Anterior Decompression And Fusion Research Articles

Characteristics of Postoperative C5 Palsy Following Anterior Decompression and Fusion Surgery for Cervical Degenerative Disorders: Trends Associated with Advancements in Surgical Technique

To investigate trends in the characteristics of postoperative C5 palsy following anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) associated with advancements in this surgical procedure to treat cervical degenerative disorders. We included 801 consecutive patients who underwent ADF for cervical degenerative disorders from 2006 to 2019, and investigated the incidence, onset, and prognosis of C5 palsy. In addition, we compared the incidence of C5 palsy with that found in our previous investigation. The cases of 42 (5.2%) patients were complicated by C5 palsy. For patients with ossification of the longitudinal ligament (OPLL), 22 (12.4%) of 177 were complicated with C5 palsy, and the incidence was significantly higher than that in patients without OPLL (20 [3.2%] of 624, p < 0.01). The incidence of C5 palsy in patients without OPLL was significantly lower than that found in our previous investigation (p < 0.01). The incidence of C5 palsy in patients that required contiguous multilevel corpectomy was significantly higher in patients that required within a single corpectomy (p < 0.01). At one-year follow-up, muscle strength in 3 (6.1%) of 49 limbs had not improved sufficiently. With advancements in surgical techniques which allowed necessary and sufficient spinal cord decompression and avoided unnecessary corpectomy, the incidence of C5 palsy in patients without OPLL was decreased significantly. By contrast, for patients with OPLL, the incidence of C5 palsy was similar to the incidence found previously, perhaps because a broad and contiguous multilevel corpectomy was usually needed to decompress the spinal cord sufficiently.

Augmented Reality Support for Anterior Decompression and Fusion Using Floating Method for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

Anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) using the floating method for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is an ideal surgical technique, but it has a specific risk of insufficient decompression caused by the impingement of residual ossification. Augmented reality (AR) support is a novel technology that enables the superimposition of images onto the view of a surgical field. AR technology was applied to ADF for cervical OPLL to facilitate intraoperative anatomical orientation and OPLL identification. In total, 14 patients with cervical OPLL underwent ADF with microscopic AR support. The outline of the OPLL and the bilateral vertebral arteries was marked after intraoperative CT, and the reconstructed 3D image data were transferred and linked to the microscope. The AR microscopic view enabled us to visualize the ossification outline, which could not be seen directly in the surgical field, and allowed sufficient decompression of the ossification. Neurological disturbances were improved in all patients. No cases of serious complications, such as major intraoperative bleeding or reoperation due to the postoperative impingement of the floating OPLL, were registered. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the introduction of microscopic AR into ADF using the floating method for cervical OPLL with favorable clinical results.

Posterior Hybrid Technique for the Treatment of Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury with High Signal Intensity on T2WI.

To evaluate the efficacy of the posterior hybrid technique (PHT) for the treatment of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury without vertebral fracture or dislocation with high signal intensity on T2WI (CSCIH). A comparative analysis of clinical efficacy between CSCIH patients who underwent anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) surgery and those who underwent PHT surgery was retrospectively conducted. Demographic characteristics, cervical range of motion (CRM), cross-sectional area of spinal cord (CSASC), spinal canal area residual rate (SCARR), high signal intensity ratio (HSIR), Cervical Japanese Orthopedic Association (CJOA) score, and neck disability index (NDI) were assessed. Forty-three CSCIH cases with PHT and 46 CSCIH cases with ADF were collected from January 2013 to January 2017. The CRM in patients with PHT was superior to that in patients with ADF at the final follow-up (64.21 ± 18.46° vs. 48.71 ± 19.34°, p = 0.0002). The SCARR also showed greater improvements in the PHT group than in the ADF group (final follow-up: 93.54 ± 11.09% vs. 88.13 ± 10.84%, p = 0.022). Both groups indicated significant improvements in the CSASC and HSIR (p < 0.05); however, no significant differences were observed between the two groups. All patients showed improvements in the CJOA score and the NDI after surgery (p < 0.05). At the 6-month follow-up, the ADF group had better NDI scores than the PHT group (31.17 ± 10.42 vs. 36.78 ± 9.65, p = 0.010), whereas the PHT group exhibited better improvements than the ADF group at the final follow-up (66.86 ± 9.28% vs. 57.67 ± 10.22%, p < 0.0001). The PHT was as effective as ADF in the treatment of CSCIH, whereas the PHT was superior in the improvement of patients' health-related quality of life and in CRM preservation during the long-term follow-up.

Anterior Decompression and Fusion for the Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Narrative Review.

Occasionally, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) causes cord compression, resulting in cervical myelopathy. OPLL differs from other causes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in several ways, and the surgical strategy should be chosen with OPLL's characteristics in mind. Although both the anterior and posterior approaches are effective surgical methods for the treatment of OPLL cervical myelopathy, they each have their own set of benefits and drawbacks. Anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) may improve neurological recovery, restore lordosis, and prevent OPLL mass progression. The benefits can be seen in patients with a high canal occupying ratio or kyphotic alignment. We discussed the benefits, limitations, indications, and surgical techniques of ADF for the treatment of OPLL-induced cervical myelopathy in this narrative.

Evaluating a paradigm shift from anterior decompression and fusion to muscle-preserving selective laminectomy: a single-center study of degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Muscle-preserving selective laminectomy (SL) is an alternative to conventional decompression surgery in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). It is less invasive, preserves the extensor musculature, and maintains the range of motion of the cervical spine. Therefore, the preferred treatment for DCM at the authors' institution has changed from anterior decompression and fusion (ADF), including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), toward SL. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes before and after this paradigm shift with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, reoperations, and cost-effectiveness. This study was a retrospective register-based cohort study. All patients with DCM who underwent ADF or SL at the authors' institution from 2008 to 2019 were reviewed. Using ANCOVA, changes in PROMs from baseline to the 2-year follow-up were compared between the two groups, adjusting for clinicodemographic parameters, baseline PROMs, number of decompressed levels, and MRI measurements (C2-7 Cobb angle, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis [SVA], and modified K-line interval [mK-line INT]). The PROMs, including the European Myelopathy Score (EMS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the EQ-5D, were collected from the national Swedish Spine Register. Complications, reoperations, and in-hospital treatment costs were also compared between the two groups. Ninety patients (mean age 60.7 years, 51 men [57%]) were included in the ADF group and 63 patients (mean age 68.8 years, 41 men [65%]) in the SL group. The ADF and SL groups had similar PROMs at baseline. The preoperative MR images showed similar C2-7 Cobb angles (10.7° [ADF] vs 14.1° [SL], p = 0.12) and mK-line INTs (4.08 vs 4.88 mm, p = 0.07), but different C2-7 SVA values (16.2 vs 19.3 mm, p = 0.04). The comparison of ANCOVA-adjusted mean changes in PROMs from baseline to the 2-year follow-up presented no significant differences between the groups (EMS, p = 0.901; NDI, p = 0.639; EQ-5D, p = 0.378; and EQ-5D health, p = 0.418). The overall complication rate was twice as high in the ADF group (22.2% vs 9.5%, p = 0.049), while the reoperation rate was comparable (16.7% vs 7.9%, p = 0.146). The average in-hospital treatment cost per patient was $6617 (USD) for SL, $7046 for ACDF, and $12,000 for ACCF. SL provides similar PROMs after 2 years, a significantly lower complication rate, and better cost-effectiveness compared with ADF.

Posterior Decompression and Fusion with Vertical Pressure Procedure in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical OPLL with Kyphotic Deformity.

ObjectiveTo report the outcomes and feasibility of a new technique to change K‐line (−) to K‐line (+) via only a posterior approach to treat multilevel non‐continuous cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (C‐OPLL) with kyphotic deformity.MethodsIn this study, 17 consecutive cases of patients who underwent vertical pressure procedure (VP) combined with posterior cervical single‐open‐door laminoplasty and instrumented fusion from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019 were enrolled. The following radiographic parameters: C2‐C7 Cobb angle, local Cobb angle, extent of OPLL, and the distance from OPLL to the K‐line(DK) were measured and analyzed. Clinically, the JOA score, VAS‐N and VAS‐A, NDI, and complications were collected from medical records to evaluate the clinical outcomes.ResultsAll 17 cases shifted from K‐line (−) to K‐line (+).Comparing the preoperative images to the final follow‐up images, the mean C2‐7 Cobb angle changed from −6.94° ± 8.30° to 8.18° ± 4.43°, and the local Cobb angle altered from −9.12° ± 8.68° to 6.65° ± 6.11°. The mean DK increased from −2.64 ± 1.52 mm to 3.09 ± 2.19 mm. One patient showed C5 palsy and recovered within 3 months. The mean JOA score increased from 8.88 ± 2.11 to 14.71 ± 1.36. The average NDI decreased from 20.65 ± 7.80 to 8.94 ± 4.93. The mean VAS‐N and VAS‐A decreased from 3.44 ± 1.80 and 4.69 ± 1.97 to 1.25 ± 0.86 and 1.38 ± 1.16. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year.ConclusionA new technique added to posterior decompression and fusion (PDF), the vertical pressure procedure effectively corrects K‐line (−) to K‐line (+) and avoids the shortcomings of conventional anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) as well as PDF to provide a relatively safe and adequate decompression, cervical realignment. It pronounced satisfactory clinical outcome for extensive non‐continuous OPLL with kyphotic deformity even though OPLL remains ventral to the spinal cord.

Predictors of good outcome after anterior decompression and fusion in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the thoracic spine

BackgroundThere are few reports concerning determinants of the surgical outcome of anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) when performed for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the thoracic spine (T-OPLL). We investigated prognostic factors associated with neurological recovery in the patients with T-OPLL. MethodsThis retrospective study included consecutive cases of T-OPLL patients from January 2002 to January 2020 and minimum one-year follow-up. Data were collected for sex, age, body mass index, preoperative manual muscle test score for the weakest muscle, surgical data, and preoperative and postoperative findings on radiographs, magnetic resonance images, and computed tomography scans. Imaging data were also collected, including preoperative kyphotic angles, canal occupancy ratio, type of OPLL, and high-intensity areas on T2-weighted images. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for thoracic myelopathy (T-JOA) was used to evaluate the recovery of the thoracic myelopathy. The patients were categorized according to whether the improvement in T-JOA score was >50% or ≤50%. ResultsForty-six patients who underwent anterior procedures for T-OPLL were included in the study. Preoperative and postoperative T-JOA scores were 4.2 ± 2.3 and 7.9 ± 2.1, respectively. The improvement in the T-JOA score was 54.5 ± 25.6%. The proportion of patients with beak-type OPLL was significantly higher in the >50% JOA improvement group (23/27) than in the ≤50% group (9/19) (p = 0.009) and the canal occupancy ratio was significantly lower in the >50% group (56.3 ± 12.2% vs 64.4 ± 8.73%; p = 0.0163). There were no significant between-group differences in other factors. ConclusionsBeak-type ossification and a low canal occupancy ratio are predictors of good outcome after ADF in patients with T-OPLL. ADF should be considered in patients with either or both of these features.

A pragmatic single centre retrospective comparative review of complication profile between PEEK cages and Zero-P cage screw constructs

Background Anterior Decompression and Fusion (ACDF) is a common surgery recommended for symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease after failed conservative care. There is no consensus on the choice of implants, and it varies between surgeons. This study aims to analyse the early complications following ACDF performed using a standalone cage versus a Zero-P (Cage Screw – (CS)) construct for patients with cervical degenerative disc disease. Methods A total of 162 patients underwent an ACDF between August 2016 and July 2018. There were 83 patients (111 cervical disc levels) with standalone cage (SA) and 79 patients (111 cervical disc levels) with cage-screw (CS) fixation. There was no difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, and levels of surgery. The follow-up ranged from 2 months to 24 months. Complications, both clinical and radiological, were assessed between the groups. Results Both the SA and Zero-P (CS) groups were subdivided into single and multilevel surgery. Complications encountered in the SA group were temporary swallowing problems 10, hoarseness of voice 3, cage migration 1, delayed union 1, Horner’s syndrome 1, cage subsidence 2. In the CS group swallowing problems 4, hoarseness of voice 4, CSF leak 1, recurrent symptoms 1. The observed difference in the incidence of complications between the groups did not reach statistical significance. Univariate analysis between the groups did not show any difference in the improvement of cervical sagittal balance, fusion rate, subsidence, and complications encountered. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for complications showed no difference between the groups when assessed for smoking, gender, age, Charlson comorbidity index, levels of surgery, fusion status, Odom score, or the type of implant. Conclusion In this short-term study, the standalone (SA) cages showed no difference in their complication profile in comparison to a cage-screw construct for both single and multilevel ACDF. Standalone cages might be a cost-effective option without increased complication risks. Nevertheless, we propose a longer-term follow-up with a prospective randomized trial for further evaluation of this finding.

Anterior C2-3 fusion surgery alone for highly displaced Hangman’s fracture with severe angulation of C2-3 of more than 30°

BackgroundHighly displaced Hangman’s fracture is a very rare and extremely unstable fracture of the C2 axis. Combined anteroposterior or posterior long-segment fusion surgery is typically performed for the treatment of highly displaced Hangman’s fracture. However, these kinds of surgeries increase the risk of complications, loss of motion, and hospital costs. ObjectiveWe sought to investigate the surgical outcomes of anterior C2-3 fusion surgery alone for highly displaced Hangman’s fractures with severe angulation of C2-3 by more than 30° and discoligamentous injury. MethodsA total of five patients (four men and one woman) were included in this study with a mean age of 40.4 years (range, 26–70 years). The mean follow-up period after surgery was 37.2 months (range, 12–96 months). The fracture characteristics, treatment methods, and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsAll five patients had type II Hangman’s fractures (according to the Levine and Edwards classification scheme). None of the included patients had neurologic deficit or other spine injury but all patients had complete C2-3 discoligamentous injury. Before surgery, all patients successfully achieved closed reduction by skull traction, followed by C2-3 anterior decompression and fusion (ACDF) with plating. For interbody grafting, three patients received a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with an autogenous cancellous iliac bone graft and two received autogenous tricortical iliac bone grafts. Severe angulation (39.2° vs. 3.0°, P < 0.001) and severe displacement (76.1% vs. 4.0%, P < 0.001) of C2-3 were both significantly corrected after surgery. All patients had achieved solid fusion at last follow-up. In terms of clinical outcomes, the mean neck pain visual analog scale score was significantly improved (8.6 points vs. 1.8 points, P < 0.001). The mean neck disability index value was also significantly improved (45.4 points vs. 13.0 points, P < 0.01). According to Odom’s criteria, all patients achieved satisfactory outcomes. No major complications occurred. One patient complained of dysphagia, but recovered after three months with conservative treatment. ConclusionsPreoperative closed reduction and anterior C2-3 fusion surgery alone should be considered as a less-invasive and useful surgical option for highly displaced Hangman’s fracture with severe angulation of C2-3, which is an extremely unstable fracture of the C2 axis.

Prognostic factors for neurological outcome after anterior decompression and fusion for proximal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy – A retrospective analysis of 77 cases

BackgroundDecompression through an anterior approach is theoretically effective for the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA), because the pathology usually locates at the anterior side. However, most previous studies investigated posterior surgery or a mix of anterior surgery and posterior surgery in their investigation. Only a few small case series have investigated the surgical outcomes of anterior decompression and fusion (ADF). Therefore, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study that included patients who underwent ADF for proximal-type CSA. MethodsWe analyzed the outcomes of 77 consecutive spinal surgeries performed on proximal-type CSA patients who underwent ADF. Preoperative and postoperative manual muscle tests (MMT) and the patients’ backgrounds, radiological findings, and complications were reviewed. We divided the cases into two groups, good-outcome group (MMT improvement ≧ 2 or improved to MMT 5) and poor-outcome group (others) and evaluated the prognostic factors for outcomes. ResultsOf the 77 patients, 48 (62%) showed good neurological outcome. Multiple compressive lesions at anterior horn (AH) and/or ventral nerve roots (VNRs) were detected in 66 patients (85.7%) on the magnetic resonance images. The patients with a single compressive lesion at VNR or AH tended to show good neurological recovery when compare to those with multiple lesions. Age and duration of symptoms were related to the poor outcome in univariate analysis. Duration of symptoms was an independent factor associated with postoperative neurological outcome. The cut-off value for poor outcome was 7.0 months for the symptom duration (sensitivity: 79%, specificity: 54%, area under the curve: 0.69). ConclusionsPatients with proximal-CSA were more likely to have multiple compressive lesions at an AH and/or a VNR. The prognostic factor for poor neurological outcome was duration of symptoms of ≥7 months.

Anterior Decompression and Fusion Versus Laminoplasty for Cervical Myelopathy Caused by Soft Disk Herniation: A Long-term Prospective Multicenter Study.

A prospective multicenter study. The purpose of this study was to determine whether laminoplasty (LP) is comparable for myelopathy caused by cervical disk herniation (CDH). Anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) has conventionally been used for myelopathy caused by CDH with stable outcomes. However, recurrence of myelopathy due to adjacent segment degeneration are its drawbacks. The efficacy of LP without discectomy has been sporadically reported, but no long-term prospective study has been conducted to verify it. Patients with cervical myelopathy caused by CDH were studied. The first 30 patients and the next 30 patients were treated with ADF and LP, respectively. The outcomes were compared between the 22 ADF patients and the 20 LP patients who had completed the follow-up examination scheduled 10 years after surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative severity or recovery rate of myelopathy between the 2 groups 10 years after surgery. One patient in the ADF group underwent LP for secondary myelopathy due to adjacent segment degeneration 2 years after the surgery. Reoperation was not required for patients in the LP group. Postoperative neck pain was significantly more severe in the LP group than in the ADF group. ADF and LP for cervical myelopathy caused by CDH achieve similarly favorable outcomes. Recurrence of myelopathy caused by adjacent segment degeneration is a disadvantage of ADF while residual neck pain is a disadvantage of LP.

Is Modified K-line a Powerful Tool of Surgical Decision Making for Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

Prospective observational single-center study. To evaluate anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) or posterior surgery (PS) for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) using the modified K-line (mK-line) and to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes between these 2 techniques. The authors have previously reported that insufficient posterior decompression is often seen after laminoplasty for CSM in patients with preoperative anterior clearance of the spinal cord <4 mm on the basis of the mK-line. However, to our knowledge, no study has investigated the role, if any, of the mK-line in surgical decision making for patients with CSM. A total of 87 patients were enrolled who underwent surgery for treatment of CSM between 2011 and 2015 at our hospital and who could be followed up for at least 2 years. ADF was selected as a more favorable procedure than PS in patients with anterior spinal clearance of <4 mm on preoperative midsagittal magnetic resonance imaging. On the basis of the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system for cervical myelopathy, the rate of recovery of the JOA scores at 2 years after surgery was investigated as a clinical outcome to compare these 2 groups. Mean age was 65.1 (±12.9) years in the ADF group (n=26) and 70.5 (±8.6) years in the PS group (n=61). In the PS group, 10 patients underwent posterior decompression with fusion. Mean preoperative and postoperative JOA scores were 10.5 and 14.1 points in the ADF group and 9.8 and 13.1 points in the PS group, respectively, showing no significant difference in recovery rate of JOA score between the ADF (58.9%) and PS (47.1%) groups. However, patients with a minimum interval between the mK-line and the anterior compression factor on the midsagittal image (minimum interval of the spinal cord) <4 mm tended to have unsatisfactory outcomes (recovery rate 29.6%) compared with patients with minimum interval of the spinal cord >4 mm (53.6%, P=0.07) in the PS group. Preoperative intervention using the mK-line is useful to predict residual cord compression and might homogenize postoperative clinical outcomes in both anterior surgery and PS.

The Clinical Implications and Complications of Anterior Versus Posterior Surgery for Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament; An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ObjectiveTheoretically, the optimal approach is determined by the status of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and sagittal alignment. However, there have long been disputes about the optimum surgical approach of OPLL. This study is to compare risk-effectiveness between anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty and laminectomy with fusion (LP/LF) for the patient with cervical myelopathy due to multilevel cervical OPLL. MethodsWe searched core databases, and compared complication and outcomes between ADF and LP/LF for patients with multiple OPLL for the cervical spine. The incidence of complications such as neurologic deterioration, C5 palsy, and dura tear was assessed. Changes in JOA score between baseline and final evaluations were assessed for 2 groups. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was utilized for evaluating clinical significance. We calculated Peto odds ratio (POR) and mean difference for the incidence and continuous variables, respectively. ResultsWe included data from 21 articles involving 3,872 patients with cervical myelopathy with OPLL. Major neurologic deficits such as paraplegia, quadriplegia developed 2.17% in the ADF group and 1.11% in the LP/LF group, and POR was 2.16. Mean difference of JOA score improvement of 2 groups was 1.30, and the mean difference showed a statistical significance. However, 1.3 points of JOA improvement cannot reach 2.5 points of the MCID. ConclusionAnterior surgery often led to rare but critical complications, and the difference of neurological improvement between 2 groups was below a clinically meaningful level. Posterior surgeries may be appropriate in the treatment of multilevel cervical myelopathy with OPLL.

Surgical Tactics to Cervical Myelopathy and Radiculopathy

There are 2 ways to approach the cervical spine, the anterior approach and the posterior approach. When conservative treatments fail, surgical management is brought to the table. The key issues to determine the approach include good outcome, less axial pain, and preservation of the motion. Minimally invasive techniques can provide good outcome with fewer complications. Anterior decompression and fusion (ACDF) is the gold standard technique since 1950s, and ACDF is now performed under the microscope. Skin-fold incision, longitudinal dissection of the platysma and gentle retraction of the trachea, esophagus, as well as vessels, expose the anterior surface of the vertebral bodies. After satisfactory decompression, the interbody fusion is performed.Key-hole discectomy is less-invasive procedure without metal fixation. This unique procedure is indicated to the unilateral radiculopathy in young patients. As for posterior approach, a conventional laminectomy is just destructive with delayed kyphosis. In order to reduce this serious complication, laminoplasty has been performed particularly in Japan since the 1980s. There are open-door and double-door laminoplasty in this technique, and the decision is made mainly by surgeons’ preference. Laminoplasty is good for multi-level spondylosis and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). The spacer for this approach consists of metal in most cases. Percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (PECF) is chosen in cases of unilateral radiculopathy.In this presentation, various surgical techniques to the cervical degenerative disease are shown with advantages and pitfalls and the importance of minimally invasive surgery is stressed, based on my clinical experience.

Surgical Tactics to Cervical Myelopathy and Radiculopathy

There are 2 ways to approach the cervical spine, the anterior approach and the posterior approach. When conservative treatments fail, surgical management is brought to the table. The key issues to determine the approach include good outcome, less axial pain, and preservation of the motion. Minimally invasive techniques can provide good outcome with fewer complications. Anterior decompression and fusion (ACDF) is the gold standard technique since 1950s, and ACDF is now performed under the microscope. Skin-fold incision, longitudinal dissection of the platysma and gentle retraction of the trachea, esophagus, as well as vessels, expose the anterior surface of the vertebral bodies. After satisfactory decompression, the interbody fusion is performed.Key-hole discectomy is less-invasive procedure without metal fixation. This unique procedure is indicated to the unilateral radiculopathy in young patients. As for posterior approach, a conventional laminectomy is just destructive with delayed kyphosis. In order to reduce this serious complication, laminoplasty has been performed particularly in Japan since the 1980s. There are open-door and double-door laminoplasty in this technique, and the decision is made mainly by surgeons’ preference. Laminoplasty is good for multi-level spondylosis and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). The spacer for this approach consists of metal in most cases. Percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (PECF) is chosen in cases of unilateral radiculopathy.In this presentation, various surgical techniques to the cervical degenerative disease are shown with advantages and pitfalls and the importance of minimally invasive surgery is stressed, based on my clinical experience.

Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy for treatment of radiculopathy : An effective, time-tested, and cost-efficient motion-preservation technique.

To relieve foraminal root impingement due to lateral soft disc fragments, bony spurs, or other rarer causes. Soft disc fragment whose bulk is>2/3lateral to the lateral border of the thecal sac. Intraforaminal dorsal bony narrowing of the root canal. Intraforaminal synovial cyst, extra/intradural tumor. Paramedian and median soft/hard disc protrusions. Kyphosis of the index level. Patient prone in reverse Trendelenburg position with the head fixed in aMayfield clamp. Cervical spine horizontal and approximately 10 cm above the heart. Microscope from skin to skin. Skin incision: 25 mm, about 10 mm off the midline. Microsurgical blunt splitting of the muscle layers along the fiber direction. An expandable tubular retractor or aminiaturized speculum counter retractor, table anchored, is centered on the target lamino-facet junction as confirmed by fluoroscopy. Drilling of the keyhole. The axilla of the root is exposed while preserving most of the facet complex. Epidural exploration until an extruded or subligamentous disc fragment(s) is removed. If needed, removal of the dorsal bone overlying the root exiting in the foramen. The adequacy of decompression is assessed by palpating the root along its course with asmall nerve hook. Closure by layers. No drain. Same day mobilization. No external brace. Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF) was used to treat 103patients for unilateral cervical radiculopathy. Mean follow-up was 32months. Despite 1cerebrospinal fluid leak, 1wound hematoma, and 1radiculitis during the early postoperative period, no patients required revision surgery. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck/shoulder and arm improved significantly in the early postoperative period (3months) and were maintained with time (p< 0.001). Neck Disability Index (NDI) improved significantly postoperatively but worsened slightly during follow-up (p< 0.001). Anterior decompression and fusion (ACDF) was required at the index level by 3patients (mean: 55months later) and at the adjacent level by 4patients (mean: 27months later).

Comparison of anterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PurposeA meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes, complications, reoperation rates, and late neurological deterioration between anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP) in the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).MethodsAll related studies published up to August 2015 were acquired by searching PubMed and EMBASE. Exclusion criteria were case reports, revision surgeries, combined anterior and posterior surgeries, the other posterior approaches including laminectomy or laminectomy and instrumented fusion, non-English studies, and studies with quality assessment scores of <7. The main end points including Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, recovery rate of JOA, cervical lordosis, complication rate, reoperation rate, and late neurological deterioration were analyzed. All available data was analyzed using RevMan 5.2.0 and Stata 12.0.ResultsA total of seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The mean surgical level of ADF was 3.1, and the mean preoperative occupation ratios of ADF and LAMP group were 55.9% and 51.9%, respectively. No statistical difference was observed with regard to preoperative occupation ratio and preoperative JOA score. Although LAMP group had a higher preoperative cervical lordosis than ADF group (P<0.05, weighted mean difference [WMD] =−5.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] =−9.67–−1.80), significantly decreased cervical lordosis was observed in LAMP group after operation. ADF group had higher postoperative JOA score (P<0.05, WMD =2.18, 95% CI =0.98–3.38) and neurological recovery rate (P<0.05, WMD =27.22, 95% CI =15.20–39.23). Furthermore, ADF group had a lower late neurological deterioration rate than the LAMP group (P<0.05, risk difference =0.16, 95% CI =0.04–0.73). The complication rates of both groups had no statistical difference. However, LAMP group had a significantly lower reoperation rate than ADF group. The reoperation rate of ADF group (20.5%) was almost six times that of LAMP group (3.5%).ConclusionOur meta-analysis suggested that ADF was associated with better postoperative neurological function, neurological recovery rate, and less late neurological deterioration than LAMP in the treatment of multilevel cervical OPLL with a high mean occupation ratio. LAMP was associated with a decreased postoperative cervical lordosis, which might be a cause of late neurological deterioration. The complication rates of both groups showed no statistical difference. However, the reoperation rate was significantly higher in ADF group compared with LAMP group. Benefits and risks should be balanced when ADF or LAMP is selected.

Anterior Decompression and Fusion Versus Posterior Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Compressive Myelopathy

The optimal surgical strategy for anterior or posterior approaches remains controversial for multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy caused by multisegment cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted evaluating the clinical results of anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) compared with posterior laminoplasty for patients with multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized cohort studies conducted from 1990 to May 2013 comparing ADF with posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy due to MCSM or OPLL. The following outcome measures were extracted: Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, recovery rate, complication rate, reoperation rate, blood loss, and operative time. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the mean number of surgical segments. Eleven studies were included in the review, all of which were prospective or retrospective cohort studies with relatively low quality indicated by GRADE Working Group assessment. A definitive conclusion could not be reached regarding which surgical approach is more effective for the treatment of multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy. Although ADF was associated with better postoperative neural function than posterior laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy due to MCSM or OPLL, there was no apparent difference in the neural function recovery rate between the 2 approaches. Higher rates of surgery-related complication and reoperation should be taken into consideration when ADF is used for patients with multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy. The surgical trauma associated with corpectomy was significantly higher than that associated with posterior laminoplasty.

Middle-Term Results of a Prospective Comparative Study of Anterior Decompression With Fusion and Posterior Decompression With Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

A clinical prospective study. To assess whether clinical and radiologic outcomes differ between anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP) in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). No reports to date have accurately and prospectively compared middle-term clinical outcomes after anterior and posterior decompression for CSM. We prospectively performed LAMP (n = 50) in 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002, and ADF (n = 45) in 1997, 1999, 2001, and 2003. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, recovery rate, and each item of the JOA score were evaluated. For radiographic evaluation, the lordotic angle and range of motion (ROM) at C2-C7 and residual anterior compression to the spinal cord (ACS) after LAMP on magnetic resonance imaging were investigated. Eighty-six patients (ADF n = 39; LAMP n = 47) could be followed for more than 5 years (follow-up rate 91.5%). Demographics were similar between the two groups. The mean JOA score and recovery rate in the ADF group were superior to those in the LAMP group from 2-year data collected after surgery. However, LAMP was safer and less invasive than ADF with respect to physical status and complications in the perioperative period. For individual items of the JOA score, the ADF group showed significantly more improvement of upper extremity motor function than the LAMP group (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in maintenance of the lordotic angle in the ADF group compared with the LAMP group despite no difference in ROM.The LAMP group was divided into two subgroups: (1) LAMP(+) (n = 16) comprising patients who had ACS at 2 years after surgery, and (2) LAMP(-) (n = 31) comprising patients without ACS. Recovery rate differed significantly between the LAMP(+) and LAMP(-) groups despite there being no difference between the LAMP(-) and ADF groups. The recovery rate of the JOA score in the ADF group was better than that in the LAMP group. The clinical outcomes after LAMP could be influenced by ACS.

Surgical Strategy for Cervical Myelopathy due to Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

Retrospective study of 27 patients who underwent anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) for treatment of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). To compare surgical outcome of ADF with that of laminoplasty. During the period 1986 and 1996, laminoplasty was the only surgical treatment selected for cervical myelopathy at our institutions. According to surgical results of laminoplasty performed during this period, we have performed either laminoplasty or ADF for patients with OPLL since 1996. We reviewed clinical data obtained in 27 patients who underwent ADF between 1996 and 2003. Mean duration of follow-up was 6.0 years (range, 2-10 years). Surgical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system for cervical myelopathy. Surgical results of ADF were compared with those of laminoplasty, which was performed in 66 patients during the period 1986 and 1996. ADF yielded a better neurologic outcome at final follow-up than laminoplasty in patients with occupying ratio > or =60%, although graft complications occurred in 15% and additional surgical intervention was required in 26%. Neither occupying ratio of OPLL, sagittal shape of ossification, nor cervical alignment was found to be related to surgical outcome of ADF. Although ADF is technically demanding and has a higher incidence of surgery-related complications, it is preferable to laminoplasty for patients with occupying ratio of OPLL > or =60%.