Antifungal Prophylaxis In Patients Research Articles

Use of nebulized liposomal amphotericin B and posaconazole as antifungal prophylaxis in patients with severe SARS-CoV2 infection in intensive care unit.

COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is common and linked with high fatalityrates. To assess the impact on the incidence and outcome of CAPA of an antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) we compared two cohorts of COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) in Brescia, Italy, from January to August 2021. The study cohort included all mechanically ventilated patients observed between April 2021 and August 2021 with SARS-CoV-2-pneumonia, who received AFP with oral posaconazole (200mg every6h) and nebulized liposomalamphotericin B (50mg every2weeks) from ICU admission to 7days after discharge or, if applicable, until tracheostomy removal. The control cohort included COVID-19 patients admitted to the same ICU between January and March 2021 who did not receive any AFP. Subjects with CAPA at ICU admission were excluded. We included 270 patients, of whom 64 (23.7%) received AFP. In patients in the study group, CAPA-related mortality was significantly reduced (29% vs. 48% p = 0.04), as well as the incidence of CAPA (3.1% vs 12.1%, p = 0.03). Patients who developed CAPA were older (mean of 70-y-old vs 63-y-old, p < 0.001). One subject discontinued posaconazole due to anadverse reaction. Among the 46 patients who received it, only one patient reached an effective plasma concentration of posaconazole. AFP was associated with reduced incidence and mortality from CAPA and was well tolerated in patients with severe COVID-19. Posaconazole concentrations below the efficacy threshold in almost all patients may be attributable to drug interactions and prompt further studies to define its clinical significance.

Risk factors for COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) has been reported to be an emerging and potentially fatal complication of severe COVID-19. However, risk factors for CAPA have not been systematically addressed to date. In this systematic review and meta-analysis to identify factors associated with CAPA, we comprehensively searched five medical databases: Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; and the WHO COVID-19 Database. All case-control and cohort studies in adults (aged >18 years) that described at least six cases of CAPA and evaluated any risk factors for CAPA, published from Dec 1, 2019, to July 27, 2023, were screened and assessed for inclusion. Only studies with a control population of COVID-19-positive individuals without aspergillosis were included. Two reviewers independently screened search results and extracted outcome data as summary estimates from eligible studies. The primary outcome was to identify the factors associated with CAPA. Meta-analysis was done with random-effects models, with use of the Mantel-Haenszel method to assess dichotomous outcomes as potential risk factors, or the inverse variance method to assess continuous variables for potential association with CAPA. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots for factors associated with CAPA. The study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022334405. Of 3561 records identified, 27 articles were included in the meta-analysis. 6848 patients with COVID-19 were included, of whom 1324 (19·3%) were diagnosed with CAPA. Diagnosis rates of CAPA ranged from 2·5% (14 of 566 patients) to 47·2% (58 of 123). We identified eight risk factors for CAPA. These factors included pre-existing comorbidities of chronic liver disease (odds ratio [OR] 2·70 [95% CI 1·21-6·04], p=0·02; I2=53%), haematological malignancies (OR 2·47 [1·27-4·83], p=0·008; I2=50%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 2·00 [1·42-2·83], p<0·0001; I2=26%), and cerebrovascular disease (OR 1·31 [1·01-1·71], p=0·05; I2=46%). Use of invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 2·83; 95% CI 1·88-4·24; p<0·0001; I2=69%), use of renal replacement therapy (OR 2·26 [1·76-2·90], p<0·0001; I2=14%), treatment of COVID-19 with interleukin-6 inhibitors (OR 2·88 [1·52-5·43], p=0·001; I2=89%), and treatment of COVID-19 with corticosteroids (OR 1·88 [1·28-2·77], p=0·001; I2=66%) were also associated with CAPA. Patients with CAPA were typically older than those without CAPA (mean age 66·6 years [SD 3·6] vs 63·5 years [5·3]; mean difference 2·90 [1·48-4·33], p<0·0001; I2=86%). The duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with CAPA was longer than in those without CAPA (n=7 studies; mean duration 19·3 days [8·9] vs 13·5 days [6·8]; mean difference 5·53 days [1·30-9·77], p=0·01; I2=88%). In post-hoc analysis, patients with CAPA had higher all-cause mortality than those without CAPA (n=20 studies; OR 2·65 [2·04-3·45], p<0·0001; I2=51%). The identified risk factors for CAPA could eventually be addressed with targeted antifungal prophylaxis in patients with severe COVID-19. None.

Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacokinetics of Posaconazole in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Useful Tools for Antifungal Stewardship

DISCUSSION INTRODUCTION Antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing induction chemotherapy is usually recommended [1]. Few studies described the clinical impact of suboptimal posaconazole plasma concentrations during prophylaxis, which may be associated with a higher risk of invasive fungal infections (IFI) and a strong impact on clinical outcome [2]. ENDPOINT: The primary endpoint of this study was to evaluate weekly posaconazole Cthrough plasma concentration in AML patients treated with induction chemotherapy. Since polymorphisms of genes encoding enzymes, transporters and transcription factors were also analyzed a possible association amongst plasma exposure, genetic polymorphisms, risk of breakthrough infection and clinical outcam was evaluated . MATERIALS AND METODS: This was a prospective, single center study at “City of Health and Science”, Molinette Hospital in Turin, Italy. Adult Patients with AML undergoing induction chemotherapy admitted to Haematological wards, were enrolled between March 2023 and July 2023. Antifungal prophylaxis with oral posaconazole, 300mg bid the first day and 300 mg qd thereafter was given. Biological samples (plasma for posaconazole quantificatication and whole blood for genetics) were obtained for each patient after loading dose and then posaconazole C trough were evaluated weekly (at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days). The Following genes were evaluated: UGT1A1, UGT1A3, ABCB1, ABCG2, ABCC2, ABCB11, SLCO1B1, SLCO1B3, SLC22A6, PXR, CAR, VDR, CYP27B1, CYP24A1, GC. The mortality was assessed at day 28 from hospital admission. Invasive fungal disease (IFD) was defined as the occurence of a proven or probable IFD according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/National insitute of Allergy and Infection Diseases Micoses Study Group Criteria (EORTC/MSG) revised definitions [3]. Furthermore, according to the clinical suspicion of breakthrough infection, the switch from prophylaxis to antifungal therapy was also recorded as well as antifungal restaging before treatment change. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included: 9 were women (45%) with a median age of 67 years old (±10.5) and a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 5 (±1.3). Mean posaconazole C through plasma concentrations are reported in Table 1 and were in range for all the different timepoints. According to EORTC criteria, two patients (10%) had a probable IFI on day 14, and antifungal therapy with liposomal amphotericin B was started [3]. One of those patients had low C trough value at time of suspected breaktrough infection (T 14; 0.2 microg/L 9). The 28 day mortality was 10%, due to the haematological underlying disease. Regarding pharmacogenetic analysis, posaconazole C trough at day 7 and 14 was associated with ABCB1 1236 polymorphism with p=0.022 and p=0.038, respectively. Furthermore, VDR ApaI (p=0.010), VDR TaqI (p=0.023), VDR BsmI (p=0.042), ABCB11 (p=0.023) and UGT1A3 023 (p=0.023) genetic variants were reported in patients with probable IFI. There is a potential impact of the use of posaconazole plasma levels monitoring and associated pharmacogenetics to evaluate the risk of underexposure during antifungal prophylaxis, but also at antifungal restaging before treatment switch. These useful tools may help clinicians to identify patients with a higher risk for under-effective plasma concentrations of posaconazole and can be used to improve antifungal stewardship approach in this setting. The utility of such approaches should also be evaluated in azole-to-azole strategies BIBLIOGRAPHY Olivia White et al. Isavuconazonium or posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2023 May 15;10781552231175825. doi: 10.1177/10781552231175825.Tang LA et al. Risk factors for subtherapeutic levels of posaconazole tablet. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Oct 1;72(10):2902-2905. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx228. PMID: 29091205Peter Donnelly et al. Revision and update of the Consensus definition of Invasive Fungal Disease from the European Organization for Research adn Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses study Group Education and Research Consortium. Clin Infect Dis 2020 Sep 12;71(6):1367-1376. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1008.

Comparative study of posaconazole and voriconazole for primary antifungal prophylaxis in patients with pediatric acute leukemia

Posaconazole and voriconazole are commonly used for preventing invasive fungal disease (IFD), but few studies compared posaconazole with voriconazole for primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP) in pediatric acute leukemia. To compare posaconazole with voriconazole for PAP in pediatric acute leukemia. This retrospective observational study enrolled pediatric patients with non-M3 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) between December 2017 and November 2019 in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. The patients received voriconazole or posaconazole for PAP. The primary outcome was the breakthrough of IFD. The secondary outcome was the overall survival (OS) and IFD-free survival of patients. A total of the 275 patients were enrolled, of which 120 patients taking voriconazole (43.6%) and 155 patients taking posaconazole (56.4%). The breakthrough of IFD occurred in 19 (15.8%) patients taking voriconazole and in 12 (7.7%) patients taking posaconazole (P = 0.035). There was no significant differences in IFD-free survival (P = 0.336) or OS (P = 0.069) between the patients taking voriconazole and posaconazole. In the subgroup of AML patients, the OS of patients taking posaconazole was better than those receiving voriconazole (P = 0.017). Posaconazole and voriconazole were comparable for PAP in patients with pediatric acute leukemia regarding the OS and IFD-free survival, but posaconazole might achieve a lower IFD breakthrough rate.

Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Invasive Fungal Infections in Pancreas Transplant in the Absence of Postoperative Antifungal Prophylaxis

Abstract Background Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) remain a rare yet dreaded complication following pancreas transplantation. Current guidelines recommend antifungal prophylaxis in patients with 1 or more risk factors. At our center, single-dose antifungal prophylaxis is administered in the operating room but none subsequently, regardless of risk factors. Here we evaluate the 1-year incidence, outcome, and risk factors associated with IFI following pancreas transplantation. Methods A retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted in patients who underwent pancreas transplantation between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019. Records were manually reviewed, and cases were adjudicated using consensus definitions. The 1-year cumulative incidence, mortality, and risk factors were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and differences between populations were assessed with Fisher test and Mann-Whitney U test. Results Three hundred sixty-nine recipients were included. Twelve IFIs were identified: candidiasis (8), aspergillosis (2), histoplasmosis (1), and cryptococcosis (1). Intra-abdominal infections were the most common presentation (5), followed by bloodstream infections (3), disseminated disease (2), pulmonary disease (1), and invasive fungal sinusitis (1). Median time to IFI was 64 days (interquartile range, 30–234 days). One-year cumulative incidence was 3.25% (95% confidence interval, 1.86%–5.65%). There were no significant differences between patients with or without IFI regarding type of transplant (P = .17), posttransplant dialysis (P = .3), rejection (P = .5), cytomegalovirus serostatus (P = .45), or reoperation (P = .19). For patients with IFI, the 1-year graft and patient survival rates were 58% versus 95% (P &amp;lt; .0001) and 75% versus 98.6% (P &amp;lt; .001), respectively. Conclusions Our study suggests that the use of a single-dose antifungal prophylaxis administered in the operating room but none subsequently does not result in an increased incidence of IFI following pancreas transplantation.

Primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal diseases in patients with haematological malignancies: 2022 update of the recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO).

Patients with haematological malignancies (HM) are at high risk of developing invasive fungal disease (IFD) with high morbidity and attributable mortality. We reviewed data published until September 2021 to update the 2017 antifungal prophylaxis recommendations of the German Society of Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO). The strong recommendation to administer antifungal prophylaxis in patients with HM with long-lasting neutropenia, i.e. <500 cells/μL for >7 days remains unchanged. Posaconazole remains the drug of choice for mould-active prophylaxis in these patients. Novel treatment options in HM, such as CAR-T-cell treatment or novel targeted therapies for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) were considered, however, data are insufficient to give general recommendations for routine antifungal prophylaxis in these patients. Major changes regarding specific recommendations compared to the 2017 edition are the now moderate instead of mild support for the recommendations of isavuconazole and voriconazole. Furthermore, published evidence on micafungin allows recommending it at moderate strength for its use in HM. For the first time we included recommendations for non-pharmaceutical measures regarding IFD, comprising the use of high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters, smoking, measures during construction work and neutropenic diets. We reviewed the impact of antifungal prophylaxis with triazoles on drug-drug interactions with novel targeted therapies that are metabolized via cytochrome p450 where triazoles inhibit CYP3A4/5. The working group recommends reducing the dose of venetoclax when used concomitantly with strong CYP3A4 inhibiting antifungals. Furthermore, we reviewed data on the prophylactic use of novel antifungal agents. Currently there is no evidence to support their use in a prophylactic setting in clinical practice.

The impact of antifungal prophylaxis in patients diagnosed with acute leukemias undergoing induction chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Acute leukemias are complex diseases to treat and have a high mortality rate. The immunosuppression caused by chemotherapy also causes the patient to become susceptible to a variety of infections, including invasive fungal infections. Protocols established in many countries attempt to prevent these infections through the use of pharmacological antifungal prophylaxis. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the existing evidence for the use of antifungal prophylaxis in patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia, and how prophylaxis can affect treatment response and mortality. Through the use of a population-variable-outcome strategy, keywords were utilized to search online databases. The included studies were selected and the data was collected to develop descriptive results for all studies, and, for studies that met the criteria, a meta-analysis of the Relative Risk (RR) was analyzed for infection rates, in-hospital mortality, and complete remission. A total of 33 studies were included in this systematic review, with most studies presenting positive results (n = 28/33) from the use of antifungal prophylaxis. Using a random effects model, the pooled results of the meta-analysis presented lower invasive fungal infections in AML (RR: 0.527 (95% CI: 0.391; 0.709). p < 0.001). p < 0.001) and ALL (RR: 0.753 (95% CI: 0.574; 0.988). p = 0.041). when antifungal prophylaxis was used. No discernible difference was encountered in the rate of complete remission when using prophylaxis. Antifungal prophylaxis provides a lower risk of invasive fungal infections and in-hospital mortality in acute leukemia patients undergoing induction chemotherapy.

Comparison of Mold Active Triazoles as Primary Antifungal Prophylaxis in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Era of Molecularly Targeted Therapies.

Multiple factors influence the choice of primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing remission induction chemotherapy (RIC) given the recent incorporation of targeted leukemia therapies into these regimens. We evaluated the incidence and characteristics of breakthrough invasive fungal infections (bIFI) in 277 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML undergoing RIC with high-intensity, or low-intensity venetoclax-containing therapy. Patients receiving posaconazole (PCZ), voriconazole (VCZ), or isavuconazole (ISA) for > 5 days as PAP during RIC were included. Echinocandin use prior to, but not concomitantly with, the PAP azole was allowed. IFI (modified EORTC/MSG criteria) occurring after > 5 days of continuous azole exposure or within 14 days of discontinuation were considered bIFI. Proven or probable bIFI were observed in 11 patients (4%). The incidence of bIFI was 2.9% for PCZ, 4.8% for VCZ, and 5.7% for ISA (P = .55). In total, 161 patients (58%) received echinocandin prophylaxis prior to azole initiation. Neither echinocandin exposure nor chemotherapy intensity impacted bIFI rate. Patients with bIFI had a lower rate of absolute neutrophil count recovery > 1000 cells/µL (64% vs 90%, P = .021) or complete remission (CR; 18% vs 66%, P = .002) after RIC. Thirty-eight patients (14%) discontinued PAP due to toxicity, most often hepatotoxicity. Discontinuation due to hepatotoxicity was similar among azoles (PCZ: 13%; VCZ: 15%; ISA: 13%). The rate of bIFI is low during RIC in patients with newly diagnosed AML receiving any of the mold-active triazoles as PAP. Neutrophil recovery and achievement of CR are important for bIFI risk.

Is Posaconazole Really Effective in Adolescent patients as a Prophylactic Agent: Experience of a Tertiary Care Center

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a leading cause of morbidity and death in immunocompromised patients. Data on efficacy and pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in pediatric patients are rare (1 to 5). Herein, we retrospectively analyzed adolescent patients who had received posaconazole as antifungal prophylaxis. We retrospectively analyzed patients who received posaconazole as primary or secondary antifungal prophylaxis. A total of 34 adolescent patients, 19 men (55.9%) and 15 women (44.1%) with a mean age of 15.8±2.1 years were included. Twenty-five of 34 (73.5%) patients were on primary and nine of 34 (26.5%) patients were on secondary antifungal prophylaxis. Diagnosis of the patients receiving posaconazole as primary antifungal prophylaxis were acute myeloid leukemia (n=12, 48%), hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (n=7, 28%), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=5, 20%), and Fanconi aplastic anemia (n=1, 4%). Five patients (55.6%) with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 1 patient with acute myeloid leukemia (11.1%), 1 patient with Fanconi aplastic anemia (11.1%), and 2 (22.2%) patients with chronic granulomatous disease received posaconazole as secondary antifungal prophylaxis. Twelve of 25 (48%) patients receiving posaconazole as primary antifungal prophylaxis were complicated by IFI; 4 of them were proven, 6 probable, and 2 with possible IFI. Three of 9 patients (33.3%) receiving posaconazole as secondary antifungal prophylaxis was complicated by IFI (P=0.29), 2 of them were probable and 1 was possible IFI. Five of 25 patients (20%) receiving posaconazole as primary prophylaxis died because of IFI. Improvement of antifungal prophylaxis in patients with high risk of invasive infections seems clearly necessary, and analyzing serum posaconazole levels and individualizing dosing may be 1 approach to improve outcomes.

742. Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Infections with Isavuconazonium Sulfate versus Voriconazole as Primary Antifungal Prophylaxis in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) who Received Induction Chemotherapy

BackgroundFungal infections in patients with hematologic malignancies are associated with high mortality. Primary antifungal prophylaxis has been shown to be a more effective strategy than treating a documented infection. This retrospective analysis aims to compare the rates of breakthrough invasive fungal infections in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received induction chemotherapy and were prescribed voriconazole (Vori) or isavuconazonium (Isv) for primary antifungal prophylaxis.The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/ Invasive Fungal Infection Cooperative Group and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group criteria was used to categorize incidence of breakthrough invasive fungal infections bIFI into ‘possible’, ‘probable’ or ‘definite’ groups who required treatment with liposomal amphotericin B, echinocandin, and/or different triazole.MethodsThis is a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML. These patients received either Vori or Isv sulfate as the primary antifungal prophylaxis at Moffitt Cancer Center between July 2017 and June 2019. Patients who were over 18 years old and received at least 10 days of uninterrupted primary antifungal prophylaxis with either Vori or Isv sulfate were included in the study. Patients with a history of stem cell or solid organ transplant, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, relapsed AML or who received systematic antifungal, other than fluconazole, therapy within 30 days to induction chemotherapy were excluded.Results250 patients were screened for the study and out of which 118 patients met the above criteria. There was a 20.2% (18/89) break through rate of fungal infections in the Vori arm and 17.2% (5/29) in the Isv arm. In the Vori arm there were 15 possible bIFIs, 3 probable bIFIs and 0 definite bIFIs. In the Isv arm there are 2 possible bIFIs, 2 probable bIFIs and 1 definite bIFIs.ConclusionThere is no significant statistical difference (Using the Fisher Exact test statistic p=1) between the Isv and Vori in patients who received these agents for primary fungal prophylaxis for induction chemotherapy for AML at Moffitt Cancer Center between July 2017 - June 2019.Disclosures Rod Quilitz, Pharm D., Astellas (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Invasive Fungal Infections in Pediatric Patients with High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia during Initial Phases of Therapy: A Retrospective Evaluation

BACKGROUND Patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are at increased risk of infection. While previously published guidelines recommend primary antifungal prophylaxis in patients with T-cell ALL, we sought to determine the pattern of invasive fungal disease (IFI) at our center so as to assess risk factors for IFI, beyond the diagnosis of T-ALL, with the administration of dexamethasone and an anthracycline during induction. The current practice at Children's Health Children's Medical Center Dallas is to provide primary antifungal prophylaxis with micafungin during induction therapy for hospitalized patients with T-cell ALL and those with Down Syndrome. Additionally, we recently decided to provide primary antifungal prophylaxis to patients with HR B-ALL with hyperglycemia who remain hospitalized during induction. The primary objective of this study was to capture the institution-specific five-year incidence of IFI prior to the start of delayed intensification (DI) phase chemotherapy among pediatric patients with ALL. Secondary objectives were to identify potential IFI risk factors specifically amongst pediatric patients with HR ALL. METHODS This retrospective chart review included patients younger than 21 years with newly diagnosed ALL between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2019. Patients with secondary leukemia, infantile leukemia, or those receiving treatment for a fungal infection at presentation were excluded. The primary outcome was the development of probable or proven IFI, as defined by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group criteria, prior to the start of the DI phase of therapy. Statistical methods included Chi-square test, t-test, and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, as appropriate to the variable's level of measurement and distribution. Time series analyses were used to assess overall and seasonal trends of IFI incidence over the study period. RESULTS Of 220 included patients, there were 13 cases of IFI diagnosed during the induction and consolidation phases of therapy during the five-year period. IFI occurred in 15.3% of the HR group (11/72), 5.9% of the T-cell ALL group (1/17), and 0.8% of the standard risk (SR) group (1/131). Among individuals with HR ALL, the majority of cases occurred in the absence of primary antifungal prophylaxis (90.9%). The most common sites of IFI included the lungs (n=6) and sinuses (n=4). Implicated fungal pathogens included Aspergillus, Candida, Curvularia, Exserohilum, and Bipolaris. Univariate analysis of the potential IFI risk factors in HR ALL patients did not identify any significant differences between those patients that did or did not develop IFI, with respect to pre-existing comorbidities, body mass index, laboratory results at diagnosis, or hospital exposures during induction including length of stay, intensive care admissions, and receipt of systemic antibiotics (Table). Race and ethnicity was significantly different likely due to the skewed distribution of IFI among patients who identified as Asian (p = 0.03; 8/8 identified as Asian and did not develop IFI). With respect to seasonality of ALL diagnosis, the percent of patients in each group (winter, spring, summer, and fall) that developed IFI were 7.4%, 18.2%, 20%, and 31.2%, respectively. However, time series analysis did not show an association between seasonality of diagnosis and development of IFI (p=0.89). During the induction phase of therapy, hyperglycemia, defined as blood glucose 140-200 mg/dL for ≥ 2 days or &amp;gt;200 mg/dL for 1 day, was present in 100% of the HR patients that developed IFI and 74% of the HR patients that did not develop IFI (p=0.12). CONCLUSION In this pediatric population, patients with HR B-ALL developed more fungal infections during the early phases of therapy then those with SR disease (15.6% versus 0.8%). In analysis of potential risk factors, there were no significant differences between HR ALL groups that did or did not develop IFI. Larger-scale studies are needed in order to identify potential risk factors that will guide decisions on the routine use of primary antifungal prophylaxis in patients with HR ALL during induction therapy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. OffLabel Disclosure: Micafungin use for primary antifungal prophylaxis during induction phase of therapy.

Comparison of Antifungal Prophylaxis Drugs in Patients With Hematological Disease or Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Several antifungal drugs are available for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with hematological disease or who are undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). To summarize the evidence on the efficacy and adverse effects of antifungal agents using an integrated comparison. Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials were searched to collect all relevant evidence published in randomized clinical trials that assessed antifungal prophylaxis in patients with hematological disease. Sources were search from inception up to October 2019. Studies that compared any antifungal agent with a placebo, no antifungal agent, or another antifungal agent among patients with hematological disease or undergoing HSCT were included. Of 39 709 studies identified, 69 met the criteria for inclusion. The outcome from each study was estimated using the relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs. The Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model was used. The reliability and validity of the networks were estimated by addressing inconsistencies in the evidence from comparative studies of different treatments. Data were analyzed from December 2019 to February 2020. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Network Meta-analysis (PRISMA-NMA) guideline. The primary outcomes were invasive fungal infections (IFIs) and mortality. The secondary outcomes were fungal infections, proven IFIs, invasive candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, fungi-related death, and withdrawal owing to adverse effects of the drug. We identified 69 randomized clinical trials that reported comparisons of 12 treatments with at total of 14 789 patients. Posaconazole was the treatment associated with the best probability of success against IFIs (surface under the cumulative ranking curve, 86.7%; mean rank, 2.5). Posaconazole treatment was associated with a significant reduction in IFIs (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42-0.79) and invasive aspergillosis (RR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.85) compared with placebo. Voriconazole was associated with a significant reduction in invasive candidiasis (RR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.09-0.26) compared with placebo. However, posaconazole was associated with a higher incidence of withdrawal because of the adverse effects of the drug (surface under the cumulative ranking curve, 17.5%; mean rank, 9.2). In subgroup analyses considering efficacy and tolerance, voriconazole might be the best choice for patients undergoing HSCT, especially allogenic HSCT; however, posaconazole was ranked as the best choice for patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. These findings suggest that voriconazole may be the best prophylaxis option for patients undergoing HSCT, and posaconazole may be the best prophylaxis option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.

Pharmacist review of high-risk haematology outpatients to improve appropriateness of antifungal prophylaxis.

Background Patients with haematological malignancies are at high risk of invasive fungal infections. However, there is a lack of information about the utilisation of the recommended Australian antifungal prophylaxis guidelines in haematology outpatients. Objective To assess the impact of a weekly pharmacist review of high-risk adult haematology outpatients on the utilisation of appropriate antifungal prophylaxis. Setting Outpatient cancer centre, tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. Method A 3-month pre-and post-interventional study was conducted. A retrospective audit was conducted to obtain baseline utilisation of antifungal guidelines in adult haematology outpatients with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome receiving chemotherapy. This was followed by a weekly pharmacist review over a 3-month period of all eligible outpatients assessing the appropriateness of antifungal agent, dose, use of therapeutic drug monitoring and presence of drug-interactions/contraindications. Recommendations to physicians were conveyed weekly and outcomes recorded. Main outcome measure Appropriate utilisation of antifungal prophylaxis guidelines in outpatient haematology patients before and after implementation of a 3-month weekly pharmacist review service. Results Forty patients were included in the retrospective group, equating to 348 reviews, while 42 patients equating to 269 reviews were included in the prospective group. Appropriate utilisation of antifungal prophylaxis guidelines increased from 31 to 54% post implementation of a pharmacist review (Odds Ratio = 2.44, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.07-5.58, p = 0.0344). The most common reason for nonadherence to guidelines in both groups was lack of therapeutic drug monitoring and failure to prescribe antifungal prophylaxis where indicated. The percentage of appropriate use of antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia increased from 13 to 46% (p value < 0.01) after pharmacist intervention. The pharmacist made 153 recommendations from 269 reviews, with a percentage uptake of 40%. Moderate to severe drug interactions were identified in 19 reviews from 10 patients. One major azole antifungal-chemotherapy interaction was avoided. Conclusions Appropriate utilisation of antifungal prophylaxis guidelines can be improved through a regular pharmacist review. Future studies should identify whether improving adherence to antifungal guidelines leads to improved patient outcomes.

Itraconazole vs. posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing intensive chemotherapy: A retrospective study

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare itraconazole with posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy. MethodsAdult patients with AML received either itraconazole or posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis while undergoing intensive chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was incidence of prophylaxis failure (change in antifungal agent due to suspected invasive fungal infection [IFI], drug intolerance, drug interaction, or adverse event). ResultsFrom February 2016 to January 2018, 90 patients were included in the itraconazole group and 45 patients in the posaconazole group. Prophylaxis failure occurred in 88% of itraconazole recipients compared with 33% of posaconazole recipients (P<0.001). The primary reason for prophylaxis failure with itraconazole was suspected IFI (58%) whereas for posaconazole, failure predominantly related to drug interaction (60%). An antifungal regimen was continued upon discharge in 47% of itraconazole recipients compared with 9% of posaconazole recipients (P<0.001). The use of breakthrough IFI diagnostic tests was not significantly different in the two groups. A larger proportion of drug concentrations were collected in the posaconazole group. ConclusionsIn AML patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy, posaconazole was associated with significantly lower rates of prophylaxis failure and less need for continued antifungal therapy on discharge compared with itraconazole.

Use of micafungin as antifungal prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in Spain (GETH-MIC).

ABSTRACTIntroductionThe fungal infections remain an important problem in the allogeneic stem cell trasnsplantation (allo-SCT) setting and thus, anti-fungal prophylaxis is commonly used. The antifungal drug should offer activity, at least against Candida and Aspergillus spp., a good safety profile and low probability interactions. Micafungin could theoretically fulfill these requisites. The aim of the study was to describe the experience with micafungin as primary prophylaxis in patients undergoing allo-SCT in a cohort of Spanish centres, and to evaluate its efficacy and tolerability in this population.Material and methodsRetrospective multicentre observational study including all consecutive adult patients admitted for allo-SCT in participating centres of the Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyético (GETH), from January 2010 to December 2013, who received micafungin as primary prophylaxis during the neutropenic period.ResultsA total of 240 patients from 13 centres were identified and 159 patients were included for the analysis. Most patients (95.6%) received 50 mg/day of micafungin. During the follow-up, 7 (4.4%) patients developed breakthrough invasive fungal disease, 1 proven and 6 probable; one patient discontinued the drug because of serious drug interactions. Prophylaxis with micafungin was considered effective in 151 (94.9%) patients.ConclusionsAccording to our experience, micafungin is an appropriate alternative for antifungal prophylaxis in patients undergoing an allo-HSCT, because its efficacy, its low profile of drug interactions and side-effects.

Research progress on prevention and treatment of invasive fungal diseases in patients with hematological malignancies

The incidence of invasive fungal disease (IFD) is high in patients with hematological malignancies, including those with acute myeloid leukemia(AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome(MDS), and those receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). IFD is an important prognostic factor in patients with hematological malignancies. IFD is difficult to diagnose, and the efficacy of treatment is poor. Therefore, antifungal treatment begins with prevention. At present, there are still controversies about the clinical indications, drugs, administration time and efficacy of IFD chemoprevention. This article intends to review the research progress on the epidemiology and risk factors of IFD, as well as the clinical outcomes of antifungal agents for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with hematological malignancies. Key words: Antifungal agents; Hematologic neoplasms; Epidemiologic studies; Chemoprevention; Invasive fungal disease

Voriconazole prophylaxis in leukemic patients: A retrospective single-center study.

Invasive fungal infections commonly occur in acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukemia patients receiving chemotherapy. In these patients with acute leukemia, posaconazole prophylaxis is recommended; however, voriconazole may be a less costly alternative. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of voriconazole prophylaxis in acute leukemia patients. A retrospective chart review of inpatients at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre between 2005 and 2017 was completed. Hospitalized adult acute leukemia patients who received voriconazole prophylaxis (cases) were compared to patients who received fluconazole or no prophylaxis during chemotherapy (controls). Statistical analyses comparing baseline characteristics, safety, and efficacy outcomes between the study cohorts were completed. A posaconazole literature-based weighted mean risk was compared to the voriconazole risk of invasive fungal infection identified in this study. Of 490 acute myeloid leukemia or acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients, 83 controls and 92 cases were eligible. Case patients received an average of 24.4 ± 10.8 days of voriconazole prophylaxis. The incidence of proven or probable invasive fungal infections with voriconazole was 3.3% (3/92) versus 7.2% (6/83) in the control cohort (p > 0.05) and was comparable to the literature reported weighted incidence of invasive fungal infection with posaconazole (2.4 ± 2.1%; 95% CI 1.3%-3.4%; p > 0.05). Voriconazole was well tolerated by patients (91%; 84/91; seven discontinued due to asymptomatic elevated liver function tests). Voriconazole prophylaxis was found to be safe, effective, and comparable to literature-based efficacy data for risk of invasive fungal infection with posaconazole antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute leukemia undergoing chemotherapy and could represent a significant cost advantage.

Emerging Fungal Infections: New Patients, New Patterns, and New Pathogens.

The landscape of clinical mycology is constantly changing. New therapies for malignant and autoimmune diseases have led to new risk factors for unusual mycoses. Invasive candidiasis is increasingly caused by non-albicans Candida spp., including C. auris, a multidrug-resistant yeast with the potential for nosocomial transmission that has rapidly spread globally. The use of mould-active antifungal prophylaxis in patients with cancer or transplantation has decreased the incidence of invasive fungal disease, but shifted the balance of mould disease in these patients to those from non-fumigatus Aspergillus species, Mucorales, and Scedosporium/Lomentospora spp. The agricultural application of triazole pesticides has driven an emergence of azole-resistant A. fumigatus in environmental and clinical isolates. The widespread use of topical antifungals with corticosteroids in India has resulted in Trichophyton mentagrophytes causing recalcitrant dermatophytosis. New dimorphic fungal pathogens have emerged, including Emergomyces, which cause disseminated mycoses globally, primarily in HIV infected patients, and Blastomyces helicus and B. percursus, causes of atypical blastomycosis in western parts of North America and in Africa, respectively. In North America, regions of geographic risk for coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, and blastomycosis have expanded, possibly related to climate change. In Brazil, zoonotic sporotrichosis caused by Sporothrix brasiliensis has emerged as an important disease of felines and people.

Outcome of non-mold effective anti-fungal prophylaxis in patients at high-risk for invasive fungal infections after allogenic stem cell transplantation

Patients who develop severe graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) have a higher risk for invasive fungal infection (IFI). At our center, fluconazole prophylaxis is standard and upfront mold-effective prophylaxis performed only in patients with specific risk constellations. A total of 290 patients undergoing alloSCT between May 2002 and August 2011 were analyzed. Patients were regarded as high-risk if they suffered from acute GvHD II–IV° or extensive chronic GvHD. The 2-year incidence of an IFI after alloSCT was 8.97% (26/290) in the entire cohort and 7.78% (7/90) in the high-risk group. Mortality due to IFI was 3.85% (1/26) without including a high-risk patient. In the multivariate analysis a pre-transplant fungal infection was the only significant risk factor for developing an IFI after alloSCT (HR = 5.298; p = .001). A fluconazole prophylaxis in patients with GvHD after alloSCT is feasible in facilities with HEPA filtration and high awareness of clinical signs for IFI.

Risk of Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients with High-Risk MDS and AML Receiving Hypomethylating Agents

IntroductionAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients are at risk of invasive fungal infection (IFI) due to prolonged neutropenia related to the underlying diseases and the induction chemotherapy required to treat them. The risk of IFI specifically in AML or MDS patients treated with hypomethylating agents (HMA) has not been fully elucidated, with previous publications reporting various prophylaxis practices and IFI incidences from 3.3% to 14.4%. We sought to characterize the incidence of IFI in patients with MDS and AML who received azacitidine (AZA) or decitabine (DAC) at our institution.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the incidence of IFI in adults receiving between 10/1/10 and 10/1/17. Patients were included if they received at least two cycles of either drug and were diagnosed with AML, MDS with a revised international prognostic scoring system (R-IPSS) score of at least 3.5, or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) categorized as intermediate 2 or higher risk using CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS). Patients were excluded if they received mold-active antifungal prophylaxis at any time during HMA therapy prior to the development of an IFI, or if they received mold-active antifungal treatment when starting a HMA. The primary endpoint was the incidence of IFI, defined as proven, probable, or possible using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group criteria (EORTC).ResultsSix hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients were screened, and 203 patients met inclusion criteria. The three most common reasons for exclusion were incomplete data (n=158), receipt of fewer than two cycles of a HMA (n=138), and receipt of mold-active antifungal treatment at the time of HMA initiation or mold-active antifungal prophylaxis at any point during HMA therapy (n=86). Six patients had two distinct episodes of HMA therapy separated by either an allogeneic stem cell transplant or a treatment other than HMA; thus 209 episodes of treatment occurred amongst 203 patients. Overall, the study population was elderly with the median age of 69, and 59% of the patients were male. Fifty-one percent of patients had AML, while 49% had MDS or CMML; 72% received AZA. The median number of cycles of HMA utilized was five. Most patients were treatment-naïve (59% AML and 87% MDS had no prior therapy). A significant portion of the group (25.8%) was neutropenic on cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1) of HMA. Other pertinent baseline characteristics of the study population are displayed in Table 1. We identified 20 cases of IFI, with an overall incidence of 9.6%. Most IFI were possible cases according to the EORTC criteria (13/20, 65%), but there were 3 culture-proven cases. The possible cases all met the host criterion of neutropenia and 12 of 13 met the clinical criterion of lower respiratory tract infection based on imaging. Organisms isolated on culture included Aspergillus spp., Fusarium spp., and Scedosporium spp. A diagnosis of IFI was made at a median of 3 cycles of HMA, with the majority (85%) diagnosed within the first four cycles. Among the 20 cases of IFI, 12 were diagnosed while receiving AZA and 8 were receiving DAC. More than half of the patients who developed IFI were neutropenic on C1D1. These patients had a significantly higher risk of IFI compared to non-neutropenic patients (20.4% vs. 5.8%, p=0.0051). When other baseline characteristics were analyzed, patients with therapy-related MDS (t-MDS) compared to de novo MDS were more likely to have an IFI (20.8% vs. 5.1%, p=0.0314). Patients with de novo AML also had a higher incidence of IFI compared to AML from an antecedent MDS/MPN (15.4% vs. 2.4%), however this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.07). Additional comparisons are described in Table 2.ConclusionIFI occurred in 9.6% of patients treated with HMA, but was observed in 20.4% of those who were neutropenic on C1D1 of HMA. Another potential risk factor identified was t-MDS versus de novo MDS. Prospective evaluation of mold-active antifungal prophylaxis in patients with MDS or AML who are neutropenic at the start of HMA therapy is warranted. DisclosuresFrey:Novartis: Consultancy; Servier Consultancy: Consultancy. Perl:Arog: Consultancy; NewLink Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Porter:Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Genentech: Other: Spouse employment.