Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures Research Articles

Risk factors for vascular injuries in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a single-institution retrospective study.

Vascular injuries in anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) occur due to the vascular manipulation needed to achieve optimal disc space exposure. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate intraoperative vascular injuries in patients undergoing single- and multilevel ALIF at a large tertiary academic center. Prospectively collected data specifically addressing postoperative complications in patients who underwent ALIF by neurosurgery spine faculty working with a specialized vascular surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic characteristics and intraoperative data were collected. Patients were split into vascular injury and non-vascular injury groups. Outcome comparisons were conducted using the chi-square exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for categorical and continuous data, respectively. Logistic regression was used to investigate associations with vascular injury, with univariate analysis first conducted to identify candidate associations. Based on these results, variables demonstrating a between-groups test statistic of p < 0.10 were included in the multivariate analysis to determine the independent predictors of vascular injuries. In total, 323 patients who underwent ALIF procedures were identified: 51% were male (n = 166) and 49% were female (n = 157). The mean age was 57.1 years, with 56% (n = 182) having undergone prior lumbar surgery. Vascular injuries were encountered intraoperatively in 7.1% (n = 23) of patients, and the majority (91% [n = 21]) involved the left common iliac vein. Patients with vascular injuries were statistically older (mean 63.6 vs 56.6 years), had greater incidence rates of coronary artery disease, opioid use, multilevel ALIF surgery involving the L2-3 level, and surgery involving multiple disc spaces, had more multilevel anterior instrumentation, and experienced greater blood loss during surgery and longer length of stay (all p < 0.05). Overall, there was 1 death (0.3%) secondary to aortic artery injury. Multivariate analysis identified opioid use, multilevel ALIF involving L2-3, and multiple interbodies as statistically independent predictors of vascular injury (all p < 0.05). Identifying patient risk factors can reduce the risk of vascular injuries in ALIF. Opioid use, multilevel ALIF involving L2-3, and multiple interbodies were independent predictors of vascular injuries in ALIF.

Primary anterior lumbar interbody fusion, with and without posterior instrumentation: a 1,377-patient cohort from a multicenter spine registry

BACKGROUND CONTEXTLumbar interbody instrumentation techniques are common and effective surgical options for a variety of lumbar degenerative pathologies. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has become a versatile and powerful means of decompression, stabilization, and reconstruction. As an anterior only technique, the integrity of the posterior muscle and ligaments remain intact. Adding posterior instrumentation to ALIF is common and may confer benefits in terms of higher fusion rate but could contribute to adjacent segment degeneration due to additional rigidity. Large clinical studies comparing stand-alone ALIF with and without posterior supplementary fixation (ALIF+PSF) are lacking. PURPOSETo compare rates of operative nonunion and adjacent segment disease (ASD) in ALIF with or without posterior instrumentation. STUDY DESIGNRetrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLEAdult patients (≥18 years old) who underwent primary ALIF for lumbar degenerative pathology between levels L4 to S1 over a 12-year period. Exclusion criteria included trauma, cancer, infection, supplemental decompression, noncontiguous fusions, prior lumbar fusions, and other interbody devices. OUTCOME MEASURESReoperation for nonunion and ASD compared between ALIF only and ALIF+PSF. METHODSReoperations were modeled as time-to-events where the follow-up time was defined as the difference between the primary ALIF procedure and the date of the outcome of interest. Crude cumulative reoperation probabilities were reported at 5-years follow-up. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate risk of operative nonunion and for ASD adjusting for patient characteristics. RESULTSThe study consisted of 1,377 cases; 307 ALIF only and 1070 ALIF+PSF. Mean follow-up time was 5.6 years. The 5-year crude nonunion incidence was 2.4% for ALIF only and 0.5% for ALIF+PSF; after adjustment for covariates, a lower operative nonunion risk was observed for ALIF+PSF (HR=0.22, 95% CI=0.06–0.76). Of the patients who are deemed potentially suitable for ALIF alone, one would need to add posterior instrumentation in 53 patients to prevent one case of operative nonunion at a 5-year follow-up (number needed to treat). Five-year operative ASD incidence was 4.3% for ALIF only and 6.2% for ALIF+PSF; with adjustments, no difference was observed between the cohorts (HR=0.96, 95% CI=0.54–1.71). CONCLUSIONSWhile the addition of posterior instrumentation in ALIFs is associated with lower risk of operative nonunion compared with ALIF alone, operative nonunion is rare in both techniques (<5%). Accordingly, surgeons should evaluate the added risks associated with the addition of posterior instrumentation and reserve the supplemental posterior fixation for patients that might be at higher risk for operative nonunion. Rates of operative ASD were not statistically higher with the addition of posterior instrumentation suggesting concern regarding future risk of ASD perhaps should not play a role in considering supplemental posterior instrumentation in ALIF.

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): a review of the procedure and associated complications

Degenerative disc disease and facet joint disease involving the lumbar spine are common in the aging population and are the most frequent causes of disability. Surgical interbody fusion of degenerative levels is the most common management technique. This is an effective treatment option to stabilize the spine and reduce mechanical pain and provides indirect decompression of the neural elements while restoring lordosis and correcting the deformity. Depending on the direction of the approach to the vertebral column, various techniques have been described. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) offers clear and wide visualization of the disc allowing the use of large interbody grafts, which provide a significant biomechanical advantage over other types of fusion. The transperitoneal approach is a much older technique and it is not commonly performed unless in isolated cases with extensive retroperitoneal scaring following multiple abdominal surgeries. The transperitoneal approach has been associated with higher rates of bowel injury, ileus, and retrograde ejaculation, and is limited at the L5–S1 segment, hence many spine surgeons favor a retroperitoneal approach. The major setback of ALIF is the need for great vessel mobilization. This manipulation of the vessels may lead to deep vein thrombosis and a direct vascular injury. This makes vascular anatomy studies in the preoperative stage invaluable in avoiding vascular injury. Other complications include possible injury to intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal organs, especially in patients with previous surgery and adhesions. Manipulation of the intestines causes postoperative ileus which lasts a few days. Sexual dysfunction in form of retrograde ejaculation is another complication seen in patients following ALIF and this has been attributed to injury to the superior hypogastric sympathetic nerves in the lower lumbar region.This article reviews the ALIF procedure i. e., transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches, and the associated intraoperative, early, and late complications.

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block as Part of a Multimodal Analgesic Regimen in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Opioids are a mainstay for pain control in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery but are associated with a high risk of dependence and significant adverse effects. Efforts continue to be made to utilize non-narcotic agents such as regional nerve block for pain control as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen. Recently, transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks have proven beneficial for patients undergoing lumbar fusion procedures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of TAP blocks for postoperative pain control and the effect on opioid consumption and hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). A retrospective review of patients undergoing elective ALIF included collection of data on demographics, LOS, pain scores using visual analog scale (VAS), opioid consumption using morphine milligram equivalents (MME) from postoperative day (POD) 0 to 5, and any complications. Patients who underwent primary ALIF or ALIF with concomitant posterolateral lumbar fusion were included. A total of 99 patients met inclusion criteria; 47 had a preoperative TAP block and 52 did not. Demographic data and number of levels fused were equally distributed between the groups. The TAP group had significantly lower MME consumption postoperatively during POD 0 to 2 and 0 to 5. VAS pain scores were lower for TAP block patients on POD 3 and 4; otherwise, there was no significant difference. LOS and complication rates were not significantly different. A multiple regression analysis found male sex to be a predictor of increased postoperative MME, while age and TAP block were significant predictors of decreased MME. The use of TAP block for patients undergoing ALIF was associated with less cumulative MME consumption in the immediate postoperative period. TAP block may be an effective tool for reducing postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing ALIF. The data in this study provide clinical relevance supporting the use of TAP blocks for patients undergoing ALIF procedures.

Predictive Factors of Intraoperative and Early Postoperative Outcome Measures After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions Based on American Society of Anesthesiologists Score

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a surgical treatment that requires a close operative plane to the great vessels, which increases the risk of perioperative complications. To our knowledge, no previous study has investigated the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System as a predictive factor for unfavorable perioperative outcomes in ALIF procedures. We aimed to analyze the ASA score as a predictive factor of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing ALIFs. A retrospective chart review was completed at each center to identify a consecutive set of patients who underwent an ALIF. Univariate and multivariate analyses between patients with preoperative ASA scores of ≤2 and >2 were performed to identify predictive factors that may contribute to adverse intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes. Among 210 patients identified, 59 (28.1%) had an ASA score >2 and 151 (71.9%) had an ASA score ≤2. On multivariate analysis, an ASA score >2 was predictive of increased 90-day reoperations (P= 0.02), estimated blood loss (EBL) (P= 0.02), and operative time (P= 0.02). Previous lumbar surgery was predictive of increased length of stay (P= 0.005), EBL (P < 0.001), 90-day readmission (P= 0.02), and operative time (P < 0.001). Posterior supplemental fixation was predictive of increased length of stay (P= 0.04). Increased number of operative levels was predictive of increased EBL (P < 0.001) and operative time (P < 0.001). Perioperative anticoagulation use was predictive of increased EBL (P < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Increased ASA scores were associated with unfavorable outcomes after ALIF and also can be used as a predictive tool for the risk of reoperations.

P42. Similar readmission and complications with minimally invasive versus open anterior and lateral lumbar interbody fusion, a national study

P42. Similar readmission and complications with minimally invasive versus open anterior and lateral lumbar interbody fusion, a national study

212. ALIF as a salvage procedure for TLIF pseudarthrosis: a clinical outcome study

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Lumbar fusion procedures are at risk for pseudarthrosis as a complication. Despite its relative prevalence, few studies have characterized the clinical efficacy of salvage procedures. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> To characterize clinical outcomes following anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) as a salvage procedure for pseudarthrosis of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Retrospective. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> Thirty-four ALIF patients. <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> VAS back and leg, ODI, SF-12 PCS, VR-12 PCS. <h3>METHODS</h3> A retrospective review of a surgical database of eligible procedures between November 2010 and June 2020 was performed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: single-level revision ALIF procedures performed at the index level for pseudarthrosis of TLIF. Patients were excluded if procedures were primary or performed for infectious, malignant or traumatic etiologies. Demographic and perioperative characteristics were collected. Additionally, time to revision, rates of 1-year arthrodesis, 6-month pseudarthrosis and postoperative complications were calculated. Radiographic measurements were performed to evaluate sagittal alignment and disc height at the preoperative, immediate postoperative and final postoperative timepoint. Differences between preoperative and final postoperative radiographic measurements were evaluated using a Student's t-test. Visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-Item Short Form physical composite score (SF-12 PCS and VR-12 PCS) were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. Overall achievement of a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated using the following established values: 1.2 (VAS Back), 1.6 (VAS leg), 12.8 (ODI), 4.0 (SF-12 PCS). <h3>RESULTS</h3> A total of 34 patients who underwent an ALIF revision procedure at the index level were identified. Mean age was 46.7 years with 81.1% being male and 64.9% obese (body mass index: 30 kg/m²). A total of 83.8% had an ASA < 2 and 75.5% carried a CCI > 1. Mean time from index TLIF to salvage ALIF procedure was 21.3 months. Mean operative time was 135.3 minutes with an average blood loss of 75.0mL and hospital length of stay of 49.5 hours. The majority of procedures were performed at the L5-S1 level (73.5%). Patients demonstrated a one-year arthrodesis rate of 100.0% with 2/34 patients requiring an additional revision procedure at the index level for neuroforaminal bone growth. A total of six postoperative complications were observed with one patient suffering from a mild urinary tract infection, one with acute renal failure, one with a venous thromboembolism, one with altered mental status, and two with fever of unknown origin. Following ALIF salvage, there was a significant increase in segmental lordosis, mean anterior and posterior disc height, as well as average disc height (p≤0.037, all). Mean preoperative outcome scores were 7.2 ± 1.9 for VAS back, 6.8 ± 2.8 for VAS leg, 56.7 ± 16.5 for ODI, and 28.1 ± 10.9 for SF-12 PCS. Clinically relevant improvement of PROMs as measured by MCID achievement rates by one-year were 67.1% for VAS back, 57.1% for VAS leg, 40.0% for ODI and 37.5% for SF-12 PCS. <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> Use of ALIF as a salvage procedure at either the L4-5 or L5-S1 level for TLIF pseudoarthrosis demonstrated a high arthrodesis rate at one-year. Patients demonstrated high rates of MCID achievement for back and leg pain, as well as ODI. These results support the use of ALIF as a salvage procedure for failed TLIFs at the L4-5 and L5-S1 levels. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Comparing Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis with Predominant Back Pain versus Predominant Leg Pain Symptoms

To compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement following anterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis in patients presenting with predominant back pain versus predominant leg pain symptoms. A single-surgeon database was reviewed for anterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures for isthmic spondylolisthesis. Patient demographics, perioperative characteristics, postoperative complications, and PROMs were collected. Demographic/perioperative characteristics were compared among groups using χ2 and Student t tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Mean PROM scores were compared using an unpaired Student t test. Postoperative improvement from preoperative baseline within each cohort was assessed with paired-samples t test. MCID achievement rates were compared with χ2 analysis. In total, 143 patients were included with 65 patients in the predominant back pain and 78 patients in the predominant leg pain cohort. Preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) leg was noted to be significantly greater in predominant leg pain cohort (P < 0.001). Cohorts demonstrated significant mean postoperative differences for the following PROMs at the following postoperative time points: significant differences were noted between cohorts for rate of achievement of MCID for the following PROMs at the following time points: VAS back at 2 years and VAS leg at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/overall (P < 0.036, all). Compared with patients presenting for surgery with predominant leg pain symptoms, patients undergoing lumbar fusion at L4-L5 and L5-S1 for isthmic spondylolisthesis with predominant back pain symptoms may demonstrate improved long-term clinical outcomes for reported back pain, leg pain, and disability and reduced postoperative length of stay and narcotic consumption.

Bone Morphogenetic Protein in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions: A Propensity-Matched Medicare Outcome Analysis.

Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) is a costly agent commonly used in spine surgery. Its effectiveness and complication profile have never been studied in a large, propensity-matched population following its approval by the Food and Drug Administration for use in single-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) surgeries. To investigate the rate of symptomatic pseudarthrosis or need for revision surgery after single-level stand-alone ALIFs with and without the use of BMP. Medicare Standard Analytic files derived from Medicare parts A and B were used to identify adult patients who underwent single-level ALIF procedures with and without use of BMP between 2004 and 2014. Patients were propensity matched based on their age, gender, and history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2, smoking, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoporosis. Sensitivity analysis using adjusted multivariate logistic regression models was also performed. The primary outcomes were the rates of symptomatic pseudarthrosis or need for revision surgery. The propensity-matched population analyzed in this study contained 22,380 patients undergoing single-level ALIF (8971 [40.6%] with BMP and 13,139 [59.4%] without BMP). Both patient groups were balanced at baseline. The rate of symptomatic pseudarthrosis in the propensity-matched analysis was higher in the BMP group (1.9% vs 1.4%, P < 0.05). BMP use during single-level ALIFs was associated with 44% increased odds of developing pseudarthrosis (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.16-1.76). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of revision surgery between groups (3.7% vs 3.5%, P = 0.49). BMP use in single-level ALIFs may be associated with increased risk of symptomatic pseudarthrosis. Large prospective pragmatic trials are needed to corroborate our findings.

Spinal exposure for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the lateral decubitus position: anatomical and technical considerations.

Single position surgery has demonstrated to reduce hospital length of stay, operative times, blood loss, postoperative pain, ileus, and complications. ALIF and LLIF surgeries offer advantages of placing large interbody devices under direct compression and can be performed by a minimally invasive approach in the lateral position. Furthermore, simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior column is possible in the lateral position without the need for patient repositioning. The purpose of this study is to outline the anatomical and technical considerations for performing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the lateral decubitus position. Surgical technique and technical considerations for reconstruction of the anterior column in the lateral position by ALIF at the L4-5 and L5-S1 levels. Topics outlined in this review include: Operating room layout and patient positioning; surgical anatomy and approach; vessel mobilization and retractor placement for L4-5 and L5-S1 lateral ALIF exposure, in addition to comparative technique of disc space preparation, trialing and implant placement compared to the supine ALIF procedure. Anterior exposure performed in the lateral decubitus position allows safe-, minimally invasive access and implant placement in ALIF. The approach requires less peritoneal and vessel retraction than in a supine position, in addition to allowing simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior columns when performing 360° Anterior-Posterior fusion.

Obesity: An Independent Risk Factor for Complications in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion? A Systematic Review.

Study DesignSystematic Review and Meta-analysisObjectivesRaised patient BMI is recognised as a relative contraindication to posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) due to the anaesthetic challenges, difficult positioning and increased intraoperative and postoperative complications, with the relative risk rising in patients with a BMI >25 kg/m2. The impact of obesity defined as a BMI > 30 kg/m2 on Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) outcomes is not yet established. The aim of this review was to evaluate if the presence of a raised BMI in patients undergoing ALIF procedures was an independent risk factor for intra- and postoperative complications.MethodsA systematic review of search databases PubMed; Google Scholar and OVID Medline was made to identify studies related to complications in patients with increased body mass index during anterior lumbar interbody fusion. PRISMA guidelines were utilised for this review. Complication rates in raised BMI patient cohort was compared to normal BMI complication rates with meta-analysis where available.Results315 articles returned with search criteria applied. Six articles were included for review, with 2190 patients included for analysis. Vascular complications in obese vs. non-obese patients undergoing the anterior approach demonstrate no significant difference in complication rates (P = .62; CI = −.03–.02). Obesity is found to result in an increased rate of overall complications (P = .002; CI = .04–.16).ConclusionsObesity was demonstrated to have an impact on overall complication rates in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion procedures, with postoperative complications including wound infections and lower fusion rates more common in patients in increased BMIs. Increased focus on patient positioning and reporting of outcomes in this patient cohort is warranted to further evaluate perioperative complications.

Content Quality and Audience Engagement Analysis of Online Videos for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

For the majority of patients, the Internet constitutes the first source of health information influencing their medical decision-making. We aimed to assess the quality of the online videos regarding anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). YouTube database was searched using 3 different phrases: "anterior lumbar interbody fusion", "ALIF", and "ALIF surgery". The first 50 videos for each phrase were selected. Video content was evaluated by 3 independent researchers using the DISCERN instrument. Qualitative data, quantitative data, and the source of upload were analyzed. A total of 24 videos were included. The mean DISCERN score was 38.21, indicating the poor quality of ALIF videos on YouTube. Video duration was positively correlated with DISCERN score (r= 0.71, P < 0.001) but not with the video power index (VPI). A negative correlation between time since upload and DISCERN score (r= -0.8 P < 0.001) was found. Furthermore, videos containing surgical complications, risk factors, and postoperative prognosis had a significantly higher DISCERN score. Neither DISCERN score nor a VPI correlated with the presence of intraoperative recordings. Videos including the explanation of the spine anatomy had a significantly higher number of likes (P= 0.018). Despite the increasing educational value of ALIF videos over time, the overall quality of YouTube videos on ALIF remains poor. However, the majority of videos can be recommended to the patient as an informative source of basic knowledge on the surgical details of the ALIF procedure. Longer video duration increases its quality without simultaneous negative influence on its popularity.

Minimally Invasive Robotic Lumbar Facet Decortication.

Minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) are placed through muscle sparing paramedian incisions and provide rigid 3 column fixation to promote stability and fusion. Percutaneous pedicle instrumentation is generally performed as adjunctive posterior stabilization after anterior lumbar interbody fusion or lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures. In these instances, arthrodesis is often achieved through the interbody fusion rather than posterior column fusion. In some cases, the surgeon may choose to perform posterior facet fusion in addition to PPS and anterior interbody. The addition of a minimally invasive facet fusion to PPS and anterior column interbody fusion creates more fusion surface and enables a truly circumferential fusion. While robotic-guided facet decortication has been suggested, there are currently no published techniques. Here, we describe a novel minimally invasive technique to perform percutaneous robotic facet decortication in conjunction with PPS following anterior lumbar interbody fusion or lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

1044 Impact of Obesity on Complications from Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Abstract Aim Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion is a procedure growing in popularity for conditions including degenerative disc disease, and discogenic back pain. Obesity is a significant risk factor in the development of back pain, with patients with raised BMIs at increased of complications using the posterior approach. This review aims to evaluate the risk profile of this patient cohort using the anterior approach for lumbar interbody fusion. Method A systematic review of the search databases Pubmed; google scholar; and OVID Medline was carried out between September 2020-November 2020. Studies evaluating the risks associated with obesity during Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) were identified and included for review according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies eligible for inclusion were agreed by two independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was used to compare intra- and postoperative complications in patients with increased BMI during ALIF. Results Search terms yielded 435 articles for evaluation. 13 studies were included in this review after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of studies demonstrated a significantly increased risk profile for overall complications in the obese patient cohort (CI = 0.04-0.16, p = 0.002) with significant heterogeneity (I2=86%). Patients with increased BMI were not significantly more likely to develop Vascular complications (CI= -.03-0.02, p = 0.62). Simple pooling demonstrated significant association between increased BMI and blood loss. Conclusions Obesity was demonstrated to have an impact on overall complication rates in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion procedures, with postoperative complications including wound infections and lower fusion rates more common in patients in increased BMIs.

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: single institutional review of complications and associated variables

As more patients undergo anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedures and more devices are created for that purpose, it is important to understand the complications that can arise and the variables that mitigate risk for major and minor complications. To assess complication rates after ALIF with or without posterior instrumentation and variables associated with increased likelihood of postoperative complications. We aim to provide this data as benchmarking to improve patient safety and surgical care. A single-center retrospective cohort study. All adult patients who underwent ALIF between 2017 and 2019 was performed OUTCOME MEASURES: Post-operative major and minor complications were evaluated. Complications were recorded and presented as percentages. Patient demographics, perioperative, and postoperative data were also collected and analyzed between patients who had no complications and those that had any complication. Subgroup analysis of surgical complications were performed by nonparametric Chi-square tests. Continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Ninty-five of three hundred sixty-two (26.2%) of patients experienced a minor or major complication. Among the most common complications found were surgical site infections (5.8%), neurological complications (4.1%), vascular complications (3.6%), and urinary tract infections (3.3%). Patients undergoing ALIF alone with post-operative complications had higher mean age, higher BMI, higher ASA status, and experienced higher estimated blood loss. Patients undergoing ALIF and posterior instrumentation with post-operative complications were more likely to have diabetes and had a higher ASA status. Patients with any complications from both groups had longer length of stay, discharge to a non-home setting and were more likely to be readmitted or return to the operating room. Our study reveals variables associated with complications at our institution, including age of the patient, BMI, and ASA status leading to higher complications and greater LOS, higher readmission rates, and disposition to skilled facilities.

Outpatient Versus Inpatient Anterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Multisite, Comparative Analysis of Patient Safety Measures.

The frequency and complexity of spinal surgery performed in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) is increasing. However, safety and efficacy data of most spinal procedures adapted to the ASC are sparse and have focused on anterior cervical surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the 90-day complication and readmission rates of anterior lumbar spine surgery performed in an ASC or inpatient setting. We performed a retrospective comparative analysis of 226 consecutive anterior lumbar surgeries (283 levels treated) completed in an ASC (n = 124) or in an inpatient tertiary care hospital (n = 102) over a 3-year period. These included anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), artificial disc replacement (ADR), and hybrids. Patients undergoing simultaneous or staged posterior procedures within 3 months were excluded. Patient demographics and surgical parameters between the two surgical settings were compared. Ninety-day medical complications and readmission rates were assessed. One-way analysis of variance and Chi-square analysis were used. A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant. The two study groups had similar baseline characteristics. While there was a trend toward fewer complications, reoperations, and readmissions for the ASC cohort, the differences were not statistically significant. There were 7 intraoperative complications (5.6% minor vascular injury) in the inpatient cohort and 0 in the ASC cohort. The overall 90-day postoperative complication rate was 5.6% for the inpatient cohort and 0.9% for the ASC cohort. The 90-day readmission rate was 1.9% in the ASC cohort and 1.6% in the inpatient cohort. The 90-day reoperation rate was 0.8% for the inpatient cohort and 0% in the ASC cohort. The average hospital stay was 2.3 ± 1.5 days for the inpatient cohort. The 90-day readmission rates were lower for outpatients than for inpatients, while the complication and reoperation rates were similar. Our results demonstrate that anterior lumbar procedures, including single-level and multilevel ALIF, ADR, and hybrid procedures, can be performed safely in an ASC. This has significant cost savings implications for the ASC setting.

Morbidity and clinicoradiological outcomes of anterior lumbar arthrodesis using tantalum intervertebral implants

PurposeThe objective of this study was to assess the morbidity of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) using an intervertebral tantalum implant. Tantulum is an extremely porous metallic material which possesses properties of osseointegration, osteoinduction and osteoconduction while offering superior primary stability, compared to other materials more commonly used (polyether ether ketone or PEEK, titanium). Perioperative morbidity, short-term functional outcomes (2 years) and radiographic impaction of implants were also analysed. MethodsThis retrospective monocentric study involved 94 patients operated on between 2014 and 2017 for degenerative disc disease (75%), degenerative spondylolisthesis (3%) or isthmic lytic spondylolisthesis (22%). Sixty-five patients (69%) had isolated (“stand-alone”) ALIF procedures, 24 (26%) with associated anterior osteosynthesis and 5 (5%) with associated posterior osteosynthesis. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve was established with surgical revision listed as the main criterion for failure. Perioperative complications were identified. The clinical evaluation at the last follow-up used a Visual Analogue Scale for radicular pain (VAS-R), for lumbar pain (VAS-L) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. The impactions, assessed on x-rays, were divided into 2 groups according to severity in order to establish risk factors (RF). ResultsThe primary objective showed a 2-year survival rate of 94% (95% CI [0.88; 0.99]). Two patients had early surgical revision for impaction and 4 patients had late surgical revision for pseudarthrosis. The rate of perioperative complications was 8.5%, mostly due to vascular causes. At the average follow-up of 33 months (24–59), the clinical results were significantly improved and the impaction rate was 36% in the immediate postoperative period (IPO) and 47% at one year. ConclusionALIF using an intervertebral tantalum implant is a reliable, reproducible and low morbidity technique. However, it is accompanied by a significant rate of immediate and secondary impaction but without any resounding influence on short-term clinical outcomes. Level of evidenceIV.

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) L5-S1 with overpowering of posterior lumbosacral instrumentation and fusion mass: a reliable solution in revision spine surgery.

In cases of spine surgical revisions of patients affected by sagittal malalignment, the restoration of the ideal lumbar lordosis (LL) is mandatory. ALIF procedures represent a powerful and effective approach to improve the LL in case of hypolordosis. This study evaluates the feasibility of ALIF to overpower posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion mass in revision spine surgery and secondarily to estimate complications, clinical and radiological outcomes. This is a single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on the use of ALIF overpowering in cases of lumbosacral instrumentation and/or fusion.Demographic, comorbidity, corrective strategy adopted, surgical data, clinical and radiological results, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Twelve patients (3 male; 9 female) underwent overpowering ALIF L5-S1 were included in the study with a mean FU of 34.0 ± 13.4 months. In 10 cases, a posterior titanium instrumentation and fusion mass were present; in 2 patients, only a fusion mass was present. Indicators of pain and disability improved in all patients (p < 0.01). Sagittal realignment with the restoration of ideal spinopelvic parameters was obtained in all cases. One peritoneal lesion requiring intraoperative suture without sequelae, two cases of postoperative radiculopathy, and one posterior wound infection requiring surgical debridement and antibiotic therapy were reported. Anterior implant of lordotic and hyperlordotic cages with increasing segmental lordosis is possible in the presence of posterior instrumentation and/or solid fusion mass. The biomechanical strength of this corrective technique can overcome posterior instrumentation and bone fusion resistance, therefore allowing a single-staged surgery for sagittal realignment.

Applied anatomy and surgical technique of the lateral single-position L5-S1 fusion.

The latest development in the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedure is its application in the lateral position to allow for simultaneous posterior percutaneous screw placement. The technical details of the lateral ALIF technique have not yet been described. To describe the surgical anatomy relevant to the lateral ALIF approach we performed a comprehensive anatomical study. In addition, the preoperative imaging, patient positioning, planning of the skin incision, positioning of the C-arm, surgical approach, and surgical technique are discussed in detail. The technique described led to the successful use of the lateral ALIF technique in our clinical cases. No lateral ALIF procedure needed to be aborted during these cases. Our present work gives detailed anatomical background and technical details for the lateral ALIF approach. This teaching article can provide readers with sufficient technical and anatomical knowledge to assist them in performing their first lateral ALIF procedure.

The Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Proposed Thromboprophylactic Regime

To determine the safety and efficacy of the proposed venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis regime in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) surgery. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are recognized complications after spine surgery, with rates in the literature ranging from 0% to 14% with some form of prophylaxis. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis can cause postoperative bleeding and hematomas, which can result in significant neural compromise or permanent injury, and wound complications. ALIF surgery involves the handling and compression of major abdominal vessels during surgery and this adds to the risk of both arterial thrombosis and VTE. A retrospective review of data, which were prospectively collected to evaluate the incidence of VTE in 200 consecutive patients undergoing ALIF following our VTE prophylaxis protocol. All patients had low molecular weight heparin, tinzaparin 4500 units subcutaneously on the evening before surgery, then daily for 3 to 5 days, then aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) 150 mg daily plus lansoprazole 30 mg daily for 4 weeks after surgery. All patients had intermittent pneumatic compression of their calves and thighs intraoperatively and for 24 hours postoperatively then had early mobilization and thromboembolic deterrent stockings for 6 weeks. There was no incidence of any symptomatic VTE in the any of the 200 patients and no loss to follow-up. There was a 0% incidence of injury to the iliac vessels, symptomatic arterial occlusion, wound hematoma, major intraoperative bleeding, need for transfusion, symptomatic GI bleed, or retroperitoneal hematoma requiring intervention. The proposed VTE prophylactic regime is safe and efficacious and may decrease the incidence of symptomatic VTE in patients undergoing an ALIF procedure, and despite the use of chemical thromboprophylaxis, there is no evidence of bleeding complications as a result of using this regime. 4.