Anti-osteoporotic Medication Research Articles

7793 Bone Mineral Density, Turnover And Bone Microarchitecture Alterations With Dapagliflozin In Post-menopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Open-Label, Parallel-Arm, Randomized, Controlled Study

Abstract Disclosure: S.K. Bhadada: None. L. Das: None. M. Baruah: None. V. Singla: None. V. Dhiman: None. S. Ram: None. S. Sharma: None. N. Sachdeva: None. P. Dutta: None. Introduction: Evidence is limited and there is no consensus about the effects of SGLT2i on bone metabolism. The objective of the current study was to assess changes in bone mineral density (BMD), turnover markers (BTMs), and microarchitecture with the use of dapagliflozin in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Post-menopausal women (<65 years) with T2DM (both menopause and T2DM duration > 5 years and HbA1c 7-11%) were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either add-on dapagliflozin with standard-of-care or standard-of-care alone for T2DM management. Those with osteoporosis, on anti—osteoporotic medication, chronic glucocorticoids (>3 months), thiazolidinediones, phenytoin, tamoxifen, estrogen, eGFR<30ml/min/1.73m2, contraindication/past usage of SGLT2i, or with known endocrinopathy were excluded. Patients were made Vitamin D sufficient [25(OH)D > 30ng/ml] with oral cholecalciferol (60K daily for 1 week), if deficient. BMD (DXA, Hologic), BTMs (P1NP, CTX) and microarchitecture were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Results: A total of 131 patients were screened, of which 101 were randomized (50 dapagliflozin, 51 non-dapagliflozin). The mean age (± SD) in the dapagliflozin group was 58.1 ± 5.8 years, diabetes duration was 9.4 ± 5.2 years and HbA1c was 8.5 ± 1.7%. Baseline clinico-biochemical, areal BMD, volumetric BMD, trabecular structural (number, thickness, separation) and cortical structural (thickness and porosity) parameters were comparable between both groups. Only cortical pore diameter (Ct.Po.Dm) (±SD) at radius (0.199 ± 0.04 vs 0.180 ± 0.03, p =0.01) and tibia (0.256 ± 0.04 vs 0.226 ± 0.03, p =0.001) were higher in the dapagliflozin than the non-dapagliflozin group. At 6 months, BMD at lumbar spine (LS), hip, femoral neck (FN), and distal radius and BTMs were comparable between the dapagliflozin (n=38) and the non-dapagliflozin (n=39) groups. However, there was significantly higher trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) (0.230 ± 0.02 vs 0.218 ± 0.01, p=0.003), cortical thickness (Co.Th) (1.104 ± 0.2 vs 0.998 ± 0.2, p=0.04), intra-cortical porosity (Ct.Po) (0.008 ± 0.005 vs 0.005 ± 0.003, p= 0.020) and Ct.Po.Dm (0.192 ± 0.03 vs 0.169 ± 0.02, p=0.003), all at radius in the dapagliflozin group. At 12 months follow-up, BMD (g/cm2) at all 4 sites were again comparable between the dapagliflozin (n=36) and non-dapagliflozin (n=36) groups. Serum CTX (pg/ml) (388.8 ± 191.5 vs 327.4 ± 140.8, p = 0.06), and P1NP (ng/ml) (38.8 ± 16.3 vs 32.5 ± 16.3, p = 0.12) were non-significantly higher with dapagliflozin use. Among microarchitecture parameters, only Ct.Po.Dm at the radius (0.189 ± 0.03 vs 0.169 ± 0.03, p= 0.025) and tibia (0.251 ± 0.05 vs 0.228 ± 0.03, p= 0.030) remained significantly higher in the dapagliflozin group. Conclusion: Dapagliflozin has no long-term detrimental effects on BMD, BTMs or bone microarchitecture after 1 year of treatment in postmenopausal women with T2DM. Presentation: 6/1/2024

12344 Four-Month Delay In Denosumab Induced Severe Hypocalcemia And Hypophosphatemia. Case Report

Abstract Disclosure: M.M. Eid: None. S. Reutrakul: None. Introduction: Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa Β ligand, blocks osteoclast function and reduces bone resorption. Case: A 91 year old male with history of osteoporosis, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and prostate cancer. Presented with fatigue and cold intolerance. Denied confusion, muscle cramp, perioral numbness/tingling, bowel habit change. Medications included empagliflozin 12.5 mg/day, leuprorelin 45 mg every 6 months since 2021 and cholecalciferol 1000IU/day. On examination, he was alert and oriented x 3 with stable vital signs. No thyromegaly. Chvostek's sign was negative. Labs: serum calcium (Ca) 6.5 mg/dl, corrected Ca (Co Ca) 6.7mg/dl(N 8.7-10.4), ionized Ca 0.7mMol/l (N 1.13-1.32), TSH 131uIU/ml (N 0.55-4.78), free T4 0.72ng/dl (N 0.89-1.76), creatinine 1.55mg/dl, GFR 42ml/min/1.73m2, HbA1C 6.1%. EKG with corrected QT interval of 499 msec. Hypocalcemia work up : parathyroid hormone (PTH) 762 pg/ml (N 18.4-80.1), 25 OH vitamin D (Vit D) 37ng/ml (N 30-100), 1,25 OH Vit D 77pg/ml (N 18-72), phosphorus (Phos) 1mg/dl (N 2.4-5.1), magnesium (Mag) 1.7mg/dl (N 1.6-2.6),ALP 59U/L(N 45-117). Clinical impressions were a new diagnosis of primary hypothyroidism and non PTH mediated hypocalcemia with secondary hyperparathyroidism. A thorough review of medication revealed that he received the first dose of denosumab 60 mg 4 months prior to this presentation. Baseline labs 1 month prior to denosumab: Ca/Co Ca 9.1/9.2mg/dl, Phos 4.5mg/dl, PTH 199.6pg/ml, Mag 2.1mg/dl,TSH 2.72 uIU/ml. 2 months after denosumab administration, serum Ca/Co Ca 8.8/8.6mg/dl. He was admitted and received Ca gluconate 2gm IV pushes, calcitriol 0.5 mcg/day and levothyroxine 50 mcg/day and kept on cardiac monitoring. He remained asymptomatic. On the 5th day, serum Ca/Co Ca 8.4/8.6mg/dl, Phos 3mg/dl, Mag 2mg/dl. He was discharged on oral Ca Carbonate, calcitriol and levothyroxine. The second denosumab dose was cancelled. Conclusion: Denosumab is an effective anti-osteoporotic medication but can cause hypocalcemia. The risks for denosumab induced hypocalcemia include renal impairment, Vit D deficiency and lack of Ca/Vit D supplementation. Hypocalcemia usually occurs 1 - 2 weeks after denosumab, corresponding to its peak of action. Checking serum Ca and Vit D with correction of deficiencies before starting denosumab is recommended. In high risk patients with CKD, daily Ca and Vit D supplements are recommended (1). Our case has CKD and developed severe hypocalcemia and hypophosphatemia 4 months after receiving denosumab without other apparent causes for hypocalcemia. Hypothyroidism is likely an incidental diagnosis and not contributing to hypocalcemia in the absence of rhabdomyolysis. Reference: 1.Jalleh R, Basu G, Leu RL, Jesudason S: Denosumab induced severe hypocalcemia in chronic kidney disease. Case Rep Nephrol.2018 Presentation: 6/2/2024

Systematic screening for multimorbidities in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases enhanced preventive medication use and reduced hospitalisations: an exposed-non-exposed study

RationalStudies are needed to determine if multimorbidity screening and management reduce the rate of multimorbidity accumulation in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD).ObjectivesThis study evaluates the impact of systematic...

New Emerging Aspect of Herbal Extracts for the Treatment of Osteoporosis: Overview.

As the global population ages, osteoporosis is becoming a more common silent disease. Osteoporosis is characterized by decreased bone quality and strength, which increases the risk of fragility fractures in the elderly. According to estimates, 50% of women eventually suffer from an osteoporotic fracture. Due to increasing disability, more frequent hospital hospitalizations, and most critically, fragility fractures have been linked to a reduced quality of life. Osteoporotic fractures have been linked to an increased mortality risk; and must be considered in awareness as a serious health concern. There are anti-osteoporotic medications available that improve bone quality. Considering the availability of various treatment options, still there are a lot of underserved needs in the treatment of fractures and osteoporosis. For example, the application of natural products and herbal resources for fracture healing, because of the androgen-like and antioxidant characteristics of the plants, they can play a crucial for accelerating the repair of bone fractures. In this article, we'll discuss the herbal remedies that are essential for treating osteoporosis (bone disease).

Sarcopenia and self-reported markers of physical frailty in patients with osteoporosis

SummaryBone and muscle impairment, named osteoporosis and sarcopenia, may co-occur with age, and patients with both disorders might exhibit physical frailty. One-hundred sixty-three patients were included. 14.2% had both disorders and presented more frequent with previous fall, reduced daily activity level, walk/balance challenges, and need of walking aid, indicating overall frailty.PurposeIn older adults, sarcopenia (muscle impairment) and physical frailty may accompany osteoporosis (bone brittleness), yet osteoporosis is typically assessed without evaluating these conditions, even though coexistence may contribute to exacerbated negative health outcomes. We aimed at evaluating the prevalence of sarcopenia and impaired muscle domains in osteoporotic patients and explore the risk of osteosarcopenia from markers of physical frailty.MethodsIn Copenhagen, Denmark, osteoporotic patients aged 65 + were assessed cross-sectionally in 2018–2019. Evaluations included muscle mass, strength, and function; bone mineral density; and self-reported physical activity, fall, balance challenges, dizziness, and the need of walking aid. Low bone mass, low-energy fracture, or treatment with anti-osteoporotic medication defined patient with osteoporosis, and sarcopenia was defined by low muscle strength and mass. Osteosarcopenia was defined from the coexistence of both conditions.ResultsOne-hundred sixty-three patients with osteoporosis were included. Of those, 23 (14.2%) exhibited sarcopenia, hence osteosarcopenia. Hand-grip-strength, 30-s-chair-stand-test, relative-appendicular-lean-muscle-mass, and gait-speed were below cut-off levels in 21.0%, 30.9%, 28.8%, and 23.6% of the patients, respectively.Previous fall, activity level, walk and balance challenges, and need of walking aid were statistically (or borderline) significantly more often affected in the osteosarcopenic group compared with the solely osteoporotic. Logistic regression analysis, however, revealed that only the need for walking aid significantly increased the risk of an osteosarcopenia diagnosis (odds ratio 5.54, 95% CI (1.95–15.76), p < 0.01).ConclusionsSarcopenia and impaired muscle domains were frequent in osteoporotic patients, as were markers of physical frailty, indicating the need of thorough examination of osteoporotic patients.

MRONJ: medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw from a viewpoint of physicians prescribing anti-osteoporotic medication

MRONJ: medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw from a viewpoint of physicians prescribing anti-osteoporotic medication

Drug utilization pattern of romosozumab and other osteoporosis treatments in Japan, 2019-2021.

Describe real-world treatment of osteoporosis and romosozumab treatment patterns in Japan. Data for patients initiating romosozumab or other antiosteoporotic medications between March 01, 2018, and May 31, 2022, were extracted from the Medical Data Vision (MDV) and Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) databases. Patients were categorized into four cohorts: those who newly initiated romosozumab within the first (MDV: n = 4782; JMDC: n = 2578) or second (MDV: n = 3888; JMDC: n = 2446) year after launch and those who initiated teriparatide (TPTD; MDV: n = 14,576; JMDC: n = 8259) or non-TPTD antiosteoporotic medications within the first year of romosozumab launch (MDV: n = 352,142; JMDC: n = 185,785). Mean age, sex, baseline cardiovascular history, comorbidities, and concomitant medications were similar across cohorts. In the MDV database, fracture history was higher in the romosozumab year-1 (59.3%), year-2 (64.1%), and TPTD (65.5%) cohorts versus the non-TPTD cohort (24.4%). Similar rates were identified in the JMDC database: romosozumab year-1 (64.7%), year-2 (66.6%), TPTD (67.5%), and non-TPTD (27.8%). Vertebral fractures were most common in all cohorts. 12-month romosozumab discontinuation varied between the year-1 and year-2 cohorts in MDV (62.4% and 58.8%) and JMDC (57.1% and 52.7%), whereas mean number of injections remained consistent (MDV: 9.7 and 9.8; JMDC: 7.3 and 7.8). Romosozumab persistence was lower in year-1 versus year-2 (MDV: 37.6% and 42.9%; JMDC: 41.2% and 47.3%). Patients initiating romosozumab and TPTD had a high fracture history. Given the dual effects of promoting bone formation and suppressing resorption, improving romosozumab adherence and persistence over time may be important for antiosteoporotic therapy.

Incidence of four major osteoporotic fragility fractures among older individuals in Sado, Japan, in 2020.

This study compared the 2020 incidence of fragility fractures in Sado City with those from 2004 to 2015. Data from patients aged ≥ 60years living in Sado City with fragility fractures in the hip, vertebral, distal radius, and proximal humerus between January 1 and December 31, 2020, were collected. We examined the number and incidence of four types of osteoporotic fractures in the older population aged ≥ 60years living in Sado City in 2020. We compared the results with those of the 2004, 2010, and 2015 surveys, examining the temporal change and trend in the incidence of the four fracture types in this population. We investigated the use rate of anti-osteoporotic medications and the relationship between their administration and the occurrence of fragility fractures. The age-specific incidence of hip fractures slightly decreased from 2015. However, the incidence of the other three fractures slightly increased, although the difference was not statistically significant. The incidence of hip fractures markedly increased in the 80s. In 2020, the percentage of patients taking anti-osteoporotic agents before the occurrence of fractures decreased to 12.4% from 14.5% in 2015; it increased from 4% in 2004 to 7.6% in 2010. The 2020 incidence of the four fractures did not decrease, and the percentage of patients receiving anti-osteoporotic agents did not increase. A higher frequency of osteoporosis treatment is necessary to reduce the incidence of fragility fractures. We recommend using anti-osteoporotic agents to prevent hip fractures among individuals in their mid-70s and above.

Anabolic treatment for osteoporosis and fragility fracture risk: one year in review 2024.

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disease characterised by reduced bone mass and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, underlying a higher risk of fragility fractures. Several options are available for its treatment, including both anti-resorptive and anabolic agents. The present review discusses and summarises the most recent literature on anabolic treatment, with a focus on abaloparatide, and on the assessment of fragility fracture risk, with a focus on trabecular bone score. Finally, we provide a discussion on the effects of different antiosteoporotic medications in terms of fragility fracture risk reduction.

Equivalence in osteoporosis workup and management after femoral neck fracture fixation and vertebral compression fracture cement augmentation: A single-center retrospective study highlighting persistent underdiagnosis and undertreatment

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate pre- and post-fracture medical management of osteoporosis among patients who underwent surgical fixation of femoral neck fractures (FNF) and vertebral compression fractures (VCF), and to investigate if there is a difference in treatment, management, and subsequent fractures between FNF and VCF patients. MethodsPatients who underwent surgical fixation of FNF or VCF were retrospectively reviewed at a minimum 1 year follow up. Patients were excluded if their fracture was caused by high energy trauma or malignancy, <50 years-old, deceased, or lost to follow up. Patient demographics such as age, sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status Classification System and Charleston Comorbidity index were recorded. Management of osteoporosis, including medication regimen and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans were assessed preoperatively and at minimum one year follow up. Subsequent fractures were also recorded. ResultsIn the analysis of 370 patients (74.7% FNF, 25.2% VCF), demographics showed a predominantly female population (mean age 78.1). Preoperatively, 21.6% were diagnosed with osteoporosis, consistent between FNF and VCF. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in new osteoporosis diagnoses, bisphosphonate use, or subsequent fractures. VCF patients, however, were more likely to receive denosumab and post-operative DEXA scans (p < 0.05). Within a year, 6.2% experienced subsequent fractures, with no significant FNF-VCF difference. Only 12.7% received appropriate post-operative osteoporosis treatment, 27.1% had DEXA scans, and 25% had a recorded osteoporosis diagnosis. Multivariable analysis highlighted pre-fracture osteoporosis diagnosis as the sole predictor for post-operative DEXA scans and anti-osteoporotic medication (p < 0.001). ConclusionsThis study suggests that factors beyond the type of fragility fracture may influence subsequent fracture risk and anti-osteoporotic medication administration in elderly patients. These findings underscore the importance of a comprehensive approach to fracture risk assessment and treatment decisions in this population. Level of evidenceIII.

The effect of long-term alendronic acid treatment on Modic changes in the lumbar spine: a gender and age-matched study

BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) affects a significant proportion of the adult population. Potent anti-resorptive drugs such as intravenous zoledronic acid have been demonstrated to reduce Modic changes (MCs) upon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine and concomitantly decrease associated LBP. It is uncertain whether oral alendronic acid has a similar effect.Methods82 subjects were recruited in this case-control study. Treatment subjects (n = 41) received oral alendronic acid treatment for at least 1-year and were matched by gender and age (± 2) to control subjects (n = 41) not receiving any anti-osteoporotic medication. The prevalence, type, and extent of MCs were quantified upon T1 and T2-weighted MRIs of the lumbosacral spine.ResultsTreatment subjects received oral alendronic acid for 124.0 ± 62.1 weeks at the time of MRI assessment and exhibited a lower prevalence of MCs over the lumbosacral spine (18/41 vs. 30/41, p < 0.001) as compared to control subjects. Amongst both groups, type 2 MCs were predominant. Quantification of type 2 MCs in treatment subjects revealed a significant reduction in area (113 ± 106 mm2 vs. 231 ± 144 mm2, p < 0.01) and volume (453 ± 427 mm3 vs. 925 ± 575 mm3, p < 0.01) affected by type 2 MCs in comparison to matched controls.ConclusionOral alendronic acid may be useful in the treatment of MC-associated LBP in patients with concomitant osteoporosis.

Pre-treatment bone mineral density and the benefit of pharmacologic treatment on fracture risk and BMD change: analysis from the FNIH-ASBMR SABRE project.

Some osteoporosis drug trials have suggested that treatment is more effective in those with low BMD measured by DXA. This study used data from a large set of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine whether the anti-fracture efficacy of treatments differs according to baseline BMD. We used individual patient data from 25 RCTs (103 086 subjects) of osteoporosis medications collected as part of the FNIH-ASBMR SABRE project. Participants were stratified into FN BMD T-score subgroups (≤-2.5, > -2.5). We used Cox proportional hazard regression to estimate treatment effect for clinical fracture outcomes and logistic regression for the radiographic vertebral fracture outcome. We also performed analyses based on BMD quintiles. Overall, 42% had a FN BMD T-score ≤ -2.5. Treatment with anti-osteoporosis drugs led to significant reductions in fractures in both T-score ≤ -2.5 and > -2.5 subgroups. Compared to those with FN BMD T-score > -2.5, the risk reduction for each fracture outcome was greater in those with T-score ≤ -2.5, but only the all-fracture outcome reached statistical significance (interaction P = .001). Results were similar when limited to bisphosphonate trials. In the quintile analysis, there was significant anti-fracture efficacy across all quintiles for vertebral fractures and with greater effects on fracture risk reduction for non-vertebral, all, and all clinical fractures in the lower BMD quintiles (all interaction P ≤ .03). In summary, anti-osteoporotic medications reduced the risk of fractures regardless of baseline BMD. Significant fracture risk reduction with treatment for 4 of the 5 fracture endpoints was seen in participants with T-scores above -2.5, though effects tended to be larger and more significant in those with baseline T-scores <-2.5.

Calcium-based phosphate binders and bone mineral density in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a retrospective cohort study.

Calcium supplements are commonly prescribed to prevent fractures in patients with osteoporosis. Nonetheless, they are generally eschewed in hemodialysis patients because they increase vascular calcification and induce cardiovascular disease. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the effect of calcium-based phosphate binders (CBPB) on bone mineral density (BMD) in hemodialysis patients. Outpatients on dialysis who underwent BMD measurement from January to December 2017, whose data on BMD trends and CBPB administration were recorded over the next 4years, were enrolled. Patients receiving anti-osteoporotic medications were excluded. The association between the presence and duration of CBPB administration and changes in BMD was evaluated. The femoral neck's BMD decreased from 0.836g/cm2 (0.702-0.952) to 0.764g/cm2 (0.636-0.896) (P < 0.001) in the non-CBPB group (patients who never received CBPB over 4years, n = 32). The CBPB group (n = 56) exhibited only a minute decrease from 0.833g/cm2 (0.736-0.965) to 0.824g/cm2 (0.706-0.939) (P = 0.004). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed better BMD maintenance in the CBPB group [β-coefficient (95% CI): 0.033 (0.001-0.065); P = 0.046] than in the non-CBPB group. Additionally, the prolonged-CBPB administration group showed superior BMD preservation [β-coefficient (95% CI): 0.038 (0.001-0.076); P = 0.042]. CBPB administration may be associated with BMD maintenance.

Vitamin D Deficiency in Patients With Low-Energy Hip Fractures in Accordance With the Mediterranean Paradox.

Introduction Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is considered one of the leading causes of poor bone quality. It may also be related to severe muscular weakness, especially in the elderly, which leads to frequent falls. Thus, VDD might be associated with fragility fractures of the hip, wrist, and spine in this age category.In this cross-sectional study, our goal was to present vitamin D levels in an elderly Mediterranean population with hip fractures and to assess whether its levels are related to the incidence or prevention of such injuries. Methods Between January and December 2021, 140 patients aged 65 years or older were hospitalized in our department with a fracture involving the hip joint. Serum calcium and vitamin D level control was performed upon admission, as well as recording whether anti-osteoporosis medication had been prescribed. Only patients with low-energy fractures were included, whereas oncologic patients and those with high-energy trauma were excluded. Results Thirty-eight men and 102 women, with a mean age of 83.12 and 84.88 years, respectively, participated in our study. Intertrochanteric fractures were the most common injuries (50.72%). Low vitamin D levels (<30 ng/mL) were observed in 132 patients (94.28%). A bone density scan during the last year had been conducted by only seven patients (5%), whereas in 136patients (97.14%), no anti-osteoporotic medication was given. Conclusion There is an excessive percentage of aged patients with hip fractures in Greece, demonstrating a significant vitamin D insufficiency despite the high annual frequency of sunny days in this Mediterranean region. Presumably, most of these patients neither perform the routine bone density scan nor do they take any kind of preventive pharmaceutical treatment, which might reveal devaluation of osteoporosis from this age group due to contingent comorbidities.

Bone mineral density T-scores comparison between obese and non-obese individuals included in a Fracture Liaison Service following a recent fragility fracture.

This study aimed to compare the mean T-scores of obese and non-obese patients after recent fragility fractures. Over a period of 5 and a half years, from January 2016 to May 2021, patients from a fracture liaison service were identified and their demographic characteristics, osteoporosis risk factors, BMD T-scores, and fracture sites were compared between obese (BMI ≥ 30kg/m2) and non-obese (19kg/m2 < BMI < 30kg/m2) patients. A total of 712 patients were included (80.1% women; mean age 73.8 ± 11.3years). Sixteen % had type 2 diabetes mellitus and 80% had a major osteoporotic fracture (MOF). 135 patients were obese and 577 non-obese, with obese patients younger (p < 0.001) and more frequently female (p = 0.03). Obese patients presented with fewer hip fractures (10% vs. 21%, p = 0.003) and more proximal humerus fractures (16% vs. 7%, p < 0.001) than non-obese patients. After adjusting for age, sex, and diabetes mellitus, BMD T-score values were significantly higher at all measurement sites (lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck) in obese patients than in non-obese patients for all types of fractures, with a mean difference of 1 standard deviation (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The same results were observed in the population limited to MOF. Given the crucial role of BMD T-score in determining the need for anti-osteoporotic medication following fragility fractures, it is reasonable to question the existing T-score thresholds in obese patients.

Influence of age on the efficacy of pharmacologic treatments on fracture risk reduction and increases in BMD: RCT results from the FNIH-ASBMR-SABRE project.

There is a common belief that antiosteoporosis medications are less effective in older adults. This study used data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine whether the anti-fracture efficacy of treatments and their effects on BMD differ in people ≥70 compared to those <70yr. We used individual patient data from 23 RCTs of osteoporosis medications collected as part of the FNIH-ASBMR SABRE project. We assessed the following fractures: radiographic vertebral, non-vertebral, hip, all clinical, and all fractures. We used Cox proportional hazard regression to estimate treatment effect for clinical fracture outcomes, logistic regression for the radiographic vertebral fracture outcome, and linear regression to estimate treatment effect on 24-mo change in hip and spine BMD in each age subgroup. The analysis included 123 164 (99% female) participants; 43% being ≥70yr. Treatment with anti-osteoporosis drugs significantly and similarly reduced fractures in both subgroups (eg, odds ratio [OR] = 0.47 and 0.51 for vertebral fractures in those below and above 70yr, interaction P = .19; hazard ratio [HR] for all fractures: 0.72 vs 0.70, interaction P = .20). Results were similar when limited to bisphosphonate trials with the exception of hip fracture risk reduction which was somewhat greater in those <70 (HR = 0.44) vs ≥70 (HR = 0.79) yr (interaction P = .02). Allocation to anti-osteoporotic drugs resulted in significantly greater increases in hip and spine BMD at 24mo in those ≥70 compared to those <70yr. In summary, anti-osteoporotic medications similarly reduced the risk of fractures regardless of age, and the few small differences in fracture risk reduction by age were of uncertain clinical significance.

The Efficiency of Antiosteoporosis Medicine after Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Study of Refracture Rate, Function Recovery, Complications, and Mortality in the Chinese Elderly Population

Abstract Objective This research aimed to discern the effects of antiosteoporosis medication on postoperative functional recovery, refracture incidence, complications, and mortality in geriatric patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 250 patients aged 65 years and above who underwent surgery for intertrochanteric fractures between January 2013 and December 2014. Intertrochanteric fracture is diagnosed with International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision code (S72.101) and classified by the Evans–Jensen system. Collected data encompassed demographic details, pre- and postoperative histories of antiosteoporotic medication, functional outcomes (measured using Harris hip score, Parker Mobility Score, and EuroQol-5 Dimension [EQ-5D] scores), refracture incidences, complications, and survival rates. The antiosteoporotic regimen was categorized into essential (calcium, vitamin D) and advanced medications (bisphosphonate, calcitonin, etc.). Outcomes between patients on antiosteoporosis treatment (AO group) and those without (control group) were compared. Results The cohort comprised 250 patients, with a gender distribution of 85 males (34%) and 165 females (66%), and a mean age of 79.8 ± 7.0 years. The median follow-up period was 15.82 months (maximum 31.13 months). Postoperatively, 126 (50.4%) patients were administered antiosteoporotic treatment. The refracture incidence in the AO group (2.4%, n = 3) was notably lower than the control group (8.9%, n = 11), manifesting a substantial risk reduction (odds ratio 0.251, 95% confidence interval 0.068–0.920, p = 0.024). While no marked differences in functional outcomes between the AO and control groups were observed (Harris score [96.17 ± 7.77 vs. 97.29 ± 6.74, p = 0.074), Parker score [8.54 ± 1.26 vs. 8.62 ± 1.18, p = 0.411], EQ-5D [0.83 ± 0.05 vs. 0.82 ± 0.06, p = 0.186]), patients administered a combination of essential and advanced drugs showcased significantly improved Harris and EQ-5D scores compared to those on essential drugs alone (Harris score [77.93 ± 2.04 vs. 84.94 ± 2.73, p = 0.015], EQ-5D [0.65 ± 0.03 vs. 0.75 ± 0.04, p = 0.015]). Conclusion Postoperative antiosteoporosis treatment acts as a deterrent against refracture following intertrochanteric fracture surgeries, evidenced by a decline in refracture rates. However, the treatment's impact on functional recovery, quality of life, complications, and mortality remains indistinct. Interestingly, the combined administration of essential and advanced antiosteoporotic drugs seems to foster enhanced functional outcomes, warranting further exploration in future studies.

Role of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Geriatric Hip Fractures – A Comparative Analysis

Abstract Background: Osteoporotic hip fractures are on the raise in the world. Denosumab and zoledronic acid are among the commonly used current anti-osteoporotic medications to reduce hip fractures. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness and adverse events of denosumab and zoledronic acid in geriatric patients after a hip fracture. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted between February 2020 and May 2021, and a total of 104 patients were included in the study. Fifty-three patients were given subcutaneous (SC) denosumab once in 6 months, and 51 patients were given intravenous (IV) zoledronic acid. The percentage changes in the Bone Mineral Density (BMD) values from the baseline values were compared between both the groups at 0, 12, and 24 months. Results: The percentage increase in lumbar-bone mineral density (L-BMD) was higher significantly in the denosumab group when compared to the zoledronic acid group at 12 months (6.8 ± 0.9 vs. 4.5 ± 0.7; P &lt; 0.01) and 24 months (9.2 ± 0.9 vs. 7.1 ± 0.8; P &lt; 0.001). There was a significant percentage change in the hip-bone mineral density (BMD) in both the groups; however, a higher mean percentage change was noted in the denosumab group when compared to the zoledronic acid group at 12 months and 24 months (P &lt; 0.04 and P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: We conclude that SC-given denosumab has got a better efficacy on comparison with the IV-given zoledronic acid. Randomized control trials with a large sample size and longer follow-up are required to come to conclusion regarding patient safety, compliance, and persistence.

Demographic, functional and clinical characteristics in hip fracture patients according to mental status of the Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry

ObjectiveTo describe the differences according to mental status at admission on the care process and 30-day outcomes in hip fracture patients, mainly regarding the use of rehabilitation resources and anti-osteoporotic medication, by analysing data from the Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC, “Registro Nacional de Fracturas de Cadera” in Spanish). MethodsWe analysed prospectively collected data from a cohort of patients admitted participating in the Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC) in 76 Spanish hospitals between 2017 and 2019. We classified participants using Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ), defining two groups: patients with ≤2 SPMSQ score and patients with >2 SPMSQ score. ResultsOf 21,254 patients was recorded SPMSQ in 17,242 patients, 9052 were >2 SPMSQ score (52.6%). These were older (87.7 vs. 85.3 years; p<0.001), had worse mobility (no-independent walking ability 26.0% vs. 4.5%; p<0.001) and were more likely to be living in nursing homes (35.3% vs. 9.6%; p<0.001). They were more likely to be treated nonoperatively (3.8% vs. 1.5%; p>0.001), less early mobilisation (57.5% vs. 68.9%; p<0.001) and suffered higher in-hospital mortality (5.2% vs. 2.7%; p<0.001). At discharge, they received less anti-osteoporotic medication (37.9% vs. 48.9%; p<0.001) and returned home less often (29.8%% vs. 51.2%; p<0.001). One month after fracture, patients with >2 SPMSQ score had poorer mobility (no-independent walking ability 44.4% vs. 24.9%; p<0.001) and were newly institutionalised in a nursing home more (12.6% vs. 12.0%; p<0.001) and were more likely to die by one-month post-fracture (9.5% vs. 4.6%; p<0.001). ConclusionRNFC patients with >2 SPMSQ score were more vulnerable and had poorer outcomes than patients with ≤2 SPMSQ score, suggesting that they need specialised care in-hospital and in the recovery phase.

Domestic fall – related multiple osteoporotic vertebral fractures: considerations amid late COVID-19 pandemic (a case on point)

Our purpose was to introduce a case on point of a menopausal woman who suffered a domestic fall with consecutive persistent back pain and reduced mobility, and delayed the presentation amid late COVID-19 pandemic. On admission, she was confirmed with osteoporosis according to DXA (lowest T-score of -5.5) and started zoledronate. She refused further orthopedic intervention and remained on non-invasive long term rehabilitation plan while surveillance of anti-osteoporotic medication was offered to her. Fragility vertebral fractures represent increasingly common issues that require prompt intervention to overall a better prognosis. Late presentation and a first diagnosis of 10 vertebral fractures is a part of real life medicine with consequences amid potential lack of compliance to medication and adherence to a rehabilitation plan with short term and long term effects. Transition to post-pandemic reality still represents a concurrent pitfall to delayed hospitalization.