Anteromedial Rotatory Instability Research Articles

Double-Bundle Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Improves Anteromedial Rotatory Instability

Background: New techniques have been proposed to better address anteromedial rotatory instability in a medial collateral ligament (MCL)–injured knee that require an extra graft and more surgical implants, which might not be feasible in every clinical setting. Purpose: To investigate if improved resistance to anteromedial rotatory instability can be achieved by using a single-graft, double-bundle (DB) MCL reconstruction with a proximal fixation more anteriorly on the tibia, in comparison with the gold standard single-bundle (SB) MCL reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic simulator in intact knee, superficial MCL/deep MCL–deficient, and reconstruction states. Three different reconstructions were tested: DB MCL no proximal tibial fixation and DB and SB MCL reconstruction with proximal tibial fixation. Knee kinematics were recorded at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion for the following measurements: 8 N·m of valgus rotation (VR), 5 N·m of external tibial rotation, 5 N·m of internal tibial rotation, combined 89 N of anterior tibial translation and 5 N·m of external rotation for anteromedial rotation (AMR) and anteromedial translation (AMT). The differences between each state for every measurement were analyzed with VR and AMR/AMT as primary outcomes. Results: Cutting the superficial MCL/deep MCL increased VR and AMR/AMT in all knee positions except at 90° for VR (P < .05). All reconstructions restored VR to the intact state except at 90° of knee flexion (P < .05). The DB MCL no proximal tibial fixation reconstruction could not restore intact AMR/AMT kinematics in any knee position (P < .05). Adding an anterior-based proximal tibial fixation restored intact AMR/AMT kinematics at ≥30° of knee flexion except at 90° for AMT (P < .05). The SB MCL reconstruction could not restore intact AMR/AMT kinematics at 0° and 90° of knee flexion (P < .05). Conclusion: In this in vitro cadaveric study, a DB MCL reconstruction with anteriorly placed proximal tibial fixation was able to control AMR and AMT better than the gold standard SB MCL reconstruction. Clinical Relevance: In patients with anteromedial rotatory instability and valgus instability, a DB MCL reconstruction may be superior to the SB MCL reconstruction, without causing extra surgical morbidity or additional costs.

Load Sharing of the Deep and Superficial Medial Collateral Ligaments, the Effect of a Partial Superficial Medial Collateral Injury, and Implications on ACL Load

Background: Injuries to the deep medial collateral ligament (dMCL) and partial superficial MCL (psMCL) can cause anteromedial rotatory instability; however, the contribution of each these injuries in restraining anteromedial rotatory instability and the effect on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) load remain unknown. Purpose: To investigate the contributions of the different MCL structures in restraining tibiofemoral motion and to evaluate the load through the ACL after MCL injury, especially after combined dMCL/psMCL injury. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Sixteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic simulator. Tibiofemoral kinematic parameters were recorded at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion for the following measurements: 8-N·m valgus rotation, 4-N·m external tibial rotation (ER), 4-N·m internal tibial rotation, and a combined 89-N anterior tibial translation and 4-N·m ER for both anteromedial rotation (AMR) and anteromedial translation (AMT). The kinematic parameters of the 3 different MCL injuries (dMCL; dMCL/psMCL; dMCL/superficial MCL (sMCL)) were recorded and reapplied either in an ACL-deficient joint (load sharing) or before and after cutting the ACL (ACL load). The loads were calculated by applying the principle of superposition. Results: The dMCL had the largest effect on reducing the force/torque during ER, AMR, and AMT in extension and the psMCL injury at 30° to 90° of knee flexion (P < .05). In a comparison of the load through the ACL when the MCL was intact, the ACL load increased by 46% and 127% after dMCL injury and combined dMCL/psMCL injury, respectively, at 30° of knee flexion during ER. In valgus rotation, a significant increase in ACL load was seen only at 90° of knee flexion. Conclusion: The psMCL injury made the largest contribution to the reduction of net force/torque during AMR/AMT at 30° to 90° of flexion. Concomitant dMCL/psMCL injury increased the ACL load, mainly during ER. Clinical Relevance: If a surgical procedure is being considered to treat anteromedial rotatory instability, then the procedure should focus on restoring sMCL function, as injury to this structure causes a major loss of the knee joint’s capacity to restrain AMR/AMT.

Effect of a Partial Superficial and Deep Medial Collateral Ligament Injury on Knee Joint Laxity.

Injuries to the medial collateral ligament (MCL), specifically the deep MCL (dMCL) and superficial MCL (sMCL), are both reported to be factors in anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI); however, a partial sMCL (psMCL) injury is often present, the effect of which on AMRI is unknown. To investigate the effect of a dMCL injury with or without a psMCL injury on knee joint laxity. Controlled laboratory study. Sixteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic simulator. The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was cut first and last in protocols 1 and 2, respectively. The dMCL was cut completely, followed by an intermediary psMCL injury state before the sMCL was completely sectioned. Tibiofemoral kinematics were measured at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion for the following measurements: 8 N·m of valgus rotation (VR), 4 N·m of external tibial rotation, 4 N·m of internal tibial rotation, and combined 89 N of anterior tibial translation and 4 N·m of external tibial rotation for both anteromedial rotation (AMR) and anteromedial translation. The differences between subsequent states, as well as differences with respect to the intact state, were analyzed. In an ACL-intact or -deficient joint, a combined dMCL and psMCL injury increased external tibial rotation and VR compared with the intact state at all angles. A significant increase in AMR was seen in the ACL-intact knee after this combined injury. Cutting the dMCL alone showed lower mean increases in AMR compared with the psMCL injury, which were significant only when the ACL was intact in knee flexion. Moreover, cutting the dMCL had no effect on VR. The ACL was the most important structure in controlling anteromedial translation, followed by the psMCL or dMCL depending on the knee flexion angle. A dMCL injury alone may produce a small increase in AMRI but not in VR. A combined dMCL and psMCL injury caused an increase in AMRI and VR. In clinical practice, if an increase in AMRI at 30° and 90° of knee flexion is seen together with some increase in VR, a combined dMCL and psMCL injury should be suspected.

A Comparative Biomechanical Study of Alternative Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Techniques

Background: There is little evidence of the biomechanical performance of medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstructions for restoring stability to the MCL-deficient knee regarding valgus, external rotation (ER), and anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI). Hypothesis: A short isometric reconstruction will better restore stability than a longer superficial MCL (sMCL) reconstruction, and an additional deep MCL (dMCL) graft will better control ER and AMRI than single-strand reconstructions. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Nine cadaveric human knees were tested in a kinematics rig that allowed tibial loading while the knee was flexed-extended 0° to 100°. Optical markers were placed on the femur and tibia and displacements were measured using a stereo camera system. The knee was tested intact, and then after MCL (sMCL + dMCL) transection, and loaded in anterior tibial translation (ATT), ER, varus-valgus, and combined ATT + ER (AMRI loading). Five different isometric MCL reconstructions were tested: isolated long sMCL, a short construct, each with and without dMCL addition, and isolated dMCL reconstruction, using an 8 mm–wide synthetic graft. Results: MCL deficiency caused an increase in ER of 4° at 0° of flexion (P = .271) up to 14° at 100° of flexion (P = .002), and valgus laxity increased by 5° to 8° between 0° and 100° of flexion (P < .024 at 0°-90°). ATT did not increase significantly in isolated MCL deficiency (P > .999). All 5 reconstructions restored native stability across the arc of flexion apart from the isolated long sMCL, which demonstrated residual ER instability (P≤ .047 vs other reconstructions). Conclusion: All tested techniques apart from the isolated long sMCL graft are satisfactory in the context of restoring the valgus, ER, and AMRI stability to the MCL-deficient knee in a cadaveric model. Clinical Relevance: Contemporary MCL reconstruction techniques fail to control ER and therefore AMRI as they use a long sMCL graft and do not address the dMCL. This study compares 5 MCL reconstruction techniques. Both long and short isometric constructs other than the long sMCL achieved native stability in valgus and ER/AMRI. Double-strand reconstructions (sMCL + dMCL) tended to provide more stability. This study shows which reconstructions demonstrate the best biomechanical performance, informs surgical reconstruction techniques for AMRI, and questions the efficacy of current popular techniques.

Noninvasive and Reliable Quantification of Anteromedial Rotatory Knee Laxity: A Pilot Study on Healthy Individuals

Background: Anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI) of the knee is a complex and severe condition caused by injury to the anterior cruciate ligament and/or the medial collateral ligament. Clinical studies dealing with AMRI are rare, and objective measurements are nonexistent. Purpose/Hypothesis: The objectives of this study were, first, to quantify anteromedial rotatory knee laxity in healthy individuals using a noninvasive image analysis software and, second, to assess intra- and interrater reliability and equivalence in measuring anteromedial knee translation (AMT). It was hypothesized that AMT could be reliably quantified using a noninvasive image analysis software. Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This prospective proof-of-concept study included healthy individuals aged 16 to 40 years with no history of knee injury or surgery. Three adhesive surface markers were placed on predefined landmarks on the medial side of the knee. Three independent investigators examined anteromedial rotatory knee laxity with an anterior drawer test in different tibial rotations (neutral tibial rotation, 15° of external tibial rotation, and 15° of internal tibial rotation). The entire examination of each knee was recorded, and AMT including the side-to-side difference (SSD) was assessed using a freely available and validated image analysis software (PIVOT iPad application). Group comparisons were performed using a 1-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc analysis. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess inter- and intrarater reliability of AMT measurements. Equivalence of measurements was evaluated using the 2 one-sided t-test procedure. Results: Anteromedial rotatory knee laxity was assessed in 30 knees of 15 participants (53% male) with a mean age of 26.2 ± 3.5 years. In all 3 raters, the highest AMT was observed in neutral tibial rotation (range of means, 2.2-3.0 mm), followed by external tibial rotation (range of means, 2.0-2.4 mm) and internal tibial rotation (range of means, 1.8-2.2 mm; P < .05). Intrarater reliability of AMT (ICC, 0.88-0.96) and SSD (ICC, 0.61-0.96) measurements was good to excellent and moderate to excellent, respectively. However, interrater reliability was poor to moderate for AMT (ICC, 0.44-0.73) and SSD (ICC, 0.12-0.69) measurements. Statistically significant equivalence of AMT and SSD measurements was observed between and within raters for almost all testing conditions. Conclusion: Anteromedial rotatory knee laxity could be quantified using a noninvasive image analysis software, with the highest AMT observed during neutral tibial rotation in uninjured individuals. Reliability and equivalence of measurements were good to excellent within raters and moderate between raters.

Isometry of anteromedial reconstructions mimicking the deep medial collateral ligament depends on the femoral insertion.

This study aimed to investigate the length change patterns of the native deep medial collateral ligament (dMCL) and potential anteromedial reconstructions (AMs) that might be added to a reconstruction of the superficial MCL (sMCL)to better understand the control of anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI). Insertion points of the dMCL and potential AM reconstructions were marked with pins (tibial) and eyelets (femoral) in 11 cadaveric knee specimens. Length changes between the pins and eyelets were then tested using threads in a validated kinematics rig with muscle loading of the quadriceps and iliotibial tract. Between 0° and 100° knee flexion, length change pattern of the anterior, middle and posterior part of the dMCL and simulated AM reconstructions were analysed using a rotary encoder. Isometry was tested using the total strain range (TSR). The tibiofemoral distance of the anterior dMCL part lengthened with flexion (+12.7% at 100°), whereas the posterior part slackened with flexion (-12.9% at 100°). The middle part behaved almost isometrically (maximum length: +2.8% at 100°). Depending on the femoral position within the sMCL footprint, AM reconstructions resulted in an increase in length as the knee flexed when a more centred position was used, irrespective of the tibial attachment position. Femoral positioning in the posterior aspect of the sMCL footprint exhibited <4% length change and was slightly less tight in flexion (min TSR = 3.6 ± 1.5%), irrespective of the tibial attachment position. The length change behaviour of potential AM reconstructions in a functionally intact knee is mainly influenced by the position of the femoral attachment, with different tibial attachments having a minimal effect on length change. Surgeons performing AM reconstructions to control AMRI would be advised to choose a femoral graft position in the posterior part of the native sMCL attachment to optimise graft length change behaviour. Given the high frequency of MCL injuries, sufficient restoration of AMRI is essential in isolated and combined ligamentous knee injuries. There is no level of evidence as thisstudy was an experimental laboratory study.

Single-Strand “Short Isometric Construct” Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Restores Valgus and Rotational Stability While Isolated Deep MCL and Superficial MCL Reconstruction Do Not

Background: Historical MCL (medial collateral ligament) reconstruction (MCLR) techniques have focused on the superficial MCL (sMCL) to restore valgus stability while frequently ignoring the importance of the deep MCL (dMCL) in controlling tibial external rotation. The recent recognition of the medial ligament complex importance has multiple studies revisiting medial anatomy and questioning contemporary MCLR techniques. Purpose: To assess whether (1) an isolated sMCL reconstruction (sMCLR), (2) an isolated dMCL reconstruction (dMCLR), or (3) a novel single-strand short isometric construct (SIC) would restore translational and rotational stability to a knee with a dMCL and sMCL injury. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Biomechanical testing was performed on 14 fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens using a custom multiaxial knee activity simulator. The specimens were divided into 2 groups. The first group was tested in 4 states: intact, after sectioning the sMCL and dMCL, isolated sMCLR, and isolated dMCLR. The second group was tested in 3 states: intact, after sectioning the sMCL and dMCL, and after single-strand SIC reconstruction (SICR). In each state, 4 loading conditions were applied at 0°, 20°, 40°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion: 8-N·m valgus torque, 5-N·m external rotation torque, 90-N anterior drawer, and combined 90-N anterior drawer plus 5-N·m tibial external rotation torque. Anterior translation, valgus rotation, and external rotation of the knee were measured for each state and loading condition using an optical motion capture system. Results: sMCL and dMCL transection resulted in increased laxity for all loading conditions at all flexion angles. Isolated dMCLR restored external rotation stability to intact levels throughout all degrees of flexion, yet valgus stability was restored only at 0° of flexion. Isolated sMCLR restored valgus and external rotation stability at 0°, 20°, and 40° of flexion but not at 60° or 90° of flexion. Single-strand SICR restored valgus and external rotation stability at all flexion angles. In the combined anterior drawer plus external rotation test, isolated dMCL and single-strand SICR restored stability to the intact level at all flexion angles, while the isolated sMCL restored stability at 20° and 40° of flexion but not at 60° or 90° of flexion. Conclusion: In the cadaveric model, single-strand SICR restored valgus and rotational stability throughout the range of motion. dMCLR restored rotational stability to the knee throughout the range of motion but did not restore valgus stability. Isolated sMCLR restored external rotation and valgus stability in early flexion. Clinical Relevance: In patients with anteromedial rotatory instability in the knee, neither an sMCLR nor a dMCLR is sufficient to restore stability.

Injuries of the medial side of the knee : When and how should they be treated?

Different medial structures are responsible for restraining valgus rotation, external rotation, and anteromedial rotation. When injured this can result in various degrees of isolated and combined instabilities. In contrast to earlier speculation, the posterior oblique ligament (POL) is no longer considered to be the main stabilizer of anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI). Acute proximal medial ruptures are typically managed conservatively with very good clinical results. Conversely, acute distal ruptures usually require a surgical intervention. Chronic instabilities mostly occur in combination with instabilities of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The clinical examination is a particularly important component in these cases to determine the indications for surgery for an additional medial reconstruction. In cases of severe medial and anteromedial instabilities, surgical treatment should be considered. Biomechanically, a combined medial and anteromedial reconstruction appears to be superior to other reconstruction methods; however, there is currently alack of clinical studies to confirm this biomechanical advantage.

A New Algorithm to Treat Chronic Combined ACL/MCL Injuries: Let's Come Back to the “Rotatory Instability Test”

Background: Chronic combined medial collateral ligament (MCL) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are frequent. Medial residual laxity is a risk factor for ACL rerupture. It should be treated at the same time as the ACL reconstruction (ACLR) if necessary, but there are still questions surrounding the indications for abstention or surgery of the medial plan, especially for grade 2 MCL injuries of the Fetto and Marshall classification. Indications: The purpose is to come back to a simple test, the “Rotatory Instability Test” as described by Slocum and Larson in 1968 for systematic clinical examination of the knee to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of the deep MCL (dMCL) and superficial MCL (sMCL) examination and to propose a decision-making algorithm for the treatment of the chronic combined ACL/MCL injuries based on the assessment of anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI). Technique Description: Examination of the ACL with Lachman test, anterior drawer in neutral rotation, and pivot shift test confirm the ACL injury. Valgus laxity is tested in extension and at 20° of flexion. Then, an anterior drawer test at 90° of flexion with external rotation is done (the anterior drawer in external rotation [ADER] test) allowing to identify isolated dMCL, dMCL + sMCL, or MCL + posterior oblique ligament (POL) injuries. Discussion: As persistent medial laxity is a risk factor for ACL graft failure and there is no reliable method of instrumented laxity assessment, careful clinical examination remains essential. Systematic examination of the medial side with valgus laxity testing at 0° and 20° flexion combined with the ADER test assessment of AMRI can guide treatment of the MCL injury component. Where there is no valgus laxity and the ADER test is negative, isolated ACLR is indicated. If there is significant medial laxity at 0°, this suggests combining sMCL and POL reconstruction with ACLR. Where the knee is stable at 0° but there is valgus laxity at 20° and a positive ADER test, the dMCL can be reconstructed using a gracilis graft or a combined sMCL and dMCL reconstruction can be added to the ACLR depending on the degree of laxity. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

The Anterior Fibers of the Superficial MCL and the ACL Restrain Anteromedial Rotatory Instability

Background: There is limited knowledge about how the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and capsuloligamentous structures on the medial side of the knee act to control anteromedial rotatory knee instability. Purpose: To investigate the contribution of the medial retinaculum, capsular structures (anteromedial capsule, deep medial collateral ligament [MCL], and posterior oblique ligament), and different fiber regions of the superficial MCL to restraining knee laxity, including anteromedial rotatory instability. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic testing system in a position-controlled mode. Loads of 10 N·m valgus rotation, 5 N·m tibial external rotation, 5 N·m tibial internal rotation, and 134 N anterior tibial translation in 5 N·m external rotation were applied at different flexion angles. The motion of the intact knee at 0° to 120° of flexion was replicated after sequential excision of the sartorial fascia; anteromedial retinaculum; anteromedial capsule; anterior, middle, and posterior fibers of the superficial MCL; the deep MCL; the posterior oblique ligament; and the ACL. The reduction in force/torque indicated the contribution of each resected structure to resisting laxity. A repeated-measures analysis of variance with a post hoc Bonferroni test was used to analyze the relative force and torque changes from the intact state. Results: The superficial MCL was the most important restraint to valgus rotation from 0° to 120° and provided the largest contribution to resisting external rotation between 30° and 120° of knee flexion, gradually increasing from 25.2% ± 7.4% at 30° to 36.9% ± 15.4% at 90°. The posterior oblique ligament contributed significantly to resisting valgus rotation only in extension (17.2% ± 12.1%) but was the major restraint to internal rotation at 0° (46.7% ± 13.1%) and 30° (30.4% ± 17.7%) of flexion. The sartorial fascia and anteromedial retinaculum resisted ER at all knee flexion angles (P < .05) and was the single most important restraint in the extended knee (19.5% ± 11%). The capsular structures (anteromedial capsule and deep MCL) had a combined contribution of 20% ± 11.5% at 0° and 23.4% ± 10.5% at 120° of knee flexion but were less important from 30° to 90°. The ACL was the primary restraint to anterior tibial translation in external rotation between 0° and 60° of flexion (50.2% ± 16.9% at 30°), but the superficial MCL was more important at 90° to 120° of knee flexion (36.8% ± 16.4% at 90°). The anterior, middle, and posterior regions of the superficial MCL contributed differently to the simulated laxity tests. The anterior fibers were the most important part of the superficial MCL in resisting external rotation and combined anterior tibial translation in external rotation. Conclusion: The superficial MCL not only was the primary restraint to valgus rotation throughout the range of knee flexion but also importantly contributed to resisting anterior tibial translation in external rotation, particularly in deeper flexion in the cadaveric model. The anterior fibers of the superficial MCL are the most important superficial MCL fibers in resisting anterior tibial translation in external rotation. This study suggests that a medial reconstruction that reproduces the function of the posterior MCL fibers and posterior oblique ligament may not best control anteromedial rotatory instability. Clinical Relevance: Based on these data, there is a need for an individualized medial reconstruction to address different types of medial injury patterns and instabilities.

Poster 297: Deep medial collateral ligament reconstruction of the knee restores rotational stability throughout full range of motion while contemporary MCL reconstruction only does in extension

Objectives: The past decade has taught the importance of identifying and treating the concomitant injuries that frequently occur at the time of ACL rupture. Failure to do so can result in increased stresses on the ACL graft and subsequently increased risk of failure. While the focus has largely been on the menisci and the anterolateral soft tissues, recent studies have highlighted high frequency at which injuries to the medial structures occur in previously presumed isolated ACL tears and the increased risk of poor outcomes when they are not addressed. Injuries to the medial ligament complex result in valgus and anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI). Historic MCL reconstruction techniques have focused on the superficial MCL in an effort to restore valgus stability while frequently ignoring the importance of the deep MCL in controlling tibial external rotation. The recent recognition of the importance of the medial ligament complex has led to multiple studies revisiting medial sided anatomy and questioning contemporary MCL reconstruction techniques. The objective of this study is to assess and compare the ability of a contemporary medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstruction and a deep MCL (dMCL) reconstruction to restore rotational and valgus stability to the knee. Methods: Six pairs fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens were included and with intact soft tissue, the distal femur and tibia were potted in PVC pipes to facilitate biomechanical testing using a customized multi-axial knee activity simulator. Four states were tested: 1) intact 2) after sectioning of the sMCL and dMCL, 3) contemporary MCL reconstruction as described by LaPrade et al, and 4) dMCL reconstruction. In each state, the knees were tested under four loading conditions at varying flexion angles (0°, 20°, 40°, 60° and 90°): 8 Nm valgus torque, 5 Nm tibial external rotation torque, 90N anterior drawer, and combined 90 N anterior drawer plus 5 Nm tibial external rotation torque. Results: Transection of the sMCL and dMCL resulted in increased laxity with the application of the valgus torque, external rotation torque, and combined anterior drawer plus external rotation at all flexion angles. dMCL reconstruction restored external rotation stability to intact levels (all p&lt;0.05) throughout all degrees of flexion (Figure 1), yet dMCL reconstruction did not restore valgus stability at any flexion angle (Figure 2). Contemporary MCL reconstruction restored valgus and external rotation stability at 0° and 20° and valgus stability at 40° (p&lt;0.01). In response to a combined anterior drawer plus tibial external rotation, the dMCL restored stability back to the intact level at 20° and improved stability between 40° and 90° flexion (Figures 3 and 4). In contrast, the contemporary MCL reconstruction did not restore stability at any degree of flexion (p&gt;0.05). Conclusions: Deep MCL reconstruction restored rotational stability to the knee throughout range of motion but did not restore valgus stability. The contemporary MCL reconstruction restore stability only near full extension.

Reconstruction of medial collateral ligament and posterior oblique ligament of the knee using anatomically routed semitendinosus transfer: a retrospective case series

Background: Double bundle reconstruction of superficial medial collateral (sMCL) and posterior oblique (POL) ligaments with a single femoral tunnel using distally based semitendinosus is a traditional procedure for management of medial knee ligament complex injuries. However, the transferred tendon was always routed in nonanatomical configuration. The author reports the clinical outcomes and complications in a reconstruction technique with anatomical graft routing method. Methods: Fourteen patients with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grade 3 or 4 valgus instability and anteromedial rotatory instability underwent reconstruction of sMCL and POL by anatomically routed semitendinosus tendon transfer. The average age of the patients was 36.6 yr. Medial-sided knee ligament injury was isolated in two patients and part of multiligament knee injury in 12 patients. The average duration between injury and surgery was 7 wk (range 2 to 25). Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at final follow-up. Results: After a median follow-up of 29.5 mo (range, 24 to 36), the mean Lysholm and IKDC subjective scores improved from 27 (2.95) and 46.8 (8.26) preoperatively to 87.6 (3.44) and 71.7 (3.68) at latest follow-up (P&lt;0.05), respectively. Nine patients (64.3%) returned at a preinjury Tegner score level at final follow-up. Both medial and posteromedial laxity were significantly improved on physical examination (P&lt;0.01). No patients had recurrent laxity of medial knee reconstruction or any concurrent cruciate ligament reconstructions. Conclusions: Reconstruction of sMCL and POL using anatomically routed semitendinosus transfer showed favorable clinical outcomes without recurrence of medial or anteromedial instability after midterm follow-up. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Medial Collateral Ligament and Posterior Oblique Ligament Reconstruction for Valgus Instability After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries are typically managed non-operatively, with high rates of clinical success. However, patients who present with medial knee laxity with valgus stress testing of a fully extended knee, anteromedial rotatory instability, associated tibial plateau fracture, or multiligament injury or those who continue to be symptomatic after non-operative treatment may benefit from surgical intervention. Patients with a history of total knee arthroplasty who suffer MCL and posterior oblique ligament (POL) injuries represent a challenging patient population and often require surgical attention. In this Technical Note, we describe the preoperative assessment, decision making, and surgical technique for anatomic reconstruction of the superficial MCL and POL with an Achilles allograft in young, active patients with medial-sided knee injuries after total knee arthroplasty.

The Control of Anteromedial Rotatory Instability Is Improved With Combined Flat sMCL and Anteromedial Reconstruction

Background: Both the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) and the deep MCL (dMCL) contribute to the restraint of anteromedial (AM) rotatory instability (AMRI). Previous studies have not investigated how MCL reconstructions control AMRI. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to establish the optimal medial reconstruction for restoring normal knee kinematics in an sMCL- and dMCL-deficient knee. It was hypothesized that AMRI would be better controlled with the addition of an anatomically shaped (flat) sMCL reconstruction and with the addition of an AM reconstruction replicating the function of the dMCL. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A 6 degrees of freedom robotic system equipped with a force-torque sensor was used to test 8 unpaired knees in the intact, sMCL/dMCL sectioned, and reconstructed states. Four different reconstructions were assessed. The sMCL was reconstructed with either a single-bundle (SB) or a flattened hamstring graft aimed at better replicating the appearance of the native ligament. These reconstructions were tested with and without an additional AM reconstruction. Simulated laxity tests were performed at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion: 10 N·m valgus rotation, 5 N·m internal and external rotation (ER), and an AM drawer test (combined 134-N anterior tibial drawer in 5 N·m ER). The primary outcome measures of this force-controlled setup were anterior tibial translation (ATT; in mm) and axial tibial rotation (in degrees). Results: Sectioning the sMCL/dMCL increased valgus rotation, ER, and ATT with the simulated AM draw test at all flexion angles. SB sMCL reconstruction was unable to restore ATT, valgus rotation, and ER at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion to the intact state (P < .05). Flat MCL reconstruction restored valgus rotation at all flexion angles to the intact state (P > .05). ER was restored at all angles except at 90°, but ATT laxity in response to the AM drawer persisted. Addition of an AM reconstruction improved control of ATT relative to the intact state at all flexion angles (P > .05). Combined flat MCL and AM reconstruction restored knee kinematics closest to the intact state. Conclusion: In a cadaveric model, AMRI resulting from an injured sMCL and dMCL complex could not be restored by an isolated SB sMCL reconstruction. A flat MCL reconstruction or an additional AM procedure, however, better restored medial knee stability. Clinical Relevance: In patients evaluated with a combined valgus and AM rotatory instability, a flat sMCL and an additional AM reconstruction may be superior to an isolated SB sMCL reconstruction.

A Biomechanical Comparison of the LaPrade Technique Versus a Novel Technique for Reconstruction of Medial-Sided Knee Injuries

Background: Medial-sided knee injuries can lead to symptomatic valgus laxity or anteromedial rotatory instability and may require surgery, particularly in the setting of cruciate tears and tibial-sided medial collateral ligament (MCL) avulsions. The LaPrade (LP) technique utilizes 2 free grafts to reconstruct the superficial MCL (sMCL) and the posterior oblique ligament (POL). An alternative MCL reconstruction devised by the senior author comprises an anatomic single-bundle reconstruction using a free graft to reconstruct the sMCL with advancement and imbrication of the posteromedial capsule/POL (MCL anatomic reconstruction with capsular imbrication [MARCI] technique). These techniques have not been biomechanically compared with one another. Purpose: To identify if one of these reconstruction techniques better restores valgus and rotational medial knee stability throughout the range of motion. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 20 fresh-frozen, male (mean age, 43.7 years [range, 20-63 years]), midfemur-to-toe-matched cadaveric knees were utilized. All reconstructions were performed by a single fellowship-trained sports medicine surgeon. Left and right specimens within matched pairs were randomized to 1 of the 2 treatment groups: LP or MARCI. Each specimen was tested in 3 phases: (1) intact knee, (2) destabilized (MCL and POL completely severed), and (3) reconstructed (post-LP or post-MARCI reconstruction). We quantified valgus angulation defined by medial joint line opening, as well as internal and external tibial rotation at 0°, 20°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion under applied external moments/torques at each phase. Results: There were significant differences between the MARCI and LP reconstruction groups in valgus stability compared with the intact state (P = .021), with the MARCI reconstruction more closely approximating the intact knee. There was no overall difference between the MARCI and LP reconstruction techniques for internal rotation (P = .163), with both closely resembling the intact state. For external rotation, the effect of the reconstruction technique was dependent on the knee flexion angle (P < .001). At the highest angles, there were no differences between reconstructions; however, for lower knee flexion angles, the MARCI technique more closely resembled the intact state. Conclusion: Although both techniques improved knee stability compared with destabilized conditions, the MARCI technique better approximated intact stability during valgus at knee flexion angles from 0° to 90° and external rotation loads at knee flexion angles ≤30° in a cadaveric model. Clinical Relevance: The MARCI technique provides an alternative option to improve valgus stability throughout the range of motion. It utilizes a POL advancement without the potential limitations seen in the LP technique, such as multiple tunnel complexity and collision, particularly in the multiple ligament–injured knee.

Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction for Anteromedial Instability of the Knee: A Biomechanical Study In Vitro

Background: Although a medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury is associated with anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI) and often with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, there has been little work to develop anteromedial (AM) reconstruction to address this laxity. Purpose: To measure the ability of a novel “anatomic” AM reconstruction technique to restore native knee laxity for isolated AM insufficiency and combined AM plus posteromedial insufficiency. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 12 cadaveric knees were mounted in a kinematic testing rig that allowed the tibia to be loaded while the knee flexed-extended 0° to 100° with 88-N anteroposterior translation, 5-N·m internal rotation–external rotation (ER), 8-N·m valgus, and combined anterior translation plus ER to simulate AMRI. Joint motion was measured using optical trackers with the knee intact, after superficial MCL (sMCL) and deep MCL (dMCL) transection, and after AM reconstruction of the sMCL and dMCL with semitendinosus autografts. The posteromedial capsule (PMC)/posterior oblique ligament (POL) was then transected to induce a grade 3 medial injury, and kinematic measurements were repeated afterward and again after removing the grafts. Laxity changes were examined using repeated-measures analysis of variance and post-testing. Results: sMCL and dMCL deficiency increased valgus, ER, and AMRI laxities. These laxities did not differ from native values after AM reconstruction. Additional PMC/POL deficiency did not increase these laxities significantly but did increase internal rotation laxity near knee extension; this was not controlled by AM reconstruction. Conclusion: AM reconstruction eliminated AMRI after transection of the dMCL and sMCL, and also eliminated AMRI after additional PMC/POL transection. Clinical Relevance: Many MCL injuries occur in combination with ACL injuries, causing AMRI. These injuries may rupture the AM capsule and dMCL. Unaddressed MCL deficiency leads to an increased ACL reconstruction failure rate. A dMCL construct oriented anterodistally across the medial joint line, along with an sMCL graft, can restore native knee ER laxity. PMC/POL lesions did not contribute to AMRI.

A Triple-Strand Anatomic Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Restores Knee Stability More Completely Than a Double-Strand Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study In Vitro

Background: There are many descriptions of medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstruction, but they may not reproduce the anatomic structures and there is little evidence of their biomechanical performance. Purpose: To investigate the ability of “anatomic” MCL reconstruction to restore native stability after grade III MCL plus posteromedial capsule/posterior oblique ligament injuries in vitro. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twelve cadaveric knees were mounted in a kinematic testing rig to impose tibial displacing loads while the knee was flexed-extended: 88-N anteroposterior translation, 5-N·m internal-external rotation, 8-N·m valgus-varus, and combined anterior translation plus external rotation (anteromedial rotatory instability). Joint motion was measured via optical trackers with the knee intact; after superficial MCL (sMCL), deep MCL (dMCL), and posterior oblique ligament transection; and then after MCL double- and triple-strand reconstructions. Double strands reproduced the sMCL and posterior oblique ligament and triple-strands the sMCL, dMCL, and posterior oblique ligament. The sMCL was placed 5 mm posterior to the epicondyle in the double-strand technique and at the epicondyle in the triple-strand technique. Kinematic changes were examined by repeated measures 2-way analysis of variance with posttesting. Results: Transection of the sMCL, dMCL, and posterior oblique ligament increased valgus rotation (5° mean) and external rotation (9° mean). The double-strand reconstruction controlled valgus in extension but allowed 5° excess valgus in flexion and did not restore external rotation (7° excess). The triple-strand reconstruction restored both external rotation and valgus throughout flexion. Conclusion: In a cadaveric model, a triple-strand reconstruction including a dMCL graft restored native external rotation, while a double-strand reconstruction without a dMCL graft did not. A reconstruction with the sMCL graft placed isometrically on the medial epicondyle restored valgus rotation across the arc of knee flexion, whereas a reconstruction with a more posteriorly placed sMCL graft slackened with knee flexion. Clinical Relevance: An MCL injury may rupture the anteromedial capsule and dMCL, causing anteromedial rotatory instability. Persistent MCL instability increases the likelihood of ACL graft failure after combined injury. A reconstruction with an anteromedial dMCL graft restored native external rotation, which may help to unload/protect an ACL graft. It is important to locate the sMCL graft isometrically at the femoral epicondyle to restore valgus across flexion.

Knee anteromedial compartment dissection: Final results and anterior oblique ligament description.

The anteromedial region of the knee is little explored in the literature and may play an important role in anteromedial rotatory instability. The purpose of this study is to describe a ligamentous structure in the anteromedial region of the knee identified in a series of anatomical dissections of cadaveric specimens. Twenty-one cadaveric knees were dissected to study the medial compartment. Exclusion criteria were signs of trauma, previous surgery, signs of osteoarthritis, and poor preservation state. The main structures of this region were identified during medial dissection. After releasing the superficial medial collateral ligamentof the tibia, the anterior oblique ligament (AOL)was isolated. The morphology of the structure and its relationship with known anatomical parameters were determined. For the statistical analysis, the means and standard deviations were calculated for continuous variables. A 95% confidence interval was defined as significant. Student's t-tests were used for continuous variables. After dissection, a distinct ligamentous structure (AOL) was found in the medial region of the knee. This structure was found in 100% of the cases, was located extracapsularly and originated in the anterior aspect of the medial epicondyle, running obliquely toward the tibia. When crossing the joint, the ligament presented a fan-shaped opening, exhibiting a larger area at the tibial insertion. The AOL had a mean thickness of 6.83 ± 1.51 mm at its femoral origin and 13.39 ± 2.64 at its tibial insertion. It had a significantly (p = 0.0001) longer mean length with the knee at 90° of flexion (35.27 ± 6.59 mm) than with the knee in total extension (27.89 ± 5.46 mm), indicating that the ligament is tensioned in flexion. A new structure was identified in the anteromedial compartment of the knee with a ligamentous appearance. Further studies are necessary to identify its importance on knee stability. This study demonstrates the anatomy of a new medial structure of the knee. As a result, there will be a better understanding of the stability of the knee.

Anteromedial Rotatory Laxity: What is it, When to Address, and How?

Recent biomechanical studies have clarified the role of the medial soft tissue stabilizers in restraining anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI) of the knee: the superficial medial collateral ligament has been shown to be an important passive restraint to AMRI, with a relevant contribution of the deep medial collateral ligament (dMCL) near full extension. Clinically, concomitant injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and dMCL or both dMCL and superficial medial collateral ligament, may lead to AMRI. Anterior drawer in external rotation, external rotation and valgus stress test are used to assess AMRI, although a feasible classification system has not yet been established. In cases of an acute ACL and high-grade MCL injury, it is still a matter of the debate whether both ligaments need to be addressed immediately or if a primary conservative treatment of the MCL should be followed by an ACL reconstruction. If not addressed adequately, chronic AMRI may arise and an increased rate of recurrent ACL insufficiency has to be assumed. In the setting of chronic AMRI, a combined ACL and MCL reconstruction with autologous tendon grafts should be considered. Nevertheless, indication for primary repair or reconstruction of the medial soft tissue stabilizers with autologous tendon grafts remains controversial and a lack of data exists regarding the potential of current treatment options for restoring AMRI.

Posterior oblique ligament of the knee: state of the art.

The posterior oblique ligament (POL) is the predominant ligamentous structure on the posterior medial corner of the knee joint. A thorough understanding of the anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of POL injuries will aid orthopaedic surgeons in the management of these injuries.The resulting rotational instability, in addition to valgus laxity, may not be tolerated by athletes participating in pivoting sports. The most common mechanism of injury – accounting for 72% of cases – is related to sports activity, particularly football, basketball and skiing. Moreover, three different injury patterns have been reported: those associated with injury to the capsular arm of the semimembranosus (SM), those involving a complete peripheral meniscal detachment and those involving disruption of the SM and peripheral meniscal detachment.The hallmark of an injury related to POL lesions is the presence of anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI), which is defined as ‘external rotation with anterior subluxation of the medial tibial plateau relative to the distal femur’.In acute settings, POL lesions can be easily identified using coronal and axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) where the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and POL appear as separate structures. However, MRI is not sensitive in chronic cases.Surgical treatment of the medial side leads to satisfactory clinical results in a multi-ligamentous reconstruction scenario, but it is known to be associated with secondary stiffness.In young patients with high functional demands, return to sports is allowed no earlier than 9–12 months after they have undergone a thorough rehabilitation programme.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:364-371. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200127