Antiretroviral Resistance Testing Research Articles

Immunological and molecular assessment of HIV-1 mutations for antiretroviral drug resistance in Saudi Arabia.

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is a significant threat to public health. HIV genotyping and antiretroviral resistance testing may have contributed to improved non-treated management. Immune markers might assist HIV-1 diagnosis and drug-resistant variant identification. HIV-1 immunogenicity and molecular characteristics of antiretroviral drug resistance are evaluated in 56 treatment-naive HIV patients. DNA sequencing and retroviral resistance testing identified HIV-1 genotypes. 55.4% of patients were susceptible to protease inhibitors (PI), nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) antiretroviral drugs, whereas 44.6% had drug-resistance mutations against at least one antiretroviral drug. 3.6% of cases had PI-resistant mutations, while 30.4% had NRTI-resistant mutations, and 30.4% had NNRTI-resistant mutations. In patients who are susceptible to PI, the mean value of human plasma sCD80 is 2.11 ± 0.65 ng/mL; in patients with mutations, it is 3.93 ± 2.91 ng/mL. Individuals who are susceptible to PI have plasma sCD27 levels of 78.7 ± 63.2 U/mL, whereas individuals who are mutant have levels of 56.5 ± 32.1 U/mL. IP-10's mean value was 363 ± 109.2 pg/mL for the susceptible patients and 429 ± 20.7 pg/mL for the mutated patients. In susceptible patients, the plasma sCD4 level is 0.163 ± 0.229 ng/mL; in mutant patients, it is 0.084 ± 0.012 ng/mL. The data showed a relative relation between immunological parameters such as sCD80, sCD27, sCD4, and IP-10 and mutation for drug resistance.

Evolution of HIV-1 Surveillance Drug Resistance Mutations Over 10 Years in New South Wales, Australia.

New South Wales has the greatest burden of HIV in Australia, with 2012 and 2013 recording the highest rates of new diagnoses in 20 years. Concurrently, there has been significant changes in antiretroviral treatments and testing paradigms. We compiled a statewide resistance database to characterize changes in HIV-1 resistance mutations over time. Genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing (GART) was performed on request at three reference laboratories using commercial and in-house methods. In total, 7629 HIV-1 polymerase sequences obtained from GART from 2004 to 2013 were retrospectively collated, reformatted, de-identified, and analyzed using Stanford HIVdb program 7.0 and the 2009 World Health Organization (WHO) surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRMs). Analyses were performed on subgroups of known treatment naives, treatment experienced, and seroconverters. There has been a decrease in overall rates of prevalent drug resistance mutations from 57.8% in 2004 to 21% in 2013. Dual and triple class resistance mutations have decreased from 32.7% in 2004 to 5.8% in 2013 and 16.4% to 1.2%, respectively. In treatment-naive individuals (n = 450), the frequency of protease inhibitor (PI) mutations remains low at 2.7%. In seroconverters, rates of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) are 6.6%, 3%, 3%, and 1.5% for overall, PI, non-nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor (NNRTI), and NRTI, respectively. In treatment experienced, rates remain stable with 36.0%, 18.9%, 29.1%, and 6.4% for overall, NNRTI, NRTI, and PI mutations. The most common mutations in treatment experienced occurred at position M184, T215 (NRTI); K103 (NNRTI); I54 (PI). Apparent decreases in prevalent SDRMs can be attributed to changes in GART testing indications over time. In treatment-naive and -experienced subgroups, rates have been stable with low rates of TDR in seroconverters.

Food insecurity, drug resistance and non-disclosure are associated with virologic non-suppression among HIV pregnant women on antiretroviral treatment.

We determined social and behavioral factors associated with virologic non-suppression among pregnant women receiving Option B+ antiretroviral treatment (ART). Baseline data was used from women in Mobile WAChX trial from 6 public maternal child health (MCH) clinics in Kenya. Virologic non-suppression was defined as HIV viral load (VL) ≥1000 copies/ml. Antiretroviral resistance testing was performed using oligonucleotide ligation (OLA) assay. ART adherence information, motivation and behavioral skills were assessed using Lifewindows IMB tool, depression using PHQ-9, and food insecurity with the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale. Correlates of virologic non-suppression were assessed using Poisson regression. Among 470 pregnant women on ART ≥4 months, 57 (12.1%) had virologic non-suppression, of whom 65% had HIV drug resistance mutations. In univariate analyses, risk of virologic non-suppression was associated with moderate-to-severe food insecurity (RR 1.80 [95% CI 1.06–3.05]), and varied significantly by clinic site (range 2%-22%, p <0.001). In contrast, disclosure (RR 0.36 [95% CI 0.17–0.78]) and having higher adherence skills (RR 0.70 [95% CI 0.58–0.85]) were associated with lower risk of virologic non-suppression. In multivariate analysis adjusting for clinic site, disclosure, depression symptoms, adherence behavior skills and food insecurity, disclosure and food insecurity remained associated with virologic non-suppression. Age, side-effects, social support, physical or emotional abuse, and distance were not associated with virologic non-suppression. Prevalence of virologic non-suppression among pregnant women on ART was appreciable and associated with food insecurity, disclosure and frequent drug resistance. HIV VL and resistance monitoring, and tailored counseling addressing food security and disclosure, may improve virologic suppression in pregnancy.

Low Frequency of Integrase Inhibitor Resistance Mutations Among Therapy-Naïve HIV Patients in Southeast China.

BackgroundWith the widespread use of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) in the clinical setting, transmission of INSTIs-resistance mutations may increase. Data regarding transmitted drug resistance mutations (TDRM) to INSTIs in Chinese HIV patients are limited. The aim of this study was to summarize the INSTIs TDRM, including the frequency of protease inhibitors (PIs) and reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors (RTIs) mutations in treatment-naïve patients in Southeast China.MethodsHIV-1 positive patients were retrospectively selected between April 2018 and October 2020 from the Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, the largest designated HIV/AIDS care hospital in Southeast China. Individuals who were antiretroviral therapy-naïve and received antiretroviral drug resistance testing at baseline were included. Clinical data including demographic data, CD4 counts, HIV-RNA loads, and drug resistance mutations were collected.ResultsA total of 147 patients were enrolled. INSTIs TDRM was rare, with only one primary integrase mutation E138K observed in one sample and one secondary mutation E157Q detected in another sample. The overall prevalence of INSTIs TDRM was 1.36%. A substantial proportion of patients harbored common INSTIs-associated polymorphic variants. Two samples harbored the T215S, M184V and K70E mutations related to nucleoside RTIs (NRTIs). Twelve patients carried nonnucleoside RTIs (NNRTIs)-resistance mutations. Two individuals harbored PIs-resistance mutations: Q58E in one patient and M46I, I54V, V82A, L10F, and Q58E mutations in another patient. The total TDRM rate for RTIs and PIs was 10.20% (15/147), but only 0.68% (1/147) was according to the WHO recommendations on TDRM.ConclusionThe rate of INSTIs TDRM was low among therapy-naïve HIV patients in Southeast China. INSTIs as a first-line regimen are suitable for untreated HIV-1 patients in Southeast China. But special attention must be still paid to INSTIs TDRM in clinical practice.

Genotyping and antiretroviral drug resistance of human immunodeficiency Virus-1 in Jazan, Saudi Arabia.

Determination of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) genotypes and identification of antiretroviral drug-resistant mutations. Among treatment naïve HIV patients in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. HIV is a major public health problem. HIV genotyping and antiretroviral resistance testing is an important guide for better management of treatment-naive. Antiretroviral resistance testing before starting of treatment regimen leads to a better virological response. A total of 57 samples of treatment-naive patients were collected from King Fahd Central Hospital in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Samples were tested for HIV-1 antibodies, western blot, viral load, HIV-1 genotypes through direct sequencing, and antiretroviral resistance testing. The HIV-1 Genotypes were as follow; C: 66.6%, D: 10.5%, G: 8.8%, B: 7.0%, CRF01_AE: 3.5%, A and CRF02_AG: 1.8% each. 77.2% of cases showed susceptibility to the 3 major classes of antiretroviral drugs; Protease inhibitor (PI), Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI); while 8.8% had mutations conferring resistance to NRTI. Mutations conferring resistance to PI were detected in 7.0% of cases, and 1.8% of cases had mutations conferring resistance to both NRTI and PI. Mutations conferring resistance to NNRTI were detected in 5.3% of cases. Mutations associated with antiretroviral drugs include (V82A+I84IV), (L10F+Q58E), (L10F+V82Y), L10FV, L33LF, L89LMV, M184V, E138A, V106I, and V179VD. The prevalence of HIV-1 antiretroviral resistance mutations is 22.8% in the studied population, which may warrant antiretroviral drug resistance testing as a pretreatment to help and guide physicians for the proper HIV treatment.

Identification, Management, and Outcomes of Combination Antiretroviral Treatment Failure in Adolescents With Perinatal Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Asia.

Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) failure is a major threat to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) programs, with implications for individual- and population-level outcomes. Adolescents with perinatally acquired HIV infection (PHIVA) should be a focus for treatment failure given their poorer outcomes compared to children and adults. Data (2014-2018) from a regional cohort of Asian PHIVA who received at least 6 months of continuous cART were analyzed. Treatment failure was defined according to World Health Organization criteria. Descriptive analyses were used to report treatment failure and subsequent management and evaluate postfailure CD4 count and viral load trends. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to compare the cumulative incidence of death and loss to follow-up (LTFU) by treatment failure status. A total 3196 PHIVA were included in the analysis with a median follow-up period of 3.0 years, of whom 230 (7.2%) had experienced 292 treatment failure events (161 virologic, 128 immunologic, 11 clinical) at a rate of 3.78 per 100 person-years. Of the 292 treatment failure events, 31 (10.6%) had a subsequent cART switch within 6 months, which resulted in better immunologic and virologic outcomes compared to those who did not switch cART. The 5-year cumulative incidence of death and LTFU following treatment failure was 18.5% compared to 10.1% without treatment failure. Improved implementation of virologic monitoring is required to realize the benefits of virologic determination of cART failure. There is a need to address issues related to accessibility to subsequent cART regimens, poor adherence limiting scope to switch regimens, and the role of antiretroviral resistance testing.

Comparative analyses of published cost effectiveness models highlight critical considerations which are useful to inform development of new models

Background: Comparative analyses of published cost effectiveness models provide useful insights into critical issues to inform the development of new cost effectiveness models in the same disease area.Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe a comparative analysis of cost-effectiveness models and highlight the importance of such work in informing development of new models. This research uses genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing after first line treatment failure for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) as an example.Method: A literature search was performed, and published cost effectiveness models were selected according to predetermined eligibility criteria. A comprehensive comparative analysis was undertaken for all aspects of the models.Results: Five published models were compared, and several critical issues were identified for consideration when developing a new model. These include the comparator, time horizon and scope of the model. In addition, the composite effect of drug resistance prevalence, antiretroviral therapy efficacy, test performance and the proportion of patients switching to second-line ART potentially have a measurable effect on model results. When considering CD4 count and viral load, dichotomizing patients according to higher cost and lower quality of life (AIDS) versus lower cost and higher quality of life (non-AIDS) status will potentially capture differences between resistance testing and other strategies, which could be confirmed by cross-validation/convergent validation. A quality adjusted life year is an essential outcome which should be explicitly explored in probabilistic sensitivity analysis, where possible.Conclusions: Using an example of GART for HIV, this study demonstrates comparative analysis of previously published cost effectiveness models yields critical information which can be used to inform the structure and specifications of new models.

2505. Incidence of Transmitted Drug Resistance and Its Clinical Implications Between 1999 and 2018 in a Regional HIV Population

BackgroundBaseline genotype antiretroviral resistance testing (GART) were introduced to allow better selection of antiretroviral therapy (ART), minimizing the use of less effective drugs and risk for ongoing transmission of drug-resistant virus. However, the value of baseline GART has recently been questioned due to declining incidence of TDR in the setting of improved drug tolerability profiles and effectiveness. We aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical and economic impact of TDR using a well characterized, geographically defined cohort between 1999–2018.MethodsIn the Southern Alberta Cohort (SAC) database we identified all (ART naïve) HIV patients, ≥16 years of age, with a baseline GART. They were classified by presence or absence of TDR. Clinical and sociodemographic data were obtained from database and chart review. All statistical analysis was performed with Stata.ResultsDuring the study 745 GART tests were done on ART naïve patients. Baseline ART resistance was documented in 78 /745 patients. TDR was to the NNRTI class in 59 (75.6%), to NRTI in 12 (15.4%) and to the PI class in 7 (8.9%) patients. Two patients had two class resistance and none had INSTI resistance. There was a significant difference in cost per year of therapy comparing the TDR and control ($17,152/year vs. $15,362/year, P ≤ 0.001). Patients with TDR had greater pill burden with 20% being on BID/TID ART regimens compared with the controls of 13% (P = 0.003). No differences in incident ART adverse events (12.8% TDR vs. 13.3% no TDR), drug interactions (1.6% vs. 1.0%) or reasons to stop or change ARVs were seen between study groups. The duration of ART on any given drug class was similar between the two populations (P = 0.6694) as was status of viral suppression at one year 73% vs. 65%.ConclusionPresence of TDR at baseline had little immediate impact on ART initiation or tolerance, but by limiting choices negatively impacted pill burden and dosing as well as drug costs. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Neurocognitive Impairment in the Combined Antiretroviral Therapy Era in a Romanian Cohort of Young Adults with Chronic HIV Infection.

HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) continue to be reported even in patients with successful antiretroviral treatment. We investigated the prevalence of neurocognitive impairment and possible HIV-associated determinants of cognition in a Romanian cohort of young adults, parenterally infected with HIV during their first years of life. Two hundred fourteen treatment-experienced HIV-positive individuals [median age: 24 years, males: 48%, median duration on combined antiretroviral therapy (cART): 12 years] underwent standard immunologic and virological monitoring and antiretroviral resistance testing using pol gene sequencing in both plasma and, when available, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) paired samples. Neurocognitive impairment was assessed using a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery, and a global deficit score (GDS) was calculated (cutoff ≥0.5). Cognitive impairment was detected in 35% of the study participants, without any association with sex, median age, CD4 cell count (actual or nadir), CSF and plasma viral load (actual or zenith), AIDS diagnosis, duration of HIV infection, and cART characteristics. Participants carrying resistant viruses tended to be more frequently cognitively impaired (p = 0.36), with a higher median GDS value (p = 0.06) compared with participants harboring wild-type HIV, although the figures did not reach statistical significance. No signs of virological compartmentalization were observed based on CSF versus plasma viral load and on the profile of pol sequences. A moderate rate of mild neurocognitive impairment is still present in young adults with chronic HIV infection acquired in early childhood despite successful cART, without any association with classic markers of HIV infection. New biomarkers reflecting persistent central nervous system inflammation and neuronal injury may be more relevant for the development of HAND.

Prospective Evaluation of the Vela Diagnostics Next-Generation Sequencing Platform for HIV-1 Genotypic Resistance Testing

Genotypic antiretroviral drug resistance testing is a critical component of the global efforts to control the HIV-1 epidemic. This study investigates the semiautomated, next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based Vela Diagnostics Sentosa SQ HIV-1 Genotyping Assay in a prospective cohort of HIV-1-infected patients. Two-hundred sixty-nine samples were successfully sequenced by both NGS and Sanger sequencing. Among the 261 protease/reverse transcriptase (PR/RT) sequences, a mean of 0.37 drug resistance mutations were identified by both Sanger and NGS, 0.08 by NGS alone, and 0.03 by Sanger alone. Among the 50 integrase sequences, a mean of 0.3 drug resistance mutations were detected by both Sanger and NGS, and 0.08 by NGS alone. NGS estimated higher levels of drug resistance to one or more antiretroviral drugs for 6.5% of PR/RT sequences and 4.0% of integrase sequences, whereas Sanger estimated higher levels of drug resistance for 3.8% of PR/RT sequences. Although the samples successfully sequenced by the Sentosa SQ HIV Genotyping Assay demonstrated similar predicted resistance compared with Sanger, 44% of Sentosa runs failed quality control requiring 17 additional runs. This semi-automated NGS-based assay may aid in HIV-1 genotypic drug resistance testing, though numerous quality control issues were observed when this platform was used in a clinical laboratory setting. With additional refinement, the Sentosa SQ HIV-1 Genotyping Assay may contribute to the global efforts to control HIV-1.

What are the effects of antiretroviral resistance testing for people with HIV?

What are the effects of antiretroviral resistance testing for people with HIV?

A Clinical Prediction Rule for Protease Inhibitor Resistance in Patients Failing Second-Line Antiretroviral Therapy.

Background:Most adults with virological failure on second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited settings have no major protease inhibitor (PI) resistance mutations. Therefore, empiric switches to third-line ART would waste resources. Genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing (GART) is expensive and has limited availability. A clinical prediction rule (CPR) for PI resistance could rationalize access to GART.Setting:A private sector ART cohort, South Africa.Methods:We identified adults with virologic failure on ritonavirboosted lopinavir/atazanavir-based ART and GART. We constructed a multivariate logistic regression model including age, sex, PI duration, short-term adherence (using pharmacy claims), concomitant CYP3A4-inducing drugs, and viral load at time of GART. We selected variables for the CPR using a stepwise approach and internally validated the model by bootstrapping.Results:148/339 (44%) patients had PI resistance (defined as ≥ 1 major resistance mutation to current PI). The median age was 42 years (interquartile range 36–48), 212 (63%) were females, 308 (91%) were on lopinavir/ritonavir, and median PI duration was 2.6 years (interquartile range 1.6–4.7). Variables associated with PI resistance and included in the CPR were age {adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.96 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42 to 2.70) for 10-year increase}, PI duration (aOR 1.14 [95% CI: 1.03 to 1.26] per year), and adherence (aOR 1.22 [95% CI: 1.12 to 1.33] per 10% increase). The CPR model had a c-statistic of 0.738 (95% CI: 0.686 to 0.791).Conclusions:Older patients with high adherence and prolonged PI exposure are most likely to benefit from GART to guide selection of a third-line ART regimen. Our CPR to select patients for GART requires external validation before implementation.

Antiretroviral resistance testing in HIV-positive people.

BackgroundResistance to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) compromises treatment effectiveness, often leading to virological failure and mortality. Antiretroviral drug resistance tests may be used at the time of initiation of therapy, or when treatment failure occurs, to inform the choice of ART regimen. Resistance tests (genotypic or phenotypic) are widely used in high‐income countries, but not in resource‐limited settings. This systematic review summarizes the relative merits of resistance testing in treatment‐naive and treatment‐exposed people living with HIV.ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of antiretroviral resistance testing (genotypic or phenotypic) in reducing mortality and morbidity in HIV‐positive people.Search methodsWe attempted to identify all relevant studies, regardless of language or publication status, through searches of electronic databases and conference proceedings up to 26 January 2018. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in the Cochrane Library, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and ClinicalTrials.gov to 26 January 2018. We searched Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) and the Web of Science for publications from 1996 to 26 January 2018.Selection criteriaWe included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared resistance testing to no resistance testing in people with HIV irrespective of their exposure to ART.Primary outcomes of interest were mortality and virological failure. Secondary outcomes were change in mean CD4‐T‐lymphocyte count, clinical progression to AIDS, development of a second or new opportunistic infection, change in viral load, and quality of life.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors independently assessed each reference for prespecified inclusion criteria. Two review authors then independently extracted data from each included study using a standardized data extraction form. We analysed data on an intention‐to‐treat basis using a random‐effects model. We performed subgroup analyses for the type of resistance test used (phenotypic or genotypic), use of expert advice to interpret resistance tests, and age (children and adolescents versus adults). We followed standard Cochrane methodological procedures.Main resultsEleven RCTs (published between 1999 and 2006), which included 2531 participants, met our inclusion criteria. All of these trials exclusively enrolled patients who had previous exposure to ART. We found no observational studies. Length of follow‐up time, study settings, and types of resistance testing varied greatly. Follow‐up ranged from 12 to 150 weeks. All studies were conducted in Europe, USA, or South America. Seven studies used genotypic testing, two used phenotypic testing, and two used both phenotypic and genotypic testing. Only one study was funded by a manufacturer of resistance tests.Resistance testing made little or no difference in mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36 to 2.22; 5 trials, 1140 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence), and may have slightly reduced the number of people with virological failure (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.87; 10 trials, 1728 participants; low‐certainty evidence); and probably made little or no difference in change in CD4 cell count (mean difference (MD) ‐1.00 cells/mm³, 95% CI ‐12.49 to 10.50; 7 trials, 1349 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence) or progression to AIDS (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.29; 3 trials, 809 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence). Resistance testing made little or no difference in adverse events (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.55; 4 trials, 808 participants; low‐certainty evidence) and probably reduced viral load (MD ‐0.23, 95% CI ‐0.35 to ‐0.11; 10 trials, 1837 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence). No studies reported on development of new opportunistic infections or quality of life. We found no statistically significant heterogeneity for any outcomes, and the I² statistic value ranged from 0 to 25%. We found no subgroup effects for types of resistance testing (genotypic versus phenotypic), the addition of expert advice to interpretation of resistance tests, or age. Results for mortality were consistent when we compared studies at high or unclear risk of bias versus studies at low risk of bias.Authors' conclusionsResistance testing probably improved virological outcomes in people who have had virological failure in trials conducted 12 or more years ago. We found no evidence in treatment‐naive people. Resistance testing did not demonstrate important patient benefits in terms of risk of death or progression to AIDS. The trials included very few participants from low‐ and middle‐income countries.11 April 2019Up to dateAll studies incorporated from most recent searchAll eligible published studies found in the last search (26 Jan, 2018) were included

Alternative Sample Types for HIV-1 Antiretroviral Drug Resistance Testing.

Monitoring human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drug resistance is critical for assessing ART effectiveness and treatment outcomes for HIV-1-infected individuals, including children, worldwide. Traditionally, testing for HIV-1 drug resistance has primarily been performed on plasma samples, and with commercially available, clinically validated assays that are costly and difficult to access. While plasma is the preferred sample for HIV-1 drug resistance genotyping, plasma analysis requires sophisticated laboratory equipment, personnel, space, and stringent storage conditions for maintenance of sample integrity and transport. With the limitations in feasibility and affordability of providing these ideal conditions for plasma genotyping in resource-constrained settings, the field has gained substantial experience with the dried blood spot (DBS) technique as an alternative. Moreover, DBS analysis can be used to comprehensively monitor the spread of the epidemic with applications to more-sensitive and quantitative technologies to assess HIV-1 globally.

HIV Antiretroviral Resistance and Transmission in Mother–Infant Pairs Enrolled in a Large Perinatal Study

BackgroundDetection of antiretroviral (ARV) resistance in HIV-infected individuals is not uncommon and may be particularly problematic in HIV-infected pregnant women as it can lead to infant infection with resistant strains. To better evaluate the effect of drug resistance mutations (DRMs) on HIV mother-to-child transmission (MTCT), we determined the prevalence of DRMs in a subset of mother–infant pairs enrolled in a multi-center trial of infant prophylaxis among women not receiving ARVs during the current pregnancy.MethodsA case–control design of 1:4 (1 transmitter to 4 nontransmitters) was utilized to evaluate ARV resistance as a predictor of HIV MTCT in specimens obtained from mother–infant pairs. Secondary objectives included identification of potential risk factors associated with the presence of DRMs. Viroseq HIV-1 Genotyping System was performed on mother–infant specimens to assess for mutations that might result in a substantial reduction in drug susceptibility and clinical outcome, as determined by the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database.ResultsOne hundred and forty infants were infected. Of these, 123 HIV infected mother–infant pairs and 483 of 560 women who did not transmit HIV had amplifiable HIV nucleic acid enabling ARV resistance testing. A wide variety of DRMs were detected (Figure 1). Sixty (10%) of 606 women had clinically relevant DRMs; 12 (2%) had DRMs against more than 1 ARV class. Among 123 HIV− infected infants, 13 (11%) had clinically relevant DRMs with 3 (2%) harboring DRMs against more than 1 ARV class. Of 13 infants with DRMs, 10 (77%) were infected in utero. In univariate and multivariate analyses, DRMs in mothers were not associated with increased risk of HIV MTCT (AOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.38–1.5). Log HIV viral load was the only predictor of MTCT (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2−1.6). The presence of DRMs in mothers who transmitted was strongly associated with the presence of DRMs in infants (P < 0.001).ConclusionIn infected pregnant women without ARV exposure during their current gestation, the presence of pre-existing DRMs with a wide diversity was noted. DRMs do not increase the risk of HIV MTCT. However, if women with DRMs are not virologically suppressed they are likely to transmit resistant mutations even without selective ARV pressure, thus complicating treatment options.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Antiretroviral resistance testing in people living with HIV

Antiretroviral resistance testing in people living with HIV

HIV-1 antiretroviral drug resistance patterns in patients failing NNRTI-based treatment: results from a national survey in South Africa.

Routine HIV-1 antiretroviral drug resistance testing for patients failing NNRTI-based regimens is not recommended in resource-limited settings. Therefore, surveys are required to monitor resistance profiles in patients failing ART. A cross-sectional survey was conducted amongst patients failing NNRTI-based regimens in the public sector throughout South Africa. Virological failure was defined as two consecutive HIV-1 viral load results >1000 RNA copies/mL. Pol sequences were obtained using RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing and submitted to Stanford HIVdb v7.0.1. A total of 788 sequences were available for analysis. Most patients failed a tenofovir-based NRTI backbone (74.4%) in combination with efavirenz (82.1%) after median treatment duration of 36 months. K103N (48.9%) and V106M (34.9%) were the most common NNRTI mutations. Only one-third of patients retained full susceptibility to second-generation NNRTIs such as etravirine (36.5%) and rilpivirine (27.3%). After M184V/I (82.7%), K65R was the most common NRTI mutation (45.8%). The prevalence of K65R increased to 57.5% in patients failing a tenofovir regimen without prior stavudine exposure. Cross-resistance to NRTIs was often observed, but did not seem to affect the predicted activity of zidovudine as 82.9% of patients remained fully susceptible to this drug. The introduction of tenofovir-based first-line regimens has dramatically increased the prevalence of K65R mutations in the HIV-1-infected South African population. However, most patients failing tenofovir-based regimens remained fully susceptible to zidovudine. Based on these data, there is currently no need to change either the recommended first- or second-line ART regimens in South Africa.

Random lopinavir concentrations predict resistance on lopinavir-based antiretroviral therapy

Considering that most patients who experience virological failure (VF) on lopinavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) fail due to poor adherence rather than resistance, an objective adherence measure could limit costs by rationalising the use of genotype antiretroviral resistance testing (GART) in countries with access to third-line ART. A cross-sectional study was conducted in a resource-limited setting at two large clinics in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa, in patients experiencing VF (HIV-RNA > 1000 copies/mL) on lopinavir-based ART who had undergone GART. Associations between major protease inhibitor (PI) resistance mutations and random plasma lopinavir concentrations were explored. A total of 134 patients, including 31 children, were included in the analysis. The prevalence of patients with major PI resistance mutations was 20.9% (n = 28). A random lopinavir concentration above the recommended minimum trough of 1 µg/mL [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 5.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.04–16.50; P = 0.001] and male sex (aOR = 3.19, 95% CI 1.22–8.33; P = 0.018) were predictive of the presence of at least one major PI resistance mutation. Random lopinavir concentrations of <1 µg/mL had a negative predictive value of 91% for major PI resistance mutations. Random lopinavir concentrations are strongly associated with the presence of major PI resistance mutations. Access to costly GART in patients experiencing VF on second-line ART could be restricted to patients with lopinavir concentrations above the recommended minimum trough of 1 µg/mL or, in areas where GART is unavailable, could be used as a criterion to empirically switch to third-line ART.

Reporting on the prevalence of antiretroviral drug resistance in a regional HIV population over 20 years: a word of caution.

Failure to achieve complete viral suppression with antiretroviral drugs (ARV) may lead to uncontrolled HIV replication, ARV resistance and negative outcomes. Monitoring and reporting of HIV resistance trends is important but problematic. We examined prevalent resistance rates in an HIV population over 20 years and document how rates may appear to vary greatly based solely on which parameters are utilized. We determined the annual use of genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing (GART) from 1995 to 2014 for all patients receiving HIV care in southern Alberta, Canada, and the presence of resistance mutations in those tested. The impact on prevalent resistance rates of using cumulative or latest GART was also determined. Between 1995 and 2014, the number of patients with GART increased from <1% to 71%. Prevalent resistance in patients with GART decreased from a high of 52% in 2003 to 25.8% in 2014. However, if prevalence rates were reported using all active patients as denominator, including those without GART, prevalence increased from 0.7% to 18.5%. Prevalence rates were 7% to 9% higher in any given year if cumulative GART rather than latest GART results were used. While prevalence resistance rates are decreasing, the precise rates being reported may vary due to increasing number of patients tested annually, using either the entire population as denominator or only patients with GART, and using either last or cumulative GART. Defining these parameters is critical if prevalence is to be compared over time or between HIV populations.

Maintaining the continuity of HIV-care records for patients transferring care between centers: challenges, workloads, needs and risks

ABSTRACTWith improved life expectancy, the medical records of HIV-infected patients are likely to be transferred repeatedly between HIV caregivers. The challenges, and risk for introducing medical error from incomplete record transfers are poorly understood. We measured number of requests for record transfer, the workload incurred, and explore, using genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing results (GART), the potential risk of incomplete records. Using retrospective database and chart review, we examined all patients followed at the Southern Alberta Clinic between 1 January 2004 and 1 January 2015, and determined how many patients transferred care into and out our program, the associated requests and the workload for record transfer. Using a complete record of all GART tests, the potential importance of absent historic records in current treatment decisions was analyzed. The annual churn rate was 22 ± 3.4%. We received requests for only 70% of patient records who had left our care. Median time for receipt of incoming medical records was 28 days; average clerical time for processing data was 2 hours/record. Of all GART results, 25% exhibited resistance. Of 111 patients with potentially misleading GART results (i.e., documented historical resistance not visible on more recent GART), 34 (30.6%) had moved in from elsewhere. Rigorous maintenance of the continuity of the HIV record is not universally practiced. Resources, costs and logistic challenges as well as a lack of appreciation of risks clearly shown by GART testing, may be relevant barriers. Addressing such issues is pressing as aging and transfers of care are increasingly common.