Aortic Root Disease Research Articles

Comparison of long-term outcomes of the Bentall procedure between patients with and without Marfan syndrome.

The Bentall procedure, using a composite valve graft, has become one of the standard therapies for aortic root disease. Patients with Marfan syndrome are prone to aortic annular dilatation and dissection and often undergo aortic root replacement, including the Bentall procedure. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of the Bentall procedure between Japanese patients with and without Marfan syndrome. Data from 294 patients who underwent the Bentall procedure over 37years were retrospectively analyzed. The study compared the data of patients with Marfan syndrome (n = 94) and those without it (n = 200). Patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with early mortality, late mortality, reoperation, and aortic root reoperation. The early mortality rate was 4.1%, with no significant difference between patients with and without Marfan syndrome. The long-term survival rates at 10, 20, and 30years were 81.0%, 66.5%, and 49.1%, respectively, with no significant between-group differences. Aortic reoperations were more frequent in patients with Marfan syndrome; however, the number did not differ significantly between the groups. Risk factors for late mortality included diabetes and coronary reimplantation with an inclusion technique. Aortic dissection, Marfan syndrome, and smoking were risk factors for aortic reoperation. Late mortality after the Bentall procedure was comparable between Japanese patients with and without Marfan syndrome although aortic reoperation was significantly frequent in patients with Marfan syndrome. Continuous monitoring and management, including the prevention of aortic dissection and dilation of residual aorta, are crucial for patients with Marfan syndrome undergoing the Bentall procedure.

Midterm follow-up of composite graft replacement of the aortic root (30-year experience)—remarkably safe, effective, and durable

ObjectivesContemporary operative choices for aortic root disease include aortic root replacement (ARR) and a variety of valve-sparing and aortic root-repair procedures. We evaluate ultra-long-term outcomes of ARR, focusing on survival, freedom from late reoperation, and adverse events. MethodsProspectively kept records were used to accomplish long-term follow-up of patients who underwent ARR (4-pronged Yale survival assessment paradigm). ResultsBetween 1990 and 2020, 564 patients underwent ARR (mean 56 years, 84% male). A modified Cabrol procedure (Dacron coronary graft) was employed in 9.0% (51/564) and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in 9.4% (53/564). There were 12.8% (72/564) urgent/emergent and 7.4% (42/564) redo procedures. Operative mortality occurred in 12 patients (2.1%) overall, or 1.4% (8/554) of nondissection and 1.3% (6/468) of elective first-time operations. Six of the 12 deaths presented with acute type A dissection, urgent operation, or reoperative states. Operative mortality dropped to 0.6% during the past 10 years. In total, 11 patients developed endocarditis. Stroke occurred in 11 of 564 patients (2.0%), 4 of whom had presented with type A dissection. Late events included bleeding in 2.8% (16/564), thromboembolism in 1.4% (8/564), and reoperation of the root in 5 of 564 (0.9%) at 15 years and more distal aortic segments in 16/564 (2.8%). Survival was no different from age/sex-matched controls. ConclusionsThis ultra-long-term experience finds ARR to be extraordinarily safe, effective, and durable, with minimal long-term bleeding, thromboembolism, or graft failure. This experience provides a standard of durability for ARR against which ultra-long-term outcomes with alternate procedures (valve-sparing, Ross, other) may be compared.

Navigating the challenges of bicuspid aortic valve-aortopathy.

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a congenital heart defect that affects 0.5-2% of the general population with familial predominance. The modifications in hemodynamics and structure change at cellular level contribute to the dilation of aorta, resulting in bicuspid aortopathy, which can result in catastrophic aortic events. The American Heart Association recommends screening first-degree relatives of patients with bicuspid aortic valve and aortic root disease. BAV may or may not be associated with a syndrome, with the non-syndromic variety having a higher chance of predisposition to congenital and vascular abnormalities. Many genes have been implicated in the etiology of non-syndromic aortic aneurysm such as ACTA2, MYH11, FLNA, and SMAD3. Common diagnostic modalities include transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), multi system computer tomography (MSCT), and cardiac MRI. Medical management reduces the rate of disease progression and surgical management is indicated based on the diameter of the ascending aorta, which differs in American and European guidelines. Our article aims to explore the current understanding of the pathophysiology, clinical aspects, and surgical management of bicuspid aortic valve disease. Additionally, we have included a discussion on the management of this condition in special populations, such as athletes and pregnant women, who require distinct treatment recommendations.

Is valve-sparing aortic root replacement better than total aortic root replacement? Anoverview of reviews.

Total aortic root replacement (TRR) is certainly beneficial for aortic root disease, but does it still have an advantageous prognosis for patients compared to valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR)? An overview of reviews was conducted to assess each of their clinical efficacy/effectiveness. Systematic reviews (SRs)/Meta-analyses comparing the prognosis of TRR and VSRR in aortic root surgery were collected from 4 databases, all searched from the time of database creation to October 2022. Two evaluators independently screened the literature, extracted information and applied the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) tool, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE), and Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) to evaluate the quality of reporting, methodological quality, risk of bias, and level of evidence of the included studies. A total of 9 SRs/Meta-analyses were ultimately included. In terms of the reporting quality of the included studies, PRISMA scores ranged from 14 to 22.5, with issues mainly in reporting bias assessment, risk of study bias, credibility of evidence, protocol and registration, and funding sources. The methodological quality of the included SRs/Meta-analyses was generally low, with key items 2, 7, and 13 having major flaws and non-key items 10, 12, and 16. In terms of risk of bias assessment, the overall assessment of the included 9 studies was high-risk. The quality of the evidence was rated as low to very low quality for the three outcome indicators selected for the GRADE quality of evidence rating: early (within 30 days postoperatively or during hospitalization) mortality, late mortality, and valve reintervention rate. VSRR has many benefits including reduced early and late mortality after aortic root surgery and reduced rates of valve-related adverse events, but the methodological quality of the relevant studies is low, and there is a lack of high-quality evidence to support this. https://www.PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42022381330.

Aortic Root Surgery in Adults: An Unsolved Problem

Nowadays, despite the rapid advancements in interventional cardiology, open surgery still deals with aortic root diseases, to assure the best "ad hoc" treatment. In case of middle-aged adult patients, the optimal operation still represents a matter of debate. A review of the last 10-year literature was conducted, focusing on patients below 65 to 70 years of age. Because of the small sample and the heterogeneity of the papers, no metanalysis was possible. Bentall-de Bono procedure, valve sparing, and Ross operations are the surgical options currently available. The main issues in the Bentall - de Bono operation are lifelong anticoagulation therapy and cavitation in case of mechanical prosthesis implantation and structural valve degeneration in case of biological Bentall. As transcatheter procedures are currently performed as valve in valve, biological prosthesis may be preferable, if the diameter may prevent postoperative high gradients. Conservative techniques, such as remodeling and reimplantation, preferred in the young, guarantee physiologic aortic root dynamics and impose surgical analysis of the aortic root structures to get a durable result. The Ross operation, which shows excellent performance, involves autologous pulmonary valve implantation and is performed only in experienced and high-volume centers. Due to its technical difficulty, it requires a steep learning curve and presents some limitations in specific aortic valve diseases. All three have advantages and downsides, and no ideal solution has still been reported.

Comparison of cine cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography derived diameters of the aortic root in a large population-based cohort

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cine cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are established imaging methods of the aortic root. We aimed to evaluate the comparability of measurements in TTE and standard cine CMR sequences of the aortic root. Our study included 741 subjects (mean age 63.5 ± 8 years, 43.7% female) from the Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS). Subjects underwent CMR and TTE. Aortic root measurements were performed at the level of the aortic annulus (AoAn), sinus of Valsalva (SoV), and sinotubular junction (STJ) by standard cine CMR in left ventricular long axis and left ventricular outflow tract view. Measurements were performed applying the leading-edge to leading-edge (LL) convention and inner-edge to inner-edge (II) convention in TTE and the II convention in CMR. Inter correlation coefficients (ICCs) demonstrated high inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for CMR and TTE measurements of SoV and STJ (ICCs 0.9–0.98) and moderate reproducibility for AoAn (ICCs 0.68–0.91). CMR measurements of SoV and STJ showed strong agreement with TTE: while correlations were comparable (r = 0.75–0.85) bias was lower with TTE II (bias − 0.1 to − 0.74) versus TTE LL measurements (mean bias − 1.49 to − 2.58 mm). The agreement for AoAn was fair (r = 0.51–0.57) with variable bias (mean bias 0.39–3.9). Standard cine CMR and TTE derived aortic root measurements are reproducible and comparable with higher agreement for TTE II instead of LL measurements. These results support an interchangeable application of TTE and standard CMR for screening of aortic root diseases thereby possibly reducing redundant multimodality imaging.

Long-Term Outcomes after Aortic Valve and Root Replacement in a Very High-Risk Population.

Background: Aortic valve and root replacement (AVRR) is a standardised procedure to treat patients with aortic valve and root disease. In centres with a well-established aortic valve and root repair program (valve repairs and Ross operations), only patients with very complex conditions receive AVRR; this procedure uses a mechanical or biological composite valve graft (modified Bentall–de Bono procedure). The aim of the study was to evaluate the short- and long-term results after AVRR in a high-risk population with complex pathologies. Methods: Between 2005 and 2018, a total of 273 consecutive patients (mean age 64 ± 12.8 years; 23% female) received AVRR. The indication for surgery was an acute type A aortic dissection in 18%, infective endocarditis in 36% and other pathologies in 46% patients; 39% were redo procedures. The median EuroSCORE II was 11.65% (range 1.48–95.63%). Concomitant surgery was required in 157 patients (58%). Results: The follow-up extended to 5.2 years (range 0.1–15 years) and it was complete in 96% of the patients. The 30-day mortality was 17%. The overall estimated survival at 5 and 10 years was 65% ± 3% and 49% ± 4%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed the following risk factors for survival: perioperative neurological dysfunction (OR 5.45), peripheral artery disease (OR 4.4) and re-exploration for bleeding (OR 3.37). Conclusions: AVRR can be performed with acceptable short- and long-term results in a sick patient population. The Bentall–De Bono procedure may be determined to be suitable for only elderly or high-risk patients. Any other patients should receive an AV repair or the Ross procedure in well-established centres.

Brief experience in aortic root occlusion on a valved tube in aortic root aneurysm

Since 1968, when Bentall and De Bono introduced a novel technique to treat aortic root disease —be it as a result of dissection or aneurysm— surgical mortality improved so much that it became possible to establish this technique as the gold standard for surgical treatment of aortic root disease. Several modifications have been made of the original technique until the present surgery with remodeling or conservation of the aortic valve was developed. In this paper we present our experience with a slight variation of the Bentall technique applied in four patients with aortic root aneurysm that has allowed a reduction of the surgical time and bleeding, fast recovery and easy reproducibility.

Modified Bentall procedure improves postoperative bleeding and medium-term survival

Background: Bentall procedure is a standard technique for complete aortic root replacements but a huge challenge is postoperative bleeding. This study was to evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of the self-assembled composite graft with cuff formation for the Bentall procedure.
 Methods: A retrospective study of all patients undergoing Bentall procedure with button technique was performed from 2000-2019. Group 1 included 40 patients with commercial composite graft and group 2 included 45 patients with self-assembled composite graft with cuff. Perioperative outcomes were blood loss, reoperation for bleeding, complications, and operative mortality. Long-term outcomes included overall and reoperation-free survival.
 Results: Preoperative characteristics were similar in both groups, except mean age was higher in group 2 (48.2 versus 36.8 years). Group 2 significantly reduced blood loss in the first six hours postoperatively (250 versus 370 ml, P <0.001) and the risk of reoperation for bleeding (4.5% versus 17.5%, P = 0.002). Other complications were balanced between groups. Overall surgical mortality was 3. Reoperation was 7 cases. Group 2 also significantly improve the overall and reoperation-free survival: 95% and 95% (group 2) versus 75% and 70% (group 1) at four years respectively.
 Conclusions: Self-assembled composite graft with cuff formation is safe and effective for Bentall procedure in the treatment of aortic root diseases with the reduction of bleeding and improvement of long-term survival. Further investigations are required to improve the feasibility and effectiveness of the procedure.

Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of aortic root and heart valve disease

Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of aortic root and heart valve disease

Aortic root replacement with Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis: 25-year experience.

Stentless porcine bioprothesis is a surgical strategy to treat aortic root disease. Use has been limited due to the concern for long-term valve degeneration. This study evaluated the perioperative and late outcomes of patients with aortic root disease requiring root replacement. A total of 409 patients underwent aortic root replacement by a single surgeon using a stentless porcine bioroot between February 1996 and May 2020. The cohort was divided into two groups (age ≤65 and >65 years). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data and Kaplan-Meier curves used to evaluate long-term outcomes. Patients age >65 years were more likely to be female (p = .01), have hypertension (p = .01), require circulatory arrest (p = .01), and have concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (p = .04). Baseline creatinine >1.8 (p = .20), diabetes (p = .06), and ejection fraction (p = .20) were similar between groups. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival for patients age ≤65 years were 92%, 87%, and 69%, respectively, significantly better than patients age >65 (88%, 73%, and 43%, respectively) (p < .01, Figure 1). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year freedom from reoperation for patients ≤65 years were 99%, 97%, and 93% versus 99%, 98%, and 96% in patients age >65 years, respectively (p = .24). Patients with aortic root disease can be treated with acceptable perioperative outcomes, long-term survival, and low reoperation rates using a stentless porcine bioprothesis. It should be considered irrespective of age due to its excellent durability and freedom from anti-coagulation requirement.

Transthoracic echocardiographic reference values of the aortic root: results from the Hamburg City Health Study

Here we generate up-to-date reference values of transthoracic echocardiographic aortic root dimensions matched by sex, age, and body surface area (BSA) derived from the population-based Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS) cohort. In 1687 healthy subjects (mean age 57.1 ± 7.7, 681 male and 1006 female), derived from the first prospectively-recruited 10,000 HCHS participants, dimensions of the aortic root were measured in systole and diastole using state-of-the-art 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Diameters were assessed at four levels: aortic annulus, Sinus of Valsalva, sinotubular junction, and ascending aorta. Female sex was associated with significantly smaller absolute aortic root dimensions, while indexing for BSA resulted in a reverse effect at all levels. There was a strong age dependency of all aortic root diameters as well as aortic annulus/sinotubular junction ratio for both sexes. Multivariate analysis revealed age, sex, weight, height, and BSA to be significant determinants of aortic root size. Finally, formulas were generated for the calculation of individual aortic root reference values considering age, sex, weight, and height. We provide population-based reference values of aortic root diameters based on a standardized transthoracic echocardiographic protocol of the population-based HCHS which may support the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of aortic root disease.

The current status and prospect of catheter-based treatment of ascending aorta and aortic root diseases

In recent years, the endovascular procedures has considerably evolved in concepts, technologies, materials and devices on cardiovascular surgery, and influenced the development and the future direction of cardiovascular surgery technology. Endovascular aorta repair is well recognized as the optimal therapy for patients presenting with acute or chronic pathology of distal aortic arch, descending aorta and thoraco-abdominal aorta. The use of catheter-based endovascular repair in the ascending aorta pathology including aneurysms, pseudoaneurysms, penetrating aortic ulcers and acute or chronic Stanford type A aortic dissection has been concerned and reported. Comparing to the open surgical procedures for ascending aorta and aortic root disease with high perioperative mortality and morbidity, the catheter-based endovascular repair has minimally invasive, expanding the alternative treatment of ascending aorta disease, especially for patients with high-risk profiles. However, due to the complex anatomy and functional properties, materials and devices, the use of this technique in ascending aorta and aortic root is still questionable. In addition, the long-term and reliable clinical research results is still inadequate, and the safety and effectiveness need further research.

Structural abnormalities after aortic root replacement with stentless xenograft

ObjectiveIn complex and high-risk aortic root disease, the porcine Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) is an important surgical treatment option. We aimed to determine prevalence and clinical effect of structural and functional abnormalities after full-root Freestyle implantation. MethodsOur cross-sectional 2-center study combined with clinical follow-up included 253 patients with full-root Freestyle bioprostheses implanted from 1999 to 2017. Patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and contrast-enhanced, electrocardiogram-gated 4-dimensional cardiac computed tomography (4DCT) at median age 70 (interquartile range, 62-75) years. After 4DCT, clinical follow-up continued throughout 2018. Median follow-up was 3.3 years before 4DCT and 1.4 years after. ResultsWe identified abnormalities in 46% of patients, including pseudoaneurysms (n = 32; 13%), moderate or severe coronary ostial stenosis (n = 54; 21%), and moderate-severe leaflet thickening or reduced leaflet motion (n = 51; 20%). TTE only identified 1 patient with pseudoaneurysm. After 4DCT, the unadjusted hazard ratio for surgical reintervention among patients with abnormal 4DCT was 4.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-15.3), in all, 10% required a reintervention. 4DCT abnormalities were associated with a statistically nonsignificant increased risk of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction (hazard ratio obtained using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-7.6). In all, 4.0% died, 3.6% had a myocardial infarction, and 2.0% had a stroke. ConclusionsStructural and functional abnormalities of the aortic root are frequent after Freestyle implantation and TTE appears to be insufficient for follow-up. Abnormalities might be associated with increased risk of reintervention and potentially adverse clinical outcomes. Longer follow-up and larger study populations are needed to further clarify the clinical implications of abnormalities identified with 4DCT.

Cirugía de preservación valvular como alternativa en enfermedad de la raíz aórtica. Resultados alejados

Background: Since 1968, ascending aorta replacement with a valved conduit has been the standard practice for aortic root aneurysm. By the end of the 20th century, aortic valve sparing operation emerged and evolved as an alternative to aortic valve replacement. Objective: The aim of this study was to report our experience with aortic valve sparing technique and its long -term outcomes. Methods: A total of 116 consecutive cases with criteria of repairability operated on between 2005 and 2019 were analyzed. Preopera- tive transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) were used in combination to determine the aortic phenotype based on a previous anatomical and functional classification. Perioperative control was performed and conver- sion to aortic valve replacement was left to the discretion of the attending surgeon. Intraoperative variables, in-hospital morbidity and mortality, freedom from significant aortic regurgitation (AR) and reoperation in the clinical and echocardiographic follow-up were reported. Results: Mean age was 56±15.6 years and 73% were men; 59% were asymptomatic, and the reason for the intervention was the aortic diameter (52±11.7 mm) or progression of AR. After the procedure, 4% of the cases presented mild or trivial AR and 2 patients required conversion to aortic valve replacement (1.7%). In hospital mortality was 0.9%. Actuarial survival was 88% at 10 years, and 79% were free from significant (moderate/severe) AR. Five cases underwent reoperation after a mean interval of 9.1 years and free- dom from reoperation at 10 years was 90%. There were no major thromboembolic or bleeding events. Conclusion: Aortic valve sparing technique in the setting of aortic root disease is a feasible and safe option, and stable over time

Hemostatic measures in reconstructive aortic root surgery

Bleeding is a significant cause of complications and mortality in surgery for ascending aorta and aortic root disease. This is especially true after complex reconstructions associated with hypothermic circulatory arrest and long-standing cardiopulmonary bypass. The review is devoted to modern methods of hemostasis in reconstructive aortic root surgery.

Impact of Aortic Valve Function and the Need for Aortic Valve Repair on Long-Term Outcomes of Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement: 13-Year Experience of David Operation

The best approach for aortic root disease remains controversial. Composite valve-graft conduit (CVG) replacement offers good results at short-term and long-term follow-up; on the other hand, valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) has proven to be an excellent treatment alternative. This study aimed to analyse the outcomes after VSARR and compare whether preoperative moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and or the need for aortic valve repair (AVR) during this procedure influenced survival and freedom from reoperation rates. From September 2005 to June 2018, 104 patients underwent VSARR using the reimplantation technique: 64% presented with preoperative moderate or severe AR, concomitant AVR was performed in 43.3%, Marfan syndrome was present in 16.3%, and 12.5% had a bicuspid aortic valve. Complete follow-up was obtained in 91% of the sample, echocardiographic results were available for 86% and the mean follow-up time was 1,893 days. In-hospital mortality was 2.9% and one death occurred 42 days after hospital discharge. In the latest echocardiographic assessment, 88.3% presented with mild AR or better. Freedom from reoperation at 8 years was 95.4%. There was no case of endocarditis and one patient had a stroke 2 years after the operation. There were no between-group differences in morbidity, mortality and complications during the follow-up. VSARR can be performed with low mortality rates and reasonable durability of the aortic valve. Neither moderate or severe AR nor the need for aortic valve repair during the procedure altered survival and freedom from reoperation.

Modifiye Bentall Prosedürlerinin Uzun Dönem Sonuçları

Introduction: The aim of this study is to compare various modifications of Bentall procedure for early complications and long-term follow-up results. Patients and Methods: One hundred forty-nine patients underwent proximal aortic root replacement with composite valve-conduit graft between 1995 and 2014. Bentall procedure and its modifications (Cabrol procedure and hemi-inclusion) were evaluated for short- and long-term outcomes. Patients with concomitant procedures, arch repair, or valve-sparing procedures were excluded from the study. Results: In this study, 64 patients have met the inclusion criteria: 20 patients were included in the button Bentall group, 32 patients in the hemi-inclusion Bentall group, and 12 patients in the Cabrol group. Preoperative patient demographics were similar in all groups. The hemi-inclusion technique had better early outcomes, including less intraoperative blood transfusion, short cardiopulmonary bypass, and better in-hospital mortality rates (p 0.05). Conclusion: The hemi-inclusion Bentall technique might be used as a safe alternative approach for various aortic root diseases due to better hemostatic properties and lesser in-hospital mortality rates.

Del Nido cardioplegia in surgery for aortic root disease: a historically controlled study.

BackgroundTo determine the safely and effectively of del Nido cardioplegia (DNC) in surgery for aortic root disease, with mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).MethodsFrom July to December 2017, all patients undergoing the surgery for aortic root disease (total aortic root replacement, valve-sparing aortic root replacement and replacement of aortic valve plus ascending aorta), with mild hypothermic CPB, were retrospectively reviewed at our institution. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of cardioplegia: the classical blood cardioplegia (CBC group) and del Nido cardioplegia (DNC group). Demographics, operative details, perioperative data and postoperative complications were recorded and compared. A propensity score matching was performed in this study.ResultsThe preoperative data in DNC group were similar to CBC group. The volume of ultrafiltration was lower in DNC than CBC group (2,053.49±806.62 DNC vs. 2,666.00±967.14 CBC, P=0.001), when matched. The use of temporary pacemaker was more in DNC group (n=20, 46.5%, P=0.023), and the rate of automatic heart resuscitating was higher in the CBC group (92.0% vs. 72.1% DNC group, P=0.024, unmatched).There were no differences in in-hospital mortality, troponin T (mean 0.66 ng/mL for CBC group vs. 0.49 ng/mL for DNC group, P=0.152), left ventricular ejection fraction (mean 58.37% for CBC group vs. 60.07% for DNC group, P=0.395) or other postoperative complications between two groups, after matching. In subgroup analysis, the ultrafiltration volume was lower in DNC than CBC group (1,932.26±749.39 DNC vs. 2,640.00±996.24 CBC, P=0.004), when ACC time less than or equal to 90 minutes. The apache score was better in DNC group (4.75±3.41, P=0.041), when ACC time greater than 90 min. There were no statistical significances in other characteristics between groups.ConclusionsDNC is safe and effective for surgery for aortic root disease, not inferior to the CBC.

Comparison of the Bentall procedure versus valve-sparing aortic root replacement

Bentall and valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) procedures are established treatments for aortic root disease. We present a single-center retrospective analysis comparing outcomes of bioprosthetic Bentall (BB), mechanical Bentall (MB), and VSRR patients from November 2007 to October 2016. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate the composite endpoint of freedom from recurrent aortic insufficiency, reoperation, or death. Of the 170 patients, BB was performed in 36 patients, MB in 63 patients, and VSRR in 71 patients. For BB, MB, and VSRR, the mean age was 63.8, 45.5, and 49.2 years (P < 0.001), respectively. Additionally, significantly more patients in the MB group (n = 32, 50.8%, P < 0.001) than in the BB and VSRR groups had prior cardiac surgeries. Cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross-clamp time were significantly longer in the VSRR group (P = 0.04 and 0.0005, respectively). Despite the complexity of the procedure, VSRR patients had higher combined freedom from death and reoperation than patients in the BB or MB groups. Elective Bentall root replacement is an excellent option for patients with root disease. Patients undergoing Bentall tend to have more severe or emergent cases, making them unlikely candidates for VSRR. VSRR in experienced centers carries equivalent morbidity and mortality and improved survival.