Anti-calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies Research Articles

Prospective evaluation of aura during anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody therapy after 52 weeks of treatment

Background: Clinical studies have shown the efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti- CGRP) in migraine patients with and without aura. Early evidence from post hoc and small subgroup analyses suggests that anti-CGRP mAbs reduce the frequency and intensity of aura. Herein, we prospectively assessed the changes in aura after 12 months of anti-CGRP mAb treatment and performed a literature review.Methods: All outpatients treated with anti-CGRP mAbs for one year in two tertiary Headache Centers and who experienced ≥1 episode of aura/month were enrolled. The study reports data from one month before (baseline) and the last three months (months 10, 11, 12) of treatment.Results: Data from 13 patients with a diagnosis of migraine with and without aura were collected. The mean duration from aura onset was 17.8±7.9 years. At baseline nine patients (69.2%) reported visual aura, and four (30.8%) visual and sensory aura. Mean duration of aura episodes was of 34.2±15.7 minutes. At baseline, the mean number of monthly migraine days (MMDs) was 22.3±7.5, and the mean number of MMDs preceded by aura was 9.15±9.0. At month 12 of treatment, there was a significant reduction of MMDs (6.2±9.0, p=0.002) and MMDs with aura (2.6±2.7, p=0.015). Three patients reported episodes of aura without subsequent headache, a phenomenon that was absent prior to treatment. We identified 14 studies that reported changes in aura during anti-CGRP mAbs treatment.Conclusions: This prospective study shows that anti-CGRP mAbs reduce the number of migraine attacks with aura consistently with the reduction of MMDs. Randomized studies with anti-CGRP mAbs specifically assessing migraine aura are required.

Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies improve cognitive function in patients affected by chronic migraine complicated with medication overuse-headache

Background: Migraine represents one of the most disabling neurological diseases in the world. This burden is primarily due to recurrent pain episodes, alongside cognitive function impairments that patients may experience. This paper aims to explore the effect of three anti-calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) – erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab – on the cognitive performance of a sample of patients suffering from migraine using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) questionnaire.Methods: A total of 215 patients suffering from migraine who visited the Modena Headache Center were enrolled. The MoCA questionnaire was filled in by the patients at the baseline and subsequent assessments were conducted at 6 and 12 months thereafter. Additionally, patients were requested to complete the 6-item Headache Impact Test, Migraine Disability Assessment Score, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale every three months.Results: The sample was composed of 82% of female participants and 87% of the enrolled patients were diagnosed with chronic migraine. Following one year of treatment, there was a significant enhancement observed in MoCA scores compared to baseline measurements. Moreover, higher consumption of analgesics, elevated body mass index (BMI), and prolonged chronic migraine history exhibited an inverse correlation with MoCA score improvements after 12 months.Conclusions: Erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab have proven to be effective in relieving the cognitive impairment associated with migraine after 1 year of treatment. These findings underscore the reversibility of cognitive impairment among migraine sufferers, even among those suffering from chronic migraine, as delineated by the majority of the patients under study. This study revealed that prolonged chronic migraine history, higher baseline analgesic intake, and elevated BMI were all predictive of diminished cognitive enhancements following treatment.

Update on Cluster Headaches: From Genetic to Novel Therapeutic Approaches

Cluster headaches affect 0.1% of the population and are four times more common in males than in females. Patients with this condition present with severe unilateral head pain localized in the frontotemporal lobe, accompanied by ipsilateral lacrimation, conjunctival injection, nasal congestion, diaphoresis, miosis, and eyelid edema. Recently, the first genome-wide association study of cluster headaches was conducted with the goal of aggregating data for meta-analyses, identifying genetic risk variants, and gaining biological insights. Although little is known about the pathophysiology of cluster headaches, the trigeminovascular and trigeminal autonomic reflexes and hypothalamic pathways are involved. Among anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies, galcanezumab has been reported to be effective in preventing episodic cluster headaches.

Nonspecific oral medications versus anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for migraine: Asystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

To compare calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) versus nonspecific oral migraine preventives (NOEPs). Insurers mandate step therapy with NOEPs before approving CGRP mAbs. Databases were searched for class I or II randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CGRP mAbs or NOEPs versus placebo for migraine prevention in adults. The primary outcome measure was monthly migraine days (MMD) or moderate to severe headache days. Twelve RCTs for CGRP mAbs, 5 RCTs for topiramate, and 3 RCTs for divalproex were included in the meta-analysis. There was high certainty that CGRP mAbs are more effective than placebo, with weighted mean difference (WMD; 95% confidence interval) of -1.64 (-1.99 to -1.28) MMD, which is compatible with small effect size (Cohen's d -0.25 [-0.34 to -0.16]). Certainty of evidence that topiramate or divalproex is more effective than placebo was very low and low, respectively (WMD -1.45 [-1.52 to -1.38] and -1.65 [-2.30 to -1.00], respectively; Cohen's d -1.25 [-2.47 to -0.03] and -0.48 [-0.67 to -0.29], respectively). Trial sequential analysis showed that information size was adequate and that CGRP mAbs had clear benefit versus placebo. Network meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between CGRP mAbs and topiramate (WMD -0.19 [-0.56 to 0.17]) or divalproex (0.01 [-0.73 to 0.75]). No significant difference was seen between topiramate or divalproex (0.21 [-0.45 to 0.86]). There is high certainty that CGRP mAbs are more effective than placebo, but the effect size is small. When feasible, CGRP mAbs may be prescribed as first-line preventives; topiramate or divalproex could be as effective but are less well tolerated. The findings of this study support the recently published 2024 position of the American Headache Society on the use of CGRP mAbs as the first-line treatment.

Synergism of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies and OnabotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine: A Real-World Retrospective Chart Review.

Many patients with chronic migraine do not achieve clinically meaningful improvement in their headache frequency with monotherapy. The burden associated with chronic migraine calls for a multifaceted treatment approach targeting multiple aspects of migraine pathophysiology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of concurrent anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody (mAb) and onabotulinumtoxinA (onabot) treatment on median monthly migraine days (MMD) in patients with chronic migraine, through a retrospective study. The electronic medical records of Cleveland Clinic patients either concurrently (dual therapy) or consecutively (monotherapy) treated with anti-CGRP mAbs and onabot between June 2018 and November 2021 were extracted. Only adult patients (≥ 18years of age) were included in this study. MMDs for 194 concurrently treated (86.6% female and a median [interquartile range] age of 51 [41-61] years) and 229 consecutively treated (88.2% female and median age of 47 [IQR 39-57] years) patients were examined at baseline, after first therapy of either anti-CGRP mAb or onabot, and following dual therapy for 3 consecutive months. The reduction of MMDs for each treatment group were compared. The same approach was utilized to compare consecutive monotherapy at separate times (n = 229) and dual-therapy groups. The initial treatment of the dual-therapy group reduced the median (IQR) MMDs from 30 (30-30) to 15 (12-30) [p < 0.0001]. After initiation of dual therapy, the median MMDs was further decreased from 15 (12-30) to 8 (3-22) [p < 0.0001]. A majority [132/194 (68.0%)] of the dual-therapy patients reported a ≥ 50% reduction in MMD and 90/194 (46.4%) reported a ≥ 75% reduction. For the consecutive monotherapy group, median MMDs changed from a baseline of 30 (25-30) to 15 (8-25) from onabot monotherapy and decreased from 25 (15-30) to 12 (4-25) after anti-CGRP mAb monotherapy. Almost half (113/229 [49.3%] from onabot, and 104/229 [45.4%] from anti-CGRP mAb) of these patients achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs and a minority (38/229 [16.6%] from onabot, and 45/229 [19.7%] from anti-CGRP mAb) achieved a reduction of ≥ 75%. Additionally, dual therapy showed significant improvement in MMDs compared with monotherapy of either treatment (p < 0.0001). Dual therapy of anti-CGRP mAbs and onabot may be more efficacious than monotherapy, possibly due to their synergistic mechanisms of action.

Anti-calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine: Focus on Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

The calcitonin gene-related peptide transmission was the target for recent development of drugs that effectively prevent attacks of both episodic and chronic migraine. The aim of this narrative review was to offer deeper insight into pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies approved for prevention of migraine attacks. For this narrative review, relevant literature was searched for in MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases, covering periods 1966-2023 and 2006-2023, respectively. The ClinicalTrials.gov database was also searched for relevant clinical studies whose results had not been published previously in medical journals, covering the period 2000-2023. The monoclonal antibodies from this group are distributed mainly in the plasma and part of the extracellular space; they are neither metabolized in the liver nor excreted via the kidneys. The elimination of galcanezumab, eptinezumab and fremanezumab takes place only by a non-specific linear process via the reticuloendothelial system in the liver, while erenumab is eliminated by a non-specific process and by a specific, saturable process because of binding to receptors located on the cell membrane. Since the elimination processes do not have a large capacity, the half-life is about 2 weeks for erenumab and about 4 weeks for other monoclonal antibodies. Variability in the pharmacokinetics of these monoclonal antibodies is small in different subpopulations, and body weight is the only parameter to consider when choosing the dose of these drugs.

Anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine: Focus on Drug Interactions.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide neurotransmission was the target for recent development of monoclonal antibodies that effectively prevent attacks of both episodic and chronic migraine. The aim of this narrative review was to offer deeper insight into drug-drug, drug-food and drug-disease interactions of monoclonal antibodies approved for prevention of migraine attacks. For this narrative review, relevant literature was searched for in MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases, covering the 1966-2023 and 2006-2023 periods, respectively. The ClinicalTrials.gov database was also searched for relevant clinical studies whose results had not been published previously in medical journals, covering 2000-2023. Monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab and eptinezumab) augment prophylactic action of gepants and onabotulinumtoxin A and somewhat increase efficacy of triptans used to abort migraine attacks; however, their adverse reactions may also be augmented. Pharmacokinetic interactions and interactions in general with drugs used for other indications except migraine are negligible, as are drug-food interactions. However, monoclonal antibodies may worsen diseases with already weakened CGRP neurotransmission, Raynaud phenomenon and constipation. Monoclonal antibodies used for prevention of migraine do not engage in significant pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs; however, they do engage in pharmacodynamic interactions with other anti-migraine drugs, additively augmenting their prophylactic action, but also increasing frequency and severity of adverse reactions, which are a consequence of the CGRP neurotransmission interruption.

Cardiovascular Adverse Drug Reactions of Anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prevention: An Analysis from the European Spontaneous Adverse Event Reporting System.

Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP-mAbs) have recently been approved for the prevention of migraine, and their safety profile is not fully characterized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of anti-CGRP-mAbs through the analysis of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) collected in the EudraVigilance (EV) database, with a specific focus on cardiovascular (CV) ADRs. Data on ICSRs recorded between July 2018 and December 2022 in the EV database, involving one of the anti-CGRP-mAbs for migraine prevention-erenumab (ERE), galcanezumab (GMB), fremanezumab (FMB), and eptinezumab (EPT)-were included in the analysis. All ICSRs reporting at least one CV ADR, as identified within the MedDRA® System Organ Classes (SOCs) "cardiac disorders" or "vascular disorders," were selected for the analysis. The frequency of disproportionate reporting was expressed as the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI), to evaluate the frequency of reporting of CV ADRs for each anti-CGRP-mAb compared with all other monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). A case-by-case analysis was conducted paying particular attention to serious CV ADR reports, focusing on the type of seriousness, age group, sex, and concomitant drugs. A total of 9441 ICSRs were recorded in the EV database from 2018 to 2022, of which more than half were related to ERE (58.9%), followed by GMB (21.4%), FMB (19.0%), and EPT (0.7%). CV ICSRs accounted for 1205 cases (12.8%), with a total of 1599 CV ADRs. The CV ICSRs were mainly related to female patients (82.6%) aged 18-64 years (73.4%). Of the reported CV ADRs, 67.5% were considered serious. Among the total number of ICSRs related to each anti-CGRP-mAb, those associated with FMB had a higher percentage of CV ADRs (n = 253; 14.1%), followed by ERE (n = 707; 12.7%), EPT (n = 8; 12.7%), and GMB (n = 237; 11.7%). A higher frequency of reporting hypertension was shown for ERE (ROR = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.14-1.85). Pallor was mainly observed with FMB (5.00; 1.68-14.89), as well as deep vein thrombosis (3.86; 1.57-9.51), hot flush (2.16; 1.43-3.25), and palpitations (1.48; 1.05-2.08). Atrial fibrillation (2.36; 1.02-5.46) and myocardial infarction (2.21; 1.37-3.58) were mostly reported for GMB. The analysis of anti-CGRP-related CV ADRs was consistent with the information reported in the literature. However, hypertension with ERE, atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarction with GMB, as well as pallor, deep vein thrombosis, hot flush, and palpitations with FMB were not reported in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPCs). Considering this, more post-marketing analyses are needed to improve knowledge on the CV safety profiles of anti-CGRP-mAbs, especially for the last approved medication, EPT.

Adverse event reporting of four anti-Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.

Background: Anti-Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) have shown significant efficacy in preventing migraine. However, there have been limited reports of adverse events (AEs) after marketing, particularly for eptinezumab launched in 2020. The study aimed to mine and analyze the AE signals with four anti-CGRP mAbs from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to gain insights into the safety profile of these medications post-marketing. Methods: All AE reports on the four anti-CGRP mAbs (erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab) were retrieved from the FAERS database from the first quarter (Q1) of 2018 to Q1 of 2023. Disproportionality analysis was measured by reporting odd ratio (ROR) and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) to identify potential AE signals. Comparisons were made between the four drugs in terms of AEs. Results: A total of 38,515 reports of erenumab, 19,485 reports of galcanezumab, 5,332 reports of fremanezumab, and 2,460 reports of eptinezumab were obtained, mostly reported in the second to third year after launch in the market. The common AEs to erenumab included constipation (17.93%), injection site pain (14.08%), and alopecia (7.23%). The AEs that occurred more frequently with galcanezumab included injection site pain (24.37%), injection site erythema (5.35%), and injection site haemorrhage (4.97%). Common AEs related to fremanezumab were injection site pain (13.10%), injection site erythema (7.02%), and injection site pruritus (5.47%). Fatigue (13.54%), throat irritation (9.02%), and pruritus (8.20%) were the most common AEs with eptinezumab. In addition, there are new AEs that were not listed in the drug instructions but occurred concurrently with multiple drugs, such as Raynaud's phenomenon, weight increase, menstrual disorders, throat tightness, and paraesthesia oral. Conclusion: Common AE signals of the four anti-CGRP mAbs and new AE signals were found to provide a reference for clinical drug selection in clinical practice.

Switching anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in chronic migraine: real-world observations of erenumab, fremanezumab and galcanezumab

ObjectivesThe anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP-mAb) are effective in migraine; however, few studies have examined the benefit of switching from one anti-CGRP-mAb to another. In order to better inform...

Real-World Use of Ubrogepant as Acute Treatment for Migraine with an Anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody: Results from COURAGE.

Although acute and preventive treatments for migraine are commonly given in combination, data on the real-world effectiveness of ubrogepant as an acute treatment when used with an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody (with or without onabotulinumtoxinA) are limited. This analysis sought to evaluate the real-world effectiveness, treatment satisfaction, and optimization of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine when used in combination with an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody, with or without concomitant onabotulinumtoxinA. This prospective, multiple-attack, open-label, observational study (COURAGE) assessed meaningful pain relief (MPR), return to normal function (RNF), treatment satisfaction, and acute treatment optimization of ubrogepant (50 or 100mg) when combined with an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody, onabotulinumtoxinA, or both in adult users of Migraine Buddy, a migraine tracking application. In the ubrogepant and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody arm (n = 245), following the first ubrogepant-treated attack, 61.6% (151/245) and 80.4% (197/245) of ubrogepant-treated participants achieved MPR at 2 and 4h post-dose, respectively, and 34.7% (85/245) and 55.5% (136/245) achieved RNF at 2 and 4h post-dose, respectively. Across up to 10 ubrogepant-treated attacks (N = 1153), MPR was achieved in 51.3% (592/1153) and 73.5% (847/1153) at 2 and 4h post-dose, respectively. RNF was achieved by 32.2% (371/1153) and 53.2% (613/1153) at 2 and 4h post-dose. After 30days, 72.7% (168/231) of participants reported satisfaction (using a 7-point scale) with ubrogepant when used in combination with an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody, and 79.7% (184/231) of participants achieved acute treatment optimization (defined as moderate-maximum treatment efficacy using the Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire-4). Real-world ubrogepant use with an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody was associated with MPR, RNF, satisfaction, and acute treatment optimization.

Patterns of anti-CGRP mAbs use and variation of triptan consumption following treatment initiation: A descriptive drug utilization study in the Tuscany region, Italy.

To describe the pattern of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) utilization in the Tuscany region, Italy, and the variation of triptan consumption after treatment initiation. Given the recent commercialization of anti-CGRP mAbs as migraine preventive medications, real-world evidence on their patterns of utilization and their impact on migraine abortive medication use is still limited. A retrospective, descriptive, cohort study on the real-world utilization of anti-CGRP mAbs was performed using the population-based regional administrative database of Tuscany. Patients with ≥1 anti-CGRP mAb dispensing (namely erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab) between April 1, 2019, and September 30, 2021, were identified. The first dispensing was the cohort entry (CE). New users (NUs) were patients with no anti-CGRP mAb dispensing before CE. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were plotted to describe the cumulative probability of remaining with the initial anti-CGRP mAb during a 15-month follow-up period as a measure of treatment persistence. Among NUs with ≥2 triptan dispensings during the 6 months before CE (i.e., baseline), the mean monthly number of triptan dosage units dispensed was measured in five consecutive follow-up time windows (months 1-3, 4-6, 7-9, 10-12, 13-15) and the difference from the baseline was calculated. A total of 624 NUs (erenumab = 295, galcanezumab = 223, fremanezumab = 106) were identified, of whom 188 (78%) were women. Mean age was 49.2 years (standard deviation [SD] = 12.6). The survival to discontinuation at 6, 12, and 15 months was about 69%, 48%, and 6%, respectively. The survival to switch was about 6% at 15 months. The observed variation of triptan consumption at 3/6/9/12/15 months and the corresponding SD was -4.4 [8.2]/-5.2 [9.0]/-5.5 [9.2]/-5.4 [9.2]/-4.5 [10.0], respectively. Patient demographics reflect the place of these medications in therapy. Overall, findings seem to indicate a favorable tolerability and effectiveness profile. Further studies are warranted to better establish the long-term comparative effectiveness, safety, and cost effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs compared to other preventive medications.

A retrospective analysis of migraine prophylaxis with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies at the hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics

Background. Migraine is a primary headache disorder described by episodic attacks that can progress to chronic migraine. Preventive treatment of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) is currently being widely investigated worldwide.Materials and methods. A total of 85 patients with migraine were enrolled in a retrospective study conducted in 2019-2021. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed. Subjects were divided into groups by migraine course: chronic migraine (CM) and episodic migraine (EM), and according to the medicine used (erenumab, fremanezumab). Treatment efficacy was assessed at 3 and 6 months after the start of treatment. A reduction of &gt;50% in monthly headache days (MHDs) was considered a good response. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistics 27.0, the χ² test of homogeneity, Fisher’s exact, Student’s t, and Mann-Whitney tests.Results. Of the 85 migraine patients, 75 (88.2%) were women. EM was diagnosed in 33 (38.8%) and CM in 52 (61.2%) patients. After treatment, the number of MHDs was significantly reduced in both anti-CGRP mAbs therapy groups (p&lt;0.001). The response to anti-CGRP mAbs was similar between the EM and CM groups. A slightly better response was achieved with fremanezumab than erenumab (83.3% vs. 73.1% at 3 months; 83.3% vs. 65.7% at 6 months), but the difference was not significant (p=0.541; p=0.149). In 24 (58.5%) patients initially given 70 mg erenumab, after a median follow-up of 3 months (interquartile range: 2-6) it was decided to increase the dose of erenumab to 140 mg due to insufficient effect. The initial dose was increased more often in patients with chronic migraine (p=0.027).Conclusions. Erenumab and fremanezumab are equally effective and equivalent for both migraine types. It was observed that more than half of the patients required a dose increase when treated with erenumab 70 mg, especially in CM group.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) Monoclonal Antibodies in Preventing Migraines: A Systematic Review.

The neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is an essential pathophysiological treatment for migraines. A unique class of medications called CGRP monoclonal antibodies target CGRP and its receptor and have demonstrated promising benefits in the treatment and prevention of migraines. This study sought to identify and assess the quality of existing systematic reviews about the effectiveness of CGRP antibodies for preventing migraines, as well as systematically review and synthesize the evidence on these topics. This included the four Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab. The effectiveness and safety of these monoclonal antibodies in preventing migraines should also be examined in light of patient characteristics, and any gaps in the body of knowledge should be noted in order to suggest new lines of investigation. Data gathering included a thorough search of internet databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus) for relevant research released between 2018 and 2023. The findings imply that CGRP monoclonal antibodies are efficient and secure for preventing migraines and may be considered a first-line alternative for treating migraines and drug misuse. The results further imply that combination treatment with CGRP antibodies and onabotulinumtoxinA may enhance the prevention of migraine in adults. With suggestions for more studies to find and address these variables, the significance of genetic and epigenetic factors in the progression of pediatric patients' acute postoperative pain to chronic postsurgical pain is underlined. All four anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies, erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab, were shown to be safe and effective for the prevention of migraine when the research additionally looked at their individual effectiveness and safety. Additionally, the study discovered considerable variances in effectiveness amongst various groups. However, further investigation is required to establish the best time and dosage and the effect of patient characteristics on the effectiveness and safety of these medications.

Translated article] Consensus recommendations on the preventive treatment of migraine

ObjectiveThe objectives are to know the opinion of neurologists and hospital pharmacists on those aspects still under debate regarding the role of anti-Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide monoclonal antibodies in the preventive treatment of migraine. To identify those controversies that still exist. To propose agreed recommendations for improvement of care. And to promote access of clinicians and patients to these new treatments in the prevention of migraine with biological drugs, in order to improve patient care and follow-up. MethodologyRecommendations for the use of biological drugs in the prevention of migraine were identified and evaluated through the Delphi consensus methodology, proposing 88 statements grouped into 3 themes: a clinical module that deals with the management of biological treatments in migraine; a patient module that discusses patient education and adherence improvement strategies; and a coordination module that includes statements related to strategies to improve joint work between the two groups. The 9-point Likert ordinal scale was used to score these recommendations and, subsequently, the data was statistically analysed through different metrics. ResultsAfter both rounds of voting, consensus was reached in agreement on 71 of the 88 statements (80.7%), leaving 1 statement (1.1%) with consensus in disagreement and 16 remaining as indeterminate (18.2%). ConclusionsThe high degree of consensus indicates that the opinion of neurologists and hospital pharmacists on the role of anti-Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide monoclonal antibodies in the preventive treatment of migraine is very similar and allows identifying those controversies that still exist, to improve the care and follow-up of patients with migraine.

Switching between anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies: A comparison of monthly and quarterly dosing

BackgroundAnti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRPmAbs) have dramatically changed preventive treatment options for patients with migraine. Although there is emerging real-world evidence on the use of CGRPmAbs globally, the change in efficacy and safety after switching between CGRPmAbs owing to patients' frequency of hospital visits preference remains unknown. MethodsWe conducted a single-centre, retrospective, real-world study of patients with migraine who first received galcanezumab for 3 or 4 months and then switched to fremanezumab at Keio University Hospital. We investigated changes in monthly migraine days (MMD), responder rate, and adverse effects such as injection site reactions. ResultsMMD increased only by 0.7 (95% CI, −4.1–5.5; p = 0.748) after 4 months of treatment with fremanezumab (6.1, 95% CI, 2.3–9.9) compared to before switching (5.4, 95% CI, 2.2–8.6). Furthermore, switching from galcanezumab to fremanezumab produced only minor adverse events, such as injection site reactions. ConclusionsAfter switching from galcanezumab to fremanezumab out of the desire to visit the hospital less often, the reduction in MMD compared to baseline was sustained, and no serious adverse effects were observed.

Combined Prophylaxis of Chronic Migraine with OnabotulinumtoxinA and Anti-CGRP Antibodies

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of adding large molecule anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to onabotulinumtoxinA (OBT-A) for chronic migraine prevention. Background: Chronic migraine (CM) is a highly prevalent, debilitating disorder that leads to personal, social, and economic burdens. Both OBT-A and mAbs are proven safe and effective in chronic migraine prevention. The use of combination therapy has not been formally studied but may prove more effective than either monotherapy alone in select patients. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of patients with chronic migraine, treated with OBT-A, who received additional mAb preventative therapy. The primary endpoint was migraine headache days per month (MHD) after 3 months of combined therapy. Secondary endpoints included total headache days per month, headache intensity, disability level, and use of abortive medications. Results: Of 1503 patients reviewed, 133 met inclusion criteria. At 3 months of combined therapy, mean reduction of MHD from baseline was 6.2 (95% CI 4.91 to 7.49, p &lt; 0.0001). Nearly 2/3rd of patients (60.9%) experienced ≥ 50% MHD reduction. Fewer patients reported high disability level (14.6% [17/126], compared to 29.4%) and high headache intensity (13.0% [16/119], compared to 51.3%) at 3 months (all p &lt; 0.0001). A reduction in abortive medication doses needed and discontinuation of concomitant oral preventative medications was also noted in 15.8% and 6.8% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Combined therapy with OBT-A and mAbs is well-tolerated, effective in further reducing migraine frequency, and may improve quality of life for patients with CM refractory to monotherapy.

Meta-regression to explain the placebo effects in clinical trials of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention

Background: Commonly used methods of comparison (e.g. network meta-analyses) require common comparator(s) across trials, such as placebo in placebo-controlled trials. Recent literature indicates that route of administration differences across placebo arms of clinical trials in pain disorders may contribute to differences in placebo effect.Methods: We conducted a meta-regression on placebo data from pivotal clinical trials of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention to quantify the impact of route of administration, migraine type (episodic/chronic), and number of prior treatment failures on placebo reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs) across weeks 1–12 of treatment. A systematic literature review of Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature conducted in June 2021 identified 14 relevant, randomized placebo-controlled trials for analysis.Results: After testing models with different covariates, a meta-regression was fitted to the extracted placebo data with the covariates of route of administration, migraine type, and proportion of patients with ≥2 prior preventive treatment failures. An intravenous route of administration for the placebo arm was a predictor for higher MMD reduction. Predictors of lower MMD reduction were migraine type (episodic migraine) and a higher proportion of patients having ≥2 failed preventive treatments.Conclusions: The efficacy of intravenous anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies are likely underestimated, and differences in the route of administration of placebo may necessitate use of alternative methods that do not assume the presence of a common comparator when comparing anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine prevention. Further research into the contextual effects of the placebo effect is warranted.

Galcanezumab in patients with episodic migraine: results from the open-label period of the phase 3 PERSIST study

BackgroundThe phase 3 randomized PERSIST study demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of galcanezumab, a humanized anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody for prevention of episodic migraines. We present findings from the open-label extension (OLE) of PERSIST, which evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in patients from China, India, and Russia.MethodsPatients completing the 3-month double-blind period of PERSIST were eligible for the 3-month OLE. Patients previously randomized to galcanezumab (GMB/GMB group) continued to receive galcanezumab 120 mg at all three visits during the OLE whereas patients randomized to placebo received a 240 mg loading dose of galcanezumab and then two 120 mg doses (PBO/GMB group). The primary outcome was the mean change (from double-blind baseline) in the number of monthly migraine headache days (MHDs) to month 6. Other endpoints included percent reduction in monthly MHDs from double-blind baseline to month 6, functional outcomes, safety and tolerability.ResultsOverall, 99% of patients completing the double-blind period entered the OLE, and 96% completed through month 6. Patients in the GMB/GMB group achieved continued improvements in efficacy, with the reduction from baseline in the mean number of monthly MHDs, and slightly increasing from 4.01 days at the end of the double-blind period to 4.62 at the end of the OLE. Of patients who were ≥ 50% responders to galcanezumab at month 3, 66% maintained this response through to month 6. Patients in the PBO/GMB group experienced a rapid reduction in the number of monthly MHDs after initiation of galcanezumab, with a mean reduction from baseline of 4.56 days by month 6. The long-term benefits of galcanezumab were also supported by improvements in other efficacy and functional endpoints. All safety findings were consistent with the known long-term safety profile of galcanezumab; no patients experienced a treatment-related serious adverse event.ConclusionsGalcanezumab was efficacious and well-tolerated in patients with episodic migraine from China, India and Russia, for up to 6 months.Trial registrationClinicalTrisABSTRACT_pals.gov NCT03963232, registered May 24, 2019.

Persistence to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and onabotulinumtoxinA among patients with migraine: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundTo date, real-world evidence on persistence to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or onabotulinumtoxinA have excluded eptinezumab. This retrospective cohort study was performed to compare treatment persistency among patients with migraine on anti-CGRP mAbs (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, or eptinezumab) or onabotulinumtoxinA.MethodsThis retrospective study used IQVIA PharmMetrics data. Adult patients with migraine treated with an anti-CGRP mAb or onabotulinumtoxinA who had 12 months of continuous insurance enrollment before starting treatment were included. A “most recent treatment episode” analysis was used in which the most recent episode was defined as the latest treatment period with the same drug (anti-CGRP mAb or onabotulinumtoxinA) without a ≥ 15-day gap in medication supply on/after June 25, 2020, to December 31, 2021. Patients were indexed at the start of their most recent episode. Patients were considered non-persistent and discontinued the therapy associated with their most recent episode if there was ≥ 15-day gap in medication supply. A Cox proportional-hazards model estimated the discontinuation hazard between treatments. The gap periods and cohort definition were varied in sensitivity analyses.ResultsThe study included 66,576 patients (median age 46 years, 88.6% female). More eptinezumab-treated patients had chronic migraine (727/1074), ≥ 3 previous acute (323/1074) or preventive (333/1074) therapies, and more prior treatment episodes (3) than other treatment groups. Based on a 15-day treatment gap, patients on subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAbs had a 32% (95% CI: 1.19, 1.49; erenumab), 42% (95% CI: 1.27, 1.61; galcanezumab), and 58% (95% CI: 1.42, 1.80; fremanezumab) higher discontinuation hazard than those receiving eptinezumab, with this relationship attenuated, but still statistically significant based on 30-day and 60-day treatment gaps. There was no significant difference in the discontinuation hazard between eptinezumab and onabotulinumtoxinA. Based on a 15-day treatment gap among patients who newly initiated therapy, the discontinuation hazard of subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAbs remained significantly higher compared to eptinezumab and onabotulinumtoxinA.ConclusionPatients treated with eptinezumab demonstrated persistency that was higher than subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAbs and similar to onabotulinumtoxinA.Graphical