Purpose: A 68-year-old Caucasian man was seen in the hospital for abnormal LFTs. He carried a diagnosis of HHV-8 related plasmablastic T-cell lymphoma. He had undergone treatment with cyclosporine, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, with initial remission of disease; however, he developed recurrence and was subsequently treated with rituximab 8 months prior to presentation. Before the initiation of chemotherapy, the patient underwent testing for hepatitis B (HBV), which demonstrated he was HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) negative, anti-HBV surface antibody (anti-HBS) positive, and IgM anti-HBV core antibody (anti-HBc IgM) negative. A total anti-HBV core antibody (anti-HBc total) was not checked prior to starting therapy. On the current admission, total bilirubin was 7.9 mg/dL with conjugated fraction of 4.7 mg/dL. AST was elevated to 830 U/L, ALT to 1591 U/L, and alkaline phosphatase to 189 U/L. Serum ANA was positive at a titer of <1:80 and anti-smooth muscle antibody was negative. Ceruloplasmin was noted at 44 mg/dL. Serologies demonstrated HBsAg to be positive, anti-HBs negative, anti-HBc total positive, anti-HBc IgM positive, HBeAg positive, and anti-HBe negative. HBV PCR found 5.81 Log IU viral particles. Furthermore, his hepatitis A virus (HAV) total antibody was positive, and the anti-HAV IgM antibody was reactive. His anti-hepatitis E virus (HEV) IgM antibody was also detected, and anti-HEV IgG was negative. Hepatitis D antibody was negative. Liver biopsy showed irregular hepatic plates with hepatocyte dropout, peri-portal inflammation, multiple apoptotic bodies, and ballooning degeneration. Stage one to two fibrosis was found. Tenofovir 300 mg daily was started for reactivated HBV, and his AST, ALT, and bilirubin declined to normal 16 weeks later. Acute hepatitis resulting from co-infection with multiple hepatotropic viruses may occur. In some instances, the mechanism by which they are contracted and risk factors for their exposure are shared. In the developing world, several case reports and series have described instances where patients presented with serologic evidence for acute infection from both HAV and HEV. These studies have generally been performed in the setting of sporadic cases with clinical syndromes of acute hepatitis. However, the use of serologic testing to establish diagnoses of acute HAV or HEV in these settings is problematic. Serologic tests were designed for cases in which the pretest probability and clinical suspicion for exposure to acute HEV or HAV were high (i.e., epidemic outbreaks or travel to endemic areas). Whether the presence of anti-HAV and HEV in the setting of such sporadic cases are indicative of true co-infection or represent false positive results remains debatable.
Read full abstract