Use Of Antithrombotic Medication Research Articles

The effect of current antithrombotic therapy on mortality in nursing home residents with COVID-19: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.

The first wave of COVID led to an alarmingly high mortality rate among nursing home residents (NHRs). In hospitalised patients, the use of anticoagulants may be associated with a favourable prognosis. However, it is unknown whether the use of antithrombotic medication also protected NHRs from COVID-19-related mortality. To investigate the effect of current antithrombotic therapy in NHRs with COVID-19 on 30-day all-cause mortality during the first COVID-19 wave. We performed a retrospective cohort study linking electronic health records and pharmacy data in NHRs with COVID-19. A propensity score was used to match NHRs with current use of therapeutic dose anticoagulants to NHRs not using anticoagulant medication. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality, which was evaluated using a logistic regression model. In a secondary analysis, multivariable logistic regression was performed in the complete study group to compare NHRs with current use of therapeutic dose anticoagulants and those with current use of antiplatelet therapy to those without such medication. We included 3521 NHRs with COVID-19 based on a positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 or with a well-defined clinical suspicion of COVID-19. In the matched propensity score analysis, NHRs with current use of therapeutic dose anticoagulants had a significantly lower all-cause mortality (OR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58-0.92) compared to NHRs who did not use therapeutic anticoagulants. In the secondary analysis, current use of therapeutic dose anticoagulants (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.48-0.82) and current use of antiplatelet therapy (OR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.64-0.99) were both associated with decreased mortality. During the first COVID-19 wave, therapeutic anticoagulation and antiplatelet use were associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality in NHRs. Whether these potentially protective effects are maintained in vaccinated patients or patients with other COVID-19 variants, remains unknown.

Risk factors for postoperative bleeding following endoscopic submucosal dissection in early gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Early gastric cancer (EGC) presents a significant challenge in surgical management, particularly concerning postoperative bleeding following endoscopic submucosal dissection. Understanding the risk factors associated with postoperative bleeding is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library without publication date restrictions. The inclusion criteria encompassed observational studies and randomized controlled trials focusing on EGC patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection and their risk factors for postoperative bleeding. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was utilized for quality assessment. The effect size was calculated using random or fixed-effects models based on the observed heterogeneity. We assessed the heterogeneity between studies and conducted a sensitivity analysis. In our meta-analysis, 6 studies involving 4868 EGC cases were analyzed. The risk of postoperative bleeding was notably increased with intraoperative ulcer detection (odds ratio: 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-3.76, I2 = 61.0%, P = .025) and antithrombotic medication use (odds ratio: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.16-3.51, I2 = 57.2%, P = .039). Lesion resection size showed a significant mean difference (5.16, 95% CI: 2.97-7.98, P < .01), and longer intraoperative procedure time was associated with increased bleeding risk (mean difference: 11.69 minutes, 95% CI: 1.82-26.20, P < .05). Sensitivity analysis affirmed the robustness of these findings, and publication bias assessment indicated no significant bias. In EGC treatment, the risk of post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding is intricately linked to factors like intraoperative ulcer detection, antithrombotic medication use, the extent of lesion resection, and the length of the surgical procedure. These interwoven risk factors necessitate careful consideration and integrated management strategies to enhance patient outcomes and safety in EGC surgeries.

Flow diversion of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single-center study with a standardized antithrombotic treatment protocol

BackgroundThe use of antithrombotic medication following acute flow diversion for a ruptured intracranial aneurysm (IA) is challenging with no current guidelines. We investigated the incidence of treatment-related complications and patient outcomes after flow diversion for a ruptured IA before and after the implementation of a standardized antithrombotic medication protocol.MethodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective study including consecutive patients treated for acutely ruptured IAs with flow diversion during 2015–2023. We divided the patients into two groups: those treated before the implementation of the protocol (pre-protocol) and those treated after the implementation of the protocol (post-protocol). The primary outcomes were hemorrhagic and ischemic complications. A secondary outcome was clinical outcome using the modified Ranking Scale (mRS).ResultsTotally 39 patients with 40 ruptured IAs were treated with flow diversion (69% pre-protocol, 31% post-protocol). The patient mean age was 55 years, 62% were female, 63% of aneurysms were in the posterior circulation, 92% of aneurysms were non-saccular, and 44% were in poor grade on admission. Treatment differences included the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (pre-group 48% vs. post-group 100%), and the use of early dual antiplatelets (pre-group 44% vs. 92% post-group). The incidence of ischemic complications was 37% and 42% and the incidence of hemorrhagic complications was 30% and 33% in the pre- and post-groups, respectively, with no between-group differences. There were three (11%) aneurysm re-ruptures in the pre-group and none in the post-group. There were no differences in mortality or mRS 0–2 between the groups at 6 months.ConclusionWe found no major differences in the incidence of ischemic or hemorrhagic complications after the implementation of a standardized antithrombotic protocol for acute flow diversion for ruptured IAs. There is an urgent need for more evidence-based guidelines to optimize antithrombotic treatment after flow diversion in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage.

COVID-19 and pregnancy: A European study on pre- and post-infection medication use.

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted medication needs and prescribing practices, including those affecting pregnant women. Our goal was to investigate patterns of medication use among pregnant women with COVID-19, focusing on variations by trimester of infection and location. We conducted an observational study using six electronic healthcare databases from six European regions (Aragon/Spain; France; Norway; Tuscany, Italy; Valencia/Spain; and Wales/UK). The prevalence of primary care prescribing or dispensing was compared in the 30-day periods before and after a positive COVID-19 test or diagnosis. The study included 294,126 pregnant women, of whom 8943 (3.0%) tested positive for, or were diagnosed with, COVID-19 during their pregnancy. A significantly higher use of antithrombotic medications was observed particularly after COVID-19 infection in the second and third trimesters. The highest increase was observed in the Valencia region where use of antithrombotic medications in the third trimester increased from 3.8% before COVID-19 to 61.9% after the infection. Increases in other countries were lower; for example, in Norway, the prevalence of antithrombotic medication use changed from around 1-2% before to around 6% after COVID-19 in the third trimester. Smaller and less consistent increases were observed in the use of other drug classes, such as antimicrobials and systemic corticosteroids. Our findings highlight the substantial impact of COVID-19 on primary care medication use among pregnant women, with a marked increase in the use of antithrombotic medications post-COVID-19. These results underscore the need for further research to understand the broader implications of these patterns on maternal and neonatal/fetal health outcomes.

Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy and Risk of Isolated Nontraumatic Subdural Hemorrhage

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a common cause of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in older patients. Although other types of intracranial hemorrhage can occur in conjunction with CAA-related intracerebral hemorrhage, the association between CAA and other subtypes of intracranial hemorrhage, particularly in the absence of intracerebral hemorrhage, remains poorly understood. To determine whether CAA is an independent risk factor for isolated nontraumatic subdural hemorrhage (SDH). A population-based cohort study was performed using a 2-stage analysis of prospectively collected data in the UK Biobank cohort (discovery phase, 2006-2022) and the All of Us Research Program cohort (replication phase, 2018-2022). Participants included those who contributed at least 1 year of data while they were older than 50 years, in accordance with the diagnostic criteria for CAA. Participants with prevalent intracranial hemorrhage were excluded. Data were analyzed from October 2022 to October 2023. A diagnosis of CAA, identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis code. The outcome was an isolated nontraumatic SDH, identified using ICD-10-CM codes. Two identical analyses were performed separately in the 2 cohorts. First, the risk of SDH in patients with and without CAA was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for demographic characteristics, cardiovascular comorbidities, and antithrombotic medication use. Second, multivariable logistic regression was used to study the association between CAA and SDH. The final analytical sample comprised 487 223 of the total 502 480 individuals in the UK Biobank cohort and 158 008 of the total 372 082 individuals in the All of Us cohort. Among the 487 223 participants in the discovery phase of the UK Biobank, the mean (SD) age was 56.5 (8.1) years, and 264 195 (54.2%) were female. There were 649 cases of incident SDH. Of the 126 participants diagnosed with CAA, 3 (2.4%) developed SDH. In adjusted Cox regression analyses, participants with CAA had an increased risk of having an SDH compared with those without CAA (hazard ratio [HR], 8.0; 95% CI, 2.6-24.8). Multivariable logistic regression analysis yielded higher odds of SDH among participants with CAA (odds ratio [OR], 7.6; 95% CI, 1.8-20.4). Among the 158 008 participants in the All of Us cohort, the mean (SD) age was 63.0 (9.5) years, and 89 639 (56.7%) were female. The findings were replicated in All of Us, in which 52 participants had CAA and 320 had an SDH. All of Us participants with CAA had an increased risk of having an SDH compared with those without CAA (HR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.2-19.8). In adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis, CAA was associated with higher odds of SDH (OR, 5.2; 95% CI, 0.8-17.6). In 2 large, heterogeneous cohorts, CAA was associated with increased risk of SDH. These findings suggest that CAA may be a novel risk factor for isolated nontraumatic SDH.

Influence of antithrombotic medication on size and neurological outcome of spinal epidural hematoma after neuraxial anesthesia: a systematic review.

Anticoagulation guidelines were developed to reduce the potential risk of epidural bleeding following neuraxial anesthesia. However, the influence of antithrombotic medication on size of spinal epidural hematoma and neurological outcome is unclear. Therefore, our aim was to analyze whether there is a correlation. The study was registered at Prospero (CRD42021285833). A systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science and Google Scholar was conducted in August 2023 for studies reporting spinal epidural hematoma following neuraxial anesthesia. Primary endpoints were segmental extension and neurological outcome. Secondary endpoints were age, sex, body mass index, predisposition, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, complicated puncture, multiple punctures, bloody puncture, successful puncture, catheter usage, needle size and worst neurological deficit before treatment. Prespecified multivariate regression and propensity score matching was performed. Publications reporting on more than one patient were critically appraised. A total of 345 cases reported in 304 publications were included. Size of hematoma was not significantly different (antithrombotic medication: OR 0.11, 95% CI (-0.67 to 0.89), p=0.78, 'non-guideline adherent' for puncture/removal: OR 0.13, 95% CI (-0.92 to 1.18), p=0.81). Patients receiving antithrombotic medication were more likely to have persistent neurological deficit (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.24 to 3.23), p<0.01). Significance persisted after propensity score matching (p=0.04). Patients with non-guideline adherence had a 3.42 higher chance of persistent neurological deficit (95% CI 1.71 to 6.86, p<0.001). Antithrombotic medication is not significantly associated with hematoma size; however, the use of antithrombotic medication doubled the risk for persistent neurological deficit after spinal epidural hematoma.

The Use of Oral Anticoagulation Is Not Independently Associated with Mortality in Frail Older Patients with Repeated Falls

Background: Particularly in frail patients, anticoagulation may be underused because of the fear of bleeding. Objective: To determine whether the use of antithrombotic medication is an independent risk factor for mortality in frail elderly with repeated falls. Methods: All patients aged 65 years or older at the Fall and Syncope Clinic were eligible. Frailty was calculated with a Frailty Index (FI) based on the accumulation of deficits model. Risks were calculated with a cox regression analysis, adjusted for age, sex, and Frailty Index. Results: 663 patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 80 years, 438 were women (66%), 73% had polypharmacy, and 380 patients (57%) had cognitive impairment. The mean FI was 0.23 (sd 0.09), 182 patients were moderately frail (27.5%), and 259 (39.1%) were severely frail. A total of 140 (21%) used oral anticoagulation and 223 (34%) used antiplatelet agents. A total of 196 patients (29.6%) died during follow-up. In the adjusted cox regression model, the use of neither antiplatelets nor anticoagulation was associated with mortality. A strong association was found with frailty (HR 74.0, 95% CI 13.1–417.3) and a weak association with age (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03–1.08). A lower risk of mortality was seen in women (HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3–0.6). Conclusions: In this cohort of frail older patients, there was no independent association between the use of antithrombotic medication and mortality. A strong association with mortality was found with frailty, a weak association was found with age, and a lower mortality risk was found in women. Our data indicate that the fear of bleeding or increased mortality in frail patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation may be unjustified.

Tranexamic Acid Is Safe in Patients with a History of Venous Thromboembolism Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is increasingly utilized during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) to decrease blood loss; however, there are concerns with regard to potential thromboembolic complications, particularly in high-risk patients. This study sought to define a subset of patients at elevated risk for thromboembolic complications following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and to compare postoperative outcomes between patients who received TXA and those who did not. Patients who underwent primary, elective TJA from 2015 to 2021 were identified in the Premier Healthcare Database. Patients with a history of venous thromboembolism, defined as a history of pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis, were identified and formed the high-risk cohort. Patient demographic characteristics, hospital factors, patient comorbidities, antithrombotic medication use, perioperative blood transfusion, and 90-day complications were assessed and compared between patients who received TXA and those who did not. Univariate regression and multivariable regression were performed to account for potential confounders. The high-risk cohort comprised 70,759 patients who underwent TJA, of whom 46,074 (65.1%) received TXA and 24,685 (34.9%) did not. After controlling for confounding factors, patients in the TXA cohort had similar risks of pulmonary embolism (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.90 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79 to 1.02]; p = 0.097), stroke (adjusted OR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.37]; p = 0.867), and myocardial infarction (adjusted OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.24]; p = 0.614) compared with patients who did not receive TXA. Patients who received TXA demonstrated decreased risks of transfusion (adjusted OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.46]; p < 0.001) and 90-day readmission (adjusted OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.80 to 0.94]; p < 0.001). TXA utilization was not associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary embolism, stroke, or myocardial infarction in patients with a history of venous thromboembolism. Furthermore, patients who received TXA had a decreased risk of transfusion and readmission. This evidence suggests that TXA may be safely utilized among select high-risk patients. Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Traumatic Carotid Artery Dissection — A Case Report

AbstractTraumatic carotid artery dissection (TCAD) usually occurs after a direct cervical trauma or blunt trauma that causes hyperextension and excessive rotation of the neck. The most frequent presentation of TCAD is stroke, with 80% of patients developing a stroke in the first week after the trauma. Recent data indicate that symptoms start later in non-survivors (19.5 hours after trauma) compared with survivors (12.5 hours). In this case report, a young boy, 14 years-old, developed TCAD after he fell from his bike. He developed ischemic stroke symptomatology in the eighth day of hospitalization, with full recovery of symtoms after acetylsalicylic acid (AAS) administration. The use of antithrombotic medication is recommended, aiming for better neurological outcomes and prevention of stroke in TCAD patients, as highlighted by our case. However, the treatment recommendations are based on observational studies and expert opinion, owing to the lack of concrete data on the treatment of carotid artery blunt trauma. New studies and data are required to improve diagnosis and treatment of TCAD.

Diagnostic value of repeated comprehensive investigation with CT urography and cystoscopy for recurrent macroscopic haematuria.

To perform a descriptive analysis of a series of patients with recurrent macroscopic haematuria after a primary standard evaluation including computed tomography urography (CTU) and cystoscopy negative for urinary bladder cancer (UBC) and upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) and to identify potential factors associated with occurrence of recurrent macroscopic haematuria. All patients older than 50 years who underwent urological investigation for macroscopic haematuria with both cystoscopy and CTU 2015-2017 were retrospectively reviewed. A descriptive analysis of the primary and later investigations for recurrent macroscopic haematuria was performed. To investigate the association between explanatory variables and the occurrence of recurrent macroscopic haematuria, a Poisson regression analysis was performed. A total of 1395 eligible individuals with primary standard investigation negative for UBC and UTUC were included. During a median follow-up of 6.2 (IQR 5.3-7) years, 248 (18%) patients had recurrent macroscopic haematuria, of whom six patients were diagnosed with UBC, two with prostate cancer, one with renal cell carcinoma and one had a suspected UTUC at the repeated investigation. Within 3 years, 148 patients (11%) experienced recurrent macroscopic haematuria, of whom two patients were diagnosed with low-grade UBC (TaG1-2), one with T2G3 UBC and one with low-risk prostate cancer. The presence of an indwelling catheter, use of antithrombotic medication, pathological findings at CTU or cystoscopy or history of pelvic radiotherapy were all statistically significant independent predictors for increased risk for recurrent macroscopic haematuria. In the case of recurrent macroscopic haematuria within 3 years of primary standard evaluation for urinary tract cancer, there was a low risk of later urological malignancies in patients initially negative for UBC and UTUC. Therefore, waiting 3 years before conducting another complete investigation in cases of recurrent macroscopic haematuria might be appropriate.

348 Effect of Prior Antithrombotic Medication Use on Patients Receiving Emergent Comprehensive Stroke Treatment

348 Effect of Prior Antithrombotic Medication Use on Patients Receiving Emergent Comprehensive Stroke Treatment

FTP3.10 Does Anti-Thrombotic Medication affect the PPV of the Feacal Immunochemical Test: A Single Centre Retrospective Study

Abstract Aims Our aim of this study was to determine whether anti-thrombotic medication (i.e. anit-coagulative's such as DOACS and anti-platelets) had a causal relationship to the outcome of the FIT score by looking at the PPV in its detection for malignancy and significant neoplasm. Methods We analysed records of 500 patients over 2 years (June 2020 - June 2022) from a single centre database of patients who are FIT positive and we reviewed all their endoscopy and CT images to determine the proportion of patients with a diagnosis of Colorectal Malignancy and advanced colorectal neoplasm. Results The key finding from our data we discovered that the PPV of having a Colorectal Malignancy/Advanced Neoplasm was significantly lower for patients who were on anti-thrombotic medication (33.1%) when compared to patients who were not on any anti-thrombotic medication (48.8%). Conclusion Our findings display that the use of anti-thrombotic medication lowered the incidence of significant colorectal neoplasms and malignancies detected on colonoscopy or CT imaging for patients who are FIT positive in our local population. It is the first out of the United Kingdom to demonstrate data that is consistent with current literature, thus we can suggest that these medications increase the number of False Positives from the FIT (with a FIT cut-off score of &amp;gt;10ugHb/g). From further analysis we will look to answer to the question. ‘Whether having anti-thrombotic medication can increase the likelihood of smaller cancers bleeding?'

Auto left atrial strain by speckle tracking echocardiography and auto left atrial volumes by 3D transthoracic echocardiography after electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction We have evidence that left atrial dysfunction and stunning occur after electric cardioversion for atrial fibrillation (CAF). Additionally, after successful cardioversion to sinus rhythm, a dissociation between electrical and mechanical recovery may be observed. Traditional pulsed Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging parameters demonstrate reduced atrial contractility immediately after cardioversion. Improvement in atrial function occurs within the first 4 weeks after sinus rhythm is restored. Recent advances in the assessment of myocardial function have facilitated the direct measurement of auto left atrial strain using speckle tracking echocardiography, and auto left atrial volumes measurements using dynamic heart model modern 3D transthoracic echo logistics. Purpose Aim of this study was to determine whether auto left atrial strain (auto LAs) by speckle tracking echocardiography, and auto left atrial volumes measurements, auto left atrial volume indices calculations (auto LAVI), could be used to evaluate global left atrial function and when a main improvement occurs after electrical cardioversion for CAF. Methods Auto LAs was measured from transthoracic echocardiography in 25 patients with CAF who had been cardioverted to sinus rhythm and followed up for 4 weeks, and in a cohort of 25 healthy individuals. Left atrial contractile strain (LACTS), conduit strain (LACDS) and reservoir strain (LARSS) were measured. Conventional measures of atrial function derived from transmitral pulsed wave doppler (PW) and tissue doppler imaging (TDI) of lateral mitral annulus were included, such as A wave velocity, A wave velocity time integral, A' wave velocity and A' velocity time integral. Results Immediately after cardioversion all PW, TDI and all three auto LAs parameters were significantly lower than in controls. On the other hand, auto LAVI was significantly higher in patients compared to controls immediately after cardioversion Atrial function was improved over time with maximal change observed 4 weeks after cardioversion and restoration to sinus rhythm. Auto LAs parameters were significantly higher in the group of patients. Auto LA volumes and auto LAVI with dynamic heart model logistics were lower in the same group, but with no statistical significance. Three patients with the lowest auto LAs values immediately after cardioversion, suffered recurrence of atrial fibrillation during the 4 weeks follow up. Conclusions Although left atrial electrical function is immediately restored after cardioversion in CAF patients, a persistent degree of atrial dysfunction remains for up to 4 weeks. This difference could explain the increased propensity for these patients to develop recurrent atrial fibrillation. Additional this dysfunction could indicate the longer-term use of antiarrhythmic and antithrombotic medication in the CAF cohort.

Peri-procedural management and incidence of bleeding events following musculoskeletal injections or aspirations in people on oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy.

Corticosteroid injections and aspirations are common interventions for managing musculoskeletal and inflammatory conditions. However, there remains limited safety evidence to support injection decisions and peri-procedural management in people on anti-thrombotics, particularly for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). To investigate peri-procedural management and bleeding complications following musculoskeletal injections or aspirations with anti-thrombotic medication use. A prospective observational study was undertaken (October 2018-December 2020) in Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Radiology specialities in two large UK healthcare providers. Data collection involved weekly identification of musculoskeletal procedures, emergency attendance or admission within 30days and follow-up questionnaires sent within 2weeks post-procedure. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse anticoagulant/anti-platelet use, peri-procedural management and bleeding complications. Of 5080 procedures, 237 of 1338 responses reported antithrombotic use: warfarin (n=36), DOACs (n=75) and antiplatelets (n=126). There were no self-report or electronic identification of clinically significant bleeding events/complications. Only local bruising was reported (8.6% vs. 0.2% with non-use), and only with medication continuation or international normalised ratio (INR) levels ≥3.8 or unknown. Only 3/72 DOAC use was interrupted. In this study, no clinically significant bleeding events or complications were reported or identified following musculoskeletal injections or aspirations, with only localised bruising reported. It was not universal practice to check INR levels and DOAC interruption was uncommon. Findings add evidence that musculoskeletal procedures appear to be low risk procedures for bleeding complications with antithrombotic continuation and when INR levels within lower target range. Research on intra-articular or soft tissue iatrogenic consequences would add to risk/benefit evaluations.

Is Continued Perioperative Antithrombotic Therapy Safe When Performing Open Tracheostomy?

To date, there are no specific guidelines on antithrombotic therapy (ATT) management, which includes both anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications, for open tracheostomy. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the use of perioperative antithrombotic medication during open tracheostomy influences the incidence of perioperative or postoperative complications. A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent open tracheostomies at a tertiary care medical center from January 2015 to December 2019. Charts were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, indication for tracheostomy, ATT use, operative details, and complications. A total of 217 tracheostomies were evaluated for this study, of which 148 (68.2%) were not on ATT and 69 (31.8%) were on ATT during surgery. No significant difference was observed based on ATT status in perioperative bleeding (P = .983), postoperative bleeding (P = .24), or median days to decannulation (P = .5986). ATT patients were 2.67 times more likely to experience 30-day mortality than those non-ATT patients (P = .035). There was only one death due to hemorrhage in the ATT group. This was unrelated to the tracheostomy. This compares to 2 hemorrhage-related deaths in those not on ATT. There was no significant difference in perioperative or postoperative bleeding based on ATT use. Patients on ATT were significantly more likely to experience 30-day mortality, however only one death was due to hemorrhage in the ATT group and was unrelated to tracheostomy. Therefore, continued perioperative ATT use appears to be safe when performing open tracheostomy. 4.

Values and Preferences Towards Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Qualitative Study

Background: Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET), confer a high risk for thrombotic events. The primary and secondary prevention of thrombotic events is managed with antithrombotic therapy, which is complicated by a high frequency of bleeding in Ph- MPN patients. When making shared decisions about antithrombotic therapy, physicians and patients must weigh thrombotic and bleeding risks and their consequences. However, little is known about the preferences and perceptions of patients with MPNs regarding antithrombotic therapy. The objectives of this study were therefore to identify: 1) patient-important factors and 2) barriers and facilitators to the use of antithrombotic therapy as thromboprophylaxis among patients with MPNs. Methods: In this qualitative study, semi-structured focus groups (FGs) were conducted with people diagnosed with PV and ET recruited via email from Canadian MPN Patient Support Groups. Focus groups were stratified based on previous history of a bleed requiring medical attention, previous history of thrombosis, or no history of bleeding or thrombosis. Open-ended questions and probes were used to guide FG discussions and FGs concluded with a polling exercise in which participants selected the most important facilitators and barriers to antithrombotic medication use. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis and the techniques of the Framework Method (Gale et al., 2013). Two team members independently reviewed and coded FG audio transcripts using NVivo to develop a coding framework. Coding comparison queries were run to assess agreement, discussion was used to resolve discrepancies, and the coding framework was iteratively refined. Data were reviewed by two members of the study team and preliminary themes were identified, guided by the research objectives. Results: We present preliminary results of our analysis. Four FGs were conducted with a total of 18 participants (range 3-6 participants). The average age of participants was 59 years, 13 (72%) were female and 10 (56%) had ET. Participants were taking aspirin (16/18, 89%), warfarin (1/18, 5%), and apixaban (1/18, 5%). Three participants (17%) had a prior thrombotic event, (ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and splanchnic vein thrombosis), and 3 (17%) had a prior bleeding event (epistaxis, gastrointestinal [GI] bleeding). The most important factors identified for taking antithrombotic therapy were preventing thrombotic events (94%) and a physician's recommendation (83%). Many participants perceived there was no choice when it came to the decision to use antithrombotic therapy; rather it was a physician-prescribed, necessary treatment to prevent thrombosis. Perceived downsides to antithrombotic therapy included the higher risk of bleeding, prolonged bleeding, and bruising, with specific concern about the visibility of bruises. Several participants also voiced concerns about the impact of long-term aspirin use on GI health and the potential for ulcer formation. A few participants reported lowering their dose of aspirin, as per physician recommendations or by self-adjusting the dose based on concerns about GI bleed risk. However, some participants did not perceive any downsides to using antithrombotic therapy or considered that the benefits outweighed the risks, while others were less certain. Additional analyses are underway. Conclusion: Patients with MPNs accept antithrombotic therapy use, motivated by trust in their physician's recommendations and the desire to prevent a stroke or myocardial infarction. While these values and preferences align with PV and ET treatment guidelines, it is important to recognize the influence that physician recommendations have on patients' perceptions towards antithrombotic therapy in the shared decision-making process.

Risk of stroke in genetically verified familial hypercholesterolemia: A prospective matched cohort study

Background and aimsIndividuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), causing severely elevated LDL-C, are expected to have a higher risk of ischemic stroke. The risk of hemorrhagic stroke and impact of statin use are, however, not known. We aimed to investigate the risk of incident total, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in individuals with FH compared to controls, and to explore the association between cumulative statin use and risk of total stroke in FH. MethodsThis prospective cohort study consists of 4186 individuals with genetically verified FH and 82 180 age and sex matched controls followed from 2008 to 2018 for incident stroke. Daily defined doses (DDD) described cumulative statin exposure: 0–5000 DDD (“low”), 5000–10,000 DDD (“intermediate”), and >10 000 DDD (“high”). Results were presented as hazard ratio (95% CI) derived from Cox proportional hazards models. ResultsIndividuals with FH did not have a higher risk of total stroke (1.16 (0.95–1.43) nor ischemic stroke (1.11 (0.88–1.38). Excess risk of hemorrhagic stroke was observed (1.63 (1.07, 2.48) but attenuated after adjusting for antithrombotic medication (1.25 (0.81, 1.93). Among individuals with FH, there was no association between statin use and total stroke for intermediate vs. low DDD [0.69 (0.32, 1.48)] or for high vs. low DDD [0.83 (0.41, 1.67)]. ConclusionsNo significant excess risk of incident total and ischemic stroke in FH, and no difference in total stroke risk among the FH population with low, intermediate, and high statin exposure were observed. The observed relationship between FH and hemorrhagic stroke was no longer significant after adjusting for use of anti-thrombotic medication.

Predictive Value of HAS-BLED Score Regarding Bleeding Events and Graft Survival following Renal Transplantation.

Objective: Due to the high prevalence and incidence of cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases among dialysis-dependent patients with end-stage renal disease (ERSD) scheduled for kidney transplantation (KT), the use of antiplatelet therapy (APT) and/or anticoagulant drugs in this patient population is common. However, these patients share a high risk of complications, either due to thromboembolic or bleeding events, which makes adequate peri- and post-transplant anticoagulation management challenging. Predictive clinical models, such as the HAS-BLED score developed for predicting major bleeding events in patients under anticoagulation therapy, could be helpful tools for the optimization of antithrombotic management and could reduce peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Methods: Data from 204 patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT) between 2011 and 2018 at the University Hospital Leipzig were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified and categorized postoperatively into the prophylaxis group (group A)—patients without pretransplant anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy and receiving postoperative heparin in prophylactic doses—and into the (sub)therapeutic group (group B)—patients with postoperative continued use of pretransplant antithrombotic medication used (sub)therapeutically. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative bleeding events, which was evaluated for a possible association with the use of antithrombotic therapy. Secondary analyses were conducted for the associations of other potential risk factors, specifically the HAS-BLED score, with allograft outcome. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression as well as a Cox proportional hazard model were used to identify risk factors for long-term allograft function, outcome and survival. The calibration and prognostic accuracy of the risk models were evaluated using the Hosmer–Lemshow test (HLT) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) model. Results: In total, 94 of 204 (47%) patients received (sub)therapeutic antithrombotic therapy after transplantation and 108 (53%) patients received prophylactic antithrombotic therapy. A total of 61 (29%) patients showed signs of postoperative bleeding. The incidence (p < 0.01) and timepoint of bleeding (p < 0.01) varied significantly between the different antithrombotic treatment groups. After applying multivariate analyses, pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) (OR 2.89 (95% CI: 1.02–8.21); p = 0.04), procedure-specific complications (blood loss (OR 1.03 (95% CI: 1.0–1.05); p = 0.014), Clavien–Dindo classification > grade II (OR 1.03 (95% CI: 1.0–1.05); p = 0.018)), HAS-BLED score (OR 1.49 (95% CI: 1.08–2.07); p = 0.018), vit K antagonists (VKA) (OR 5.89 (95% CI: 1.10–31.28); p = 0.037), the combination of APT and therapeutic heparin (OR 5.44 (95% CI: 1.33–22.31); p = 0.018) as well as postoperative therapeutic heparin (OR 3.37 (95% CI: 1.37–8.26); p < 0.01) were independently associated with an increased risk for bleeding. The intraoperative use of heparin, prior antiplatelet therapy and APT in combination with prophylactic heparin was not associated with increased bleeding risk. Higher recipient body mass index (BMI) (OR 0.32 per 10 kg/m2 increase in BMI (95% CI: 0.12–0.91); p = 0.023) as well as living donor KT (OR 0.43 (95% CI: 0.18–0.94); p = 0.036) were associated with a decreased risk for bleeding. Regarding bleeding events and graft failure, the HAS-BLED risk model demonstrated good calibration (bleeding and graft failure: HLT: chi-square: 4.572, p = 0.802, versus chi-square: 6.52, p = 0.18, respectively) and moderate predictive performance (bleeding AUC: 0.72 (0.63–0.79); graft failure: AUC: 0.7 (0.6–0.78)). Conclusions: In our current study, we could demonstrate the HAS-BLED risk score as a helpful tool with acceptable predictive accuracy regarding bleeding events and graft failure following KT. The intensified monitoring and precise stratification/assessment of bleeding risk factors may be helpful in identifying patients at higher risks of bleeding, improved individualized anticoagulation decisions and choices of antithrombotic therapy in order to optimize outcome after kidney transplantation.

Long-term Risk of Bleeding and Ischemic Events After Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack in Young Adults.

Guidelines recommend antithrombotic medication as secondary prevention for patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) at young age based on results from trials in older patients. We investigated the long-term risk of bleeding and ischemic events in young patients after ischemic stroke or TIA. We included 30-day survivors of first-ever ischemic stroke or TIA aged 18-50 years from the Follow-Up of TIA and Stroke Patients and Unelucidated Risk Factor Evaluation (FUTURE) study, a prospective cohort study of stroke at young age. We obtained information on recurrent ischemia based on structured data collection from 1995 until 2014 as part of the FUTURE study follow-up, complemented with information on any bleeding and ischemic events by retrospective chart review from baseline until last medical consultation or June 2020. Primary outcome was any bleeding; secondary outcome any ischemic event during follow-up. Both were stratified for sex, age, etiology, and use of antithrombotic medication at discharge. Bleeding and ischemic events were classified according to location and bleeding events also by severity. We included 544 patients (56.1% women, median age of 42.2; interquartile range [IQR] 36.5-46.7 years) with a median follow-up of 9.6 (IQR 2.5-14.3) years. Ten-year cumulative risk of any bleeding event was 21.8% (95% CI 17.4-26.0) and 33.9% (95% CI 28.3-37.5) of any ischemic event. Risk of bleeding was higher in women with a cumulative risk of 28.2% (95% CI 21.6-34.3) vs 13.7% (95% CI 8.2-18.9) in men (p < 0.01), mainly because of gynecologic bleeds. Female sex (p < 0.001) and age between 40 and 49 years (p = 0.04) were independent predictors of bleeding. Young patients after ischemic stroke or TIA have a substantial long-term risk of both bleeding (especially women) and ischemic events. Future studies should investigate the effects of long-term antithrombotics in young patients, taking into account the risk of bleeding complications.

An antiplatelet response gene expression signature is associated with bleeding.

Gene expression biosignatures may hold promise to individualize antiplatelet therapy in conjunction with current guidelines and risk scores. The Aspirin Response Signature (ARS) score is comprised of a weighted sum of correlated, pro-thrombotic gene transcripts measured in whole blood. In prior work where volunteers were exposed to aspirin 325 mg daily, higher ARS score was associated with lower platelet function; separately, in a clinical cohort of patients, higher ARS scores were associated with increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. To better understand this apparent paradox, we measured ARS gene expression and score in volunteers to determine aspirin dose-response and ticagrelor relationships with ARS score and separately in patients to assess whether ARS is associated with incident bleeding. Blood samples were collected from volunteers (N = 188) who were exposed to 4 weeks of daily aspirin 81 mg, daily aspirin 325 mg, and/or twice-daily ticagrelor 90 mg. ARS scores were calculated from whole blood RNA qPCR, and platelet function and protein expression were assessed in platelet-rich plasma. In mixed linear regression models, aspirin 81 mg exposure was not associated with changes in ARS gene expression or score. Aspirin 325 mg exposure resulted in a 6.0% increase in ARS gene expression (P = 7.5 × 10-9 vs. baseline, P = 2.1 × 10-4 vs. aspirin 81 mg) and an increase in expression of platelet proteins corresponding to ARS genes. Ticagrelor exposure resulted in a 30.7% increase in ARS gene expression (P < 1 × 10-10 vs. baseline and each aspirin dose) and ARS score (P = 7.0 × 10-7 vs. baseline, P = 3.6 × 10-6 and 5.59 × 10-4 vs. aspirin 81 and 325 mg, respectively). Increases in ARS gene expression or score were associated with the magnitude of platelet inhibition across agents. To assess the association between ARS scores and incident bleeding, ARS scores were calculated in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization (N = 1421), of whom 25.4% experienced bleeding events over a median 6.2 years of follow-up. In a Cox model adjusting for demographics and baseline antithrombotic medication use, patients with ARS scores above the median had a higher risk of incident bleeding [hazard ratio 1.26 (95% CI 1.01-1.56), P = 0.038]. The ARS is an Antiplatelet Response Signature that increases in response to greater platelet inhibition due to antiplatelet therapy and may represent a homeostatic mechanism to prevent bleeding. ARS scores could inform future strategies to prevent bleeding while maintaining antiplatelet therapy's benefit of ischaemic cardiovascular event protection.