cohort had a predicted 5-year risk of ESRD of 6.8%, which was increased in the top 50% and 25% high-risk groups (10.9% and 17.1%, respectively). We conclude that risk models developed in our study can reliably identify patients with aTRH at risk of MACE+ and ESRD based on information available in electronic health records; such models may be used to identify aTRH patients at high risk of adverse outcomes who may benefit from novel treatment interventions.

Real-World Impact of Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Apparent Treatment-Resistant or Difficult-to-Control Hypertension and Stages 3 and 4 Chronic Kidney Disease.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common comorbidity in patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH). We assessed clinical outcomes, healthcare resource utilization events, and costs in patients with aTRH or difficult-to-control hypertension and stage 3-4 CKD with uncontrolled vs. controlled BP. This retrospective cohort study used linked IQVIA Ambulatory EMR-US and IQVIA PharMetrics Plus claims databases. Adult patients had claims for ≥3 antihypertensive medication classes within 30 days between 01/01/2015 and 06/30/2021, 2 office BP measures recorded 1-90 days apart, ≥1 claim with ICD-9/10-CM diagnosis codes for CKD 3/4, and ≥1 year of continuous enrollment. Baseline BP was defined as uncontrolled (≥130/80 mm Hg) or controlled (<130/80 mm Hg) BP. Outcomes included risk of major adverse cardiovascular events plus (MACE+; stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), healthcare resource utilization events, and costs during follow-up. Of 3,966 patients with stage 3-4 CKD using ≥3 antihypertensive medications, 2,479 had uncontrolled BP and 1,487 had controlled BP. After adjusting for baseline differences, patients with uncontrolled vs. controlled BP had a higher risk of MACE+ (HR [95% CI]: 1.18 [1.03-1.36]), ESRD (1.85 [1.44-2.39]), inpatient hospitalization (rate ratio [95% CI]: 1.35 [1.28-1.43]), and outpatient visits (1.12 [1.11-1.12]) and incurred higher total medical and pharmacy costs (mean difference [95% CI]: $10,055 [$6,741-$13,646] per patient per year). Patients with aTRH and stage 3-4 CKD and uncontrolled BP despite treatment with ≥3 antihypertensive classes had an increased risk of MACE+ and ESRD and incurred greater healthcare resource utilization and medical expenditures compared with patients taking ≥3 antihypertensive classes with controlled BP.

Apparent Treatment-Resistant Hypertension in the First Year Associated with CV Mortality in PD Patients.

Few reports have focused on the association between apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) and cardiovascular (CV) mortality in peritoneal dialysis (PD) population, thus we conducted this retrospective cohort to explore it.Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted from January 2011 to January 2020 with PD patients in 4 Chinese dialysis centers. ATRH was defined according to the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines. ATRH duration was calculated as the total number of months when patients met the diagnostic criteria in the first PD year. The primary outcome was CV mortality, and the secondary outcomes were CV events, all-cause mortality, combined endpoint (all-cause mortality and transferred to HD), and PD withdrawal (all-cause mortality, transferred to HD and kidney transplantation). Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association. A total of 1,422 patients were finally included in the analysis. During a median follow-up period of 26 months, 83 (5.8%) PD patients incurred CV mortality. The prevalence of aTRH was 24.1%, 19.9%, 24.6% at 0, 3, 12 months after PD initiation respectively. Overall, aTRH duration in the first PD year positively associated with CV mortality (per 3 months increment, adjusted HR, 1.29; 95% CI 1.10, 1.53; P=0.002). After categorized, those with aTRH duration more than 6 months presented the highest adjusted HR of 2.92. Similar results were found for secondary outcomes, except for the CV event. Longer aTRH duration in the first PD year is associated with higher CV mortality and worse long-term clinical outcomes. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Medical Measures in Hypertensives Considered Resistant.

Patients with resistant hypertension are the group of hypertensive patients with the highest cardiovascular risk. All rules and guidelines for treatment of hypertension should be followed strictly to obtain blood pressure (BP) control in resistant hypertension. The mainstay of treatment of hypertension, also for resistant hypertension, is pharmacological treatment, which should be tailored to each patient's specific phenotype. Therefore, it is pivotal to assess nonadherence to pharmacological treatment as this remains the most challenging problem to investigate and manage in the setting of resistant hypertension. Once adherence has been confirmed, patients must be thoroughly worked-up for secondary causes of hypertension. Until such possible specific causes have been clarified, the diagnosis is apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH). Surprisingly few patients remain with true TRH when the various secondary causes and adherence problems have been detected and resolved. Refractory hypertension is a term used to characterize the treatment resistance in hypertensive patients using ≥5 antihypertensive drugs. All pressor mechanisms may then need blockage before their BPs are reasonably controlled. Patients with resistant hypertension need careful and sustained follow-up and review of their medications and dosages at each term since medication adherence is a very dynamic process.

Whole genome sequence analysis of apparent treatment resistant hypertension status in participants from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine program.

Introduction: Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) is characterized by the use of four or more antihypertensive (AHT) classes to achieve blood pressure (BP) control. In the current study, we conducted single-variant and gene-based analyses of aTRH among individuals from 12 Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine cohorts with whole-genome sequencing data. Methods: Cases were defined as individuals treated for hypertension (HTN) taking three different AHT classes, with average systolic BP ≥ 140 or diastolic BP ≥ 90mmHg, or four or more medications regardless of BP (n = 1,705). A normotensive control group was defined as individuals with BP < 140/90mmHg (n = 22,079), not on AHT medication. A second control group comprised individuals who were treatment responsive on one AHT medication with BP < 140/ 90mmHg (n = 5,424). Logistic regression with kinship adjustment using the Scalable and Accurate Implementation of Generalized mixed models (SAIGE) was performed, adjusting for age, sex, and genetic ancestry. We assessed variants using SKAT-O in rare-variant analyses. Single-variant and gene-based tests were conducted in a pooled multi-ethnicity stratum, as well as self-reported ethnic/racial strata (European and African American). Results: One variant in the known HTN locus, KCNK3, was a top finding in the multi-ethnic analysis (p = 8.23E-07) for the normotensive control group [rs12476527, odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 0.80 (0.74-0.88)]. This variant was replicated in the Vanderbilt University Medical Center's DNA repository data. Aggregate gene-based signals included the genes AGTPBP, MYL4, PDCD4, BBS9, ERG, and IER3. Discussion: Additional work validating these loci in larger, more diverse populations, is warranted to determine whether these regions influence the pathobiology of aTRH.

A cost-analysis of managing secondary and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension in a specialist multidisciplinary hypertension clinic.

A knowledge gap exists around the costs and budget impact of specialist hypertension clinics. This study reports on the cost of providing care in a multidisciplinary hypertension clinic staffed by nephrologist, endocrinologist and cardiologist, which manages patients with suspected secondary hypertension and/or apparent treatment-resistant hypertension. The aim of this study is to provide the evidence required to inform policy and planning care pathways for this patient group. A cost analysis from a healthcare provider perspective using micro-costing techniques was conducted to estimate the direct implementation costs of existing standard practice for the care pathway of patients attending the multidisciplinary hypertension clinic. Sixty-five patients originally recruited for a study of medication adherence in hypertension were included in the sample. The total care-pathway cost per patient, taking into account clinic visits, clinical reviews, investigations and MDT discussion, was estimated to be €3277, on average. For the patient subgroups, the average cost was €5644 for patients diagnosed with primary aldosteronism and €1446 for patients diagnosed with essential hypertension. There is significant cost associated with providing specialized hypertension care for patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension. Given the high rates of nonadherence in this population, it is likely that some of this cost could be avoided with better detection and management of medication adherence in this challenging population. Future studies should consider the cost-effectiveness of this or similar models of care by exploring the benefit to patients and the wider healthcare context of providing care of this type.

Comparison of pulse wave velocity and hypertensive response to exercise in predicting incidence of resistant hypertension

Abstract Background Resistant hypertension (RH) is strongly associated with occurrence of major cardiovascular events and death. Hypertensive response to exercise (HRE) and arterial stiffness estimated by peripheral pulse wave velocity (PWV) are surrogate markers of incident hypertension, whereas their role in predicting RH development remains uncertain. Purpose Explore the predictive role of PWV and HRE in incident RH. Methods A Comparison of HRE and PWV in predicting development of RH was performed in retrospective study with a cohort of 198 patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD). The patients performed two Bruce protocol stress tests (STs) between 01/2009 and 12/2022. The first ST was used to assess HRE and estimated PWV (ePWV) in predicting occurrence of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH). ePWV was calculated using age and blood pressure, as previously described (1). HRE response was defined either as systolic BP (SBP) &amp;gt; 210 mmHg or difference between peak and baseline &amp;gt; 60mmHg for men (&amp;gt;190 mmHg or 50 mmHg in women) (2). aTRH was defined as resting SBP above 140mmHg in the last ST despite simultaneous use of ≥3 different antihypertensive agents. The average time between STs was 4±3 years. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke) were analyzed during the follow-up period of 10±3 years. Logistic and Cox regression models were used in time-to-event analysis. Data presented as: mean ± standard deviation; 95% confidence interval (CI) for odds ratios (OR); significance between groups p&amp;lt;0.05. Results The incidence of aTRH between STs was 15% (n=30), with 48% of them (n=14) receiving ≥4 or more antihypertensive drugs. aTRH vs non-aTRH were similar at baseline for sex (89% male, p=0.67), hypertension (HT, 62%,p=0.08), dyslipidemia (79%, p=0.86), smoke (46%, p=0.50), chronic kidney disease (13%, p=0.39), myocardial infarction (75%, p=0.39), heart failure (4.5%, p=0.40), but not for body mass index (30±3 vs 28±3 kg/m2, p=0.012) and diabetes (60.0 vs 28.6%, p=0.003) that were higher in the aTRH group. The average ePWV was 9.3±1.6 m/s (9.14±1.5 vs 10.2±1.7 m/s, non-aTRH vs aTRH p=0.001); 22.6% patients had HRE (20.4% vs 36.0%, non-aTRH vs aTRH, p=0.084). In contrast to HRE (adjusted OR=1.34, CI 0.4-4.3, p=0.62), ePWV was correlated with aTRH (adjusted OR=2.0, CI 1.1-4.1, p=0.024) after adjusting for age, comorbidities and anti-HT drugs, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.7 (CI 0.6-0.8). Both aTHR (OR=2.6, CI 1.2-5.8, p=0.017) and ePWV (adjusted OR=1.3, CI 1.2-5.8, p=0.024) were associated with MACE. Conclusion ePWV is a simple and robust marker that outperforms HRE in predicting aTRH and MACE in CAD patients. Higher ePWV values were independently associated with the incidence of aTRH. This study strengthens the importance of developing new strategies to control arterial stiffness in the treatment of RH and prevention of MACE.

Abstract 12444: Pulse Pressure and Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes by Age in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort

Pulse pressure (PP) is associated with cardiovascular events and the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) to end stage kidney disease (ESKD). While PP is known to widen with age, it is less clear what other clinical factors affect PP and whether the risks associated with wide PP are the same across all ages. We used Cox proportional hazards models to investigate the association of PP with development of 1) atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events (congestive heart failure hospitalization, myocardial infarction, stroke and peripheral artery disease) or death and 2) 50% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or ESKD in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study. In sensitivity analyses, we evaluated the association of time-updated PP with these outcomes, accounting for potential time-updated confounders using inverse probability of treatment weighting. We evaluated for effect modification by age (divided into tertiles), apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (HTN), baseline diabetes mellitus (DM) status, baseline CKD stage and baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD). Among 5,621 participants with CKD followed for ~5.4 years, mean PP was 57±19 mmHg, 1,396 (25%) had an ASCVD event, 1,186 (21%) died and 1,783 (32%) participants experienced the composite renal outcome. Every 10 mm Hg wider PP was associated with 6% higher risk of an ASCVD event or death (time-updated adjusted hazard ratio [HR]=1.06, 95% CI 1.04, 1.08) and 17% higher risk of the composite renal outcome (time-updated adjusted HR=1.17, 95% CI 1.16, 1.18). Wider PP was associated with a higher risk of ASCVD events or death among participants in the lowest age tertile (21-61 years; Figure 1A ), but a higher risk of the composite renal outcome in the oldest age tertile (71-79 years; Figure 1B ), suggesting PP may be associated with different pathophysiology across ages.

Dapagliflozin and Apparent Treatment-Resistant Hypertension in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: The DELIVER Trial.

Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) is prevalent and associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Less is known about the potential role of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibition in this high-risk population. In this post hoc analysis of the DELIVER trial (Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure), we evaluated clinical profiles and treatment effects of dapagliflozin among participants with aTRH. DELIVER participants were categorized on the basis of baseline blood pressure (BP), with aTRH defined as BP ≥140/90 mm Hg (≥130/80 mm Hg if diabetes) despite treatment with 3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic. Nonresistant hypertension was defined as BP above threshold but not meeting aTRH criteria. Controlled BP was defined as BP under threshold. Incidence of the primary outcome (cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure event), key secondary outcomes, and safety events was assessed by baseline BP category. Among 6263 DELIVER participants, 3766 (60.1%) had controlled BP, 1779 (28.4%) had nonresistant hypertension, and 718 (11.5%) had aTRH at baseline. Participants with aTRH had more cardiometabolic comorbidities and tended to have higher left ventricular ejection fraction and worse kidney function. Rates of the primary outcome were 8.7 per 100 patient-years in those with controlled BP, 8.5 per 100 patient-years in the nonresistant hypertension group, and 9.5 per 100 patient-years in the aTRH group. Relative treatment benefits of dapagliflozin versus placebo on the primary outcome were consistent across BP categories (Pinteraction=0.114). Participants with aTRH exhibited the greatest absolute reduction in the rate of primary events with dapagliflozin (4.1 per 100 patient-years) compared with nonresistant hypertension (2.7 per 100 patient-years) and controlled BP (0.8 per 100 patient-years). Irrespective of assigned treatment, participants with aTRH experienced a higher rate of reported vascular events, including myocardial infarction and stroke, over study follow-up. Dapagliflozin modestly reduced systolic BP (by ≈1 to 3 mm Hg) without increasing risk of hypotension, hypovolemia, or other serious adverse events, irrespective of BP category, but did not improve the proportion of participants with aTRH attaining goal BP over time. aTRH was identified in >1 in 10 patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction >40% in DELIVER. Dapagliflozin consistently improved clinical outcomes and was well-tolerated, including among those with aTRH. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03619213.

THU607 Improving Screening For Primary Aldosteronism Among People With Apparent Treatment Resistant Hypertension

Abstract Disclosure: K. Zekarias: None. K. Tessier: None. J. Kohlenberg: None. Introduction: The screening rate for primary aldosteronism (PA) is low among people with resistant hypertension. People with PA experience significantly more cardiovascular complications than those with primary hypertension and an equivalent degree of blood pressure control1. Therefore, identification of people with PA for early-directed therapy is crucial. Objective: We aimed to improve the screening rate for PA among people with apparent treatment resistant hypertension (aTRH), defined as blood pressure &amp;gt;140/90 despite the concurrent use of three antihypertensive drug classes or any person with hypertension on &amp;gt;4 antihypertensive medications. Methods: Using an electronic medical record (EMR) best practice alert (BPA), we implemented a quality improvement (QI) program from 9/17/2022-3/16/2023. We included adults ≥18 years of age with aTRH, who were identified using ICD codes, the last three blood pressure measurements and the antihypertensive medication list. During office visits with nephrologists, cardiologists, endocrinologists, family medicine physicians, and internists, a BPA notified providers if the person with aTRH had not been previously screened for PA with plasma aldosterone and plasma renin activity. The alert defined aTRH, suggested that screening be performed regardless of active medications, and contained an order set for plasma aldosterone, plasma renin activity, and plasma potassium. Furthermore, the BPA suggested referral to an endocrinologist if the patient fulfilled criteria for positive case detection for PA, defined as plasma renin activity &amp;lt; 1 ng/mL/hour and plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) &amp;gt; 10 ng/dL or the plasma aldosterone to renin ratio (ARR) &amp;gt; 30 with PAC &amp;gt; 10. We compared the PA screening rate after the implementation of the BPA to the PA screening rate over the 1 year prior to the BPA implementation (9/16/2021-9/16/2022). Results: Plasma aldosterone lab orders were placed for 3.4% (179/5,261) of people with aTRH post-BPA implementation compared to 1.9% (211/10,944) pre-BPA implementation (p&amp;lt;0.01). Positive case detection for PA occurred in 25% (38/152) of people screened post -BPA implementation compared to 27% (47/173) pre-BPA implementation (p=0.66). People with aTRH who were younger (p&amp;lt;0.01) were more likely to be screened for PA pre-BPA implementation and this did not change post-implementation. Conclusion: Implementation of a QI program employing a BPA with an embedded order set in the EMR improved the screening rate for PA among adults with aTRH. Reference 1. Monticone S, D'Ascenzo F, Moretti C, Williams TA, Veglio F, Gaita F, Mulatero P. Cardiovascular events and target organ damage in primary aldosteronism compared with essential hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Jan; 6 (1):41-50. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023

Characteristics and Predictors of Apparent Treatment Resistant Hypertension in Real-World Populations Using Electronic Health Record-Based Data.

Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) is defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) despite using ≥3 antihypertensive classes or controlled BP while using ≥4 antihypertensive classes. Patients with aTRH have a higher risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared to patients with controlled hypertension (HTN). Although there have been prior reports on the prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of aTRH, these have been broadly derived from smaller datasets, randomized controlled trials, or closed healthcare systems. We extracted patients with HTN defined by ICD 9 and 10 codes during 1/1/2015-12/31/2018, from two large electronic health record databases: the OneFlorida Data Trust (n=223,384) and Research Action for Health Network (REACHnet) (n=175,229). We applied our previously validated aTRH and stable controlled HTN computable phenotype algorithms and performed univariate and multivariate analyses to identify the prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of aTRH in these populations. The prevalence of aTRH among patients with HTN in OneFlorida (16.7%) and REACHnet (11.3%) was similar to prior reports. Both populations had a significantly higher proportion of Black patients with aTRH compared to those with stable controlled HTN. aTRH in both populations shared similar significant predictors, including Black race, diabetes, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, cardiomegaly, and higher body mass index. In both populations, aTRH was significantly associated with similar comorbidities, when compared with stable controlled HTN. In two large, diverse real-world populations, we observed similar comorbidities and predictors of aTRH as prior studies. In the future, these results may be used to improve healthcare professionals' understanding of aTRH predictors and associated comorbidities.

Association of hypertension severity and control with risk of incident atrial fibrillation: The REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study.

The association of hypertension (HTN) severity and control with the risk of incident atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. Increased HTN severity and poorer blood pressure control would be associated with an increased risk of incident AF. This analysis included 9485 participants (mean age 63 ± 8 years; 56% women; 35% Black). Participants were stratified into six mutually exclusive groups at baseline-normotension (n = 1629), prehypertension (n = 704), controlled HTN (n = 2224), uncontrolled HTN (n = 4123), controlled apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) (n = 88), and uncontrolled aTRH (n = 717). Incident AF was ascertained at the follow-up visit, defined by either electrocardiogram or self-reported medical history of a physician diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for demographic and clinical variables. Over an average of 9.3 years later, 868 incident AF cases were detected. Compared to those with normotension, incident AF risk was highest for those with aTRH (controlled aTRH: odds ratio (OR) 2.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60, 5.43, & uncontrolled aTRH: OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.76, 3.48). The increase in AF risk was smaller for those on no more than three antihypertensive agents regardless of their blood pressure control (controlled OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.30, 2.29 and uncontrolled OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.14, 2.13). The risk of developing AF is increased in all individuals with HTN. Risk is highest in those aTRH regardless of blood pressure control. A more aggressive approach that focuses on lifestyle and pharmacologic measures to either prevent HTN or better control HTN during earlier stages may be particularly beneficial in reducing related AF risk.

Apparently Resistant Hypertension in Polish Hemodialyzed Population: Prevalence and Risk Factors.

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, characteristics, and determinants of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) in an unselected large population of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) treated with hemodialysis (HD) throughout the country. A database of 5879 patients (mean age 65.2 ± 14.2 years, 60% of males receiving hemodialysis) was obtained from the biggest provider of hemodialysis in the country. Hypertension and aTRH were defined using pre- or/and post-dialysis BP values. Patients with and without aTRH (non-aTRH) were compared. Using pre- and post-dialysis criteria, hypertension was diagnosed in 90.7% and 89.1% of subjects, respectively. According to pre- and post-dialysis blood pressure criteria, aTRH incidences were 40.9% and 38.4%, respectively. The hypertensive patients with aTRH versus non-aTRH were younger, had a higher rate of cardiovascular disease, lower dialysis vintage, shorter time on dialysis, higher eKt/V, higher ultrafiltration, higher pre- and post-dialysis BP and HR, and higher use of antihypertensive drugs. Factors that increase the risk of aTRH according to both pre- and post-dialysis BP criteria were age-OR 0.99 [0.98-0.99] and 0.99 [0.98-0.99], the history of CVD 1.26 [1.08-1.46] and 1.30 [1.12-1.51], and diabetes 1.26 [1.08-1.47] and 1.28 [1.09-1.49], adjusted OR with 95% CI. In the real-life world, as much as 40% of HD patients may have aTRH. In ESKD HD patients, aTRH seems to be multifactorial, influenced by patient-related rather than dialysis-related factors. Various definitions of aTRH preclude easy comparisons between studies.

Association of uncontrolled blood pressure in apparent treatment-resistant hypertension with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events plus.

Patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) are at increased risk of end-organ damage and cardiovascular events. Little is known about the effects of blood pressure (BP) control in this population. Using a national claims database integrated with electronic medical records, the authors evaluated the relationships between uncontrolled BP (UBP; ≥130/80mmHg) or controlled BP (CBP; <130/80mmHg) and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events plus (MACE+; stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure requiring hospitalization) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in adult patients with aTRH (taking ≥3 antihypertensive medication classes concurrently within 30 days between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2021). MACE+ components were also evaluated separately. Multivariable regression models were used to adjust for baseline differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, and sensitivity analyses using CBP<140/90mmHg were conducted. Patients with UBP (n=22333) were younger and had fewer comorbidities at baseline than those with CBP (n=11427). In the primary analysis, which adjusted for these baseline differences, UBP versus CBP patients were at an 8% increased risk of MACE+ (driven by a 31% increased risk of stroke) and a 53% increased risk of ESRD after 2.7 years of follow-up. Greater MACE+ (22%) and ESRD (98%) risk increases with UBP versus CBP were seen in the sensitivity analysis. These real-world data showed an association between suboptimal BP control in patients with aTRH and higher incidence of MACE+ and ESRD linked with UBP despite the use of multidrug regimens. Thus, there remains a need for improved aTRH management.

Nonadherence Is Common in Patients With Apparent Resistant Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The prevalence of medication nonadherence in the setting of resistant hypertension (RH) varies from 5% to 80% in the published literature. The aim of this systematic review was to establish the overall prevalence of nonadherence and evaluate the effect of the method of assessment on this estimate. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Web of Science (database inception to November 2020) were searched for relevant articles. We included studies including adults with a diagnosis of RH, with some measure of adherence. Details about the method of adherence assessment were independently extracted by 2 reviewers. Pooled analysis was performed using the random effects model and heterogeneity was explored with metaregression and subgroup analyses. The main outcome measured was the pooled prevalence of nonadherence and the prevalence using direct and indirect methods of assessment. Forty-two studies comprising 71,353 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of nonadherence was 37% (95% confidence interval [CI] 27%-47%) and lower for indirect methods (20%, 95% CI 11%-35%), than for direct methods (46%, 95% CI 40%-52%). The study-level metaregression suggested younger age and recent publication year as potential factors contributing to the heterogeneity. Indirect methods (pill counts or questionnaires) are insufficient for diagnosis of nonadherence, and report less than half the rates as direct methods (direct observed therapy or urine assays). The overall prevalence of nonadherence in apparent treatment RH is extremely high and necessitates a thorough evaluation of nonadherence in this setting.

A flexible symbolic regression method for constructing interpretable clinical prediction models

Machine learning (ML) models trained for triggering clinical decision support (CDS) are typically either accurate or interpretable but not both. Scaling CDS to the panoply of clinical use cases while mitigating risks to patients will require many ML models be intuitively interpretable for clinicians. To this end, we adapted a symbolic regression method, coined the feature engineering automation tool (FEAT), to train concise and accurate models from high-dimensional electronic health record (EHR) data. We first present an in-depth application of FEAT to classify hypertension, hypertension with unexplained hypokalemia, and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) using EHR data for 1200 subjects receiving longitudinal care in a large healthcare system. FEAT models trained to predict phenotypes adjudicated by chart review had equivalent or higher discriminative performance (p < 0.001) and were at least three times smaller (p < 1 × 10−6) than other potentially interpretable models. For aTRH, FEAT generated a six-feature, highly discriminative (positive predictive value = 0.70, sensitivity = 0.62), and clinically intuitive model. To assess the generalizability of the approach, we tested FEAT on 25 benchmark clinical phenotyping tasks using the MIMIC-III critical care database. Under comparable dimensionality constraints, FEAT’s models exhibited higher area under the receiver-operating curve scores than penalized linear models across tasks (p < 6 × 10−6). In summary, FEAT can train EHR prediction models that are both intuitively interpretable and accurate, which should facilitate safe and effective scaling of ML-triggered CDS to the panoply of potential clinical use cases and healthcare practices.

Pharmacoepidemiologic study of association between apparent treatment resistant hypertension, cardiovascular disease and interaction effect by sex and age

A limited number of studies have been conducted to test the magnitudes of the association between apparent treatment resistant hypertension (aTRH) and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). To investigate the association between aTRH and risk of CVD and examine whether sex and age modify this association. We applied an observational analysis study design using data from the United States Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). ALLHAT recruited participants (n = 25516) from 625 primary care settings throughout the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico, and United States Virgin Islands, aged 55 and older with hypertension and at least one additional risk factor for heart disease. aTRH was assessed from the year 2 visit. CVD event was defined as one of the following from the year 2 follow-up visit: Fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, angina, stroke, heart failure, or peripheral artery disease. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the effect of aTRH on CVD risk. Potential modifications of sex and age on this association were examined on the multiplicative scale by interaction term and additive scale by joint effects and relative excess risk for interaction. Of the total study participants (n = 25516), 5030 experienced a CVD event during a mean of 4.7 years follow-up. aTRH was associated with a 30% increase in risk of CVD compared to non-aTRH [hazards ratio (HR) = 1.3, 95%CI: 1.19-1.42]. Sex and age modified this relationship on both multiplicative and additive scales independently. Stratified by sex, aTRH was associated with a 64% increase in risk of CVD (HR = 1.64, 95%CI: 1.43-1.88) in women, and a 13% increase in risk of CVD (HR = 1.13, 95%CI: 1.01-1.27) in men. Stratified by age, aTRH had a stronger impact on the risk of CVD in participants aged < 65 (HR = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.32-1.77) than it did in those aged ≥ 65 (HR = 1.18, 95%CI: 1.05-1.32). Significant two-way interactions of sex and aTRH, and age and aTRH on risk of CVD were observed (P < 0.05). The observed joint effect of aTRH and ages ≥ 65 years (HR = 1.85, 95%CI: 1.22-2.48) in males was less than what was expected for both additive and multiplicative models (HR = 4.10, 95%CI: 3.63-4.57 and 4.88, 95%CI: 3.66-6.31), although three-way interaction of sex, age, and aTRH on the risk of CVD and coronary heart disease did not reach a statistical significance (P > 0.05). aTRH was significantly associated with an increased risk of CVD and this association was modified by both sex and age. Further studies are warranted to test these mechanisms.