Anti-immobility Effect Of Fluoxetine Research Articles

Differential involvement of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B/1D receptors in human interferon-alpha-induced immobility in the mouse forced swimming test

Although Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha, CAS 9008-11-1) is a powerful drug in treating several viral infections and certain tumors, a considerable amount of neuropsychiatric side-effects such as depression and anxiety are an unavoidable consequence. Combination with the selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine (CAS 56296-78-7) significantly improved the situation. However, the potential 5-HT(1A) receptor- and 5-HT(1B) receptor-signals involved in the antidepressant effects are still unclear. The effects of 5-HT(1A) receptor- and 5-HT(1B) receptor signals were analyzed by using the mouse forced swimming test (FST), a predictive test of antidepressant-like action. The present results indicated that (1) fluoxetine (administrated intragastrically, 30 mg/kg; not subactive dose: 15 mg/kg) significantly reduced IFN-alpha-induced increase of the immobility time in the forced swimming test; (2) 5-HT(1A) receptor- and 5-HT(1B) receptor ligands alone or in combination had no effects on IFN-alpha-induced increase of the immobility time in the FST; (3) surprisingly, WAY 100635 (5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, 634908-75-1) and 8-OH-DPAT(5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, CAS 78950-78-4) markedly enhanced the antidepressant effect of fluoxetine at the subactive dose (15 mg/kg, i. g.) on the IFN-alpha-treated mice in the FST. Further investigations showed that fluoxetine combined with WAY 100635 and 8-OH-DPAT failed to produce antidepressant effects in the FST. (4) Co-application of CGS 12066A (5-HT(1B) receptor agonist, CAS 109028-09-3) or GR 127935 (5-HT(1B/1D) receptor antagonist, CAS 148642-42-6) with fluoxetine had no synergistic effects on the IFN-alpha-induced increase of immobility time in FST. (5) Interestingly, co-administration of GR 127935, WAY 100635 and fluoxetine significantly reduced the IFN-alpha-induced increase in immobility time of FST, being more effective than co-administration of WAY 100635 and fluoxetine. All results suggest that (1) compared to the 5-HT(1B) receptor, the 5-HT(1A) receptor signal plays the dominant role in improving the anti-immobility effect of fluoxetine in the IFN-alpha-induced depression; (2) combination of the 5-HT(1A) antagonist with subactive fluoxetine can be helpful in IFN-alpha-induced depression treatment.

Is dopamine implicated in the antidepressant-like effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the mouse forced swimming test?

Microdialysis, binding and behavioural studies have shown that the dopaminergic system plays a role in antidepressant treatment. The present study determined whether the antidepressant-like effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors measured in the mouse forced swimming test are mediated via dopamine receptors. Male Swiss mice were randomly assigned to groups of 24 animals and injected IP with citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, sertraline, or paroxetine alone or in combination with the dopamine D(1)agonist SKF 38393, the D(1) antagonist SCH 23390, the D(2) agonist bromocriptine, the D(2) antagonist sulpiride, the D(3) agonist PD 128 907, or the D(3) antagonist nafadotride. The anti-immobility effects of paroxetine, fluvoxamine and citalopram were increased by co-administration of SKF 38393 (0.5 and 2 mg/kg), SCH 23390 (0.06 mg/kg), bromocriptine (0.5 and 2 mg/kg) or PD 128 907 (1 and 2 mg/kg), and were attenuated by SCH 23390 (0.5 mg/kg). The anti-immobility effects of paroxetine and fluvoxamine were also increased with sulpiride (0.5 and 2 mg/kg). The anti-immobility effect of fluoxetine was increased by SKF 38393 (2 mg/kg) and PD 128 907(1 and 2 mg/kg) co-administration. The anti-immobility effect of sertraline (16 mg/kg) was increased by SKF 38393 (0.5 mg/kg), bromocriptine (2 mg/kg) and PD 128 907 (2 mg/kg) and the effect of sertraline (2 mg/kg) was increased by bromocriptine (2 mg/kg). The anti-immobility effect of paroxetine (4 mg/kg) was increased by nafadotride (2 mg/kg). These data indicate that the antidepressant activity of various SSRIs involves different dopamine receptor subtypes and that the serotoninergic and dopaminergic systems interact with each other.

Is dopamine implicated in the antidepressant-like effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the mouse forced swimming test?

Rationale: Microdialysis, binding and behavioural studies have shown that the dopaminergic system plays a role in antidepressant treatment. Objectives: The present study determined whether the antidepressant-like effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors measured in the mouse forced swimming test are mediated via dopamine receptors. Methods: Male Swiss mice were randomly assigned to groups of 24 animals and injected IP with citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, sertraline, or paroxetine alone or in combination with the dopamine D1 agonist SKF 38393, the D1 antagonist SCH 23390, the D2 agonist bromocriptine, the D2 antagonist sulpiride, the D3 agonist PD 128 907, or the D3 antagonist nafadotride. Results: The anti-immobility effects of paroxetine, fluvoxamine and citalopram were increased by co-administration of SKF 38393 (0.5 and 2 mg/kg), SCH 23390 (0.06 mg/kg), bromocriptine (0.5 and 2 mg/kg) or PD 128 907 (1 and 2 mg/kg), and were attenuated by SCH 23390 (0.5 mg/kg). The anti-immobility effects of paroxetine and fluvoxamine were also increased with sulpiride (0.5 and 2 mg/kg). The anti-immobility effect of fluoxetine was increased by SKF 38393 (2 mg/kg) and PD 128 907(1 and 2 mg/kg) co-administration. The anti-immobility effect of sertraline (16 mg/kg) was increased by SKF 38393 (0.5 mg/kg), bromocriptine (2 mg/kg) and PD 128 907 (2 mg/kg) and the effect of sertraline (2 mg/kg) was increased by bromocriptine (2 mg/kg). The anti-immobility effect of paroxetine (4 mg/kg) was increased by nafadotride (2 mg/kg). Conclusions: These data indicate that the antidepressant activity of various SSRIs involves different dopamine receptor subtypes and that the serotoninergic and dopaminergic systems interact with each other.