Incidence Of Anterior Knee Pain Research Articles

A Prospective Comparative Study of the Functional Outcomes of Patellar Resurfacing Versus Non-resurfacing in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background and objective Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly successful surgical procedure. However, there is a lack of consensus about whether to resurface the patella or not. This study was aimed at evaluating the outcome of patellar resurfacing in terms of a decrease in the incidence of anterior knee pain after TKA and assessing whether patellar resurfacing is beneficial in improving functional outcomes. Materials and methods This prospective comparative study included 100 patients undergoing TKA who were randomly allotted to the patellar resurfacing or non-resurfacing group. Functional evaluation was done based on the Knee Society Score, and the pain was evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) preoperatively and after one year. Results There was a significant improvement in the Knee Society scores as well as the pain scores in both groups postoperatively. The patellar resurfacing group showed statistically significant improvement as compared to the non-resurfacing group in the Knee Society clinical and functional scores as well as the VAS at the end of one year. Conclusion Patellar resurfacing during TKA provides better clinical and functional outcomes as well as more relief from anterior knee pain as compared to non-resurfacing of the patella.

Semi-extended extra-synovial (SEES) tibial intramedullary nailing technique: Up to 10 year retrospective analysis of outcomes and anterior knee pain rates

BackgroundTibial intramedullary nailing is a common method of fixation for fractures of the tibia, with several approaches described. Anterior knee pain is a common complication following nailing, but the reported incidence of knee pain varies in the literature between 10 % and 86 %. There is considerable variation in incidence between nailing techniques, with an exact aetiology still unknown. We investigated the reported incidence of anterior knee pain in patients undergoing tibial nailing using the semi-extended extra synovial (SEES) technique at a Major Trauma Centre (MTC) in the UK. MethodsA retrospective review of tibial fractures treated with the SEES technique between December 2012 to February 2021. Data collected included patient demographics, mechanism of injury, fracture characteristics, length of stay, union rates and re-operation rates. Primary outcomes were anterior knee pain rates and patient reported outcome measures (PROM), the Kujala Score. Secondary outcomes were rates of union and complications. Results55 fractures were identified in 53 patients. Male: Female ratio was 32:21. The average age was 45.5 years. 96 % were unilateral fractures; with 53 % being right-sided. 21(38 %) fractures were open. Prior to definitive nailing 21 fractures had temporary stabilisation with an external fixator (Ex-Fix) ± wound debridement whilst the rest received plaster backslab immobilisation. 13 of the open fractures required soft tissue cover. 75 % of patients had initial surgery (SEES Nailing/Ex-Fix) within 4 days. There was a 91 % union rate with a median time to full radiographic union of 14 months. One post-operative complication of wound dehiscence was recorded. The mean follow-up time was 13.6 months. 15 % of patients reported anterior knee pain in the postoperative follow-up period. The average Kujala PROM score was 85 (Range: 52–100) Conclusion/findingsThe SEES technique had favourable PROM scores and displayed a lower incidence of anterior knee pain than the traditional infrapatellar approach. Knee pain rates were comparable to suprapatellar approaches without violating the knee joint. DisclosuresNone.

1310 Association of Anterior Knee Pain in Suprapatellar vs Infrapatellar Tibial Nailing Techniques. a Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract Aim To assess whether there is a statistically significant difference between the incidence of anterior knee pain in supra-patellar vs infra-patellar tibial nailing techniques. Method Data were collected from a single major trauma Centre in the UK and included all patients with tibial fractures who underwent fixation using IM nail. Out of 312 patients identified, 206 were included in the final data set who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Patients were divided into two cohorts: “Suprapatellar Nailing” and “Infrapatellar Nailing”, and clinical follow-up records were looked at thoroughly to identify the incidence of anterior knee pain. Statistical analysis was performed to test the null hypothesis, i.e., “Documented anterior knee pain is higher in infrapatellar nailing vs suprapatellar nailing”. Results Of 206 patients, 140 were males, and 66 were females, with a mean age of 43 years (Range 16-91). 60.2% (n = 124) were treated with infrapatellar nailing compared to suprapatellar nailing 39.8% (n = 82). Anterior knee pain was reported in 14.2% (n = 17) of the infrapatellar cohort compared to 14.6% (n = 12) in the suprapatellar cohort. The Chi-square statistic with yates’ correction is 0.0124, with a p-value of 0.91. The result is not significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions The mean incidence of anterior knee pain in both cohorts is 14.4 % on the literature's lower spectrum of reported results. We acknowledge that the sample size needed to attain statistical significance is enormous; our study results suggest no significant difference in the incidence of anterior knee pain in infrapatellar vs suprapatellar nailing techniques and can give uncertain outcomes in well-trained hands.

Frequency of interior knee joint pain after interlocking intermedullary nailing for fracture tibia shaft

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE:Tibial shaft fracture treatment with intermedullary nailing is very common these days. In the current study, our objective was to determine the percentage of patients with anterior knee pain following tibial shaft fracture treatment with interlocking intermedullary nailing.
 METHODOLOGY:Our research design was a Descriptive cross-sectional study. The study duration was approximately one year (03-3-2020 to 3-3-2021). The study was conducted at the orthopedics department of CMH Muzafarrabad. A sample of 125 participants was calculated. All patients underwent interlocking intermedullary nailing. We analyzed data using SPSS version 24. p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant for result authenticity.
 RESULTS:In the present study 125 patients were included.Mean age of patients was 42.4±8.6SD years.Among all the patients, 82(65.6%) reported no pain while 43(34.4%) reported pain. Visual analogue scale showed mean pain scores 3.22±2.5SD and lysholm scores were 80.74±3.28SD (p≤0.000 and p≤0.000, respectively).
 CONCLUSION:Tibial shaft fractures are common these days. A relatively high incidence of anterior knee pain following intermedually nailing after tibial shaft fracture was found in our study.

Incidence of Anterior Knee Pain and Functional Difficulty in a Prospectively Recruited Cohort Following Total Knee Arthroplasty With Selective Patellar Resurfacing

BackgroundThe influence of patellar resurfacing on anterior knee pain, stair climbing, and functional activity outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are incompletely understood. This study examined the influence of patellar resurfacing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) relating to anterior knee pain and function. MethodsThe Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score of Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR.) patient PROMs were collected preoperatively and at 12 months follow-up for 950 TKAs performed over 5 years. Indications for patellar resurfacing included Grade IV patello-femoral (PFJ) changes or mechanical PFJ findings during patellar trialing. Patellar resurfacing was performed on 393 (41%) of the 950 TKAs performed. Multivariable binomial logistic regressions were performed, using KOOS, JR. questions assessing pain during stair climbing, standing upright, and function during rising from sitting as surrogates for anterior knee pain. Independent regression models were performed for each of the targeted KOOS, JR. questions, with adjustment for age at surgery, sex, and baseline pain and function. ResultsNo association was observed between 12-month postoperative anterior knee pain or function with patellar resurfacing (P = .17, .97). Patients who had moderate or greater preoperative pain on stairs had an increased likelihood of postoperative pain and functional difficulty (odds ratio 2.3, P = .013), while males were 42% less likely to report postoperative anterior knee pain (odds ratio 0.58, P = .002). ConclusionSelective patellar resurfacing based on PFJ degeneration and mechanical PFJ symptoms produces similar improvement in PROMs for resurfaced and unresurfaced knees.

Patella non-resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty provides good functional results-a retrospective review of nine thousand three hundred forty six knees.

Patellar resurfacing has long been a contentious subject in TKA with no consensus and the literature yielding disparate results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term functional outcomes and complications of patients undergoing primary TKA without patellar resurfacing (non-resurfacing). This study retrospectively analysed 9346 patients who underwent primary manual jig-based TKA without patellar resurfacing at a single high-volume arthroplasty centre between 2010 and 2018. Patients with a minimum threeyear follow-up irrespective of disease etiology and implant manufacturer were included in the study. Primary outcome was measured using Oxford knee score and patellofemoral Feller score. Secondary outcomes included determining the incidence of patellofemoral complications and re-operation rates following TKA. A total of 8695 knees were eligible for final evaluation having a mean follow-up of 6.6 years. Mean age of the patients was 62.6 (SD-7.5) years with female predominance of (N-6619, 70.8%). The majority of the patients had primary OA (N-8792, 94.1%) with varus deformity (N-8642, 92.46%). Depuy was the most used manufacturer (n = 2592, 26.4%) with the posterior stabilised (N-4127, 44.2%) design being the most predominant. The mean Feller score of the study population was 24.5 (SD = 3) with a majority of patients having good to excellent outcomes (86.95%, N-8424) and mean Oxford knee score was 36.9 (SD-6.9) with a majority of the patients having an OKS greater than 30 (87.1%, N-8133) with anterior knee pain (AKP) reported in only 4.8% patients (N-418). Most common complications included patellar clunk (N-56, 0.7%), traumatic patellar fractures (N-62, 0.8%), quadriceps tendon tear (N-54, 0.7%) and patellar dislocation (N-4, 0.05%) CONCLUSION: Patellar non-resurfacing has no detrimental impact on functional outcomes and incidence of AKP. We conclude that it is a safe, cost-effective and satisfactory approach in primary TKA with no significant complications.

Intramedullary nail versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for displaced extraarticular proximal tibia fractures: a prospective comparative cohort study.

The treatment of extraarticular proximal tibial fractures is challenging. As the optimal fixation technique is still debated, the purpose of this study was to compare minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation. A prospective matched comparative studywas conducted on patients with displaced extraarticular proximal tibia fractures treated with MIPO (n = 29) versus IMN (n = 30) fixation. Outcomes collected were the Johner-Wruhs grading, range of motion (ROM), union rate, time to union, malunion, coronal and sagittal alignment, and post-operative complications. Union rates were similar between the MIPO and IMN groups (93% vs. 97%, P = 1.0). The IMN group had an earlier time to union (15 vs. 18weeks, P < 0.001) and superior functional outcomes at one year (effective Johner-Wruhs score: 80% vs. 55%, P = 0.04). There was a significantly higher incidence of anterior knee pain in the IMN group (23% vs. 0%, P = 0.02) and there was a trend for more infections in the MIPO group (21% vs. 13%, P = 0.73). IMN fixation of extraarticular proximal tibia fractures was associated with a shorter union time and better functional scores compared to MIPO.

Significantly Worse Fixation of Cemented Patellar Components on Multiacquisition Variable-Resonance Image Combination Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Femoral and Tibial Components: A Cause for Concern?

BackgroundThe etiology of anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unclear. Few studies have examined patellar fixation quality. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the patellar cement-bone interface after TKA on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to correlate the patella fixation grade with the incidence of anterior knee pain. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 279 knees undergoing metal artifact reduction MRI for either anterior or generalized knee pain at least 6 months after cemented, posterior-stabilized TKA with patellar resurfacing with one implant manufacturer. MRI cement-bone interfaces and percent-integration of the patella, femur, and tibia were assessed by a fellowship-trained senior musculoskeletal radiologist. The grade and character of the patella interface were compared to the femur and tibia. Regression analyses were used to determine the association between patella integration with anterior knee pain. ResultsThere were more patellar components with ≥75% zones of fibrous tissue (50%) compared to the femur (18%) or tibia (5%) (P < .001). There were a greater number of patellar implants with poor cement integration (18%) compared to the femur (1%) or tibia (1%) (P < .001). MRI findings showed more evidence of patellar component loosening (8%) compared to the femur (1%) or tibia (1%) (P < .001). Anterior knee pain was correlated with worse patella cement integration (P = .01), with women predicted to have better integration (P < .001). ConclusionThe quality of the patellar cement-bone interface after TKA is worse compared to the femoral or tibial component interface. Poor patellar cement-bone interface may be a source of anterior knee pain after TKA, but further investigation is required.

What can we expect from patellar denervation in knee arthroplasty? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Denervation by electrocauterization was proposed to be efficient in preventing anterior knee pain (AKP) following arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of patellar denervation (PD) in primary knee arthroplasty. Systematic search was performed in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalKey databases until July 2022 for published articles. The quantitative analyses were carried out by Review Manager 5.4 software. Twenty-one studies were included. Overall incidence of AKP, visual analog scale (VAS), and knee society score were significantly superior in PD group. Denervation also showed better outcomes in incidence of AKP at each follow-up time point, and in VAS and range of motion (ROM) at ≤3 months. Subanalyses based on depth of electrocautery showed statistically better results with 2–3 mm depth in VAS and PS compared to ≤1 mm. This study concluded that PD might contribute to lower incidence of knee pain. Patients who expect quicker recovery in pain and ROM may benefit from this procedure.

553 Does Patella Implant Design Affect Outcomes? Patella Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Aim To investigate whether implant design affect (1)incidence of anterior knee pain, (2)patient reported outcomes and (3)reintervention rates in a resurfaced vs non-resurfaced Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Method MEDline, pubmed and google scholar studies were evaluated using SIGN assessment tool and data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.2 on only randomised controlled trials. Search terms: arthroplasty, replacement, knee (Mesh), TKA, prosthesis, patella, patellar resurfacing, patellar retaining. Results 33 randomised controlled studies were identified. A total of 11 used the modern “patella-friendly” implants and 22 used the older “patella non-friendly” implants. There was no significant difference in anterior knee pain rates for either surgical option. When using patella-friendly implant, patella resurfacing results in a statistically higher clinical (P 0.007, MD -0.77) and functional (P &amp;lt; 0.0001, MD -1.87) KSS than the non-resurfaced counterparts, but scores were not clinically significant. When the patella was not resurfaced, there was a significant increased risk of reoperation with “non-patella friendly” implant (p=0.04, OR 1.42, CI 1.01, 2.00), whilst there was no significant difference between reoperation rates for the “patella friendly” implants (OR 1.17, CI 0.59,2.30). Conclusions Patella implant design has been shown to significantly improve KSS scores but with no clinical significance. Risk of further procedures was significantly higher in non-resurfaced patella TKAs with “non-friendly” implants, likely due to increased rates of anterior knee pain in these older generation implants leading to secondary resurfacing. However, when utilising “patella-friendly” implants, resurfacing does not lower reintervention rates. This meta-analysis finds no clinical indication to resurface the patellar whilst performing a TKA.

Does Degeneration of the Patellofemoral Joint After Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Affect Clinical Outcomes?

Background: Although biomechanical and clinical studies have reported adverse effects on the patellofemoral joint after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO), there is a paucity of literature that describes outcomes longer than midterm follow-up. Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the mid- to long-term radiologic and clinical outcomes of the patellofemoral joint after MOWHTO and to assess whether radiologic deterioration of the patellofemoral joint affected clinical outcomes or survivorship after MOWHTO. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 170 knees that underwent MOWHTO and had a minimum 5-year follow-up. In radiologic evaluation, serial postoperative changes in the patellofemoral joint compared with the preoperative status were evaluated on the Merchant view according to the Kellgren-Lawrence grade. The American Knee Society (AKS) score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Kujala score, incidence of anterior knee pain, and survivorship were used to assess clinical outcomes. Using radiologic assessment of the patellofemoral joint, we divided the patients into a radiologic progression group and a radiologic nonprogression group to evaluate whether radiologic progression of patellofemoral arthritis affected long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship after MOWHTO. Results: The mean follow-up period was 96.3 months (range, 60-163 months). Arthritic progression of the patellofemoral joint on the Merchant view was observed in 44.9%, 56.3%, 66.0%, and 84.0% of the cases at 5, 7, 9, and 11 years, respectively. Clinical outcomes such as AKS scores and KOOS significantly improved after MOWHTO (P < .001) at the latest follow-up. The incidence of anterior knee pain was 5.3% (9/170 knees). One knee (0.6%) underwent conversion to TKA due to progressive medial osteoarthritis, so the survival rate was 99.4% at a mean follow-up of 96.3 months. Despite patellofemoral degeneration over time, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes or survivorship between patients with and without radiologic progression at the latest follow-up. Conclusion: Although degeneration of the patellofemoral joint was observed with time after MOWHTO, the related symptoms were minimal and arthritic changes in the patellofemoral joint did not affect the clinical outcomes or survivorship after MOWHTO over a mid- to long-term follow-up.

Investigating and defining outcomes of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial

BackgroundAnterior knee pain is often reported following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. The aetiology remains unclear, but the surgical approach may play an important role. To date, no biomechanically validated method exists to assess patient outcomes specific to anterior knee pain in this cohort. The central aims of this study are to (1) evaluate the feasibility of a full-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the influence of surgical approach on intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures (suprapatellar versus infrapatellar nailing), (2) explore differences in clinical outcomes between the approaches, and (3) explore the development of a biomechanically validated methodology for assessing post-operative anterior knee pain and knee function specific to intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures.MethodsThis pilot study will follow a prospective randomised controlled design at the Royal Adelaide Hospital and The Queen Elizabeth Hospital (South Australia). This study aims to recruit 60 patients between 18 and 60 years old who will be randomly assigned to either the suprapatellar or infrapatellar approach following a decision for intramedullary surgical fixation by the treating surgeon. All nails in this study will be Stryker T2 Alpha nails. Patients will undergo standard radiograph, magnetic resonance imaging, and clinical assessments in-line with their standard operative care, and complete a number of patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures. Performance-based outcome measures will be assessed utilising three-dimensional motion capture techniques. Follow-up time points are 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Feasibility outcomes include ability to meet enrolment and retention metrics, compliance with all questionnaires and assessment procedures, and the occurrence of any adverse events. The primary clinical outcome is the incidence of anterior knee pain at 12 months after surgery.DiscussionThis study will establish the feasibility and inform the design of a large-scale RCT. Evaluation of all clinical data and patient outcomes will lead to the development of a new tool for assessing patient outcomes in this cohort. Limitations of the study include an unpredictable enrolment rate and loss to follow-up, small sample size, and the unknown ability of three-dimensional motion analysis to pick up the effects of anterior knee pain after tibial nailing.Trial registrationThis trial was prospectively registered on the 7 February 2020 on ANZCTR, ACTRN12620000109909.

Lateral Patellar Facetectomy Reduces the Incidence of Anterior Knee Pain in Patellar Resurfaced Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Lateral patellar facet impingement (LPFI) can cause anterior knee pain (AKP) after patellar resurfaced total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Recently, lateral patellar facetectomy (LPF), which has been used for LPFI, has been performed during primary TKA, providing good clinical outcomes. However, the effect of LPF on AKP in primary patellar resurfaced TKA has not been sufficiently studied. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of LPF on the development of AKP in patellar resurfaced TKAs with minimum follow-up of 3 years. This retrospective cohort study included 84 knees of 66 consecutive patients who underwent patellar resurfaced TKA between April 2007 and November 2014 in our hospital. The subjects were divided into two groups: TKA with LPF (LPF group; 47 knees) and TKA without LPF (no-LPF group; 37 knees). Postoperative AKP, the primary outcome, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and range of motion were investigated at the final visit and compared between the two groups. Six knees (16.2%) had AKP in the no-LPF group, whereas none of the knees had AKP in the LPF group at the final visit. The incidence of AKP was significantly lower in the LPF group (p = 0.004). The postoperative JOA score and flexion angle were significantly higher in the LPF group than in the no-LPF group. LPF correlated with less incidence of postoperative AKP and improved the JOA score and knee flexion angle. In patellar resurfaced TKA, LPF may be considered an additional maneuver to avoid postoperative AKP.

Effect of patella resurfacing on functional outcome and revision rate in primary total knee arthroplasty (Review).

Anterior knee pain, as well as patellofemoral disorders, after total knee arthroplasty are important reasons for revision in total knee arthroplasty. Current prosthesis designs include patellar components for patella replacement, and together with improved rational design of the prosthesis and advancement in knee alignment these appear to reduce the incidence of anterior knee pain following total knee replacement, even if the etiology of anterior knee pain remains unclear. However, new complications related to patella resurfacing emerge with this approach. At present, there are three strategies involving patella replacement in total knee arthroplasty: There are surgeons who always replace the patella, others who never resurface the patella and a third group of surgeons who usually do not resurface the patella but replace the patella in particular situations. There are arguments to support each of these viewpoints regarding patella resurfacing but no strong arguments to favor any of them. Finally, the decision to resurface the patella or not should be based on the practice, training and experience of individual surgeons. The aim of this review was to analyze the results of different strategies for patella resurfacing in terms of functional outcome and revision rate following primary total knee arthroplasty.

Anterior knee pain in runners after a half-marathon race

BackgroundAnterior knee pain has been associated with sports activity, especially long-distance running and endurance sports. It is important to determine the incidence of anterior knee pain (AKP) in runners after a half-marathon race and identify possible risk factors associated. MethodsCross-sectional study where runners from a half marathon race were randomly invited to participate. Participants were recruited at the race kit pickup site the day before the race. Eligible participants completed a survey regarding demographic information, running experience and training details. An orthopedic surgeon performed a physical examination and recorded the medical history. At the finish line, the participants were evaluated again for possible new injuries. ResultsA total of 205 runners were included in the study, with a 98.5% follow-up rate (n = 203). 24% of runners had an injury at the end of the race (n = 49). Anterior knee pain was the most frequent injury (n = 12), followed by iliotibial band syndrome (n = 10), muscle cramps (n = 7) and hamstring tears (n = 4). Anterior knee pain had a statistically significant association with insufficient stretching of the hamstrings (p = 0.048) and finishing the race in more than 2 h (p = 0.014). ConclusionsAnterior knee pain was the most frequent new injury in the half-marathon runners after the competition. Spending more than 2 h to finish the race and stretching the hamstrings by less than 70° in the supine position were risk factors for anterior knee pain.

Effect of femoral component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty by using 3D-printed patient-specific instruments: a prospective randomized control study

Objective: To compare the difference between two total knee arthroplasty (TKA) techniques, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and conventional instrumentation (CI), regarding the rotational alignment of femoral components. Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial in 80 patients with severe knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary unilateral TKA from October 2018 to December 2019 in Peking University Third Hospital was carried out. There were 63 females and 17 males, with an average age of 69 years. The patients were assigned to either PSI-TKA group (n=40) or CI-TKA group (n=40) with bluster random method (block size 4). The femoral component rotation on the transepicondylar axis, the outlier rate of rotational alignment, the rate of anterior knee pain, and the clinical outcomes including HSS and WOMAC score at 1-year follow-up were documented and analyzed. Results: Although no significant difference in femoral component rotational alignment was found between the two groups (CI-TKA: 0.7°, PSI-TKA: 0.6°, P=0.279), the PSI-TKA group achieved less coefficient of variation of rotational alignment (1.50 vs 2.14) and the distributions of the outliers (19.4% vs 7.9%, P=0.185). Six patients (8.1%) experienced anterior knee pain at 1-year follow-up. No significant difference regarding the incidence of anterior knee pain, the HSS, and WOMAC score was found between the two groups one year after the operation (all P>0.05). Conclusions: The satisfied postoperative rotational alignment of femoral components can be attained with the application of PSI in comparison with conventional instrumentation. In addition, PSI offers a potential benefit in the reduction of alignment outliers.

Surgical management of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadruple hamstring graft and assessment of its fuctional outcome

The knee joint is one of the most commonly injured joint in our body and the most commonly injured ligament is ACL. Due to ever increasing RTA’s and increased participation in sporting activities. There is increase in incidence of ligament injuries of knee. The ACL along with other ligaments, capsule is the primary stabilizer of knee and prevent anterior translation and restricts valgus and rotational stress to certain degree. Open reconstruction of ACL which was done earlier is not practiced now a day due to complications such as increased Post-operative pain, stiffness and lengthy rehabilitation phase. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the injured ACL has become the gold standard procedure. The ideal graft for ACL is still a topic of debate. The most commonly used graft are bone patellar tendon bone graft and hamstring graft. The hamstring graft is increasingly used now a day for the following reasons: . Advanced soft tissue fixation technique . Increased incidence of anterior knee pain with bone patellar tendon bone graft This study has been done to evaluate the functional outcome of arthroscopic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring tendon (Gracilis and semitendinosus) autograft in anterior cruciate injuries.Methods: Twenty cases of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were regularly followed for an average period of 17.6 months in mamta medical college, Khammam from august 2019 to march 2021. Results: Among twenty patients treated with arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction 45% (9 patients) had excellent functional outcome while 40% (8 patients) had good functional outcome and remaining 15% (3 patients) had fair outcome according to LYSHOLM KNEE SCORE. One patient had superficial infection at the donor site which settled with intravenous antibiotics. One patient developed deep infection of the donor site with wound gaping which is managed with wound debridement and secondary closure and was given intravenous antibiotics which is healed well and the sutures removed after 10 days. One patient developed fixed flexion deformity of 10 degree with range of movements ranging from 10 to 90 degree. The patient had poor compliance to rehabilitation protocol. The mean pre-operative IKDC (international knee documentation 2000 score) score was 50.86 while the mean post-operative score was 87.66. there was significant improvement in post-operative IKDC score compared with pre-operative score with P value

Patient-specific instrumentation combined with a new tool for gap balancing is useful in total knee replacement: a 3-year follow-up of a retrospective study

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine whether the gap-balancing technique with patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and a new balancing device in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can improve knee function to a greater extent than can the measured resection technique.Materials and methodsData from 150 patients who underwent TKA from August 2014 to June 2016 were studied retrospectively. The gap-balancing technique assisted by PSI and the new balancing device was used in 80 patients (82 knees), and the measured resection technique was used in 70 patients (70 knees). The surgical, imaging, and knee function data were compared.ResultsThe gap-balancing technique assisted by PSI and the new balancing device was found to be feasible in all operated knees and reliable. In total, 150 patients (152 knees) of ages ranging from 52 to 78 years (mean 67 years) underwent TKA during the study period. The follow-up period ranged from 35 to 52 months (mean 45 months). Only one patient, who was included in the gap-balancing group, underwent a revision surgery at 2 years postoperatively due to infection. There were no differences in the incidence of anterior knee pain between the two groups. The mean flexion angle, KSS scores, and VAS scores did not significantly differ between the measured resection group and gap-balancing group at 12 weeks or 36 weeks postoperatively. The average joint line displacement was 1.3 ± 1.1 mm (range 0–3) proximally in the GB (gap-balancing) group and 1.2 ± 1.4 mm in the MR (measured-resection) group. No outliers >5 mm in either group were recorded. The mean leg axis deviation from the neutral mechanical axis was 1.8°±1.5° varus (range 0°–3°varus) versus the neutral mechanical axis in the GB group and 1.4°±1.2°(range 0°–3°)in the MR group. No outliers with >3° deviation in either group were recorded.ConclusionsThe gap-balancing technique performed with the new balancing device and PSI can yield accurate femoral component alignment as well as outcomes similar to those of measured resection at 3 years. The new balancing device can be taken into consideration by surgeons who prefer performing the gap-balancing technique with PSI.

Influence of Patellar Morphology Classified by Wiberg Classification on Knee Joint Function and Patellofemoral Tracking After Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Patellar Resurfacing

BackgroundTo evaluate the influence of patellar morphology on knee joint function and patellofemoral tracking in patients with primary osteoarthritis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing. MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of 156 patients with primary osteoarthritis who underwent TKA without patellar resurfacing from April 2018 to July 2019. As per Wiberg classification, patients were divided into Wiberg type I (group A, n = 38), II (group B, n = 88), and III (group C, n = 30) groups. The clinical data, postoperative follow-up data, and radiological data between three groups were compared. ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in the HSS score and Feller score between the three groups before surgery and at each follow-up point after surgery (P > .05). At the last follow-up, there were no significant differences in the height and relative thickness of the patella between the three groups (P > .05). However, the incidence of anterior knee pain was significantly higher in group C than in the group B (P < .05). The patellar tilt angle was significantly larger in group C than in the groups A and B (both P < .05). The patellar facet angle was significantly larger in group A than in group B and C, which was also significantly larger in group B than in group C (both P < .05). ConclusionPatients with three different morphologic types of the patella both exhibited improved knee joint function after TKA, however, patients with Wiberg type Ⅲ patella were more prone to have poor patellofemoral tracking and anterior knee pain after surgery.

Difference in Pain, Complication Rates, and Clinical Outcomes After Suprapatellar Versus Infrapatellar Nailing for Tibia Fractures? A Systematic Review of 1447 Patients.

To assess the effectiveness of suprapatellar (SP)-nailing versus infrapatellar (IP)-nailing of tibia fractures in anterior knee pain, complications (retropatellar chondropathy, infection, and malalignment) and physical functioning and quality of life. A clinical question-driven and thorough systematic review of current literature is provided. PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies published between 2010 and 2020 relating to SP and IP-nailing of tibia fractures. The study is performed in concordance with PRISMA-guidelines. Studies eligible for inclusion were randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies reporting on outcomes of interest. Data extraction was performed independently by 2 assessors. Methodological quality and risk of bias was assessed according to the guidelines of the McMaster Critical Appraisal. Continuous variables are presented as means with SD and dichotomous variables as frequency and percentages. The weighted mean, standardized weighted mean differences, and 95% confidence interval were calculated. A pooled analysis could not be performed because of differences in outcome measures, time-points, and heterogeneity. Fourteen studies with 1447 patients were analyzed. The weighted incidence of anterior knee pain was 29% after SP-nailing and 39% after IP-nailing, without reported significance. There was a significant lower rate of malalignment after the SP-approach (4% vs. 26%) with small absolute differences in all planes. No substantial differences were observed in retropatellar chondropathy, infection, physical functioning, and quality of life. This systematic review does not reveal superiority of either technique in any of the respective outcomes of interest. Definitive choice should depend on the surgeon's experience and available resources. Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.