Anterior Resection In Patients Research Articles

Identification of risk factors for postoperative complications after right colectomy and low anterior resection in patients ≥85 years old with colorectal cancer using the National Clinical Database

AbstractAimThe purpose of this study was to evaluate factors associated with surgical outcomes and postoperative complications (Grade ≥3 by Clavien–Dindo classification) of right hemicolectomy (RH) and low anterior resection (LAR) for colorectal cancer in patients ≥85 years old.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed National Clinical Database (NCD) data on patients aged ≥85 years who underwent RH and LAR for colorectal cancer between 2017 and 2020. All possible preoperative factors were used to explore the risk factors for serious postoperative complication in these very elderly patients with colorectal cancer.ResultsFor RH, the operative mortality rate was 1.1% (98 cases), and the rate of serious postoperative complications was 5.2% (480 cases). Similarly, the mortality rate was 1.1% (27 cases), and the rate of serious complications (Clavien–Dindo Grade ≥3) was 8.7% (206 cases) for LAR. Based on multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for serious postoperative complications were male sex, ADL (partially dependent), hypertension, platelets (<150 000/μL), serum Na (<138 mEq/L), and PT‐INR (>1.1) for RH, and ASA‐PS (Grade ≥3), history of pneumonia, creatinine (>1.2 mg/day), and serum Na (<138 mEq/L) for LAR.ConclusionsThe present results for RH and LAR suggest that surgical treatment for patients aged ≥85 years old is safe and feasible. Surgeons need to pay special attention more to physical status and past medical history than to tumor factors to prevent serious postoperative complications in these older patients with colorectal cancer.

SP5.8 - A survey of the actual incidence of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in our patients and its effect on their quality of life

Abstract Aim Following rectal surgery, bowel function is often affected and leads to a constellations of symptoms called Low Anterior Resection syndrome (LARS). Whilst several risk factors have been identified from previous studies, the most important question is how these symptoms impact the quality of life (QOL) of our patients. The aim of our study was to gain an overview of LARS among our patients, identify risk factors, quantify how it affects their daily lives and recommend preventive and management options. Method We contacted all patients who had undergone anterior resections 01/10/2020-01/10/2023 via a telephone consultation carried out by a single doctor. Using the LARS questionnaire which has been internationally validated, we quantified the severity of LARS symptoms and effects on QOL in our patients. Results A total 36 patients were included in the study. We found 75% patients had no LARS, 25% had minor LARS; no patients had major LARS. 15 patients experienced tenesmus, 11 urgency, 11 accidental leakage of stool, 10 inability to control flatus and 8 frequency. Only 8.33% reported their symptoms affecting their QOL; in this group, accidental leakage of stool was the common symptom. We found no correlation between the incidence of LARS and post-operative time period. None of our LARS patients had had pre-op radiotherapy; only 10% patients who had post- op chemo developed LARS. Conclusion In our cohort of Anterior resection patients, most had no LARS; none had major LARS. Though some patients had some symptoms, QOL was affected in only 8.33%. Those who had symptoms were directed to our LARS clinic in Lower GI physiology for further management.

Development and validation of an MRI and clinicopathological factors prediction model for low anterior resection syndrome in anterior resection of middle and low rectal cancer

ObjectiveTo validate the predictive power of newly developed magnetic resonance (MR) morphological and clinicopathological risk models in predicting low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) 6 months after anterior resection of middle and low rectal cancer (MLRC). MethodsFrom May 2018 to January 2021, 236 patients with MLRC admitted to two hospitals (internal and external validation) were included. MR images, clinicopathological data, and LARS scores (LARSS) were collected. Tumor morphology data included longitudinal involvement length, maximum tumor diameter, proportion of tumor to circumference of the intestinal wall, tumor mesorectal infiltration depth, circumferential margin status, and distance between the tumor and anal margins. Pelvic measurements included anorectal angle, mesenterial volume (MRV), and pelvic volume. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to obtain independent risk factors of LARS after anterior resection Then, the prediction model was constructed, expressed as a nomogram, and its internal and external validity was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. ResultsThe uni- and multivariate analysis revealed distance between the tumor and anal margins, MRV, pelvic volume, and body weight as significant independent risk factors for predicting LARS. From the nomogram, the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were 0.835, 75.0 %, and 80.4 %, respectively. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity in the external validation group were 0.874, 83.3 %, and 91.7 %, respectively. ConclusionThis study shows that MR imaging and clinicopathology presented by a nomogram can strongly predict LARSS, which can then individually predict LARS 6 months after anterior resection in patients with MLRC and facilitate clinical decision-making. Clinical relevance statementWe believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature. This method of predicting postoperative anorectal function by preoperative measurement of MRV provides a new tool for clinicians to study LARS.

Tissue morphometric measurements do not predict survival following colorectal cancer surgery

BackgroundEx vivo tissue morphometric (TM) measurements have been proposed as a quality marker for colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. However, their survival associations require clarification. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of capturing TM measurements based on ex vivo fresh specimen images and explore the association between these TM measurements and survival outcomes.MethodsA prospective cohort study at Concord Hospital, Sydney was conducted with Stage I to III CRC patients (2009–2019) who underwent an anterior resection (AR) or right hemicolectomy (RH). Using high-resolution digital photographs of fresh CRC specimens, ex vivo tissue morphometric (TM) measurements—resected mesentery area (TM A), distances from high vascular tie to tumour (TM B) and bowel wall (TM C), and bowel length (TM D)—were recorded using Image J. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) estimates and their associations to clinicopathological variables were investigated with Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. Linear regression models tested association between TM measurements and lymph node (LN) yield.ResultsOf the 1,425 patients who underwent CRC surgery, TM measurements were performed on 312 patients, with an average age of 69.4 years (SD 12.3), of whom 52.9% were male. The majority had an AR (57.8%). Among AR patients, a 5-year OS rate of 77.4% and a DFS rate of 70.1% were observed, with TM measurements bearing no relationship to survival outcomes. Similarly, RH patients exhibited a 5-year OS rate of 67.2% and a DFS rate of 63.1%, with TM measurements again showing no association with survival. Only TM D (P = 0.02) measurements were associated with the number of LNs examined.ConclusionThis study successfully demonstrates the feasibility of measuring TM measurements on photographs of ex vivo fresh specimens following CRC surgery. The lack of association with survival outcomes questions the utility of TM measurements as a quality metric of CRC surgery.

Safety of the stent-based diverting technique after low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer

<p>Given that anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication of low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer, ileostomy is the most common method for reducing the severity of AL, which in turn has stoma-related side effects. A self-developed technique named the stent-based diverting technique (SDT) not only protects the anastomosis but also avoids the stoma. From December 2021 to March 2023, 80 patients were randomized into the ileostomy arm (n = 43) or the SDT arm (n = 37). Demographic characteristics, laboratory test results, surgical outcomes, and oncological features were compared between the groups. For the primary endpoint, the incidence of severe complications was 14.0% in the ileostomy arm and 8.1% in the SDT arm (relative risk=0.58, 95% confidence interval=0.156-2.163, p=0.494). For the second endpoint, the incidences of mild and total complications were comparable. The shorter the hospital stay, the lower the cost and quality of life, which could be improved by the SDT procedure. This prospective randomized clinical trial preliminarily evaluated the usefulness of SDT after LAR for patients with rectal cancer, suggesting that SDT might be an alternative operation for patients who need to receive ileostomy after rectal surgery.</p>

Differences in quality of life of patients undergoing total pelvic exenteration compared with standard rectal cancer surgery: a scoping review.

Rectal cancer is often treated surgically with an anterior resection (AR) or abdominoperineal excision (APE). However, for patients with locally advanced disease or local recurrence total pelvic exenteration (TPE) surgery can be performed. The magnitude of surgery varies, and little research has been done to consider how quality of life (QoL) may vary according to the extent of surgery. A search was conducted on MEDLINE and PubMed for papers published from 2010 to 2021. Inclusion criteria consisted of observational studies comparing adult populations with rectal cancer undergoing APE, AR or TPE, reporting QoL using validated tools. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Outcomes of interest were global QoL, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (nausea and vomiting, diarrhoea, and constipation) and pain. Seven studies including 1402 patients were analysed. QoL following TPE generally improves over time, back to baseline or better. AR and APE groups have similar patterns of improvement between baseline and 12 months after surgery, although scores declined in some studies at 12 months. TPE scores are lower overall, and the pattern of improvement differs, with patients tending to have worse nausea and vomiting symptoms. AR and APE patients tend to experience more lower GI symptoms. It is not possible to draw firm conclusions based on the studies analysed. However, QoL returns to baseline following TPE, APE and AR. Preoperative QoL appears to be an indication of postoperative outcomes. Further observational studies are required.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on short-term outcomes after low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: Analysis of data from the Japanese National Clinical Database.

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected the allocation of various medical resources to several areas, including intensive care units (ICUs). However, currently, its impact on the short-term postoperative outcomes of gastrointestinal cancer surgeries remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on the incidence of complications occurring after low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer in Japan. Data from the Japanese National Clinical Database between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively examined. The primary outcome of the study was the postoperative morbidity and mortality rates before and after COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, the postoperative ICU admission rate was assessed. Morbidity and mortality rates were also assessed using a standardized morbidity/mortality ratio (SMR, the ratio of the actual number of incidences to the expected number of incidences calculated by the risk calculator). This study included 74 181 patients, including 43 663 (58.9%) from COVID-19 epidemic areas. The mean actual incidences of anastomotic leakage (AL) and pneumonia during the study period were 9.2% and 0.9%, respectively. The SMRs of these complications did not increase during the pandemic but those of AL declined gradually. The mean 30-day mortality and operative mortality rates were 0.3% and 0.5%, respectively. Moreover, SMRs did not change significantly in the pandemic or regional epidemic status. The ICU admission rate temporarily decreased, especially in the epidemic areas. Although the pandemic temporarily decreased the ICU admission rate, its impact on short-term outcomes following low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer was insignificant in Japan.

Transanal drainage tube for prevention of anastomotic leak after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of transanal drainage tube (TDT) in reducing the incidence of anastomotic leak following anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer. Methods: We conducted a systematic search for relevant studies published from inception to October 2022 across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software. The primary outcomes included total incidence of anastomotic leak, grade B and C anastomotic leak rates, reoperation rate, anastomotic bleeding rate, and overall complication rate. Results: Three randomized controlled trials involving 1115 patients (559 patients in the TDT group and 556 in the non-TDT group) were included. Meta-analysis showed that the total incidences of anastomotic leak and of grade B anastomotic leak were 5.5% (31/559) and 4.5% (25/559), respectively, in the TDT group and 7.9% (44/556) and 3.8% (21/556), respectively, in the non-TDT group. These differences are not statistically significant (P=0.120, P=0.560, respectively). Compared with the non-TDT group, the TDT group had a lower incidence of grade C anastomotic leak (1.6% [7/559] vs. 4.5% [25/556]) and reoperation rate (0.9% [5/559] vs. 4.3% [24/556]), but a higher incidence of anastomotic bleeding (8.2% [23/279] vs. 3.6% [10/276]). These differences were statistically significant (P=0.003, P=0.001, P=0.030, respectively). The overall complication rate was 26.5%(74/279) in the TDT group and 27.2% (75/276) in the non-TDT group. These differences are not statistically significant (P=0.860). Conclusions: TDT did not significantly reduce the total incidence of anastomotic leak but may have potential clinical benefits in preventing grade C anastomotic leak. Notably, placement of TDT may increase the anastomotic bleeding rate.

Close distal margin is associated with locoregional rectal cancer recurrence: A multicenter study.

The importance of the radial margin for rectal cancer resection is well understood. However, surgeons have deemphasized the distal margin, accepting very close distal margins to perform sphincter-preserving surgery. We hypothesized that distal margins < 1 cm would be an independent risk factor for locoregional recurrence. The objective was to determine whether close distal margins are associated with increased locoregional recurrence risk. This was a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study conducted at six academic medical centers including patients who received low anterior resection surgery for primary rectal cancer between 2007 and 2018. Of 556 low anterior resection patients, the rate of close distal margin was 12.8% (n = 71), and the locoregional recurrence rate was 5.0% (n = 28). The locoregional recurrence rate for close distal margin cases was 9.9% (n = 7) compared to 4.3% (n = 21) for distal margins ≥1.0 cm. In multivariable analysis, the only factor significantly associated with locoregional recurrence was close distal margin (adjusted odds ratio: 2.80, confidence interval: 1.08-7.25, p = 0.035). Rectal cancer patients with close distal margins (<1 cm) following low anterior resection had a significantly higher risk for locoregional recurrence. Therefore, the decision to perform low anterior resection with margins < 1 cm should be taken with caution.

Comparison of quality of life, symptom and functional outcomes following surgical treatment for colorectal neoplasia.

Colorectal surgical procedures can have a significant impact on quality-of-life (QoL), functional and symptom outcomes. This retrospective study conducted in a tertiary care center evaluated the influence of four colorectal surgical procedures on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). 512 patients undergoing colorectal neoplasia surgery between June 2015 and December 2017 were identified via the Cabrini Monash Colorectal Neoplasia database. Primary outcomes measured were the mean changes in PROMs following surgery utilizing the International Consortium of Health Outcome Measures colorectal cancer (CRC) PROMs. 242 patients from 483 eligible patients responded (50% participation rate). Responders and non-responders were comparable in median age (72 vs. 70 years), gender (48% vs. 52% male), time from surgery (<1 and >1 year), overall stage at diagnosis and type of surgery. Respondents underwent either a right hemicolectomy, ultra-low anterior resection, abdominoperineal resection or a transanal endoscopic microsurgery/transanal minimally invasive surgery. Right hemicolectomy patients reported the best post-operative function and reduced symptoms, significantly better (P < 0.01) than ultra-low anterior resection patients who reported the worst outcomes in multiple areas (body image, embarrassment, flatulence, diarrhoea, stool frequency). Furthermore, patients undergoing an abdominoperineal resection reported the worst scores for body image, urinary frequency, urinary incontinence, buttock pain, faecal incontinence and male impotence. The differences in PROMs in CRC surgical procedures is demonstrable. The worst post-operative functional and symptom scores were reported after either an ultra-low anterior resection or an abdominoperineal resection. Implementation of PROMs will identify and aid early patient referral to allied health and support services.

Gastrectomy reduces pancreatic secretory function via pancreatic atrophy

PurposeAlthough reports suggest that the pancreatic volume decreases after gastrectomy for gastric cancer, the relationship between the pancreatic volume and secretory function after gastrectomy remains unclear. In this study, we examined the relationship between the pancreatic volume and exocrine and endocrine functions after total gastrectomy.MethodsThe pancreatic volumes of 18 distal gastrectomy and 15 total gastrectomy patients were retrospectively measured using computed tomography volumetry up to 5 years postoperatively. Ten low anterior resection patients were selected as controls. In addition, the pancreatic volume and exocrine function evaluated by fecal elastase and the insulin secretory function evaluated by glucagon tolerance testing were prospectively examined before and one year after surgery in nine cases of total gastrectomy.ResultsAfter low anterior resection, the pancreatic volume did not change, but after distal and total gastrectomy, the pancreatic volume decreased continuously until the fifth year. After total gastrectomy, fecal elastase decreased significantly from 865.8 μg/g to 603.2 μg/g in the first year (p = 0.0316), and the insulin secretion capacity also decreased significantly from 3.83 ng/mL to 2.26 ng/mL (p = 0.0019).ConclusionsThe pancreatic volume decreases continuously after gastrectomy for gastric cancer, and the pancreatic exocrine and endocrine functions decrease along with pancreatic atrophy after total gastrectomy.

The role of transanal tube after low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A propensity score-matched study

BackgroundThe protective efficacy of transanal tube for anastomosis was compared with that of diverting stoma in patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. MethodsWe included consecutive patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery from January 2013 to December 2019. The patients were grouped into transanal tube or diverting stoma, according to the protection methods they received. Propensity score-matching with 1:1 ratio was done. The primary outcome was the incidence of anastomotic leakage. ResultsOf the 656 eligible patients, 207 (31.6%) and 385 (58.7%) patients were grouped into transanal tube and diverting stoma, respectively, and 64 (9.7%) patients who did not undergo either transanal tube or diverting stoma were excluded. After matching, the incidence of anastomotic leakage was 9.7% and 10.6% in diverting stoma and transanal tube, respectively (P = .871). The overall morbidity was 23.2% and 15.0% in diverting stoma and transanal tube, respectively (P = .045). In the multivariate analysis, tumor size >2.5 cm and level of anastomosis <4 cm were significant risk factors for anastomotic leakage. In a subgroup analysis for patients with the level of anastomosis >4 cm, the incidence of anastomotic leakage was not significantly different between the transanal tube and diverting stoma groups. However, for patients with a level of anastomosis <4 cm, the incidence of grade C anastomotic leakage was significantly greater in the transanal tube than in the diverting stoma group (2.5% vs 9.9%, P = .040). ConclusionThe protective efficacy of transanal tube may be comparable to diverting stoma, especially for those with a level of anastomosis >4 cm.

Are risk factors for anastomotic leakage influencing long-term oncological outcomes after low anterior resection of locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant therapy? A single-centre cohort study.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) poses the most serious problem following low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer independent of surgical approach or technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for the occurrence of AL and how they affect the oncological long-term outcome of patients who received neoadjuvant therapy. A single centre cohort study of 163 consecutive locally advanced rectal cancer patients (cT3, cT4, N +) that received neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection with primary anastomosis between January 1998 and December 2020 were included in this study. Short- and long-term findings were compared between patients with AL (Leakage +) and without AL (Leakage -). A complete follow-up was obtained from 163 patients; thereby, 33 patients (20%) developed an AL. We observed more patients with comorbidities (38% vs. 61%, p = 0.049) which developed a leakage in the course. Permanent stoma rate (36% vs. 18%, p = 0.03) was higher, and time between primary operation and stoma reversal was longer (219days [172-309] vs. 93days [50-182], p < 0.001) in this leakage group as well. Tumour distance lower than 6cm from the anal verge (OR: 2.81 [95%CI: 1.08-7.29], p = 0.04) and comorbidities (OR: 2.22 [95%CI: 1.01-4.90], p = 0.049) was evaluated to be independent risk factors for developing an AL after rectal cancer surgery. Oncological outcome was not influenced by AL nor by other associated risk factors. We could clearly detect the distance of tumour from the anal verge and comorbidities independent risk factors for the occurrence of AL. Oncological findings and long-term outcome were not influenced by these particular risk factors.

P56-3 Ileostomy closure within 6 months after anterior resection for patients with indication of adjuvant chemotherapy

Performing temporary ileostomy to protect a distal anastomosis is regarded as a manner for minimizing the risk of anastomotic leakage and lessening the rate of urgent reoperation. However, the optimal time of ileostomy closure remains controversial due to rare evidence and available data, especially for patients who require postoperative adjuvant therapy. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of performing ileostomy closure within 6 months after anterior resection for rectal cancer patients with indication of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Quality of Life after Rectal Cancer Resection Comparing Anterior Resection, Abdominoperineal Resection, and Complicated Cases

Introduction: Compared to abdominoperineal resection (APR), sphincter preservation using low anterior resection (AR) for rectal cancer (RC) implies the risk of impaired functional outcome and postoperative complications associated with a persistent or additionally required ostomy. The aim of our study was to compare quality of life (QoL) after AR and APR with a special separate analysis of AR patients with a stoma. Methods: QoL of 84 APR, 356 AR, and 29 AR patients with complications and an additional stoma, termed converted therapy (COT) patients, was compared with regard to groups and effect of radiotherapy (RT). All patients received rectal resection between 1998 and 2013, and 47% of the patients had RT. QoL was assessed using extended EORTC QLQ-C30 and -CR38 questionnaires. Results: Questionnaires from 57 APR, 165 AR, and 25 COT patients alive were evaluated after a median time of 4 years after surgery. Global health status was equally high in AR and APR patients (score: 67), whereas COT patients turned out with a significantly lower score of 50 (p = 0.007). Compared to APR and COT, AR patients revealed less symptoms and higher functionality, especially for physical, role, and social functioning (p < 0.001). The reduction of QoL instances was significant in the COT group and in all patients treated by RT. Conclusion: QoL after RC resection may be further improved by avoiding additionally required ostomy after AR but also RT by a better individual selection of qualified patients. Qualification parameters urgently need to be defined by prospective studies.

Pelvic floor peritoneum reconstruction is a protective factor for defecation dysfunction after laparoscopic anterior resection in patients with middle and low rectal cancer.

The pelvic cavity is a monolithic structure whose integrity plays an important role in the pelvic organ function. Currently, pelvic floor peritoneum reconstruction (PFPR) is rarely performed during laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer patients. This study evaluated the effect of PFPR using barbed wire during laparoscopic surgery on the postoperative defecation function in middle and low rectal cancer patients. This was a retrospective study involving a total of 252 middle and low rectal cancer patients who had been subjected to laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection of rectal cancer at Shanghai Changhai Hospital from March 2018 to April 2020. The Wexner and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores were used to evaluate the postoperative defecation function among patients. A Wexner score ≥ 8 and LARS score ≥ 30 were considered to indicate major defecation dysfunction. A total of 229 patients (52 patients subjected to PFPR) were followed up, and the Wexner and LARS scores were recorded. The follow-up rate was 90.87%, the mean follow-up time was 22.88 ± 6.93months, the stoma rate was 64.29%, the ileostomy reduction surgical rate was 90.74%, and the stoma duration was 7.64 ± 2.94months. Regarding the assessment of postoperative defecation dysfunction using the Wexner score, a multivariate analysis revealed that a long operation time (odds ratio [OR], 0.991; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.984-0.999, p = 0.026) and radiotherapy (OR, 0.352; 95% CI, 0.156-0.797, p = 0.012) were independent risk factors for major defecation dysfunction, while a high tumor location (OR, 1.318; 95% CI, 1.151-1.657, p = 0.001) and PFPR (OR, 4.770; 95% CI, 1.435-15.857, p = 0.011) were independent protective factors for major defecation dysfunction. Regarding the assessment of the postoperative defecation function using the LARS score, a multivariate analysis revealed that a high tumor location (OR, 1.293; 95% CI, 1.125-1.486, p < 0.001) and PFPR (OR, 3.010; 95% CI, 1.345-6.738, p = 0.007) were independent protective factors for major defecation dysfunction. A subgroup analysis showed that the postoperative Wexner score (3.13 ± 2.79 vs. 4.71 ± 3.45 p = 0.003) and LARS score (21.77 ± 8.62 vs. 25.14 ± 8.78 p = 0.015) were lower for patients with PFPR than for patients without PFPR. Regarding patients with low rectal cancer, those with PFPR had a lower LARS score than those without it (23.62 ± 8.94 vs. 28.40 ± 7.90, p = 0.022), but there was no significant difference in the Wexner score between the groups. A total of 9.76% of patients with PFPR and 48.89% of those without PFPR showed an intestinal accumulation in the sacral front (p < 0.001). PFPR and a high tumor location are protective factors for postoperative defecation dysfunction in middle and low rectal cancer patients. PFPR can be routinely performed during laparoscopic surgery.

2021 Canadian Surgery Forum: Virtual, online Sept. 21-24, 2021.

# 01. Design and validation of a unique endoscopy simulator using a commercial video game {#article-title-2} Procedural simulation has been shown to enhance early endoscopy training. In this proof of concept study, we aimed to show that a first-person shooter (FPS) video game with a novel in-house

Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan.

BackgroundRobot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has several advantages over conventional laparoscopy. However, population-based comparative studies for low anterior resection are limited. This article aimed to compare peri-operative results of robot-assisted low anterior resection (RALAR) and laparoscopyMethodsThis retrospective cohort study used data from patients treated with RALAR or conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection (CLLAR) between October 2018 and December 2019, as recorded in the Japanese National Clinical Database, a data set registering clinical information, perioperative outcomes, and mortality. Of note, the registry does not include information on the tumour location (centimetres from the anal verge) and diverting stoma creation. Perioperative outcomes, including rate of conversion to open surgery, were compared between RALAR and CLLAR groups. Confounding factors were adjusted for using propensity score matching.ResultsOf 21 415 patients treated during the study interval, 20 220 were reviewed. Two homogeneous groups of 2843 patients were created by propensity score matching. The conversion rate to open surgery was significantly lower in the RALAR group than in the CLLAR group (0.7 versus 2.0 per cent; P < 0.001). The RALAR group had a longer operating time (median: 352 versus 283 min; P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (15 versus 20 ml; P < 0.001), a lower in-hospital mortality rate (0.1 versus 0.5 per cent; P = 0.007), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (median: 13 versus 14 days; P < 0.001) compared with the CLLAR group. The CLLAR group had a lower rate of readmission within 30 days (2.4 versus 3.3 per cent; P = 0.045).ConclusionThese data highlight the reduced conversion rate, in-hospital mortality rate, intraoperative blood loss, and length of postoperative hospital stay for rectal cancer surgery in patients treated using robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with laparoscopic low anterior resection.

Ergonomic port placement in robotic colorectal surgery

AbstractAimThe aim of the study was to determine how spacing between ports and alignment of ports (oblique or vertical) influences manipulation angles in robotic colorectal surgery.MethodAbdominal CT scans of 10 consecutive robotic right hemicolectomy and 10 consecutive robotic high anterior resection patients were analysed. The manipulation angles were calculated using fixed points on the preoperative abdominal coronal CT scan. Port placements were marked on the CT scan. The fixed points used to measure the manipulation angles were from the most lateral part of the caecum, hepatic flexure, splenic flexure, the descending colon/sigmoid colon junction and the sigmoid colon/rectum junction.ResultsFor right hemicolectomy and high anterior resection surgery, a port spacing of 8 cm compared with 6 cm resulted in greater manipulation angles. With 6‐cm port spacing, wider manipulation angles were not achieved with vertical port alignment compared with oblique alignment except for dissection at the splenic flexure.ConclusionsThe greatest manipulation angles were achieved with the oblique 8‐cm port spacing, which should be used in most cases.

Better quality of life and reduced fecal incontinence in rectal cancer patients with the watch-and-wait follow-up strategy

IntroductionThe watch-and-wait (WW) strategy is an alternative to anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer (RC) that have had a complete clinical response to neoadjuvant treatment. Few reports describe the quality of life and functional anorectal disorders (FADs) in that population. AimTo analyze and compare the FADs and quality of life in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum treated with neoadjuvant therapy, divided into two different strategy groups: group 1 (G1), WW; and group 2 (G2), anterior resection. Materials and methodsThirty patients (G1: n = 20 and G2: n = 10) that had finished neoadjuvant therapy at least 12 months prior were included. Mean patient age was 59.5 years (range: 41-79) and 15 of the patients were men. The FADs were evaluated through: a) clinical history, b) 21-day bowel diary, c) Jorge and Wexner fecal incontinence scale, d) anorectal manometry (ARM), and fecal incontinence quality of life scale (FIQL). ResultsBowel diary: fecal incontinence (40%) and urge to defecate (45%) in G1 vs. fecal incontinence (60%) and urge to defecate (30%) in G2, with no significant differences (p = NS). Fecal incontinence scale: fecal incontinence in G1 was significantly less severe than that in G2 (median 6.5 points vs. 13 points [p = 0.0142]). ARM: no differences between the two groups. Quality of life: significantly different between the two groups (FIQL/G1: 3.7 vs. FIQL/G2: 2.8; p < 0.03). ConclusionsThe WW follow-up strategy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer was associated with better quality of life and reduced fecal incontinence.