Background: Infection with parenterally transmitted viruses, such as hepatitis B and C viruses, is tho-ught to be more common in patients with type 2 diabetes for several reasons. Diabetic foot ulcers are a serious complication of diabetes that can lead to more frequent hospital admissions, longer hospital stays and the need for more invasive procedures. Given their complicated conditions, we hypothesized that the prevalence of hepatitis B and C infections might be higher in patients with diabetic foot ul-cers. Materials and Methods: A total of 440 patients with type 2 diabetes, 220 with diabetic foot ulcers (group 1) and 220 without (group 2), who were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-HBs and anti-hepatitis C antibodies (anti-HCV), were retrospectively included in the study. Anti-HBs titers <10 IU/mL were defined as lack of protective immunity, titers of 10-99 IU/mL were considered protec-tive, and titers of ≥100 IU/mL were considered high immunity. Results: HBsAg seropositivity was detected in 7 patients (3.2%), both in group 1 and group 2 (p=1.0). The presence of anti-HCV seropositivity was detected in 5 patients (2.3%) in group 1 and in 3 patients (1.4%) in group 2 (p=0.724). A titer of less than 10 mIU/mL of anti-HBs antibody was found in 118 (55.4%) patients in group 1 and in 112 (52.6%) patients in group 2 (p=0.609). Conclusions: No significant differences were observed in HBsAg, anti-HCV, or relative anti-HBs seroposi-tivity between type 2 diabetic patients with and without diabetic foot ulcer. It was found that 54.0% of patients with type 2 diabetes had anti-HBs antibody titers below 10 mIU/mL.
Read full abstract