Use Of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Research Articles

Le infezioni neonatali tardive da streptococco di gruppo B: cosa dobbiamo sapere?

In some high-income countries, the widespread use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis has reduced the incidence of early-onset infections (onset from 0 to 6 days of life) with Group B Streptococcus (GBS) and late-onset infections (LOD, Late-Onset Disease, from 7 to 90 days of life) have become the most frequent invasive GBS infections. LODs may re- sult in severe sepsis and meningitis that may lead to neurodevelopmental impairment or death; pathogenesis and mode of transmission of LOD remain poorly understood. Preterm infants, often with prolonged hospital stay in intensive care units, are particularly vulnerable to LOD. The primary goal of contemporary research is to increase knowl- edge of pathogenetic and transmission mechanisms to improve prevention and reduce the severity of these infections.

Maternal Streptococcus agalactiae colonization in Europe: data from the multi-center DEVANI study.

Despite national guidelines and use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococci (GBS)) is still a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in newborns in Europe and the United States. The European DEVANI (Design of a Vaccine Against Neonatal Infections) program assessed the neonatal GBS infection burden in Europe, the clinical characteristics of colonized women and microbiological data of GBS strains in colonized women and their infants with early-onset disease (EOD). Overall, 1083 pregnant women with a GBS-positive culture result from eight European countries were included in the study. Clinical obstetrical information was collected by a standardized questionnaire. GBS strains were characterized by serological and molecular methods. Among GBS carriers included in this study after testing positive for GBS by vaginal or recto-vaginal sampling, 13.4% had at least one additional obstetrical risk factor for EOD. The five most common capsular types (i.e., Ia, Ib, II, III and V) comprised ~ 93% of GBS carried. Of the colonized women, 77.8% received any IAP, and in 49.5% the IAP was considered appropriate. In our cohort, nine neonates presented with GBS early-onset disease (EOD) with significant regional heterogeneity. Screening methods and IAP rates need to be harmonized across Europe in order to reduce the rates of EOD. The epidemiological data from eight different European countries provides important information for the development of a successful GBS vaccine.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis During Allogeneic Stem Cell transplantation—A Comprehensive Single Center Retrospective Analysis

BackgroundProphylactic antibiotics are still controversial during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In our transplant center, we suspended antibiotic prophylaxis during allo-HSCT in 2017. ObjectiveThe main objective of this study was the detailed analysis of the potentially beneficial impact of omittance of standard antibiotic prophylaxis during allo-HSCT in survival and Graft-versus-Host disease (GvHD) development, especially with consideration of confounding factors and competing events. Secondary objectives were the evaluation of the risk of severe infections and transplant-related mortality without antibiotic prophylaxis, the detailed assessment of bacterial and viral infections including multiresistant pathogens as well as occurrence of relapse in both groups. This study aims to support the development of future antibiotic strategies in allo-HSCT. Study DesignWe retrospectively analyzed patient outcome in the time periods before (between December 2012 and February 2017) and after suspension (between March 2017 and June 2020) of antibiotic prophylaxis during allo-HSCT. Relevant clinical outcome parameters of the patients (n = 221) were collected by chart-review in the two groups (with antibiotic prophylaxis n = 101 versus without antibiotic prophylaxis n = 120). All patients were 18 years or older. Propensity score methods were used to adjust for potentially confounding patient characteristics. To address competing events, transitions between moderate/severe acute and chronic GvHD, relapse and death were analyzed using an inverse-propensity score weighted multistate modeling approach. ResultsWhile we observed a trend towards an improved outcome in the cohort without antibiotic prophylaxis, the inverse-propensity-score-weighted analyses did not show significant differences between the two groups in overall survival (OS) (P = .811) or development of acute GvHD (aGvHD) grade 3/4 (P = .158) and chronic moderate/severe GvHD (cGvHD) (P = .686). Multistate analysis respecting competing events revealed comparable estimated probabilities without antibiotic prophylaxis versus with antibiotic prophylaxis in OS (35.0% [95% CI: 28.2%-42.7%] versus 35.3% [95% CI: 27.8%-41.1%]) as well as development of aGvHD grade 3/4 (7.7% [95% CI: 5.9%-12.2%] vs. 10.6% [95% CI: 7.7%-15.7%]) and moderate/severe cGvHD (21.0% [95% CI: 17.7%-30.0%] vs. 23.8% [95% CI: 19.6%-31.4%]). Similar analyses showed also no significant differences in relapse rate, transplant-related mortality, relapse-related mortality, or GvHD-free/relapse-free survival between the two groups. An observed increase in severe infections without antibiotic prophylaxis did not lead to a significantly higher mortality rate. Viral reactivation and detection of multiresistant bacteria were comparable, yet a higher incidence of Clostridioides difficile infections was observed in patients receiving antibiotic prophylaxis. ConclusionOur study supports previous reports of noninferiority of allo-HSCT without use of antibiotic prophylaxis with close monitoring and rapid intervention, if infection is suspected. The trend towards improved outcomes without antibiotic prophylaxis, however, might not only be due to the absence of antibiotic prophylaxis but also due to additional progresses in the field over the recent years. While the present study is too small to draw definite conclusions, these results strongly warrant further multicenter studies addressing the potential benefit of omitting antibiotic prophylaxis during allo-HSCT.

Associations between respiratory pathogens and lung function in primary ciliary dyskinesia: cross-sectional analysis from the PROVALF-PCD cohort.

Respiratory pathogens are frequently isolated from airway samples in primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) patients. Few studies have investigated associations between these pathogens and lung function, with current management based on evidence from cystic fibrosis. We investigated the association between commonly isolated respiratory pathogens and lung function in PCD patients. Using a cross-sectional design, we prospectively collected clinical and concurrent microbiology data from 408 participants with probable or confirmed PCD, aged ≥5 years, from 12 countries. We used Global Lung Function Initiative 2012 references to calculate forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) z-scores. For 351 patients (86%) with complete data, we assessed the association of the four most frequently isolated pathogens with lung function by fitting multilevel linear models with country as random intercept, adjusted for age at diagnosis, age at lung function, use of antibiotic prophylaxis and body mass index z-scores. Individuals with Pseudomonas aeruginosa growth in culture had significantly lower FEV1 z-scores (β= -0.87, 95% CI -1.40- -0.34), adjusted for presence of Haemophilus influenzae, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae, and for covariates. When stratified by age, associations remained strong for adults but not for children. Results were similar when ciliary defects by transmission electron microscopy were included in the models and when restricting analysis to only confirmed PCD cases. We found that P. aeruginosa was associated with worse lung function in individuals with PCD, particularly adults. These findings suggest that it is prudent to aim for P. aeruginosa eradication in the first instance, and to treat exacerbations promptly in colonised patients.

The effect of antibiotic premedication on postoperative complications following dental extractions.

We aimed to evaluate the association between antibiotic prophylaxis and adverse outcomes following tooth extraction within the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing dental extractions in 2015-2019. The primary exposure was antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome was post-extraction complication within 7 days (e.g., alveolar osteitis and surgical site infection); the secondary outcome was subsequent medical care relating to a post-extraction oral complication within 7 days. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the independent effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on each outcome. Of 385,880 visits with a dental extraction, 122,810 (31.8%) received antibiotic prophylaxis. Overall, 3387 (0.9%) experienced a post-extraction complication and 350 (0.09%) received medical care relating to a post-extraction oral complication within 7 days. In multivariable regression, diabetes was a statistically significant (p = 0.01) effect modifier of the association between antibiotic prophylaxis and post-extraction complication. Among visits for patients without diabetes, antibiotic prophylaxis was significantly associated with an increased odds of post-extraction complication (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.38), but among visits for patients with diabetes no significant effect was observed (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.92-1.15). Antibiotic prophylaxis was not significantly associated with post-extraction medical care (OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.83-1.30). In this large retrospective cohort, we observed no significant protective effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on post-extraction complications or subsequent medical care utilization in a setting with low complication rates. These data suggest that use of antibiotic prophylaxis in similar settings may need to be re-evaluated to minimize unnecessary antibiotic use.

Native Infective Endocarditis: A State-of-the-Art-Review.

Native valve infective endocarditis (NVE) is a global phenomenon, defined by infection of a native heart valve and involving the endocardial surface. The causes and epidemiology of the disease have evolved in recent decades, with a doubling of the average patient age. A higher incidence was observed in patients with implanted cardiac devices that can result in right-sided infection of the tricuspid valve. The microbiology of the disease has also changed. Previously, staphylococci, which are most often associated with health-care contact and invasive procedures, were the most common cause of the disease. This has now been superseded by streptococci. While innovative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies have emerged, mortality rates have not improved and remain at 30%, which is higher than that for many cancer diagnoses. The lack of randomized trials and logistical constraints impede clinical management, and long-standing controversies such as the use of antibiotic prophylaxis persist. This state of the art review addresses clinical practice, controversies, and strategies to combat this potentially devastating disease. A multidisciplinary team will be established to provide care for patients with presumptive NVE. The composition of the team will include specialists in cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, and infectious disease. The prompt administration of combination antimicrobial therapy is essential for effective NVE treatment. Additionally, a meticulous evaluation of each patient is necessary in order to identify any indications for immediate valve surgery. With the intention of promoting a more comprehensive understanding of the procedural management of native infective endocarditis and to furnish clinicians with a reference, the current evidence for the utilization of distinct strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of NVE are presented.

Indwelling-tunneled-central-venous-catheter-related early bacteremia and preoperative prophylaxis: a case and control study.

The indication of preoperative prophylaxis in the insertion of indwelling tunneled central venous catheters (ITCVC) has a low level of evidence. Our objective was to assess risk factors of ITCVC-related early bacteremia in oncological pediatric patients and to determine the need for preoperative prophylaxis. A univariate and multivariate retrospective analysis of patients in whom an ITCVC was placed from January 2020 to July 2023, according to whether they had ITCVC-related early bacteremia (EB) in the first 30 postoperative days, was carried out. Demographic variables, leukopenia, neutropenia, use of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, and history of central venous catheter (CVC) or bacteremia were collected. Calculations were carried out using the IBM SSPS29® software. 176 patients with a mean age of 7.6 years (SD: 4.82) were analyzed. 7 EB cases were identified, with a greater frequency of neutropenia (p=0.2), history of CVC in the 48hours before insertion (p=0.08), and intraoperative CVC (p=0.04). The presence of intraoperative CVC increased the risk of EB 9-fold [OR: 9.4 (95%CI: 1.288-69.712) (p=0.027)]. The lack of preoperative prophylaxis did not increase the risk of EB [OR: 2.2 (CI: 0.383-12.669) (p=0.3)]. The association with other variables was not significant. The intraoperative presence of CVC was a risk factor of EB in our patients. Preoperative prophylaxis had no impact on the risk of EB, which in our view does not support its use. However, further studies with a larger sample size are required. Leukopenia or neutropenia at diagnosis were not associated with a greater prevalence of infection.

Gastrointestinal functions after laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: a pilot randomized clinical trial on effects of abdominal drain, prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis, and D3 lymphadenectomy with complete mesocolic excision

PurposeRoutine use of abdominal drain or prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis is no longer part of current clinical practice in colorectal surgery. Nevertheless, in patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA), it may reduce perioperative abdominal contamination. Furthermore, in cancer patients, prolonged surgery with extensive dissection such as central vascular ligation and complete mesocolon excision with D3 lymphadenectomy (altogether radical right colectomy RRC) is called responsible for affecting postoperative ileus. The aim was to evaluate postoperative resumption of gastrointestinal functions in patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for cancer with ICA and standard D2 dissection or RRC, with or without abdominal drain and prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis.MethodsMonocentric factorial parallel arm randomized pilot trial including all consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and ICA for cancer, in 20 months. Patients were randomized on a 1:1:1 ratio to receive abdominal drain, prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis or neither (I level), and 1:1 to receive RRC or D2 colectomy (II level). Patients were not blinded. The primary aim was the resumption of gastrointestinal functions (time to first gas and stool, time to tolerated fluids and food). Secondary aims were length of stay and complications’ rate. ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT04977882.ResultsFifty-seven patients were screened; according to sample size, 36 were randomized, 12 for each arm for postoperative management, and 18 for each arm according to surgical techniques. A difference in time to solid diet favored the group without drain or antibiotic independently from standard or RRC. Furthermore, when patients were divided with respect to surgical technique and into matched cohorts, no differences were seen for primary and secondary outcomes.ConclusionAbdominal drainage and prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for cancer with ICA seem to negatively affect the resumption of a solid diet after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with ICA for cancer. RRC does not seem to influence gastrointestinal function recovery.

30 Does the Use of Antibiotics Prophylaxis Affect the Rate of Postoperative Fistula Rates in Cleft Palate Patients?

Abstract Aim Assess whether post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis affected the incidence of oronasal fistula formation in cleft palate patients. Design and setting: Institutional retrospective study using data from patients undergoing primary palatoplasty. Gold standard Fistula rate of no more than 8-10%. Method In the first cycle, there were two groups (A and B). In group A, the patients had antibiotics on induction and 24 hours after, in group B, the patients had further antibiotics for a week. Our work from the cleft collective showed no evidence of change in fistula rates in relation to the antibiotic regime. Therefore, group A surgeon changed practice had antibiotics only on induction and group B remained the same from the first cycle. Results In cycle 1, we found little evidence to suggest a difference in fistula rate between the use of an antibiotic regimen as binary variables: Grp A(P=0.171) and Grp B (P=0.69). Cycle 2 also demonstrated the following: Grp A (P=0.557) and Grp B(P=0.443). Conclusions The use of antibiotics and differing regimes, postoperatively do not influence the incidence of postoperative fistulae in cleft palate.

820 “Antibiotics Because We’re Inserting a Mesh”: A Study to Evaluate Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Hernia Repairs

Abstract Aim Inguinal hernias are one of the most common pathologies worldwide. Over 20 million inguinal hernia repairs are performed each year. The HerniaSurge Collaboration recently updated their international guidelines for groin hernia management. They concluded that antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended in elective open inguinal mesh hernia repairs in average-risk patients in a low infection risk environment. In laparoscopic hernia repairs, antibiotics are never recommended. This study aimed to identify current practice for antibiotic prophylaxis use in elective inguinal hernia repairs within our district general hospital environment. Method A retrospective study was performed, evaluating all elective inguinal hernia repairs with mesh between 1st June 2022-31st December 2022. Both laparoscopic and open techniques were included in this study. Operative notes were reviewed to ascertain if patients had been given antibiotics intra-operatively. Results The study identified 84 patients who underwent an inguinal hernia repair with mesh across a 7 month- period. Of these, all were operated on in a low-risk environment. 94% (N=79) were given antibiotic prophylaxis intraoperatively. Conclusions Antibiotic prophylaxis is still being used for low-risk patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia surgery. This is not in keeping with current hernia guidelines which suggests that there is no significant benefit to antibiotic use. Excessive antibiotic use is associated with an increase in adverse events, an increased rate of antibiotic resistant organisms and increased healthcare costs.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery for closed fracture of the hand

PurposePreoperative antibiotic prophylaxis is associated to internal fixation for closed phalangeal and metacarpal fracture, but its effectiveness is not known. MethodsIn a consecutive series of 119 adult patients undergoing Kirschner-wire fixation for phalangeal or metacarpal fracture, 56.3% (n = 67) received antibiotic prophylaxis and 43.7% (n = 52) did not. ResultsThe rate of deep surgical site infection was 1.5% (n = 1) in the group with antibiotic prophylaxis and 1.9% (n = 1) in the group without. Minor skin irritation or infection of the pin tract occurred in 13.4% of cases (n = 9) in the group with antibiotic prophylaxis and 9.6% (n = 5) in the group without. ConclusionOur findings suggest that use of antibiotic prophylaxis could be reduced in the treatment of closed fractures of the hand treated with removable pins. Type of study/level of evidenceTherapeutic IV (retrospective review).

Study of the Practice of Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Use for Elective Neurosurgical Cases in a Tertiary Hospital and Understanding the Rationale

This study aims to evaluate the adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines in elective neurosurgery and assess the impact on surgical site infection (SSI) rates in a tertiary teaching hospital in Malaysia. A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent elective neurosurgical procedures from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021, in a 1600-bed tertiary teaching hospital. The study assessed adherence to national and hospital SAP guidelines, focusing on the choice of antibiotic, dosage, timing, and duration. Additionally, a survey was conducted among neurosurgeons to evaluate their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding SAP. Out of 202 patients included, there was a 99% compliance rate with antibiotic choice and 69.8% with the antibiotic duration. The SSI rate was identified at 6.4%. The knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey highlighted a strong awareness of SAP guidelines among surgeons, albeit with variations in practice, particularly in antibiotic duration and choice of antibiotics. While there is high adherence to the correct choice of antibiotic for SAP in elective neurosurgery, there are gaps in compliance with the recommended duration of antibiotic use. The study highlights the need for targeted interventions to improve adherence to SAP guidelines, which could potentially reduce the incidence of SSI in neurosurgery. Ongoing education and auditing are essential to optimize SAP practices and enhance patient outcomes in neurosurgery.

Point prevalence surveys of antibiotic prescribing in children at a tertiary hospital in a resource constraint, low-income sub-Saharan African country—the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program

BackgroundResistance to multiple antibiotics by several pathogens has been widely described in children and has become a global health emergency. This is due to increased use by parents, caregivers, and healthcare providers. This study aims to describe the prevalence rates of antibiotic prescribing, ascertain the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs, and target improving the quality of antibiotic prescribing in the paediatric population over time in a hospital.MethodA point prevalence survey of antibiotic use was performed yearly for 4 years to monitor trends in antibiotic prescribing. Data from all patients admitted before 8 a.m. on the day of the PPS were included. A web-based application designed by the University of Antwerp was used for data entry, validation, and analysis (http://www.global-pps.com).ResultsA total of 260 children, including 90 (34.6%) neonates and 170 (65.4%) older children, were admitted during the four surveys. Overall, 179 (68.8%) patients received at least one antibiotic. In neonates, the prevalence of antibiotic use increased from 78.9 to 89.5% but decreased from 100 to 58.8% in older children. There was a reduction in the use of antibiotics for prophylaxis from 45.7 to 24.6%. The most frequently prescribed antibiotic groups were third generation cephalosporins and aminoglycosides. The most common indications for antibiotic prescription were sepsis in neonates and central nervous system infection in older children. The documentation of reason in notes increased from 33 to 100%, while the stop-review date also increased from 19.4 to 70%.ConclusionThe indicators for appropriate antibiotic prescription improved over time with the introduction of antibiotic stewardship program in the department.

Hepatobiliary Infection after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation in Patients with Prior Biliary Intervention: A Multi-Institution Retrospective Study

PurposeTo estimate the risk of hepatobiliary infection, including endoTIPSitis, liver abscesses, and cholangitis, after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation in patients with prior biliary intervention. Materials and MethodsThis multi-institution, retrospective study identified 76 patients (n = 48 males; mean age, 54.9 years; mean Model for End-stage Liver Disease [MELD] score, 13.2; n = 45 for ascites and n = 23 for varices; n = 31 with prior liver transplantation) among 2,130 (3.6%) undergoing TIPS creation who had prior biliary intervention (n = 19 bilioenteric anastomoses, n = 35 sphincterotomies, n = 28 internal plastic stent placements, n = 4 internal metal stent placements, and n = 6 percutaneous biliary drain placements). The baseline risk of post–TIPS creation hepatobiliary infection was estimated from a control group of 1,202 TIPS creation procedures in patients without prior biliary intervention. ResultsEleven (14.5%) of 76 patients developed hepatobiliary infection after TIPS creation, including 7 with endoTIPSitis, 4 with hepatic abscesses, and 2 with cholangitis. The 30-day risk of infection was 10.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5%–17.8%), significantly higher than the 0.4% risk (95% CI, 0.1%–0.8%) observed in patients without prior biliary intervention (hazard ratio [HR], 25.56; 95% CI, 8.36–78.13; P < .001). All types of biliary intervention were associated with increased risk of infection, with bilioenteric anastomoses conferring the highest risk. Paradoxically, among patients with prior biliary intervention, use of postprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with an increased infection risk (HR, 19.85; 95% CI, 2.44–161.50; P = .005). Microbial culture data showed high rates of Enterococcus, Klebsiella, and Candida species. ConclusionsPrior biliary intervention was associated with a 10.9% risk of hepatobiliary infection, including endoTIPSitis, liver abscess, and cholangitis, within 30 days after TIPS creation.

Impact of antibiotic stewardship program implementation on optimizing the use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis

Impact of antibiotic stewardship program implementation on optimizing the use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis

Duration of cefazolin prophylaxis did not impact infection risk in a murine model of joint arthroplasty.

To minimize periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) risk, some clinicians prescribe extended antibiotic prophylaxis (EAP) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Given the limited evidence supporting EAP, we sought to evaluate impact of prophylactic antibiotic duration on PJI risk in a murine TJA model. A titanium prosthesis was implanted into the proximal tibia of 89 mice and inoculated with 102 colony forming units (cfu) of Staphylococcus aureus Xen36. Control mice (n = 20) did not receive antibiotics. Treated mice received either 24 h (n = 35) or 4 days (n = 34) of cefazolin prophylaxis. Cultures were obtained from the prostheses, tibia, femur, and knee tissues 3 weeks after surgery. All mice in the control group developed PJI. Both prophylaxis regimens reduced the rate of PJI relative to the control, with only 2/35 mice in the 24-h cohort (p < 0.0001) and 1/34 in 4-day cohort developing PJI (p < 0.0001). CFU counts from the prostheses, bone and knee tissues were reduced for the 24-h and 4-day prophylaxis cohorts relative to the control (p < 0.0001 for both). There was no difference in rates of PJI or CFU counts between the two prophylaxis cohorts (p = 0.58). Prophylactic cefazolin profoundly reduced rates of PJI in a murine model of TJA in which all control animals developed PJI. Extending cefazolin prophylaxis duration from 24 h to 4 days did not result in improved PJI rates or decreased bacterial loads in infected cases. While these results strongly support use of antibiotic prophylaxis for TJA, EAP did not appear to add benefit in the described mouse model.

New evidence calls into question NICE's endocarditis prevention guidance

In 2008, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommended against the use of antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) before invasive dental procedures (IDPs) to prevent infective endocarditis (IE). They did so because of lack of AP efficacy evidence and adverse reaction concerns. Consequently, NICE concluded AP was not cost-effective and should not be recommended. In 2015, NICE reviewed its guidance and continued to recommend against AP. However, it subsequently changed its wording to ‘antibiotic prophylaxis against infective endocarditis is not routinely recommended'. The lack of explanation of what constituted routinely (and not routinely), or how to manage non-routine patients, caused enormous confusion and NICE remained out of step with all major international guideline committees who continued to recommend AP for those at high risk.Since the 2015 guideline review, new data have confirmed an association between IDPs and subsequent IE and demonstrated AP efficacy in reducing IE risk following IDPs in high-risk patients. New evidence also shows that in high-risk patients, the IE risk following IDPs substantially exceeds any adverse reaction risk, and that AP is therefore highly cost-effective. Given the new evidence, a NICE guideline review would seem appropriate so that UK high-risk patients can receive the same protection afforded high-risk patients in the rest of the world.

Advanced Antimicrobial and Anti-Infective Strategies to Manage Peri-Implant Infection: A Narrative Review.

Despite reductions in bacterial infection and enhanced success rate, the widespread use of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in implant dentistry is controversial. This use has contributed to the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance, along with creating significant health and economic burdens. The basic mechanisms that cause implant infection can be targeted by new prevention and treatment methods which can also lead to the reduction of systemic antibiotic exposure and its associated adverse effects. This review aims to summarize advanced biomaterial strategies applied to implant components based on anti-pathogenic mechanisms and immune balance mechanisms. It emphasizes that modifying the dental implant surface and regulating the early immune response are promising strategies, which may further prevent or slow the development of peri-implant infection, and subsequent failure.

The Intrarenal Reflux Diagnosed by Contrast-Enhanced Voiding Urosonography (ceVUS): A Reason for the Reclassification of Vesicoureteral Reflux and New Therapeutic Approach?

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is defined as the urine backflow from the urinary bladder to the pyelo-caliceal system. In contrast, intrarenal reflux (IRR) is the backflow of urine from the renal calyces into the tubulointerstitial space. VURs, particularly those associated with IRR can result in reflux nephropathy when accompanied by urinary tract infection (UTI). The prevalence of IRR in patients with diagnosed VUR is 1-11% when using voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), while 11.9-61% when applying the contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS). The presence of IRR diagnosed by VCUG often correlates with parenchymal scars, when diagnosed by a 99mTc dimercaptosuccinic acid scan (DMSA scan), mostly in kidneys with high-grade VURs, and when diagnosed by ceVUS, it correlates with the wide spectrum of parenchymal changes on DMSA scan. The study performed by both ceVUS and DMSA scans showed IRRs associated with non-dilated VURs in 21% of all detected VURs. A significant difference regarding the existence of parenchymal damage was disclosed between the IRR-associated and IRR-non-associated VURs. A higher portion of parenchymal changes existed in the IRR-associated VURs, regardless of the VUR grade. That means that kidneys with IRR-associated VURs represent the high-risk group of VURs, which must be considered in the future classification of VURs. When using ceVUS, 62% of places where IRR was found were still unaffected by parenchymal changes. That was the basis for our recommendation of preventive use of long-term antibiotic prophylaxis until the IRR disappearance, regardless of the VUR grade. We propose a new classification of VURs using the ceVUS method, in which each VUR grade is subdivided based on the presence of an IRR.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in calculous cholecystitis: are antibiotics necessary?

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cholecystitis is considered the best, appropriate and safe method of treatment for gallstone disease. However, the role of antibiotic administration before or after cholecystectomy to reduce infectious complications, particularly surgical site infections, or mortality is less clear. Many patients receive empiric antibiotics, but the feasibility of their use has not been proven. Some guidelines suggest the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for all cholecystectomies, although current evidence does not indicate any benefit to this practice in the absence of risk factors. This review examines the results of antibiotic use in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for chronic and acute calculous cholecystitis. Most studies argue against the need to use prophylactic antibiotics during elective surgery in low-risk patients. In cases of mild and moderate acute cholecystitis, the use of antibiotics to prevent postoperative infectious complications has no evidence of effectiveness, although these recommendations are also ambiguous. It is not recommended to use postoperative antibiotics after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, as well as for mild or moderate acute cholecystitis. However, additional studies with well-defined patient populations and comparable outcomes are needed to better assess the most appropriate timing and duration of antibiotic use in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We used MedLine database on the PubMed platform and the Cochrane library to search for literature sources.