anti-VEGF Injections Research Articles

Safety and Efficiency of Anti-VEGF with Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Non-Ischemic Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Prospective, Case-controlled, Cohort Study.

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF combined with dexamethasone implant for the retinal vein occlusion patients with macular edema. In this prospective, case-controlled, cohort clinical trial (Register ID: ChiCTR2400080048), patients with non-ischemic retinal vein occlusion were enrolled from the Sanmenxia Central Hospital from August 2020 to April 2023. The patients were randomized into two groups. All the patients received ranibizumab intravitreal injection in the first 3 consecutive months. For the ranibizumab group, anti-VEGF injections were as needed thereafter in case of recurrence of macular edema; For the combination group, the patients received an intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection at 15 days after the first ranibizumab injection. The primary outcome measurements were improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reduction in central macular thickness (CMT). The secondary outcomes were recurrence of macular edema, number of intravitreal injections, and injection interval. Safety profiles were also recorded. A total of 124 patients were included, of which 73 patients completed all follow-ups. Both the ranibizumab monotherapy and the combination therapy significantly improved BCVA at all time points, compared to the baseline. The combined group achieved more BCVA improvement in 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, compared to the ranibizumab alone group. Compared to the baseline, both groups achieved significant reductions in CMT at all follow-ups. However, the combination group showed more CMT reduction at 1 week post injection, compared to the ranibizumab group. The combination group had a significantly longer injection interval, lower injection time, and recurrence of macular edema. Ocular hypertension was the most common adverse events. Lastly, intraocular pressure was all well controlled by 1-3 glaucoma medications without surgical intervention. The combination therapy could significantly improve the BCVA and reduce the CMT with a good safety profile.

Dexamethasone implant for refractory macular edema secondary to diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusion.

To evaluate the efficacy, timing of retreatment and safety of dexamethasone (DEX) implant on macular edema (ME) secondary to diabetic retinopathy (DME) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO-ME) patients who were refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. This retrospective study included 37 eyes received at least one DEX implant treatment for DME or RVO-ME between January 1, 2019, and January 1, 2023. These refractory DME and RVO-ME cases received at least 5 anti-VEGF injections and failure to gain more than 5 letters or a significant reduction in central retinal thickness (CRT). The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CRT were measured at baseline, and at 1, 3, 4 and 6mo post-DEX implant injection. Adverse events such as elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and cataract were recorded. For RVO cases (n=22), there was a significant increase in BCVA from 0.27±0.19 to 0.35±0.20 at 6mo post-DEX injection (P<0.05) and CRT decreased from 472.1±90.6 to 240.5±39.0 µm at 6mo (P<0.0001). DME cases (n=15) experienced an improvement in BCVA from 0.26±0.15 to 0.43±0.20 at 6mo post-DEX implant injection (P=0.0098), with CRT reducing from 445.7±55.7 to 271.7±34.1 µm at 6mo (P<0.0001). Elevated IOP occurred in 45.9% of patients but was well-controlled with topical medications. No cases of cataract or other adverse events were reported. DEX implants effectively improve BCVA and reduce CRT in refractory DME and RVO-ME. Further research with larger cohorts and longer follow-up periods is needed to confirm these findings and assess long-term outcomes.

Punctate inner choroiditis and choroidal neovascular membrane formation following vitreoretinal surgery: A case report.

To report a case of punctate inner choroiditis (PIC) and subsequent choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM) development in a young, high myope following vitreoretinal surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. A 44-year-old male with high myopia underwent pars plana vitrectomy for subtotal retinal detachment in the left eye, followed by cataract extraction and silicone oil removal. Three years postoperatively, he presented with blurred vision, and fundus examination revealed PIC lesions at the posterior pole. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) showed characteristic features of PIC, including hyperreflective nodule-like elevations, disrupted ellipsoid and interdigitation zones, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) elevations and increased choroidal hyper transmission signals. Initially, no treatment was initiated, and the patient was monitored. Three years later, the patient experienced further vision loss, and fundus examination showed progression of PIC lesions and new CNVM formation in the left eye. The patient was treated with systemic corticosteroids and an intravitreal anti-VEGF injection (Razumab® 0.5 mg/0.05 ml). Three weeks after the intervention, SD-OCT showed regression of the CNVM, and the patient's visual symptoms improved. This case underscores the importance of long-term follow-up and timely intervention in managing PIC, especially in high myopes post-retinal surgery. Early identification and treatment with systemic corticosteroids and anti-VEGF therapy are crucial to preserving visual function and preventing severe complications like CNVM.

Real-world six-month outcomes in patients switched to faricimab following partial response to anti-VEGF therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema.

Landmark studies reported on faricimab efficacy and safety predominantly in treatment naïve patients, but outcomes following switch from other anti-VEGF therapies are lacking. We evaluated patients switched to faricimab who hadpreviously shown a partial response to other anti-VEGF injections for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Retrospective study at the Oxford Eye Hospital. Patients switched to faricimab from January to April 2023 with six months follow-up were identified via electronic medical records. A total of 116 patients (151 eyes) were included. In 88 patients with nAMD (107 eyes), mean visual acuity remained stable: 62±17 ETDRS letters at baseline; 62±18 at six months (p > 0.05). Central subfield thickness (CST) reduced from 294 ± 73 μm to 270 ± 53 μm (p < 0.05) at six months. Subretinal or intraretinal fluid was present in 102 eyes (95%) at baseline and 75 eyes (70%) at follow-up (p < 0.05). Pigment epithelial detachment height decreased from 233 ± 134 μm to 188 ± 147 μm (p < 0.05). Mean treatment interval increased by 1.7 weeks (p < 0.05) and was extended in 61 eyes (57%) at six months. In 28 patients with DMO (44 eyes), visual acuity remained stable: 69 ± 15 letters at baseline; 70±15 at six months (p > 0.05). CST reduced from 355 ± 87 μm to 317 ± 82 μm (p < 0.05). Mean treatment interval increased by 1.4 weeks (p < 0.05) and was extended in 21 eyes (46%) by six months. Switching to faricimab in treatment resistant eyes led to improved anatomical response and extended treatment interval in a significant proportion of patients. Ongoing review of real-world data will inform longer-term outcomes of safety and effectiveness.

Treatment Options in Bilateral Diffuse Uveal Melanocytic Proliferation (BDUMP): Case Presentation and Review of the Literature

ABSTRACT Purpose To outline the therapeutic approach for a rare case of Bilateral Diffuse Uveal Melanocytic Proliferation (BDUMP) and examine the current management recommendations of this uncommon condition. Methods-Results Literature review on the current treatment options in BDUMP cases. An 82-year-old woman was referred to our clinic due to bilateral visual loss. She was treated elsewhere with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) in both eyes for presumed choroidal neovascularization (CNV) without improvement. Her past medical history (PMH) entailed colon cancer, treated with surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy 15 years ago. The patient presented with low visual acuity in both eyes, multiple oval orange patches in the fundus with striking hyperfluorescent pattern in fluorescein angiography (FA), giraffe pattern in fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and rapidly progressive cataracts. Intravitreal dexamethasone implants were administered with mild improvement and subretinal fluid absorption. Conclusions The management strategy in BDUMP should focus on the systemic, often occult malignancy. There is no standard treatment protocol for BDUMP; however, plasmapheresis in combination with primary malignancy treatment seems to yield promising results in current literature reports. Anti-VEGF injections failed to control BDUMP sequelae, however intravitreal dexamethasone implants may offer temporary relief.

Submacular Hemorrhage Rates Following Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections for Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Objective: To examine rates of submacular hemorrhage in patients undergoing anti-VEGF injections, comparing rates between specific anti-VEGF agents. Design: Retrospective clinical cohort study. Participants: All patients in the database from January 2015-November 2023 with a diagnosis of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and accompanying submacular hemorrhage (SMH). Methods: SMH prevalence and associated anti-VEGF injection type were analyzed in 140,915 eyes (of which 9,107 had SMH) in a nationwide aggregated electronic health care database using chi-square test of proportion. Visual acuity (VA) data was assessed using 2-sample independent t-tests. The primary outcome was rate of SMH per injection type. Secondary datapoints examined were time between SMH diagnosis and last anti-VEGF injection, number of injections before SMH, treatment interval at time of SMH, VA before and at 12 months after SMH, eyes undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) within 30 days of SMH, and VA before PPV and at 12 months after PPV. Results: The last injection type in eyes with SMH was bevacizumab in 3,439 (37.8%) eyes, brolucizumab-dbII in 46 (0.51%) eyes, aflibercept in 3,221 (35.4%) eyes, ranibizumab in 2,246 (24.7%) eyes, and faricimab-svoa in 155 (1.7%) eyes. Rates of SMH were significantly higher (p≤0.001) for last injection with bevacizumab compared to every other injection type. Rates of SMH were significantly lower (p=0.0004) for last injection with faricimab-svoa compared to every other injection type. Patients receiving either faricimab-svoa or ranibizumab injections each had significantly shorter (mean and standard deviation (SD) 48.9 (27.9), p<0.02; mean and standard deviation (SD) 59.6 (38.2), p=0.003, respectively) mean time between SMH diagnosis and last injection than did patients undergoing any other injection. Mean VA before SMH and at 12 months after SMH did not significantly differ by injection type among all patients. The number of patients who underwent PPV were 52 (1.51%) for bevacizumab, 4 (8.7%) for brolucizumab-dbII, 58 (1.8%) for aflibercept, 41 (1.8%) for ranibizumab, and 3 (1.9%) for faricimab-svoa. Mean VA before SMH and at 12 months after SMH did not significantly differ by injection type in patients undergoing PPV. Conclusions: Faricimab may be more protective than other anti-VEGF injections against SMH in patients with nAMD.

Therapies for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

To assess the safety and efficacy of the multiple therapeutic modalities for the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). A literature search of English-language studies in the PubMed database with no date restrictions was last conducted in May 2024. The combined searches yielded 612 citations, 31 of which were selected for full-text review and for inclusion in this assessment. The panel methodologist assigned a level of evidence rating to each study. Six were assigned a level I rating, 23 were assigned a level II rating, and 2 were assigned a level III rating. Studies were categorized based on treatment modalities: laser-based therapy, intravitreal therapy, laser-based therapy versus intravitreal therapy, and systemic therapies. Within those categories, they were separated based on treatments for acute versus chronic CSCR. One level I study showed that photodynamic therapy (PDT) using half-dose verteporfin for acute CSCR led to a significant decrease in subretinal fluid (SRF) with 95% of treated patients having no SRF at 12 months compared with 58% of untreated eyes with acute CSCR (P= 0.001). Anatomically, the mean CFT at 1 year was significantly lower in the treated group (161 ± 65 μm) versus the observation group (278 ± 92 μm) (P= 0.001). A second level I study compared half-dose verteporfin PDT versus 30%-dose verteporfin PDT and found that 94.6% in the half-dose PDT group had no SRF at 12 months compared with 75.4% in the 30%-dose PDT group (P= 0.004). The noninferiority of the 30%-dose PDT compared with half-dose PDT was not demonstrated. The VICI trial was a level I study that found no benefit with the use of mineralocorticoid antagonism with eplerenone for the treatment of chronic CSCR. With respect to the primary outcome of visual acuity (VA), the VICI trial found no significant difference at 12 months: 79.5 letters in the placebo group and 80.4 letters in the eplerenone group (P= 0.24). In general, the results from the other evaluated studies were inconsistent and thus inconclusive. There were no level I studies that supported the role of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections or systemic beta-blockers for patients with CSCR. A small level I study showed potential efficacy of Helicobacter pylori therapy for CSCR. There is evidence to support half-dose PDT for the treatment of acute CSCR regarding anatomic improvement, but less robust evidence supports improvement in VA or sustained anatomic benefit beyond 12 months. Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and oral beta-blockers demonstrate inconsistent anatomic and visual benefits in patients with CSCR. The mineralocorticoid antagonist eplerenone has not been demonstrated as efficacious for treatment of chronic CSCR. The treatment of H.pylori infection may have some anatomic and visual benefit in the treatment of either acute or chronic CSCR. Acute CSCR resolves spontaneously without treatment in most eyes. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Full thickness macular hole after intravitreal brolucizumab injection in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

To describe a case of full thickness macular hole after intravitreal brolucizumab injection in neovascular age-related macular degeneration, which has not been reported to date. A 65-year-old male patient received brolucizumab intravitreal injection therapy for neovascular macular degeneration of the right eye. He received multiple intravitreal anti-VEGF injections on a pro re nata regimen and developed a full thickness macular hole. Surgical treatment was performed with pars plana vitrectomy of the right eye. Full thickness macular hole was successfully treated. Although a full thickness macular hole following intravitreal brolucizumab injection is an uncommon complication, it requires caution.

Anterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Injection for Refractory Macular Edema: A Retrospective Case Series.

To evaluate the effectiveness of anterior subtenon triamcinolone (AST) injections in the management of refractory macular edema. This is a retrospective case series of consecutive eyes with refractory macular edema treated with AST at a single vitreoretinal surgeon's practice at Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada in 2018-2023. Refractory was defined as persistent macular edema with a central subfield thickness of 250μm or greater over a 24-week period, receiving at least four intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. Vision outcomes and optical coherence tomography features for all eyes were compared for three visits pre-AST treatment and two visits post-AST treatment. Ninety-three patients (119 eyes; diabetic macular edema (26%), and pseudophakic CME (74%), with a mean follow-up duration of 161 days were included. The presence of subretinal fluid (p=0.0013), central subfield macular thickness (p<0.0001), cube average thickness (p=0.0024) and macular cube volume (p= 0.0017) significantly improved from pre-AST to post-AST treatment. Visual acuity also significantly improved from pre-AST treatment to post-AST treatment (p<0.0001). There was no significant change in the intraocular pressures from pre-AST to post-AST (p=0.7920) and no complications were noted throughout the follow-up period. The findings from this study suggest that AST injections show modest improvement in anatomical and functional outcomes, and are safe for the treatment and management of refractory macular edema.

Clinical Observation of Micropulse Laser Combined with Conbercept in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration with Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED)

The aim of this study is to observe the efficacy of micropulse laser combined with Conbercept in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) complicated with PED. Thirty patients (30 eyes) diagnosed with nAMD and PED at our hospital in 2023 were randomly divided into two groups: the Conbercept treatment (IVC) group with 15 cases (15 eyes) and the Conbercept combined with 577 nm threshold micropulse laser treatment (IVC+SMLP) group with 15 cases (15 eyes). Anti-VEGF treatment was administered according to the 3+PRN regimen, and the combined treatment group received 577 nm threshold micropulse laser treatment within 2 weeks after anti-VEGF injection. Follow-up observed the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), PED height (PEDH), number of injections, and related complications at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after Conbercept intravitreal injection. The average BCVA, CMT, and PEDH in both groups improved significantly from baseline at all time points (P &lt; 0.05). At 12 months of follow-up, PEDH in the IVC+SMLP group decreased significantly from baseline (293.57±82.59 vs 184.84±33.95) and was significantly lower than in the IVC group (P &lt; 0.05). The number of IVC injections in the IVC group was significantly higher than in the IVC+SMLP group (8.04±0.3 vs 5.29±1.26) with a significant difference (t=4.290, P=0.016). No treatment-related adverse events were observed during the study. The 577 nm threshold micropulse laser combined with Conbercept effectively improves or stabilizes visual function and anatomical morphology in nAMD with PED, reduces the number of intravitreal injections, and alleviates the patient's economic burden to some extent.

Quantitative Evaluation of Type 1 and Type 2 Choroidal Neovascularization Components Under Treatment With Projection-Resolved OCT Angiography.

To evaluate the response of type 1 and type 2 macular neovascularization (MNV) components under anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using projection-resolved optical coherence tomography angiography (PR-OCTA). This retrospective study included eyes with treatment-naïve exudative AMD treated with anti-VEGF injections under a pro re nata (PRN) protocol over 1 year. Two-dimensional MNV areas and three-dimensional MNV volumes were derived from macular PR-OCTA scans using an automated convolutional neural network. MNV was detected as flow signal within the outer retinal slab. Type 1 components and type 2 components were analyzed separately. Of 17 enrolled eyes, 12 eyes were pure type 1 MNV and five eyes were type 2 MNV. In eyes with pure type 1, the total (sum of type 1 and type 2 components) MNV area and volume did not change from baseline to 6 months or 12 months (P > 0.05). In eyes with type 2 MNV, the total MNV area significantly decreased from the baseline to 6 months (P = 0.0074) and 12 months (P = 0.014). The total type 2 MNV volume also decreased from baseline visit to visits at 6 months and at 12 months, nearing statistical signifiicance (P = 0.061 and P = 0.074). In eyes with type 2 MNV, the type 1 component increased from 0.093 mm2 to 0.30 mm2 (P = 0.058), and the type 2 component decreased from 0.37 mm2 at 6 months to 0 at 12 months (P = 0.0087). Type 1 and type 2 MNV may have different response under PRN anti-VEGF treatment over 1 year.

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant in Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Pretreated Diabetic Macular Edema-A Swiss Cohort Study.

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a significant cause of visual impairment, often treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. However, some patients do not respond adequately to this treatment. This study aims to evaluate the contribution of the intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant as a second-line treatment in DME patients with insufficient response to anti-VEGF therapy or with high treatment burden. This retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted across seven clinical sites in Switzerland. The study included eyes with active DME that had been pretreated with anti-VEGF for at least six months before receiving DEX therapy. Data were extracted from electronic patient records, focusing on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and injection frequency. A total of 95 eyes from 89 patients (38.8% females, mean age 65.6 ± 9.1 years, follow-up time 80.6 ± 38.5 [13.5-166.7] months) were analyzed. Prior to the first DEX implant, eyes had undergone an average of 16.0 ± 13.3 anti-VEGF injections over 32.5 ± 22.4 months. Post-DEX treatment, 22.1% of eyes received DEX monotherapy, 44.2% received a combination of DEX and anti-VEGF, 25.3% continued with anti-VEGF monotherapy, and 8.4% received no further treatment. The number of anti-VEGF injections decreased significantly from 6.4 ± 3.1 in the year before DEX to 1.6 ± 2.4 in the year after DEX (p < 0.001). BCVA remained stable (0.4 ± 0.3 logMAR at baseline, 0.4 ± 0.5 logMAR at 24 months, p = 0.2), while CST improved from 477.7 ± 141.0 to 320.4 ± 125.5 μm (p < 0.001), and the presence of retinal fluid decreased from 98.0% to 61.1% (p = 0.021). During follow-up, 26.3% of eyes required glaucoma medication, 4.2% underwent glaucoma surgery, and 1.1% needed cataract surgery. In real-world clinical settings, the addition of DEX to anti-VEGF therapy in DME patients significantly reduces treatment burden and retinal fluid while maintaining visual function. Treatment decisions should balance anatomical and functional outcomes, considering individual patient needs.

The I-OPTA Questionnaire: A National Assessment of Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is the leading cause of irreversible vision loss in developed countries. However, a significant gap persists in understanding this population, exacerbated by their advanced age and visual impairments, which can hinder research participation and access to healthcare. The purpose of this study was to describe the content of the questionnaire and the participating patients with nAMD. The survey includes patients diagnosed with nAMD who had previously received treatment or were currently undergoing intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections. Participants were recruited using various methods, as reaching out to patients who are no longer receiving treatment poses a particular challenge. A patient and public advisory board assisted throughout the study period. Of the 713 electronic invitations sent out, 494 (69.3%) patients responded to the questionnaire, with an additional 57 responses obtained through e-mail or telephone interviews. Due to the exclusion of 16 responses, there were a total of 535 valid responses, including 176 from patients previously treated and 359 from those currently undergoing treatment for nAMD. The median age of respondents was 79.9years (interquartile range [IQR] 75.5-84.7), with 59.8% being women. Among them, 53.2% were married, while 43.1% lived alone. Data from the I-OPTA (Identification of Patient-Reported Barriers in Treatment for nAMD) questionnaire allows future exploration of patients who are no longer receiving treatment, patients' knowledge about preventive measures, and the impact of nAMD on visual function and quality of life. Future research, including studies that integrate data from corresponding retinal images and Danish national registers, has the potential to generate invaluable knowledge, providing benefits to both patients and healthcare professionals.

Evaluation of Foveal Vasculature by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography after Pan-Retinal Photocoagulation versus Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injections.

This study aimed to compare macular vascular changes one and three months after treatment with either panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) or intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB). A total of 62 eyes with very severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy or early proliferative diabetic retinopathy without center-involved diabetic macular edema, were included in this retrospective study. Thirty-nine eyes were allocated to the PRP group, while 23 eyes were treated with IVB. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) was performed to measure foveal avascular zone (FAZ) characteristics as well as the densities of superficial and deep capillary plexuses (SCP and DCP). In the IVB group, the FAZ area and perimeter expanded at month one but returned to baseline level after three months. In the PRP group, however, the FAZ area and perimeter were rather steady. Changes in the FAZ area were significantly different between the treatment groups at month one (P = 0.02), but not at month three (P = 0.31). There was no significant difference in the change in FAZ circularity index between the two groups at each time point (P = 0.55 and P = 0.31). Similarly, changes in SCP density were not statistically significant between the two groups at both time points (all Ps 0.05). A comparison of the two treatment arms based on the mean change in DCP density revealed a significant difference at month one, but not at month three (P = 0.01 and P = 0.49, respectively). Although bevacizumab and PRP have different short-term macular vascular responses, both therapies have the ability to normalize or stabilize vascular measures over time.

Laser Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy: History, Mechanism, and Novel Technologies.

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR), as a complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), remains a significant contributor to preventable vision impairment in the working-age population. Laser photocoagulation is essential in treating DR in conjunction with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection, steroids, and vitrectomy. This review summarizes the history of laser photocoagulation and highlights its current role and long-term effectiveness in real-world conditions. Methods: The National Clinical Trial (NCT), PubMed, Google Scholar, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched utilizing combined or individual keywords, and a total of 121 articles were reviewed by the authors. Results: Several novel laser photocoagulation technologies, such as patterned scanning laser, subthreshold micropulse laser, navigated laser, multimodal imaging-guided laser, and retina rejuvenation therapy, substantially decrease the adverse effects and improve the accuracy and security of laser therapy. Numerous studies have demonstrated the outstanding clinical efficacy of combination therapies with pharmacologic treatments like anti-VEGF in treating DR and diabetic macular edema (DME). A 20-year follow-up retrospective study in our center preliminarily demonstrated the long-term effectiveness of conventional laser photocoagulation. Conclusions: More clinical trials are required to confirm the clinical effectiveness of novel laser technologies. Better treatment protocols for the combination therapy may be detailed. Anti-VEGF treatment has better effects, especially for DME and in a short period. But in real-world conditions, given the long-term effectiveness and economic advantages of conventional laser treatment, it should be prioritized over anti-VEGF injection in certain situations.

Bedside bilateral sequential intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for retinopathy of prematurity.

To evaluate the outcome and ocular adverse events of bedside bilateral sequential intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) (BBSIR). This retrospective interventional study included infants who received BBSIR with a follow-up of at least 1 month. Clinical history, intravitreal injection details, indications, intraoperative and postoperative ocular adverse events, and outcomes were analyzed. The study cohort included 192 babies (384 eyes) spread over 9 years. The mean gestational age was 30.2 ± 2.6 weeks (28.8-34.1), and the birth weight was 1098.11 ± 271.65 g (650-2000). The indications for BBSIR were as follows: 73.4% (n = 141 infants) were too sick to transfer to an ophthalmic unit, 10.9% (n = 21 infants) due to the parents' inconvenience of traveling to the ophthalmic center, and 15. 6% (n = 30 infants) due to both reasons. The injections were given by an ROP specialist/ROP-trained ophthalmologist after due parental consent, considering each eye as a fresh eye with separate scrubbing and draping. Light from the head-worn indirect ophthalmoscope served as the source of illumination. The retinopathy was regressing/regressed in 92.4% of babies until the last follow-up. The major ocular complication was cataract in 2 eyes (0.5%). There was no incidence of endophthalmitis till last follow-up (median 5.7 months). As per this study, BBSIR was observed to be effective and safe if given by those fully trained in the management of ROP. Though the rate of complications like cataract is small, they can pose management challenges and impact vision in a growing child.

Intravitreal Antibiotics versus Early Vitrectomy plus Intravitreal Antibiotics for Post-Injection Endophthalmitis: an IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight)

PurposeTo determine if intravitreal injection of antibiotics alone versus early pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) plus injection of intravitreal antibiotics predicted better or worse visual outcomes for patients with endophthalmitis after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections. DesignRetrospective cohort study ParticipantsPatients developing endophthalmitis after receiving an intravitreal anti-VEGF injection from the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry between 2016 and 2020. MethodsInclusion criteria were endophthalmitis diagnosis within 1 to 28 days after anti-VEGF injection and a recorded visual acuity (VA) at baseline, on the day of diagnosis, and post-treatment. Patients in the Injection Only group underwent intravitreal injection of antibiotics alone and in the Early Vitrectomy group received PPV with intravitreal antibiotics or intravitreal injection followed by PPV within 2 days of diagnosis. Patients were excluded if they had cataract surgery during the study, intravitreal steroids before endophthalmitis, or intermediate/posterior uveitis or cystoid macular edema. The study created a 1:1 matched cohort using Mahalanobis Distance Matching, accounting for the differences in VA at baseline and diagnosis. Main Outcome MeasuresPost-treatment logMAR VA Results1,044 patients diagnosed with post-injection endophthalmitis met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the unmatched cohort, there were 935 patients in the Injection Only and 109 in the Early Vitrectomy group. In 1:1 matched cohort 218 patients (109 in each group) were included; the median logMAR VAs were 0.32 [20/40-20/50] at baseline, 0.88 [∼20/150] at diagnosis, and 0.57 [20/70-20/80] post-treatment. There were no statistically significant differences in the visual outcomes between the two matched treatment groups (b = 0.05, p = 0.23); including the subgroup of patients with VA worse than 1.0 logMAR (b = 0.05, p = 0.452). ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in final VA outcomes between patients receiving Injection Only and those treated with Early Vitrectomy for post-injection endophthalmitis. The findings support the use of either treatment strategy.

Clinical Outcomes and Experiences with Prefilled Syringes Versus Vials for Intravitreal Administration of Anti-VEGF Treatments: A Systematic Review.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents have been the standard treatment for retinal diseases for almost two decades. These treatments are administered via intravitreal injection using single-use vials or prefilled syringes (PFS). In this systematic review, we evaluate health care resource use and clinical outcomes and experiences with PFS for intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF treatments. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2015 to February 8, 2024 to identify literature reporting outcomes regarding procedural efficiency, health care resource use, patient and clinician experiences, and safety for currently approved anti-VEGFs (ranibizumab, aflibercept, brolucizumab) administered using PFS. Comparators were vial-based injections of the same anti-VEGFs. A total of 36 publications met the criteria for inclusion in the systematic literature review; the majority were non-randomized studies, with a small number of reviews, case series, survey studies, and opinion articles. Publications reported that preparation times were significantly shorter for PFS (40.3-57.9s) versus vials (ranibizumab, 62.8-98.0s; aflibercept, 71.9-79.5s), with no differences in product stability between PFS and vials. Clinicians expressed a preference for PFS and thought PFS were faster, easier to use, and had increased safety versus vials. Publications consistently reported significantly lower rates of endophthalmitis per injection with PFS versus vials (ranibizumab PFS, 0-0.02%; aflibercept PFS, 0.01-0.02%; ranibizumab vial, 0.02-0.05%; aflibercept vial, 0.02-0.06%). Four publications reported increased rates of transient vision loss after aflibercept PFS injection versus vial-based injection. No publications reported outcomes regarding health care resource use or patient experiences. The available literature supports the increased procedural efficiency of PFS versus vial-based intravitreal injection of anti-VEGFs. PFS are positively perceived by clinicians and have a safety benefit in the form of a decreased risk of endophthalmitis versus vials.

Visual and Anatomic Responses in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and a Suboptimal Response to Anti-VEGF Therapy Switched to Faricimab

Purpose: To determine the efficacy of switching to intravitreal (IVT) faricimab in patients with treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and determine the rates of reversion to original antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients with nAMD and persistent fluid on optical coherence tomography previously treated with anti-VEGF injections who received at least 1 IVT faricimab injection between March 1, 2022, and January 31, 2023. Results: The study comprised 135 eyes of 119 patients. Before switching to IVT faricimab, the mean number of anti-VEGF injections in the previous 12 months was 10.7 ± 2.6 (SD) with a mean interval of 4.8 ± 1.3 weeks (range, 2-8). The mean follow-up was 11.6 ± 2 months. Thirty eyes (22.2%) switched to IVT faricimab returned to the original therapy. Of 105 eyes remaining on IVT faricimab, 66 (62.9%) had no fluid at the last follow-up. Compared with the original treatment, there was a significant improvement in logMAR visual acuity at the last follow-up in eyes on IVT faricimab (0.42 vs 0.38; P &lt; .01) and in central subfield thickness (286 µm vs 246 µm; P &lt; .0001). There was also a significant increase in the dosing interval after the third injection vs before IVT faricimab was prescribed (4.8 weeks vs 5.5 weeks; P &lt; .001). Conclusions: Faricimab has a potent drying effect and potential for increasing the injection interval in many eyes with nAMD and persistent fluid on other anti-VEGF agents. Although nearly 25% of eyes reverted to the original therapy because of an insufficient response or adverse events, the majority did not achieve fluid resolution after reversion.

Topographical Quantification of Retinal Fluid in Type 3 MNV and Associations With Short-Term Visual Outcomes

PurposeThis study aims to quantify the volume of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and sub-retinal pigment epithelium (sub-RPE) fluid in treatment-naïve Type 3 macular neovascularization (MNV) eyes with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and to investigate the correlation of these fluid volumes with visual acuity (VA) outcomes at baseline and following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. DesignRetrospective, clinical cohort study. MethodsIn this study, we analyzed patients diagnosed with exudative AMD and treatment-naïve Type 3 MNV undergoing a loading dose of anti-VEGF therapy. Using a validated deep-learning segmentation strategy, we processed optical coherence tomography (OCT) B-scans to segment and quantify IRF (i.e., both in the inner and outer retina), SRF, and sub-RPE fluid volumes at baseline. The study correlated baseline fluid volumes with baseline and short-term VA outcomes post-loading dose of anti-VEGF injections. ResultsForty-six eyes from 46 patients were included in this study. Visual acuity was 0.51±0.30 LogMAR at baseline and 0.33±0.20 LogMAR after the loading dose of anti-VEGF (p=0.001). Visual acuity at the follow-up visit was 0.40±0.17 LogMAR in patients with no complete resolution of retinal fluid and 0.31±0.20 LogMAR in eyes without retinal fluid after treatment (P=0.225). In the multivariable analysis, the IRF volume in the inner retina (P=0.032) and the distance of the MNV from the fovea (P=0.037) were predictors of visual acuity at baseline. The baseline IRF volume in the inner retina also predicted the visual acuity at follow-up (p=0.023). ConclusionThe present study highlights the fluid volume in the inner retina as a crucial predictor of short-term visual outcomes in Type 3 MNV, underscoring the detrimental effect of IRF on neuroretinal structures.