Apparent Life-threatening Events Research Articles

Brief Resolved Unexplained Events Symptoms Frequently Result in Inappropriate Gastrointestinal Diagnoses and Treatment

ObjectiveTo determine associations between presenting symptoms and oropharyngeal dysphagia diagnoses, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) diagnoses, and treatment with acid suppression medication in infants with brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE). Study designWe performed a prospective cohort study of infants with BRUE to review presenting symptoms and their potential impact on testing and treatment. Videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) results and explanatory diagnoses were obtained from medical record review; acid suppression use was determined by parental survey. Binary and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between presenting symptoms and obtaining VFSS, VFSS results, GERD diagnoses, and acid suppression medication. ResultsPresenting symptoms were varied in 157 subjects enrolled at 51.0±5.3 days of age, with many symptoms that may be related to GERD or dysphagia. Of these, 28% underwent VFSS with 71% abnormal. Overall, 42% had their BRUE attributed to GERD and 33% were treated with acid suppression during follow-up. Presenting symptoms were significantly associated with the decision to obtain VFSS but not with abnormal VFSS results. Presenting symptoms were also associated with provision of GERD explanatory diagnoses. Both presenting symptoms and GERD explanatory diagnoses were associated with acid suppression use (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.03-5.3, p=0.04). ConclusionsPresenting symptoms may play a role in clinicians’ decisions about which BRUE patients undergo VFSS but are unreliable to make a diagnosis of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Presenting symptoms may also influence assignment of a GERD explanatory diagnoses that is associated with increased acid suppression medication use.

Brainstem depolarization–induced lethal apnea associated with gain-of-function SCN1AL263V is prevented by sodium channel blockade

Apneic events are frightening but largely benign events that often occur in infants. Here, we report apparent life-threatening apneic events in an infant with the homozygous SCN1AL263V missense mutation, which causes familial hemiplegic migraine type 3 in heterozygous family members, in the absence of epilepsy. Observations consistent with the events in the infant were made in an Scn1aL263V knock-in mouse model, in which apnea was preceded by a large brainstem DC-shift, indicative of profound brainstem depolarization. The L263V mutation caused gain of NaV1.1 function effects in transfected HEK293 cells. Sodium channel blockade mitigated the gain-of-function characteristics, rescued lethal apnea in Scn1aL263V mice, and decreased the frequency of severe apneic events in the patient. Hence, this study shows that SCN1AL263V can cause life-threatening apneic events, which in a mouse model were caused by profound brainstem depolarization. In addition to being potentially relevant to sudden infant death syndrome pathophysiology, these data indicate that sodium channel blockers may be considered therapeutic for apneic events in patients with these and other gain-of-function SCN1A mutations.

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUEs) in Children: A Comparative Analysis of Pre-Pandemic and Pandemic Periods.

Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUEs), formerly known as Apparent Life-Threatening Events (ALTEs), are concerning episodes of short duration (typically <1 min) characterized by a change in breathing, consciousness, muscle tone, and/or skin color. In some cases, SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with episodes of BRUEs in previously healthy children. This study aimed to compare the demographic, respiratory, perinatal, and infectious characteristics in children affected by BRUEs before the COVID-19 pandemic and after the spread of SARS-CoV-2. We conducted a retrospective observational study covering January 2018 to March 2020 (pre-COVID-19) and April 2023 (during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic). Collected variables included clinical information during pregnancy and neonatal details of children with BRUEs. The number of children in the pre-COVID-19 period was 186 (41%); after the emergence and spread of SARS-CoV-2 this number was 268 (59%). The risk of infection at birth for children developing BRUEs was higher during the pandemic. Children were less likely to have ongoing symptomatic infection during BRUEs during the pandemic (coefficient B = 0.783; p = 0.009). Respiratory symptoms during BRUEs were more frequent during the pandemic (coefficient B = 0.654; p = 0.052). Fever during BRUEs was less likely during the pandemic (coefficient B = -0.465, p = 0.046). These findings could have significant clinical implications for managing children with BRUEs during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Epidemiology of brief resolved unexplained events and impact of clinical practice guidelines in general and pediatric emergency departments.

The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of brief resolved unexplained events (BRUEs) and compare the impact of a national clinical practice guideline (CPG) on admission and diagnostic testing practices between general and pediatric emergency departments (EDs). Using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample for 2012-2019, we conducted a cross-sectional study of children <1 year of age with an International Classification of Diseases diagnostic code for BRUE. Population incidence rate was estimated using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention birth data. ED incidence rate was estimated for all ED encounters. We used interrupted time series to evaluate the associated impact of the CPG publication on the outcomes of ED disposition (discharge, admission, and transfer) and electrocardiogram (ECG) use. Of 133,972 encounters for BRUE, 80.0% occurred in general EDs. BRUE population incidence was 4.28 per 1000 live births and the annual incidence remained stable (p = 0.19). BRUE ED incidence was 5.06 per 1000 infant ED encounters (p = 0.14). The impact of the BRUE CPG on admission rates was limited to pediatric EDs (level shift -23.3%, p = 0.002). Transfers from general EDs did not change with the CPG (level shift 2.2%, p = 0.17). After the CPG was published, ECGs increased by 13.7% in pediatric EDs (p = 0.005) but did not change in general EDs (level shift -0.2%, p = 0.82). BRUEs remain a common pediatric problem at a population level and in EDs. Although a disproportionate number of infants present to general EDs, there is differential uptake of the CPG recommendations between pediatric and general EDs. These findings may support quality improvement opportunities aimed at improving care for these infants and decreasing unnecessary hospital admissions or transfers.

Radiological Findings in Patients Presenting with Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUEs)

Background/Hypothesis: Brief resolved unexplained events (BRUEs) are events in infants characterized by cyanosis, abnormal breathing, abnormal tone, and altered responsiveness. Practice guidelines define high-risk and low-risk BRUEs and do not recommend imaging in low-risk patients. We evaluated imaging in these patients and hypothesized that high-risk patients would have more imaging studies and abnormalities.&#x0D; Methods: Using the radiology information system, a retrospective review was performed between 2016-2022 for patients &lt;1 year presenting with BRUE. Defined search terms were used to identify imaging within one week of presentation. Patients were evaluated for clinical presentation, medical history, physical examination, imaging studies ordered, and final diagnoses.&#x0D; Results: 126 patients were identified. 113 patients (46 female; 93 high-risk), between 3 and 355 days old (average age 97 days), met inclusion criteria. Imaging included chest radiographs (99), head CTs (24), brain MRIs (19), skeletal surveys (16), and others (22). There was no difference in the number of imaging studies obtained between these groups (p=0.423, Mann-Whitney U test). However, a greater proportion of high-risk patients had imaging abnormalities (p=0.023, Fisher’s exact test). Only 1/20 (5%) low-risk patients had abnormal imaging (PCR proven viral bronchiolitis). 26/93 (28%) high-risk patients had abnormal findings, most commonly on chestradiographs (15), brain MRIs (9), head CTs (4), and skeletal surveys (3). 18/26 high-risk patients had imaging abnormalities leading to a diagnosis other than BRUE (viral bronchiolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, nonaccidental trauma, perinatal HSV infection, ventricular septal defect, double aortic arch, intestinal malrotation, and neurofibromatosis). Overall, 7/93 (7.5%) high-risk BRUE patients had significant pathology.&#x0D; Conclusion: High-risk patients were more likely to have an imaging abnormality compared to low-risk patients, which is consistent with current imaging recommendations given only one low-risk imaging abnormality. Interestingly, 7.5% of the high-risk patients had significant pathology diagnosed by imaging.

PROPUESTA DE UNA GUÍA CLÍNICA DE MANEJO DEL BRUE

The term BRUE (Brief resolved unexplained event) was proposed by the American Academy of Pediatrics in 2016 to replace the term ALTE (Apparent life-threatening event), which in turn replaced the so-called near-miss sudden infant death syndrome in 1986. This latest change is intended to avoid unnecessary hospitalizations and reduce the use of high-cost, low-yield laboratory and imaging tests. However, we believe that in the absence of clinical guidelines that guide the management of the BRUE, that objective may not be met. We present a clinical guideline prepared for Hospital Dr. Exequiel González Cortés, in Santiago, Chile.

Hospitalization and evaluation of brief resolved unexplained events (BRUEs) from a statewide sample

ObjectiveThe 2016 clinical practice guideline (CPG) replacing apparent life-threatening event (ALTE) with brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) was associated with a reduction in hospitalizations and clinical testing among children with this condition in pediatric hospitals. However, as only a minority of acute-care encounters occur in dedicated pediatric centers, the overall effect of this CPG on children with ALTE/BRUE remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to examine changes in the diagnosis and management of BRUE in a statewide sample of non-pediatric hospitals following publication of the CPG. MethodsThis is a retrospective study of encounters of infants (<1 year) presenting to 178 non-pediatric Illinois Emergency Departments (EDs) between 2013 and 2019 with an International Classification of Disease (ICD) 9th and 10th revision billing code of ALTE or BRUE (799.82, ICD-9; R68.13, ICD-10). Our primary outcomes were counts of ALTE/BRUE and the percent of patients with ALTE/BRUE admitted and/or transferred to another facility. Our secondary outcome was clinical testing. We used interrupted time-series analysis for our primary outcome and chi-square testing for secondary outcomes. Results were stratified into academic and community EDs. ResultsThis study included 4639 ED encounters for infants with BRUE that presented to academic EDs (2229; 48.0%) or community EDs (2410; 52.0%). At academic EDs, ALTE/BRUE diagnoses were increasing by 2.3 per quarter prior to the CPG publication and decreased by 0.5 per quarter after the CPG publication, representing a change in slope of −2.8 per quarter (p < 0.01). The percent of ALTE/BRUE patients admitted/transferred was decreasing by 0.1% per quarter in the pre-intervention period and decreased by 0.3% per quarter in the post-intervention period, representing a change in slope of 0.7% (p = 0.03). At community EDs, ALTE/BRUE diagnoses were increasing by 2.9 per quarter prior to the CPG publication and increased by 1.4 per quarter after the CPG publication, a non-significant change in slope. The percent of ALTE/BRUE patients admitted/transferred was decreasing by 1.6% in the pre-intervention period and decreased by 0.9% in the post-intervention period, a non-significant change in slope. At academic EDs, there was no significant change in clinical testing. At community EDs, a lower proportion of patients in the post-intervention period had chest radiographs, blood cultures, metabolic panels, blood counts, and urine testing, while a higher proportion had pertussis testing and respiratory pathogen testing. ConclusionsCounts of BRUE diagnoses and the overall proportion of children admitted or transferred showed a consistent decrease at academic EDs but had a nonsignificant change in trend at community EDs following the CPG publication in 2016. There was no significant change in clinical testing at academic EDs while community EDs had a significant decrease in some testing and an increase in other types of testing. Our findings suggest the need for greater implementation efforts in non-pediatric settings, specifically community EDs, where pediatric patients with BRUE present infrequently in order to optimize care for these children.

Increased parental perception of sleep disordered breathing in a cohort of infants with ALTE/BRUE events.

An apparent life-threatening event (ALTE) describes an acute, unexpected change in an infant's breathing, aspect, or behavior frightening to the parent or caretaker. According to the new recent terminology, clinicians should use the term brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) to describe an event occurring in an infant <1 year of age when the observer reports a sudden, brief, and now resolved episode. The aims of the present study in infants were to investigate sleep disturbances in both ALTE event and after their classification according the new BRUE criteria. We enrolled (from April to May 2016) 32 consecutive infants referred to our ambulatory for sleep disorders for follow-up after an ALTE episode and 32 pair healthy controls. We administered to parents the adapted questionnaire "Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children - SDSC." Among enrolled infants with ALTE, there were 26 infants in line with the new BRUE definition, of which 10 at low risk and 16 at the high-risk event. Infants with ALTE and BRUE had more referred-by-parents' sleep symptoms than controls. In particular, sleep disordered breathing wa prevalent in both, requiring a longer follow-up for this disturbance.

Discontinuation of Car Seat Tolerance Screening and Postdischarge Adverse Outcomes in Infants Born Preterm

To study the association between discontinuing predischarge car seat tolerance screening (CSTS) with 30-day postdischarge adverse outcomes in infants born preterm. Retrospective cohort study involving all infants born preterm from 2010 through 2021 who survived to discharge to home in a 14-hospital integrated health care system. The exposure was discontinuation of CSTS. The primary outcome was a composite rate of death, 911 call-triggered transports, or readmissions associated with diagnostic codes of respiratory disorders, apnea, apparent life-threatening event, or brief resolved unexplained events within 30days of discharge. Outcomes of infants born in the periods of CSTS and after discontinuation were compared. Twelve of 14 hospitals initially utilized CSTS and contributed patients to the CSTS period; 71.4% of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients and 26.9% of non-NICU infants were screened. All hospitals participated in the discontinuation period; 0.1% was screened. Rates of the unadjusted primary outcome were 1.02% in infants in the CSTS period (n=21 122) and 1.06% after discontinuation (n=20 142) (P=.76). The aOR (95% CI) was 0.95 (0.75, 1.19). Statistically insignificant differences between periods were observed in components of the primary outcome, gestational age strata, NICU admission status groups, and other secondary analyses. Discontinuation of CSTS in a large integrated health care network was not associated with a change in 30-day postdischarge adverse outcomes. CSTS's value as a standard predischarge assessment deserves further evaluation.

Brief resolved unexplained event: Severity-associated factors at admission in the pediatric emergency ward

ObjectiveA brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) is a recent clinical entity that has now replaced the term “infant discomfort”. Despite the availability of recent recommendations, identification of patients requiring further examination remains difficult. MethodWe aimed to identify factors associated with severe pathology and/or recurrence by studying the medical files of 767 patients admitted to the pediatric emergency department of a French university hospital for a BRUE. ResultsOverall, 255 files were studied; 45 patients had a recurrence and 23 patients had a severe diagnosis. The most frequently found etiology was gastroesophageal reflux in the benign diagnosis group and apnea or central hypoventilation in the severe diagnosis group. Prematurity (p = 0.032) and time since last meal >1 h (p = 0.019) were the main factors associated with severe disease. Most of the routine examination results remained non-contributive to the etiology. ConclusionAs prematurity is a factor associated with severe diagnosis, special attention should be given to this population, without subjecting them to multiple tests, since the main complication was found to be apnea or central hypoventilation. Prospective research is needed to establish the usefulness and prioritization of diagnostic tests for infants who are at “high risk” of experiencing a BRUE.

Clinical Utility and Patient Distribution of Brief Resolved Unexplained Event Classification for Apparent Life-Threatening Events.

In 2016, brief resolved unexplained events (BRUEs) were proposed as alternative concepts to apparent life-threatening event (ALTE). The clinical utility of managing ALTE cases according to the BRUE classification is controversial. To verify the clinical utility of the BRUE criteria, we evaluated the proportion of ALTE patients who met and those who did not meet the BRUE criteria and assessed the diagnoses and outcomes of each group. We retrospectively investigated patients with ALTE younger than 12 months who visited the emergency department of the National Center for Child Health and Development from April 2008 to March 2020. The patients were classified into the higher-risk and lower-risk BRUE groups; however, those who did not meet the BRUE criteria were classified into the ALTE-not-BRUE group. We evaluated the diagnoses and outcomes of each group. Adverse outcomes included death, recurrence, aspiration, choking, trauma, infection, convulsions, heart disease, metabolic disease, allergies, and others. Over the period of 12 years, a total of 192 patients were included, among which 140 patients (71%) were classified into the ALTE-not-BRUE group, 43 (22%) into the higher-risk BRUE group, and 9 (5%) into the lower-risk BRUE group. Adverse outcomes occurred in 27 patients in the ALTE-not-BRUE group and 10 patients in the higher-risk BRUE group. No adverse outcome occurred in the lower-risk BRUE group. Many of the patients with ALTE were classified into the ALTE-not-BRUE group, suggesting that replacing ALTE with BRUE is difficult. Although patients classified as lower-risk BRUE showed no adverse outcomes, there were only a few of them. In the pediatric emergency medicine setting, the BRUE risk classification may be beneficial for certain patients.

External airway splint placement for severe pediatric tracheobronchomalacia

ObjectiveTo present external airway splinting with bioabsorbable airway supportive devices (ASD) for severe, life-threatening cases of pediatric tracheomalacia (TM) or tracheobronchomalacia (TBM). MethodsA retrospective cohort was performed for 5 pediatric patients with severe TM or TBM who underwent ASD placement. Devices were designed and 3D-printed from a bioabsorbable material, polycaprolactone (PCL). Pre-operative planning included 3-dimensional airway modeling of tracheal collapse and tracheal suture placement using nonlinear finite element (FE) methods. Pre-operative modeling revealed that triads along the ASD open edges and center were the most effective suture locations for optimizing airway patency. Pediatric cardiothoracic surgery and otolaryngology applied the ASDs by suspending the trachea to the ASD with synchronous bronchoscopy. Respiratory needs were trended for all cases. Data from pediatric patients with tracheostomy and diagnosis of TM or TBM, but without ASD, were included for discussion. ResultsFive patients (2 Females, 3 Males, ages 2–9 months at time of ASD) were included. Three patients were unable to wean from respiratory support after vascular ring division; all three weaned to room air post-ASD. Two patients received tracheostomies prior to ASD placement, but continued to experience apparent life-threatening events (ALTE) and required ventilation with supraphysiologic ventilator settings. One patient weaned respiratory support successfully after ASD placement. The last patient died post-ASD due to significant respiratory co-morbidity. ConclusionASD can significantly benefit patients with severe, unrelenting tracheomalacia or tracheobronchomalacia. Proper multidisciplinary case deliberation and selection are key to success with ASD. Pre-operative airway modeling allows proper suture placement to optimally address the underlying airway collapse.

Descriptive analysis of infant population younger than 1 year admitted for BRUE

IntroductionIn 2016, the American Academy of Pediatrics defined the brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) of high and low risk to characterize fainting in infants under 1 year of age. In the case of low-risk BRUE, it is recommended to perform no further systematic examination, but to monitor the child with a saturometer in the emergency room for 1–4 h. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to identify events corresponding to high- and low-risk BRUE criteria for infants admitted to the Angers University Hospital Center, and to analyze their medical care. MethodWe conducted an observational, retrospective, descriptive and single-center study of the population of infants younger than 1 year admitted for an unexplained event to the Pediatric Emergency Department of Angers University Hospital Center between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2019. Two patient databases were crossed to identify patients. ResultsAmong the 203 patients presenting for fainting, 54 patients met the criteria for BRUE, including 40 high-risk BRUE and 14 low-risk BRUE cases. All complementary examinations performed on low-risk BRUE children were normal. Two of these patients had a recurrence of non-severe fainting several months after the first episode. ConclusionIdentification of infants according to the BRUE criteria helps to harmonize practices and to limit the number of complementary examinations or hospitalizations for low-risk BRUE.

Outcomes for the apparent life‐threatening event infant

To examine the outcome for apparent life-threatening event infants and the determining factors for that outcome. A retrospective review of 903 infants (0-12 months of age) presenting to the pediatric wards at Christchurch Hospital between 1985 and 1996 with events characterized by some combination of apnoea, change in color, and muscle tone. Events, resulting in 1088 admissions, were classified from medical record review according to the severity and underlying conditions, with risk factors and long-term outcomes examined. The severity of events was reduced with implementing sudden infant death syndrome recommendations regarding the risk of prone sleeping. There were no sudden infant death syndrome deaths on home apnoea monitoring. Five apparent life-threatening event infants, not referred for home apnoea monitoring, subsequently died of sudden infant death syndrome. Two infants died and one suffered significant hypoxic insult when apnoea monitoring was interrupted under the age of 4 months. Asthma and neurodevelopmental conditions appeared to be over-represented subsequently in the apparent life-threatening event group. Identifying apparent life-threatening event infants at risk of sudden infant death syndrome lacked specificity. The use of apnoea home monitoring appeared protective in this cohort, but safe sleeping practices remained central for reducing sudden infant death syndrome risk.

Update on aortopexy and posterior tracheopexy for tracheomalacia in patients with esophageal atresia.

Despite improving the survival after repair of esophageal atresia (EA), the morbidity of EA repair remains high. Specifically, tracheomalacia (TM) is one of the most frequent complications of EA repair. Continuous positive airway pressure is generally applied for the treatment of TM. However, surgical intervention is required against an apparent life-threatening event or inability to perform extubation for a long period. According to our review, most cases of TM showed symptom improvement after aortopexy. The ratio of the trachea's lateral and anterior-posterior diameter at the brachiocephalic artery crossing the trachea, which reflects the compression of the trachea by the brachiocephalic artery, is a good indicator of aortopexy. Our finding suggests that most TM cases associated with EA may not be caused by tracheal fragility alone, but may involve blood vessel compression. Posterior tracheopexy (PT) is also an effective treatment for TM. Recently, open or thoracoscopic PT was able to be performed simultaneously with EA repair. In many cases, aortopexy or PT is a safe and effective surgical treatment for TM with EA. Other surgical procedures, such as external stenting, should be considered for patients with diffuse-type TM for whom aortopexy and PT appear relatively ineffective.

Brief Resolved Unexplained Event (BRUE)

Key Points Formerly known as apparent life-threatening event, brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) is used to emphasize the transient nature of the event and a lack of clear etiology and removes life-threatening from the label.Diagnosis of BRUE is established by detailed history and physical examination.Targeted laboratory and specialty evaluation depends on findings on clinical evaluation.A small number of infants need hospitalization for additional evaluation and observation.Infants who meet low-risk criteria can be discharged home after a period of observation.Mainstay of management are education of the family and providing resources for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training.

A Prospective Study of Brief Resolved Unexplained Events: Risk Factors for Persistent Symptoms.

The risk of persistent symptoms after a brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) is not known. Our objective was to determine the frequency and risk factors for persistent symptoms after BRUE hospitalizations. We conducted a prospective longitudinal cohort study of infants hospitalized with an admitting diagnosis of BRUE. Caregiver-reported symptoms, anxiety levels, and management changes were obtained by questionnaires during the 2-month follow-up period. Clinical data including repeat hospitalizations were obtained from a medical record review. Multivariable analyses with generalized estimating equations were conducted to determine the risk of persistent symptoms. Of 124 subjects enrolled at 51.6 ± 5.9 days of age, 86% reported symptoms on at least 1 questionnaire after discharge; 65% of patients had choking episodes, 12% had BRUE spells, and 15% required a repeat hospital visit. High anxiety levels were reported by 31% of caregivers. Management changes were common during the follow-up period and included 30% receiving acid suppression and 27% receiving thickened feedings. Only 19% of patients had a videofluoroscopic swallow study while admitted, yet 67% of these studies revealed aspiration/penetration. Many infants admitted with BRUE have persistent symptoms and continue to access medical care, suggesting current management strategies insufficiently address persistent symptoms. Future randomized trials will be needed to evaluate the potential efficacy of therapies commonly recommended after BRUE.

Brief Resolved Unexplained Event (BRUE): Is Reassurance Enough for Caregivers?

Brief Resolved Unexplained Event (BRUE): Is Reassurance Enough for Caregivers?

Canadian infants presenting with Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUEs) and validation of clinical prediction rules for risk stratification: a protocol for a multicentre, retrospective cohort study

IntroductionBrief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUEs) are a common presentation among infants. While most of these events are benign and self-limited, guidelines published by the American Academy of Pediatrics inaccurately identify...

Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUEs): New Name, Similar Challenges

Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUEs): New Name, Similar Challenges