Anti-drug Antibodies Research Articles

Development and application of an in vitro assay to assess target-independent B-cell activation by targeted TLR7 immune agonists

Targeted immune agonist (TIA) comprising a TLR7 agonist conjugated to tumor-targeting antibodies have been shown to induce potent anti-tumor responses in various preclinical models. However, the clinical proof-of-concept of a TIA has been hampered by systemic dose-limiting immune-related toxicities, including rapid induction of anti-drug antibodies in patients. We have developed ELISPOT-based assay to measure activation of antibody-secreting cells (ASCs), intended to simulate the interaction between TIA and peripheral B cells as a tool to pre-clinically de-risk tumor target-independent peripheral B-cell activation by TIA. This method has proven to be robust and has fast turn-around time to evaluate the induction of spontaneous B-cell activation by TIA in a tumor target- and FcγR-independent manner. This novel ASC assay platform may serve as a preclinical tool to de-risk TIAs that can potentially induce immune-related adverse effects in the clinic.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Patisiran in Patients with hATTR Amyloidosis and with Polyneuropathy After Liver Transplantation.

Variants of the transthyretin (TTR) gene cause hereditary transthyretin-mediated (hATTR) amyloidosis, or ATTRv amyloidosis (v for variant), which results from deposition of misfolded TTR protein as amyloid in organs and tissues. Patisiran is an RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutic that suppresses the hepatic production of TTR protein. Patisiran improves multiple clinical manifestations of hATTR amyloidosis in patients without liver transplantation (LT). Because the liver is the predominant source of circulating TTR, LT has been prescribed to eliminate the production of the variant TTR. However, the continued production of wild-type TTR can contribute to disease progression after LT. Patisiran could potentially address an unmet need in these affected patients. This clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of patisiran in patients with hATTR amyloidosis with polyneuropathy progression after LT. In this paper, we describe the PK/PD of patisiran in post-LT patients and compare it with prior patisiran studies in healthy subjects and patients without LT. In an open-label study, patients (N = 23) with hATTR amyloidosis with polyneuropathy progression after LT received 0.3 mg/kg patisiran intravenously every 3 weeks (q3w) for 12months. As a post hoc analysis, the PK and PD results from the current study were compared with prior patisiran studies in healthy volunteers from a Phase 1 study and in patients with hATTR amyloidosis without LT from Phase 2 and 3 studies. The PK profile of patisiran siRNA (ALN-18328) and its 2 lipid excipients, DLin-MC3-DMA and PEG2000-C-DMG, in hATTR amyloidosis patients after LT was consistent with prior patisiran studies in non-LT subjects. Plasma PK profiles of ALN-18328 and DLin-MC3-DMA exhibited 2 phases, the first characterized by a short distribution half-life and the second by a minor peak and relatively long elimination half-life. The plasma concentrations of PEG2000-C-DMG reached Cmax at the end of infusion and declined in a multiphasic manner. There was no appreciable accumulation at steady state. Consistent with prior studies in non-LT subjects, the post-LT patients showed a robust, and sustained TTR reduction; with median TTR reduction from baseline of 91% (average of Month 6 and Month 12). No anti-drug antibodies were observed in any patient. The consistency of patisiran PK and PD between patients with and without LT suggests that neither LT nor concomitantly administered immunosuppressants influence hepatic uptake or RNAi activity of patisiran. The patisiran dosing regimen of 0.3 mg/kg q3w is appropriate for hATTR amyloidosis patients with or without LT. NCT03862807.

Evolution of Antidrug Antibody Assays During the Development of Anti-Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor Monoclonal Antibody Marstacimab.

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) is an endogenous inhibitor of the extrinsic coagulation pathway. In patients with hemophilia A or B, inhibition of TFPI is an alternative therapeutic approach that augments the extrinsic coagulation pathway. Marstacimab is an investigational fully human monoclonal antibody that binds and neutralizes TFPI and is being evaluated as a prophylactic treatment to prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes in patients with severe hemophilia A or B, with or without inhibitors (antibodies against coagulation factors). However, the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of marstacimab may be affected by the induction of antidrug antibody (ADA) responses. Here, we describe the evolution and validation of three quasi-quantitative electrochemiluminescence-based methods to detect marstacimab ADAs, starting from their use in a first-in-human phase 1 study to their use in phase 2 and 3 clinical studies of patients with severe hemophilia. For all three methods, validation criteria evaluated the performance of the assays in screening and confirmatory cut points, precision, selectivity, drug tolerance, target interference, and stability. Additional criteria for validation were dilution linearity (Methods 1 and 2) and low positive control concentration, prozone effect, plate homogeneity, and robustness (Method 3). The three methods met validation criteria and are a potentially valuable tool in detecting the induction of marstacimab ADAs during treatment in patients with hemophilia.

Impact of switching between reference biologics and biosimilars of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

What is the impact of switching between biologics and biosimilars of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab on efficacy and safety for rheumatoid arthritis? A systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed to compare switching and non-switching groups of treatments. Pooled Risk Relative (RR) or standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs) were obtained. Seventeen randomized trials with a switching phase involving 6,562 patients were included. Results showed that a single switch from biologics to biosimilars compared to continuing biologics had comparable effects for primary and co-primary outcomes, the American College of Rheumatology criteria with 20% response (ACR20) (7 trials, 1,926 patients, RR 0.98, 95% CrIs 0.93 to 1.03) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire—Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (5 trials, 1,609 patients, SMD − 0.07, 95% CrIs − 0.23 to 0.1), and within the equivalence margins: ACR20 [RR 0.94, 1.06] and HAQ-DI [SMD − 0.22, 0.22]. The risk of treatment-emergent adverse events, discontinuation, and positive anti-drug antibodies were comparable after switching. Safety results were imprecise, and the follow-up period might not be sufficient to evaluate long-term effects, especially malignancies. Overall, the practice of single switching between approved biologics and biosimilars of Tumour Necrosis Factor inhibitors is efficacious and safe for rheumatoid arthritis.

Efficacy of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors in the treatment of various immunoinflammatory diseases: focus on immunogenicity

In clinical practice, differences in the efficacy of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (iTNF-α) have been observed in different diseases.Objective: to evaluate the efficacy of iTNF-α in patients with immune-mediated diseases and its relation to the immunogenicity of these drugs.Material and methods. The study included 70 patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) and 53 with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with infliximab (IFN), adalimumab, or certolizumab pegol (CZP). Disease activity and response to therapy were evaluated, as well as measurement of the minimal residual concentration of iTNF-α and the level of anti-drug antibodies.Results and discussion. Therapy efficacy was maintained in 60 (85.7%) patients with RD and 35 (66.0%) with IBD (odds ratio, OR 1.3; p=0.01). Event-free survival of therapy was observed more frequently in RD and was longer than in IBD (p<0.01). The incidence of treatment failure was 3.13 times higher in IBD than in RD (p<0.01). In contrast to IBD, low TNF-α levels were more common in RD patients who did not respond to treatment than in those who did (80% and 40%, respectively; OR 6.0; p<0.05). Anti-TNF-α antibodies were detected in 75% of patients with ineffective treatment with INF and CZP in the RD group and in 14.3% in the IBD group (OR 0.06; p<0.05).Conclusion. In patients with RD, the effect of iTNF-α lasted more frequently and longer than in patients with IBD. In ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis, the ineffectiveness of iTNF-α was associated with the formation of anti-drug antibodies or their low concentration in most cases, but in IBD only in half of the cases.

Adalimumab Clearance, Rather Than Trough Level, May Have Greatest Relevance to Crohn's Disease Therapeutic Outcomes Assessed Clinically and Endoscopically.

We postulated that adalimumab [ADA] drug clearance [CL] may be a more critical determinant of therapeutic outcome than ADA concentration. This was tested in Crohn's disease [CD] patients undergoing ADA maintenance treatment. CD patients from four cohorts received ADA induction and started maintenance therapy. Therapeutic outcomes consisted of endoscopic remission [ER], sustained C-reactive protein [CRP] based clinical remission [defined as CRP levels below 3 mg/L in the absence of symptoms], and faecal calprotectin [FC] level below 100 µg/g. Serum albumin, ADA concentration, and anti-drug antibody status were determined using immunochemistry and homogeneous mobility shift assay, respectively. CL was determined using a nonlinear mixed effect model with Bayesian priors. Statistical analysis consisted of Mann-Whitney test and logistic regression with calculation of odds ratio. Repeated event analysis was conducted using a nonlinear mixed effect model. In 237 enrolled patients [median age 40 years, 45% females], median CL was lower in patients achieving ER as compared with those with persistent active endoscopic disease [median 0.247 L/day vs 0.326 L/day, respectively] [p <0.01]. There was no significant difference in ADA concentration between patients in endoscopic remission compared with those with recurrence [median 9.3 µg/mL vs 11.7 µg/mL, respectively]. Sustained CRP-based clinical remission and FC levels below 100 µg/g were generally associated with lower CL and higher ADA concentration. Repeated event analysis confirmed those findings with better performances of CL than concentration in associating with ER and other outcomes. Lower ADA clearance is associated with an improved clinical outcome for patients with Crohn's disease and may be a superior pharmacokinetic measure than concentration.

Efficacy and safety of lanadelumab in Japanese patients with hereditary angioedema: A phase 3 multicenter, open-label study.

The safety and efficacy of lanadelumab for the prevention of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks have not been studied in Japanese patients. We report outcomes from a phase 3, multicenter, open-label study (NCT04180163) of lanadelumab in Japanese patients with HAE. Japanese patients with HAE aged ≥12 years with ≥1 investigator-confirmed HAE attack during the 4-week run-in baseline period were enrolled into the study and received lanadelumab 300 mg every 2 weeks subcutaneously for 52 weeks. Dosing could be reduced to 300 mg every 4 weeks during the second 26-week treatment period if patients had well-controlled symptoms (e.g., attack-free) for 6 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was no investigator-confirmed HAE attacks (attack-free status) during days 0-182. Other outcomes included the rate of investigator-confirmed HAE attacks per month (28 days) and lanadelumab safety. Twelve patients (mean ± SD age 41.9 ± 12.4 years) were enrolled. During the first 26 weeks (days 0-182), five (41.7%) patients were attack-free. The mean ± SD HAE attack rate per month decreased by 74.0%, from 3.8 ± 2.4 during baseline to 1.2 ± 2.6 during the overall 52-week treatment period. There were no deaths or discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), no severe or serious TEAEs related to lanadelumab, and no positive anti-drug antibody results. The most frequent TEAEs were injection-site reactions (37 events in six patients). Most of the injection-site reaction adverse events were mild in severity. Results of this study support the findings from two global phase 3 studies for lanadelumab use as prophylactic therapy in Japanese patients with HAE.

Recent Advancements in AAV-Vectored Immunoprophylaxis in the Nonhuman Primate Model.

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are important treatment modalities for preventing and treating infectious diseases, especially for those lacking prophylactic vaccines or effective therapies. Recent advances in mAb gene cloning from naturally infected or immunized individuals has led to the development of highly potent human mAbs against a wide range of human and animal pathogens. While effective, the serum half-lives of mAbs are quite variable, with single administrations usually resulting in short-term protection, requiring repeated doses to maintain therapeutic concentrations for extended periods of time. Moreover, due to their limited time in circulation, mAb therapies are rarely given prophylactically; instead, they are generally administered therapeutically after the onset of symptoms, thus preventing mortality, but not morbidity. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors have an established record of high-efficiency in vivo gene transfer in a variety of animal models and humans. When delivered to post-mitotic tissues such as skeletal muscle, brain, and heart, or to organs in which cells turn over slowly, such as the liver and lungs, AAV vector genomes assume the form of episomal concatemers that direct transgene expression, often for the lifetime of the cell. Based on these attributes, many research groups have explored AAV-vectored delivery of highly potent mAb genes as a strategy to enable long-term expression of therapeutic mAbs directly in vivo following intramuscular or intranasal administration. However, clinical trials in humans and studies in nonhuman primates (NHPs) indicate that while AAVs are a powerful and promising platform for vectored immunoprophylaxis (VIP), further optimization is needed to decrease anti-drug antibody (ADA) and anti-capsid antibody responses, ultimately leading to increased serum transgene expression levels and improved therapeutic efficacy. The following review will summarize the current landscape of AAV VIP in NHP models, with an emphasis on vector and transgene design as well as general delivery system optimization. In addition, major obstacles to AAV VIP, along with implications for clinical translation, will be discussed.

Predictors and optimal management of tumor necrosis factor antagonist nonresponse in inflammatory bowel disease: A literature review.

Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) antagonists, the first biologics approved for treating patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are effective for the induction and maintenance of remission and significantly improving prognosis. However, up to one-third of treated patients show primary nonresponse (PNR) to anti-TNF-α therapies, and 23%-50% of IBD patients experience loss of response (LOR) to these biologics during subsequent treatment. There is still no recognized predictor for evaluating the efficacy of anti-TNF drugs. This review summarizes the existing predictors of PNR and LOR to anti-TNF in IBD patients. Most predictors remain controversial, and only previous surgical history, disease manifestations, drug concentrations, antidrug antibodies, serum albumin, some biologic markers, and some genetic markers may be potentially predictive. In addition, we also discuss the next steps of treatment for patients with PNR or LOR to TNF antagonists. Therapeutic drug monitoring plays an important role in treatment selection. Dose escalation, combination therapy, switching to a different anti-TNF drug, or switching to a biologic with a different mechanism of action can be selected based on the concentration of the drug and/or antidrug antibodies.

Serum Concentrations of Infliximab and IL-6 for Predicting One-Year Discontinuation of Infliximab Treatment Owing to Secondary Non-response in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Secondary non-response to infliximab (IFX) occurs in some patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a useful tool to optimize IFX therapy, it is unclear whether it can help to identify the risk of secondary non-response. This study aimed to explore the utility of serum levels of IFX or other biomarkers to predict IFX discontinuation owing to secondary non-response. A single-center, retrospective study was conducted using the Kyoto University Rheumatoid Arthritis Management Alliance cohort database between 2011 and 2020. Serum IFX levels were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. An electrochemiluminescence assay was used to quantify serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 and detect anti-drug antibodies. Eighty-four out of 310 patients were eligible for this study. The cutoff levels of biomarkers were determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. IFX persistence was similar between groups stratified using IFX levels, tumor necrosis factor-α levels, interleukin-6 levels, and anti-drug antibodies positivity. The group with lower IFX and higher interleukin-6 levels had the worst therapy persistence (p = 0.017) and the most frequent disease worsening (90.0%, p < 0.001). Evaluating both interleukin-6 and IFX levels, not just IFX alone, enabled us to identify patients at risk of discontinuing IFX treatment. These findings support the utility of measuring IFX and interleukin-6 levels for successful maintenance therapy for RA.

Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease-Asian perspectives: the results of a multinational web-based survey in the 8th Asian Organization for Crohn's and Colitis meeting.

As the characteristics of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) differ between Asians and Westerners, it is necessary to determine adequate therapeutic strategy for Asian IBD patients. We evaluated the current treatment of IBD in Asian countries/regions using a web-based survey. The Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases conducted a multinational web-based survey for current IBD care in Asia between September 16, 2020, and November 13, 2020. A total of 384 doctors treating IBD patients from 24 Asian countries/regions responded to the survey. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, anti-integrins, and anti-interleukin-12/23 agents were available for use by 93.8%, 72.1%, and 70.1% of respondents in Asian countries/regions. Compared with a previous survey performed in 2014, an increased tendency for treatment with biologics, including anti-TNF agents, was observed. In the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis, 72.1% of respondents chose anti-TNF agents, followed by tacrolimus (11.7%). In the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory Crohn's disease, 90.4% chose anti-TNF agents, followed by thiopurines (53.1%), anti-interleukin-12/23 agents (39.3%), and anti-integrin agents (35.7%). In the treatment of Crohn's disease patients refractory to anti-TNF agents, the most preferred strategy was to measure serum levels of anti-TNF and anti-drug antibodies (40.9%), followed by empiric dose escalation or shortening of dosing intervals (25.3%). Although there were some differences, treatment strategies for patients with IBD were mostly similar among Asian doctors. Based on the therapeutic outcomes, it is necessary to identify the most appropriate therapeutic strategy for Asian IBD patients.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of half-life extended SARS-CoV-2–neutralizing monoclonal antibodies AZD7442 (tixagevimab/cilgavimab) in healthy Japanese adults

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of AZD7442 (tixagevimab/cilgavimab) in healthy Japanese adults. MethodsIn this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 study, AZD7442 was administered intramuscularly (300 or 600 mg) or intravenously (300 or 1000 mg) to healthy Japanese adults. Primary endpoints were safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. Anti-drug antibodies and neutralizing antibody activities were secondary endpoints. ResultsA total of 40 participants were randomized to receive AZD7442 (n = 30) or placebo (n = 10). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 12 (40%) and 3 (30%) participants, respectively; there were no deaths, serious AEs, or AEs leading to study withdrawal. Tixagevimab and cilgavimab had mean half-lives of 82.1–95.9 and 77.9–92.0 days, respectively, which were generally similar regardless of administration route. SARS-CoV-2–neutralizing antibody titers were >4-fold higher than baseline levels from Day 8 to Day 211 in participants receiving AZD7442. ConclusionsAZD7442 was well tolerated in healthy Japanese adults, with predictable pharmacokinetics and an extended half-life, consistent with previous studies.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04896541.

Reduced Graphene Oxide Electrolyte-Gated Transistor Immunosensor with Highly Selective Multiparametric Detection of Anti-Drug Antibodies.

The advent of immunotherapies with biological drugs has revolutionized the treatment of cancers and auto-immune diseases. However, in some patients the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) hampers the drug efficacy. The concentration of ADAs is typically in the range of 1-10 pM, hence their immunodetection is challenging. We focus here on ADAs towards Infliximab (IFX), a drug used to treat rheumatoid arthritis and other auto-immune diseases. We report an ambipolar electrolyte-gated transistor (EGT) immunosensor based on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) channel and IFX bound to the gate electrode as the specific probe. The rGO-EGTs are easy to fabricate, exhibit low voltage operations (≤ 0.3V), a robust response within 15min, and ultra-high sensitivity (10 aM limit of detection). We propose a multiparametric analysis of the whole rGO-EGT transfer curves based on the type-I generalized extreme value distribution. We demonstrate that it allows us to selectively quantify ADAs also in the co-presence of its antagonist tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), the natural circulating target of IFX. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

DEVELOPMENT OF A METHOD FOR PRODUCING FAB/F(AB’)2 FRAGMENTS FROM A FULL-LENGTH MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY FOR BIOANALYTICAL ASSAYS

Abstract Background Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) comprise of two Fab fragments and one Fc fragment or one F(ab)’2 fragment and one Fc fragment. While a full-length mAb is frequently used as an assay reagent for bioanalysis, mAb fragments are required in certain cases. For example, to build a sandwich assay for detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) for therapeutic antibodies, Fab or F(ab)’2 fragment is used instead of a full-length mAb as capture reagent. This is because therapeutic antibodies, either humanized or fully human, are in many ways indistinguishable from the ADA generated in patients, especially in Fc fragment. When ADA detection methods utilizes anti-human Fc antibodies as the detection reagent, the full-length mAb drug will be directly bound by the detection reagent, causing interference. Preparation of a Fab or F(ab)’2 fragment is therefore needed. Methods and results We are developing a method for enzymatic digestion of therapeutic antibodies to generate monovalent Fab or bivalent F(ab’)2 fragments in this study. With such reagents becoming available, a sandwich ADA assay formats can be expanded to allow anti-human Fc antibodies as detection regents. To standardize the method, we explored various enzymatic conditions, including type of enzymes (i.e., pepsin, papain, and IdeS Protease), digestion-time (1, 2, 4, and 6 h), enzyme to antibody ratio (1:10, 1:20, and 1:40 w/w), IgG species and isotypes (human IgG1-κ, IgG1-λ, and IgG4-κ). The enzymatic hydrolysates were quantified by NanoDrop and purified by dialysis (10K MWCO) and Protein A/G/L magnetic bead methods. The effective recovery of truncated antibodies was &amp;gt; 90%, as assessed by reduced/non-reduced SDS-PAGE and ELISA analysis. Digestion of human IgG1 and IgG4 with pepsin resulted into a complete cleavage into F(ab')2 fragments and degradation of Fc fragments. While IdeS Protease produced an equivalent quantity of F(ab’)2 and Fc fragments with a similar efficiency, removal of the intact Fc fragment was required as an additional step. If the Fab fragments were desired, papain could be used with yield being over 90%. We have subsequently utilized either Fab or F(ab’)2 as a capture reagent for ADA detection. Conclusion We have successfully developed the enzymatic digestion method to prepare Fab or F(ab’)2 fragments. The optimized conditions described here are broadly applicable to different IgG isotypes across many therapeutic antibodies.

A Monovalent Fab Affinity-Capture and Elution Bridging Immunoassay Overcomes Rheumatoid Factor Interference while Accurately Detecting Antidrug Antibodies.

Rheumatoid factor (RF) consists of autoantibodies that bind the fragment crystallizable (Fc) region of human immunoglobulin G (IgG) and present in sera of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Immunoassays to detect antidrug antibodies (ADA) in RA patient samples may experience interference due to RF binding and crosslinking Fc regions of the capture and detection antibody reagents. To overcome this interference, a novel Fab affinity-capture and elution (ACE)-bridging immunoassay (Fab ACE-Bridge) was developed with monovalent-recombinant Fab to avoid RF interference. ACE and ACE-Bridge assays were developed to detect ADA against a therapeutic monoclonal antibody using samples from healthy donors, psoriasis patients, and RA patients. The performance of these assays was compared to a novel Fab ACE-Bridge assay, in which monoclonal antibody was replaced with monovalent Fab. High screening signals in the ACE and ACE-Bridge assays were detected in RA patient samples but not in samples from healthy donors or psoriasis patients. The high screening signals in RA samples did not inhibit to the expected extent in the confirmatory assay, a consistent feature of false-positive screening results. Further investigation revealed RF as the interferent affecting assay performance. Modification of the ACE-Bridge assay by using monovalent Fab eliminated RF interference while allowing for sensitive and drug-tolerant detection of authentic ADA. RF interfered significantly in traditional ACE and ACE-Bridge assays. Implementation of a novel monovalent Fab ACE-Bridge assay overcame RF interference. The use of monovalent Fab is recommended for immunogenicity assays when assessing ADA in RA patient samples.

Long-term Prophylaxis Against Aerosolized Marburg Virus in Nonhuman Primates With an Afucosylated Monoclonal Antibody.

Marburg virus (MARV) causes a hemorrhagic fever disease in human and nonhuman primates with high levels of morbidity and mortality. Concerns about weaponization of aerosolized MARV have spurred the development of nonhuman primate (NHP) models of aerosol exposure. To address the potential threat of aerosol exposure, a monoclonal antibody that binds MARV glycoprotein was tested, MR186YTE, for its efficacy as a prophylactic. MR186YTE was administered intramuscularly to NHPs at 15 or 5 mg/kg 1 month prior to MARV aerosol challenge. Seventy-five percent (3/4) of the 15 mg/kg dose group and 50% (2/4) of the 5 mg/kg dose group survived. Serum analyses showed that the NHP dosed with 15 mg/kg that succumbed to infection developed an antidrug antibody response and therefore had no detectable MR186YTE at the time of challenge. These results suggest that intramuscular dosing of mAbs may be a clinically useful prophylaxis for MARV aerosol exposure.

Response to Biologic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Antidrug Antibodies

There are conflicting data on the association of antidrug antibodies with response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To analyze the association of antidrug antibodies with response to treatment for RA. This cohort study analyzed data from the ABI-RA (Anti-Biopharmaceutical Immunization: Prediction and Analysis of Clinical Relevance to Minimize the Risk of Immunization in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients) multicentric, open, prospective study of patients with RA from 27 recruiting centers in 4 European countries (France, Italy, the Netherlands, and the UK). Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had RA diagnosis, and were initiating a new bDMARD. Recruitment spanned from March 3, 2014, to June 21, 2016. The study was completed in June 2018, and data were analyzed in June 2022. Patients were treated with a new bDMARD: adalimumab, infliximab (grouped as anti-tumor necrosis factor [TNF] monoclonal antibodies [mAbs]), etanercept, tocilizumab, and rituximab according to the choice of the treating physician. The primary outcome was the association of antidrug antibody positivity with EULAR (European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology; formerly, European League Against Rheumatism) response to treatment at month 12 assessed through univariate logistic regression. The secondary end points were the EULAR response at month 6 and at visits from month 6 to months 15 to 18 using generalized estimating equation models. Detection of antidrug antibody serum levels was performed at months 1, 3, 6, 12, and 15 to 18 using electrochemiluminescence (Meso Scale Discovery) and drug concentration for anti-TNF mAbs, and etanercept in the serum was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Of the 254 patients recruited, 230 (mean [SD] age, 54.3 [13.7] years; 177 females [77.0%]) were analyzed. At month 12, antidrug antibody positivity was 38.2% in patients who were treated with anti-TNF mAbs, 6.1% with etanercept, 50.0% with rituximab, and 20.0% with tocilizumab. There was an inverse association between antidrug antibody positivity (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.38; P < .001) directed against all biologic drugs and EULAR response at month 12. Analyzing all the visits starting at month 6 using generalized estimating equation models confirmed the inverse association between antidrug antibody positivity and EULAR response (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18-0.65; P < .001). A similar association was found for tocilizumab alone (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.83; P = .03). In the multivariable analysis, antidrug antibodies, body mass index, and rheumatoid factor were independently inversely associated with response to treatment. There was a significantly higher drug concentration of anti-TNF mAbs in patients with antidrug antibody-negative vs antidrug antibody-positive status (mean difference, -9.6 [95% CI, -12.4 to -6.9] mg/L; P < 001). Drug concentrations of etanercept (mean difference, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.2-1.2] mg/L; P = .005) and adalimumab (mean difference, 1.8 [95% CI, 0.4-3.2] mg/L; P = .01) were lower in nonresponders vs responders. Methotrexate comedication at baseline was inversely associated with antidrug antibodies (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.25-1.00; P = .05). Results of this prospective cohort study suggest an association between antidrug antibodies and nonresponse to bDMARDs in patients with RA. Monitoring antidrug antibodies could be considered in the treatment of these patients, particularly nonresponders to biologic RA drugs.

Modeling immunogenecity data to establish screening bioassays cut point.

The response of immunogenecity anti-drug antibody (ADA) generally includes biological and analytical variability. The nature of biological and analytical variations may lead to a variety of symmetric and asymmetric ADA data. As a result, current statistical methods may yield unreliable results because these methods assume special types of symmetric or asymmetric ADA data. In this paper, we survey and compare parametric models that are useful for analyzing a variety of asymmetric data that have rarely been used to calculate assay cut points. These models include symmetric distributions as limiting case; therefore, they are useful in the analysis of a variety of symmetric data. We also investigate two nonparametric approaches that have received little attention in screening cut point calculations. A simulation study was conducted to compare the performance of the methods. We evaluate the methods using four published different types of data, and make recommendations concerning the use of the methods.

Clinical efficacy and nocebo effect following non-medical biosimilar switch in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A prospective observational study

BackgroundWe aimed to evaluate clinical efficacy, biomarker activity, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), adverse events (AEs), and nocebo effect in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who underwent non-medical biosimilar switching. MethodsA prospective observational study of consecutive IBD patients who underwent biosimilar switch. Disease activity, biomarkers, TDM, and AEs, including the nocebo effect were captured 8 weeks before switch, at the time of switch (baseline),12 and 24 weeks after the switch. Results210 patients were included [81.4% had Crohn's disease (CD), the median age at inclusion: 42 years (IQR 29–61)]. There was no significant difference in the rates of clinical remission at week 8 before switch, baseline, week12, and 24 after switch: 89.0%,93.4%,86.3%,and 90.8%,p = 0.129. The biomarker remission rates were not significantly different; CRP:81.3%,74.7%,81.2%,73.0%,p = 0.343; fecal calprotectin: 78.3%,74.5%,71.7%,76.3%,p = 0.829. The rates of maintaining therapeutic levels (84.7%,83.9%,83.0%,85.3%,p = 0.597) and prevalence of positive anti-drug antibodies remained unchanged. Drug persistence at 12 week of switch was 97.1%, regardless of disease phenotype and originator. The nocebo effect was observed in 13.3%. The discontinuation rate was 4.8%. ConclusionDespite a significant number of early nocebo complaints within the first 6 months after the biosimilar switch, no significant changes were found in clinical efficacy, biomarkers, therapeutic drug level, or anti-drug antibodies.

Characterization of Anti-Emicizumab Antibodies Using Repository Samples Obtained in Clinical Studies of Emicizumab Conducted in Japan.

Emicizumab, a factor (F) VIII function-mimetic bispecific antibody, is used for the treatment with patients with hemophilia A (PwHA). Although the immunogenicity of emicizumab is low, potential of immunogenicity is still remained. Despite some cases of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) reported, the characteristics of ADAs have not been fully elucidated. In this research, we evaluated the characteristics of ADAs by using repository samples collected in phase 1, phase 1/2 and bioavailability studies conducted in Japan. Ten plasma/serum samples from 6 healthy volunteers (HVs) and 4 PwHA who tested positive for ADAs in the clinical studies were used for the assessment of neutralizing activity, epitope analysis and pharmacokinetics (PK). Neutralizing activity of ADAs was observed in 3 HVs and 1 PwHA. Among these, 3 HVs developed ADAs which bound to the complement-determining region (CDR)1, 3 of the common light chain (cLC) of emicizumab and associated with shorter half-life. Epitopes of ADAs in 1 PwHA were on the Fab-regions of emicizumab, and the ADAs were not associated with decreased exposure in this PwHA. Neutralizing activity was undetectable in 3 HVs and 3 PwHA. Among these, ADAs in 2 HVs and 2 PwHA recognized the Fab-regions or the CDR 1, 3 of the cLC, and 1 of these 2 HVs showed shorter half-life of emicizumab. In conclusion, our analysis of ADAs demonstrated the various characteristics of ADAs, such as ADAs with either neutralizing activity or affected pharmacokinetics, or both properties.