Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Research Articles

Prolonged clinical response is possible with regorafenib in refractory osteosarcoma: A case report

<b>Background:</b> Treatment options for metastatic unresectable osteosarcoma are limited, and there is no standard approach after the failure of first-line chemotherapy. Conventional chemotherapy in the second and subsequent lines typically yield a median progression-free survival (PFS) of less than 4 months, with objective response rates ranging from 3 to 29%. The activity of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in bone sarcomas has been demonstrated. We present a case of metastatic osteosarcoma exhibiting a durable response to regorafenib treatment.<br /> <b>Case: </b>We discuss a 30-year-old male with metastatic osteosarcoma who had extensive bone and lung metastases and was ineligible for metastasectomy. The patient had received all active chemotherapy regimens in the early and metastatic stages except ifosfamide. Next generation sequencing analysis of resected tumor tissue revealed a possibly pathogenic missense mutation (P.G472E) in NOTCH1 gene. Due to the presence of heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction, chemotherapy was not considered, and regorafenib was initiated. After four cycles of regorafenib, a partial metabolic response was achieved. The patient was followed up without progression under regorafenib for 15 months, without requiring dose reduction. Unfortunately, the treatment had to be interrupted for an extended period due to challenges with recurrent tumor infection and the necessity for repeated surgeries. Following successful wound site control, we restarted full-dose regorafenib and achieved a metabolic partial response again.<br /> <b>Conclusion: </b>To our knowledge, this case represents the longest achieved PFS with regorafenib in metastatic osteosarcoma. TKIs can provide a durable clinical response in metastatic osteosarcoma patients. Clinical and molecular biomarkers are required to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from these treatments.

Targeted anti-cancer agents and risk of venous thromboembolism.

The incidence of one-year venous thromboembolism (VTE) after cancer diagnosis is reported to be increasing for several types of cancer. The introduction of targeted anti-cancer therapies and immunotherapy into the therapeutic armamentarium of medical oncologists contributed to the significantly improved response rates and survival times of cancer patients. In recent years, a potential prothrombotic effect of several targeted anti-cancer agents and immunotherapy drugs has been suggested; however, the methodological limitations of clinical trials evaluating the possible role of these classes of drugs on the VTE risk often make the interpretation of their results difficult. It is still not clear whether the increased risk of VTE is more closely correlated to the expression of specific oncogenic profiles than to the administration of specific therapies against these mutations. Furthermore, the increased survival rates observed with these agents could influence the prevalence of VTE events in cancer patients by the competing risk mortality on the risk of VTE. To date, the available data have suggested that the risk of VTE varies among different categories of targeted therapy, being most reported for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), monoclonal antibodies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and less reported for tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). The risk of VTE seems to significantly increase when targeted therapy is administered in combination with traditional anti-cancer agents. Considering the uncertainties in estimating the rate of thrombotic complications associated with targeted therapy, the need for antithrombotic prophylaxis in cancer patients receiving targeted therapies still needs to be specifically assessed. In this review, we examine available evidence of the literature and the methodological limitations of clinical trials, and we discuss the potential future perspectives.

RE: Combining antivascular endothelial growth factor and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies: randomized phase II study of irinotecan and cetuximab with/without ramucirumab in second-line colorectal cancer (ECOG-ACRIN E7208).

RE: Combining antivascular endothelial growth factor and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies: randomized phase II study of irinotecan and cetuximab with/without ramucirumab in second-line colorectal cancer (ECOG-ACRIN E7208).

Safety and tolerability of immune checkpoint inhibitors in people with HIV infection and cancer: insights from the national prospective real-world OncoVIHAC ANRS CO24 cohort study

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been a major advance in cancer management. However, we still lack prospective real-world data regarding their usage in people with HIV infection (PWH).MethodsThe ANRS CO24...

Investigating the Efficacy of EGFR-TKIs and Anti-VEGFR Combination in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) agents have shown improved survival outcomes in recent studies. However, its efficacy related to survival outcomes as a first- or second-line agent and based on generations remains to be explored. This study estimated the survival outcomes of EGFR-TKIs plus anti-VEGFR in combination in defined populations of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients overall, as a first- or second line of treatment, with different generations of EGFR-TKIs and EGFR-TKIs plus bevacizumab combination as a subgroup. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases through June 2023 to identify primary research reporting the survival outcomes of EGFR-TKIs in combination with anti-VEGFR agents in patients with advanced NSCLC. Studies that were single-arm, published in non-English languages, and had missing data on survival outcomes were excluded. A meta-analysis was conducted to generate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Methodological quality and risk of bias in studies were assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions risk of bias tool. A total of 20 randomized controlled trials were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 11 (2182 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Patients' median age ranged from 58 to 68 years; 36% to 70% of patients were female; most of them had IIIa/b to IV stage cancer. In meta-analyses, the EGFR-TKIs plus anti-VEGFR combination resulted in improved PFS (HR, 0.73; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.86; p < 0.00001) in patients with advanced NSCLC but had no impact on OS (HR, 0.93; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.10; p = 0.41). The first line of treatment and first-generation EGFR-TKIs with the combination also improved the PFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI: 0.57, 0.71; p < 0.00001; HR, 0.63; 95% CI: 0.56, 0.71; p < 0.00001) respectively, however, had no impact on OS. Our meta-analysis indicated EGFR-TKIs with anti-VEGFR in combination not only improved overall PFS but also showed similar results to a first line and first-generation agent compared to EGFR-TKI alone.

Using capillary electrophoresis sodium dodecyl sulfate (CE-SDS) and liquid chromatograph mass spectrometry (LC-MS) to identify glycosylated heavy chain heterogeneity in the anti-VEGFR-2 monoclonal antibody.

The size variant, which can be measured by capillary electrophoresis sodium dodecyl sulfate (CE-SDS), is a critical quality attribute of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The CE-SDS size heterogeneity can hardly be identified by tandem mass spectrometry, which is an intractable obstacle of mAb development and quality control across the industry. We analyzed the purity of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) mAb, an antagonist of the human VEGFR-2, through reduced CE-SDS and observed glycosylated heavy chain heterogeneity. The heterogeneity has potential impact on safety, efficacy, and stability of drugs for clinical use. Therefore, it should be characterized so as to evaluate its potential risk. In order to identify the heterogeneity, we used mass spectrometry to confirm that the molecular size heterogeneity was not due to peptide bond cleavage in the heavy chain. Subsequently, we employed mass-spectrometry-glycosylation profiling and CE-SDS analysis of various glycosidase-treated samples, in addition to the preparation of mAb references with different glycoforms. Ultimately, we demonstrated that the heavy chain heterogeneity was induced by different levels of galactosylation modifications which will potentially impact the efficacy of antibody drugs (i.e., complement-dependent cytotoxicity). In this study, potential risk caused by heavy chain size heterogeneity was evaluated, which addressed the obstacle of mAb development and quality control. Therefore, this study offers a feasible approach for the investigation and identification of heavy chain heterogeneity in reduced CE-SDS, providing a novel strategy for mAb quality control and evaluation.

A novel nanobody-based immunocytokine of a mutant interleukin-2 as a potential cancer therapeutic

The immunotherapeutic application of interleukin-2 (IL-2) in cancer treatment is limited by its off-target effects on different cell populations and insufficient activation of anti-tumor effector cells at the site of the tumor upon tolerated doses. Targeting IL-2 to the tumor microenvironment by generating antibody-cytokine fusion proteins (immunocytokine) would be a promising approach to increase efficacy without associated toxicity. In this study, a novel nanobody-based immunocytokine is developed by the fusion of a mutant (m) IL-2 with a decreased affinity toward CD25 to an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR2) specific nanobody, denoted as VGRmIL2-IC. The antigen binding, cell proliferation, IFN-γ-secretion, and cytotoxicity of this new immunocytokine are evaluated and compared to mIL-2 alone. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic properties are analyzed. Flow cytometry analysis shows that the VGRmIL2-IC molecule can selectively target VEGFR2-positive cells. The results reveal that the immunocytokine is comparable to mIL-2 alone in the stimulation of Primary Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) and cytotoxicity in in vitro conditions. In vivo studies demonstrate improved pharmacokinetic properties of VGRmIL2-IC in comparison to the wild or mutant IL-2 proteins. The results presented here suggest VGRmIL2-IC could be considered a candidate for the treatment of VEGFR2-positive tumors.

Effect of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in advanced gastric cancer according to the status of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression.

Ramucirumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb), inhibits angiogenesis and reduces tumor activity. Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) might act upon VEGFR2 to induce cancer cell angiogenesis and metastasis. Herein, we investigated the efficacy of combining ramucirumab and paclitaxel according to the status of PD-L1 expression in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This analysis included AGC patients who received ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as 2nd line therapy between December 1, 2018, and February 28, 2022, at Samsung Medical Center. All patient data analyses included an evaluation of PD-L1 expression using the combined positive score (CPS). We analyzed the efficacy and the survival of patients according to their PD-L1 expression. We included 117 patients in this analysis, and 80 patients (68.4%) had a PD-L1 CPS of one or more, 37 (31.6%) had five or more, and 19 (16.2%) had ten or more scores. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly between patients with a PD-L1 CPS of less than one and one or more {PD-L1 <1% vs. PD-L1 ≥1%; PFS: median 3.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-4.8 months] vs. median 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.5-4.7 months), P=0.93; PD-L1 <1% vs. PD-L1 ≥1%; OS: median 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.4-8.6 months) vs. median 8.1 months (95% CI: 6.4-9.8 months), P=0.32}. PFS and OS did not differ significantly between patients with a PD-L1 CPS of less than 5 and 5 or more [PD-L1 <5% vs. PD-L1 ≥5%; PFS: 3.9 months (95% CI: 3.3-4.5 months) vs. 4.4 months (95% CI: 3.0-5.8 months), P=0.57; OS: 7.4 months (95% CI: 6.5-8.3 months) vs. 10.0 months (95% CI: 1.1-18.9 months), P=0.07]. Interestingly, with a PD-L1 CPS cutoff of 10, PFS and OS did differ significantly [PD-L1 <10% vs. PD-L1 ≥10%; PFS: 3.8 months (95% CI: 3.3-4.3 months) vs. 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.1-7.3 months), P=0.05; OS: 7.2 months (95% CI: 6.5-7.9 months) vs. 18.9 months (95% CI: 6.5-31.3 months), P=0.04]. No biomarkers have been established to predict survival times after ramucirumab plus paclitaxel treatment. This analysis suggests that a PD-L1 CPS cutoff of 10 might be novel a biomarker to predict the survival of AGC patients treated with ramucirumab and paclitaxel.

Fibroblast growth factor inhibition by molecular-targeted agents mitigates immunosuppressive tissue microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma

Background & aimsCombination immunotherapy refers to the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and molecular-targeted agents (MTA), which have recently been approved for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Owing to its relatively low antitumor effect (up to 30%), sequential therapy following ICIs treatment is required in patients with HCC. This study aimed to determine the impact of MTAs on the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME).MethodsWe established immune syngeneic orthotopic HCC mouse models using Hep-55.1C and Hep-53.4, and treated them with MTAs (lenvatinib, sorafenib, regorafenib, cabozantinib, and DC101 as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antibodies, and AZD4547 as a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-1/2/3/4 inhibitor) for 2 weeks. Subsequently, alterations in the TIME caused by MTAs were evaluated using immunohistochemistry (antibodies for CD3, CD8, Foxp3, Granzyme B, Arginase-1, NK1.1, F4/80, CD11c, PD-1, and PD-L1). We conducted RNA-seq analysis using lenvatinib- and AZD4547-treated tumors. To confirm the clinical relevance of these findings, we analyzed the transcriptome data of human HCC cells (MHCC-97H) treated with various concentrations of lenvatinib for 24 h using RNA-seq data from the Gene Expression Omnibus database.ResultsThe number of Foxp3- and F4/80-positive cells in the TIME was decreased in many MTAs. Cabozantinib increased the numbers in NK1.1-, Granzyme B, and CD11c-positive cells. Lenvatinib and AZD4547 increased the number of CD8, Granzyme B, and PD-L1-positive cells. Gene ontology enrichment analysis revealed that lipid metabolism-related genes were downregulated by lenvatinib and AZD4547. In total, 161 genes downregulated by FGFR inhibition in rodent models overlapped with those downregulated by lenvatinib in human HCC cells.ConclusionsIn this study, we showed that cabozantinib activated the innate immune system, and lenvatinib and AZD4547, which commonly inhibit FGFR signaling, altered TIME to a hot immune state by downregulating lipid metabolism-related genes. These findings support the therapeutic use of combination immunotherapies.

Serous Maculopathy Due to Aspecific Choroidopathy (SMACH).

Serous Maculopathy Due to Aspecific Choroidopathy (SMACH).

Effect of 1 H-NMR serum lipoproteins on immunotherapy response in advanced triple-negative breast cancer patients.

We previously reported the results of a phase II trial of anti-PD-1 antibody plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 inhibitors and eribulin in heavily pretreated advanced triple-negative breast cancer with a favorable objective response rate (ORR) of 37.0% (NCT04303741). Here we report updated survival outcomes and serum metabolite changes of the study. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to detect metabolite dynamics and explore biomarkers for response. We found that treatment-sensitive patients had higher very low-density lipoprotein-related metabolite expression at baseline. A lipid proteomics model consisting of six metabolites predicted ORR and progression-free survival at 6 months with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.88 and 0.87, respectively. Serum asparagine and sarcosine concentrations were significantly higher after treatment in treatment-resistant patients. In conclusion, we constructed a model consisting of six metabolites to identify patients who benefit more from the triplet treatment, and asparagine and sarcosine may be associated with treatment resistance.

OPtimal Treatment by Invoking biologic clusters in renal cell carcinoma (OPTIC RCC)

Abstract Background The first-line treatment for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) includes immune oncology (IO) based combination therapy. The current standard includes a PD-1 inhibitor plus either an anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor (IO/IO) or an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGF TKI) (IO/TKI). Currently, there is no evidence to guide a physician’s choice between an IO/IO versus an IO/TKI combination. The phase III IMmotion 151 trial performed RNA-seq from 823 ccRCC tumors and established seven biologically distinct gene expression clusters of ccRCC (Motzer and Rini et al., Cancer Cell 2020). The seven clusters showed differential responses to immune checkpoint inhibitor and may serve as a predictive biomarker to select clusters to assign patients with mccRCC to either an IO/IO (ipilimumab/ nivolumab) or an IO/TKI (nivolumab/cabozantinib) regimen. Methods Patients diagnosed with mccRCC without prior systemic therapy (including in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting) and at least one measurable lesion as defined by RECIST 1.1 are eligible for enrollment. RNA-seq will be performed on metastatic tumor specimens and used to assign tumor clusters. Patients with cluster 1/2 tumors will be assigned to the nivolumab/cabozantinib arm. Patients with cluster 4/5 tumors will be assigned to the ipilimumab/nivolumab arm. Cluster 3/6/7 will be excluded. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Key secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, depth of response &amp;gt;80%, and rate of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The hypothesis is that use of tumor clusters to assign front-line therapy to either nivolumab/cabozantinib or ipilimumab/nivolumab will lead to a 20% greater ORR compared to unselected historical controls in CheckMate 9ER (ORR 55%) or CheckMate 214 (ORR: 40%). This trial adopts Simon’s MiniMax two-stage design (power: 80%, one-sided alpha: 0.1). For the nivolumab/cabozantinib arm, stage I will enroll 12 eligible patients. If there are 7 or more responders in the first 12 patients, stage II will enroll an additional 14 patients (n=26). For the ipilimumab/ nivolumab arm, stage I will enroll 16 eligible patients. If there are 7 or more responders in the first 16, stage II will enroll an additional 12 patients (n=28). The primary endpoint will be met if there are 15 or more responders (ORR&amp;gt;60%). This trial is open and enrolling with 12 patients on study at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and additional sites to open including UT Southwestern, City of Hope, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, and Cleveland Clinic. This trial is funded by the Department of Defense Kidney Cancer Research Program Clinical Trial Award (W81XWH-22-1-1033) (NCT05361720). CDMRP DOD Funding: yes

A protocol of a single arm, prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II study of ramucirumab and erlotinib in treatment-naïve non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutation and brain metastases (SPIRAL-BRAIN study).

The combination of erlotinib, a first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), and ramucirumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) antibody, is one of the most effective treatments for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and EGFR mutation. However, little is known about the safety and efficacy of this combination treatment for patients with brain metastases. This single arm, prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II study will recruit 32 NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation (except for T790M mutation) and brain metastases (asymptomatic or mild symptoms). Patients will be treated with erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg/body once daily and ramucirumab at a dose of 10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is intracranial overall response rate (iORR) and the secondary endpoints are intracranial disease control rate, intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), extracranial ORR, extracranial PFS, ORR, overall PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. The planned number of enrollments was calculated based on a one-sample binomial test (normal approximation) with a two-sided α level of 5% and 80% power, assuming that the expected iORR is 65% and the iORR threshold is 40%. A prospective study to confirm the safety and efficacy of the combined erlotinib plus ramucirumab treatment for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation and brain metastases is ongoing. Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs051220059.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor in colorectal cancer: A review

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor in colorectal cancer: A review

Real-world Outcome of Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma and Intermediate- or Poor-risk International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium Criteria Treated by Immune-oncology Combinations: Differential Effectiveness by Risk Group?

BackgroundRenal c carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common urinary cancers worldwide, with a predicted increase in incidence in the coming years. Immunotherapy, as a single agent, in doublets, or in combination with anti–vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has rapidly become a cornerstone of the RCC therapeutic scenario, but no head-to-head comparisons have been made. In this setting, real-world evidence emerges as a cornerstone to guide clinical decisions. ObjectiveThe objective of this retrospective study was to assess the outcome of patients treated with first-line immune combinations or immune oncology (IO)-TKIs for advanced RCC. Design, setting, and participantsData from 930 patients, 654 intermediate risk and 276 poor risk, were collected retrospectively from 58 centers in 20 countries. Special data such as sarcomatoid differentiation, body mass index, prior nephrectomy, and metastatic localization, in addition to biochemical data such as hemoglobin, platelets, calcium, lactate dehydrogenase, neutrophils, and radiological response by investigator's criteria, were collected. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisOverall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median follow-up was calculated by the inverse Kaplan-Meier method. Results and limitationsThe median follow-up time was 18.7 mo. In the 654 intermediate-risk patients, the median OS and PFS were significantly longer in patients with the intermediate than in those with the poor International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria (38.9 vs 17.3 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI] p < 0.001, and 17.3 vs 11.6 mo, 95% CI p < 0.001, respectively). In the intermediate-risk subgroup, the OS was 55.7 mo (95% CI 31.4–55.7) and 40.2 mo (95% CI 29.6–51.6) in patients treated with IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations, respectively (p = 0.047). PFS was 30.7 mo (95% CI 16.5–55.7) and 13.2 mo (95% CI 29.6–51.6) in intermediate-risk patients treated with IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations, respectively (p < 0.001). In the poor-risk subgroup, the median OS and PFS did not show a statistically significant difference between IO + IO and IO + TKI. Our study presents several limitations, mainly due to its retrospective nature. ConclusionsOur results showed differences between the IO + TKI and IO + IO combinations in intermediate-risk patients. A clear association with longer PFS and OS in favor of patients who received the IO + TKI combinations compared with the IO-IO combination was observed. Instead, in the poor-risk group, we observed no significant difference in PFS or OS between patients who received different combinations. Patient summaryRenal cancer is one of the most frequent genitourinary tumors. Treatment is currently based on immunotherapy combinations or immunotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but there are no comparisons between these.In this study, we have analyzed the clinical course of 930 patients from 58 centers in 20 countries around the world. We aimed to analyze the differences between the two main treatment strategies, combination of two immunotherapies versus immunotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy, and found in real-life data that intermediate-risk patients (approximately 60% of patients with metastatic renal cancer) seem to benefit more from the combination of immunotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy than from double immunotherapy. No such differences were found in poor-risk patients. This may have important implications in daily practice decision-making for these patients.

Impact of ramucirumab pharmacokinetics in combination with docetaxel on the efficacy and survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

ObjectivesRamucirumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antibody, has been approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, its pharmacokinetic properties in clinical practice are unknown. We aimed to measure ramucirumab concentrations and conduct a retrospective pharmacokinetic analysis using real-world data. Materials and MethodsPatients with stage III–IV and recurrent NSCLC who received ramucirumab plus docetaxel were evaluated in this study. After the first administration, the ramucirumab trough concentration (Ctrough) was measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Patient characteristics, adverse events, tumor response, and survival time were retrospectively extracted from medical records from August 2, 2016 to July 16, 2021. ResultsA total of 131 patients were examined to assess serum ramucirumab concentrations. Ctrough ranged from below the lower limit of quantification (BLQ) to 48.8 µg/mL (BLQ ≤ 1st quartile (Q1) ≤ 7.34, 7.34 < 2nd quartile (Q2) ≤ 14.7, 14.7 < 3rd quartile (Q3) ≤ 21.9 and 21.9 < 4th quartile (Q4) ≤ 48.8 µg/mL). The overall response rate was significantly higher in Q2–4 than that in Q1 (p = 0.011). The median progression-free survival was marginally longer, and overall survival was significantly longer in Q2–4 (p = 0.009). The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) in Q1 was significantly higher than in Q2–4 (p = 0.034) and associated with Ctrough (p = 0.002). ConclusionPatients with higher ramucirumab exposure had a high ORR and prolonged survival time, whereas patients with lower ramucirumab exposure were characterized by a high GPS and poor prognosis. Cachexia may reduce the exposure level of ramucirumab in certain patients, reducing the clinical benefits of ramucirumab treatment.

Middle East and North Africa Registry to Characterize Rate of RAS Testing Status in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Rat sarcoma virus mutational status guides first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. This study was a multi center, multi-country ambispective, observational study in the Middle East and North Africa assessing regional rat sarcoma virus testing practices in newly diagnosed patients. The retrospective arm (2011-2014) included adults with metastatic colorectal cancer who had initiated first-line therapy with ≥1 post-baseline visit and survival data. The prospective arm (2014-2019) enrolled newly diagnosed patients with histologically proven metastatic colorectal cancer with ≥1 measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and tissue availability for biomarker analysis. Data look-back and follow-up were 2 years; the rate of RAS mutation was evaluated. RAS testing was ordered for patients in retrospective (326/417) and prospective (407/500) studies. In the former, testing was typically prescribed after first-line treatment initiation, significantly more in patients with stage IV disease (P < .005), resulting in the addition of targeted therapy (41.8% anti-epidermal growth factor receptor, 30.2% anti-vascular endothelial growth factor) in wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, and significantly impacted the treatment of left-sided tumors (P = .037). In the latter, 58.4% were RAS wild-type; 41.6% were RAS mutant. Non-prescription of RAS testing was attributed to test unavailability, financial, or medical rea sons; predictors of testing prescription were older age, primary tumor in ascending colon, and high tumor grade. RAS status knowledge resulted in the addition of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (20.4%) or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy (21.2%). Before 2014, RAS testing in patients with colorectal cancer in the Middle East and North Africa was often performed after first-line treatment. Testing is more routine in newly diagnosed patients, potentially shifting early treatment patterns.

Angiogenic inhibitor pre-administration improves the therapeutic effects of immunotherapy.

In lung cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are often inadequate for tumor growth inhibition. Angiogenic inhibitors (AIs) are required to normalize tumor vasculature for improved immune cell infiltration. However, in clinical practice, ICIs and cytotoxic antineoplastic agents are simultaneously administered with an AI when tumor vessels are abnormal. Therefore, we examined the effects of pre-administering an AI for lung cancer immunotherapy in a mouse lung cancer model. Using DC101, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) monoclonal antibody, a murine subcutaneous Lewis lung cancer (LLC) model was used to determine the timing of vascular normalization. Microvessel density (MVD), pericyte coverage, tissue hypoxia, and CD8-positive cell infiltration were analyzed. The effects of an ICI and paclitaxel after DC101 pre-administration were investigated. On Day 3, increased pericyte coverage and alleviated tumor hypoxia represented the highest vascular normalization. CD8+ T-cell infiltration was also highest on Day 3. When combined with an ICI, DC101 pre-administration significantly reduced PD-L1 expression. When combined with an ICI and paclitaxel, only DC101 pre-administration significantly inhibited tumor growth, but simultaneous administration did not. AI pre-administration, and not simultaneous administration, may increase the therapeutic effects of ICIs due to improved immune cell infiltration.

NRG-GI004/SWOG-S1610: Colorectal Cancer Metastatic dMMR Immuno-Therapy (COMMIT) study—A randomized phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy versus mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab/atezo in the first-line treatment of patients (pts) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

TPS258 Background: Despite the superiority in progression-free survival (PFS) of inhibition of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway in dMMR/MSI-H as compared to chemotherapy with either anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFr) or anti-epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibodies in mCRC, more pts had progressive disease as the best response in the anti-PD1 monotherapy arm (29.4% v 12.3%) with mean PFS of 13.7 mos, with ~45% of pts in the immunotherapy arm progressed at 12 mos (KEYNOTE 177). We hypothesize that dMMR/MSI-H mCRC pts may be more effectively treated with the combination of PD-1 pathway blockade and mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (bev) rather than with anti-PD-1 therapy (atezo) alone. Preclinical work demonstrated synergistic effects between anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF and between oxaliplatin/anti-PD-1 in murine CRC models and phase II data, which showed activity of anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF in chemotherapy refractory colon cancer. A recent randomized trial subgroup analysis of 8 pts with dMMR metastatic colon cancer treated with FOLFOXIRI+bev+atezo, with the first patient having progression ~16 mos (AtezoTRIBE). Additionally, in other solid tumor malignancies, anti-PD1 plus anti-VEGFr (i.e., HCC and RCC) as well as anti-PD1 plus chemotherapy (i.e., gastric and esophageal cancers) combinations are standard first-line treatments. Methods: The redesigned COMMIT study was reactivated on 1/29/2021 as a two-arm prospective phase III open-label trial randomizing (1:1) mCRC dMMR/MSI-H to atezo monotherapy v mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo combination. Assuming our control arm, atezo monotherapy (48% PFS at 24 mos as assessed by site investigator), we have 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.6 (equivalent to 64.4% PFS at 24 mos) with alpha 0.025 one-sided. Stratification factors include BRAFV600E status, metastatic site, and prior adjuvant CRC therapy. Secondary endpoints include OS, objective response rate, safety profile, disease control rate, and duration of response. Health-related quality of life is an exploratory objective. Archived tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. Key inclusion criteria are: mCRC without prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; dMMR tumor determined by local CLIA-certified IHC assay (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2) or MSI-H by local CLIA-certified PCR or NGS panel; and measurable disease per RECIST. Enrollment actively continues to the target accrual of 211 patients randomized between the two immunotherapy arms. Clinical trial: NCT02997228. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, -180888, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067; Genentech, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT05080673 .

Long term anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor treatment impairs renal function in renal cell carcinoma

Long term anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor treatment impairs renal function in renal cell carcinoma