anti-CCR5 mAb Research Articles

2501. CCR5 Targeted ARV Loaded Nanoparticle: Dual Protection for HIV Functional Cure

BackgroundOne of the NIH high-priority HIV/AIDS research objectives is to discover novel therapeutics aimed at developing safe, tolerable, strategies that targets cellular protein to induce long-term antiviral suppression. This current research aims at designing a novel targeted nano-formulation combining cell targeting and antiretroviral therapy to provide double protection against HIV-1.MethodsCCR5 targeted combination antiretroviral drugs (cARV) loaded nanoparticles (NPs) were synthesized based on water-in-oil-in-water (W-O-W) emulsion methodology. For targeting CCR5+ T cells, a modified high affinity CCR5 monoclonal Ab (XFCCR5 mAb), was isolated from XF-CCR5 hybridoma cells. The XFCCR5 mAbs were covalently conjugated through their C-terminus by replacing the NHS group on FTC+DTG NPs with covalent amide bond. The CCR5 mAb binding was evaluated by SDS–PAGE methods. The CCR5-specific binding affinity of XFCCR5-FTC+DTG NP in compared with XFCCR5 monoclonal antibody (mAb) was evaluated by flow cytometry using CD4+CCR5+ TZM-bl cell line and PBMCs. The intracellular pharmacokinetic (PK) profile in TZMbl cells was evaluated by LC-MS/MS analysis, whereas in vitro efficacy was evaluated based on Steady-Glo® Luciferase Assay System using TZM-bl cells.ResultsXFCCR5-FTC+DTG NPs obtained averaged 173 ± 23 nm (mean ± SEM, n = 3) with 2.2 ± 0.47 mg XFCCR5 mAb bound per mg cARV NP. The formulation % entrapment efficiency of DTG and FTC respectively, to be 55 ± 1.6% and 42.6 ± 5.6%. The specific binding affinity (Km) of XFCCR5-FTC+DTG NP and XFCCR5 mAb were estimated to be 0.0057 and 0.0377, higher compared with wild-type anti-CCR5 mAb with higher Km value 0.303. Finally, the 4-day HIV-infection protection study result illustrates IC50 in case of XFCCR5-FTC+DTG NP and XFCCR5 NP to be as low as 0.0069 and 0.0031 µg/mL, respectively, compared with 1.771 µg/mL for XFCCR5 mAb (Figure 1, TZM-bl and Figure 2, PBMCs).ConclusionThis nano-formulation aimed at duel protection by preventing HIV binding to CCR5+CD4+T cell due to CCR5 receptor blocking. These result support protection against HIV and maintenance of cARV drug levels. This novel formulation could be supportive of immune-alternative to achieve functional-cure against HIV. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

CD4-BFFI: A novel, bifunctional HIV-1 entry inhibitor with high and broad antiviral potency

Resistance to antiretroviral drugs is a common problem in the treatment of HIV-1-infected patients. To overcome resistance, we generated a novel, bifunctional HIV-1 entry inhibitor by combining the anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) 6314 with a fusion inhibitor similar to T-651 (anti- CD4 mAb based Bi Functional Fusion Inhibitor, CD4-BFFI). CD4-BFFI has potent antiviral activity against a multitude of HIV-1 isolates independent of their co-receptor usage and genetic background. It has higher antiviral potency compared to the fusion inhibitor T-651 or the anti-CD4 mAb 6314 used independently. More importantly, every HIV-1 strain tested was fully inhibited by CD4-BFFI while many strains were only partially inhibited by 6314. CD4-BFFI also retained antiviral potency against virus strains resistant to two fusion inhibitors, a CCR5 antagonist and an anti-CCR5 mAb. Pre-incubation of cells with a saturating concentration of anti-CD4 mAbs reduced the antiviral potency of CD4-BFFI, suggesting that binding of CD4-BFFI to the cell surface via its CD4 mAb portion is required for the antiviral potency of its fusion inhibitor moiety. Collectively, we present a novel HIV-1 inhibitor with a dual mode of action and excellent antiviral potency against wildtype and entry-inhibitor resistant virus strains suggesting that CD4-BFFI may have a high barrier to resistance.

Suppression of Acute and Chronic Cardiac Allograft Rejection in Mice by Inhibition of Chemokine Receptor 5 in Combination with Cyclosporine A

Inhibition of chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5), a chemokine receptor expressed on activated T cells, is an effective antiviral therapy in patients with HIV infection, but its efficacy in modulating inflammation and immunity is only just beginning to be investigated. In this study we examined the inhibition of CCR5 in combination with the treatment with cyclosporine A in acute and chronic rejection in cardiac transplantation. Eighty fully MHC-mismatched murine cardiac allograft models were randomized to four groups. Recipients in group A were treated with anti-CCR5 mAb and CsA, mice in group B were given anti-CCR5 mAb alone, animals in group C were administered only CsA, and group D were the control group with PBS. Acute and chronic rejection was investigated on day 7 and day 45 post-transplant, respectively. Allografts treated with anti-CCR5 mAb plus CsA showed significantly prolonged survival (44.73 +/- 0.258 d, P < 0.01) compared with PBS-treated group (11.067 +/- 0.707 d). Treatment with anti-CCR5 mAb plus CsA significantly inhibited the progression of CAV. Our findings demonstrated that anti-CCR5 mAb in combination with CsA can prolong the survival of allograft and alleviate both acute and chronic allograft rejection. Thus, combined administration of anti-CCR5 mAb and CsA may become a new therapeutic approach for the prevention of cardiac graft failure that has not been obviated by conventional immunosuppressive agents.

RETRACTED: Chronic cardiac allograft rejection in mice is alleviated by inhibition of CCR5 in combination with cyclosporine A.

The chemokine receptor CCR5 plays important roles in acute allograft rejection. In this study, we examined the inhibition of CCR5 in combination with the treatment with cyclosporine A (CsA) in chronic rejection in cardiac transplantation. Forty-five transplant recipients were randomized to three groups. Recipients in group A were treated with anti-CCR5 mAb and CsA, mice in group B were given anti-CCR5 mAb alone, and animals in group C were administered with only CsA. On day 45 after transplantation, the allografts were harvested and examined by immunohistologic technique and PT-PCR methods. Allografts treated with anti-CCR5 mAb and CsA showed significantly prolonged survival (44.73 ± 0.258 days, P < 0.01) as compared with CsA-treated group (37.00 ± 2.04 days). Treatment with anti-CCR5 mAb plus CsA significantly inhibited the progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Our findings demonstrated that anti-CCR5 mAb in combination with CsA can prolong the survival of allograft through their cardio-protective and immunomodulative properties. Thus, combined administration of anti-CCR5 mAb and CsA may become a new therapeutic approach for the prevention of cardiac graft failure that has not been obviated by conventional immunosuppressive agents.

Cell surface CCR5 density determines the intensity of T cell migration towards rheumatoid arthritis synoviocytes

As we have recently shown that the number of CCR5 molecules at the cell surface determines the efficiency of its function as a chemokine receptor, we tested the hypothesis that cell surface CCR5 density could influence the intensity of T lymphocyte recruitment into the rheumatoid joint. For this purpose, we established two Jurkat cell line-derived clones that differed only by their cell surface CCR5 densities. We studied their chemotaxis towards TNF-α-transduced rheumatoid synoviocytes supernatant. The Jurkat cell subline that expressed the higher cell surface CCR5 density migrated more intensively towards the supernatant of TNF-α-transduced synoviocytes than the Jurkat cell subline that expressed a lower surface CCR5 density. Moreover, this migration was blocked by an anti-CCR5 mAb. The CCR5 density on T cell surface, which is constant over time for a given individual, but varies drastically from one individual to another, might thus be a factor determining the intensity of joint inflammation in the course of RA.

The Chemokine SDF-1/CXCL12 Binds to and Signals through the Orphan Receptor RDC1 in T Lymphocytes

Combined phylogenetic and chromosomal location studies suggest that the orphan receptor RDC1 is related to CXC chemokine receptors. RDC1 provides a co-receptor function for a restricted number of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) isolates, in particular for the CXCR4-using HIV-2 ROD strain. Here we show that CXCL12, the only known natural ligand for CXCR4, binds to and signals through RDC1. We demonstrate that RDC1 is expressed in T lymphocytes and that CXCL12-promoted chemotaxis is inhibited by an anti-RDC1 monoclonal antibody. Concomitant blockade of RDC1 and CXCR4 produced additive inhibitory effects in CXCL12-induced T cell migration. Furthermore, we provide evidence that interaction of CXCL12 with RDC1 is specific, saturable, and of high affinity (apparent KD approximately 0.4 nM). In CXCR4-negative cells expressing RDC1, CXCL12 promotes internalization of the receptor and chemotactic signals through RDC1. Collectively, our data indicate that RDC1, which we propose to rename as CXCR7, is a receptor for CXCL12.

Establishment of an HIV cell–cell fusion assay by using two genetically modified HeLa cell lines and reporter gene

Infection of human cells with the human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1) can be mimicked by a fusion process between cells expressing the HIV envelope protein (Env) and cells expressing both human CD4 together with the appropriate human chemokine receptors. In this study, a T-tropic HIV cell–cell fusion assay was established that utilized CD4, human CXCR4 and HIV NL4-3 gp160 as fusion components and a T7 polymerase-activated luciferase as a reporter system. The HeLa T4 cells used, expressed CD4 and CXCR4, and the applied HeLa KS386 cells expressed HIV NL4-3 gp160. By combining HeLa T4 cells with HeLa KS386 cells, an approximately about 100- to 300-fold increase in luciferase activity could be elicited relative to the control. The addition of anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (Mab) (RPA-T4) or anti-CXCR4 Mab (12G5) in the assay significantly inhibited the fusion event; in contrast, an anti-CCR5 Mab (2D7) had no effect, indicating that the fusion assay was CD4 and CXCR4 dependent. In this report, fusion events could be monitored by both the luciferase reporter system and syncytia formation. Fusion events were monitored and compared using these two approaches. The luciferase reporter system was found to be more sensitive than syncytia formation. Moreover, compared with previous HIV fusion models, such as using recombinant vaccinia viruses, this system has several advantages, including simplicity and sensitivity. Finally, the system provides a powerful tool to study fusion mechanisms mediated by T-tropic HIV gp160, as well as to screen for fusion-blocking antibodies and antiviral agents.

Isolated human astrocytes are not susceptible to infection by M‐ and T‐tropic HIV‐1 strains despite functional expression of the chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4

Within the brain, HIV-1 targets the microglia and astrocytes. Previous studies have reported that viral entry into astrocytes is independent of CD4, in contrast to microglia. We aimed to determine whether chemokine receptors play a role in mediating CD4-independent HIV-1 entry into astrocytes. We found that embryonic astrocytes and microglial cells express CCR5, CCR3, and CXCR4 transcripts. Intracellular calcium levels in astrocytes were found to increase following application of RANTES, MIP-1beta (CCR5-agonist), SDF-1alpha (CXCR4-agonist), but not eotaxin (CCR3-agonist). In microglial cells, eotaxin was also able to modulate internal calcium homeostasis. CD4 was not present at the cell surface of purified astrocytes but CD4 mRNA could be detected by RT-PCR. Neither HIV-1(9533) (R5 isolate) nor HIV-1(LAI) (X4 isolate) penetrated into purified astrocytes. In contrast, mixed CNS cell cultures were infected by HIV-1(9533) and this was inhibited by anti-CD4 mAb in 4/4 tested cultures and by anti-CCR5 mAb in 2/4. Thus, the HIV-1 R5 strain requires CD4 to penetrate into brain cells, suggesting that CCR5 cannot be used as the primary receptor for M-tropic HIV-1 strains in astrocytes. Moreover, inconstant inhibition of HIV-1 entry by anti-CCR5 mAb supports the existence of alternative coreceptors for penetration of M-tropic isolates into brain cells.

HIV-1 infection through the CCR5 receptor is blocked by receptor dimerization.

The identification of the chemokine receptors as receptors for HIV-1 has boosted interest in these molecules, raising expectations for the development of new strategies to prevent HIV-1 infection. The discovery that chemokines block HIV-1 replication has focused attention on identifying their mechanism of action. Previous studies concluded that this inhibitory effect may be mediated by steric hindrance or by receptor down-regulation. We have identified a CCR5 receptor-specific mAb that neither competes with the chemokine for binding nor triggers signaling, as measured by Ca(2+) influx or chemotaxis. The antibody neither triggers receptor down-regulation nor interferes with the R5 JRFL viral strain gp120 binding to CCR5, but blocks HIV-1 replication in both in vitro assays using peripheral blood mononuclear cells as HIV-1 targets, as well as in vivo using human peripheral blood mononuclear cell-reconstituted SCID (severe combined immunodeficient) mice. Our evidence shows that the anti-CCR5 mAb efficiently prevents HIV-1 infection by inducing receptor dimerization. Chemokine receptor dimerization also is induced by chemokines and is required for their anti-HIV-1 activity. In addition to providing a molecular mechanism through which chemokines block HIV-1 infection, these results illustrate the prospects for developing new tools that possess HIV-1 suppressor activity, but lack the undesired inflammatory side effects of the chemokines.

HIV-1 infection through the CCR5 receptor is blocked by receptor dimerization

The identification of the chemokine receptors as receptors for HIV-1 has boosted interest in these molecules, raising expectations for the development of new strategies to prevent HIV-1 infection. The discovery that chemokines block HIV-1 replication has focused attention on identifying their mechanism of action. Previous studies concluded that this inhibitory effect may be mediated by steric hindrance or by receptor down-regulation. We have identified a CCR5 receptor-specific mAb that neither competes with the chemokine for binding nor triggers signaling, as measured by Ca(2+) influx or chemotaxis. The antibody neither triggers receptor down-regulation nor interferes with the R5 JRFL viral strain gp120 binding to CCR5, but blocks HIV-1 replication in both in vitro assays using peripheral blood mononuclear cells as HIV-1 targets, as well as in vivo using human peripheral blood mononuclear cell-reconstituted SCID (severe combined immunodeficient) mice. Our evidence shows that the anti-CCR5 mAb efficiently prevents HIV-1 infection by inducing receptor dimerization. Chemokine receptor dimerization also is induced by chemokines and is required for their anti-HIV-1 activity. In addition to providing a molecular mechanism through which chemokines block HIV-1 infection, these results illustrate the prospects for developing new tools that possess HIV-1 suppressor activity, but lack the undesired inflammatory side effects of the chemokines.

Inhibition of M-tropic HIV-1 infection by the fd phage-gene 3 protein with MIP-1α-binding activity

CCR5 is a chemokine receptor with seven transmembrane-domains. It is expressed on T cells and macrophages and functions as the principal co-receptor for macrophage (M)-tropic strains of HIV-1. The anti-CCR5 monoclonal antibody (mAb) 2D7 inhibits the binding and chemotaxis of the three natural β-chemokine ligands of CCR5, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, MIP-1β, and RANTES, to CCR5 + cells. The mAb also efficiently blocks the infectivity of several M-tropic and dual-tropic HIV-1 strains in vitro. In this study, we attempted to determine the peptide motif recognized with the 2D7 mAb. We isolated phage clones by panning a phage display library using 2D7 and identified three peptide motifs. One of these phage clones (M23) showed a marked inhibitory activity on HIV-1 infection. The unique sequence of 15 amino acids with an internal disulfide bond was inserted in the g3p of the M23 phage clone (M23-g3p). The M23-g3p was purified by fast-performance liquid chromatography (FPLC). We show here that (1) M23-g3p was specifically recognized with anti-CCR5 mAb; (2) M23-g3p showed inhibitory activity on the infectivity of M-tropic but not T-tropic HIV-1 strains; (3) M23-g3p bound to MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and RANTES but not MCP-1. These results suggested that the M23-g3p might mimic the CCR5-binding domain shared by β-chemokines, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and RANTES as well as the HIV-1 infection.

CCR5 Has an Expanded Ligand-Binding Repertoire and Is the Primary Receptor Used by MCP-2 on Activated T Cells

CCR5 is a chemokine receptor expressed by T cells and macrophages, which also functions as the principal coreceptor for macrophage (M)-tropic HIV-1 strains to enter the host cells. In this study, we aim to better understand the ligand-binding profiles of CCR5 and the chemokine-receptor usage on leukocyte cells. We found that MCP-2 could bind to CCR5 transfectants with high affinity and cross-compete effectively with RANTES, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β. MCP-2 is a true agonist for CCR5, eliciting a robust chemotactic response in CCR5 transfectants similar to that of the three known CCR5 ligands and exhibiting cross-desensitization with RANTES in the Ca2+flux response. MCP-4 also bound to CCR5 with high affinity and was efficiently displaced by other CCR5 ligands. However, MCP-4 only partially displaced the binding of radiolabeled MIP-1α and caused a chemotactic response only at high concentrations. Furthermore, MCP-2 inhibited the binding of the M-tropic HIV-1 gp120 envelope glycoprotein to CCR5 and HIV-1 infection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. More importantly, we found that MCP-2 could bind and elicit chemotaxis in CD3-activated and IL-2-maintained T cells, and most of these functions could be specifically inhibited by the anti-CCR5 mAb 2D7, whereas the responses mediated by MIP-1α or MCP-4 were only partially inhibited by 2D7. Thus, although MCP-2 can bind to and signal through CCR1, CCR2b, and CCR5, among which both CCR2 and CCR5 are expressed at high levels on activated T cells, it appears to preferably utilize CCR5 on these cells. In contrast, MIP-1α and MCP-4 seem to activate multiple receptors on the same cells.