anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Research Articles

Impact of pre-infusion disease burden on outcomes in pediatric relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia following anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have demonstrated high efficacy in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Despite this success, the challenge of post-infusion relapse persists. In our study, we evaluate 116 children with R/R B-ALL who received anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy at our center. All patients were included in the response analysis and assessed for survival and toxicity. The CR rate was 98.3%, with 90.5% achieving minimal residual disease negative (MRD)- CR by day 28 (d28). The overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 69.3%±4.5% and 59.0%±4.6%, respectively, with a median follow-up duration of 47.9 months. The patients with pre-infusion MRD ≥ 1% was associated with lower 4-year OS (p = 0.006) and EFS (p = 0.027) comparing to those with MRD < 1%. The incidences of grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity were21.6 and 5.0%, respectively. Therefore, pre-infusion disease burden is a predictor of long-term outcome following anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for pediatric R/R B-ALL.

Successful generation of fully human, second generation, anti-CD19 CAR T cells for clinical use in patients with diverse autoimmune disorders

BackgroundB-cell targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, which lead to profound B-cell depletion, have been well-established in hematology-oncology. This deep B-cell depletion mechanism has prompted the exploration of their use in B-cell driven autoimmune diseases. We herein report on the manufacturing of KYV-101, a fully human anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, derived from patients who were treated across a spectrum of autoimmune diseases. MethodsKYV-101 was manufactured from peripheral blood-derived mononuclear cells of 20 patients across 7 autoimmune disease types (neurological autoimmune diseases, n=13; rheumatological diseases, n=7). Patients ranged from 18–75 years of age. Duration of disease ranged from <1–23 years since diagnosis. Patients were heavily pretreated, and most were refractory to prior immunosuppressive treatments. Apheresis was collected across 9 sites, cryopreserved, and shipped to the manufacturing facility. Healthy donor apheresis samples were collected for manufacturing comparison. Manufacturing was performed using the CliniMACS Prodigy system. Cells were enriched for CD4+/CD8+ T cells, transduced with a 3rd generation lentiviral vector encoding the CAR, expanded in vitro, and harvested. Percent cell viability, T-cell purity, cellular expansion, and transduction efficiency were assessed. Activity was assessed using cytokine release assays for KYV-101 CAR T cells co-cultured with different CD19+/– target cell lines. ResultsKYV-101 was successfully manufactured for 100% of patients. Transduced cell populations were highly viable, with expansion ranging from 11–66 fold at Day 8, and were comparable across disease types. Healthy donor-derived controls displayed similar expansion ranges. High CAR expression and transduction rates were observed, ranging between 37–84% with low variation in transgene copy number (2 to 4 per cell). Cell viability of the final KYV-101 drug product ranged from 87–97%. KYV-101 displayed robust CD19-dependent and effector dose-related release of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IFN-γ. ConclusionsKYV-101 manufacturing yielded a CAR T-cell product with high viability and consistent composition and functionality, regardless of disease indication, pre-treatment, and heterogeneity of the incoming material. Cryopreservation of the apheresis and final drug product enabled widespread distribution. These results support the robustness of the manufacturing process for the fully human KYV-101 anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy drug product for patients across diverse autoimmune disease types.

The future of immunotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

With the introduction of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR T) therapies, bispecific CD3/CD20 antibodies and anti-CD19 antibodies, immunotherapy continues to transform the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A number of novel immunotherapeutic strategies are under investigation to build upon current clinical benefit and offer further options to those patients who cannot tolerate conventional intensive therapies due to their age and/or state of health. Alongside immunotherapies that leverage the adaptive immune response, natural killer (NK) cell and myeloid cell-engaging therapies can utilize the innate immune system. Monoclonal antibodies engineered for greater recognition by the patient's immune system can enhance antitumor cytotoxic mechanisms mediated by NK cells and macrophages. In addition, CAR technology is extending into NK cells and macrophages and investigational immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting macrophage/myeloid cell checkpoints via the CD47/SIRPα axis are in development. Regimens that engage both innate and adaptive immune responses may help to overcome resistance to current immunotherapies. Furthermore, combinations of immunotherapy and oncogenic pathway inhibitors to reprogram the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of DLBCL may also potentiate antitumor responses. As immunotherapy treatment options continue to expand, both in the first-line setting and further lines of therapy, understanding how to harness these immunotherapies and the potential for combination approaches will be important for the development of future DLBCL treatment approaches.

The Current Landscape of Secondary Malignancies after CAR T-Cell Therapies: How Could Malignancies Be Prevented?

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have revolutionised the field of haematological malignancies by achieving impressive remission rates in patients with highly refractory haematological malignancies, improving overall survival. To date, six commercial anti-CD19 and anti-BCMA CAR T-cell products have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell haematological malignancies and multiple myeloma. The indications for CAR T-cell therapies are gradually expanding, with these therapies being investigated in a variety of diseases, including non-malignant ones. Despite the great success, there are several challenges surrounding CAR T-cell therapies, such as non-durable responses and high-grade toxicities. In addition, a new safety concern was added by the FDA on 28 November 2023 following reports of T-cell malignancies in patients previously treated with either anti-CD19 or anti-BCMA autologous CAR T-cell therapies both in clinical trials and in the real-world setting. Since then, several reports have been published presenting the incidence and analysing the risks of other secondary malignancies after CAR T-cell therapies. In this opinion article, the current landscape of secondary malignancies after CAR T-cell therapies is presented, along with a proposed strategy for future research aiming at potentially diminishing or abrogating the risk of developing secondary malignancies after CAR T-cell therapies.

Xuebijing enhances antitumor efficacy of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells

ObjectiveTo investigate the effects and mechanisms of Xuebijing injection (XBJ) on Chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell function and its therapeutic potential against CAR-T therapy-associated cytokine storms (CRS). MethodsAnti-CD19 CAR-T cells were established based on FMC63 antibodies. Different doses of XBJ (1 and 10 mg/mL) were added to the culture system. Untreated anti-CD19 CAR-T cells served as negative controls. After 48-h co-culture, the effects of XBJ on CAR-T cell function were assessed. Carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester staining was used to assess the effect of XBJ on CAR-T cell proliferation. Flow cytometry, luciferase reporter gene assays, and real time cellular analysis were employed to evaluate the effects of XBJ on CAR-T cell cytotoxicity in vitro. RNA-sequencing was performed to analyze the effects of XBJ on CAR-T cell gene expression. Network pharmacology predicted potential XBJ therapeutic targets for CRS, which were verified in a THP-1 macrophage inflammation model. ResultsXBJ enhanced both the proliferation and tumor killing capacities of CAR-T cells. Transcriptome analysis showed that XBJ treatment affects multiple genes and pathways in CAR-T cells, with differential gene enrichment in multiple cell proliferation and growth factor pathways. Potential targets for CRS control by XBJ were predicted using network pharmacology, and the inhibitory effect of XBJ on the expression of relevant genes was verified using a macrophage model. ConclusionThe results of this study indicate that XBJ can enhance the killing effect of CAR-T cells on tumor cells and that the mechanism is related to the regulation of T cell proliferation and activation. Moreover, XBJ inhibited excessive inflammation associated with CAR-T therapy. However, the current findings remain to be further validated through in vivo experiments.

Tocilizumab Prophylaxis Following Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Most patients treated with axi-cel experience cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and/or adverse neurologic events (NEs). To explore potential approaches for reducing CAR T-cell-related toxicities with axi-cel, several safety expansion cohorts were added to the pivotal ZUMA-1 trial. ZUMA-1 Cohort 3 was an exploratory safety cohort that investigated the use of the IL-6 receptor-blocking antibody tocilizumab and anticonvulsant levetiracetam as prophylaxis against CRS and NEs in patients treated with axi-cel. Patients with R/R LBCL were enrolled in Cohort 3 and received conditioning chemotherapy on d -5 through -3 followed by a single infusion of axi-cel (2 × 106 cells/kg) on d 0. Prophylactic tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) was administered 48 h after axi-cel infusion. Primary endpoints were incidence and severity of CRS and NEs. Key secondary endpoints included the incidence of adverse events, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and biomarker analyses (eg, circulating CAR T cells, cytokines, chemokines). Forty-two patients were enrolled in Cohort 3, 38 of whom received axi-cel. In the 24-month analysis, any-grade CRS and NEs occurred in 92% and 87% of patients, and Grade ≥3 CRS and NEs occurred in 3% and 42% of patients, respectively. One Grade 5 NE (cerebral edema) occurred. With 24-mo minimum follow-up, the ORR was 63%, and 39.5% of patients had ongoing response. With 48-month follow-up, median OS was 34.8 mo (95% CI, 5.4-not estimable). CAR T-cell expansion in ZUMA-1 Cohort 3 was comparable with pivotal Cohorts 1 and 2. Consistent with tocilizumab-mediated inhibition of IL-6R, serum IL-6 levels were increased relative to Cohorts 1 and 2. Grade ≥3 NEs were associated with elevated IL-6 levels, proinflammatory cytokines, and myeloid cells in the cerebrospinal fluid. Based on these findings, prophylactic tocilizumab is not recommended to prevent CAR T-cell-related adverse events, and beneficial effects of prophylactic levetiracetam remain uncertain in patients with R/R LBCL.

Smoldering oncolysis by foamy virus carrying CD19 as a CAR target escapes CAR T detection by genomic modification

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) Tcells have had limited success against solid tumors. Here, we used an oncolytic foamy virus (oFV) to display a model CAR target antigen (CD19) on tumors in combination with anti-CD19 CAR Tcells. We generated oFV-Δbel2 and oFV-bel2 vectors to test the efficiency and stability of viral/CD19 spread. While both viruses conferred equal CAR T killing invitro, the oFV-Δbel2 virus acquired G-to-A mutations, whereas oFV-bel2 virus had genome deletions. In subcutaneous tumor models invivo, CAR Tcells led to a significant decrease in oFV-specific bioluminescence, confirming clearance of oFV-infected tumor cells. However, the most effective therapy was with high-dose oFV in the absence of CAR Tcells, indicating that CAR T clearance of oFV was detrimental. Moreover, in tumors that escaped CAR Tcell treatment, resurgent virus contained deletions within the oFV-CD19 transgene, allowing the virus to escape CAR T elimination. Therefore, oFV represents a slow smoldering type of oncolytic virus, whose chronic spread through tumors generates anti-tumor therapy, which is abolished by CAR T therapy. These results suggest that further development of this oncolytic platform, with additional immunotherapeutic arming, may allow for an effective combination of chronic oncolysis.

Outcomes of patients with R/R B-cell NHL and limited (

AbstractUnirradiated patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who undergo anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) have a predominant localized pattern of relapse, the significance of which is heightened in individuals with limited/localized disease before CART. This study reports on the outcomes of patients with R/R NHL and limited (<5 involved sites) disease bridged with or without radiotherapy. A multicenter retrospective review of 150 patients with R/R NHL who received CART with <5 disease sites before leukapheresis was performed. Bridging treatment, if any, was administered between leukapheresis and CART infusion. Study end points included relapse-free survival (RFS), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival. Before CART infusion, 48 patients (32%) received bridging radiotherapy (BRT), and 102 (68%) did not. The median follow-up was 21 months. After CART infusion, BRT patients had higher objective response (92% vs 78%; P = .046) and sustained complete response rates (54% vs 33%; P = .015). Local relapse in sites present before CART was lower in the BRT group (21% vs 46%; P = .003). BRT patients had improved 2-year RFS (53% vs 44%; P = .023) and 2-year EFS (37% vs 34%; P = .039) compared with patients who did not receive BRT. The impact of BRT was most prominent in patients who had ≤2 pre-CART involved disease sites, with 2-year RFS of 62% in patients who received BRT compared with 42% in those who did not (P = .002). BRT before CART for patients with limited (<5 involved disease sites) R/R NHL improves response rate, local control, RFS, and EFS without causing significant toxicities.

Clonal evolution from B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia with BCR::ABL1 multilineage involvement to acute myeloid leukemia after multiple anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

Not available.

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has less efficacy in Richter transformation than in de novo large B-cell lymphoma and transformed low-grade B-cell lymphoma.

The activity of anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with Richter's transformation (RT) to aggressive large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) is largely unknown. In a multicenter retrospective study, we report the safety and efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in patients with RT (n=30) compared to patients with aggressive B cell lymphoma (n=283) and patients with transformed indolent Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma (iNHL) (n=141) between April 2016 and January 2023. Two-thirds of patients received prior therapy for CLL before RT and 89% of them received B-cell receptor and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. Toxicities of CAR T cell therapy in RT were similar to other lymphomas, with no fatalities related to cytokine release syndrome or immune effector-cell associated neurotoxicity synderome. The 100-day overall response rate and complete response rates in patients with RT were 57% and 47%, respectively. With a median follow up of 19 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months in patients with RT compared to 18 months in de-novo LBCL and not reached in patients with transformed iNHL. The OS at 12 months was 45% in patients with RT compared with 62% and 75% in patients with de novo LBCL and transformed iNHL, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, worse OS was associated with RT histology, elevated LDH, and more prior lines of therapy. CAR T cell therapy can salvage a proportion of patients with CLL and RT exposed to prior targeted agents; however, efficacy in RT is inferior compared to de novo LBCL and transformed iNHL.

T-cell malignancies with anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

T-cell malignancies with anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in older patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma: A multicenter study.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, despite being a potentially curative therapy in relapsed or refractory (RR) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), remains underutilized in older patients due to limited clinical data. We therefore studied the safety and efficacy of CAR-T therapy in older patients with RR LBCL in the real-world setting. Patients aged ≥65 years with RR LBCL, treated with anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy at 7 US institutions were included in this multicenter, retrospective, observational study. In total, 226 patients were included. Median age at infusion was 71 years (range 65-89). Best objective and complete response rates were 86% and 62%, respectively. Median follow-up after infusion was 18.3 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months, with 6- and 12-month PFS estimates of 54% and 44%, respectively. The nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate was 10.9% at day 180, primarily due to infections, and not impacted by the age groups. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 7% and 26%, respectively. In univariate analysis, no significant difference in PFS was seen regardless of the age groups or CAR-T type, whereas ECOG PS ≥2, elevated LDH, bulky disease, advanced stage, extranodal involvement, the need for bridging therapy, and prior bendamustine exposure were associated with shorter PFS. These findings support the use of CAR-T in older patients, including those aged ≥80 years. The age at CAR-T therapy did not influence safety, survival, and NRM outcomes. Older patients should not be excluded from receiving CAR-T therapy solely based on their chronological age.

A pilot study of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) for relapsed/refractory primary and secondary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL and SCNSL).

2006 Background: Prognosis of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CNSL is poor with no standard of care treatment options. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) has shown efficacy in R/R systemic large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) and could be considered for R/R CNSL. Methods: We conducted a pilot study of axi-cel in patients with R/R CNS LBCL. No bridging therapy except corticosteroids was allowed after enrollment. Ommaya reservoir was placed before infusion. Patients underwent lymphodepletion with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide followed by axi-cel dosing of 2x106 cells/kg intravenous infusion. The study enrolled 18 patients, of whom the first 6 patients were observed for treatment-limiting toxicities (TLTs). Primary endpoint was safety, measured by rate of TLTs and grade 3+ adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Exploratory analyses include paired peripheral blood (PB) and CSF analyses for axi-cel pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, flow cytometry, single-cell RNA-Seq. Results: We report the results of the entire cohort of 18 patients (13 PCNSL, 4 SCNSL, 1 concurrent systemic &amp; ocular L) enrolled. Median age was 62 years (33-80), 8/18 were women. Median number of prior therapies was 3 (1-7). No TLTs were observed; 16/18 (89%) patients developed cytokine release syndrome/CRS (grade 3+, 0%); 8/18 (44%) developed immune effector cell-associated neurologic syndrome/ICANS, 5/18 (28%) grade 3+. Two patients developed Ommaya-related meningitis requiring explant with recovery. One patient had grade 3 seizures that resolved with anti-epileptic agents. The ORR was 94% (17/18); 67% CR (12/18). The median time to best response was 3 months. As of January 25, 2024, the median follow up was 24.2 months, median DOR 13.4 months and 9 patients had progressed. The median PFS was 14.3 months (95% CI: 6.3-NR) and median OS, 26.4 months (95% CI: 11.2-NR). Seven patients have died, all from disease progression. At the time of presentation, there will be a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Correlative data on all 18 patients will be presented at the meeting. Axi-cel pharmacokinetics in the first 12 CNSL patients was similar to that previously reported for DLBCL patients without CNS involvement in ZUMA-1 and ZUMA-7. Patients with CR demonstrated increased peak levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. CSF CAR T cells exhibit Type I interferon (IFN) transcriptomic signature compared to proliferative signature in blood. Conclusions: Axi-cel was safe and well-tolerated in CNSL patients with encouraging efficacy and median PFS and durability of response of more than 1 year. There was no apparent additional risk of adverse neurologic events including ICANS from axi-cel. Clinical trial information: NCT04608487 .

Long-term survival outcomes of patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL) treated with brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) in ZUMA-3.

6531 Background: Brexu-cel is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for pts ≥18 y with R/R B-ALL in the US (≥26 y in the EU). In the 3-y follow-up of ZUMA-3, median overall survival (OS) was 25.6 mo (N=78). Survival benefit was seen regardless of age, prior treatment, or subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplant (sub alloSCT) status (Shah et al. ASCO 2023. #7023). Here we report 4-y survival outcomes for ZUMA-3. Methods: Eligible pts (≥18 y) had R/R B-ALL and received brexu-cel (1×106 CAR T cells/kg) after leukapheresis and lymphodepleting chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate per independent review with OS as a key secondary endpoint. Descriptive statistics are reported for post hoc exploratory subgroup analyses. Results: As of July 23, 2023, median follow-up time in Phase 1 and 2 pts who received the pivotal dose of brexu-cel (N=78) was 53.6 mo (range 44.7-82.3). Median OS (95% CI) was 25.6 mo (16.2-60.4) in all treated pts and 47.0 mo (23.2-not estimable [NE]) in pts with CR/CRi (n=57). In pts &lt;26 y (n=15), median OS (95% CI) was 23.2 mo (9.0-NE) and was 26.0 mo (15.9-NE) in pts ≥26 y (n=63). Median OS (95% CI) in pts with 1 prior therapy (n=15) was 60.4 mo (7.6-NE) and was 25.4 mo (15.9-47.0) in pts with ≥2 prior therapies (n=63). Medians for OS (95% CI) in pts with (n=38) and without (n=40) prior blinatumomab (blina) were 15.9 (8.3-26.0) and 60.4 mo (18.6-NE), respectively. Median OS (95% CI) was 36.3 mo (10.2-NE) in responders who went on to sub alloSCT (n=14) and 60.4 mo (23.2-NE) in those who did not (n=43). The 48-mo OS rate was 40% (95% CI, 28-52) in all pts but appeared lower in pts with prior blina (24%; Table). No new adverse events or deaths occurred since the prior analysis. Grade ≥3 infection rates since the start of study appeared higher in pts &lt;26 y and in pts with prior blina (Table). Rates of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse-related mortality (95% CI) at 48 mo were 25% (15-37) and 34% (24-45; N=78), respectively. Of note, 6/17 NRM events (35%) occurred in pts with sub alloSCT. Conclusions: After &gt;4 y follow-up, pts in ZUMA-3 continued to experience OS benefit regardless of age, prior therapy, or sub alloSCT status, though pts with prior blina had a numerically lower 48-mo OS rate. Small subgroups and unbalanced pt characteristics limit interpretation of these results. No new safety signals were observed. Further studies are needed to fully assess the impact of age, prior therapies, and sub alloSCT on outcomes after brexu-cel. Clinical trial information: NCT02614066 . [Table: see text]

Research Progress of CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy in B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma--Review

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is a rapidly developing new immunotherapy in recent years. Compared with other therapies, CAR-T has significant advantages for high-risk and relapsed/refractory B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL) patients. Currently, a variety of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of B-NHL, such as axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecucel, lisocababtagene maraleucel and brexucabtagene autoleucel. In addition, many studies are actively exploring and developing different targeted CAR-T cells, which show great potential in B-NHL. This review briefly summarized the latest research progress on the application of CAR-T in common B-NHL.

Preclinical specificity & activity of a fully human 41BB-expressing anti-CD19 CART- therapy for treatment-resistant autoimmune disease

Over 4% of the global population is estimated to live with autoimmune disease, necessitating immunosuppressive treatment that is often chronic, not curative, and carries associated risks. B cells have emerged as key players in disease pathogenesis, as evidenced by partial responsiveness to B cell depletion by antibody-based therapies. However, these treatments often have transient effects due to incomplete depletion of tissue-resident B cells. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) Tcells targeting B cells have demonstrated efficacy in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus. To this end, we developed an anti-CD19 CAR Tcell product candidate, CABA-201, containing a clinically evaluated fully human CD19 binder (IC78) with a 4-1BB costimulatory domain and CD3 zeta stimulation domain for treatment refractory autoimmune disease. Here, we demonstrate specific cytotoxic activity of CABA-201 against CD19+ Nalm6 cells with no off-target effects on primary human cells. Novel examination of CABA-201 generated from primary Tcells from multiple patients with autoimmune disease displayed robust CAR surface expression and effective elimination of the intended target autologous CD19+ B cells invitro. Together, these findings support the tolerability and activity of CABA-201 for clinical development in patients with autoimmune disease.

Economic evaluation of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell pathway for large B-cell lymphomas in the real-life setting: the experience of an Italian hub center in the first three years of activity

Poor literature report actual and detailed costs of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell pathway in a real-life setting. We retrospectively collect data for all patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive large B-cell lymphoma who underwent leukapheresis between August 2019 and August 2022. All costs and medical resource consumption accountability were calculated on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis, starting from leukapheresis to the time when the patient (infused or not) exited the CAR T-cell pathway for any reason. Eighty patients were addressed to leukapheresis and 59 were finally infused. After excluding CAR-T product cost, the main driver of higher costs were hospitalizations followed by the examinations/procedures and other drugs, respectively 43.9%, 26.3% and 25.4% of the total. Regarding costs of drugs and medications other than CAR T products, the most expensive items are those referred to AEs, both infective and extra-infective within 30 days from infusion, that account for 63% of the total. Density plot of cost analyses did not show any statistically significant difference with respect to the years of leukapheresis or infusion. To achieve finally 59/80 infused patients the per capita patients without CAR-T products results 74,000 euros. This analysis covers a growing concern on health systems, the burden of expenses related to CAR T-cell therapy, which appears to provide significant clinical benefit despite its high cost, thus making economic evaluations highly relevant. The relevance of this study should be also viewed in light of continuously evolving indications for this therapy.

Real-world and clinical trial outcomes in large B-cell lymphoma with axicabtagene ciloleucel across race and ethnicity

AbstractAxicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Despite extensive data supporting its use, outcomes stratified by race and ethnicity groups are limited. Here, we report clinical outcomes with axi-cel in patients with R/R LBCL by race and ethnicity in both real-world and clinical trial settings. In the real-world setting, 1290 patients who received axi-cel between 2017 and 2020 were identified from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database; 106 and 169 patients were included from the ZUMA-1 and ZUMA-7 trials, respectively. Overall survival was consistent across race/ethnicity groups. However, non-Hispanic (NH) Black patients had lower overall response rate (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.63) and lower complete response rate (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.97) than NH White patients. NH Black patients also had a shorter progression-free survival vs NH White (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.04-1.90) and NH Asian patients (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.08-2.59). NH Asian patients had a longer duration of response than NH White (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33-0.94) and Hispanic patients (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.97). There was no difference in cytokine release syndrome by race/ethnicity; however, higher rates of any-grade immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome were observed in NH White patients than in other patients. These results provide important context when treating patients with R/R LBCL with CAR T-cell therapy across different racial and ethnic groups. ZUMA-1 and ZUMA-7 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: #NCT02348216 and #NCT03391466, respectively) are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Disrupting B and T-cell collaboration in autoimmune disease: T-cell engagers versus CAR T-cell therapy?

B and T cells collaborate to drive autoimmune disease (AID). Historically, B- and T-cell (B-T cell) co-interaction was targeted through different pathways such as alemtuzumab, abatacept, and dapirolizumab with variable impact on B-cell depletion (BCD), whereas the majority of patients with AID including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, and organ transplantation benefit from targeted BCD with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab, ocrelizumab, or ofatumumab. Refractory AID is a significant problem for patients with incomplete BCD with a greater frequency of IgD-CD27+ switched memory B cells, CD19+CD20- B cells, and plasma cells that are not directly targeted by anti-CD20 antibodies, whereas most lymphoid tissue plasma cells express CD19. Furthermore, B-T-cell collaboration is predominant in lymphoid tissues and at sites of inflammation such as the joint and kidney, where BCD may be inefficient, due to limited access to key effector cells. In the treatment of cancer, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and T-cell engagers (TCE) that recruit T cells to induce B-cell cytotoxicity have delivered promising results for anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapies, the CD19 TCE blinatumomab and CD20 TCE such as mosunetuzumab, glofitamab, or epcoritamab. Limited evidence suggests that anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy may be effective in managing refractory AID whereas we await evaluation of TCE for use in non-oncological indications. Therefore, here, we discuss the potential mechanistic advantages of novel therapies that rely on T cells as effector cells to disrupt B-T-cell collaboration toward overcoming rituximab-resistant AID.

Associations of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with toxicities and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Few studies have reported the associations of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxic events (NEs) and efficacy after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We present a retrospective study of 67 patients with R/R B-ALL who received anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, 41 (61.2%) patients received G-CSF (G-CSF group), while 26 (38.8%) did not (non-G-CSF group). Patients had similar duration of grade 3–4 neutropenia between the two groups. The incidences of CRS and NEs were higher in G-CSF group, while no differences in severity were found. Further stratified analysis showed that the incidence and severity of CRS were not associated with G-CSF administration in patients with low bone marrow (BM) tumor burden. None of the patients with low BM tumor burden developed NEs. However, there was a significant increase in the incidence of CRS after G-CSF administration in patients with high BM tumor burden. The duration of CRS in patients who used G-CSF was longer. There were no significant differences in response rates at 1 and 3 months after CAR T-cell infusion, as well as overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In conclusion, our results showed that G-CSF administration was not associated with the incidence or severity of CRS in patients with low BM tumor burden, but the incidence of CRS was higher after G-CSF administration in patients with high BM tumor burden. The duration of CRS was prolonged in G-CSF group. G-CSF administration was not associated with the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy.