Anterior Decompression Surgery Research Articles

Does Focal Kyphotic Deformity at Non-responsible Levels Affect the Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion?

Focal cervical kyphotic deformity (FCK) without neurologic compression is not uncommon in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) who underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) surgery. It remains unclear whether FCK at non-responsible levels needs to be treated simultaneously. This study aims to investigate whether FCK at non-responsible levels is the prognostic factor for CSM and elucidate the surgical indication for FCK. Patients with CSM who underwent ACDF between January 2016 and April 2021 were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of FCK and two classifications according to global cervical sagittal alignment. Clinical outcomes were compared using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and recovery rate (RR) of neurologic function. Univariate and multivariate analysis based on RR assessed the relationship between various possible prognostic factors and clinical outcomes. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of the focal Cobb angle to predict poor clinical outcomes. A total of 94 patients were included, 41 with FCK and 53 without. Overall, the RR of neurologic function was significantly lower in the FCK than in the non-FCK group. Further analysis showed that the RR difference between the two groups was only observed in hypo-lordosis classification (kyphotic and sigmoid alignment), but not in the lordosis classification. Multivariate analysis showed that the preoperative focal Cobb angle in the FCK level (OR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.18-0.97) was independently associated with clinical outcomes in the hypo-lordosis classification. The optimal cutoff point of the preoperative focal kyphotic Cobb angle was calculated at 4.05°. For CSM with hypo-lordosis, FCK was a risk factor for poor postoperative outcomes. Surgeons may consider treating the FCK simultaneously if the focal kyphotic Cobb angle of FCK is greater than 4.05° and is accompanied by cervical global kyphotic or sigmoid deformity.

A novel computed tomography scoring system for evaluating the risk of dural defects in anterior surgery for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

ObjectiveTo develop and validate a computed tomography (CT)-based scoring system for evaluating the risk of dural defects (DDs) in anterior surgery for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed CT imaging features of 114 OPLL patients in our institute who received anterior decompression surgery. Intraoperative DDs were found in 16 patients. A multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the predictors. According to the odd ratio of the included risk factors, we developed a CT scoring system for evaluating the risk of DDs in anterior OPLL surgery. The system was further validated in an independent group of 39 OPLL patients. ResultsWe developed a CT scoring system as follows: hook sign (2 points), K-line (-) (1 point) and broad base (1 point). Thus, the system comprised 4 total points, and patients were at high risks of dural defects when the score ≥3 points. The operating characteristics of a score ≥3 for predicting DDs in the validation group were: sensitivity of 0.83, specificity of 0.94, LR positive of 13.75, LR negative of 0.18 and AUC of 0.886. The discriminatory ability of the proposed score could be demonstrated in the validation cohort. ConclusionsThe relatively simple and easy-to-use scoring system we propose integrates the 3 most reliable spinal CT findings observed in patients with OPLL and a DD. The likelihood to identify the underlying risks of spinal CSF leaks may be useful to triage patients who may benefit from indirect decompression techniques.

370 Is There an Optimal Surgical Approach in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy?: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Contradictions exist about impact of anterior vs. posterior surgical approach on outcomes of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). METHODS: Individual patient data of subjects who underwent surgery for DCM was identified from a pooled dataset of the AO Spine CSM-North America, CSM-International, and CSM-Protect clinical studies. Primary outcomes were changes in short form 36 Physical Component Summary score (SF36-PCS) and mJOA score at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were change in total Neck Disability Index (NDI) score and SF36 Mental Component Summary score (SF36-MCS). Two comparison cohorts were created: i) anterior surgery and ii) posterior surgery. One-stage mixed-effects meta-analysis with study and treatment exposure as random effects was performed and reported with mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. A subgroup analysis planned a priori in mild DCM patients (mJOA 15-17) was performed. RESULTS: A total of 979 patients met eligibility criteria. Patients who had anterior decompressive surgery experienced greater improvements at 1yr of follow-up than those who underwent posterior decompressive surgery in SF36-PCS score (adjusted MD 1.57 [95% CI 0.11 to 3.03], p = 0.0348) and NDI score (adjusted MD 3.32 [95% CI 0.58 to 6.05], p = 0.0172). A greater proportion of patients that underwent anterior surgery achieved clinically important recovery of their NDI (OR 1.49 [95% CI 1.15 to 1.93], p = 0.002; aOR 1.46 [95% CI 1.08 to 1.96], p = 0.013) and SF36-PCS scores at 1yr (OR 1.45 [95% CI 1.12 to 1.88], p = 0.004, aOR 1.34 [95% CI 1.00 to 1.80], p = 0.052). In patients with mild DCM (n = 186), patients who underwent anterior decompressive surgery experienced greater improvements in SF36-PCS score, mJOA score, and Neck Disability Index score than posterior surgical patients. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior surgical decompression for DCM is associated with greater improvements in 1yr patient-reported outcomes than posterior surgical decompression.

Effect of Intelligent Health Education Based on Health Belief Model on Patients With Kinesophobia After Surgical Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis

To explore the application effect of intelligent health education based on the health belief model on patients with postoperative kinesophobia after surgical treatment of cervical spondylosis. A prospective cohort study was conducted with patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy, decompression, and fusion surgery with a single central nerve and spine center, and who had postoperative kinesophobia, ie, fear of movement. The patients made voluntary decisions concerning whether they would receive the intervention of intelligent health education. The patients were divided into a control group and an intelligent education group and the intervention started on the second day after the surgery. The intelligent education group received intelligent education starting from the second day after surgery through a WeChat widget that used the health belief model as the theoretical framework. The intelligent health education program was designed according to the concept of patient problems, needs, guidance, practice, and feedbacks. It incorporated four modules, including knowledge, intelligent exercise, overcoming obstacles, and sharing and interaction. It had such functions as reminders, fun exercise, shadowing exercise, monitoring, and documentation. Health education for the control group also started on the second day after surgery and was conducted by a method of brochures of pictures and text and WeChat group reminder messages. The participants were surveyed before discharge and 3 months after their surgery. The primary outcome measure compared between the two groups was the degree of kinesophobia. Secondary outcome measures included differences in adherence to functional exercise (Functional Exercise Adherence Scale), pain level (Visual Analogue Scale score), degree of cervical functional impairment (Cervical Disability Index), and quality of life (primarily assessed by the Quality of Life Short Form 12 [SF-12] scale for psychological and physiological health scores). A total of 112 patients were enrolled and 108 patients completed follow-up. Eventually, there were 53 cases in the intelligent education group and 55 cases in the control group. None of the patients experienced any sports-related injuries. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary and secondary outcome measures between the two groups at the time of discharge. At the 3-month follow-up after the surgery, the level of kinesophobia in the intelligent education group (25.72±3.90) was lower than that in the control group (29.67±6.16), and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). In the intelligent education group, the degree of pain (expressed in the median [25th percentile, 75th percentile]) was lower than that of the control group (0 [0, 0] vs. 1 [1, 2], P<0.05), the functional exercise adherence was better than that of the control group (63.87±7.26 vs. 57.73±8.07, P<0.05), the psychological health was better than that of the control group (40.78±3.98 vs. 47.78±1.84, P<0.05), and the physical health was better than that of the control group (43.16±4.41 vs. 46.30±3.80, P<0.05), with all the differences being statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in the degree of cervical functional impairment between the two groups (1 [1, 2] vs. 3 [2, 7], P>0.05). Intelligent health education based on the health belief model can help reduce the degree of kinesophobia in patients with postoperative kinesophobia after surgical treatment of cervical spondylosis and improve patient prognosis.

Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Therapy for Patients With Hirayama Disease

To investigate the clinical outcomes of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) surgery for the treatment of Hirayama disease (HD). In this study, 15 patients with HD who underwent ACDF operation between March 2022 and March 2023 with complete data were retrospectively analyzed. Following the diagnosis, conservative treatment was ineffective, and thus, disease progression severely affected the quality of life of patients. ACDF was performed in the China-Japan Friendship Hospital, and patients were regularly followed up postoperatively. The cervical range of motion (ROM), the anteroposterior and transverse diameter of the spinal cord, and their ratio were measured before and after the operation. The neurological function of patients before and after the last follow-up was evaluated using the selected brief-Michigan Hand Questionnaire (sb-MHQ), whilst the overall therapeutic effect after the operation was evaluated using Odom's criteria. All patients were followed up for an average of 12 ±4.5 (6-18) months. Dynamic X-ray displayed that the ROM of cervical vertebrae decreased from 72.73 ±12.72 ° (53-97 °) to 33.53 °±10.34 ° (15-54 °) (P < 0.001). Moreover, flexion cervical MRI performed after the operation revealed that spinal cord compression was markedly relieved, and the ratio of the anteroposterior diameter of the spinal cord to the transverse diameter increased from 0.27 ±0.09 to 0.43 ±0.03 (P < 0.001). At the last follow-up visit, finger extension tremor symptoms were alleviated, although they did not completely disappear. Contrastingly, muscle atrophy showed no significant improvement. Finally, the sb-MHQ score significantly increased from 17.33 ±1.76 preoperatively to 24.80 ±1.78 at the last follow-up (P < 0.001). Our results collectively highlighted the efficacy of ACDF for the treatment of HD. This procedure can limit excessive cervical flexion and repeated compression of the spinal cord during cervical movement and considerably improve upper limb functions.

Intraoperative Protection of Pharyngeal Autonomic Nerves: Preventing Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Surgery

The study aims to investigate whether intraoperative protection of the pharyngeal autonomic nerve can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative dysphagia following anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery (ACDF). A retrospective analysis was conducted on 130 cases that underwent ACDF from January 2018 to June 2022 at our hospital. Divided into nonautonomic neuroprotection (NANP) group and autonomic neuroprotection group based on whether receive protective measures for the pharyngeal autonomic nerve during surgery. General data were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated using Neck Disability Index, Japanese Orthopaedics Association (JOA) score, and JOA improvement rate. The incidence and severity of postoperative dysphagia were assessed using Bazaz dysphagia assessment criteria and swallowing-quality of life questionnaire. There were no significant differences in general data (P > 0.05). The average operation time and intraoperative blood loss also showed no significant differences (P > 0.05). Both groups showed significant improvements in Neck Disability Index and JOA scores at all follow-up time points compared to preoperative scores (P < 0.01). The incidence of postoperative dysphagia in the autonomic neuroprotection group was significantly lower than that in the NANP group at all follow-up time points (P< 0.05). Both group showed a significant reduction in scores 3 days postoperatively compared to preoperative scores (P < 0.01), and the NANP group also showed significant reductions in scores at 3 month and 1 year postoperative follow-up time points compared to preoperative scores (P < 0.01). The adoption of pharyngeal autonomic nerve protective measures during ACDF can effectively lower the probability of postoperative dysphagia.

An Overview of Recent Advances in Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Surgery.

Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) has evolved significantly in the last few years with the aim of enhancing effectiveness and safety while reducing hospitalization and healthcare-related costs. Transitioning from iliac crest autografts to allografts minimizes donor-site complications like pain, infections, and hematoma. Allograft options, such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and tantalum, vary in their osteoinductive properties and elastic modulus, influencing fusion rates, time, and the rate of subsidence. Recently introduced zero-profile cages offer bone fixation through screws, resulting in reduced blood loss, improved spinal alignment, and decreased complications like dysphagia and adjacent segment disease. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has gained widespread use. The North American Spine Society (NASS) 2023 recommendations endorse IONM in cervical deformity corrections and myelopathy cases. Insufficient studies hinder clear radiculopathy recommendations, but emerging research supports IONM for patients at greater risk of C5 nerve root injury or positional injury. Advancements in hemostatic agents, such as gelatin sponges, oxidized cellulose, and fibrin sealants, contribute to safety by reducing postoperative hematoma rates and eliminating the need for drainage. Innovations like the exoscope, endoscope, and computed-tomography (CT) navigation have transformed surgical practices. Exoscopes are emerging as an alternative to microscopes, offering benefits like a smaller footprint, adjustable positioning, lower costs, and shared intraoperative views for educational purposes. The use of endoscope offers the possibility of performing a minimally invasive technique with improved results in terms of cosmesis and patient-perceived outcome. CT navigation can be useful in high-risk procedures, such as cervical plate placement for major instability. This paper provides an overview of cutting-edge technologies in ACDF surgery, emphasizing cage materials and designs, safety measures, and operating room advancements. It also highlights areas for future research, underlining the procedure's continuous evolution.

Diagnosis and treatment of 11 patients with cevical spondylotic amyotrophy

To explore clinical features, treatment methods and clinical effects of cervical spondylosis with proximal muscular atrophy. Eleven patients with proximal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy were retrospectively studied from September 2016 to November 2020, including 7 males and 4 females, aged 38 to 68 years old. Clinical symptoms, MRI and neuroelectrophysiological manifestations were analyzed, and patients were treated with conservative treatment or anterior cervical decompression fusion surgery, respectively. The efficacy was evaluated by manual muscle test (MMT) before and after treatment, and patients' satisfaction was followed up at the same time. All patients were followed up for 6 to 19 months. All 11 patients were unilateral, mainly manifested by atrophy of deltoid muscle, supraspinatus muscle and infraspinatus muscle, and may be accompanied by ipsilateral neck and shoulder pain at early stage. MRI showed lesions at C4,5, C5,6 segments were more common. Electrophysiological examination showed the affected muscle was denervated, and amplitude of compound muscle action potential (CMAP) of innervated nerve on the affected side was lower than that on the healthy side. All patients were obtained bone fusion. One patient who were underwent anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) occurred developed contralateral C5 nerve root paralysis after operation, which recovered completely after 10 weeks of symptomatic treatment. At 12 months after operation, the efficacy was evaluated according to MMT, 3 patients were treated conservatively, 2 patients excellent and 1 good;in 8 patients treated by operation, 3 patients were excellent, 4 good, and 1 moderate. The incidence of cervical spondylosis with proximal muscular atrophy is low, which is manifested as unilateral proximal muscle atrophy and may be accompanied by ipsilateral neck and shoulder pain in the early stage. Combined with MRI and neuroelectrophysiological examination, misdiagnosis could be reduced. In the early stage of disease, especially in the case of nucleus pulposus protrusion leading to nerve compression, conservative treatment could be taken. When the conservative treatment is ineffective or the pain cannot be tolerated, anterior decompression surgery is recommended, and the overall effect is satisfactory.

Predictive Value of Preoperative Short Form-36 Survey Scale for Postoperative Axial Neck Pain in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

Prospective observational study. To evaluate the predictive value of the preoperative Short Form-36 survey (SF-36) scale for postoperative axial neck pain (ANP) in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) who underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) surgery. This study enrolled patients with DCM who underwent ACDF surgery at author's Hospital between May 2010 and June 2016. Out of 126 eligible patients, 122 completed the 3-month follow-up and 117 completed the 1-year follow-up. The results showed that the preoperative social functioning (SF) subscale score of the SF-36 scale was significantly lower in patients with moderate-to-severe postoperative ANP than in those with no or mild postoperative ANP at both follow-up timepoints (P < .05). ACDF at C4-5 level resulted in a higher ANP rate than ACDF at C5-6 or C6-7 level, both at 3-month (P = .019) and 1-year (P = .004) follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that the preoperative social functioning subscale score was an independent risk factor for moderate-to-severe postoperative ANP at 3months and 1year after surgery, and preoperative NRS was an independent risk factor at 1-year follow-up. No other demographic, clinical, or radiographic factors were found to be associated with postoperative ANP severity (P < .05). Preoperative social functioning subscale score of SF-36 scale might be a favorable predictive tool for postoperative ANP in DCM patients who underwent ACDF surgery.

Anterior Cervical Hybrid Decompression and Fusion Surgery to Treat Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common disease resulting from intervertebral disc herniation, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, and other pathological changes that cause spinal cord compression. CSM progresses insidiously with mild upper-limb numbness, which patients tend to ignore. As the condition worsens, the patients may experience a limp, limited fine motor activity, and eventually, a loss of daily activity. Conservative treatments, such as physical therapy and medication, are frequently ineffective for CSM. Once surgery is deemed to be required, decompression surgery is the best option. So far, both anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) have been commonly used to treat CSM. In addition, a type of hybrid procedure that combines ACDF with ACCF has been used to treat some CSM cases and achieved satisfying results. Thus, this study aims to introduce this hybrid surgical technique and advocate for it based on its patient success.

A more than 20-year follow-up of pain and disability after anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery for degenerative disc disease and comparisons between two surgical techniques

BackgroundFollow-ups more than 20 years after neck surgery are extremely rare. No previous randomized studies have investigated differences in pain and disability more than 20 years after ACDF surgery using different techniques. The purpose of this study was to describe pain and functioning more than 20 years after anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery, and to compare outcomes between the Cloward Procedure and the carbon fiber fusion cage (CIFC).MethodsThis study is a 20 to 24-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Questionnaires were sent to 64 individuals, at least 20 years after ACDF due to cervical radiculopathy. Fifty individuals (mean age 69, 60% women, 55% CIFC) completed questionnaires. Mean time since surgery was 22.4 years (range 20,5–24). Primary outcomes were neck pain and neck disability index (NDI). Secondary outcomes were frequency and intensity of neck and arm pain, headache, dizziness, self-efficacy, health related quality of life or global outcome. Clinically relevant improvements were defined as 30 mm decrease in pain and a decrease in disability of 20 percentage units. Between-group differences over time were analyzed with mixed design ANOVA and relationships between main outcomes and psychosocial factors were analyzed by Spearman´s rho.ResultsNeck pain and NDI score significantly improved over time (p < .001), with no group differences in primary or secondary outcomes. Eighty-eight per cent of participants experienced improvements or full recovery, 71% (pain) and 41% (NDI) had clinically relevant improvements. Pain and NDI were correlated with lower self-efficacy and quality of life.ConclusionThe results from this study do not support the idea that fusion technique affects long-term outcome of ACDF. Pain and disability improved substantially over time, irrespective of surgical technique. However, the majority of participants reported residual disability not to a negligible extent. Pain and disability were correlated to lower self-efficacy and quality of life.

Characteristics of Postoperative C5 Palsy Following Anterior Decompression and Fusion Surgery for Cervical Degenerative Disorders: Trends Associated with Advancements in Surgical Technique

To investigate trends in the characteristics of postoperative C5 palsy following anterior decompression and fusion associated with advancements in this surgical procedure to treat cervical degenerative disorders. We included 801 consecutive patients who underwent anterior decompression and fusion for cervical degenerative disorders from 2006 to 2019 and investigated the incidence, onset, and prognosis of C5 palsy. In addition, we compared the incidence of C5 palsy with that found in our previous investigation. The cases of 42 (5.2%) patients were complicated by C5 palsy. For patients with ossification of the longitudinal ligament (OPLL), 22 (12.4%) of 177 were complicated with C5 palsy, and the incidence was significantly higher than that in patients without OPLL (20 [3.2%] of 624, P < 0.01). The incidence of C5 palsy in patients without OPLL was significantly lower than that found in our previous investigation (P < 0.01). The incidence of C5 palsy in patients that required contiguous multilevel corpectomy was significantly higher in patients that required within a single corpectomy (P < 0.01). At 1-year follow-up, muscle strength in 3 (6.1%) of 49 limbs had not improved sufficiently. With advancements in surgical techniques which allowed necessary and sufficient spinal cord decompression and avoided unnecessary corpectomy, the incidence of C5 palsy in patients without OPLL was decreased significantly. By contrast, for patients with OPLL, the incidence of C5 palsy was similar to the incidence found previously, perhaps because a broad and contiguous multilevel corpectomy was usually needed to decompress the spinal cord sufficiently.

Posterior Hybrid Technique for the Treatment of Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury with High Signal Intensity on T2WI.

To evaluate the efficacy of the posterior hybrid technique (PHT) for the treatment of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury without vertebral fracture or dislocation with high signal intensity on T2WI (CSCIH). A comparative analysis of clinical efficacy between CSCIH patients who underwent anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) surgery and those who underwent PHT surgery was retrospectively conducted. Demographic characteristics, cervical range of motion (CRM), cross-sectional area of spinal cord (CSASC), spinal canal area residual rate (SCARR), high signal intensity ratio (HSIR), Cervical Japanese Orthopedic Association (CJOA) score, and neck disability index (NDI) were assessed. Forty-three CSCIH cases with PHT and 46 CSCIH cases with ADF were collected from January 2013 to January 2017. The CRM in patients with PHT was superior to that in patients with ADF at the final follow-up (64.21 ± 18.46° vs. 48.71 ± 19.34°, p = 0.0002). The SCARR also showed greater improvements in the PHT group than in the ADF group (final follow-up: 93.54 ± 11.09% vs. 88.13 ± 10.84%, p = 0.022). Both groups indicated significant improvements in the CSASC and HSIR (p < 0.05); however, no significant differences were observed between the two groups. All patients showed improvements in the CJOA score and the NDI after surgery (p < 0.05). At the 6-month follow-up, the ADF group had better NDI scores than the PHT group (31.17 ± 10.42 vs. 36.78 ± 9.65, p = 0.010), whereas the PHT group exhibited better improvements than the ADF group at the final follow-up (66.86 ± 9.28% vs. 57.67 ± 10.22%, p < 0.0001). The PHT was as effective as ADF in the treatment of CSCIH, whereas the PHT was superior in the improvement of patients' health-related quality of life and in CRM preservation during the long-term follow-up.

Diffusion basis spectrum imaging predicts long-term clinical outcomes following surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy

BACKGROUND CONTEXTA major shortcoming in improving care for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients is the lack of robust quantitative imaging tools to guide surgical decision-making. Diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI), an advanced diffusion-weighted MRI technique, provides objective assessments of white matter tract integrity that may help prognosticate outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for CSM. PURPOSETo examine the ability of DBSI to predict clinically important CSM outcome measures at 2-years follow-up. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGProspective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLEPatients undergoing decompressive cervical surgery for CSM. OUTCOME MEASURESNeurofunctional status was assessed by the mJOA, MDI, and DASH. Quality-of-life was measured by the SF-36 PCS and SF-36 MCS. The NDI evaluated self-reported neck pain, and patient satisfaction was assessed by the NASS satisfaction index. METHODSFifty CSM patients who underwent cervical decompressive surgery were enrolled. Preoperative DBSI metrics assessed white matter tract integrity through fractional anisotropy, fiber fraction, axial diffusivity, and radial diffusivity. To evaluate extra-axonal diffusion, DBSI measures restricted and nonrestricted fractions. Patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated preoperatively and up to 2-years follow-up. Support vector machine classification algorithms were used to predict surgical outcomes at 2-years follow-up. Specifically, three feature sets were built for each of the seven clinical outcome measures (eg, mJOA), including clinical only, DBSI only, and combined feature sets. RESULTSTwenty-seven mild (mJOA 15–17), 12 moderate (12–14) and 11 severe (0–11) CSM patients were enrolled. Twenty-four (60%) patients underwent anterior decompressive surgery compared with 16 (40%) posterior approaches. The mean (SD) follow-up was 23.2 (5.6, range 6.1–32.8) months. Feature sets built on combined data (ie, clinical+DBSI metrics) performed significantly better for all outcome measures compared with those only including clinical or DBSI data. When predicting improvement in the mJOA, the clinically driven feature set had an accuracy of 61.9 [61.6, 62.5], compared with 78.6 [78.4, 79.2] in the DBSI feature set, and 90.5 [90.2, 90.8] in the combined feature set. CONCLUSIONSWhen combined with key clinical covariates, preoperative DBSI metrics predicted improvement after surgical decompression for CSM with high accuracy for multiple outcome measures. These results suggest that DBSI may serve as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for CSM valuable in guiding patient selection and informing preoperative counseling. LEVEL OF EVIDENCEII

Anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery for cervicogenic headache: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

Cervicogenic headache (CEH) has long been recognized as a referred pain deriving from pathological changes in the upper cervical nerves. However, previous clinical studies found that anterior lower cervical discectomy for the treatment of cervical myelopathy and/or radiculopathy can also help relieve associated headaches. To date, there is still a lack of large sample and prospective study to investigate the effect of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) on CEH associated with cervical spondylosis. A total of 656 patients with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy were enrolled in three spinal centers. Among them, 221 patients who were diagnosed with CEH were collected in this study, and 204 completed a 1-year follow-up. The primary endpoint was headache intensity during a 12-month follow-up period measured by the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). The secondary outcome measures included headache frequency, headache duration, and the neck disability index (NDI). Among all 204 patients with CEH who completed a 1-year follow-up, 166 received anterior cervical surgery (surgery group) and 38 received conservative treatment (conservative group). There were statistically significant lower NPRS in the surgical group during follow-up. Between-group differences showed that NPRS in the surgery group was significantly greater improvement at 1 month (2.8, 95% CI: 2.0, 3.6), 3 months (2.6, 95% CI: 1.8, 3.4), 6 months (2.4, 95% CI: 1.6, 3.2), and 12 months (1.5, 95% CI: 0.7, 2.4) (p < 0.05 for all). There were statistically significant lower NDI, less frequent headaches, and lower headache duration in the surgery group during follow-up (p < 0.05 for all). This study indicates that ACDF can effectively relieve CEH associated with cervical myelopathy and/or radiculopathy.

Stand-alone anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery: A cohort study evaluating a shaped cage without plates or screws.

BackgroundThe anterior approach to the cervical spine is the most commonly used surgery with effective decompression and less surgical trauma. Anterior plate construct (APC) is considered a standard technique. However, it appears to cause implant failure and postoperative dysphagia. Due to these reasons, locking stand-alone cages (LSCs) without the addition of an anterior plate have been developed and gained popularity in the past decade. In theory, an LSC could provide immediate load-bearing support to the anterior column of the cervical spine and may enhance the rate of arthrodesis. However, screw skiving and backing off are known complications of LSC. Given the characteristic shape of cervical discs, we wondered whether there may be a role for a shape-conforming cage without screws and plates to achieve desired outcomes, i.e., a true stand-alone cage (TSC). A single surgeon cohort using the cage in a heterogenic set of indications was evaluated.MethodsA total of 45 patients with degenerative cervical conditions who underwent surgery using TSC using CoRoent Small Contoured peek cage (Nuvasive, San Diego, CA) and Orthoblend™ (Medtronics, Memphis, TN) were retrospectively reviewed. Comparisons between preoperative and postoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the modified AAOS-Modems disability outcome, Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores, and Short Form 36 were evaluated. Operative time, the occurrence rate of fusion, lordosis change of cervical spine, and occurrence rate of complications were evaluated.ResultsThere were one-level (n = 15), two-level (n = 24), and three-level (n = 6) cases making a total of 81 cages implanted and studied. The mean operative time was 132.7 min. The group demonstrated significant improvements in NRS, AAOS-Modems disability outcome, and NDI scores after surgery (mean follow-up 12 months). The cervical lordosis at pre- and last follow-up period was 8.7 ± 2.2° and 8.3 ± 3.2°, respectively. The complication rate was 21.2%.ConclusionsTSC yielded satisfactory long-term clinical and radiological outcomes; this preliminary report can form the basis of a cost–benefit analysis study either prospectively or by way of meta-modeling comparing APC, LSC to TSC.

Treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy using ACDF or a combination of ACDF and ACCF.

ObjectivesThis study aims to compare the outcomes between two anterior decompression and fusion techniques to treat multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM).MethodsAfter the screening for eligibility, a total of 66 patients were admitted to this study. These participants underwent anterior surgeries due to MCSM in our hospital between June 2016 and July 2018. All participants underwent either the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery (ACDF group) or the combination of ACDF and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), which was the anterior cervical hybrid decompression and fusion (ACHDF) surgery group. All the patients were followed up ≥18 months, the average latest followed up time was 23.64 (±2.69) months. The length of hospitalization, operation time, blood loss, visual analog scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, improvement rate, Hounsfield units (HU) of C3–C7, cobb angle, and anterior column height of fusion levels pre and post operation were analyzed.ResultsThere were no statistical differences between the ACDF and ACHDF groups regarding the length of hospitalization, operation time, blood loss, HU of C3–C7, VAS, JOA score, improvement rate, cobb angle, and anterior column height in fusion levels in pre-operation and 3 months after operation (all P > 0.05). However, compared with the ACHDF group, the ACDF group achieved significantly better improvement in the anterior column height of fusion levels in the final 18–29 months post-operatively (P < 0.05).ConclusionsBoth approaches of ACDF alone and a combination of ACDF and ACCF can achieve satisfactory outcomes in the treatment of MCSM, but ACDF has better outcomes in maintaining anterior column height of fusion levels.

Research protocol: Cervical Arthroplasty Cost Effectiveness Study (CACES): economic evaluation of anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) in the surgical treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease — a randomized controlled trial

IntroductionTo date, there is no consensus on which anterior surgical technique is more cost-effective in treating cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). The most commonly used surgical treatment for patients with single- or multi-level symptomatic CDDD is anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF). However, new complaints of radiculopathy and/or myelopathy commonly develop at adjacent levels, also known as clinical adjacent segment pathology (CASP). The extent to which kinematics, surgery-induced fusion, natural history, and progression of disease play a role in the development of CASP remains unclear. Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) is another treatment option that is thought to reduce the incidence of CASP by preserving motion in the operated segment. While ACDA is often discouraged, as the implant costs are higher while the clinical outcomes are similar to ACDF, preventing CASP might be a reason for ACDA to be a more cost-effective technique in the long term.Methods and analysisIn this randomized controlled trial, patients will be randomized to receive ACDF or ACDA in a 1:1 ratio. Adult patients with single- or multi-level CDDD and symptoms of radiculopathy and/or myelopathy will be included. The primary outcome is cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of both techniques from a healthcare and societal perspective. Secondary objectives are the differences in clinical and radiological outcomes between the two techniques, as well as the qualitative process surrounding anterior decompression surgery. All outcomes will be measured at baseline and every 6 months until 4 years post-surgery.DiscussionHigh-quality evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of both ACDA and ACDF is lacking; to date, there are no prospective trials from a societal perspective. Considering the aging of the population and the rising healthcare costs, there is an urgent need for a solid clinical cost-effectiveness trial addressing this question.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04623593. Registered on 29 September 2020.

A Systematic Review on Neurological Outcomes for Cervical Degenerative Myelopathy After Anterior Decompression Surgery: Motion Preservation vs Fusion.

Although it is well established that surgically treated patients with cervical degenerative myelopathy (CDM) improve irrespective of the anterior decompression technique used, no consensus exists on what technique is superior in terms of neurological recovery. A general concern exists that anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) leads to less favorable outcomes in CDM due to microtrauma caused by preserved mobility. It is remarkable that current literature mainly uses pain scores to assess clinical outcomes after anterior decompression surgery, especially considering that pain may not be the most relevant outcome for CDM. This systematic review evaluated the literature concerning neurological outcomes in patients with CDM treated with anterior decompression surgery and assessed by validated myelopathy scores. Systematic searches were carried out in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. Prospective studies were included when patients with isolated CDM were treated with anterior decompression surgery, and a validated myelopathy outcome score was used. A total of 11 studies were included from the 16,032 identified studies. All studies used the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) outcome score and showed improvement for all anterior techniques. The mean improvement in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) was 4.80 and 3.64 for the modified JOA and JOA outcome scores, respectively. The JOA for ACDA showed a mean improvement of 5.51. The overall quality of the included articles was low to moderate according to the Cochrane tool. Neurological recovery of CDM is similar after all anterior decompression techniques, including ACDA when compared with ACDF. The current literature gives no reason to dissuade the use of ACDA in cervical myelopathy.

Treatment of cervical non-union with cervical disc replacement: A case series.

IntroductionCervical disc replacement (CDR) has become prevalent in the treatment of cervical pathology. CDR is an appealing option for several reasons, including improvement of symptoms, preservation of range of motion, and the absence of risk for nonunion – a complication of an anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) surgery. In this case series, we explore the use of CDR to treat cervical nonunion.MethodsFour patients, ages 50 to 64, presented to one surgeon with symptomatic cervical nonunion. Three of the four patients possessed risk factors for further nonunion and were therefore considered especially well-suited to a CDR rather than a revision ACDF. X-ray, MRI, and CT were used to confirm the presence of nonunion and to determine the architectural feasibility of replacing the level with a cervical disc arthroplasty. Six total nonunion levels were present in four patients (two levels in two patients and one level in two patients). Each of the nonunion levels was successfully treated with a revision decompression and CDR.ResultsPostoperatively, all four patients experienced improvement of nonunion symptoms. Neck Disability Index improved on average by 75% (preoperative score 51% to postoperative score 13%). Flexion-extension X-rays were available in three patients, which showed an increase in an average range of motion from 2 degrees to 7 degrees at the revised levels.ConclusionThe series describing four successful cases expands the current literature and provides support for future investigation into CDR as a treatment for cervical nonunion. We propose CDR as a viable option to treat symptomatic cervical nonunion and restore range of motion in patients without significant arthrosis and with preserved endplate architecture.