Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions Research Articles

An in-depth analysis of antimicrobial prescription quality in 10 non-university hospitals, in southwest Germany, 2021.

BackgroundNon-university hospitals are the major provider of inpatient care in Germany, serving 89% of acute care hospital beds. Although surveillance data on antimicrobial use in hospitals are widely available, data on prescription quality are rare.AimWe aimed to provide an in-depth analysis of antimicrobial prescribing patterns and quality in southwest German non-university hospitals.MethodsDuring 2021, we performed three point prevalence surveys (PPS) in 10 non-university hospitals, representing ca 10% of hospital beds in the federal state of Baden-Württemberg (11 million inhabitants). Demographic and clinical information were collected. We assessed the overall performance of 14 validated process quality indicators (QI) covering infection diagnostics, antimicrobial therapy and documentation.ResultsOf 8,560 patients analysed, 2,861 (33%) received at least one antimicrobial. Most (2,789, 80%) antimicrobial prescriptions were for therapeutic indications. Most frequently prescribed agents were beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (1,120, 40%) in therapeutic and cefuroxime (269, 37%) in prophylactic indications. According to the World Health Organization's Access, Watch, Reserve classification, the Access-to-Watch ratio was 0.73. Overall adherence to QIs was low and varied substantially (27-93%), with documentation, possible streamlining and switching to oral therapy exhibiting the lowest fulfilment rates (<50%).ConclusionThe results indicate a need to improve antimicrobial prescribing quality in non-university hospitals. The high prevalence of antimicrobial use in our setting underlines the demand for sustainable antimicrobial stewardship programmes in this sector. Our QI-based PPS approach can be used to identify key targets for future antimicrobial stewardship interventions. The results indicate a need for further legislation on antimicrobial stewardship.

Threshold Modeling for Antibiotic Stewardship in Oman.

Antimicrobial stewardship supports rational antibiotic use. However, balancing access to antibiotic treatment while controlling resistance is challenging. This research used a threshold logistic modelling approach to identify targets for antibiotic usage associated with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAb), carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia (CRKP), and extended-spectrum β-lactamases- producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-producing E. coli) incidence in hospitals. This study utilises an ecological population-level design. Monthly pathogen cases and antibiotic use were retrospectively determined for inpatients between January 2015 and December 2023. The hospital pharmacy and microbiology information systems were used to obtain this data. Thresholds were identified by applying nonlinear modelling and logistic regression. Incidence rates of 0.199, 0.175, and 0.146 cases/100 occupied bed-days (OBD) for CRAb, CRKP, and ESBL-producing E. coli, respectively, were determined as the cutoff values for high (critical) incidence rates. Thresholds for aminoglycosides (0.59 defined daily dose (DDD)/100 OBD), carbapenems (6.31 DDD/100 OBD), piperacillin-tazobactam (3.71 DDD/100 OBD), third-generation cephalosporins (3.71 DDD/100 OBD), and fluoroquinolones (1.91 DDD/100 OBD), were identified. Exceeding these thresholds would accelerate the gram-negative pathogens' incidence rate above the critical incidence levels. Employing the threshold logistic approach enabled near real-time performance monitoring feedback, risk scores and alert signals for when the incidence of the selected pathogens are entering critical levels. Threshold logistic models can help inform and implement effective antimicrobial stewardship interventions to manage resistance within hospital settings.

Evaluating pediatric antimicrobial dosing of β-lactam antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections in emergency and primary care settings.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Pediatric prescribing is often weight and indication specific and has been associated with high rates of error. The aim of this study was to evaluate outpatient β-lactam suspension dosing practices for pediatric upper respiratory tract infections (URIs), to characterize the rate of error and to describe common error types. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a community health system with 2 emergency departments and 20 outpatient family medicine practices. Pediatric patients treated from these settings with oral suspension formulations of amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefdinir, or cephalexin for streptococcal pharyngitis or otitis media between June 1, 2020, and May 31, 2023, were eligible for inclusion. Doses were evaluated against indication-specific best-practice guidelines and assessed for guideline concordance. Of the 200 patients evaluated, 100 were treated for streptococcal pharyngitis and 100 were treated for otitis media. Of the prescribed β-lactam doses, 32% were discordant with best-practice guideline recommendations. Dosing errors were more common for pharyngitis than for otitis media (47% vs 17%; P < 0.001). Overdosing was the most frequently observed error in pharyngitis prescriptions (93.6% of errors) and most commonly occurred in patients weighing more than the 20-kg weight associated with the dosing maximum (80.9% of overdosing errors). All patients receiving an inappropriate dose for otitis media were underdosed. Outpatient pediatric dosing errors for URI indications are common among both emergency medicine and family medicine prescribers. Patients weighing over the weight corresponding to the dosing maximum are at highest risk for error. Antimicrobial stewardship interventions targeting the point of prescribing are urgently needed to provide safe dosing practices for pediatric patients.

The feasibility, acceptability and perceived impact of a theory-based intervention on non-medical prescribing students’ antibiotic prescribing behaviour: an experimental study

Abstract Introduction Acute upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) are one of the most common infections. URTIs usually resolve spontaneously but 60% of all prescriptions issued in UK primary care are for URTIs1 contributing to antimicrobial resistance. Non-medical prescribers are a growing group of prescribers but there are few if any antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions to support their prescribing practices. Introducing AMS interventions when learning to prescribe can play an important role to embed appropriate practice at the start of a prescribers’ journey. Aim To test the feasibility, acceptability and perceived impact of a theory-based electronic learning intervention on the antibiotic prescribing behaviour of non-medical prescribing students. Methods Non-medical prescribing students registered at the study setting (university) were recruited via email and word of mouth. Following consent, participants completed an online pre-intervention questionnaire that explored their perceived prescribing behaviour and confidence in treating patients with URTIs. Participants then completed the intervention, accessible from any internet-enabled device via a weblink. The intervention was previously developed2 using the behaviour change wheel and comprised an animation of a prescriber opting against prescribing antibiotics for an adult with self-limiting URTI using a motivational interviewing approach. The patient felt satisfied and confident about their care. Four questions followed the scenario. Participants then completed an online post-intervention questionnaire that explored the usefulness of the intervention, and the same pre-intervention confidence questions. A one-to-one online audio-recorded semi-structured interview followed, exploring participants’ experiences of using the intervention. Questionnaire and interview questions were informed by the Capability Opportunities Motivation-Behaviour model. Questionnaire data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis3. Ethical approval was given by the School Research Ethics Committee where the researchers were based. Results Twelve participants (of 50 approached) consented to take part. Eight completed the pre- and post-intervention questionnaires and the intervention. Seven completed all stages of the study. 87.5% of participants worked in a hospital setting. All were qualified for at least two years. Interviews lasted between 9-15 minutes. Participants’ confidence in treating patients with URTI increased in all statements; gain information on patient expectations, support patients’ comprehension of health information, build rapport, communicate effectively, help patients to see and examine different viewpoints (highest mean increase) and patients understand and are happy with their prescribing decision. These increases aligned with qualitative accounts. Participants agreed that the intervention would be useful to them and would change their practice positively. Participants found the intervention easy to use; access was straightforward and took between 5-20minutes to complete. The addition of a wider range of complex, challenging scenarios to the intervention were suggested. Discussion/conclusions The intervention was feasible to complete and acceptable to the participants. Participants’ confidence in treating patients increased; even though many were familiar with AMS, the intervention gave them further confidence to support a no antibiotic prescribing strategy. Participants suggested including more complex patient scenarios; this will be considered in a future study. Study limitations includes a small sample size and most participants worked in hospital settings but the intervention was set in primary care.

Antibiotic prescribing in health and justice settings (HJS)-surveillance and opportunities for quality improvement

Abstract Introduction Improving surveillance of antibiotic prescribing and reducing health inequalities in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are priorities in the new 5 year AMR national action plan (2024-2029)1. People in contact with the justice system are one of the inclusion groups in the CORE20plus5, a national NHE England approach to support reduction of health inequalities.2 Aim This project aimed to collate and analyse all antibiotic prescribing data from English prisons in order to identify opportunities for quality improvement. Method This project analysed antibiotic prescribing data from September 2022 to current date for the first time in HJS from the IT system used in all prisons in England. No ethical approval is required as surveillance is of anonymised data only. Data was broken down by age band (18 and under, 19-49, 50 and over), category of prison, region, ICB, individual prison and antibiotic type. The dashboard allows benchmarking across sites and comparison with primary care, as prisoners in HJS are considered to have similar infections to primary care patients. Results The majority of prescribing is in male prisoners, reflecting the male/female population split. The most frequently prescribed antibiotics are those used for: skin and soft tissue (including acne), respiratory tract, dental and urinary tract infections. A number of focus areas for quality improvement have been identified, including: Broad spectrum antibiotics (Cephalosporins, Co-amoxiclav and Quinolones), target of &amp;lt;10% total antibiotic prescribing in primary care, in HJS, currently 11%. Appropriate quinolone prescribing is a target in all settings due to recent MHRA alert3. Acne prescribing represents a significant proportion of antibiotic prescribing in HJS. Lymecycline 12%, whereas in primary care &amp;lt;3%. Duration of Antibiotic Courses: In primary care there is a medicines optimisation opportunity ambition to achieve 75% prescribing amoxicillin 500mg as 5 day duration. In HJS only 27% is for 5 days. When prescribing 100mg doxycycline for respiratory infections, NICE guidance recommends a 5 day course, but in HJS only 3% is prescribed as a 5 day course. For UTI in female prisons, nitrofurantoin 100mg MR is most commonly prescribed, NICE guidance for UTI in women is for 3 days; 47% in HJS are for 3 days, but 35% are 7 day courses. Discussion and Conclusion This dashboard provides insight into antibiotic prescribing data allowing opportunities for quality improvement opportunities to be identified and antimicrobial stewardship interventions to be evaluated. This work will progress to tackle the focus areas identified. Next steps are to work with antibiotic champions from HJS to co-produce intervention plans, share patient safety messages, trial available resources, rollout interventions and monitor impact via the dashboard. Limitations Indications are not available from the data but extrapolated from the antibiotic prescribed. The dashboard is currently an excel spreadsheet in NHSE. It will be moved to a platform that enables access by individual prisons.

Exploring the real-world management of catheter-associated urinary tract infections by Swiss general practitioners and urologists: insights from an online survey.

To assess and compare the real-world management of catheters and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) among Swiss general practitioners and urologists, encompassing diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis. An anonymised online questionnaire was distributed among Swiss general practitioners and urologists between January and October 2023 via the networks of Sentinella and the Swiss Association of Urology. The questionnaire consisted of questions on catheter management, including diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of CAUTI. Analysis was performed by discipline. Fisher's exact test was applied for comparisons (statistical significance with p <0.05). Out of 175 participating physicians, the majority were involved in catheter management. Urologists exhibited significantly higher levels of competence as compared to general practitioners (67.1% vs 20.9%). Although no significant differences were observed regarding diagnostic approaches between disciplines, unrecommended diagnostic methods were frequently applied. general practitioners reported that they treated non-febrile CAUTI for longer durations, while urologists indicated that they treated febrile CAUTI longer. Additionally, the use of fluoroquinolones was more prevalent among general practitioners compared to urologists, while prophylactic measures were more frequently applied by urologists. Catheter and CAUTI management entail significant uncertainty for general practitioners. CAUTI management varied notably between general practitioners and urologists in terms of treatment and prophylaxis. The use of non-recommended diagnostic approaches and drugs was common. This trend, along with inappropriate diagnostic methods and prophylaxis, may increase antimicrobial resistance and CAUTI morbidity. The study emphasises the necessity for diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship interventions, and proper training in CAUTI management for general practitioners and urologists.

Capturing the complexity of veterinarians' antibiotic prescribing practices in the livestock sector: a meta-ethnography across contexts: Veterinarians' antibiotic prescribing in different contexts.

Strategies and policies to tackle the global public health threat of antimicrobial resistance are increasingly addressing antimicrobial use prescribing practices in both the human and animal health sectors. Veterinarians' antibiotic prescribing practices are influenced by different factors and conditioned by the context within which antibiotic prescribing decisions are made, complexifying the implementation of behaviour change interventions. A better understanding of these factors could therefore help in the design and application of such interventions. Meta-ethnography was used to explore the antibiotic prescribing behaviour of veterinarians in different contexts and to construct a new conceptual framework. A search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection and SciELO Citation Index between 2016 and 2024. The final sample consisted of 29 articles, 27 of which were selected from the 561 articles identified in the search and 2 of which were added by the authors. The results were synthesized and presented through four contextual situations influencing antibiotic prescribing by livestock veterinarians: priorities and pressures, uncertain field conditions, systemic challenges and an enabling environment. The results are presented as a conceptual framework that views veterinarians' antibiotic prescribing behaviour as dynamic, adapting in response to the different contextual situations they encounter. The findings provide an integrated and contextualized understanding of veterinarians' antibiotic prescribing behaviours, which could be implemented to facilitate the development and application of future antimicrobial stewardship interventions.

Implementation of a Nurse-Initiated Antibiotic Time-Out (NATO) in Childhood Cancer Patients in Central America

Abstract Background Children with cancer are at high risk for infection and frequently require antimicrobials. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions can mitigate toxicity and development of antibiotic resistance yet the pharmacy and infectious diseases specialists who usually perform AMS are often absent in global settings. We report our experience testing a novel intervention to shift the antibiotic timeout to nurses in six pediatric oncology units in Central America. Methods The Nurse-initiated Antibiotic Timeout (NATO) is a scripted conversation between nurses and physicians to reevaluate antibiotic appropriateness after 48 to 72 hours of empiric use for febrile neutropenia. First, we performed a baseline assessment of AMS capacity using the WHO Practical Toolkit for AMS Programmes checklist. Based on these results, sites tailored a generic implementation plan emphasizing educational and documentation tools and iterative PDSA (Plan-Do, Study-Act) cycles to improve implementation and effectiveness outcomes. Results All sites collected antimicrobial use data for a minimum of two months. Four sites then piloted NATO, producing change ideas, including changes to documentation tools, antimicrobial decision categories, communication processes, and times. From August 2022 – October 2023, NATO was performed in 53.4% of febrile neutropenia episodes in the three sites reporting data. Sites had substantial NATO performance rate variation from month to month. Sites reported changes in antimicrobial therapy in 47% of episodes after a 6-month period (Figure 1). Conclusion The difference in performance rate of NATO underscores the importance of real-time reporting to adjust AMS implementation strategies. The change ideas developed by each site differed, however, core tools emerged, which will support AMS in other global settings. Next steps include comparing antimicrobial use pre- and post-intervention and determining a sustainability and scalability plan. Figure 1. Incidence of change in antibiotic therapy over time.

Sustainment of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in children following discontinuation of an educational intervention to support stewardship.

Adherence to perioperative antimicrobial guidelines among Greek children was markedly decreased years after the discontinuation of an antimicrobial stewardship (AS) intervention. An educational intervention is effective to improve the perioperative antimicrobial use, but the continuous implementation of AS is important for its long-term sustainability.

Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing among patients treated for dental diseases in Mekelle city, Northern Ethiopia: a cross sectional study

BackgroundLocal operative treatments are generally preferred for most dental diseases, with antibiotics only recommended as an adjunct in specific cases. Misuse and overuse of antibiotics has been shown to significantly contribute to the development of resistant bacteria. However, the antibiotic prescribing practices of dentists in Ethiopia have not been thoroughly studied. This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing for patients with dental diseases at dental clinics in Mekelle City, Northern Ethiopia.MethodsA cross sectional study was conducted in April and May 2020 among patients visiting dental clinics in Mekelle City. Data were collected through patient medical record reviews and dentist interviews. The appropriateness of antibiotic prescription was evaluated based on guidelines from the American Dental Association and the European Society of Endodontology. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics, version 29. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed, and the results were presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsTwo hundred and thirty-one patients with dental diseases participated in the study. The mean age was 30.6 years with a standard deviation of 16.1. Most participants had dental pulp related disease. 89% of patients were prescribed antibiotics, with amoxicillin being the most common. Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing was identified in 175 (75.8%) of the study participants. The most common inappropriate prescribing was unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for dental conditions without systemic signs, assessed in 141 (80.1%) participants. Patients diagnosed with pulp related disease without systemic signs and those who had tooth extractions were significantly associated with inappropriate antibiotic prescription (p value < 0.001).ConclusionsThe study findings show that antibiotics are over-prescribed for dental conditions in this resource constrained setting, especially in patients who have had tooth extractions. Dentists need training on appropriate antibiotic use and antimicrobial stewardship interventions should be implemented in dental setting to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions and prevent antibiotic resistance development.

Validation of short culture method for rapid bacterial identification of blood cultures via matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Development of rapid bacterial identification from blood cultures has been an area of intense study in diagnostic microbiology. Shortened turnaround time coupled with antimicrobial stewardship interventions have been shown to improve patient outcomes and decrease healthcare-associated costs. We report the validation of a short incubation method for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial identification utilizing MALDI-TOF MS without additional instrumentation, processing or cost compared with current practice. Prospective, observational, single-centre study in a quaternary care academic hospital encompassing 376 blood cultures subjected to bacterial identification after short incubation periods of 3-4 and 6-8 h. There was 97.5% species-level identification agreement with tests undertaken after 3-4 h incubation with 83.6% isolates identified, and 99.7% species-level identification agreement after 6-8 h incubation with 96.7% isolates identified. The short incubation method provides a rapid MALDI-TOF MS bacterial identification method, reducing turnaround time by 10-18 h compared with standard practice without additional cost, processing or instrumentation.

“Antimicrobial utilization in a paediatric intensive care unit in India: A step towards strengthening antimicrobial stewardship practices"

Antimicrobials are frequently used in critically ill children admitted to the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). The antimicrobial use data from Indian PICUs is limited using standard metrics such as Days of therapy (DOT). This study aimed to determine the baseline trend of antimicrobial use in PICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital of Raipur district of Chhattisgarh, India using standard metrics with the goal of developing facility-wide antibiotic policy and strengthening the antimicrobial stewardship activities. This active surveillance was conducted over a period of 18 months, from November 1, 2019, to March 21, 2021, in patients aged one month to 14 years who were admitted for ≥ 48 hours to the PICU at a tertiary care teaching hospital of Raipur District. Data on patient characteristics, antimicrobial indications, antimicrobial prescription information, and clinical outcomes were collected using pre-designed data abstraction forms. The descriptive statistic was used to represent the results. The antimicrobial consumption was analyzed according to the WHO AWaRe Class (Access, Watch, and Reserve groups) of antibiotics. The antimicrobial consumption was expressed as DOT/1000 patient-days (PD). A total of 216 patients were surveyed during the study period. The average number of antimicrobials prescribed per hospitalisation was 2.60 (range: 1–12), with 97.22% administered via parenteral route. Overall, DOT/1000-PD was 1318. The consumption of Watch Group antimicrobials was highest with 949 DOT/1000-PD, followed by Access (215) and Reserve Group (154), respectively. Ceftriaxone (208 DOT/1000 PD) was the most commonly prescribed antimicrobial agent, followed by Vancomycin (201), Meropenem (175), Piperacillin-Tazobactam (122) and Colistin (91). The patients who were escalated (28.24%) from empirical antimicrobial therapy had longer median PICU stay (8 days) compared those who were de-escalated (23.6%). Targeted therapy was given in 10.2% patients. The overall mortality rate was 14.35% and was higher (29.3%) in patients in whom empirical therapy was escalated compared to those who were de-escalated or continued. The study established a benchmark for antimicrobials use in the PICU and highlighted priority areas for antimicrobial stewardship intervention to enhance de-escalation rates, enhance targeted therapy, and reduce the overuse of antimicrobials especially belonging to the reserve group.

The imperative of teamwork in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions: insights from an ethnographic study with practitioners in Spain.

Teamwork-the activity of working together in a group towards a similar goal-is a defining feature of the practice of clinical medicine carried out in hospitals and other healthcare facilities. This Viewpoint suggests that teamwork is a defining feature of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes, and identifies six elements that characterise AMS team dynamics. These insights arise from an original ethnographic study of AMS carried out in Spain, where these programmes are known as Programas para la Optimización de Antimicrobianos. The study used qualitative research methods including ethnographic observations in public hospitals and scientific and educational fora, in-depth interviews and archival research. It calls for a reflection on the part of the global community of AMS practitioners on the role of team dynamics in building sustainable AMS interventions and the inclusion of teamwork skills in training curricula aimed at future practitioners.

Combination of a Rapid Diagnostic Assay and Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention for Gram-Negative Bacteremia.

Traditional blood cultures for gram-negative bacteremia can take up to 72 hours or more to return results, prolonging the duration of empiric broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics. The Accelerate Pheno system provides rapid identification and susceptibilities for blood cultures in gram-negative bacteremia. Current data on its clinical utility are mixed overall, so the system requires further research. A multicenter, retrospective quasi-experimental study was conducted comparing the Accelerate Pheno rapid diagnostic system with antimicrobial stewardship intervention and traditional blood cultures alone. A total of 264 patients with blood cultures with gram-negative bacteria growth were included in the final analysis (102 pre-intervention, 162 post-intervention). The antimicrobial stewardship team made 364 recommendations in 152/162 (93.8%) patients in the post group. Duration of intravenous therapy was shorter (P < .001) for the post-intervention group (median, 4.0 days) compared with the pre-intervention group (median, 7.5 days). Hospital length of stay was also shorter (P < .001) for the post-intervention group (median, 5.1 days) compared with the pre-intervention group (median, 7.0 days). Readmission rates within 30 days were reduced (P = .042) post-intervention (13.0%) compared with pre-intervention (22.6%). In the post-intervention group, a larger proportion of patients were transitioned to oral therapy at any point (126/162, 77.8%) compared with pre-intervention (62/102, 60.8%; P < .001). These results suggest that the Accelerate Pheno system, with active review and intervention by a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team, is a useful tool in improving both patient-centric and antimicrobial stewardship outcomes.

Identifying interventions that improve medication safety & rational use of medicines in India.

Background & objectives Medication-related harm is known to be the cause for about 1/10th of hospitalizations. Some estimates from India show that about 90 per cent of medicines consumed are inessential or irrational and contribute towards high out-of-pocket expenditure on health. In this context, the Indian Council of Medical Research in 2022 constituted a National Task Force (NTF) to explore possible solutions that could improve safe and rational use of medicines (SRUMs). The objective of this study was to identify research ideas in the field of SRUM through a survey of relevant stakeholders, and further to prioritize the research ideas using a pre-identified set of criteria. Methods The responses from the identified stakeholders were assessed using the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative method, which is an established research priority-setting methodology. First, the NTF asked for two to six research ideas from relevant Indian and global stakeholders on solutions to improve SRUM. The ideas were checked for duplicates, re-phrased where necessary and classified into various sub-themes. Subsequently, the research ideas were scored by Indian experts with relevant technical expertise using a pre-defined set of five criteria: innovativeness, effectiveness, translational value, answerability and applicability. Each research idea received from a stakeholder was assigned a score under each of the five criteria. The overall research priority score was calculated as a mean of all five criteria-specific scores and converted into a percentage. Results The final output of the prioritization process was a list of research ideas or questions, ranked by their scores. Total 209 unique ideas were received from 190 respondents, which were scored by 27 experts. The top three research topics on medication safety focused on cost-effective strategies for improving antimicrobial stewardship, safe use of poly-pharmacy in geriatric patients and drug take-back policy interventions. Regarding the rational use of medicine, the top three topics included testing mobile application-based antimicrobial stewardship interventions, development of diagnostics for antimicrobial resistance, and behavioural interventions. Interpretation & conclusions Several priority ideas found in this study also align with those of global priority, e.g., safe disposal practices and enhanced pharmacovigilance, rational use of medicines. Patient engagement, which underlines many of the top scoring ideas found in this study, is also inclined with the top research priorities reported by the WHO priority exercise on research into the safe use of medicines. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first such work from a low- and middle- income country on medication safety and rational use of medicines. The findings of this research priority-setting exercise can help to guide research for the development of policy-relevant and novel interventions to improve SRUM in India.

Improving Antibiotic Stewardship in a Pediatric Long-term Care Facility.

Antimicrobial stewardship is little studied in pediatric long-term care facilities. We sought to determine whether empirical ciprofloxacin for febrile respiratory illnesses could be safely reduced in our pediatric long-term care facility. All patients living in the 45-bed facility were included. A 1-year educational intervention for antimicrobial stewardship was implemented. Days of ciprofloxacin therapy, infections, microbiology, hospitalizations, other antibiotic use, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridioides difficile infections, and mortality were recorded at regular intervals retrospectively from 5 years before intervention and prospectively for 8 years after intervention. Data were analyzed using statistical process control charts. A majority of patients had tracheostomy tubes (96%) and ventilator dependence (58%). Ciprofloxacin use declined by 76% (17 to 4 days/1000 facility patient days). Antibiotic prescriptions for bacterial tracheitis decreased by 89% (38 to 4 courses per 6-month period). No increases in positive blood or urine cultures, hospitalizations, or need for hospital antibiotics were observed. An antimicrobial stewardship intervention in a pediatric long-term care facility led to decreases in ciprofloxacin use, bacterial tracheitis diagnoses, and overall antibiotic use without increasing negative outcomes.

Impact of pharmacist-driven antimicrobial stewardship interventions in a secondary care facility in Japan: A pragmatic quasi-experimental study

BackgroundEfforts to promote antimicrobial stewardship aimed at reducing antimicrobial resistance are necessary regardless of hospital scale owing to delays in new antimicrobial development. We aimed to evaluate the effects of pharmacist-driven interventions on broad-spectrum antimicrobial usage and the prognosis of patients with bacteremia in a medium-sized hospital lacking infectious disease physicians and a microbiology laboratory. MethodsThis single-center, retrospective, pragmatic, quasi-experimental study was conducted to compare pre- and post-intervention effects at Saiseikai Futsukaichi Hospital. We analyzed the days of therapy (DOT) for carbapenems and days of antibiotic spectrum coverage (DASC) for antimicrobials using an interrupted time series analysis. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to assess 30-day mortality using propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting in patients with bacteremia. ResultsPharmacist-driven interventions significantly reduced the DOT (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.53, 95 % confidence intervals [CI]: 0.33−0.81, p = 0.003) and DASC (IRR: 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.78−0.97, p = 0.016). The 30-day mortality due to bacteremia did not significantly differ between pre- and post-intervention in all patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.92, 95 % CI: 0.56−1.51, p = 0.74). Conversely, pharmacist-driven interventions significantly reduced the 30-day mortality owing to bacteremia with Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) ≥4 (adjusted HR: 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.28−0.99, p = 0.047). ConclusionsPharmacist-driven interventions may represent a valuable approach for optimizing antimicrobial treatment and improving prognosis, especially in patients with PBS ≥4, which will potentially benefit patients in similar healthcare environments facing challenges related to antimicrobial stewardship and patient prognosis.

P02 Evaluating the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions in a UK paediatric emergency department

P02 Evaluating the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions in a UK paediatric emergency department

Power Relations in Optimisation of Therapies and Equity in Access to Antibiotics (PROTEA) Study: investigating the intersection of socio-economic and cultural drivers on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and its influence on healthcare access and health-providing behaviours in India and South Africa.

Across social structures within society, including healthcare, power relations manifest according to gender, socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, and class influencing infection related healthcare access and health providing-behaviours. Therefore, accounting for sociocultural drivers, including gender, race, and class, and their influence on economic status can improve healthcare access and health-providing behaviours in infection prevention and control (IPC) as well as antibiotic use, which in turn helps mitigate the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This Wellcome funded research will investigate how and why the social determinants of health and economic status influence how people seek, experience, and provide healthcare for suspected or proven (bacterial) infections and how these factors influence antibiotic prescribing and use in South Africa (upper middle-income country) and India (lower middle-income country). The aim of this body of work is to, (1) define and estimate the sociocultural and economic drivers for AMR in different resource settings, (2) design, implement and evaluate context-sensitive IPC and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions, and (3) inform policy and strategy for AMR mitigation. The population will be healthcare workers (HCWs), patients, and their carers across acute medical and surgical pathways where IPC and antibiotic-related healthcare access and health-providing behaviours will be studied. Qualitative methods will include ethnographic research, semi-structured in-depth interviews, and focus groups with healthcare providers, patients and carers. Quantitative analysis of bedside observational data from hospitals and population level data on antibiotic use will study the various predictors of AMR using bivariable and multivariable regression analyses. The research will provide high-quality evidence on how social determinants intersect with health, social well-being, and vulnerability in IPC practices and antibiotic use. Using this knowledge we will: 1) design, implement, and measure effects of interventions accounting for these factors; 2) provide a toolkit for advocacy for actors in AMR, and healthcare to assist them to promote dialogue, including policy dialogue on this issue. This work directly benefits the target population and informs healthcare services and practice across the participating countries with potential for wider translation. The setting will be hospitals in South Africa (middle-income country) and India (lower middle-income country). The population will be healthcare workers (HCWs), patients, and their carers across acute medical and surgical pathways where IPC and antibiotic-related health-seeking and health-providing behaviours will be studied. These populations represent communities most affected by infections and AMR because existing interventions do not address a) differences in how surgical versus medical teams manage infections; b) the role of the wider social network of individuals on their decision-making, c) intersection of the social determinants of health including race, gender, socioeconomic deprivation with AMR.

FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel Impact on Antibiotic Usage in Patients with Suspected Community-Acquired Meningitis

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures are commonly performed to evaluate patients with suspected bacterial meningitis. These cultures, however, can take up to 72 hours, leading to delays in antibiotic de-escalation and increased antimicrobial utilization. The turnaround for the BioFire® FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis(FA/ME) panel is less than an hour, which may facilitate early de-escalation. Our study aimed to assess whether the use of FA/ME panels in combination with CSF cultures could impact antimicrobial therapy compared to cultures alone in patients treated for suspected bacterial meningitis. Methods: Our retrospective study included patients from five hospitals in Texas (2017-2023) who received empiric antibiotics for suspected community-acquired meningitis and underwent a lumbar puncture within 96 hours of admission. Patients with ventricular drains, traumatic brain injury, and non-central nervous system infections were excluded. Cases comprised patients who had an FA/ME panel performed, while controls included patients without the panel. Outcomes were defined as the empiric duration of antimicrobial therapy (days) and total days of antibiotic therapy (DOT). Wilcoxon Rank Sum test and multiple linear regression models were applied to assess the relationship between the use of the FA/ME panel and study outcomes. Independent variables comprised demographics, institution type, acuity, clinical presentation, CSF values, and FA/ME panel use. Imputation was performed using multiple imputation by chained equations. Results: A total of 193 patients were included in our study. Seventy-one patients received the FA/ME panel (along with the CSF culture), while 122 patients received the CSF culture alone (controls). The median empiric duration of antibiotic therapy in the cases and controls were 1.71 days and 1.18 days, respectively (p = .160). The median DOT in the cases and controls were eight days and six days, respectively (p = .045). After adjusting for confounders, the FA/ME panel was not significantly associated with changes in the empiric duration of antibiotic therapy (B= 0.18, p = .669, Figure 1) or DOT (B= 1.28, p = .170, Figure 2).Conclusion: Providing FA/ME panel testing without active antimicrobial stewardship interventions did not result in a change in antimicrobial prescribing patterns. The difference from prior literature could be explained by the smaller sample size, limiting the power of the study. Further prospective antimicrobial stewardship efforts should focus on training providers on interpreting FA/ME panel results and providing prospective audits and feedback.