Antiplatelet Group Research Articles

Safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis and deferred revascularization.

This study investigated the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their fractional flow reserve (FFR). A nationwide cohort study was conducted using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. A total of 4657 patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their FFR were identified from 2013 to 2020. FFR was indicated in patients with no prior evidence of myocardial ischemia and intermediate coronary artery stenosis (50%-70%) as determined by quantitative coronary angiography. Patients were classified according to whether antiplatelet therapy was initiated after the index procedure. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, and stroke, during a 5-year follow-up period. The primary safety outcome was any gastrointestinal bleeding. After propensity score matching, there were 1634 patients in the antiplatelet therapy group and 1634 in the nonantiplatelet therapy group. The risk of MACCE was similar between the 2 groups (24.8% vs 24.7%; adjusted HR, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.84-1.13; P = 0.745). The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was higher in the antiplatelet therapy group than in the nonantiplatelet therapy group (2.2% vs 1.2%; aHR, 2.07; 95%CI, 1.08-4.00). These results were similar in subgroup analyses. In patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent deferred revascularization due to their FFR, antiplatelet therapy may increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding without reducing the risk of future ischemic events.

Antiplatelet agents in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis and deferred revascularization

Abstract Background There is no specific recommendation regarding optimal antiplatelet therapy after deferral of revascularization in patients with established coronary artery disease. Objectives The current study investigated safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis in whom revascularization was deferred based on fractional flow reserve (FFR). Methods In the Korean National Health Insurance Service database 2013-2020, we identified 4,657 patients who had intermediate coronary artery disease on angiography for which revascularization was deferred based on FFR. During this period, reimbursement criteria of FFR were patients with no previous evidence of myocardial ischemia and intermediate coronary artery stenosis (50-70%) by quantitative coronary angiography. Patients were then classified into two groups according to initiation of antiplatelet therapy after the index procedure. Primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, and stroke, during 5 years of follow-up. Primary safety outcome was any gastrointestinal bleeding. Results After propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio, there were 1,634 patients in antiplatelet therapy group and 1,634 in no therapy group (total N=3,268). The risk of MACCE was similar between the two groups (24.8% vs. 24.7%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-1.13; P=0.745). However, the risk of any gastrointestinal bleeding was higher in antiplatelet therapy group than no therapy group (2.2% vs. 1.2%; aHR, 2.07, 95% CI, 1.08-4.00). These results were consistently found in subgroup analyses. Conclusions In patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis with deferred revascularization based on FFR, antiplatelet therapy was not associated with reduced risk of ischemic events but increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

The influence of concomitant antiplatelet therapy in venous thromboembolism patients treated with anticoagulants in the DOAC era: insight from the COMMAND VTE Registry-2

Abstract Background/Introduction The mainstay of treatment and second prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is anticoagulation therapy, and recently direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for VTE have prevailed all over the world as oral anticoagulation therapy. Although concomitant antiplatelet therapy in addition to oral anticoagulation therapy could have an influence on both recurrent VTE and bleeding events, there have been still limited real-world data on the issue in the DOAC era. Purpose We aimed to investigate long-term clinical outcomes in VTE patients treated with concomitant antiplatelet therapy in the DOAC era. Methods The COMMAND VTE Registry-2 is a multicenter registry enrolling 5197 consecutive acute symptomatic VTE patients among 31 centers in Japan between January 2015 and August 2020. After excluding 407 patients without oral anticoagulation therapy, the current study population was consisted of 4790 VTE patients with oral anticoagulation therapy, who were divided into 374 patients (7.8%) treated with concomitant antiplatelet therapy and 4416 patients (92.2%) treated with only oral anticoagulation therapy. Results Patients with concomitant antiplatelet therapy were older (Concomitant antiplatelet therapy: 74.1 vs. Only oral anticoagulation therapy: 67.3 years, P<0.001), were less often women (52% vs 59%, P=0.005) and more frequently had history of major bleeding (9.8% vs 6.0%, P=0.003), myocardial infarction (16% vs 0.9%, P<0.001) and stroke (33% vs 6.8%, P<0.001). The cumulative incidences of recurrent VTE were not significantly different between the 2 groups (5.9% vs 9.6% at 5-year, Log rank P=0.06). Similarly, the cumulative incidences of major bleeding (14.6% vs 13.3% at 5-year, Log rank P=0.11) and stroke (8.3% vs 6.0% at 5-year, Log rank P=0.12) were not significantly different between 2 groups. However, the cumulative incidences of clinically relevant all bleeding (29.0% and 23.0% at 5-year, Log rank P=0.007) were significantly higher in concomitant antiplatelet therapy group, which was statistically significant even after adjusting confounders. Conclusion In the current large VTE registry in the DOAC era, concomitant antiplatelet therapy in addition to oral anticoagulation therapy for patients with VTE was not significantly associated with the risks recurrent VTE, major bleeding or stroke, but was associated with an increased risk of clinically relevant all bleeding.Study Flow ChartMain results

Stroke severity and outcomes in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage on anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents: an analysis from the Japan Stroke Data Bank.

Some patients with intracerebral hemorrhage are on antithrombotic agents at the time of the event and these may worsen outcome, but the relative risk of different oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents is uncertain. We determined associations between pre-onset intake of antithrombotic agents and initial stroke severity, and outcomes, in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage admitted within 24 hours after onset between January 2017 and December 2020 and recruited to the Japan Stroke Data Bank, a hospital-based multicenter prospective registry, were included. Enrolled patients were classified into four groups based on the type of antithrombotic agents being used on admission. The outcomes were the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 5-6 at discharge. Of a total 9,810 patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (4,267 females; mean age, 70±15 years), 77.1% were classified into the no-antithrombotic group, 13.2% into the antiplatelet group, 4.0% into the warfarin group, and 5.8% into the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) group. Median (interquartile range) NIHSS score on admission was 12 (5-22), 13 (5-26), 15 (5-30), and 13 (6-24), respectively, in the four groups. In multivariable analysis, the pre stroke warfarin use was associated with higher NIHSS score (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.09 [95%confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.13], with the no-antithrombotic group as the reference), but the antiplatelet group (1.00 [95%CI, 0.98-1.02]) and DOAC group (0.98 [95%CI, 0.95-1.01]) was not. The rate of mRS 5-6 at discharge was 30.8%, 41.9%, 48.6%, and 41.5%, respectively, in the four groups. In multivariable analysis, pre stroke warfarin use was associated with mRS 5-6 (adjusted odds ratio: 1.90 [95%CI, 1.28-2.81], with the no-antithrombotic group as the reference), but the antiplatelet group (1.12 [95%CI, 0.91-1.37]) and DOAC group (1.25 [95%CI, 0.88-1.77]) was not. Patients who were taking warfarin prior to intracerebral hemorrhage onset suffered more severe intracerebral hemorrhage as evidenced by higher admission NIHSS and higher discharge mRS. In contrast, no increase in severity was seen with antiplatelet agents.

Safety of Antiplatelet Therapy in Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke With Thrombocytopenia: The CASE II Study.

There is scant evidence regarding the safety of antiplatelet therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with thrombocytopenia. Our study aims to address this concern by examining AIS patients with thrombocytopenia from a large database in real-world settings. We included patients with AIS with a platelet count <100×109/L who had complete records of antiplatelet drug use. Those requiring anticoagulation or having contraindications to antiplatelet therapy were excluded. Short-term safety outcomes were in-hospital bleeding events, while the long-term safety outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. A good clinical outcome was defined as functional independence, indicated by a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 at discharge. Propensity score matched analyses were used. We screened 169 423 patients with AIS from 90 stroke centers in the CASE II register, ultimately enrolling 2808 noncardioembolic patients with thrombocytopenia. In the propensity score matched analyses, no significant difference was observed between the antiplatelet and nonantiplatelet groups in terms of intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio=0.855 [95% CI, 0.284-5.478]; P=0.160) or gastrointestinal bleeding (odds ratio=2.034 [95% CI, 0.755-5.478]; P=0.160). Antiplatelet therapy was associated with improved functional outcomes at discharge (odds ratio=1.405 [95% CI, 1.028-1.920]; P=0.033), and showed a trend towards reducing 1-year mortality (odds ratio=0.395 [95% CI, 0.152-1.031]; P=0.058). The use of antiplatelet therapy lessened as platelet count decreased in patients with AIS with thrombocytopenia. However, our findings suggest that antiplatelet medications remain safe and effective for this population.

Combining dipyridamole and cilostazol with up-dosing antihistamines improves outcomes in chronic spontaneous urticaria with high D-dimer levels: A randomized controlled trial.

In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, we investigated the effectiveness of adding antiplatelet drugs to up-dosing antihistamines for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in patients with elevated D-dimer levels who had an inadequate response to conventional antihistamine doses. Twenty patients with Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7) ≥16 and D-dimer >500 ng/mL were randomized to receive either antiplatelet therapy (cilostazol 150 mg/day + dipyridamole 50 mg/day) with antihistamine (desloratadine 20 mg/day) or antihistamine alone for 4 weeks. The antiplatelet group demonstrated a greater decrease in UAS7 compared to the control group (28.10 to 8.90 vs. 22.90 to 16.40, p < 0.001 vs. p = 0.054). Both groups experienced improved quality of life (DLQI), but the improvement was greater in the antiplatelet group (p = 0.046). D-dimer levels decreased only in the antiplatelet group (1133.67 ng/mL to 581.89 ng/mL, p = 0.013) with no significant change observed in the control group. This suggests that combining dipyridamole and cilostazol with up-dosing antihistamines may be more effective for CSU patients with high D-dimer levels compared to up-dosing antihistamines alone. This could be due to a reduction in platelet activation, as evidenced by the decrease in D-dimer levels observed in the antiplatelet group.

Aspirin Monotherapy vs No Antiplatelet Therapy in Stable Patients With Coronary Stents Undergoing Low-to-Intermediate Risk Noncardiac Surgery.

Current guidelines recommend the perioperative continuation of aspirin in patients with coronary drug-eluting stents (DES) undergoing noncardiac surgery. However, supporting evidence is limited. This study aimed to compare continuing aspirin monotherapy vs temporarily holding all antiplatelet therapy before noncardiac surgery in patients with previous DES implantation. We randomly assigned patients who had received a DES >1 year previously and were undergoing elective noncardiac surgery either to continue aspirin or to discontinue all antiplatelet agents 5days before noncardiac surgery. Antiplatelet therapy was recommended to be resumed no later than 48 hours after surgery, unless contraindicated. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke between 5days before and 30days after noncardiac surgery. A total of 1,010 patients underwent randomization. Among 926 patients in the modified intention-to-treat population (462 patients in aspirin monotherapy group and 464 patients in the no-antiplatelet therapy group), the primary composite outcome occurred in 3 patients (0.6%) in the aspirin monotherapy group and 4 patients (0.9%) in the no antiplatelet group (difference, -0.2 percentage points; 95%CI:-1.3 to 0.9; P > 0.99). There was no stent thrombosis in either group. The incidence of major bleeding did not differ significantly between groups (6.5% vs 5.2%; P=0.39), whereas minor bleeding was significantly more frequent in the aspirin group (14.9% vs 10.1%; P = 0.027). Among patients undergoing low-to-intermediate risk noncardiac surgery >1 year after stent implantation primarily with a DES, in the setting of lower-than-expected event rates, we failed to identify a significant difference between perioperative aspirin monotherapy and no antiplatelet therapy with respect to ischemic outcomes or major bleeding. (Perioperative Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Drug-eluting Stent Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery [ASSURE-DES]; NCT02797548).

Early dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with minor ischemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis

ObjectivesMinor stroke is defined by a score of 5 or less on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Prior trials have shown efficacy of short term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in secondary prevention of stroke among patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ischemic stroke, but no randomized clinical trials have studied this benefit after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Our aim was to investigate the safety of DAPT within 90 days after IVT in patients with acute minor ischemic stroke. Patients and methodsWe reviewed medical records of patients older than 18 years that received IVT between January 2015 and December 2022. Patients had a diagnosis of acute minor stroke or averted stroke (complete recovery and negative image on follow-up). Single or dual antiplatelet treatment was started 24 hours after thrombolysis according to the physician's judgment. Patients were divided in two groups: single and dual antiplatelet therapy. We assessed clinical outcome using the modified Rankin scale (mRS), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and mortality at 90 days. ResultsFifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria, 68% men aged 64±16,5 years. Seventy five percent had an ischemic stroke and 25% had an averted stroke. Median door-to-needle time was 50 minutes. Fifty one percent were in the single antiplatelet group and 49% in the dual antiplatelet therapy group. There were no differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between groups. The 90-day mRS did not show significant difference between groups. No patients had SICH nor died during follow-up. One patient in the single antiplatelet group had stroke recurrence. ConclusionsDual antiplatelet therapy after IVT with rtPA for acute minor ischemic stroke appears not to increase the risk of bleeding and mortality compared to single antiplatelet therapy in the first three months after the event. This is the first study to assess this subject in a Latin American population.

Antithrombotics alter intracerebral hemorrhage presentation without affecting minimally invasive endoscopic evacuation

ObjectivesIntracerebral hemorrhages are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While the ENRICH trial supports the efficacy of surgical evacuation for lobar hemorrhages, the impact of antithrombotic therapies on minimally invasive surgery outcomes remains unexplored. This study evaluates the effects of chronic anticoagulants and antiplatelets on the technical and longterm outcomes of minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation. Materials and MethodsA prospectively collected registry of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage from a single institution was analyzed (December 2015-September 2022). Data included key demographics, comorbidities, antithrombotic/reversal status, presenting clinical/radiographic characteristics, procedural metrics, and clinical outcomes. Patients were divided into control (neither therapy), antiplatelet-only, and anticoagulant-only groups, with antiplatelet/anticoagulant reversals conducted per current American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines. Variables significant in univariate analyses (p<0.05) were advanced to multivariable regression models. ResultsAmong 226 intracerebral hemorrhage patients treated with minimally invasive surgery, 41% (N=93) had antithrombotic medication history; 28% (N=64) received antiplatelets, and 9% (N=21) received anticoagulants. Patients on both therapies (N=6) were excluded. The antiplatelet group presented more frequently with lobar hemorrhages (56% vs. 37%; p=0.022), while patients on anticoagulants showed increased rates of intraventricular hemorrhage co-presentation (62% vs. 46%; p=0.011) compared to controls. Despite univariate analyses showing a higher postoperative hematoma volume (3.9 vs. 2.9 milliliters; p=0.020) and lower evacuation percentage (88% vs. 92%; p=0.019) for the antiplatelet group, and longer procedures for patients on anticoagulants (2.3 vs. 1.7 hours; p=0.042) compared to control, multivariable analyses indicated that antiplatelets and anticoagulants had no significant impact on these technical outcomes. Longitudinally, antithrombotics were not associated with increased rebleeding, less frequent discharge to home, lower 30-day mortality, or worse, 6-month Modified Rankin Scale scores. ConclusionsPatients on chronic antiplatelets and anticoagulants exhibited characteristic intracerebral hemorrhage phenotypes without worse technical or long-term outcomes after minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation, suggesting the procedure's safety for these patients.

Preclinical Direct Endoluminal Assessment of Endothelialization After Flow Diversion With Microangioscopy

Background Direct endoluminal imaging, such as with our previously described microangioscope, is an emerging adjunct in endovascular cerebral aneurysm management that enables clinicians to delineate between thrombi and visualize neoepithelialization after stent placement with high resolution. The present study sought to study flow diversion in vivo under direct endoluminal imaging, and to validate our findings with histopathology. Methods In a rabbit model, we implanted each left common carotid artery with a shielded flow diverter (FD) (Medtronic Pipeline Vantage) and nonshielded FD (Medtronic Pipeline Flex) in the right common carotid artery. We studied 9 animals in 3 groups: (1) no periprocedural antiplatelet therapy, (2) aspirin 81 mg daily, and (3) aspirin 81 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg daily. FD thrombosis, stenosis, malapposition, and neoepithelialization were all evaluated by diagnostic cerebral angiography and microangioscopy after 30 days. Diagnostic cerebral angiography and angioscopic video were analyzed by independent evaluators and compared with histopathologic analysis. Results In the aspirin and dual antiplatelet therapy groups, there were no significant observed differences in stent thrombosis, stenosis, malapposition, or neoepithelialization between the shielded and non‐shielded FD groups. There was significantly more thrombus formation in Group 1. Neointimal thickness as measured by the microangioscope was highly correlated with histology (r = 0.72; P = 0.016). Interrater agreement of microangioscope videos was highest for FD thrombosis and stenosis. Conclusion In‐stent thrombosis, stenosis, malapposition, and neopithelialization demonstrated no significant difference between shielded and non‐shielded FDs. Microangioscopy measurements for neointimal thickness were highly correlated with pathology and may be a helpful adjunct to diagnostic cerebral angiography in FD follow‐up.

Risk Factors, Antithrombotic Management, and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

Patients receiving endovascular treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) face varying risks and benefits with antithrombotic management. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative and long-term effects of antithrombotic strategies, identify the populations that would benefit, and explore the predictive factors affecting the long-term outcomes. UIA patients undergoing endovascular treatment including stent-assisted coiling or flow diversion between June 2019 and June 2022 were enrolled. We compared perioperative and long-term complications between tirofiban and dual antiplatelet therapy groups. Optimal candidates for each antithrombotic treatment were identified using multivariate logistic regression. Nomograms were developed to determine the significant predictors for thromboembolic complications during follow-up. Among 181 propensity-score matched pairs, the tirofiban group showed a trend toward a lower rate of thromboembolic complications than the DAPT group without elevating major bleeding risk in either period. Homocysteine (Hcy) level ≥10 μmol/L was a significant independent factor associated with thromboembolic complication in both periods. Subgroup analysis highlighted that in patients with high Hcy levels, tirofiban and sustained antiplatelet treatment for ≥12 months were protective factors, while a history of stroke was an independent risk factor for thromboembolic events in follow-up. Four variables were selected to construct a prognostic nomogram, history of hypertension, prior stroke, Hcy level, and the duration of antiplatelet therapy. Perioperative low-dose tirofiban and extended antiplatelet therapy demonstrated a favorable trend in long-term outcomes for UIA patients with preoperative Hcy levels ≥10 μmol/L undergoing endovascular treatment. The prognostic model offers reliable risk prediction and guides antithrombotic strategy decisions.

Systolic blood pressure and early neurological deterioration in minor stroke: A post hoc analysis of ARAMIS trial.

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was a predictor of early neurological deterioration (END) in stroke. We performed a secondary analysis of ARAMIS trial to investigate whether baseline SBP affects the effect of dual antiplatelet versus intravenous alteplase on END. This post hoc analysis included patients in the as-treated analysis set. According to SBP at admission, patients were divided into SBP ≥140 mmHg and SBP <140 mmHg subgroups. In each subgroup, patients were further classified into dual antiplatelet and intravenous alteplase treatment groups based on study drug actually received. Primary outcome was END, defined as an increase of ≥2 in the NIHSS score from baseline within 24 h. We investigated effect of dual antiplatelet vs intravenous alteplase on END in SBP subgroups and their interaction effect with subgroups. A total of 723 patients from as-treated analysis set were included: 344 were assigned into dual antiplatelet group and 379 into intravenous alteplase group. For primary outcome, there was more treatment effect of dual antiplatelet in SBP ≥140 mmHg subgroup (adjusted RD, -5.2%; 95% CI, -8.2% to -2.3%; p < 0.001) and no effect in SBP <140 mmHg subgroup (adjusted RD, -0.1%; 95% CI, -8.0% to 7.7%; p = 0.97), but no significant interaction between subgroups was found (adjusted p = 0.20). Among patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke, dual antiplatelet may be better than alteplase with respect to preventing END within 24 h when baseline SBP ≥140 mmHg.

Antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery bypass surgery: five year follow-up of randomised DACAB trial

ObjectiveTo assess the effect of different antiplatelet strategies on clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting.DesignFive year follow-up of randomised Different Antiplatelet Therapy Strategy After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (DACAB)...

Ticagrelor potentiates cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning: the ticagrelor in remote ischemic preconditioning (TRIP) randomized clinical trial

ObjectiveRemote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduces periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through various pathways, including an adenosine-triggered pathway. Ticagrelor inhibits adenosine uptake, thus may potentiate the effects of RIPC. This randomized trial tested the hypothesis that ticagrelor potentiates the effect of RIPC and reduces PMI, assessed by post-procedural troponin release. MethodsPatients undergoing PCI for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes were 1:1 randomized to ticagrelor (TG-Group) or clopidogrel (CL-Group). Within each treatment, patients were 1:1 randomized to a RIPC (RIPC-Group) or a control group (CTRL-Group). The primary endpoint was the difference between post- and pre-procedural troponin at 24 h following PCI, termed deltaTnI. ResultsDuring a 12-month period, 138 patients were included in the study (34 in the CL-CTRL group, 34 in the TG-CTRL group, 35 in the CL-RIPC group, and 35 in the TG-CTRL group). There was a significant difference in deltaTnI between the study groups [ TG-RIPC:0.04 (0–0.16), CL-CTRL:0.10 (0.03–0.43), CLRIPC:0.11 (0.03–0.89), and TG-CTRL:0.24 (0.06–0.47); p = 0.007]. Eight patients (22.9%) in the TG-RIPC group developed type 4a myocardial infarction (MI), compared to 14 (40%) in the CL-RIPC group, 13 (38.2%) in the CL-CTRL group, and 19 (55.9%) in the TG-CTRL group (p = 0.048). A significant interaction between antiplatelet group allocation and RIPC on deltaTnI was observed [F (1,134) = 7.509; p = 0.007]. In multivariate analysis, the interaction between RIPC and ticagrelor treatment was independently associated with a lower incidence of Type 4a MI. ConclusionOur results demonstrate an interaction between ticagrelor and RIPC, which may potentiate the cardioprotective effects of RIPC during PCI by reducing PMI.

P.117 Antiplatelet and anticoagulation use and outcomes following chronic subdural hematoma drainage: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgical condition which can be treated with surgical evacuation. A significant percentage of CSDH patients are on antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy at baseline which may influence risk of recurrence and postoperative thromboembolic events Methods: A search was conducted in MEDLINE (1946 to April 6, 2023), Embase (1974 to April 6, 2023), and PubMed (up to April 6, 2023) on preoperative use of antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy and outcomes following surgical evacuation of CSDH. Results: Our literature includes 14,410 patients ifrom 42 studies, with 3218 (22%) in the antiplatelet (AP) group, 1731(12%) in the anticoagulation (AC) group, and 9537 (66%) in the no antithrombotics (NA) group. The AP group had significantly higher recurrence compared to NA (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.40, p = 0.01). The AC group also had significantly high recurrence compared to NA (OR = 1.39. 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.68, p = 0.0007). However, being on any antithrombotic therapy is also associated with significantly higher thromboembolic events (OR 5.41, 95% CI 3.16 to 9.26, p &lt; 0.00001). Conclusions: Patients on antithrombotic therapy have both higher recurrence and higher thromboembolic risk compared to patients not on antithrombotic therapy.

The impact of various antiplatelet strategies on the incidence of gouty arthritis in hospitalized patients with acute cerebral infarction

Objectives1.To explore the incidence of concurrent gouty arthritis (GA) during hospitalization in patients with different subtypes of acute stroke.2.To investigate disparities in acute cerebral infarction patients with coexisting GA undergoing various antiplatelet strategies. Materials and methodsData from acute stroke patients admitted to the Affiliated Panyu Central Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, from January 2019 to December 2021, underwent screening. The incidence of GA in acute stroke patients of various subtypes were analyzed. Subsequently, we divided cerebral infarction cases into three cohorts based on distinct antiplatelet therapies: the aspirin group, the dual antiplatelet therapy group (DAPT，aspirin plus clopidogrel), and the clopidogrel group. Investigate disparities in acute cerebral infarction patients with coexisting GA undergoing various antiplatelet strategies. ResultsA total of 12,381 patients with acute stroke were screened in this study. The incidence of GA in various subtypes of acute stroke was as follows: cerebral infarction (3.56 %, n = 9890), TIA (1.81 %, n = 443), cerebral hemorrhag (0.64 %, n = 1713), and SAH (0.30 %, n = 335). The incidence of GA in patients with ischemic stroke is higher than that of hemorrhagic stroke (χ2 = 49.258, p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of GA among three different antiplatelet therapy groups. But there was marginal statistical difference in the incidence of GA between the aspirin group and the DAPT group (P = 0.051), as well as between the clopidogrel group and the DAPT group (P = 0.059). ConclusionsThe incidence of GA in patients with ischemic stroke is higher than that of hemorrhagic stroke. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of GA in acute cerebral infarction across various antiplatelet Strategies. The marginal statistical difference in the incidence of GA between the single antiplatelet group and the DAPT group requires further investigation.

Anticoagulants versus Antiplatelet Treatment in the Medical Management of Carotid Floating Thrombus

Carotid free-floating thrombus (CFT) is a rare cause of stroke describing an intraluminal thrombus that is loosely associated with the arterial wall and manifesting as a filling defect fully surrounded by flow on vascular imaging. Unfortunately, there is no clear consensus among experts on the ideal treatment for this pathology. Retrospective analysis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients diagnosed with CFT on computed tomography angiogram (CTA) between January 2015-March 2023. We aimed to compare two treatment regimens: anticoagulation (ACT) and antiplatelet (APT) in the treatment of CFT. APT regimens included the use of dual or single antiplatelets (DAPT or SAPT; aspirin, clopidogrel and ticagrelor) and ACT regimens included the use of direct oral anticoagulants, warfarin, heparin or low molecular weight heparin +/- ASA. Patients that underwent mechanical thrombectomy were excluded. During study time there were 8252 acute ischemic stroke hospitalizations, of which 135 (1.63 %) patients were diagnosed with CFT. Sixty-six patients were included in our analysis. Patients assigned to APT were older (60.41years ± 12.82;p < 0.01). Other demographic variables were similar between ACT and APT groups. Complete CFT resolution on repeat vascular imaging was numerically higher at 30 days (58.8 vs 31.6 %, respectively; p = 0.1) and at latest follow-up (70.8 vs 50 %; p = 0.1) on ACT vs APT, respectively without reaching statistical significance. Similarly, there was numerically higher rates of any ICH with ACT compared to APT but it did not achieve statistical significance (27.6 % vs 13.5 %; p = 0.5). There were similar rates of PH1/2 hemorrhagic transformation, independence at discharge and similar hospital length of stay between ACT and APT groups. Patients assigned to APT were more likely to be discharged on their assigned treatment compared to those assigned to ACT (86.5 vs 55.2 %; p < 0.001). The rate of 30-day recurrent stroke was comparable among ACT and APT at 30 days (3.4 vs 0 %; p = 0.1, respectively). Subgroup analysis comparing exclusive ACT vs Dual APT lead to similar results. Our study showed comparable efficacy and safety outcomes in CFT patients who were exclusively managed medically with ACT vs APT. Larger prospective studies are needed.

Dextran-40 Reduces Partial Flap Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis for Antithrombotics after Free Flaps.

Antithrombotic agents are used after free-flap surgery to prevent thrombus formation and improve flap outcomes. However, the reports vary. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the need for antithrombotic agents in this context. We searched for studies that compared the outcomes of patients undergoing free-flap surgery with or without postoperative antithrombotic agents in the PubMed, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The primary outcome was total flap failure, with secondary outcomes including partial flap failure, pedicle thrombosis, and bleeding/hematoma. The relative risks (RRs) of outcomes with or without antithrombotic use were evaluated. Fifteen studies (n = 6755 cases) were included. Antithrombotic agents did not reduce flap failure or pedicle thrombosis risks but increased bleeding and hematoma risks (RR, 1.535). Subgroup analyses by antiplatelet and anticoagulant use demonstrated results similar to those of antithrombotic use. The RR of bleeding/hematoma was 1.761 and 2.740 in the antiplatelet and anticoagulant groups, respectively. Postoperative dextran-40 administration reduced the risk of partial flap failure, with an RR of 0.535. Postoperative antithrombotic, antiplatelet, or anticoagulant use did not change the risk of total/partial flap failure or pedicle thrombosis but increased the risk of hematoma/bleeding. Postoperative use of dextran-40 reduced the risk of partial flap failure. Increased intraflap blood flow may decrease the risk of partial flap failure. However, dextran-40 may cause severe pulmonary distress. Further prospective studies are required to evaluate the effects of these agents on thrombus formation, intraflap blood flow, and partial flap failure risk.

Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin vs Aspirin Alone in Patients With Acute Mild to Moderate Stroke

Dual antiplatelet therapy has been demonstrated to be superior to single antiplatelet in reducing recurrent stroke among patients with transient ischemic attack or minor stroke, but robust evidence for its effect in patients with mild to moderate ischemic stroke is lacking. To evaluate whether dual antiplatelet therapy is superior to single antiplatelet among patients with mild to moderate ischemic stroke. This was a multicenter, open-label, blinded end point, randomized clinical trial conducted at 66 hospitals in China from December 20, 2016, through August 9, 2022. The date of final follow-up was October 30, 2022. The analysis was reported on March 12, 2023. Of 3065 patients with ischemic stroke, 3000 patients with acute mild to moderate stroke within 48 hours of symptom onset were enrolled, after excluding 65 patients who did not meet eligibility criteria or had no randomization outcome. Within 48 hours after symptom onset, patients were randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel plus aspirin (n = 1541) or aspirin alone (n = 1459) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary end point was early neurologic deterioration at 7 days, defined as an increase of 2 or more points in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, but not as a result of cerebral hemorrhage, compared with baseline. The superiority of clopidogrel plus aspirin to aspirin alone was assessed based on a modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomized participants with at least 1 efficacy evaluation regardless of treatment allocation. Bleeding events were safety end points. Of the 3000 randomized patients, 1942 (64.6%) were men, the mean (SD) age was 65.9 (10.6) years, median (IQR) NIHSS score at admission was 5 (4-6), and 1830 (61.0%) had a stroke of undetermined cause. A total of 2915 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Early neurologic deterioration occurred in 72 of 1502 (4.8%) in the dual antiplatelet therapy group vs 95 of 1413 (6.7%) in the aspirin alone group (risk difference -1.9%; 95% CI, -3.6 to -0.2; P = .03). Similar bleeding events were found between 2 groups. Among Chinese patients with acute mild to moderate ischemic stroke, clopidogrel plus aspirin was superior to aspirin alone with regard to reducing early neurologic deterioration at 7 days with similar safety profile. These findings indicate that dual antiplatelet therapy may be a superior choice to aspirin alone in treating patients with acute mild to moderate stroke. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02869009.

Prasugrel Single Antiplatelet Therapy versus Aspirin and Clopidogrel Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Flow Diverter Treatment for Cerebral Aneurysms: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

The optimal antiplatelet regimen after flow diverter treatment of cerebral aneurysms is still a matter of debate. A single antiplatelet therapy might be advantageous in determined clinical scenarios. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of prasugrel single antiplatelet therapy versus aspirin and clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy. We performed a post hoc analysis of 4 retrospective multicenter studies including ruptured and unruptured aneurysms treated with flow diversion using either prasugrel single antiplatelet therapy or dual antiplatelet therapy. Primary end points were the occurrence of any kind of procedure- or device-related thromboembolic complications and complete aneurysm occlusion at the latest radiologic follow-up (mean, 18 months). Dichotomized comparisons of outcomes were performed between single antiplatelet therapy and dual antiplatelet therapy. Additionally, the influence of various patient- and aneurysm-related variables on the occurrence of thromboembolic complications was investigated using multivariable backward logistic regression. A total of 222 patients with 251 aneurysms were included, 90 (40.5%) in the single antiplatelet therapy and 132 (59.5%) in the dual antiplatelet therapy group. The primary outcome-procedure- or device-related thromboembolic complications-occurred in 6 patients (6.6%) of the single antiplatelet therapy and in 12 patients (9.0%) of the dual antiplatelet therapy group (P = .62; OR, 0.712; 95% CI, 0.260-1.930). The primary treatment efficacy end point was reached in 82 patients (80.4%) of the single antiplatelet therapy and in 115 patients (78.2%) of the dual antiplatelet therapy group (P = .752; OR, 1.141; 95% CI, 0.599-2.101). Logistic regression showed that non-surface-modified flow diverters (P = .014) and fusiform aneurysm morphology (P = .004) significantly increased the probability of thromboembolic complications. Prasugrel single antiplatelet therapy after flow diverter treatment may be as safe and effective as dual antiplatelet therapy and could, therefore, be a valid alternative in selected patients. Further prospective comparative studies are required to validate our findings.