Long-acting Injectable Antipsychotics Research Articles

The Real-world Effect of Long-acting Injectable Antipsychotics on Annual Medical Costs of Korean Schizophrenia Patients.

Schizophrenia is a severe and chronic mental disorder that significantly impacts cognitive, social, and occupational functions, leading to substantial economic burdens. Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics have been introduced to improve treatment adherence and outcomes, yet their economic impact remains debated. We aim to analyze the impact of LAIs on the medical costs of Korean schizophrenia patients. A retrospective analysis of 164 schizophrenia patients treated with LAI antipsychotics, paliperidone palmitate, and aripiprazole monohydrate at Korea University Guro Hospital between January 2017 and July 2022 was performed. Comparisons of inpatient department (IPD) and outpatient department (OPD) healthcare expenditures one year before and after LAI initiation were conducted. LAIs led to an increase in annual OPD costs (1,437.44 ± 1,127.60 to 4,015.42 ± 1,204.59; units: 1,000 KRW) but significantly reduced IPD admission associated costs (3,826.06 ± 5,500.63 to 698.06 ± 3,619.38; units: 1,000 KRW). After LAI administration, there was an overall reduction in total annual healthcare costs (5,263.49 ± 5,333.11 to 4,713.48 ± 3,625.89; units: 1,000 KRW), but it was not statistically significant. Although the use of LAIs did not significantly lower the first-year medical costs of schizophrenia patients, they offer beneficial economic impacts over time by reducing hospitalization-associated costs. Future research should focus on long-term cost analyses and the impacts of newer LAI formulations.

Clinical Correlates of Antipsychotic Plasma Levels with Long-Acting Paliperidone: Corrélats cliniques des concentrations plasmiques de palipéridone à libération prolongée.

The majority of patients with schizophrenia experience dramatic improvement in psychotic symptoms when treated with antipsychotic medication. Maintenance treatment can prevent relapses but problems with medication adherence limit effectiveness. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) provide an opportunity to establish adherence but challenges remain in ensuring that the dose selected is therapeutic. Therapeutic drug monitoring has not been established as valuable for LAIs in the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia. This exploratory study was undertaken to describe plasma paliperidone levels in outpatients treated with the LAI paliperidone palmitate and to determine whether paliperidone levels are associated with subjective experience on medication and side effects. Twenty-one outpatients with schizophrenia receiving treatment with LAI paliperidone consented to participation in this study. Blood samples were obtained for measurement of paliperidone and prolactin levels at the first visit. A second paliperidone level was obtained at the time of the next injection for 18 of the participants. Clinical rating scales were administered at the first visit to assess illness severity, attitudes regarding medication, subjective well-being and side effects. Paliperidone levels were highly correlated at the two time points (ρ = .85; P < .001). Mean paliperidone level at the first visit was 34.9 ng/ml and ranged from 5.1 to 73.9 ng/ml. Higher paliperidone levels were correlated with higher prolactin levels (ρ = 0.59, P < .01) and lower sexual desire (ρ = -.58, P < .01). We demonstrated that paliperidone levels can be measured reliably in patients receiving LAI paliperidone. Higher plasma levels were associated with higher prolactin levels and reduced sexual desire but not with measures of subjective experience on medications or other side effects. Measurement of paliperidone levels in patients treated with paliperidone palmitate may have the potential to minimize the dose of medication prescribed and, in turn, the severity of sexual side effects.

Treatment With Long-Acting Injectable Aripiprazole During Pregnancy in Bipolar Disorder: A Scoping Review

Background: The management of bipolar disorder during pregnancy presents a significant challenge, particularly regarding the safety and effectiveness of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics like aripiprazole. Despite the growing use of LAI antipsychotics in psychiatric disorders, data on their use during pregnancy are limited, especially for bipolar disorder. This study aimed to shed light on this issue through a scoping review. Areas of Uncertainty: The level of evidence concerning the safety of second-generation antipsychotics during pregnancy is limited. Data on LAI aripirazole are even more limited. Data Sources: We conducted a scoping review following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, systematically searching multiple electronic databases for studies published between January 2008 and February 2024. The review focused on the administration of aripiprazole during pregnancy among patients with psychiatric disorders, examining outcomes related to maternal health, fetal well-being, and neonatal outcomes. Results: The scoping review identified 11 case reports that met the inclusion criteria and 4 additional studies (prospective and retrospective cohort studies). Conclusions: The scoping review emphasizes the need for further research to confirm its safety and efficacy. The limited data underscore the importance of individualized treatment plans and informed decision-making, considering the unique risks and benefits of LAI antipsychotic use during pregnancy. Further studies are imperative to provide more definitive guidance for managing bipolar disorder with LAI antipsychotics in pregnant patients.

What is the neurobiology of schizophrenia?

Schizophrenia spectrum disorders are brain diseases that are developmental dementias (dementia praecox). Their pathology begins in utero with psychosis most commonly becoming evident in adolescence and early adulthood. It is estimated they afflict the U.S. population at a prevalence rate of approximately 0.8%. Genetic studies indicate that these brain diseases are about 80% determined by genes and about 20% determined by environmental risk factors. Inheritance is polygenic with some 270 gene loci having been identified as contributing to the risk for schizophrenia. Interestingly, many of the identified gene loci and gene polymorphisms are involved in brain formation and maturation. The identified genetic and epigenetic risks give rise to a brain in which neuroblasts migrate abnormally, assume abnormal locations and orientations, and are vulnerable to excessive neuronal and synaptic loss, resulting in overt psychotic illness. The illness trajectory of schizophrenia then is one of loss of brain mass related to the number of active psychotic exacerbations and the duration of untreated illness. In this context, molecules such as dopamine, glutamate, and serotonin play critical roles with respect to positive, negative, and cognitive domains of illness. Acutely, antipsychotics ameliorate active psychotic illness, especially positive signs and symptoms. The long-term effects of antipsychotic medications have been debated; however, the bulk of imaging data suggest that antipsychotics slow but do not reverse the illness trajectory of schizophrenia. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAI) appear superior in this regard. Clozapine remains the "gold standard" in managing treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Clinical, Quality of Life, and Health Care Utilization Outcomes of Switching the Administration Route of Antipsychotic Medications Among People With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Using long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications can improve the outcomes of patients with schizophrenia, such as reducing symptom severity and hospitalization risk. However, the outcomes of switching from oral to LAI antipsychotic medications are unclear. The purpose of this review is to provide a summary of the clinical, quality of life, and health care utilization outcomes of switching from oral to LAI antipsychotics among patients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder. We thoroughly searched the PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases. To conduct the meta-analysis, we used the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Program. Forty-one articles met our inclusion criteria. After switching to LAIs, symptom severity, the number of rehospitalizations, emergency department visits, and overall health care costs were reduced. Also, social functioning significantly improved. However, no differences were observed in the frequency of outpatient visits. Pharmacy costs were increased between pre- and post-LAI initiation. Our findings support evidence that changing the route of administration of antipsychotic medications from oral to long-acting intramuscular injections can improve the clinical, quality of life, and health care utilization outcomes in people with schizophrenia. Health care practitioners might consider encouraging LAI use earlier during treatment for schizophrenia for better clinical outcomes and to reduce health care utilization associated with treatment.

Early use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in bipolar disorder type I: An expert consensus.

Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are not routinely offered to patients living with bipolar disorder type I (BP-I), despite widespread evidence that supports their benefits over oral antipsychotics, particularly in early disease. A round-table meeting of psychiatrists convened to discuss barriers and opportunities and provide consensus recommendations around the early use of LAIs for BP-I. LAIs are rarely prescribed to treat BP-I unless a patient has severe symptoms, sub-optimal adherence to oral antipsychotics, or has experienced multiple relapses. Beyond country-specific accessibility issues (e.g., healthcare infrastructure and availability/approval status), primary barriers to the effective use of LAIs were identified as attitudinal and knowledge/experience-based. Direct discussions between healthcare providers and patients about treatment preferences may not occur due to a preconceived notion that patients prefer oral antipsychotics. Moreover, as LAIs have historically been limited to the treatment of schizophrenia and the most severe cases of BP-I, healthcare providers might be unaware of the benefits LAIs provide in the overall management of BP-I. Improved treatment adherence associated with LAIs compared to oral antipsychotics may support improved outcomes for patients (e.g., reduced relapse and hospitalization). Involvement of all stakeholders (healthcare providers, patients, and their supporters) participating in the patient journey is critical in early and shared decision-making processes. Clinical and database studies could potentially bridge knowledge gaps to facilitate acceptance of LAIs. This review discusses the benefits of LAIs in the management of BP-I and identifies barriers to use, while providing expert consensus recommendations for potential solutions to support informed treatment decision-making.

Multi-level barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based antipsychotics in the treatment of early-phase schizophrenia.

Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications and clozapine are effective yet underutilized medical therapies in early intervention services. The purpose of this study was to conduct a pre-implementation evaluation of contextual determinants of early intervention programs to implement innovations optimizing LAI antipsychotic and clozapine use within a shared decision-making model. Semi-structured interviews explored barriers and facilitators to implementing LAI antipsychotics and clozapine in early intervention services. Participants were: prescribers (n = 2), non-prescribing clinicians (n = 5), administrators (n = 3), clients (n = 3), and caregivers (n = 3). Interviews were structured and analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0). Participants were supportive of using LAI antipsychotics, despite barriers (e.g., transportation, insurance coverage), while most were unfamiliar with clozapine (Innovation). Critical incidents (e.g., COVID-19) did not interfere with implementation, while barriers included lack of performance measures; stigma affecting willingness to take medication; and clozapine considered to be a "last resort" (Outer Setting). Treatment culture was described as client-centered and collaborative, and most participants indicated LAI antipsychotic use was compatible with clinic workflows, but some were in need of resources (e.g., individuals trained to administer LAI antipsychotics; Inner Setting). Participants on the healthcare team expressed confidence in their roles. Family education and collaborative decision-making were recommended to improve client/family engagement (Individuals). Participants related the importance of tracking medication compliance, addressing client concerns, and providing prescribers with updated guidelines on evidence-based treatment (Implementation Process). Results may guide implementation strategy selection for future programs seeking to optimize the use of LAI antipsychotics and clozapine for early-phase schizophrenia, when appropriate.

The Underuse of Clozapine and Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics.

Schizophrenia is among the most devastating and costly human diseases. The public face of the failure to appropriately treat schizophrenia includes approximately 100,000 homeless individuals with schizophrenia and related psychoses and 200,000 incarcerated individuals with similar diagnoses. Clozapine and long-acting injectable antipsychotics are among the most effective treatments, but both are markedly underused. The following organizations should take responsibility for fixing this problem: National Institute of Mental Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, American Psychiatric Association, and patient and family advocacy groups.

Renal Impairment and Dose Adjustment of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics: Are We Getting It Right? A Case Report

Renal Impairment and Dose Adjustment of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics: Are We Getting It Right? A Case Report

Association of antipsychotic formulations with sudden cardiac death in patients with schizophrenia: A nationwide population-based case–control study

The aim of this study was to clarify the association between various antipsychotic formulations—oral-daily antipsychotics (OAPs), long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs), and their combination—and the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). We conducted a nationwide population-based case–control study using data from 2011 to 2020 from the National Health Insurance Research Database and multiple-cause-of-death data from Taiwan. The study included patients with a new diagnosis of schizophrenia who were followed for SCD occurrence until 2020. Cases and controls were frequency-matched at a 1:4 ratio by age, sex, and year of new schizophrenia diagnosis. Compared with the use of OAP monotherapy, the use of LAI and OAP combination (OR = 1.91) and LAI monotherapy (OR = 1.45) were associated with an increased risk of SCD. Additionally, cardiovascular comorbidities (adjusted OR = 11.15) were identified as a significant risk factor for SCD. This study revealed the following hierarchy of SCD risk associated with antipsychotic formulations (listed from lowest to highest risk): nonuse of antipsychotics, OAP monotherapy, LAI monotherapy, and their combination. These findings underscore the importance of assessing cardiovascular disease history before LAIs are prescribed to patients with schizophrenia and indicate that physicians should avoid prescribing combined antipsychotics when using LAIs.

Disability and Adverse Effects of Oral Versus Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia-Spectrum and Bipolar Disorder: A Comparison Based on Data-Driven Taxonomy.

Patients undergoing antipsychotic treatment for psychiatric disorders may experience challenges in functioning, either stemming from the severity of the illness or from the tolerability issues of prescribed medications. The aims of this cross-sectional study are to investigate the impact of adverse effects of antipsychotic drugs on patients' daily life functioning, comparing oral and long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics, and further dividing antipsychotics by receptor-binding profiles based on recently defined data-driven taxonomy. This study involved patients with schizophrenia and bipolar spectrum disorders taking oral or LAI antipsychotics. Disability and functioning levels were assessed using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS), and the adverse effects of medications were evaluated using the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Side Effect Rating Scale and its subscales. The total sample consisted of 126 participants with a diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum or bipolar disorder, and included 54 males and 72 females ranging from 18 to 78 years of age (mean45.1, standard deviation 14); 78 patients were taking oral antipsychotics and 48 were taking LAI antipsychotics, with subcategories of muscarinic (31), adrenergic/low dopamine (25), serotonergic/dopaminergic (23), dopaminergic (1), LAI muscarinic (15), LAI adrenergic (6), and LAI serotonergic/dopaminergic (25). The UKU total score for adverse effects showed significant correlations with WHODAS total score (ρ=0.475; p<0.001). Compared with oral antipsychotics, LAIs showed significantly lower scores in psychological (p=0.014), autonomic (p=0.008), other (p=0.004), and sexual adverse effects (p=0.008), as well as the UKU total score (p=0.002). The Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant difference in adverse effects between LAI and oral muscarinic subgroups, with LAIs having lower scores compared with antipsychotics binding to muscarinic receptors (p=0.043). These findings indicate clinically relevant differences in adverse effects among formulations, warranting further investigation for future observational studies.

Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Initiation in Child and Adolescent Patients with Psychiatric Disorders.

Objectives: There are currently no long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIAs) that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in child and adolescent patients, however these agents are used off-label for the treatment of various psychiatric disorders. This study aims to describe the initiation and maintenance dosing strategies of LAIAs in child and adolescent psychiatry inpatients. Methods: This was a single-site retrospective chart review of patients less than 18 years of age initiated on an LAIA during an acute psychiatric hospitalization between October 1, 2015, and October 31, 2022. Patient demographics and hospital encounter information were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 6402 unique pediatric patients discharged from the acute psychiatric hospital within the specified timeframe, 45 (0.7%) were newly initiated on an LAIA. The average age was 15.6 years (range 10-17), with a greater proportion of male (n = 26, 57.8%) and Black or African American (n = 27, 60%) patients. The LAIA agents prescribed included paliperidone palmitate (n = 21, 46.7%), aripiprazole monohydrate (n = 15, 33.3%), aripiprazole lauroxil (n = 7, 15.6%), haloperidol decanoate (n = 1, 2.2%), and risperidone microspheres (n = 1, 2.2%). Primary diagnosis via International Classification of Diseases-10 code at discharge included schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders (n = 19, 42.2%); bipolar disorder (n = 14, 31.1%); disruptive, impulse control, and conduct disorders (n = 6, 13.3%); autistic disorder (n = 5, 11.1%); and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 1, 2.2%). Seventeen patients (37.8%) received a loading dose regimen and/or a maintenance dose regimen that differed from adult package-insert dosing. The mean length of stay was 23.7 days, and 14 patients (31.1%) were readmitted to the psychiatric hospital within 6 months of discharge. The mean number of days to readmission was 71.9 days. Conclusions: This retrospective study is the first to focus on LAIA initiation and maintenance dosing strategies of multiple agents in both a child and adolescent patient population. Further research is required to evaluate the impact of LAIAs on clinical outcomes in this patient population.

All-cause mortality risk in long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patients with schizophrenia receiving antipsychotic treatment present lower mortality rates than those who do not. However, the non-adherence rate is high, which can be partially addressed using long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics. The impact of LAI treatments on all-cause mortality compared to oral antipsychotics remains unclear. To fill that gap, a random effects meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the odds ratio (OR) of all-cause, suicidal, and non-suicidal mortality among patients taking LAI antipsychotics compared to oral antipsychotics (PROSPERO:CRD42023391352). Individual and pooled LAI antipsychotics were analyzed against pooled oral antipsychotics. Sensitivity analyses were performed for study design, setting, and industry sponsorship. Meta-regressions were conducted for gender, age, antipsychotic dose, and race. Seventeen articles, total sample 12,042 patients (N = 5795 oral, N = 6247 LAI) were included. Lower risk of all-cause mortality for patients receiving LAI antipsychotics vs receiving oral antipsychotics was found (OR = 0.79; 95%CI = 0.66-0.95). Statistical significance was maintained when only studies comparing the same LAI and oral antipsychotic were included (OR = 0.79; 95%CI = 0.66-0.95; p = <0.01), as well as for non-suicidal mortality (OR = 0.77: 95%CI = 0.63-0.94; p = 0.01), but not for suicidal mortality (OR = 0.86; 95%CI = 0.59-1.26; p = 0.44). Mortality reduction was more pronounced for LAI antipsychotics in first-episode psychosis (FEP) (OR = 0.79; 95%CI = 0.66-0.96) compared to chronic psychosis. No individual LAI reported statistically significant differences against all pooled oral antipsychotics. LAI antipsychotics are associated with a lower risk of all-cause and non-suicidal mortality in individuals with schizophrenia compared to oral antipsychotics. Better adherence to the medication and health services may explain this difference. Whenever possible, the use of LAIs should be considered from the FEP.

Efficacy and acceptability of long-acting antipsychotics in acutely ill individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

To assess the effect of Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics in acutely ill patients, we systematically searched major databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LAIs with other LAIs, oral antipsychotics, or placebo in acutely symptomatic adults with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Data were analyzed with a random-effects network meta-analysis. Co-primary outcomes were efficacy (mean change in psychopathology rating scales) and acceptability (all-cause discontinuations) at study endpoint.Of 25 RCTs, 19 studies tested second-generation LAIs (SGA-LAIs) and six first-generation LAIs (FGA-LAIs). Due to a disconnected network, FGA-LAIs were analyzed separately, with poor data quality. The SGA-LAIs network included 8,418 individuals (males=63%, mean age=39.3 years). All SGA-LAIs outperformed placebo in reducing acute symptoms at study endpoint (median follow-up=13 weeks). They were more acceptable than placebo with the only exception of olanzapine, for which no differences with placebo emerged. Additionally, we distinguished between different LAI formulations of the same antipsychotic to explore potential pharmacokinetic differences. Most formulations outperformed placebo in the very short-term (2 weeks or less), regardless of the need for initial oral supplementation.SGA-LAIs are evidence-based treatments in acutely ill individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Findings support the use of SGA-LAIs to manage psychopathology and improve adherence right from the acute phases of illness.

Schizophrenia and Heart Health: Are Antipsychotics a Friend or Foe?

Schizophrenia is one of the most disabling of the psychiatric diseases. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Extended (BRSE) is used to evaluate the severity of psychiatric symptoms. Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics are commonly used and are preferred over oral antipsychotic medications. A two-center-based cross-sectional study was performed on 130 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder based on the International Classification of Diseases 10 criteria. We studied the relation between the development of cardiovascular risk factors and the antipsychotic medication that was administered in these patients. Our study demonstrates strong links between several cardiovascular risk factors and the duration of psychosis; the duration of the LAI antipsychotic treatment; the duration between the onset of the disease and the start of LAI antipsychotic treatment; and the use of specific LAI antipsychotic medications.

Three-Year Outcomes of 6-Month Paliperidone Palmitate in Adults With Schizophrenia

Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics have the potential to improve adherence and symptom control in patients with schizophrenia, promoting long-term recovery. Paliperidone palmitate (PP) once every 6 months is the first and currently only LAI antipsychotic with an extended dosing interval of 6 months. To assess long-term outcomes of PP received once every 6 months in adults with schizophrenia. In a 2-year open-label extension (OLE) study of a 1-year randomized clinical trial (RCT), eligible adults with schizophrenia could choose to continue PP every 6 months if they had not experienced relapse after receiving PP once every 3 or 6 months in the 1-year, international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized noninferiority trial. The present analysis focused on patients receiving PP every 6 months in the double-blind trial through the OLE study (November 20, 2017, to May 3, 2022). Patients received a dorsogluteal injection of PP on day 1 and once every 6 months up to month 30. End points included assessment of relapse and change from the double-blind trial baseline to the OLE end point in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and subscale, Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale, and Personal Social Performance (PSP) Scale scores. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), injection site evaluations, and laboratory tests were also assessed. Among 121 patients (83 [68.6%] male), mean (SD) age at baseline was 38.6 (11.24) years and mean (SD) duration of illness was 11.0 (9.45) years. At screening of the double-blind study, 101 patients (83.5%) were taking an oral antipsychotic and 20 (16.5%) were taking an LAI antipsychotic. Altogether, 5 of 121 patients (4.1%) experienced relapse during the 3-year follow-up; reasons for relapse were psychiatric hospitalization (2 [1.7%]), suicidal or homicidal ideation (2 [1.7%]), and deliberate self-injury (1 [0.8%]). Patients treated with PP every 6 months were clinically and functionally stable, and outcomes were well maintained, evidenced by stable scores on the PANSS (mean [SD] change, -2.6 [9.96] points), CGI-S (mean [SD] change, -0.2 [0.57] points), and PSP (mean [SD] change, 3.1 [9.14] points) scales over the 3-year period. In total, 101 patients (83.5%) completed the 2-year OLE. At least 1 TEAE was reported in 97 of 121 patients (80.2%) overall; no new safety or tolerability concerns were identified. In a 2-year OLE study of a 1-year RCT, results supported favorable long-term outcomes of PP once every 6 months for up to 3 years in adults with schizophrenia.

Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics in the Geriatric Population: A longitudinal Study

ObjectiveThis study compares demographic, clinical characteristics, and outcomes in older adults on long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAI-AP) vs. oral antipsychotics (PO-AP). DesignThis observational study with a retrospective cohort utilized the electronic medical record's search engine to review charts of geriatric patients on LAI-AP for a two-year period. A convenience sample on PO-AP formed the comparison group. LAI-AP patients were subcategorized into discontinuation and continuation groups. SettingConducted at an urban, psychiatric outpatient clinic, using charts from October 2020 to 2022. ParticipantsPatients at least 60 years-old with psychotic or mood disorders on antipsychotics for at least 3-months during the study period. MeasurementsDemographic and clinical variables, including diagnosis, medication type, side effects, medical comorbidities, neurocognitive status, and secondary medications, were collected for both PO-AP and LAI-AP groups. Outcome variables included missed appointments, psychiatric and medical hospitalizations, and emergency room visits. Correlates of discontinuation of LAI-AP were also assessed. ResultsLAI-AP had a higher proportion than PO-AP of primary psychotic disorders (87.8% vs. 64.3%). During the study, PO-AP had higher rates of missed appointments (median 18% vs. 13% for LAI-AP) and psychiatric admissions (mean 0.019/month vs. 0.006/month for LAI-AP;); Female sex was a risk factor for discontinuation of LAI-AP (86.7% of discontinuation group vs. 55.2% of continuation group). ConclusionsThe LAI-AP group showed reduced hospitalizations, better treatment engagement, and comparable tolerability to PO-AP. Preliminary data suggests gender may influence LAI-AP discontinuation rates. This study adds to the sparse literature investigating the efficacy and tolerability of LAI-AP in geriatric patients.

A Comprehensive Guide to Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics for Primary Care Clinicians.

We propose a paper that provides education on commonly used long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) to improve primary care based mental health interventions in patients with severe mental illnesses (SMIs) such as schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorders. With the expanding interface of primary care and psychiatry across all healthcare settings, it has become increasingly important for primary care clinicians to have a broader understanding of common psychiatric treatments, including LAIs. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics have been shown to be helpful in significantly improving treatment adherence, preventing disease progression, improving treatment response, decreasing readmission rates, and reducing social impairment. We discuss evidence-based indications and guidelines for use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics. We provide an overview of the treatment of SMI with LAIs, mainly focusing on the most commonly used long-acting injectable antipsychotics, advantages and disadvantages of each, along with outlining important clinical pearls for ease of practical application. Equipped with increased familiarity and understanding of these essential therapies, primary care clinicians can better facilitate early engagement with psychiatric care, promote more widespread use, and thus significantly improve the wellbeing and quality of life of patients with severe mental illness.

Predictors of Readmission in Young Adults with First-Episode Psychosis: A Multicentric Retrospective Study with a 12-Month Follow-Up.

A significant number of young individuals are readmitted one or more times shortly after their first episode of psychosis. Readmission may represent a marker of psychopathological vulnerability. Our primary aim was to evaluate the impact of clinical and socio-demographic variables on readmission at 12-month follow-up. Secondly, our goal was to determine whether the use of Long-Acting Injection (LAI) antipsychotics provides notable benefits compared to oral medications in preventing subsequent readmissions. 80 patients hospitalised for the first time with a diagnosis of psychotic disorder (ICD-10 criteria) were retrospectively assessed through clinical records. The mean age was 21.7 years. Patients were predominantly male (n = 62, 77.5%), and 55 subjects had at least 8 years of education. 50% of the sample was "NEET" (not in education, employment, or training). 35 patients (43.8%) were discharged with a LAI antipsychotic, while 45 (56.2%) recieved oral antipsychotic therapy. Substance use (p = 0.04) and oral antipsychotics at discharge (p = 0.003) were significantly associated with readmission at 1 year. We did not find any significant predictors of being discharged with LAI therapy. Our findings underlined the importance of identifying patients at risk of readmission in order to prevent future rehospitalization and promote appropriate prevention strategies. LAIs should be considered as a first-choice treatment for patients hospitalised for FEP since they proved to be effective in preventing relapse.

Assessing the impact of long-acting injectable compared to oral antipsychotic medications on readmission to a state psychiatric hospital.

People living with schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) have a higher death rate which is caused, in part, by poorer adherence to treatment as compared to those with other mental illnesses. Using long-acting injectable antipsychotic (LAI) medications can improve medication adherence and reduce hospitalizations for people living with SSD but are often underutilized. As compared to oral antipsychotic medications provided to patients with SSD at discharge from a psychiatric hospitalization, being provided with an LAI antipsychotic medication may reduce subsequent rehospitalization. Specifically, patients discharged on an atypical or second-generation LAI medication are less likely to be readmitted to the hospital when compared to those discharged on a typical first-generation oral medication. Because LAI antipsychotic medications are often underutilized as treatment options, the study findings suggest that this modality may be considered for patients with SSD when being discharged from a psychiatric hospitalization. Ideally, psychiatric-mental health nurses can educate patients about indications, benefits, and risks of using atypical or second-generation LAI antipsychotic medications during hospitalization and at discharge prevent the risk for future rehospitalizations. INTRODUCTION: People living with schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) have poorer medication adherence compared to those with other mental illnesses. Long-acting injectable antipsychotic (LAI) medication use is associated with greater adherence, reduced re-hospitalizations, and improved recovery outcomes when compared to oral formulations. To compare LAI antipsychotic medication use versus oral formulations on readmission to an inpatient hospital. Medical records (N = 707) from a state psychiatric hospital in the southern region of the United States were reviewed. Controlling for demographic variables, logistic regression analyses were used to examine LAI compared to oral formulations on readmission. Compared to patients discharged with oral antipsychotic medications, those with LAIs had a lower proportion of readmission rates in 6-month and 1-year periods, but not 30-day or 2-year periods. When controlling for demographic variables, those discharged with an atypical LAI had significantly lower odds of being readmitted within the 24-year period compared to those discharged on a typical oral antipsychotic. Compared to orals, LAIs do not increase and may mitigate readmissions to psychiatric hospitalization. Psychiatric-mental health nurses and other professionals may recommend LAIs when indicated for those with SSD.