Apparent Treatment-resistant Hypertension Research Articles

Prognosis of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension and poor adherence: a nationwide cohort study.

Large-scale studies of the prognosis of resistant hypertension in Asian populations are limited, and the impact of poor adherence on clinical prognosis in patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension has not been studied. A nationwide cohort analysis was done utilizing the National Health Insurance Service database in Korea, covering patients who participated in health examinations from 2013 to 2018. A total of 935,002 patients were classified into apparent treatment-resistant (N = 69,372) or nonresistant (N = 865,630) hypertension based on blood pressure control and antihypertensive medication use. Medication adherence was assessed using the proportion of days covered. The primary composite outcome included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure. Other outcomes were the development of atrial fibrillation and progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The median follow-up duration was 6.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 4.1-7.0) years. Patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension were at a higher risk for the primary composite outcome than those with nonresistant hypertension (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-1.35). The incidence rates of ESRD were notably higher in the resistant hypertension group (HR, 3.02; 95% CI, 2.85-3.20). Among participants with resistant hypertension, 3852 (5.7%), 11,667 (17.3%), and 51,879 (77%) had poor, suboptimal, and optimal adherence, respectively. Poor medication adherence in apparent treatment-resistant hypertension was associated with a higher risk of the primary composite outcome compared to optimal adherence (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.36-1.63). Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension is associated with significant cardiovascular risks in the Korean population. Poor adherence to antihypertensive medication significantly elevates the risk of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension, underscoring the need for stringent management of these patients.

Discrepancies between home blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in apparent treatment-resistant hypertension: analysis from the Korean resistant hypertension cohort.

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurements in patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aRH) enrolled from 15 tertiary care centers in South Korea. aRH was defined as having uncontrolled office BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg despite receiving three classes of antihypertensive medication or any level of BP despite receiving ≥4 classes of antihypertensive medication. Patients with complete data for office BP, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), and home BP measurements at baseline were included. BP control status between ABPM and home BP measurements was compared. Out of 1457 patients, 823 meeting the enrollment criteria were included (mean age: 59.9 ± 13.6 years; 57.5% male patients). Among them, 7.2% had controlled BP, 8.7% had whitecoat uncontrolled hypertension, 15.1% had masked uncontrolled hypertension, and 69% had sustained hypertension, as measured through baseline ABPM. Additionally, 43% of patients with controlled BP based on home BP measurement had nocturnal hypertension. Relying solely on home BP measurement may result in misclassifying 70% of patients as having either controlled BP or whitecoat uncontrolled BP. This study reaffirms the circadian pattern of resistant hypertension, characterized by a higher prevalence of non-dipping and rising patterns, even in patients with BP controlled based on ABPM. Considering the persistent difference between home BP measurement and ABPM, even at a lower home BP threshold, integrating both measurements into the management of aRH is advisable.

Utility of a Systolic Blood Pressure Polygenic Risk Score With Chlorthalidone Response

The clinical utility of polygenic risk scores (PRS) for blood pressure (BP) response to antihypertensive treatment (AHT) has not been elucidated. To investigate the ability of a systolic BP (SBP) PRS to predict AHT response and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH). The Genetics of Hypertension Associated Treatments (GenHAT) study was an ancillary pharmacogenomic study to the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). ALLHAT, which enrolled participants aged 55 years or older with hypertension (HTN) starting in February 1994, completed follow-up in March 2002. The current study was conducted from a subset of Black GenHAT participants randomized to the treatment groups of either chlorthalidone (n = 3745) or lisinopril (n = 2294), with genetic data available from a prior genetic association study. The current study's objective was to examine the association of the SBP PRS to AHT response over 6 months, as well as to examine the predictive accuracy of the SBP PRS with aTRH. The current analysis took place in February 2023, with additional analyses conducted in July 2024. An SBP PRS (comprising 1 084 157 genetic variants) stratified as quintiles and per SD. The primary outcome was change in SBP (ΔSBP) and diastolic BP (ΔDBP) over 6 months. aTRH was defined as the use of 3 AHTs with uncontrolled HTN at year 3 of follow-up or taking 4 or more AHTs at year 3 of follow-up, regardless of BP. Baseline demographics were compared across PRS quintiles using Kruskal-Wallis or χ2 tests as appropriate. The least-square means of BP response were calculated through multivariable adjusted linear regression, and multivariable adjusted logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for aTRH. Among 3745 Black GenHAT participants randomized to chlorthalidone treatment, median (IQR) participant age was 65 (60-71) years, and 2064 participants (55.1%) were female. Each increasing quintile of the SBP PRS from 1 to 5 was associated with a reduced BP response to treatment over 6 months. Participants in the lowest quintile experienced a mean ΔSBP of -10.01 mm Hg (95% CI, -11.11 to -8.90) compared to -6.57 mm Hg (95% CI, -7.67 to -5.48) for participants in the median quintile. No associations were observed between the SBP PRS and BP response to lisinopril. Participants in the highest PRS quintile had 67% higher odds of aTRH compared to those in the median quintile (odds ratio, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.19-2.36). These associations were independently validated. In this genetic association study, Black individuals with HTN at a lower genetic risk of elevated BP experienced an approximately 3.5 mm Hg-greater response to chlorthalidone compared with those at an intermediate genetic risk of elevated BP. SBP PRS may also identify individuals with HTN harboring a higher risk of treatment-resistant HTN. Overall, SBP PRS demonstrates potential to identify those who may have greater benefit from chlorthalidone, but future research is needed to determine if PRS can inform initiation and choice of treatment among individuals with HTN.

Blood Pressure Reduction and Changes in Antihypertensive Medication Use Among Patients With Hypertension Who Initiated Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have demonstrated a blood pressure (BP) reduction benefit despite other indications for use. We evaluated BP changes and antihypertensive medication use pre- and post-SGLT2i initiation among 12 960 patients with treated hypertension and among subgroups with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) and/or proteinuria. Post-SGLT2i initiation, the mean (SD) systolic blood pressure (SBP) was reduced from 133.9 (16.4) to 128.6 (15.5) mmHg and the mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was reduced from 70.8 (11.8) to 68.3 (11.3) mmHg among all patients. The mean SBP/DBP reduction was 5.3/2.5, 6.2/2.8, and 6.1/2.9mmHg among all patients, patients with aTRH, and patients with proteinuria, respectively. Achieved BP < 130/80mmHg increased by 12.5%, 16.9%, and 11.1% for all patients, patients with aTRH, and patients with proteinuria, respectively. Discontinuation of ≥ 1 antihypertensive medication within 12 months of SGLT2i initiation occurred in 33.4% overall, 47.6% of patients with aTRH, and 38.7% of patients with proteinuria.

Predictive Factors of Apparent Treatment Resistant Hypertension Among Patients With Hypertension Identified Using Electronic Health Records.

Early identification of a patient with resistant hypertension (RH) enables quickly intensified treatment, short-interval follow-up, or perhaps case management to bring his or her blood pressure under control and reduce the risk of complications. To identify predictors of RH among individuals with newly diagnosed hypertension (HTN), while comparing different prediction models and techniques for managing missing covariates using electronic health records data. Risk prediction study in a retrospective cohort. Adult patients with incident HTN treated in any of the primary care clinics of one health system between April 2013 and December 2016. Predicted risk of RH at the time of HTN identification and candidate predictors for variable selection in future model development. Among 26,953 individuals with incident HTN, 613 (2.3%) met criteria for RH after 4.7 months (interquartile range, 1.2-11.3). Variables selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), included baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) and its missing indicator (a dummy variable created if baseline SBP is absent), use of antihypertensive medication at the time of cohort entry, body mass index, and atherosclerosis risk. The random forest technique achieved the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.893 (95% CI, 0.881-0.904) and the best calibration with a calibration slope of 1.01. Complete case analysis is not a valuable option (AUC = 0.625). Machine learning techniques and traditional logistic regression exhibited comparable levels of predictive performance after handling the missingness. We suggest that the variables identified by this study may be good candidates for clinical prediction models to alert clinicians to the need for short-interval follow up and more intensive early therapy for HTN.

Abstract P306: Aldosterone levels are associated with hypertension in post-menopausal women: the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation

Introduction: Hypertension (HTN) is the leading cause of premature death in women. Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) is systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥90 mmHg despite treatment with ≥3 antihypertensive medications, or the use of ≥4 antihypertensive medications (irrespective of the BP level). aTRH occurs in approximately 17% of people with treated HTN. High aldosterone may elevate cardiovascular risk; despite causing sodium retention, aldosterone may paradoxically continue to be secreted even when dietary sodium intake is high. Little is known, however, about how aldosterone relates to BP and HTN in women, in whom significant increases in BP, carotid atherosclerosis, and arterial stiffness occur near the time of menopause. We examined the relationships of aldosterone with HTN and aTRH in a cohort of post-menopausal women. Methods: The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) is a longitudinal cohort of women followed from midlife into late adulthood. This cross-sectional analysis included 999 women (30.3% of the cohort) free of congestive heart failure and with serum aldosterone measured during the 2015-2016 (15th follow-up) study visit. HTN was defined as SBP or DBP ≥140 or ≥90 mmHg, respectively, or use of antihypertensive medications. aTRH was defined as reported use of 4 or more concurrent antihypertensive medications at any visit, or 3 or more concurrent medications and SBP≥140 or DBP≥90 at two consecutive visits. Multivariable logistic regression related HTN or aTRH and aldosterone, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and body mass index. Results: In this cohort of women [mean age 66 years (standard deviation:2.7)], the prevalence of HTN and aTRH was 52% and 4.1%, respectively. Women with aTRH had higher median serum aldosterone [8.7 ng/dL, interquartile range (IQR) 5.0-11.7] versus those without (6.7 ng/dL, IQR 2.7-10.5). Each unit increase in aldosterone was associated with a 4% increased odds of HTN (95%CI 1.02,1.06; p&lt;0.001). Similarly, the odds ratio for aTRH in the adjusted model was 1.04 (95%CI 0.99,1.08), although the association was not statistically significant (p=0.09). Conclusion: Aldosterone was positively associated with HTN and there was a non-statistically significant trend toward an association with aTRH in this cohort of post-menopausal women. Our findings suggest that aldosterone within an ostensibly “normal” range is associated with HTN in postmenopausal women.

Characterizing apparent treatment resistant hypertension in the United States: insights from the All of Us Research Program.

Hypertension (HTN) remains a significant public health concern and the primary modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, which is the leading cause of death in the United States. We applied our validated HTN computable phenotypes within the All of Us Research Program to uncover prevalence and characteristics of HTN and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) in United States. Within the All of Us Researcher Workbench, we built a retrospective cohort (January 1, 2008-July 1, 2023), identifying all adults with available age data, at least one blood pressure (BP) measurement, prescribed at least one antihypertensive medication, and with at least one SNOMED "Essential hypertension" diagnosis code. We identified 99 461 participants with HTN who met the eligibility criteria. Following the application of our computable phenotypes, an overall population of 81 462 were further categorized to aTRH (14.4%), stable-controlled HTN (SCH) (39.5%), and Other HTN (46.1%). Compared to participants with SCH, participants with aTRH were older, more likely to be of Black or African American race, had higher levels of social deprivation, and a heightened prevalence of comorbidities such as hyperlipidemia and diabetes. Heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes were the comorbidities most strongly associated with aTRH. β-blockers were the most prescribed antihypertensive medication. At index date, the overall BP control rate was 62%. All of Us provides a unique opportunity to characterize HTN in the United States. Consistent findings from this study with our prior research highlight the interoperability of our computable phenotypes.

Evaluation of aldosterone to direct renin ratio, low renin and related Phenotypes in Afro-Colombian patients with apparent treatment resistant hypertension

Apparent resistant hypertension (aTRH) is a significant public health issue. Once low adherence to antihypertensive treatment has been ruled out and true resistant hypertension is diagnosed, aldosterone-direct-renin-ratio (ADRR) aids in the screening of an aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) and primary aldosteronism (PA). Once PA and other secondary causes have been ruled out, the values of aldosterone and renin allow patients to be classified into phenotypes such as low renin hypertension (LRH), Liddle’s-like (LLph), and primary hyperaldosteronism (PAph). These classifications could aid in the treatment decision-making process. However, optimal cut-off points for these classifications remain uncertain. This study aims to assess the prevalence of these phenotypes and the behavior of different cut-offs of the ADRR in an Afro-Colombian population with apparent resistant hypertension, as well to describe their sodium consumption. Afro-descendant individuals 18 years of age or older, diagnosed with resistant hypertension and attending to a primary care center in Colombia were recruited as volunteers. As part of the study, their plasma renin concentration (PRC) and plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) were measured. The phenotypes were categorized into three groups based on multiple cut-off points from different authors: low renin and low aldosterone phenotype (LLph), low renin and high aldosterone phenotype (PAph), and high renin and high aldosterone phenotype, referred to as the renal phenotype (Rph). The prevalence of ADRR values exceeding the cut-off and phenotypes were calculated. A linear regression model was derived to assess the effect of sodium consumption with PAC, PRC and ADRR. A total of 88 patients with aTRH were included. Adherence to at least 3 antihypertensive medications was 62.5%. The median age was 56 years (IQR 48–60), 44% were female, and 20% had diabetes. The study found that the prevalence of ADRR values exceeding the cut-off ranged from 4.5 to 23%, while low-renin hypertension (LRH) varied from 15 to 74%, Rph was found in approximately 30 to 34% of patients, PAph in 30 to 51%, and the LLph in 15 to 41%, respectively, depending on the specific cut-off value by different authors. Notably, sodium consumption was associated with lower aldosterone (β − 0.15, 95% CI [− 0.27, − 0.03]) and renin concentrations (β − 0.75, 95% CI [− 1.5, − 0.02]), but ADRR showed no significant association with sodium consumption. There were no significant differences in prevalences between the groups taking < 3 vs ≥ 3 antihypertensive medications. Altered aldosterone-direct-renin-ratio, low renin hypertension, Liddle’s-like, and primary hyperaldosteronism are prevalent phenotypes in patients within Afro-Colombian patients with apparent treatment-Resistant hypertension.

Antihypertensive Medication Use Trajectories After Bariatric Surgery: A Matched Cohort Study.

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective and durable treatment for obesity. We aimed to compare the trajectories of antihypertensive medication (AHM) use among obese individuals treated and not treated with MBS. Adults with a body mass index of ≥35 kg/m2 were identified in the Merative Database (US employer-based claims database). Individuals treated with versus without MBS were matched 1:1 using baseline demographic and clinical characteristics as well as AHM utilization. Monthly AHM use was examined in the 3 years after the index date using generalized estimating equations. Subanalyses investigated rates of AHM discontinuation, AHM initiation, and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension. The primary cohort included 43 206 adults who underwent MBS matched with 43 206 who did not. Compared with no MBS, those treated with MBS had sustained, markedly lower rates of AHM use (31% versus 15% at 12 months; 32% versus 17% at 36 months). Among patients on AHM at baseline, 42% of patients treated with MBS versus 7% treated medically discontinued AHM use (P<0.01). The risk of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension was 3.41× higher (95% CI, 2.91-4.01; P<0.01) 2 years after the index date in patients who did not undergo MBS. Among those without hypertension treated with MBS versus no MBS, 7% versus 21% required AHM at 2 years. MBS is associated with lower rates of AHM use, higher rates of AHM discontinuation, and lower rates of AHM initiation among patients not taking AHM. These findings suggest that MBS is both an effective treatment and a preventative measure for hypertension.

Social Determinants of Health and Incident Apparent Treatment-Resistant Hypertension Among White and Black US Adults: The REGARDS Study.

We examined the association of multilevel social determinants of health with incident apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH). We analyzed data from 2774 White and 2257 Black US adults from the REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) study taking antihypertensive medication without aTRH at baseline to estimate the association of social determinants of health with incident aTRH. Selection of social determinants of health was guided by the Healthy People 2030 domains of education, economic stability, social context, neighborhood environment, and health care access. Blood pressure (BP) was measured during study visits, and antihypertensive medication classes were identified through a pill bottle review. Incident aTRH was defined as (1) systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg, or systolic BP ≥130 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥80 mm Hg for those with diabetes or chronic kidney disease while taking ≥3 classes of antihypertensive medication or (2) taking ≥4 classes of antihypertensive medication regardless of BP level, at the follow-up visit. Over a median 9.5 years of follow-up, 15.9% of White and 24.0% of Black adults developed aTRH. A percent of the excess aTRH risk among Black versus White adults was mediated by low education (14.2%), low income (16.0%), not seeing a friend or relative in the past month (8.1%), not having someone to care for them if ill or disabled (7.6%), lack of health insurance (10.6%), living in a disadvantaged neighborhood (18.0%), and living in states with poor public health infrastructure (6.0%). Part of the association between race and incident aTRH risk was mediated by social determinants of health.

Revisiting resistant hypertension in kidney disease.

As compared to controlled or uncontrolled hypertension, resistant hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses a significantly increased healthcare burden due to greater target end-organ damage including cardiovascular disease and CKD progression. Patients with CKD have two to three times higher risk of developing resistant hypertension. True resistant hypertension needs to be distinguished from apparent treatment resistant hypertension (aTRH); however, it is usually not possible in epidemiological studies. Moreover, impact of contemporary guidelines changes in the target blood pressure (BP) goal to less than 130/80 mmHg remains to be determined. Up to half of patients with CKD meet aTRH criteria using 2017 ACC/AHA target BP less than 130/80 mmHg. Excess sodium retention in extracellular and tissue compartment remains the cornerstone cause of resistance to the treatment in CKD. Maximizing and optimizing the diuretic regimen in addition to dietary sodium restriction plays a critical role in these patients. Management requires a trustworthy provider-patient relationship facilitating identification and intervention for the barriers restricting the uptake of lifestyle modifications and medications. Recently, renal denervation has been approved and many other novel agents are on the horizon for treatment of true resistant hypertension associated with CKD. This review discusses the latest in the pathophysiology, definition, identification and treatment strategies of resistant hypertension in individuals with CKD. Further investigations are required to identify the prevalence, future implication and treatment outcome data for true resistant hypertension associated with CKD.

TREAT TRIAL: MULTI-CENTER CROSS-SECTIONAL TREATMENT EVALUATION OF APPARENT RESISTANT HYPERTENSION IN BELGIUM

Objective: The goal of the TREAT study is to evaluate the prevalence of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aRHT) in a Belgian setting and to evaluate which determining factor of pseudo-resistant hypertension contributes the most to this prevalence: white coat hypertension (WCH), underdosing of adequate drugs or poor adherence to prescribed medicines. Design and method: TREAT is a single-visit, multicentric, non-interventional, cross-sectional survey. Inclusion criteria were the following: patients over 18 years old receiving 3 or more antihypertensive molecules and referred to specialized hospital centres for aRHT. The data were collected according to the patient’s medical records. Self-reported adherence to antihypertensive treatment was collected and a Hill-bone medication adherence scale was also proposed. Results: A total of 232 patients were included. Mean anti-hypertensive treatment duration was 10.6(±9.1) years. Patients were treated with a mean of 3.8(±1.1) antihypertensive molecules and 2.8(±1.1) antihypertensive pills. Only 48.5% of the aRHT patients were treated with the triple therapy recommended by the 2023 ESH hypertension guidelines (i.e. renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi), calcium channel blocker (CCB) and diuretic), and only 29.1% of patients were treated with the maximal recommended dose. Inadequate dosing was mostly present with diuretics, only 60% of patients was treated with at least half the maximum dose of a diuretic. WCH was present in 11% of patients in whose ambulatory BP measurements were available in records (n=136). Therapeutic adherence was self-reported as poor or moderate in 17.6% of patients (n=41). The Hill-bone medication adherence scale (n=140, 60.4%) showed a mean score of 12(±4.2) (good adherence). In this cohort, 31.8% of patients seemed to have true resistant hypertension. Conclusions: Among patients referred to specialized centres for aRHT, about 2/3 of patients have in reality pseudo-resistant hypertension. Whereas WCH and poor adherence seems to be limited in our dataset, many patients were polymedicated with non-recommended combinations of antihypertensive molecules in 1 out of 2 patients, with inadequate dosing in 2 out of 3 patients. Pseudo-resistant hypertension seems in our cohort to be mainly related to under-use of triple combination therapy and most likely also due to underdosing.

Best Practice Alert to Promote Screening for Primary Aldosteronism Among People With Apparent Treatment-Resistant Hypertension

ObjectiveGuidelines recommend screening all individuals with resistant hypertension for primary aldosteronism (PA) but less than 2% are screened. We aimed to develop a noninterruptive Best Practice Alert (BPA) to assess if its implementation in the electronic health record improved PA screening rates among individuals with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH). MethodsWe implemented a noninterruptive BPA on 9/17/2022 at our ambulatory primary care, endocrinology, nephrology, and cardiology clinics. We assessed clinical parameters of people with aTRH before (9/17/2021-9/16/2022) and after (9/17/2022-9/16/2023) the BPA was implemented. The noninterruptive BPA embedded with an order set identified people with aTRH and recommended screening for PA if it was not previously performed. ResultsThere were 10 944 and 11 463 people with aTRH who attended office visits during the 12 months before and after the BPA implementation, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in median age (P = .096), sex (P = .577), race (P = .753), and ethnicity (P = .472) between the pre- and post-BPA implementation groups. There was a significant increase in PA screening orders placed (227 [2.1%] vs 476 [4.2%], P < .001) and PA screening labs performed (169 [1.5%] vs 382 [3.3, P < .001) after BPA implementation. PA screening tests were positive in 26% (44/169) and 23% (88/382) of people in the pre- and post-BPA groups, respectively (P = .447). ConclusionImplementation of a real-time electronic health record BPA doubled the screening rate for PA among people with aTRH; however, the overall screening rate was low.

Prediction of cardiovascular and renal risk among patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension in the United States using machine learning methods.

Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH), defined as blood pressure (BP) that remains uncontrolled despite unconfirmed concurrent treatment with threeantihypertensives, is associated with an increased risk of developing cardiovascular and renal complications compared with controlled hypertension. We aimed to identify the characteristics of aTRH patients with an elevated risk of major adverse cardiovascular events plus (MACE+; defined as stroke, myocardial infarction, or heart failure hospitalization) and end stage renal disease (ESRD). This retrospective cohort study included aTRH patients (BP ≥140/90mmHg and taking ≥3antihypertensives) from the United States-based Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record dataset and used machine learning models to identify risk factors of MACE+ or ESRD. Patients had claims for ≥3antihypertensive classes within 30 days between January 1, 2015andJune 30, 2021, and two office BP measures recorded 1-90 days apart within 30 days to 11 months after the index regimen date. Of a total 18797 070 patients identified with any hypertension, 71100 patients had aTRH. During the study period (mean 25.5 months), 4944 (7.0%) patients had a MACE+ and 2403 (3.4%) developed ESRD. In total, 22risk factors were included in the MACE+ model and 16 in the ESRD model, and most were significantly associated with study outcomes. The risk factors with the largest impact on MACE+ risk were congestive heart failure, stages 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD), age ≥80years, and living in the Southern region of the United States. The risk factors with the largest impact on ESRD risk, other than pre-existing CKD, were anemia, congestive heart failure, and type 2 diabetes. The overall study cohort had a 5-year predicted MACE+ risk of 13.4%; this risk was increased in those in the top 50% and 25% high-risk groups (21.2% and 29.5%, respectively). The overall study cohort had a predicted 5-year risk of ESRD of 6.8%, which was increased in the top 50% and 25% high-risk groups (10.9% and 17.1%, respectively). We conclude that risk models developed in our study can reliably identify patients with aTRH at risk of MACE+ and ESRD based on information available in electronic health records; such models may be used to identify aTRH patients at high risk of adverse outcomes who may benefit from novel treatment interventions.

Real-World Impact of Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Apparent Treatment-Resistant or Difficult-to-Control Hypertension and Stages 3 and 4 Chronic Kidney Disease.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common comorbidity in patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH). We assessed clinical outcomes, healthcare resource utilization events, and costs in patients with aTRH or difficult-to-control hypertension and stage 3-4 CKD with uncontrolled vs. controlled BP. This retrospective cohort study used linked IQVIA Ambulatory EMR-US and IQVIA PharMetrics Plus claims databases. Adult patients had claims for ≥3 antihypertensive medication classes within 30 days between 01/01/2015 and 06/30/2021, 2 office BP measures recorded 1-90 days apart, ≥1 claim with ICD-9/10-CM diagnosis codes for CKD 3/4, and ≥1 year of continuous enrollment. Baseline BP was defined as uncontrolled (≥130/80 mm Hg) or controlled (<130/80 mm Hg) BP. Outcomes included risk of major adverse cardiovascular events plus (MACE+; stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), healthcare resource utilization events, and costs during follow-up. Of 3,966 patients with stage 3-4 CKD using ≥3 antihypertensive medications, 2,479 had uncontrolled BP and 1,487 had controlled BP. After adjusting for baseline differences, patients with uncontrolled vs. controlled BP had a higher risk of MACE+ (HR [95% CI]: 1.18 [1.03-1.36]), ESRD (1.85 [1.44-2.39]), inpatient hospitalization (rate ratio [95% CI]: 1.35 [1.28-1.43]), and outpatient visits (1.12 [1.11-1.12]) and incurred higher total medical and pharmacy costs (mean difference [95% CI]: $10,055 [$6,741-$13,646] per patient per year). Patients with aTRH and stage 3-4 CKD and uncontrolled BP despite treatment with ≥3 antihypertensive classes had an increased risk of MACE+ and ESRD and incurred greater healthcare resource utilization and medical expenditures compared with patients taking ≥3 antihypertensive classes with controlled BP.

Apparent Treatment-Resistant Hypertension in the First Year Associated With Cardiovascular Mortality in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

Few reports have focused on the association between apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) and cardiovascular (CV) mortality in peritoneal dialysis (PD) population, thus we conducted this retrospective cohort to explore it. This was a retrospective cohort study conducted from January 2011 to January 2020 with PD patients in 4 Chinese dialysis centers. aTRH was defined according to the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines. aTRH duration was calculated as the total number of months when patients met the diagnostic criteria in the first PD year. The primary outcome was CV mortality, and the secondary outcomes were CV events, all-cause mortality, combined endpoint (all-cause mortality and transferred to hemodialysis [HD]), and PD withdrawal (all-cause mortality, transferred to HD, and kidney transplantation). Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association. A total of 1,422 patients were finally included in the analysis. During a median follow-up period of 26 months, 83 (5.8%) PD patients incurred CV mortality. The prevalence of aTRH was 24.1%, 19.9%, and 24.6% at 0, 3, and 12 months after PD initiation, respectively. Overall, aTRH duration in the first PD year positively associated with CV mortality (per 3 months increment, adjusted hazards ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval 1.10, 1.53; P = 0.002). After categorized, those with aTRH duration more than 6 months presented the highest adjusted HR of 2.92. Similar results were found for secondary outcomes, except for the CV event. Longer aTRH duration in the first PD year is associated with higher CV mortality and worse long-term clinical outcomes. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings. There is no clinical trial registration for this retrospective study.

Medical Measures in Hypertensives Considered Resistant.

Patients with resistant hypertension are the group of hypertensive patients with the highest cardiovascular risk. All rules and guidelines for treatment of hypertension should be followed strictly to obtain blood pressure (BP) control in resistant hypertension. The mainstay of treatment of hypertension, also for resistant hypertension, is pharmacological treatment, which should be tailored to each patient's specific phenotype. Therefore, it is pivotal to assess nonadherence to pharmacological treatment as this remains the most challenging problem to investigate and manage in the setting of resistant hypertension. Once adherence has been confirmed, patients must be thoroughly worked-up for secondary causes of hypertension. Until such possible specific causes have been clarified, the diagnosis is apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH). Surprisingly few patients remain with true TRH when the various secondary causes and adherence problems have been detected and resolved. Refractory hypertension is a term used to characterize the treatment resistance in hypertensive patients using ≥5 antihypertensive drugs. All pressor mechanisms may then need blockage before their BPs are reasonably controlled. Patients with resistant hypertension need careful and sustained follow-up and review of their medications and dosages at each term since medication adherence is a very dynamic process.

Whole genome sequence analysis of apparent treatment resistant hypertension status in participants from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine program.

Introduction: Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) is characterized by the use of four or more antihypertensive (AHT) classes to achieve blood pressure (BP) control. In the current study, we conducted single-variant and gene-based analyses of aTRH among individuals from 12 Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine cohorts with whole-genome sequencing data. Methods: Cases were defined as individuals treated for hypertension (HTN) taking three different AHT classes, with average systolic BP ≥ 140 or diastolic BP ≥ 90mmHg, or four or more medications regardless of BP (n = 1,705). A normotensive control group was defined as individuals with BP < 140/90mmHg (n = 22,079), not on AHT medication. A second control group comprised individuals who were treatment responsive on one AHT medication with BP < 140/ 90mmHg (n = 5,424). Logistic regression with kinship adjustment using the Scalable and Accurate Implementation of Generalized mixed models (SAIGE) was performed, adjusting for age, sex, and genetic ancestry. We assessed variants using SKAT-O in rare-variant analyses. Single-variant and gene-based tests were conducted in a pooled multi-ethnicity stratum, as well as self-reported ethnic/racial strata (European and African American). Results: One variant in the known HTN locus, KCNK3, was a top finding in the multi-ethnic analysis (p = 8.23E-07) for the normotensive control group [rs12476527, odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 0.80 (0.74-0.88)]. This variant was replicated in the Vanderbilt University Medical Center's DNA repository data. Aggregate gene-based signals included the genes AGTPBP, MYL4, PDCD4, BBS9, ERG, and IER3. Discussion: Additional work validating these loci in larger, more diverse populations, is warranted to determine whether these regions influence the pathobiology of aTRH.

A cost-analysis of managing secondary and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension in a specialist multidisciplinary hypertension clinic.

A knowledge gap exists around the costs and budget impact of specialist hypertension clinics. This study reports on the cost of providing care in a multidisciplinary hypertension clinic staffed by nephrologist, endocrinologist and cardiologist, which manages patients with suspected secondary hypertension and/or apparent treatment-resistant hypertension. The aim of this study is to provide the evidence required to inform policy and planning care pathways for this patient group. A cost analysis from a healthcare provider perspective using micro-costing techniques was conducted to estimate the direct implementation costs of existing standard practice for the care pathway of patients attending the multidisciplinary hypertension clinic. Sixty-five patients originally recruited for a study of medication adherence in hypertension were included in the sample. The total care-pathway cost per patient, taking into account clinic visits, clinical reviews, investigations and MDT discussion, was estimated to be €3277, on average. For the patient subgroups, the average cost was €5644 for patients diagnosed with primary aldosteronism and €1446 for patients diagnosed with essential hypertension. There is significant cost associated with providing specialized hypertension care for patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension. Given the high rates of nonadherence in this population, it is likely that some of this cost could be avoided with better detection and management of medication adherence in this challenging population. Future studies should consider the cost-effectiveness of this or similar models of care by exploring the benefit to patients and the wider healthcare context of providing care of this type.

Comparison of pulse wave velocity and hypertensive response to exercise in predicting incidence of resistant hypertension

Abstract Background Resistant hypertension (RH) is strongly associated with occurrence of major cardiovascular events and death. Hypertensive response to exercise (HRE) and arterial stiffness estimated by peripheral pulse wave velocity (PWV) are surrogate markers of incident hypertension, whereas their role in predicting RH development remains uncertain. Purpose Explore the predictive role of PWV and HRE in incident RH. Methods A Comparison of HRE and PWV in predicting development of RH was performed in retrospective study with a cohort of 198 patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD). The patients performed two Bruce protocol stress tests (STs) between 01/2009 and 12/2022. The first ST was used to assess HRE and estimated PWV (ePWV) in predicting occurrence of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH). ePWV was calculated using age and blood pressure, as previously described (1). HRE response was defined either as systolic BP (SBP) &amp;gt; 210 mmHg or difference between peak and baseline &amp;gt; 60mmHg for men (&amp;gt;190 mmHg or 50 mmHg in women) (2). aTRH was defined as resting SBP above 140mmHg in the last ST despite simultaneous use of ≥3 different antihypertensive agents. The average time between STs was 4±3 years. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke) were analyzed during the follow-up period of 10±3 years. Logistic and Cox regression models were used in time-to-event analysis. Data presented as: mean ± standard deviation; 95% confidence interval (CI) for odds ratios (OR); significance between groups p&amp;lt;0.05. Results The incidence of aTRH between STs was 15% (n=30), with 48% of them (n=14) receiving ≥4 or more antihypertensive drugs. aTRH vs non-aTRH were similar at baseline for sex (89% male, p=0.67), hypertension (HT, 62%,p=0.08), dyslipidemia (79%, p=0.86), smoke (46%, p=0.50), chronic kidney disease (13%, p=0.39), myocardial infarction (75%, p=0.39), heart failure (4.5%, p=0.40), but not for body mass index (30±3 vs 28±3 kg/m2, p=0.012) and diabetes (60.0 vs 28.6%, p=0.003) that were higher in the aTRH group. The average ePWV was 9.3±1.6 m/s (9.14±1.5 vs 10.2±1.7 m/s, non-aTRH vs aTRH p=0.001); 22.6% patients had HRE (20.4% vs 36.0%, non-aTRH vs aTRH, p=0.084). In contrast to HRE (adjusted OR=1.34, CI 0.4-4.3, p=0.62), ePWV was correlated with aTRH (adjusted OR=2.0, CI 1.1-4.1, p=0.024) after adjusting for age, comorbidities and anti-HT drugs, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.7 (CI 0.6-0.8). Both aTHR (OR=2.6, CI 1.2-5.8, p=0.017) and ePWV (adjusted OR=1.3, CI 1.2-5.8, p=0.024) were associated with MACE. Conclusion ePWV is a simple and robust marker that outperforms HRE in predicting aTRH and MACE in CAD patients. Higher ePWV values were independently associated with the incidence of aTRH. This study strengthens the importance of developing new strategies to control arterial stiffness in the treatment of RH and prevention of MACE.