Antimicrobial Stewardship Team Research Articles

Evaluating a virtual facilitation workshop with antimicrobial stewardship teams within a cluster randomized stepped-wedge trial

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) often function naturally as facilitators within clinical hospital settings, by working with individuals and teams to reduce unnecessary antibiotics. Within implementation science, facilitation has been studied and evaluated as an implementation strategy that can accelerate and improve fidelity to implementation efforts. This study describes a novel, virtual facilitation strategy developed and served as an intervention within the optimizing perioperative antibiotics for children trial (OPERATIC trial). This paper: (1) describes ASP team’s preferences for and use of a facilitation workshop and (2) describes sustained use of facilitation skills throughout the study period.MethodsStudy participants included antimicrobial stewardship team members from the nine children’s hospitals that participated in this study and completed facilitation training. All individuals who completed facilitation training were asked to evaluate the training through an online survey. Additionally, site leads were interviewed by the site coordinator every other month and asked about their team’s use of facilitation skills throughout the rest of the study period. Survey data were managed and coded in R, and qualitative interview data were analyzed using rapid methodology.Results30 individuals, including both physicians and pharmacists, completed the evaluation. Individuals largely rated themselves as novice facilitators (53%). Individuals reported satisfaction with virtual facilitation and identified different components of the workshops as valuable. An additional 108 interviews were performed throughout the study period. These interviews found that facilitators reported using all skills throughout the study period and described varied use of skills over time. All nine sites applied facilitation strategies, team building techniques, and communication/conflict skills at some point during the intervention phase.ConclusionWe describe the use of virtual facilitation as an acceptable and appropriate strategy to enhance facilitation skills for ASP teams working to reduce unnecessary postoperative antibiotics. Participants reported different useful components of facilitation training and described using differing facilitation skills throughout the trial. Overall, the use of facilitation skills continued throughout the duration of the study period. This paper outlines how facilitation training can be conducted virtually in a way that is feasible and acceptable to clinicians.Trial registrationNCT04366440, April 24, 2020.

Antibiotic spectrum coverage scoring as a potential metric for evaluating the antimicrobial stewardship team activity: a single-center study.

Days of antibiotic spectrum coverage (days of ASC: DASC) is a metric for antibiotic usage calculated by ASC scores for spectrum and addresses limitations of days of therapy (DOT), which does not include spectrum. This study aims to investigate whether ASC-related metrics offer different aspects compared to aggregated DOT for all antibiotics (DOTtotal) and to assess their correlation in evaluating the impact of antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) programs. Retrospective. A single center within an 845-bed hospital. Trends in DOTtotal, DASC, and the DASC/DOT ratio, representing the average spectrum coverage per therapy day, were analyzed pre- and post-AST programs (April 2018) from January 2015 to December 2023, using interrupted time series analysis. Independent of the DASC/DOT, we also advocated ASC-stratified DOT (ASDOT), which facilitates comprehensive evaluation of DOT across ASC scores of <6, 6-10, and >10, representing narrow-, intermediate-, and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Among inpatients, AST programs significantly moderated the increasing trends of these metrics. Specifically, although the rates of increase in DOTtotal and DASC were slowed or plateaued, the DASC/DOT ratio decreased (P < 0.001). ASDOT metrics revealed a decrease and subsequent plateau in DOTtotal for the broad- and intermediate-spectrum antibiotics, with an increase observed for the narrow-spectrum antibiotics (P < 0.001 for each). DASC did not provide additional insights in the outpatient's population. The study demonstrates that ASC-related metrics may yield different and useful conclusions about the effectiveness of AST programs for inpatients.

Getting rapid diagnostic test data into the appropriate hands by leveraging pharmacy staff and a clinical surveillance platform: a case study from a US community hospital

Abstract Objectives To outline the procedural implementation and optimization of rapid diagnostic test (RDT) results for bloodstream infections (BSIs) and to evaluate the combination of RDTs with real-time antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) support plus clinical surveillance platform (CSP) software on time to appropriate therapy in BSIs at a single health system. Methods Blood culture reporting and communication were reported for four time periods: (i) a pre-BCID [BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel] implementation period that consisted of literature review and blood culture notification procedure revision; (ii) a BCID implementation period that consisted of BCID implementation, real-time results notification via CSP, and creation of a treatment algorithm; (iii) a post-BCID implementation period; and (iv) a BCID2 implementation period. Time to appropriate therapy metrics was reported for the BCID2 time period. Results The mean time from BCID2 result to administration of effective antibiotics was 1.2 h (range 0–7.9 h) and time to optimal therapy was 7.6 h (range 0–113.8 h) during the BCID2 Panel implementation period. When comparing time to optimal antibiotic administration among patients growing ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales, the BCID2 Panel group (mean 2.8 h) was significantly faster than the post-BCID Panel group (17.7 h; P = 0.0041). Conclusions Challenges exist in communicating results to the appropriate personnel on the healthcare team who have the knowledge to act on these data and prescribe targeted therapy against the pathogen(s) identified. In this report, we outline the procedures for telephonic communication and CSP support that were implemented at our health system to distribute RDT data to individuals capable of assessing results, enabling timely optimization of antimicrobial therapy.

Health system interventions and responses to anti-microbial resistance: A scoping review of evidence from 15 African countries.

The global rise in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is claiming the lives of more than 1.2 million people each year. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) this global health crisis is particularly acute in Africa, largely due to fragile and underfunded health systems. Efforts to combat this public health threat have led to the implementation of health system interventions worldwide aimed at managing and containing the spread of AMR. However, the literature on the real time impacts and the barriers that hinder the implementation of these interventions in the African context is limited. The objective of this scoping review was to identify AMR interventions in African health systems, their impact, and the challenges of the implementation. Drawing on Muka and colleague's 24 step approach for scoping reviews, two major public health databases (PubMed and Global Health) were searched for articles in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines resulting in 4,783 records. Screening and retrieval of articles was done using Rayyan software based on specified inclusion criteria and 36 articles included in the final list. These articles were synthesized after extracting specific data on AMR interventions and their impact on African health systems. The review identified four broad impacts of AMR interventions including 1. Reduction in antibiotics use, 2. Increased adherence to guidelines and protocols, 3. Enhanced laboratory-based AMR surveillance, 4. Development of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) Action Plans and Teams. However, challenges such as poor laboratory infrastructure, logistical challenges, poor financial commitment and inadequate education and training were identified as challenges impeding the successful implementation of AMR interventions in Africa. Our findings reveal a range of successful AMR interventions in African health systems although infrastructural and financial challenges remain. Better standardization and reporting of AMR diagnosis while leveraging the available information is needed to improve the optimization of treatment guidelines across Africa.

The imperative of teamwork in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions: insights from an ethnographic study with practitioners in Spain.

Teamwork-the activity of working together in a group towards a similar goal-is a defining feature of the practice of clinical medicine carried out in hospitals and other healthcare facilities. This Viewpoint suggests that teamwork is a defining feature of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes, and identifies six elements that characterise AMS team dynamics. These insights arise from an original ethnographic study of AMS carried out in Spain, where these programmes are known as Programas para la Optimización de Antimicrobianos. The study used qualitative research methods including ethnographic observations in public hospitals and scientific and educational fora, in-depth interviews and archival research. It calls for a reflection on the part of the global community of AMS practitioners on the role of team dynamics in building sustainable AMS interventions and the inclusion of teamwork skills in training curricula aimed at future practitioners.

Combination of a Rapid Diagnostic Assay and Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention for Gram-Negative Bacteremia.

Traditional blood cultures for gram-negative bacteremia can take up to 72 hours or more to return results, prolonging the duration of empiric broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics. The Accelerate Pheno system provides rapid identification and susceptibilities for blood cultures in gram-negative bacteremia. Current data on its clinical utility are mixed overall, so the system requires further research. A multicenter, retrospective quasi-experimental study was conducted comparing the Accelerate Pheno rapid diagnostic system with antimicrobial stewardship intervention and traditional blood cultures alone. A total of 264 patients with blood cultures with gram-negative bacteria growth were included in the final analysis (102 pre-intervention, 162 post-intervention). The antimicrobial stewardship team made 364 recommendations in 152/162 (93.8%) patients in the post group. Duration of intravenous therapy was shorter (P < .001) for the post-intervention group (median, 4.0 days) compared with the pre-intervention group (median, 7.5 days). Hospital length of stay was also shorter (P < .001) for the post-intervention group (median, 5.1 days) compared with the pre-intervention group (median, 7.0 days). Readmission rates within 30 days were reduced (P = .042) post-intervention (13.0%) compared with pre-intervention (22.6%). In the post-intervention group, a larger proportion of patients were transitioned to oral therapy at any point (126/162, 77.8%) compared with pre-intervention (62/102, 60.8%; P < .001). These results suggest that the Accelerate Pheno system, with active review and intervention by a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team, is a useful tool in improving both patient-centric and antimicrobial stewardship outcomes.

European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases/European Committee on infection control clinical guidelines on pre-operative decolonization and targeted prophylaxis in patients colonized by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria before surgery

ScopeThe aim of these guidelines is to provide recommendations for decolonization and perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria (MDR-GPB) adult carriers before inpatient surgery. MethodsThese European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases/European Committee on Infection Control guidelines were developed following a systematic review of published studies targeting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci, and pan-drug-resistant-GPB. Critical outcomes were the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs) caused by the colonizing MDR-GPB and SSIs-attributable mortality. Important outcomes included the occurrence of SSIs caused by any pathogen, hospital-acquired infections, all-cause mortality, and adverse events associated with the interventions, including resistance development to the agents used and the incidence of Clostridioides difficile infections. The last search of all databases was performed on 1 November 2023. The level of evidence and the strength of each recommendation were defined according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Consensus of a multidisciplinary expert panel was reached for the final list of recommendations. Antimicrobial stewardship considerations were included. RecommendationsThe guideline panel reviewed the impact of decolonization, targeted PAP, and combined interventions (e.g. decolonization and targeted PAP) on the risk of SSIs and other outcomes in MDR-GPB carriers, according to the type of bacteria and type of surgery.We recommend screening for S. aureus before high-risk operations, such as cardiothoracic and orthopaedic surgery. Decolonization with intranasal mupirocin with or without a chlorhexidine bath is recommended in patients colonized with S. aureus before cardiothoracic and orthopaedic surgery and suggested in other surgeries. The addition of vancomycin to standard prophylaxis is suggested for MRSA carriers in cardiothoracic surgery, orthopaedic surgery, and neurosurgery. Combined interventions (e.g. decolonization and targeted prophylaxis) are suggested for MRSA carriers undergoing cardiothoracic and orthopaedic surgery. No recommendation could be made regarding screening, decolonization and targeted prophylaxis for vancomycin-resistant enterococci because of the lack of data. No evidence was retrieved for methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci and pan-drug-resistant-GPB. Careful consideration of the laboratory workload and involvement of antimicrobial stewardship and infection control teams are warranted before implementing screening procedures or performing changes in PAP policy. Future research should focus on novel decolonizing techniques, on the monitoring of resistance to decolonizing agents and PAP regimens, and on standardized combined interventions in high-quality studies.

P04 Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis adherence: before and after antimicrobial stewardship team impact in a south Indian secondary care hospital

P04 Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis adherence: before and after antimicrobial stewardship team impact in a south Indian secondary care hospital

Implementation of a Microbiological Surveillance Protocol in a Portuguese Tertiary Care Academic Endoscopy Unit

Introduction: International societies recommend microbiological surveillance of endoscopes to reduce the incidence of endoscope-associated infections, particularly for duodenoscopes. However, surveillance protocols are not internationally standardized, both regarding sample collection, processing, and culture. This study aims to provide a framework protocol encompassing the experience of a tertiary large volume endoscopy center and the microbiology laboratory for collecting and culturing of endoscope samples for microbiological surveillance. Methods: A sample collection and processing protocol was designed as a result of a cooperation between the Endoscopy Center of the Gastroenterology Department and the Microbiology Laboratory of the Department of Clinical Pathology. This protocol reflects international recommendations in this topic and the human and technological resources of the involved departments. Results: The established protocol for collecting samples varies according to the type and model of endoscope. The specimens are collected as sterile saline liquid samples, as well as swabs (with and without transport media). Together with the collection of samples from the endoscope, samples from the final rinse water as well as the water bottle are also collected. For duodenoscopes and curvilinear echoendoscopes, we perform microbiological surveillance every 3 months; for gastroscopes and colonoscopes, at least, once a year; and for specific endoscopes, such as the pediatric or dual-channel therapeutic endoscopes, enteroscopes, or radial echoendoscopes, every 6 months. Conclusion: Endoscopy units should have detailed protocols for microbiological surveillance of endoscopes. These protocols should be drawn up by a multidisciplinary team that includes endoscopy nurses, gastroenterologists, microbiologists, and the antimicrobial stewardship team, following international recommendations, adapted to each institution resources.

Assessment of antimicrobial stewardship programmes and antibiotic use among children admitted to two hospitals in Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional study

IntroductionAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global public health concern and irrational use of antibiotics in hospitals is a key driver of AMR. Even though it is not preventable, antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes will reduce or slow it down. Research evidence from Sierra Leone has demonstrated the high use of antibiotics in hospitals, but no study has assessed hospital AMS programmes and antibiotic use specifically among children. We conducted the first-ever study to assess the AMS programmes and antibiotics use in two tertiary hospitals in Sierra Leone.MethodsThis was a hospital-based cross-sectional survey using the World Health Organization (WHO) point prevalence survey (PPS) methodology. Data was collected from the medical records of eligible patients at the Ola During Children’s Hospital (ODCH) and Makeni Regional Hospital (MRH) using the WHO PPS hospital questionnaire; and required data collection forms. The prescribed antibiotics were classified according to the WHO Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) classification. Ethics approval was obtained from the Sierra Leone Ethics and Scientific Review Committee. Statistical analysis was conducted using the SPSS version 22.ResultsBoth ODCH and MRH did not have the required AMS infrastructure; policy and practice; and monitoring and feedback mechanisms to ensure rational antibiotic prescribing. Of the 150 patients included in the survey, 116 (77.3%) were admitted at ODCH and 34 (22.7%) to MRH, 77 (51.3%) were males and 73 (48.7%) were females. The mean age was 2 years (SD=3.5). The overall prevalence of antibiotic use was 84.7% (95% CI: 77.9% – 90.0%) and 77 (83.8%) of the children aged less than one year received an antibiotic. The proportion of males that received antibiotics was higher than that of females. Most (58, 47.2 %) of the patients received at least two antibiotics. The top five antibiotics prescribed were gentamycin (100, 27.4%), ceftriaxone (76, 20.3%), ampicillin (71, 19.5%), metronidazole (44, 12.1%), and cefotaxime (31, 8.5%). Community-acquired infections were the primary diagnoses for antibiotic prescription.ConclusionThe non-existence of AMS programmes might have contributed to the high use of antibiotics at ODCH and MRH. This has the potential to increase antibiotic selection pressure and in turn the AMR burden in the country. There is need to establish hospital AMS teams and train health workers on the rational use of antibiotics.

Rationalizing irrational prescribing-infection-related attitudes and practices across paediatric surgery specialties in a hospital in South India.

Antibiotic use in paediatric surgical specialties is understudied. We investigated the antibiotic prescribing practices of paediatric general and cardiovascular surgical teams in a tertiary hospital in South India. Mixed-methods study including observations from ward rounds, semi-structured interviews, and review of antibiotic prescribing. Field notes from observations and interview transcripts were coded using NVivo and thematically analysed. Data collection and analysis were iterative and continued until thematic saturation. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Data included 62 h of observation, 24 interviews, one case study and 200 patient chart reviews (100/specialty). Senior surgeons make key decisions, referring to their own experience when prescribing antibiotics. Being outcome-driven, the doctors often prescribe antibiotics at the earliest indication of infection with a reluctance to de-escalate, even when an infection is not diagnosed. This practice is more acute among surgeons who consider themselves responsible for their patients' health and attribute the consistently low surgical site infection rates to this practice.In general surgery, 83.3% (80/96; 4 lost to follow-up) of patients were prescribed antibiotics for the duration of their stay with oral antibiotics prescribed at discharge. The surgeons use antibiotics prophylactically for patients who may be vulnerable to infection. The antimicrobial stewardship team was considered to have limited influence in the decision-making process. Outcome-driven decision-making in surgery leads to overprescription of antibiotics and prolonged surgical prophylaxis. The rationale for suboptimal practices is complicated by the surgeons' beliefs about the contextual determinants of health in India.

Survey of Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention Practitioners on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Experiences

Background: Incorporating diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice into healthcare ensures equitable opportunity to achieve optimal health. Infectious diseases, antimicrobial stewardship, and infection prevention teams rely on consultative recommendations to improve patient care which may be influenced by implicit and explicit biases of the recipient treatment teams. Little is known about how race, ethnicity, and other characteristics impact stewardship and infection control recommendations. Methods: A survey of infectious diseases, antimicrobial stewardship, and infection prevention practitioners was developed through the Society of Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Antimicrobial Stewardship Committee. The survey was sent electronically to members of the SHEA Research Network and was promoted to attendees of two sessions at IDWeek 2022 and SHEA Spring 2023. Survey questions included demographics, awareness of (and participation in) unconscious bias and microaggression training at their institutions, antibiotic prescribing bias observations, and perceptions of how race, ethnicity, and other characteristics have influenced participants' antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention recommendations. Descriptive statistics were performed using SAS V.9.4 . Results: Among 175 survey respondents, 75% (n=129) were White, 16% (n=27) were Asian, 4% (n=7) were Black, 85% (n=150) were non-Hispanic, 5% (n=8) were Hispanic, and 3% (n=5) reported ethnicity as multiethnic. 76% of respondents identified as female, and 2% as non-binary or gender-fluid. 29% of respondents had a medical degree, 12% had a nursing degree, 7% had a pharmacy degree, and 52% had a degree listed as other (7% had a PhD, 23% had an MPH/MSPH degree, and 15% had an MS degree). 65% and 49% of respondents had participated in unconscious bias and microaggression training, respectively. 18% (n=22) of White respondents, 43% (n=3) of Black respondents, and 30% (n=8) of Asian respondents reported witnessing antimicrobial prescribing influenced by race, ethnicity, or other characteristics. 17% and 15% of respondents felt that their antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention recommendations, respectively, had not been accepted due to their race, ethnicity, gender identity, or other personal identifiers. Conclusion: This survey showed demographic characteristics of professionals working in infectious diseases and their perceptions of how certain aspects of their identity have influenced their recommendations. Differences between racial groups were observed in how frequently respondents witnessed inequities in antimicrobial prescribing, and many respondents felt their recommendations had not been accepted due to their identity. A limitation of this analysis is that few Black individuals completed the survey, which makes comparisons by race difficult; however, the respondents were consistent with SHEA membership demographics.

From Swiffers to Solutions: The Impact of Environmental Sampling in the Veterinary Medical Center at OSU

Background: In 2018, the Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine (OSU CVM) implemented an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, central to which was the integration of an environmental surveillance (ES) program. The ES focuses on pathogens recognized as urgent threats to public health by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The pathogens currently targeted include carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), Salmonella spp., methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. (MRSs), vancomycin resistant Enterococcus spp., and enrofloxacin resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Identification of these pathogens allows the hospital to be aware of the local environmental microflora which can act as a sentinel for disease in the hospital, potentially causing healthcare associated infections. Therefore, the objective of this program is to identify resistant bacterial pathogens, characterize their resistance profiles, analyze prevalence patterns, and initiate infection control interventions where needed in the OSU VMC. Method: From January 2018 through December 2023, a total of 5449 samples were collected from approximately 86 locations across the OSU VMC encompassing the small animal, equine, and farm animal sections. A majority (64%, n=3561) of samples were collected from the small animal hospital, with the farm animal section contributing 1055 samples and the equine section 899. Areas sampled were frequented by both humans and animals, as well as surfaces exclusively touched by humans. Samples were collected using Swiffers® and processed through selective culture media. Result: Approximately half (52%, n=2890) of the samples collected represented human-touch only surfaces. A total of 3794 bacterial isolates were recovered, with an overall low prevalence for all targeted pathogens. Prevalence of CPE was 2% (n=103), with Enterobacter species being the most common. Recovery of MRSs was 8.5% (n=464) and Salmonella species was 1% (n=47). Conclusion: Through this initiative, the equine division of the OSU VMC collaborated with the antimicrobial stewardship team to enhance their Salmonella fecal and ES practices. In 2019, ES was critical in identifying persistent CPE and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the ICU and surrounding areas of the small animal hospital. Effective measures were taken to halt the spread of ESC among patients and eliminate CPE in the environment. With the discovery of a new CPE in early 2023 in the small animal ICU and nearby areas, the program initiated targeted ES and cleaning and disinfection protocols, to identify contaminated areas and control disease transmission. These efforts have increased patient safety, health, and well-being, demonstrating how ES can be an important tool for infection control and prevention in veterinary settings.

Budget Impact Analysis for the Spread and Financial Sustainability of Videoconference Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs

Background: In rural areas, antimicrobial stewardship programs often have limited access to infectious disease (ID) expertise. Videoconference Antimicrobial Stewardship Teams (VASTs) pair rural Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers with an ID expert to discuss treatment of patients with concerns for infection. In a pilot study, VASTs were effective at improving antimicrobial use. Here, we evaluated 12-month operating costs for staffing for 3 VASTs. Methods: We used the following data to describe 12 months of clinical encounters for 3 VASTs operating from January 2022 – March 2023: the number of VAST sessions completed and clinical encounters; Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes associated with clinical encounters; session attendees (by role) and the time spent (percent effort) on VAST-related activities. The annual operating cost was based on the annual salaries and percent effort of VAST attendees. We used these characteristics combined with private-sector and Medicare reimbursements to evaluate the cost of implementation and number of clinical encounters needed to offset those costs (breakeven) for each site. Results: Three VASTs recorded 229 clinical encounters during 117 sessions (Table 1). Based on CPT codes, the approximate revenue per patient was $516.46. Site A, the only site to break even, had the most sessions and clinical encounters as well as the lowest operating costs. For Site B, a slight increase in the clinical encounters, which might be achieved by 3 additional VAST sessions, would help achieve breakeven. For Site C, increasing the number of clinical encounters to 3-4 per session would have helped their VAST break even without requiring a decrease in operating costs. Conclusions: The frequency of VAST sessions, volume of clinical encounters, and low operating costs all contributed the VAST at Site A achieving a financial break-even point within 12 months. Consideration of the potential number of clinical encounters and sessions will help other VASTs achieve financial sustainment, independent of cost-savings related to potential decreases in expenditures for antibiotics and antibiotic-related adverse events. These results also provide insight into possible adoption and diffusion of VAST-like programs in the Medicare hospital setting.

The impact of meropenem shortage and post-prescription review and feedback on broad-spectrum antimicrobial use: An interrupted time-series analysis

Meropenem (MEPM) holds significance in treating severe infections and drug-resistant bacteria. There are concerns that antimicrobial shortages may lead to the use of alternative antimicrobials that are less effective and safer. We have responded to the MEPM shortage with post-prescription monitoring and feedback (PPRF) with no restrictions on MEPM initiation. We aimed to assess the impact of the MEPM shortage and the PPRF on broad-spectrum antimicrobial use and mortality. This retrospective study was conducted in a single hospital in Japan. The period from October 2021 to August 2022 was defined as the period before the MEPM shortage, and the period from September 2022 to March 2023 was defined as the period during the MEPM shortage. To support the appropriate use of antimicrobials during MEPM shortages, the antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) developed a list of alternatives to MEPM. An interrupted time series analysis was used to assess changes in use and mortality among patients receiving broad-spectrum antimicrobials over the study period. The shortage of MEPM and PPRF temporarily increased the use of alternative cefepime; however, the subsequent change in days of therapy and days of coverage of broad-spectrum antimicrobials suggests a decrease in the use of these antimicrobials. Despite these shifts, the mortality rates remained stable, suggesting that the response to the shortage did not adversely affect treatment outcomes. In the context of antimicrobial shortages, AST support plays an important role in enabling physicians to make optimal use of antimicrobials.

Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Correct Management to Reduce Sepsis in NICU Settings.

The discovery of antimicrobial drugs has led to a significant increase in survival from infections; however, they are very often prescribed and administered, even when their use is not necessary and appropriate. Newborns are particularly exposed to infections due to the poor effectiveness and the immaturity of their immune systems. For this reason, in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), the use of antimicrobial drugs is often decisive and life-saving, and it must be started promptly to ensure its effectiveness in consideration of the possible rapid evolution of the infection towards sepsis. Nevertheless, the misuse of antibiotics in the neonatal period leads not only to an increase in the development and wide spreading of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) but it is also associated with various short-term (e.g., alterations of the microbiota) and long-term (e.g., increased risk of allergic disease and obesity) effects. It appears fundamental to use antibiotics only when strictly necessary; specific decision-making algorithms and electronic calculators can help limit the use of unnecessary antibiotic drugs. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the right balance between the risks and benefits of antimicrobial therapy in NICUs; for this purpose, specific Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) in neonatal care and the creation of a specific antimicrobial stewardship team are requested.

Determinants of pharmacists' confidence to participate in antimicrobial stewardship: A confirmatory factor analysis.

Pharmacists are essential members of hospital antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) teams. A lack of self-perceived confidence can limit pharmacists' involvement and contributions. Pharmacists working in AMS have reported a lack of confidence. There is currently a lack of validated measures to assess pharmacists' self-perceived confidence when working in AMS and contributors to this confidence. This study aimed to identify variables contributing to pharmacist self-perceived confidence and validate an AMS hospital pharmacist survey tool using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Responses from a survey of Australian and French hospital pharmacists were used to undertake CFA and path analysis on factors related to pharmacists' self-perceived confidence. It was hypothesized that pharmacists' self-perceived confidence would be impacted by time working in AMS, perceived importance of AMS programmes, perceived barriers to participating in AMS and current participation. CFA demonstrated a good model fit between the factors. Items included in the model loaded well to their respective factors with acceptable reliability. Path analysis demonstrated that time working in AMS had a significant impact on pharmacists' self-perceived confidence, while perceived barriers had a negatively significant relationship. Pharmacy participation in AMS and perceived importance of AMS programmes had a non-significant impact. Findings demonstrated that the survey tool showed good validity and identified factors that can impact pharmacists' self-perceived confidence when working in hospital AMS programmes. Having a validated survey tool can identify factors that can reduce pharmacists' self-perceived confidence. Strategies can then be developed to address these factors and subsequently improve pharmacists' self-perceived confidence.

Intravenous cefuroxime as a first-line treatment for women hospitalized for pyelonephritis

Abstract Background Empirical treatment of pyelonephritis in the emergency ward includes broad-spectrum antibiotics. Such a strategy favours broad-spectrum antibiotic overuse. Local antibiotic stewardship teams can propose local recommendations to adapt empirical antibiotic treatment devoted to spare precious molecules that remain active on MDR bacteria, such as fluoroquinolones or other broad-spectrum antibiotics. Objectives We aimed to evaluate the incidence of urinary tract infection recurrence within 3 months after hospital discharge following empirical antibiotic therapy with cefuroxime in women with pyelonephritis in the emergency room. Patients and methods We conducted a retrospective, single-centre study. We identified 109 women treated for pyelonephritis, 95 with cefuroxime at any time, and 14 with only other antibiotics, and divided them into subgroups based on antibiotic switch to other molecules. We compared the incidence of urinary tract infection recurrence in the subgroups. Results In the group of patients treated with cefuroxime only, we identified five cases of recurrence (9.4%) in a total of 53 patients, but only 1 (1.9%) case of recurrence associated with the same uropathogen. No significant difference in clinical outcome, length of antibiotic treatment, or urinary tract infection recurrence was observed between the subgroups. Conclusions Our study supports that a strategy elaborated by an antibiotic stewardship team based on local ecology and aimed at proposing the narrowest-spectrum antibiotic upon treatment initiation in the emergency room is safe.

Knowledge, awareness and practices of healthcare workers regarding antimicrobial use, resistance and stewardship in Zambia: a multi-facility cross-sectional study.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a threat to public health globally. Despite its consequences, there is little information about the knowledge, awareness, and practices towards AMR among healthcare workers (HCWs). Therefore, this study assessed the knowledge, awareness and practices regarding antimicrobial use (AMU), AMR and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) among HCWs who are involved in the implementation of AMS activities across eight hospitals in Zambia. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 64 HCWs from October to December 2023 using a semi-structured questionnaire. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS version 25.0. Of the 64 HCWs, 59.4% were females, 60.9% were aged between 25 and 34 years, 37.5% were nurses, 18.7% were pharmacists, 17.2% were medical doctors and only one was a microbiologist. Overall, 75% of the HCWs had good knowledge, 84% were highly aware and 84% had good practices regarding AMU, AMR and AMS. Most of the HCWs (90.6%) responded that they had a multidisciplinary AMS team at their hospitals and were implementing the use of the WHO AWaRe classification of antibiotics. This study found good knowledge levels, high awareness and good practices regarding AMU, AMR and AMS among HCWs who were involved in the implementation of AMS activities in hospitals in Zambia. Additionally, most hospitals have been conducting AMS training and implementing the use of the WHO AWaRe classification of antibiotics. However, there is still a need to address some identified gaps in AMU and AMR through the strengthening of AMS activities in hospitals.

Implementing antimicrobial stewardship: lessons and perspectives from a university-affiliated tertiary hospital in Korea.

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) can lower antibiotic use, decrease medical expenses, prevent the emergence of resistant bacteria, and enhance treatment for infectious diseases. This study summarizes the stepwise implementation and effects of ASPs in a single university-affiliated tertiary care hospital in Korea; it also presents future directions and challenges in resource-limited settings. At the study hospital, the core elements of the ASP such as leadership commitment, accountability, and operating system were established in 2000, then strengthened by the formation of the Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) Team in 2018. The actions of ASPs entail key components including a computerized restrictive antibiotic prescription system, prospective audit, post-prescription review through quantitative and qualitative intervention, and pharmacy-based interventions to optimize antibiotic usage. The AMS Team regularly tracked antibiotic use, the effects of interventions, and the resistance patterns of pathogens in the hospital. The reporting system was enhanced and standardized by participation in the Korea National Antimicrobial Use Analysis System, and educational efforts are ongoing. Stepwise implementation of the ASP and the efforts of the AMS Team have led to a substantial reduction in the overall consumption of antibiotics, particularly regarding injectables, and optimization of antibiotic use. Our experience highlights the importance of leadership, accountability, institution-specific interventions, and the AMS Team.