Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-computed Tomography Research Articles

Role of Ga68 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Prostate Cancer Imaging

AbstractThe introduction of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in clinical practice has revolutionized the evaluation of biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer after curative-intent treatment. The high expression of this glycoprotein in prostate cancer cells makes PSMA imaging superior to the current conventional staging methods, namely bone scanning and computed tomography. The high capability of PSMA imaging for identifying very small previously undetected lesions has been widely demonstrated in the literature, leading to a rethinking of patient management by treating physicians. The usual and predictable patterns of spread in prostate cancer are still more prevalent, such as spread to pelvic lymph nodes and bone metastasis, but different patterns of disease spread are becoming more commonly recognized with higher reliability because PSMA imaging allows the detection of more usual and unusual lesions than conventional imaging. The expanding use of PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) has also revealed PSMA ligand uptake in diverse nonprostatic diseases, which raised questions about the specificity of this imaging modality. It is important for the reading physician to recognize and understand the usual disease spread, the most prevalent unusual sites of relapse, and the nonprostatic conditions which are PSMA avid not only to heighten the relevancy of reports but also to improve imaging consultancy in multispecialty oncologic practice. This article aims to brief the role of PSMA PET in the initial staging of multitude of clinical scenarios, BCR, castration-resistant prostate cancer, usual and unusual patterns of recurrence and metastatic spread diagnosed with PSMA PET, normal variants, pitfalls, and nonprostatic disorders showing PSMA expression.

Detection of Docetaxel-induced Interstitial Pneumonitis on Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT Imaging.

Ga-68 labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) is increasingly recognized as the best imaging modality for disease staging and detection of recurrent prostate cancer. Despite its name, PSMA expression has been reported in the neovasculature of several nonprostatic benign and malignant pathologies. Docetaxel, a taxane antineoplastic agent, is the mainstay of treatment in castration-resistant prostate cancer and high-volume hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Although the occurrence of docetaxel-related interstitial lung disease is rare, it may lead to respiratory failure if treatment is delayed. We present a case of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, wherein docetaxel-induced interstitial pneumonitis was detected on Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT after docetaxel administration.

A comparison study of 68gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for locoregional staging of prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men aged 50 years and older and the second cause of cancer death among men. Accurate staging of PCa preoperatively is of high importance for treatment decisions and patient management. Conventional imaging modalities (ultrasound, computed tomography [CT], and magnetic resonance imaging) are inaccurate for the staging of PCa. Newer modality multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) scan show promising results for the staging of PCa. Only fewer studies are available for comparison of these modalities with histopathology as reference. The objective of our study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of independent 68gallium PSMA (68Ga-PSMA) PET-CT compared with mpMRI for preoperative staging of PCa, using histopathology as the reference standard. From August 2021 to December 2022, 30 patients of biopsy-proven PCa were prospectively enrolled as per eligibility criteria. Preoperatively, 68Ga-PSMA PET scan and mpMRI were done in all the patients. Extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and lymph node metastasis (LNM) were investigated separately. Subsequently, the patients underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. mpMRI prostate was more sensitive (66.66%) but less specific than PSMA PET-CT (55.55%) for ECE. mpMRI and PSMA PET-CT both had similar sensitivity (83.3%) and specificity (87.5%) for SVI. PSMA PET-CT was more sensitive (85.71%) and specific (95.6%) than mpMRI prostate (62.5% and 91.30%, respectively) for LNM. PSMA PET-CT is more specific for the detection of ECE and more sensitive and specific for the detection of LNM than mpMRI, and similar for the detection of SVI. mpMRI provides only local staging, while PSMA PET-CT provides information about local, regional, and distal staging. Overall, PSMA PET-CT is superior to mpMRI for locoregional staging of PCa.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Uptake in the Scrotum and Epididymis on PET-CT: When is it Pathological?

Prostate cancer is the most common solid organ tumor in men and has been reported to metastasize to unusual sites such as the epididymis. The clinical standard for detecting recurrent disease is through positive emission tomography/computed tomography with the radiotracer 18F-DCFPyL binding prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expressed by cancerous cells. Although PSMA can also be expressed physiologically, metastases are more likely to be intensely PSMA expressing and in a typical distribution depending on the extent of disease burden in the individual patient. A MEDLINE search revealed only three other case reports of isolated epididymal metastases from prostate cancer diagnosed with prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography. This case series comprising both metastatic and physiological PSMA expression in the epididymis provides a useful framework for the interpreting physician when the possibility of this rare but important finding is encountered in prostate cancer imaging.

Prostate cancer management in Southeast Asian countries: a survey of clinical practice patterns.

Prostate cancer (PC) has a serious public health impact, and its incidence is rising due to the aging population. There is limited evidence and consensus to guide the management of PC in Southeast Asia (SEA). We present real-world data on clinical practice patterns in SEA for advanced PC care. A paper-based survey was used to identify clinical practice patterns and obtain consensus among the panelists. The survey included the demographics of the panelists, the use of clinical guidelines, and clinical practice patterns in the management of advanced PC in SEA. Most panelists (81%) voted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as the most effective test for early PC diagnosis and risk stratification. Nearly 44% of panelists agreed that prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging for PC diagnostic and staging information aids local and systemic therapy decisions. The majority of the panel preferred abiraterone acetate (67%) or docetaxel (44%) as first-line therapy for symptomatic mCRPC patients. Abiraterone acetate (50%) is preferred over docetaxel as a first-line treatment in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer patients with high-volume disease. However, the panel did not support the use of abiraterone acetate in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) patients. Apalutamide (75%) is the preferred treatment option for patients with nmCRPC. The cost and availability of modern treatments and technologies are important factors influencing therapeutic decisions. All panelists supported the use of generic versions of approved therapies. The survey results reflect real-world management of advanced PC in a SEA country. These findings could be used to guide local clinical practices and highlight the financial challenges of modern healthcare.

Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on Survival and Management in Prostate Cancer.

68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) has led to altered treatment plans for prostate cancer (PCa) patients. This study aimed to investigate the impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on overall survival (OS) and management in PCa. Consecutive 100 patients who had 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and conventional imaging (CI) were included in this retrospective study. Disease stages and treatment plans according to both CI and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were compared. The effect of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on OS was assessed. After 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, the stage changed in 64 patients (64%). By the reason of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT findings, treatment plans based on CI were changed in 73 patients (73%). According to the ROC analysis, patients with a PSA value below 8 had higher rates of change in staging (p<0.0001) and treatment (p=0.034). Both a PSA below 8 (OR 8.79 95% CI (2.72-28.43), p<0.001), and having a hormone-sensitive disease at the time of imaging (OR 5.6 95% CI (1.35-23.08), p=0.017) were significant independent factors predicting change in staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. The results of a phi correlation coefficient analysis showed a significant relationship between therapy and changes in staging (ϕ=0.638, p<0.0001). Two-year OS was statistically different in hormone-sensitive patients with and without treatment change (95% vs 81%, p=0.006). 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT has the effect of changing the treatment in 73% of PCa patients. There is a positive correlation between the changes in staging and treatment. Survival of hormone sensitive patients has improved due to treatment changes based on PET/CT findings.

Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer using a novel 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and multiparametric MRI-based model.

There are some limitations in the commonly used methods for the detection of prostate cancer. There is a lack of nomograms based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for the prediction of prostate cancer. The study seeks to compare the performance of mpMRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT, and design a novel predictive model capable of predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) before biopsy based on a combination of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT, mpMRI, and patient clinical parameters. From September 2020 to June 2021, we prospectively enrolled 112 consecutive patients with no prior history of prostate cancer who underwent both 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and mpMRI prior to biopsy at our clinical center. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify predictors of csPCa, with a predictive model and its nomogram incorporating 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT, mpMRI, and the clinical predictors then being generated. The constructed model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis, and further validated with the internal and external cohorts. The model incorporated prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd), Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and it exhibited excellent predictive efficacy when applying to evaluate both training and validation cohorts [area under the curve (AUC): 0.936 and 0.940, respectively]. Compared with SUVmax alone, the model demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance with improved specificity (0.910, 95% CI: 0.824-0.963) and positive predictive values (0.811, 95% CI: 0.648-0.920). Calibration curve and decision curve analysis further confirmed that the model exhibited a high degree of clinical net benefit and low error rate. The constructed model in this study was capable of accurately predicting csPCa prior to biopsy with excellent discriminative ability. As such, this model has the potential to be an effective non-invasive approach for the diagnosis of csPCa.

Standardised Uptake Value in Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in 68-Ga- Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Scan and its Correlation with Prostate Specific Antigen Level and Gleason Score.

A positron emission tomography (PET) scan and a computed tomography (CT) scan are an integral part of oncological imaging and other modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging, CT or bone scintigraphy have some limitations in staging the workup of prostate carcinoma. Combined with tissue-specific markers like prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), positron emitter-based functional imaging results have improved. Our study aimed to determine the Standardised Uptake Value (SUVmax) in prostate adenocarcinoma that is confined to the organ in Ga-68-PSMA PET-CT scans and how it correlates with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and Gleason score (GS). This cross-sectional study was conducted at Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation (SIUT), Karachi, and includes subjects referred for a Ga68-PSMA PET-CT scan from September 2017 to January 2022. Histopathologic-proven adenocarcinoma prostate patients with organ-confined disease and PSA levels obtained within 6 weeks before the PSMA-PET-CT scan were included in the study. PET-CT images were semi-quantitatively analysed by measuring SUVmax and the result was interpreted using statistical software SPSS version 22.0. A total of 154 patients were analysed. The mean age of patients was 66.57 ± 8.86 years. The GS of all patients ranges from 6 to 10. The mean and median PSA levels were 32.33 ng/mL (range: 0.004-306.00) and 14.20 ng/mL, respectively. The mean SUVmax of all prostatic lesions was 14.67 ± 12.58 and the median value was 10.76. SUVmax was higher in patients with a PSA level of more than ten than those with a <10. The correlation of SUVmax with PSA and GS showed a significant correlation. The SUVmax of organ-confined prostate cancer correlates well with PSA level and GS Median SUVmax and PSA directly relate to GS.

Multi-Institutional Clinical Outcomes of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group 5 Prostate Cancers Treated With Contemporary High-Dose Radiation and Long-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy

AimsThis multicentric retrospective study reports long-term clinical outcomes of non-metastatic grade group 5 prostate cancers treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) alone with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Materials and methodsPatients treated across 19 institutions were studied. The key endpoints that were evaluated were 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), metastases-free survival (MFS), overall survival, together with EBRT-related acute and late toxicities. The impact of various prognostic factors on the studied endpoints was analysed using univariate and multivariate analyses. ResultsAmong the 462 patients, 88% (405) had Gleason 9 disease and 31% (142) had primary Gleason pattern 5. A prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan was used for staging in 33% (153), 80% (371) were staged as T3/T4 and 30% (142) with pelvic nodal disease. The median ADT duration was 24 months; 66% received hypofractionated EBRT and 71.4% (330) received pelvic nodal irradiation. With a median follow-up of 56 months, the 5-year bRFS, MFS and overall survival were 73.1%, 77.4% and 90.5%, respectively. Primary Gleason pattern 5 was associated with worse bRFS, MFS and overall survival with hazard ratios of 0.51 (95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.73, P < 0.001), 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.96, P = 0.031) and 0.52 (95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.97, P = 0.040), respectively, whereas pelvic nodal disease was associated with worse bRFS (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 0.98, P = 0.039) and MFS (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.85, P = 0.006). The acute and late radiation-related toxicities were low overall and pelvic nodal irradiation was associated with higher toxicities. ConclusionContemporary EBRT and long-term ADT led to excellent 5-year clinical outcomes and low rates of toxicity in this cohort of non-metastatic grade group 5 prostate cancers. Primary Gleason pattern 5 and pelvic node disease portends inferior clinical outcomes.

Using of 18 fluorine labeled prostatic specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography in staging of prostatic cancer in correlation with prostate specific antigen level

Using of 18 fluorine labeled prostatic specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography in staging of prostatic cancer in correlation with prostate specific antigen level

PP49 Financing The Line Of Care In The First Biochemical Relapse Of Prostate Cancer After [68Ga] PSMA PET- CT

IntroductionIt is estimated that prostate cancer will reach 66 thousand by the triennium 2020-2022 according to the National Cancer Institute (INCA). After initial diagnosis and staging the patient may undergo radical prostatectomy and/or curative radiotherapy. In patients with biochemical relapse (PSA &gt;0.2 ng/ml) initially treated with radical prostatectomy, salvage external radiotherapy is indicated. The [68Ga] Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PSMA PET-CT) scan is mainly used for localization of prostate cancer in the setting of first biochemical recurrence and can significantly influence the clinical management of the patient.MethodsThe overall objective of this work is to perform a treatment cost analysis for patients in first biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after curative radical prostatectomy and after performing [68Ga] PSMA PET-CT from the perspective of the Brazilian Health System (SUS). A decision tree was constructed through consultation with experts to outline the patient’s entire treatment. Values per modelled therapeutic procedure were surveyed in two different scenarios, with and without [68Ga] PSMA PET-CT. The average treatment in scenario 1 was stereotaxic radiation therapy (SBRT), and rescue radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In scenario 2, it was salvage radiotherapy and ADT. The reimbursement table was prepared from data collected by SUS system. Variations were analyzed using a sensitivity study. Total average values included: individual procedure, according to medical management (up to 3 years) and population percentage with and without [68Ga] PSMA PET-CT.ResultsValues were calculated in Brazilian currency (BRL) for each procedure. The total amount calculated for scenario 1 was BRL 264,965,465.00 (USD 55,642,747.65) and for scenario 2 was BRL 123,585,612.72 (USD 26,162,978.67).ConclusionsThe reimbursement of line of care adopted after [68Ga] PSMA PET-CT is an important information to expand access to the Brazilian population. It shows an increased cost with [68Ga] PSMA PET-CT adoption. A prospective study should be considered with high follow up.

Effects of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Extraocular Muscles, Retrobulbar Orbital Fat, and the Optic Nerve in Patients with Prostate Cancer

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate radiologically the effects of long-term luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist therapy on extraocular muscle thickness, retrobulbar orbital fat (ROF), and the optic nerve (ON) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Methods: The retrospective study included patients with primary or recurrent PCa who received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for at least 12 months. Each patient underwent gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography both before and at the end of the 12-month treatment. Thickness of the ON, lateral rectus muscle, medial rectus muscle, superior rectus muscle, and inferior rectus muscle were measured by using the coronal CT sections in soft tissue window. ROF, ocular protrusion, and ON length were measured in sagittal and coronal planes. Changes in these anatomical structures induced by LHRH analogs were investigated by comparing pre- and post-treatment measurements. Results: A total of 57 patients were included in the study. Median PSA and TT values ​​of the patients before treatment were 36.5 (range, 19.6–51.2) ng/mL and 614.0 (range, 472.0–743.0) ng/dL, respectively, and these values ​​decreased significantly after the treatment (10.6 [range, 5.2–14.2] ng/mL and 36.5 [range, 19.6–51.2] ng/dL, respectively, p < 0.001 for both). After the treatment, there was a statistically significant decrease in the areas of inferior rectus muscle, superior rectus muscle, lateral rectus muscle, and medial rectus muscle (p < 0.001 for all), while significant increases were observed in ROF (11.9%, p < 0.001) and ON thickness (14.3%, p = 0.004). The amount of ocular protrusion also showed a significant increase of approximately 14% after the treatment (14.0 [range, 12.0–16.0] mm vs. 16.0 [range, 14.0–17.2] mm, p < 0.001). Discussion/Conclusion: Our findings, for the first time in the literature, indicated that ADT causes a decrease in extraocular muscle mass and an increase in ROF with ocular protrusion. It can be asserted that these changes are similar to the changes in skeletal muscle and fat mass in other body parts. Further studies with a higher level of evidence are needed to clinically evaluate the increase in ocular protrusion and ON enlargement, which are likely to be caused by the increase in ROF.

F-18 PSMA Uptake in Male Breast Cancer during Restaging Evaluation of Carcinoma Prostate.

Fluorine-18 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan is widely used for restaging of prostate cancer. We present a case where false-positive PSMA uptake was seen in metachronous carcinoma breast during restaging workup of carcinoma prostate.

Cancers and Benign Processes on 68Ga PSMA PET-CT Imaging Other than Prostate Cancer

Background Imaging plays an important role in the evaluation of prostate cancer patients. In recent years, much attention has been focused on gallium 68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography ( 68 Ga PSMA PET-CT) in prostate cancer patients and has been widely used for staging, restaging, and therapy response for these patients. The aim of this study was to report 68 Ga PSMA PET-CT in other cancers and benign processes incidentally detected on 68 Ga PSMA PET-CT in patients with prostate cancer. Materials and Methods A total of 600 68 Ga PSMA PET-CT scans were performed for initial staging, restaging, detection of suspected recurrence, and therapy response in prostate cancer patients between December 2018 and June 2020. A total of 38 patients with histopathologically proven prostate cancer were included in the current study with other malignancies and benign processes. Mainly histopathology in most of cases and clinical and radiological follow-up in few cases after PET/CT scanning served as the standard of reference. Results A total of 38 patients (age range: 52–85 years; mean age: 68.6) with prostate cancer final histopathology results were included in the study. A total of 51 lesion sites were evaluated in 38 patients. Forty-one lesion regions of these 51 regions were based on histopathological diagnosis, whereas 10 of them were based on clinical follow-up and conventional radiological follow-up as differential criteria. Thirty of 51 lesion regions were evaluated as malignant and 21 were benign lesions. The most common 68 Ga PSMA ligand avid malignancy was lung adenocarcinoma (6/38). Conclusions Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a cell surface glycoprotein and mainly expressed in prostate epithelium. 68 Ga PSMA PET-CT imaging is very sensitive and specific imaging modality in prostate cancer patients. However, other malignancies and some benign processes may also have 68 Ga PSMA ligand avidity and some prostate cancer metastases may imitate other malignancies.

PSMA PET-CT Imaging Predicts Treatment Progression in Men with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer-A Prospective Study of Men with 3 Year Follow Up.

Simple SummaryProstate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is an essential imaging tool that is used to locate prostate cancer when it recurs. The results of this scan are used to guide clinical decisions for the management of cancer. However, the long-term effect of these clinical decisions is yet to be determined. In this study, we followed men with recurrent prostate cancer for 3 years after they had a clinical decision made based on a PSMA PET-CT. Our results showed that 75% of men had no addition or change in their treatment plan 3 years after their initial clinical decision was made. In men with a PSMA PET-CT that showed no suspected cancer, 85% had no addition or change to their treatment plan. This indicates that clinical decisions made using PSMA PET-CT in this setting can have a medium- to long-lasting effect.Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is a novel imaging modality used to stage recurrent prostate cancer. It has the potential to improve prognostication and ultimately guide the timing of treatment for men with recurrent prostate cancer. This study aims to assess the clinical impact of PSMA PET-CT by analyzing its predictive value of treatment progression after 3 years of follow-up. In this prospective cohort study of 100 men, patients received a PSMA PET-CT for restaging of their disease which was used by a multi-disciplinary team to make a treatment decision. The primary endpoint was treatment progression. This was defined as the addition or change of any treatment modalities such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), radiation therapy or chemotherapy. The median follow-up time was 36 months (IQR 24–40 months). No treatment progression was found in 72 (75%) men and therefore 24 (25%) patients were found to have treatment progression. In men with a negative PSMA PET-CT result, 5/33 (15.1%) had treatment progression and 28/33 (84.8%) had no treatment progression. In conclusion, clinical decisions made with PSMA PET-CT results led to 75% of men having no treatment progression at 3 years of follow-up. In men with negative PSMA PET-CT results, this increased to 85% of men.

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 68Ga Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography, and Respective Quantitative Parameters in Detection and Localization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Intermediate- and High-Risk Group Patients: An Indian Demographic Study.

Objectives:The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and 68Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PSMA PET-CT) and respective quantitative parameters (Ktrans – influx rate contrast, Kep – efflux rate constant, ADC – apparent diffusion coefficient, and SUVmax ratio – prostate SUVmax to background SUVmax ratio) in detection and localization of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) in D’Amico intermediate- and high-risk group patients (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] >10 ng/ml).Methodology:The study included thirty-three consecutive adult men with serum prostate specific antigen >10ng/ml, and systematic 12 core prostate biopsy proven prostate cancer. All the 33 patients, were evaluated with mpMRI, and 68Ga PSMA PET-CT. The biopsy specimens and imaging were evaluated for 12 sectors per prostate by a predetermined scheme.Results:MpMRI Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) score ≥3 showed higher sensitivity than 68Ga PSMA PET-CT (96.3% vs. 82.4%), with similar specificity (54.5% vs. 54.5%) (n = 33 patients, 396 sectors). Combined use of MRI and 68Ga PSMA PET-CT in parallel increased sensitivity (99.5%) and NPV (98.7%) for detection of CSPCa and combined use of MRI and 68Ga PSMA PET-CT in series increased specificity (71.8%) and PPV (71.5%) (n = 33 patients, 396 sectors). ADC showed a strong negative correlation with Gleason score (r = −0.77), and the highest discriminative ability for detection and localization of CSPCa (area under curve [AUC]: 0.91), followed by Ktrans (r = 0.74; AUC: 0.89), PI-RADS (0.73; 0.86), SUVmax ratio (0.49; 0.74), and Kep (0.24; 0.66).Conclusion:MpMRI PI-RADS v2 score and 68Ga PSMA PET-CT (individually as well as in combination) are reliable tool for detection and localization of CSPCa. Quantitative MRI and 68Ga PSMA PET-CT parameters have potential to predict Gleason score and detect CSPCa.

Is SUV Corrected for Lean Body Mass Superior to SUV of Body Weight in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT?

Objectives:This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the standard uptake value (SUV) of body weight and SUV corrected for lean body mass (SUL) parameters obtained from the prostate gland in gallium-68 (68Ga)-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) with Gleason grade (GG) groups, D’Amico risk groups, and presence of metastases.Methods:Patients with prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging at our center between February 2017 and October 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Maximum SUV (SUVmax), SUVpeak, SULmax, SULpeak, SUVmean, and SULmean values of the prostate tumor were obtained. The difference in these values between GG groups (≥3, <3) and D’Amico risk (low-moderate/high) groups was evaluated with the Mann-Whitney U test. The area under the curve values of SUV and SUL parameters were compared. In addition, SUVmean and SULmean values were obtained from the right liver lobe, and their correlation with body weight was evaluated.Results:A total of 79 patients were included in the study. Significant differences were found in the prostate SUVmax, SULmax, SUVpeak, SULpeak, SUVmean, and SULmean values between the GG (≥3 and <3) groups and between D’Amico risk (low-moderate and high) groups. However, no significant difference was found in the discriminative power of any SUV or SUL parameter when compared with each other. A significant difference in any SUV and SUL parameters was found in patients with and without metastasis. Neither liver SUVmean value nor SULmean value correlated with the body weight.Conclusion:The superiority of SUL values obtained from 68Ga-PSMA PET to SUV was not determined in our study. SUV parameters can also be used for quantitative analysis in 68Ga-PSMA PET.

68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography-Based Primary Staging and Histological Correlation after Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT)-based primary staging in exclusively D′Amico intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Patients and Methods: We relied on the Braunschweig institutional database and retrospectively identified D′Amico intermediate-risk PCa patients who were administered to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT-based primary staging prior to consecutive radical prostatectomy and extended lymph node dissection. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the detection of lymph node metastases were analyzed per-patient (n = 39), per-pelvic side (n = 78), and per-anatomic-region (external iliac artery and vein left/right vs. obturator fossa left/right vs. internal iliac artery left/right) (n = 203), respectively. Results: Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV per-patient were 20.0, 94.1, 33.3, and 88.9%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV per-pelvic-side were 16.7, 97.2, 33.3, and 93.3%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV per-anatomic-region were 16.7, 99.0, 33.3, and 97.5%, respectively. Conclusions: We recorded high rates of specificity and NPV for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT-based primary staging in D′Amico intermediate-risk PCa patients. Conversely, the sensitivity and PPV were lower than anticipated. Larger and favorably prospective trials are needed to verify our results and to unravel possible bias from such smaller studies.

Safety and Efficacy of Ultra-hypofractionation in Node-positive Prostate Cancer

AimsThe safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in localised prostate cancer are now established through phase III randomised trials. Its utility in node-positive prostate cancer is restricted due to a lack of controlled studies specifically addressing this subgroup. Herein we report the safety and efficacy of SBRT in this subgroup. Materials and methodsIn total, 60 patients treated with SBRT to prostate and pelvis were analysed. All patients received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy for at least 6 months and long-term adjuvant hormonal therapy (70% medical and 30% surgical). All patients were treated with daily image-guided rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The dose delivered to the prostate and gross node was 35–37.5 Gy and 25 Gy in five fractions to the elective pelvic nodal region on alternate days. Acute and late toxicities were graded as per Radiation Therapy Oncology Group common toxicity criteria. ResultsForty-one (68%) patients had a Gleason score ≥8. The median prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis was 39 ng/ml. Twenty (33%) patients had common iliac nodal uptake on initial prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography. After the median follow-up of 30 months, no acute or late Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity was noted. Acute grade 2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were 8.3% and 11.7%, respectively. Late grade 2 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were 3.3% and 8.3%, respectively. Late grade 3 genitourinary toxicity was seen in two (3.3%) patients. Three-year overall survival and biochemical failure-free survival was 89% and 77%, respectively. ConclusionSBRT to the prostate and pelvis is safe and efficacious in node-positive prostate cancer even with common iliac nodal involvement (stage M1a).

Understanding the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer continues to be the most commonly diagnosed cancer, and the second leading cause of cancer death among Australian men. Prostate-specific antigen testing is personalised (not dichotomous in nature) and its interpretation should take into account the patient's age, symptoms, previous results and medication (eg, 5-α reductase inhibitors such as dutasteride). Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate has been proven to have a 93% sensitivity for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer. It has the potential to decrease unnecessary prostate biopsies by around 27%. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 1 (Gleason score 6) has been shown to have very little, if any, risk of metastasis ISUP grade 1 (Gleason score 3+3=6) and low percentage ISUP grade 2 (Gleason score 3+4 [<10%]=7) can be offered active surveillance. The goal of active surveillance is to defer treatment but is still curative when required. With better imaging (magnetic resonance imaging and emerging prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography) and transperineal prostate biopsy, more men can be offered screening after discussion of risks and benefits, knowing that overdiagnosis has been minimised and radical treatment is reserved for only the most aggressive disease.