Antihypertensive Medication Regimen Research Articles

Impact of sociodemographic patient factors on prescriber adherence to antihypertensive prescription guidelines: a cross-sectional study using data from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing

Abstract Introduction Uncontrolled hypertension causes significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Several international prescribing guidelines have been created to address this. However, prescriber adherence to these guidelines may be influenced by sociodemographic patient factors such as socio-economic status, gender and age. Aim To examine the effects of gender and other patient factors, including age, geographical location, educational attainment, duration of disease, socio-economic status, smoking status, and previous history of cardiovascular diseases on prescriber adherence to hypertension prescription guidelines. Achievement of blood pressure goals (<140/90 mmHg) with adherence to prescription guidelines was also assessed. Methods This study is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the first wave (2009-2011) of The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA), which included 8,175 Irish adults ≥50 years of age. Participants were included in the present study if they reported a previous doctor diagnosis of hypertension. Antihypertensive medication regimens were compared and categorised according to the 2011 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)[1] prescription guidelines, which included the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and thiazide diuretics in the treatment of hypertension. In this study, the antihypertensive medication regimens of participants were categorised based on age categories (<55, ≥55, and all age groups), and compared to the 2011 NICE Guidelines which differentiate treatment in those ≥55, and <55 years of age. The effects of patient sociodemographic factors on prescriber adherence to the guidelines, and the effects of guideline adherence on blood pressure control, (defined as blood pressure<140/90 mmHg), were determined using multinomial logistic regression models. The mlogit, RRR code in STATA 17 SE was used to report relative risks (RRs). Results A total of 2,992 participants were included, of whom 54.9% were women. The mean age of participants was 65.69 years (±9.23). Male gender, older age and lower socioeconomic status among participants were associated with increased prescriber guideline adherence. Prescribers were less likely to adhere to guidelines in female patients ≥55 years (RR 0.75 [0.62 to 0.91]), and female patients across all age groups (RR 0.80 [0.67 to 0.95]). Better blood pressure control was seen with medication regimens adherent to prescription guidelines with a mean of 140.38 (±18.98)/83.09 (±11.02) mmHg compared to a mean of 141.66 (±19.86)/84.77 (±11.71) mmHg in those non-adherent to guidelines. Conclusion This study highlights the effects of patient gender on prescriber adherence to antihypertensive prescription guidelines. A study strength is the use of a large, nationally representative cohort that used a standardised protocol of data collection within the Irish population. A potential limitation is the inclusion of self-reported data, including doctor diagnosis of hypertension. The results of this study may emphasise a larger issue of the systemic undertreatment of women within healthcare; however, these results should be interpreted in the context of 2011 guidelines, which have since been superseded by 2019 NICE guidelines. Further research may seek to determine possible reasons for such differences in hypertensive care. Reference 1. Linden B. NICE guidance on primary hypertension National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2011) Hypertension: Clinical Management of Primary Hypertension in Adults. NICE Clinical Guideline 127. British journal of cardiac nursing. 2011;6:582-584.

Arabic translation and cultural adaptation of Hill-Bone compliance to high blood pressure therapy scale

BackgroundAdherence to prescription medications is vital to the success of any treatment plan, especially for chronic health conditions, such as hypertension (HTN). Although there are different scales used in assessing adherence to prescription medications, most if not all, of those scales are not available in Arabic. The absence of essential assessment tools makes the appraisal of adherence to prescription medications very difficult for native Arabic speakers. Therefore, this study aimed to translate and validate the Hill-Bone Compliance to High Blood Pressure Therapy (CHBPT) scale, which is commonly used to assess adherence to antihypertensive medications, among a sample of Arabic-speaking patients with HTN. MethodsThis was a single-center cross-sectional study that took place at a university-affiliated hospital. It interviewed adult (≥18 years) patients with HTN who were visiting the primary care clinics between January and November 2020. Non-Arabic speakers, those under 18 years of age, individuals without a diagnosis of HTN, and patients without any previously filled prescription medications for HTN within the past three months were excluded. The forward–backward translation method was used after receiving permission from the originators of the questionnaire to translate their scale to Arabic. Test-retest and Cronbach alpha methods were used to assess the reliability. Principal component analysis with varimax rotation was used to examine the construct validity. ResultsOne hundred and forty-one patients consented and participated in the study. Most of the patients were ≥ 50 years old (75 %), male (72 %), and had another chronic health condition besides HTN (99 %). The translated scale had good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.83) and reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.9). The Kaiser-Meyer-Oklin was 0.82 indicating adequate sampling to conduct factor analysis; hence, three factors (e.g., subscales) were extracted similar to the original scale. The mean scores for appointment keeping, medication taking, and reducing sodium intake subscales, as well as for the overall scale were 5.62 ± 1.39, 33.94 ± 3.87, 9.73 ± 2.1, and 49.29 ± 5.21, respectively. ConclusionThe translated version of the Hill-Bone CHBPT scale has both good reliability and validity and will hopefully help healthcare providers assess and monitor HTN patients’ adherence to their antihypertensive medication regimens. Multicenter studies should be conducted to verify the validity and reliability of the translated questionnaire among different Arabic-speaking patient populations with HTN.

Abstract P318: Provider Barriers and Facilitators to Treatment Intensification for Patients With Uncontrolled Blood Pressure

Background: Hypertension is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease and premature death worldwide, however, therapeutic inertia, failure to intensify pharmacotherapy when blood pressure (BP) is not at goal, is a key obstacle to hypertension control. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to increasing the dose or adding a different antihypertensive medication class for patients with uncontrolled BP. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study of healthcare providers from Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC). Using a stratified purposeful sampling approach, we identified 300 providers across 15 medical centers and specialties and with a mix of treatment intensification rates. In 2 separate waves, we emailed a letter of invitation to 150 eligible providers followed by 2 reminder emails each two weeks apart. We sought to conduct 30 semi-structured interviews about management of patients newly diagnosed with hypertension including use of single-pill combination therapy (SPC) (the recommended first-line therapy within KPSC), barriers to therapeutic intensification and use of home BP monitoring for treatment intensification decision making. We used rapid analysis methods to code responses and develop themes. Results: A total of 11 interviews were completed with providers from family medicine (n=7), internal medicine (n=3) and cardiology (n=1) who had an average of 6 years of practice within KPSC. The majority of providers reported using monotherapy as first-line treatment while SPC therapy was reserved for younger patients and those with baseline systolic BP >160 mm Hg. Monotherapy was often preferred to help providers determine if the first-line medication is causing side effects. Nearly all providers reported maximizing the dose of one medication before adding another medication class. Providers ranked the barriers to intensifying patients’ treatment in order of importance as 1) side effects such as frequent urination, hyperkalemia, and hypotension, 2) nonadherence to the current antihypertensive medication regimen and patient preference/hesitancy, 3) comorbidities (e.g., kidney function), and 4) age-related factors such as memory loss and ability to complete follow-up labs. All providers reported using patients’ home BP readings for treatment decision-making with most recognizing that patients’ out-of-clinic BP may be lower than clinic BP. Conclusion: Providers embraced stepped-care treatment for newly diagnosed patients with hypertension with most preferring monotherapy as first-line treatment. Concerns with side effects, nonadherence to the medication regimen and shared decision-making are key factors in providers’ decisions to intensify therapy for patients with uncontrolled BP. Targeted interventions to address provider barriers to treatment intensification may be needed.

Development of a machine learning-based model for predicting individual responses to antihypertensive treatments

Background and aimsPersonalized antihypertensive drug selection is essential for optimizing hypertension management. The study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict individual blood pressure (BP) responses to different antihypertensive medications. Methods and resultsWe used data from a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial on hypertension management in China. Each patient's multiple visit records were included, and two consecutive visits were paired as the index and subsequent visits. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was used to select index visit variables for predicting subsequent BP. The dataset was randomly divided into training and test sets in a 7:3 ratio. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and R-square in the test set. A total of 19,013 hypertension management visit records (6282 patients) were included. The mean age of the study population was 63.9 years, and 2657 (42.3%) were females. A total of 12 phenotypical features (age, sex, smoking within seven days, body mass index, waist circumference, index visit systolic BP, diastolic BP, heart rate, comorbidities of diabetes, dyslipidemia, coronary heart disease, and stroke), together with currently taking any prescribed antihypertensive medication regimens and visits time interval were selected to build the model. The Extreme Gradient Boost model performed best among all candidate algorithms, with an MAE of 8.57 mmHg and an R2 = 0.28 in the test set. ConclusionThe ML techniques exhibit significant potential for predicting individual responses to antihypertensive treatments, thereby aiding clinicians in achieving optimal BP control safely and efficiently. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03636334. Registered July 3, 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03636334.

Medication Regimens against Hypertension Utilized in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Stud

Context: Standard and intensive Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) interventions would be contextualized by describing the antihypertensive medication regimens used in the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). This information may also help future implementation efforts to meet population-wide intensive SBP goals. Methods: At the rerandomization and 12-month visits, we provided SPRINT participants with comprehensive medication data. The class of antihypertensive medications was used to categorize regimens. The analyses were divided into groups based on the kind of treatment (intensive target SBP <120 mm Hg versus standard goal SBP <140 mm Hg) Findings: The median number of classes used at the rerandomization visit was 2.0 for 7860 individuals (83.7% of 9361 randomized), and 2.0 for the standard and intensive groups (P=0.559). After a year, the intensive and conventional groups used a median of 3.0 and 2.0 classes, respectively (P<0.001). In the intensive and standard groups, the most common regimens were rerandomization, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme inhibitor (ACE), or Angiotensin-II Receptor Blocker (ARB) monotherapy (12.6% versus 12.2%). After a year, 5.3% of participants in the intense group and 14.7% of participants in the normal group still used ACE/ARB monotherapy. The following multidrug regimens were utilized at 12 months by both the intensive and regular participants: a calcium channel blocker and thiazide (12.2% and 7.9%) combined in an ACE/ARB thiazide, and calcium channel blocker (11.4% and 4.3%); an ACE/ARB, thiazide, calcium channel blocker, and beta-blocker (6.5% and 1.2%); and 6.2% and 6.8% of each category. Conclusions: Compared to ACE/ARB monotherapy, SPRINT investigators preferred combining ACEs or ARBs, thiazide diuretics, and calcium channel blockers to aim SBP <120 mm Hg.

Anti-Hypertensive Drugs Special References with Their Classification of Calcium Channel Blocker

Objective: Determine the distribution and longitudinal changes in antihypertensive medication regimens in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Methods: We used antihypertensive medication data collected by pill bottle review at each visit to categorize antihypertensive regimens by medication class. Free text string variables of medication names were independently reviewed by two clinical pharmacists to create standardized generic medication names and classes. Results: Figure 1 illustrates longitudinal changes in class combinations and number of drugs at the randomization, 6, 12, and 18-month visits. Fifty-six percent of participants modified their initial regimen by the 6-month visits; 43% of participants made additional modifications to their regimens from the 6-month to the 18-month visit. The most common initial regimens, and least likely regimens to be changed over time, were combinations with an ACEI/ARB and diuretics ± other classes (42% of initial regimens). Participants in the intensive arm added a mean (standard deviation) of 0.6 (0.9) medications to their initial regimens in the first 18-months compared to -0.1 (0.9) in the standard arm. Conclusion: Intensive blood pressure treatment requires more medication complexity in terms of class and dose. Further study of distinct regimens may reveal if certain class and dose combinations provide better SBP control, safety, or patient satisfaction.

Abstract 13622: Association Between Self-Reported Medication Adherence and Therapeutic Inertia in Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)

Introduction: Therapeutic inertia (TI), the failure to intensify antihypertensive medication when blood pressure (BP) is above goal, remains highly prevalent in hypertension management. The degree to which self-reported antihypertensive adherence is associated with TI when targeting intensive BP goals remains unclear. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of the 12-month visit of participants randomized to the intensive systolic BP (SBP) arm of the SBP Intervention Trial (SPRINT), which randomized adults at high cardiovascular disease risk to an intensive (<120 mm Hg) vs. standard (<140 mm Hg) SBP treatment group. TI was defined as no change in the antihypertensive medication regimen intensity score, which incorporates the medication number and dose, when the SBP >120 mm Hg. Self-reported medication adherence was assessed using the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) and categorized as low (<6), medium (6 to <8), and high (8). Poisson regression models with robust error variance estimated prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for TI associated with MMAS-8 category. Results: Among 1,009 intensive arm participants with SBP >120 mm Hg at the 12-month visit (mean age 69.6 years, 35.2% female, 28.8% non-Hispanic Black), TI occurred in 50.8% of participants. Participants with low self-reported adherence (vs. high) were younger and more likely to be non-Hispanic Black or current smokers. The prevalence of TI among low, medium, and high adherence was 45.0%, 53.5%, and 50.4%, respectively. After adjustment, neither low nor medium adherence (vs. high) were associated with TI (PR 1.11; 95% CI 0.87,1.42, PR 1.08; 95% CI 0.84,1.38, respectively). Conclusion: Although clinician uncertainty about medication adherence is often cited as a reason for why antihypertensive intensification is withheld when the BP is above goal, we observed no evidence of an association between self-reported adherence to antihypertensive medication and TI.

Practical recommendations for antihypertensive therapy during the primary aldosteronism screening test.

The aldosterone-to-renin activity ratio (ARR) is recommended as a screening test for primary aldosteronism (PA). The use of antihypertensive medication is one of the most important factors to take into account when interpreting the ARR. The goal of this study was to compare the effect of various antihypertensive drug classes on biochemical testing and provide practical recommendations for antihypertensive medication regimens in patients suspected of having PA. We retrospectively investigated 4218 hypertensive patients who underwent PA detection between January 2020 and February 2023. Finally, 25 patients with essential hypertension (EH) and 39 with PA were involved. The enrolled EH patients were selected from EH patients with at least two screening tests with interfering medication changes for at least 4 weeks. A total of 2/18 (11.1%) EH patients had opposite screening results after angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), dihydropyridine-calcium channel blockers (DHP-CCBs) and diuretics were withdrawn. A total of 3/3 (100%) of the patients were initially screened as positive but had results that tested negative after β-blockers withdrawal. A total of 3/39 (7.7%) PA patients were misdiagnosed with EH with drug effects. Only plasma renin activity was markedly reduced after antihypertensive medication washout (P = 0.0173). Not every patient receiving β-blockers, ACEIs, ARBs and DHP-CCBs with negative reports needed withdrawal or switching antihypertensive drugs. We recommend that patients be left on a regimen that includes β-blockers, ACEIs, ARBs, DHP-CCBs and spironolactone when determining the ARR during the initial test.

Factors Influencing Adherence to Anti-Hypertensive Medication Regimens in Diabetic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar

Adherence to anti-hypertensive medication among diabetic patients is of paramount importance. Objective: To delve deeper into the influential factors that dictate this adherence behavior, thereby leading to improved healthcare outcomes. Methods: A structured questionnaire grounded on the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) was employed to gather data from a sample of 301 diabetic patients diagnosed with hypertension at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. Parameters such as demographic characteristics, duration of diabetes, and patients' adherence to medication were meticulously recorded and analyzed. Statistical tests such as Chi-square and binary logistic regression were used for data analysis. Results: The study results brought forth that demographic factors like age and gender, coupled with patients' perceptions of their medication, significantly influenced their adherence to anti-hypertensive medication. The study discovered that females were 1.3 times more prone to forget to take their medication relative to males. Furthermore, patients aged below 50 were twice as inclined to discontinue medication when they felt their condition improved. Of particular note, those patients who nurtured misconceptions about the effectiveness and necessity of their medication showed a 1.8 times higher propensity of displaying poor medication adherence. Conclusions: The study underscores the importance of implementing individualized interventions aimed at enhancing medication adherence, especially focusing on female patients, younger patients, and those harboring misconceptions about their medication regimen.

New Users of Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker-Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Based Antihypertensive Medication Regimens and Cardiovascular Disease Events: A Secondary Analysis of ACCORD-BP and SPRINT.

BACKGROUND Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) block distinct components of the renin-angiotensin system. Whether this translates into differential effects on cardiovascular disease events remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS We used the ACCORD-BP (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes-Blood Pressure) trial and the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) to emulate target trials of new users of ARBs versus ACEIs on cardiovascular disease events (primary outcome) and death (secondary outcome). We estimated marginal cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and treatment-specific cumulative incidence functions with inverse probability of treatment weights. We identified 3298 new users of ARBs or ACEIs (ACCORD-BP: 374 ARB versus 884 ACEI; SPRINT: 727 ARB versus 1313 ACEI). For participants initiating ARBs versus ACEIs, the inverse probability of treatment weight rate of the primary outcome was 3.2 versus 3.5 per 100 person-years in ACCORD-BP (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.63-1.31]) and 1.8 versus 2.2 per 100 person-years in SPRINT (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.56-1.18]). There were no appreciable differences in pooled analyses, except that ARBs versus ACEIs were associated with a lower death rate (HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.37-0.85]). ARBs were associated with a lower rate of the primary outcome among subgroups of male versus female participants, non-Hispanic Black versus non-Hispanic White participants, and those randomly assigned to standard versus intensive blood pressure (Pinteraction: <0.01, 0.05, and <0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In this secondary analysis of ACCORD-BP and SPRINT, new users of ARB- versus ACEI-based antihypertensive medication regimens experienced similar cardiovascular disease events rates, with important subgroup differences and lower rates of death overall. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT01206062, NCT00000620.

Blood Pressure Control Following Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers: Insights from a Triple-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial.

Data on substituting one antihypertensive medication with the proper dose of another antihypertensive medication, in certain medical conditions, are scarce. Herein, we present the results of replacing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) with the calcium channel blocker (CCB) amlodipine, with or without the alpha- and beta-blocker carvedilol, to control high blood pressure in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Iranian hypertensive patients with COVID-19 and a history of taking ACEI or ARB were randomized to "continue" and "change" groups. The continue group comprised patients who continued using their previous antihypertensive medication regimen as normal, whereas patients in the change group had their antihypertensive drugs changed to the CCB amlodipine, with or without the alpha- and beta-blocker carvedilol, based on their response to amlodipine. Patients' blood pressures were measured for 8days following their recruitment. A total of 31 and 33 patients were randomly allocated to the ACEI/ARB continue and ACEI/ARB change groups, respectively. No significant deviations were seen in patients' systolic blood pressure by substituting an ACEI/ARB agent with the CCB amlodipine, with or without the alpha- and beta-blocker carvedilol. Moreover, the change group had a more balanced systolic blood pressure (ie, 110-130mmHg) compared with the continue group (ie, 111.5-140.0mmHg) throughout their hospitalization period. During their hospitalization, the blood pressure of the change group was well controlled with the proposed equivalent doses. Further investigations of the proposed equivalent doses in larger randomized clinical trials, populations other than Iranian COVID-19 patients, and extended duration are encouraged (clinical trial registration ID: IRCT20151113025025N3).

Outcomes Following Radiofrequency Renal Denervation According to Antihypertensive Medications: Subgroup Analysis of the Global SYMPLICITY Registry DEFINE.

The Global SYMPLICITY Registry DEFINE (Denervation Findings in Real World) investigates radiofrequency renal denervation (RDN) in a broad range of patients with hypertension. We evaluated whether the number or type of antihypertensive medications were associated with increased long-term blood pressure (BP) reductions and cardiovascular outcomes following radiofrequency RDN. Patients underwent radiofrequency RDN and were categorized by baseline number (0-3 and ≥4) and different combinations of medication classes. BP changes were compared between groups through 36 months. Individual and composite major adverse cardiovascular events were analyzed. Of 2746 evaluable patients, 18% were prescribed 0 to 3 and 82% prescribed ≥4 classes. At 36 months, office systolic BP significantly decreased (P<0.0001) by -19.0±28.3 and -16.2±28.6 mm Hg in the 0 to 3 and ≥4 class groups, respectively. Twenty-four-hour mean systolic BP significantly decreased (P<0.0001) by -10.7±19.7 and -8.9±20.5 mm Hg, respectively. BP reduction was similar between the medication subgroups. Antihypertensive medication classes decreased from 4.6±1.4 to 4.3±1.5 (P<0.0001). Most decreased (31%) or had no changes (47%) to the number of medications, while 22% increased. The number of baseline antihypertensive medication classes was inversely related to the change in prescribed classes at 36 months (P<0.001). Cardiovascular event rates were generally low. More patients in the ≥4 compared with 0 to 3 medication classes had myocardial infarction at 36 months (2.8% versus 0.3%; P=0.009). Radiofrequency RDN reduced BP safely through 36 months, independent of the number and type of baseline antihypertensive medication classes. More patients decreased than increased their number of medications. Radiofrequency RDN is a safe and effective adjunctive therapy regardless of antihypertensive medication regimen. URL: https://www. gov; Unique identifier: NCT01534299.

CAN SERUM CONSENTRATION MEASUREMENTS OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS IMPROVE BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL? A MULTICENTER DOUBLE BLINDED RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Objective: Drug concentration in urine or serum using liquid chromatography coupled to mass-spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) may disclose non-adherence. Whether this direct method will improve adherence is still unknown. In this multicenter randomized controlled trial with a double-blinded approach, we aimed to investigate if measurements and standardized information about serum concentrations of antihypertensive drugs (therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)), could improve blood pressure (BP) control in documented non-adherent hypertensive patients. Design and method: Patients were &gt; = 18 years old with eGFR &gt;30 mL/min/1.73m2, prescribed &gt; = 2 antihypertensive agents and on a stable treatment regimen for at least 4 weeks. Experienced pharmacologists assessed adherence status based on serum drug concentrations, dose and patient-reported time since last intake of the drugs. Patients received no information regarding use of blood samples to screen for non-adherence. The ethics committee approved the study. All patients signed written informed consent. Non-adherent patients with a systolic daytime ambulatory BP (ABPM) &gt; = 135 mmHg were randomized 1:1 to TDM-intervention or not. The number of visits during 6 months follow-up were equal in both groups and antihypertensive medication regimens remained unchanged. Standardized TDM-information was given to the intervention-group at baseline and after 1 and 3 months. The control group remained uninformed about serum drug measurements until after completion of the study. Life style advice and information on necessity of BP treatment, how to remember to take medications and potential hypertension mediated end-organ damage were given to both groups. Investigators and patients were masked for BPs, and separate personnel measuring BPs were blinded to randomization group. Results: From 2017 to 2022, 606 patients (52.3%) of 1159 patients investigated had uncontrolled HT. The non-adherent patients were younger (57.8 vs 64.0 years, p &lt; 0.001), duration of hypertension was shorter (12 vs 16 years, p = 0.024) and daytime diastolic ABPM (90 vs 84 mmHg, p &lt; 0.001) and heart rate (76 vs 70 bpm, p &lt; 0.001) were higher. Uncontrolled and non-adherent patients were enrolled into the subsequent randomized study performed with a double-blinded approach. Conclusions: There was no difference in the primary end-point, daytime systolic ABPM at 3 months, between TDM and control group (-6.7 vs -7.3 mmHg, p = 0.897).

Antihypertensive Medication Regimens Used by US Adults With Hypertension and the Potential for Fixed-Dose Combination Products: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2015 to 2020.

Background Fixed-dose combination (FDC) antihypertensive products improve blood pressure control and adherence among patients with hypertension. It is unknown to what degree commercially available FDC products meet the current hypertension management prescription patterns in the United States. Methods and Results This cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2015 to March 2020 included participants with hypertension taking ≥2 antihypertensive medications (N=2451). After constructing each participant's regimen according to antihypertensive classes used, we estimated the extent to which the 7 class-level FDC regimens available in the United States as of January 2023 would match the regimens used. Among a weighted population of 34.1 million US adults (mean age, 66.0 years; 52.8% women; 69.1% non-Hispanic White race and ethnicity), the proportions using 2, 3, 4, and ≥5 antihypertensive classes were 60.6%, 28.2%, 9.1%, and 1.6%, respectively. The 7 FDC regimens were among 189 total regimens used (3.7%), and 39.2% of the population used one of the FDC regimens (95% CI, 35.5%-43.0%; 13.4 million US adults); 60.8% of the population (95% CI, 57.0%-64.5%; 20.7 million US adults) were using a regimen not available as a class-equivalent FDC product. Conclusions Three in 5 US adults with hypertension taking ≥2 antihypertensive classes are using a regimen that is not commercially available as a class-equivalent FDC product as of January 2023. To maximize the potential benefit of FDCs to improve medication adherence (and thus blood pressure control) among patients taking multiple antihypertensive medications, use of FDC-compatible regimens and improvements in the product landscape are needed.

Association of New Use of Antihypertensives That Stimulate vs Inhibit Type 2 and 4 Angiotensin II Receptors With Dementia Among Medicare Beneficiaries

Prevalent use of antihypertensive medications that stimulate type 2 and 4 angiotensin II receptors, compared with those that do not stimulate these receptors, has been associated with a lower risk of dementia. However, previous studies were limited by inclusion of individuals with prevalent hypertension and a history of antihypertensive use prior to the start of the study, which can introduce bias. To examine the association of new use of antihypertensive medication regimens that stimulate vs inhibit type 2 and 4 angiotensin II receptors with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) among Medicare beneficiaries. This cohort study was conducted among 57 773 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries (January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2018) aged 65 years or older with incident hypertension. Data analysis was conducted from January 1 through June 30, 2022. Initiation of antihypertensive medication regimens that stimulate or inhibit type 2 and 4 angiotensin II receptors, or mixed regimens (both stimulating and inhibiting), with the time-dependent measure being each 30-day interval. The primary outcome was time to first occurrence of ADRD (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse definition). Cox proportional hazards regression modeling with time-dependent variables was performed to estimate the association between time-dependent treatment groups and time to ADRD, after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. The sample included 57 773 Medicare beneficiaries (36 348 women [62.9%]; mean [SD] age, 73.8 [6.3] years; 2954 [5.1%] Black, 1545 [2.7%] Hispanic; 50 184 [86.9%] White, and 3090 [5.4%] Other individuals [the Other category included individuals of American Indian, Asian, other, or unknown race and ethnicity]). During a median of 6.9 years (IQR, 4.7-9.3 years) of follow-up, the unadjusted incidence density rate of ADRD was 2.2 cases per 100 person-years (95% CI, 2.1-2.4 cases per 100 person-years) for the group receiving regimens that stimulate type 2 and 4 angiotensin II receptors compared with 3.1 cases per 100 person-years (95% CI, 3.0-3.2 cases per 100 person-years) for the group receiving regimens that inhibit type 2 and 4 angiotensin II receptors and 2.7 cases per 100 person-years (95% CI, 2.6-2.9 cases per 100 person-years) for the group receiving mixed treatment regimens. In adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression modeling, stimulating treatment was associated with a statistically significant 16% reduction in the hazard of ADRD compared with inhibiting treatment (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.90). Mixed regimen use was also associated with reduced hazards of ADRD compared with the inhibiting group (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.96). This cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries suggests that use of antihypertensive medications that stimulate type 2 and 4 angiotensin II receptors was associated with lower risk of ADRD compared with antihypertensive medications that inhibit these receptors. Confirmation is needed in a randomized trial.

DB-2-3: ANTIHYPERTENSIVE STRATEGIES IN END-OF LIFE OLD PATIENTS (PRO/CON SESSION)

High blood pressure (BP) especially systolic BP is very common in older persons and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Evidence from a limited number of clinical studies indicates that people 80+ y.o. can get significant benefits from BP lowering treatments and that targeting SBP &lt; 140 mmHg reduces morbidity and mortality. However, these clinical studies excluded patients with high frailty and severe alteration of functionality/autonomy. Indeed, in subjects with this clinical profiles, observational data indicate that low SBP is associated with higher morbidity and mortality particularly in those with antihypertensive medication and multiple other drug regimens. These observations made in very altered or end-of-life patients by several clinical research groups should be taken into account by the clinicians, and therefore deprescription i.e. reduction of the antihypertensive treatment, should be considered in presence of very low SBP levels (&lt;130mmHg). However, this approach should be viewed with great caution: firstly, observational studies provide weak evidence and therefore further data are needed from controlled clinical trials in very old patients with the health condition and of autonomy status described above, i.e. people who have been systematically excluded from clinical trials so far. Second, deprescribing should be done gradually, taking into account comorbidities and patient preferences. Finally, in these patients, emphasis should be given to the quality of life and symptoms relief when choosing therapeutic strategies. Collaboration between hypertension specialists, geriatricians and clinical pharmacists is a key issue in this perspective.

Antihypertensive Medication Regimens Used in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.

Describing the antihypertensive medication regimens used in the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) would contextualize the standard and intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) interventions and may inform future implementation efforts to achieve population-wide intensive SBP goals. We included SPRINT participants with complete medication data at the prerandomization and 12-month visits. Regimens were categorized by antihypertensive medication class. Analyses were stratified by treatment group (standard goal SBP <140 mm Hg versus intensive goal SBP <120 mm Hg). Among 7860 participants (83.7% of 9361 randomized), the median number of classes used at the prerandomization visit was 2.0 and 2.0 in the standard and intensive groups (P=0.559). At 12-months, the median number of classes used was 3.0 and 2.0 in the intensive and standard groups (P<0.001). Prerandomization, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE), or angiotensin-II receptor blocker (ARB) monotherapy was the most common regimen in the intensive and standard groups (12.6% versus 12.2%). At 12-months, ACE/ARB monotherapy was still the most common regimen among standard group participants (14.7%) and was used by 5.3% of intensive group participants. Multidrug regimens used by the intensive and standard participants at 12 months were as follows: an ACE/ARB with thiazide (12.2% and 7.9%); an ACE/ARB with calcium channel blocker (6.2% and 6.8%); an ACE/ARB, thiazide, and calcium channel blocker (11.4% and 4.3%); and an ACE/ARB, thiazide, calcium channel blocker, and beta-blocker (6.5% and 1.2%). SPRINT investigators favored combining ACEs or ARBs, thiazide diuretics, and calcium channel blockers to target SBP <120 mm Hg, compared to ACE/ARB monotherapy to target SBP <140 mm Hg. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01206062.

A comparative study of antihypertensive drugs prediction models for the elderly based on machine learning algorithms.

Globally, blood pressure management strategies were ineffective, and a low percentage of patients receiving hypertension treatment had their blood pressure controlled. In this study, we aimed to build a medication prediction model by correlating patient attributes with medications to help physicians quickly and rationally match appropriate medications. We collected clinical data from elderly hypertensive patients during hospitalization and combined statistical methods and machine learning (ML) algorithms to filter out typical indicators. We constructed five ML models to evaluate all datasets using 5-fold cross-validation. Include random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), artificial neural network (ANN), and naive Bayes (NB) models. And the performance of the models was evaluated using the micro-F1 score. Our experiments showed that by statistical methods and ML algorithms for feature selection, we finally selected Age, SBP, DBP, Lymph, RBC, HCT, MCHC, PLT, AST, TBIL, Cr, UA, Urea, K, Na, Ga, TP, GLU, TC, TG, γ-GT, Gender, HTN CAD, and RI as feature metrics of the models. LightGBM had the best prediction performance with the micro-F1 of 78.45%, which was higher than the other four models. LightGBM model has good results in predicting antihypertensive medication regimens, and the model can be beneficial in improving the personalization of hypertension treatment.

Impact of antihypertensive medication regimens on blood pressure control in individuals with established coronary heart disease

Abstract Background and purpose Hypertension is a major risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) development and progression, with pharmacological control of blood pressure reducing the risk of CHD events and death [1]. Treatment and control of blood pressure in CHD is suboptimal, with many patients failing to achieve guideline-directed targets [1,2]. This study aims to assess the relationship between antihypertensive medication regimens and blood pressure control in patients with hypertension and established coronary heart disease. Methods The iASPIRE study recently evaluated secondary prevention in an Irish cohort with coronary heart disease [2]. Based on a method used in a similar study [3], we calculated the average percentage daily dose of each prescribed antihypertensive agent. We then assessed the relationship between dose and number of antihypertensive agents with blood pressure control. Results 540 (75.5%) of iASPIRE participants had an underlying diagnosis of hypertension, and at the study examination, 56% of these had a blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg, while 83% had a blood pressure ≥130/80 mmHg. The median number of antihypertensive agents prescribed was 2 (IQR 1–2), with 88% of those with hypertension on at least one blood pressure medication. In participants with hypertension on treatment, the median percentage daily medication dose was 29% (IQR 14–50). After adjustment for age and sex, the addition of further antihypertensive medications increased the odds of achieving a blood pressure target of &amp;lt;130/80 mmHg (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.07–1.69, p=0.012). The average percentage daily dose of each antihypertensive agent was lower in both participants with a medication-controlled blood pressure of &amp;lt;130/80 mmHg and &amp;lt;140/90 mmHg compared to those without blood pressure control (30% versus 37% p=0.006 and 33% versus 38% p=0.028 respectively). Conclusion Many patients with hypertension and coronary heart disease currently fail to achieve blood pressure control. This analysis found that an increasing number of antihypertensive medications but not increasing dose was associated with better blood pressure control. Combination therapy is superior to sequential monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension [1], and an approach that emphasises the initiation of several antihypertensive agents would likely lead to better blood pressure control in individuals with coronary heart disease. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Beta Blockers are Associated with Decreased 30-Day Postoperative Stroke Risk Following Both Carotid Stenting and Endarterectomy in Patients with Hypertension

Stroke is a significant complication associated with both carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS). Hypertension is a strong risk factor for development of carotid stenosis and is present in over 80% of patients undergoing carotid revascularization. Antihypertensive therapy is associated with reduced stroke risk in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Our aim was to determine whether antihypertensive medication regimens can impact stroke risk in patients following carotid revascularization.