To compare the clinical outcomes of anterolateral femoral interregional flap with turbocharge technique and traditional anterolateral femoral flap in repair of limblarge wound surface. Clinical data of 38 patients withlimb large wound surface (11 cm×39 cm-16 cm× 65 cm) admitted to the Department of Prosthetics and Reconstruction of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from May 2018 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Eighteen patients were treated by anterolateral femoral perforator flap and superficial circumflex iliac artery flap (ALTP-SCIAP) with turbocharge technique (interregional flap group); while 20 patients were treated with unilateral or bilateral anterolateral femoral flaps, combined with skin grafting if necessary (traditional anterolateral femoral flap group). The survival of skin flap, repair of donor area, complications and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups. In interregional flap group, 18 flaps were harvested and transplanted, the flap width, length and the viable area were (9.9±2.0) cm, (44.2±3.5) cm and (343.2±79.9) cm2, respectively. In traditional anterolateral femoral flap group and 29 flaps were harvested and transplanted, the flap width, length and the viable area were (11.0-2.8) cm (21.7-3.2) cm and (186.4-49.2) cm2, respectively. There were significant differences in the flap length and survival area between the two groups (t=22.365 and 8.345, P<0.05), but not significant difference in the flap width (t=1.525, P>0.05). In the interregional flap group, the donor site of flap was closed by direct suture in 11 cases, by skin retractor assisted suture in 6 cases, and by skin grafting in 1 case. In traditional anterolateral femoral flap group, the donor site of flap was closed by direct suture in 12 flaps, by skin retractor assisted suture in 11 flaps, and by skin grafting in 6 flaps. No significant difference was found between the two groups (χ2=2.657, P>0.05). The interregional flap group had lower postoperative complications rate (5.6% vs. 35.0%, χ2=4.942, P<0.05) and higher patient satisfaction rate (94.4% vs. 70.0%, χ2=4.448, P<0.05) than traditional anterolateral femoral flap group. Compared with the traditional anterolateral thigh flap, the anterolateral femoral interregional flap with turbocharge technique has a larger flap area, less complications, and higher patient satisfaction rate. With sacrificing only one donor area and sharing a set of vascular pedicles, it can repair "super long", "super large" or irregular limb wound defects maximally. At the same time, most of the donor areas of the flap can be sutured directly without skin grafting.