Over-prescription Of Antibiotics Research Articles

Pediatric tonsilitis: modern tactics against an old foe

Abstract Background Pediatric tonsillitis (PT) impacts public health due to its widespread incidence and the prevalent overprescription of antibiotics driven by concerns over Group A β-hemolytic streptococcus (SGA) complications. Rapid antigen diagnostic tests (RADT) serve as vital tools for promptly identifying SGA infections in PT cases. However, despite their widespread availability, healthcare professionals often underutilize RADT, leading to inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions. Clinical audits and feedback to professionals emerge as solutions to this issue. Methods An audit was conducted on clinical cases of PT during 2023 to evaluate the correct usage of RADT and subsequent antibiotic prescription across various primary care practices in Lisbon, Portugal. Afterwards, a pilot practice was selected to assess the feasibility and utility of an online tool designed specifically to report RADT results and create a real-time surveillance system of incidence of SGA with feedback to prescribing clinicians. Following the revision of the reporting tool after the pilot, its implementation was extended to multiple practices across the Lisbon region. Results From the 1050 clinical cases analyzed, 992 had an indication to do a RADT according to the Portuguese guidelines, however only 282 (28.4%) tests were done. Overall, only 19.6% of PT cases were considered fully compliant. During the pilot, the introduction of the online tool led to a 3.259 increase in reporting (from 0.574 RADT/day to 1.872 RADT/day) for the same time period between February and March. Conclusions The implementation of an online reporting tool represents a significant advancement in SGA surveillance efforts, detecting cases promptly for public health interventions. This initiative underscores the importance of continuous quality improvement in diagnostics and shows digital tools’ potential for better disease surveillance in clinical settings. Key messages • Underutilization of RADT in PT cases contributes to inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions, compromising patient care. • Introduction of an online reporting tool significantly enhances RADT usage, aiding prompt SGA detection for improved public health interventions.

Qualitative drivers of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics use and resistance in Ethiopia.

The World Health Organization (WHO) cautions against unnecessary prolongation of postoperative antibiotics to prevent surgical site infections (SSI), however this practice is still common in many countries. This study aims to describe drivers of prolonged postoperative antibiotic prescribing and clinicians' perspectives on antibiotics resistance and stewardship in Ethiopia. We conducted semi-structured interviews of 16 surgeons and nine surgical ward nurses at three academic referral hospitals in Addis Ababa. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and coded. Codes were inductively and iteratively derived between two researchers, tested for inter-rater reliability (IRR), and the codebook was consistently applied to all transcripts. Thematic analysis was performed to understand drivers of prolonged prophylactic antibiotic use in surgical patients. Interviews revealed factors contributing to postoperative prophylactic antibiotics overprescribing, including inadequate infection prevention and control (IPC) practices, wide variability in local prescribing practices, and distrust in the applicability of WHO guidelines. Antimicrobial resistance was also identified as a major concern by staff. Barriers to improving stewardship included a lack of multidisciplinary teamwork to inform prescribing decisions, while solutions included constructing appropriate context-specific guidelines and improving evidence-based practices through input from local stakeholders, including surgeons, clinical pharmacists, and nurses. Study participants perceived that existing evidence and guidelines did not apply in their settings due to high rates of surgical site infections and gaps in perioperative IPC practices (e.g., availability of water for handwashing, sterility breaches). These gaps were a key contributor to prophylactic antibiotic overprescribing, reinforcing the need to strengthen upstream and perioperative surgical antisepsis processes. The findings of this study underscore the importance of engaging multidisciplinary teams in strengthening antimicrobial stewardship efforts, aligning processes to achieve compliance with best practices, and the need for rigorous, contextually appropriate studies from these settings to inform policy.

Implementation of an algorithm for testing, diagnosis, and antibiotic stewardship of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy

BackgroundAsymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) affects 2-15% of pregnant women, with 20-40% developing symptoms later. Symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs) are more common in pregnancy, with a prevalence of 33%, posing risks like preterm delivery, low birth weight, and maternal pyelonephritis. The gold standard for UTI detection is a urine culture, but point-of-care urinalysis dipsticks are frequently performed as screens during regular obstetric visits. Leukocyte esterase has been used to justify treatment in the asymptomatic, even with low sensitivity and specificity. Confirmatory tests are crucial to avoid false positives and ensure optimal outcomes. Current guidelines for urinalysis dipstick interpretation and the decision to treat ASB in pregnancy are limited. It remains unclear if an evidence-based algorithm can improve test utilization, diagnosis, and treatment decisions for ASB in pregnancy. ObjectivesThe primary objective of our study is to develop, implement, and evaluate an evidence-based algorithm to guide urinalysis interpretation, culturing, diagnosis, and antibiotic stewardship of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant patients during routine obstetric visits. Study DesignThe project involves both retrospective and quasi-experimental prospective chart reviews of pregnant patients aged 18 and older, beyond 20 weeks gestation, from routine obstetric visits with urinalysis dipstick tests. A doctorate in clinical laboratory sciences student developed an educational algorithm to guide urinalysis dipstick interpretation, culturing necessity, and treatment decisions based on evidence-based practice. Our study considered patient records from February 1 – 28, 2022 as retrospective (pre-algorithm implementation) data and January 24 - February 22, 2023, as prospective (post-algorithm implementation) data. Data collected from the electronic medical record included de-identified patient information, urinalysis results, culture dates and outcomes, antibiotic prescriptions, UTI or ASB diagnoses, provider details, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and demographics. Data analysis using SPSS version 29 involved chi-square tests, likelihood ratios, and effect size calculations, with P-values <0.05 considered statistically significant. ResultsIn our study, we examined a total of 1,176 patient records. Pre-implementation data included 440 records, with 224 abnormal and 216 normal urinalyses. Post-implementation data encompassed 736 records, of which 255 were abnormal and 481 were normal. The patient demographics predominantly featured White (87%), with a median maternal age of 27 years and a gestational age of 32 weeks. Our pre-implementation analyses revealed significant associations between algorithm deviations with both culture utilization (P <.001) and antibiotic stewardship (P <.001). However, no significant associations were observed between algorithm deviations and adverse patient outcomes. Culture underutilization decreased significantly from 43.0% (189/440) pre-implementation to 29.5% (217/736) post-implementation (P < .001). The overall reduction in ASB prevalence from 16.3% (8/49) to 6.7% (10/67) suggests a decrease of nearly 60%. Additionally, antibiotic overprescription decreased significantly from 1.6% (4/258) pre-implementation to 0.8% (4/522) post-implementation (P = .003), with a reduction from 7.1% (3/42) to 2.4% (1/41) among abnormal urinalyses. ConclusionOur findings show a strong alignment between the use of the algorithm and subsequent clinical decisions, underscoring its potential to enhance patient care and management in obstetric settings. Notably, adherence to the algorithm was higher among providers displaying prudent antibiotic use.

Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care tests for acute respiratory infection: a systematic review of reviews.

Acute respiratory infections are a common reason for consultation with primary and emergency healthcare services. Identifying individuals with a bacterial infection is crucial to ensure appropriate treatment. However, it is also important to avoid overprescription of antibiotics, to prevent unnecessary side effects and antimicrobial resistance. We conducted a systematic review to summarise evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms, signs and point-of-care tests to diagnose bacterial respiratory tract infection in adults, and to diagnose two common respiratory viruses, influenza and respiratory syncytial virus. The primary approach was an overview of existing systematic reviews. We conducted literature searches (22 May 2023) to identify systematic reviews of the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care tests. Where multiple reviews were identified, we selected the most recent and comprehensive review, with the greatest overlap in scope with our review question. Methodological quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tool. Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity or area under the curve) were extracted. Where no systematic review was identified, we searched for primary studies. We extracted sufficient data to construct a 2 × 2 table of diagnostic accuracy, to calculate sensitivity and specificity. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies version 2 tool. Where possible, meta-analyses were conducted. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence from existing reviews and new analyses. We identified 23 reviews which addressed our review question; 6 were selected as the most comprehensive and similar in scope to our review protocol. These systematic reviews considered the following tests for bacterial respiratory infection: individual symptoms and signs; combinations of symptoms and signs (in clinical prediction models); clinical prediction models incorporating C-reactive protein; and biological markers related to infection (including C-reactive protein, procalcitonin and others). We also identified systematic reviews that reported the accuracy of specific tests for influenza and respiratory syncytial virus. No reviews were found that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of white cell count for bacterial respiratory infection, or multiplex tests for influenza and respiratory syncytial virus. We therefore conducted searches for primary studies, and carried out meta-analyses for these index tests. Overall, we found that symptoms and signs have poor diagnostic accuracy for bacterial respiratory infection (sensitivity ranging from 9.6% to 89.1%; specificity ranging from 13.4% to 95%). Accuracy of biomarkers was slightly better, particularly when combinations of biomarkers were used (sensitivity 80-90%, specificity 82-93%). The sensitivity and specificity for influenza or respiratory syncytial virus varied considerably across the different types of tests. Tests involving nucleic acid amplification techniques (either single pathogen or multiplex tests) had the highest diagnostic accuracy for influenza (sensitivity 91-99.8%, specificity 96.8-99.4%). Most of the evidence was considered low or very low certainty when assessed with GRADE, due to imprecision in effect estimates, the potential for bias and the inclusion of participants outside the scope of this review (children, or people in hospital). Currently evidence is insufficient to support routine use of point-of-care tests in primary and emergency care. Further work must establish whether the introduction of point-of-care tests adds value, or simply increases healthcare costs. This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number NIHR159948.

Prescribing Pattern and Treatment Outcomes in Upper Respiratory Tract Infection: A Comparative Study of Allopathic and Unani Medicine

Background and objectiveUpper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) rank among the top three diagnoses in outpatient settings. URTIs patients currently have access to treatment choices encompassing traditional and allopathic medications. The study aimed to elucidate the prevailing treatment practices in Unani and allopathic systems for URTIs, while concurrently assessing their efficacy in alleviating its symptoms. Materials and methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at NIUM Hospital and a primary health centre in Bengaluru between June to December 2022. 200 eligible patients (100 per facility) were selected through purposive sampling. Prescriptions were analysed using established WHO and customized Unani indicators. Treatment efficacy was assessed using the WURSS-21 and Jackson scales. Information from the patients was gathered through interviews after obtaining written informed consent. ResultsThe average number of drugs per prescription was 2.68 in allopathy and 3.87 in Unani medicine. Antihistamines and antibiotics were the most prescribed drugs in allopathy, with cetirizine and amoxicillin dominating the list. In Unani Medicine, Arq Ajeeb and Nuqoo-e-Nazla were commonly prescribed. Only 10.8% of prescribed drugs in allopathy were from WHO list of essential medicines. Statistically significant improvement (p<0.001) in URTIs symptoms was observed with both Unani and allopathic treatments. ConclusionThe findings indicates that average number of drugs per prescription in both facilities were above the recommendations. In allopathy, overprescribing of antibiotics and antihistamines, and deviation from EDL, was observed, while polypharmacy was noted in Unani prescriptions. Findings indicate that both Unani and allopathic treatments are effective in alleviating the URTIs symptoms, as reported by patients.

Primary Healthcare Physicians' Insufficient Knowledge Is Associated with Antibiotic Overprescribing for Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infections in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Overuse of antibiotics in healthcare remains prevalent and requires urgent attention in China, particularly in primary healthcare (PHC) facilities. This study aimed to describe the patterns of antibiotic prescriptions for acute upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) in PHC facilities in China and to investigate how PHC physicians' knowledge influences their antibiotic prescribing behavior. A cross-sectional survey linking physician questionnaire responses and their prescription data was conducted in Shaanxi Province, China. The proportions of URTI visits that received at least one antibiotic, combined antibiotics, and broad-spectrum antibiotics were the main outcomes reflecting antibiotic prescribing behavior. Multivariate mixed-effects logistic regressions were applied to analyze the relationship between PHC physicians' knowledge about antibiotics and their antibiotic prescribing behavior. A total of 108 physicians filled out the questionnaires between February 2021 and July 2021, and a sample of 11,217 URTI visits attended by these physicians from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020 were included in the analysis. The overall mean score of our respondents on the knowledge questions was 5.2 (total score of 10). Over sixty percent (61.2%; IQR 50.2-72.1) of the URTI visits received antibiotics. The percentages of URTI visits prescribed with combined and broad-spectrum antibiotics were 7.8% (IQR 2.3-10.2) and 48.3% (IQR 36.7-58.7), respectively. Third-generation cephalosporins were the most frequently used antibiotics. Physicians with lower antibiotic knowledge scores were more inclined to prescribe antibiotics (p < 0.001), combined antibiotics (p = 0.001), and broad-spectrum antibiotics (p < 0.001). Physicians' insufficient knowledge was significantly associated with antibiotic overprescribing. Professional training targeting physicians' knowledge of antibiotics is urgently needed to improve the rational use of antibiotics in grassroots healthcare facilities in China.

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE IMMUNE-BOOSTING PREPARATIONS IN PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS

Respiratory infections are undoubtedly one of the most common diseases that both primary care physicians and specialists working in hospitals have to deal with. The percentage of these diseases is particularly high in children and, depending on the child's age, may range from 6% to even 25%. A major clinical problem is the recurrent nature of these infections and their complications. This results in receiving an increased number of medications that can cause numerous side effects. Overprescription of antibiotics and consequently, increase of antibiotic resistance are also observed. Looking forward, the prevention of the recurrent infections is the key problem. The aim of our work was to evaluate the efficacy of the most popular preparations available on the pharmaceutical market that can improve immunity and complement conventional methods of treating infections or completely replace them. These include: elderberry, β-Glucans, lactoferrin, colostrum, black cumin preparations, echinacea, propolis, Streptococcus salivarius K12, inosine pranobex, ginseng, OM-85 bacterial lysate. We reviewed the literature from 2012 to 2024 using Pubmed and Google Scholar. The assesment of the effectiveness of preparations for immunity was based primarily on the systematic reviews, meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials. The above-mentioned preparations are largely characterized by a positive impact on improving the immunity of people supplementing them by activating non-specific immunity mechanisms. Thanks to this, some of the respondents can observe the regulation of the body's inflammatory response and, consequently, a decrease in the number of infections and their course. Due to the still insufficient number of studies on these preparations and the discrepancies in the results obtained among authors, further researches are needed to take a clear stance on their effectiveness.

Antibiotic Use Awareness and Practices in the Indian Community During Later Stages of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Background: An increased overuse of antibiotics coupled with dearth of newer alternatives has worsened antibiotic resistance in LMIC’s like India. The prescription of antibiotics for symptoms similar to COVID-19 infection has aggravated the problem of antibiotic overuse, further worsening antibiotic resistance. This study aims at understanding not only the extent of overuse, but also the social patterns and causes of over-prescription or self medication of antibiotics in India. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of the knowledge, attitude and practices on antibiotic use was conducted from September to October, 2022, using a Google form questionnaire. A virtual snowball technique was used to recruit respondents. Results: A total of 309 responses were received (56% female and 44% male). 59.5% of the respondents were between 15 to 30 years. Surprisingly, in spite of a majority of respondents (around 70%) having a health sciences background, 67.8% of respondents falsely believe that antibiotics speed up recovery from most coughs and colds. 94.8% of respondents had used antibiotics in the last one year. 17.2% of respondents had taken antibiotics without the prescription of a doctor. The most common antibiotic used on prescription and self-medication was Azithromycin. Only 20.7% of respondents took antibiotics on suspicion of having COVID-19, with the most common one being Azithromycin. Conclusion: The study highlights that a greater knowledge on antibiotic use does not necessitate better attitude towards their cautious and rational use. The use of antibiotics for self-limiting indications like cough, cold and sore throat needs to be restricted through stricter regulations.

Rationalizing irrational prescribing-infection-related attitudes and practices across paediatric surgery specialties in a hospital in South India.

Antibiotic use in paediatric surgical specialties is understudied. We investigated the antibiotic prescribing practices of paediatric general and cardiovascular surgical teams in a tertiary hospital in South India. Mixed-methods study including observations from ward rounds, semi-structured interviews, and review of antibiotic prescribing. Field notes from observations and interview transcripts were coded using NVivo and thematically analysed. Data collection and analysis were iterative and continued until thematic saturation. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Data included 62 h of observation, 24 interviews, one case study and 200 patient chart reviews (100/specialty). Senior surgeons make key decisions, referring to their own experience when prescribing antibiotics. Being outcome-driven, the doctors often prescribe antibiotics at the earliest indication of infection with a reluctance to de-escalate, even when an infection is not diagnosed. This practice is more acute among surgeons who consider themselves responsible for their patients' health and attribute the consistently low surgical site infection rates to this practice.In general surgery, 83.3% (80/96; 4 lost to follow-up) of patients were prescribed antibiotics for the duration of their stay with oral antibiotics prescribed at discharge. The surgeons use antibiotics prophylactically for patients who may be vulnerable to infection. The antimicrobial stewardship team was considered to have limited influence in the decision-making process. Outcome-driven decision-making in surgery leads to overprescription of antibiotics and prolonged surgical prophylaxis. The rationale for suboptimal practices is complicated by the surgeons' beliefs about the contextual determinants of health in India.

Antibiotic prescription prevalence in Iranian outpatients: A focus on defined daily doses and the AWaRe classification system

The inappropriate use and overprescription of antibiotics pose a global health threat, particularly contributing to antimicrobial resistance. This study aims to evaluate antibiotic prescription prevalence in Iranian outpatients using the defined daily doses (DDD) and Access, Watch, and Reserve classification systems. This retrospective study analyzed electronic prescriptions for systemic antibiotics in Tehran, Iran, from March 2022 to March 2023. The data were obtained from the Iranian Health Insurance Organization and processed using the Cross-Industry Standard Process. Descriptive statistics and DDD per 1,000 inhabitants per day were calculated. A total of 817,178 antibiotic prescriptions were analyzed, with a sex distribution of 57.43% female and a median age of 48 years. On average, each patient received 1.89 antibiotics per prescription. Over 63% of antibiotics were classified in the "Watch" category, with Azithromycin being the most commonly prescribed (27.56%). The total DDD per 1,000 inhabitants per day was 4.99, with general practitioners accounting for 58.02% of the prescriptions, primarily prescribing Azithromycin. The study emphasizes the high use of Watch group antibiotics, indicating a need for improved prescribing practices. Education on antibiotic stewardship and stricter guidelines are necessary to combat antimicrobial resistance. Continuous monitoring is crucial to optimize antibiotic use in outpatient settings in Iran.

Identifying Higher-Volume Antibiotic Outpatient Prescribers Using Medicare Part D Prescription Data — Arizona, 2021

Background: Increased antibiotic resistance is a rising global health problem that can result from overprescribing and misusing antibiotics. The impact of antibiotic overprescribing is significant, particularly among the older adult population due to increased adverse reactions. The objective of this study is to identify higher volume antibiotic outpatient prescribers and their antibiotic prescription rates by region and provider specialties in Arizona. Methods: Publicly available data from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Part D Prescriber database during 2021 was analyzed. Those prescribers who had beneficiaries and antibiotic claims of fewer than 11 were excluded from the analysis. Higher-volume prescribers were identified by estimating the providers who prescribed the highest 10th percentile of antibiotic volume. The cumulative percentage of antibiotic prescriptions and prescriber’s antibiotic volume per 1000 beneficiaries (prescribing rate) were compared between the higher volume prescribers and lower volume prescribers by the EMS region and specialty. Median prescribing rates among prescribers were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. All analyses were performed using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute, NC). Results: The number of Arizona prescribers included in the dataset during 2021 was 27,124. After excluding prescribers with fewer than 11 antibiotic prescriptions, 14,410 prescribers were included in the analysis. These providers prescribed a total of 1,095,559 antibiotic prescriptions, with a median of 45 antibiotic prescriptions per prescriber. Thirty-nine percent of antibiotic prescriptions were written by the higher volume prescribers and prescribed a median of 236 antibiotic prescriptions. Higher-volume prescribers had a 52% higher median antibiotic prescribing rate compared with lower-volume prescribers (600 versus 396 prescriptions per 1,000 beneficiaries) (p &lt; 0.01). The median antibiotic prescribing rate among higher volume prescribers was highest in the central region (602 antibiotic prescriptions per 1,000 beneficiaries) compared with other regions (581 prescriptions per 1,000 beneficiaries in the north region) (p &lt; 0.01). The top two specialties that higher volume prescribers practiced were family practice and nurse practitioners. Antibiotic prescribing rates of higher-volume prescribers were highest among dentists (1,118 prescriptions per 1,000 beneficiaries).

'When all you have is a hammer, everything has to be a nail': Managing diagnostic uncertainty in urinary tract infection.

Diagnosis of urinary tract infections (UTI) is a routine part of medical work and yet is well recognised to be an area of high clinical uncertainty. Meanwhile, diagnosis of UTI is becoming increasingly important to policymakers globally due to concerns about antibiotic over-prescription. Drawing on Mol's concept of ontological multiplicity in clinical work, I explore how diagnostic uncertainty is co-ordinated into certainty by a UK national diagnostic algorithm for UTI. The diagnosis of UTI is produced or withheld as a post hoc rationalisation of a prior decision whether to prescribe antibiotics or not. Work in the sociology of diagnosis has already noted that diagnostic steps are often re-ordered by health-care professionals taking diverse actions in the best interest of their patients. This article contributes an argument that ordering diagnostic work around antimicrobial stewardship agendas has the effect of narrowing possible actions. Exploring the consequences and effects of doing diagnosis in this way for different groups, I argue that a greater creativity about what could be done to care for painful bladders could be found in a return to more clinical ways of working.

How to Mitigate Community Harms of Antibacterial Resistance With Patient-Centered Care.

Overprescription of antibiotics in cases in which bacterial infection is clinically uncertain contributes to increased prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Ethically, merits and drawbacks of stricter prescription practice oversight should be weighed against risks of untreatable bacterial infections to patients and communities. This article considers how to balance this set of ideas and values.

Overuse of antibiotics for urinary tract infections in pregnant refugees, Lebanon.

To determine whether adding urine culture to urinary tract infection diagnosis in pregnant women from refugee camps in Lebanon reduced unnecessary antibiotic use. We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study between April and June 2022 involving pregnant women attending a Médecins Sans Frontières sexual reproductive health clinic in south Beirut. Women with two positive urine dipstick tests (i.e. a suspected urinary tract infection) provided urine samples for culture. Bacterial identification and antimicrobial sensitivity testing were conducted following European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines. We compared the characteristics of women with positive and negative urine culture findings and we calculated the proportion of antibiotics overprescribed or inappropriately used. We also estimated the cost of adding urine culture to the diagnostic algorithm. The study included 449 pregnant women with suspected urinary tract infections: 18.0% (81/449) had positive urine culture findings. If antibiotics were administered following urine dipstick results alone, 368 women would have received antibiotics unnecessarily: an overprescription rate of 82% (368/449). If administration was based on urine culture findings plus urinary tract infection symptoms, 144 of 368 women with negative urine culture findings would have received antibiotics unnecessarily: an overprescription rate of 39.1% (144/368). The additional cost of urine culture was 0.48euros per woman. A high proportion of pregnant women with suspected urinary tract infections from refugee camps unnecessarily received antibiotics. Including urine culture in diagnosis, which is affordable in Lebanon, would greatly reduce antibiotic overprescription. Similar approaches could be adopted in other regions where microbiology laboratories are accessible.

The Effect of Antibiotic Therapy Before Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy on the Frequency of Postoperative Complications: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is commonly used in the treatment of large renal stones. Postoperative infections are a common consequence of these procedures. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of antibiotic therapy before PCNL on the possibility of developing fever and common complications after the procedure. Methods: We carried out a retrospective cross-sectional study involving 708 patients who had undergone PCNL at Razi Hospital in Rasht, covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Patients were allocated into two groups: Group 1 included 454 patients who had received antibiotic therapy, and group 2 included 254 patients who had not received pre-operative antibiotic therapy. Results: In group 1, there were 241 males (53.1%) and 213 females (46.9%), while in group 2, there were 138 males (54.3%) and 116 females (45.7%). In group 1, 82.7% of patients treated with antibiotics had a negative culture. The hospitalization time was 4.00 ± 1.75 days for group 1 and 2.26 ± 1.56 days for group 2. Fever was observed in 39 patients (11.2%) in group 1. Sepsis was seen in only one patient (0.3%) in group 1. There is a significant relationship between total hospitalization time (P = 0.000), hospitalization after the operation (P = 0.000), hypertension (P = 0.009), ischemic heart disease (P = 0.050), history of shock wave lithotripsy (P = 0.003), hydronephrosis (P = 0.000), age (P = 0.004), and hemoglobin levels (P = 0.000) with antibiotic therapy. Conclusions: Surgeon overprescription of antibiotics may lead to resistance, complicating outcomes and extending hospital stays after PCNL. Some complications remain unaffected by antibiotic therapy due to surgical experience.

Accuracy of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and British Thoracic Society Criteria for Acute Pneumonia in Differentiating Chemical and Bacterial Complications of Aspiration in Comatose Ventilated Patients Following Drug Poisoning.

Drug poisoning frequently leads to admission to intensive care units, often resulting in aspiration, a potentially life-threatening condition if not properly managed. Aspiration can manifest as either bacterial aspiration pneumonia (BAP) or aspiration pneumonitis (AP), which are challenging to distinguish potentially leading to overprescription of antibiotics and the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. This study aims to assess the accuracy of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and British Thoracic Society (BTS) criteria in differentiating BAP from AP in comatose ventilated patients following drug poisoning. This cross-sectional study included 95 patients admitted for drug poisoning at the Lille University Hospital intensive care department, between 2013 and 2017, requiring mechanical ventilation and receiving antibiotics for aspiration. Patients were categorized as having bacterial complications if tracheal sampling yielded positive culture results, and if they were otherwise considered to have chemical complications. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of IDSA and BTS criteria in identifying patients with bacterial complications were evaluated. Among the patients, 34 (36%) experienced BAP. The IDSA criteria demonstrated a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 33%, while the BTS criteria showed a sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 38%. Both the IDSA and BTS criteria exhibited poor sensitivity and specificity in identifying microbiologically confirmed pneumonia in comatose ventilated patients following drug poisoning.

Does the Addition of Point-of-Care Testing Alter Antibiotic Prescribing Decisions When Patients Present with Acute Sore Throat to Primary Care? A Prospective Test of Change.

Accurate clinical diagnosis of patients presenting to primary care settings with acute sore throat remains challenging, often resulting in the over-prescribing of antibiotics. Using point-of-care tests (POCTs) to differentiate between respiratory infections is well-accepted, yet evidence on the application within primary care is sparse. We assessed the application of testing patients (n = 160) from three family practices with suspected Streptococcal infections using rapid molecular tests (ID NOW Strep A2, Abbott). In addition to comparing clinical evaluation and prescription rates with either usual care or testing, patients and staff completed a questionnaire about their experience of molecular POCT in primary care. The immediate availability of the result was important to patients (100%), and staff (≈90%) stated that molecular testing improved the quality of care. Interestingly, only 22.73% of patients with a Centor score > 2 tested positive for Strep A and, overall, less than 50% of Centor scores 3 and 4 tested positive for Strep A with the ID NOW testing platform. The addition of rapid molecular POCTs to clinical assessment resulted in a 55-65% reduction in immediate and deferred antibiotic prescriptions. The intervention was popular with patients and medical staff but was associated with increased cost and a longer appointment length.

Dental antimicrobial stewardship: a qualitative study of perspectives among Canadian dentistry sector leaders and experts in antimicrobial stewardship.

Dentistry is a significant contributor to the burden of antimicrobial overprescribing and hence to the global problem of antimicrobial resistance. However, antimicrobial stewardship in Canadian dentistry is nascent, with an acknowledged need for research and coordinated stewardship efforts. This study aimed to gain insights into the perspectives of Canadian dentistry sector leaders and experts on the main drivers of dental antibiotic overprescribing and potential stewardship strategies. Exploratory qualitative design. Data collection: four one-time, 1 h focus group discussions with 22 experts and stakeholders in antimicrobial stewardship in Canada, recruited through a mix of purposive and snowball sampling. Data analysis: inductive thematic analysis. The analysis yielded five themes: outdated patterns; antimicrobials as a Band-Aid; fear and risk aversion; behavioural change; and why reinvent the wheel? Overprescription in dentistry stems primarily from a perpetuation of outdated prescribing patterns, ubiquitous use of antibiotics as a temporary solution, and an overly cautious antibiotic use by risk-averse providers. Stewardship strategies should be grounded on behavioural change (motivation, robust data and enactment of new behaviours) and may be modelled after tested medical interventions. This study presents a roadmap for behavioural change in dental antibiotic prescribing, and points to the fact that the success of a stewardship actionable plan for Canadian dentistry may depend more on concerted efforts for change than on the creation of novel strategies. Hence, contextualizing and testing medical stewardship programmes in Canadian dentistry may be effective in combatting antibiotic overprescription, thereby contributing to global efforts to reduce antimicrobial resistance.

Antibiotic Over-Prescription by Dentists in the Treatment of Apical Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the global pattern of antibiotic prescription in the treatment of apical disease. PRISMA Guidelines were followed to carry out this systematic review. The research question was as follows: What is the pattern of antibiotic prescription by dentists in the treatment of the different clinical forms of apical periodontitis? A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE/PubMed, Wiley Online Database, Web of Science and Scopus. All studies reporting data about the pattern of antibiotic prescription by dentists in the treatment of apical disease were included. The meta-analyses were calculated using the Open Meta Analyst version 10.10 software. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. The search strategy identified 96 articles and thirty-nine cross-sectional studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The overall percentage of antibiotic prescriptions by dentists in cases of symptomatic AP was 25.8%, and 31.5% in cases of asymptomatic AP with sinus tract present. The percentage of dentists prescribing antibiotics in cases of acute apical abscess with no/mild symptoms was 47.7%, whereas, in cases of acute apical abscess with moderate/severe symptoms, 88.8% of dentists would prescribe antibiotics. Endodontists prescribe antibiotics at a lower rate than general practitioners. The total risk of bias was considered moderate, and the final rating for the certainty of the evidence was low. Dentists worldwide are over-prescribing antibiotics in the management of apical disease. It is necessary to improve antibiotic prescribing habits in the treatment of endodontic infections, as well as educational initiatives to encourage the rational and appropriate prescription of antibiotics in periapical diseases.

Stop in Time: How to Reduce Unnecessary Antibiotics in Newborns with Late-Onset Sepsis in Neonatal Intensive Care.

The fear of missing sepsis episodes in neonates frequently leads to indiscriminate use of antibiotics, and prescription program optimization is suggested for reducing this inappropriate usage. While different authors have studied how to reduce antibiotic overprescription in the case of early onset sepsis episodes, with different approaches being available, less is known about late-onset sepsis episodes. Biomarkers (such as C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, interleukin-6 and 8, and presepsin) can play a crucial role in the prompt diagnosis of late-onset sepsis, but their role in antimicrobial stewardship should be further studied, given that different factors can influence their levels and newborns can be subjected to prolonged therapy if their levels are expected to return to zero. To date, procalcitonin has the best evidence of performance in this sense, as extrapolated from research on early onset cases, but more studies and protocols for biomarker-guided antibiotic stewardship are needed. Blood cultures (BCs) are considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of sepsis: positive BC rates in neonatal sepsis workups have been reported as low, implying that the majority of treated neonates may receive unneeded drugs. New identification methods can increase the accuracy of BCs and guide antibiotic de-escalation. To date, after 36-48 h, if BCs are negative and the baby is clinically stable, antibiotics should be stopped. In this narrative review, we provide a summary of current knowledge on the optimum approach to reduce antibiotic pressure in late-onset sepsis in neonates.