Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rerupture Research Articles

Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients with Associated Anterolateral Ligament Injury.

Objective To evaluate if there is a significant difference in the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients with or without associated anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury. Methods We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study through the analysis of medical records and the application of the questionnaires of the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form to patients undergoing isolated ACL reconstruction. Results The 52 participants included were divided into two groups: 19 with associated ALL injury and 33 with no associated ALL injury. None of the patients with associated ALL injury suffered an ACL rerupture, and 21.1% presented injuries to other knee structures after surgery. Among the patients with no associated injury, 6.1% suffered ACL rerupture, and 18.2% presented injuries to other structures after surgery ( p = 0.544). Return to activities at the same level as that of the preoperative period occurred in 60% of the patients with associated ALL injury and in 72% of those with no associated injury ( p = 0.309). The mean score on the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale was of 81.6 points in patients with associated ALL injury, and of 90.1 in those with no associated injury ( p = 0.032). The mean score on the IKDC Subjective Knee Form was of 70.3 points in patients with associated ALL injury and of 76.7 in those with no associated injury ( p = 0.112). Conclusion There was no statistically significant difference regarding graft injuries or new injuries to other structures, satisfaction with the operated knee, or the score on the IKDC Subjective Knee Form. Return to activity was similar in the groups with and without associated ALL injuries. The scores on the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale were better, with a statistically significant difference in the group with no associated ALL injuries.

The relationship between lateral femoral condyle ratio measured by MRI and anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Previous studies have shown that the lateral femoral condyle ratio (LFCR) measured by X-ray has a significant relationship with the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. However, few relevant studies have been performed on LFCR measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). (1) To evaluate the relationship between LFCR measured by MRI and ACL injury or rerupture. (2) To compare the LFCR measured by MRI with existing bony morphological risk factors and screen out the most predictive risk factors for primary ACL injury or rerupture. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Totally 147 patients who underwent knee arthroscopic surgery from 2015 to 2019 with minimum follow-up of 48months were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were placed into three groups: 1) the control group of patients with simple meniscus tears without ligament injury; 2) the primary noncontact ACL injury group; 3) ACL rerupture group (ACL reconstruction failure). The LFCR measured by MRI and other previous known risk factors associated with MRI (notch width index, medial tibial slope, lateral tibial slope, medial tibial depth, lateral tibial height) were performed to evaluate their predictive value for ACL injury and rerupture. All the risk factors with p < 0.01 according to univariate analysis were included in the logistic regression models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, cut-off, and area under the curve (AUC). Z tests were used to compare the AUC values. The LFCR measured by MRI was obviously higher in primary ACL injury group (0.628 ± 0.020) and in ACL rerupture group (0.625 ± 0.021) than that in the control group (0.593 ± 0.030). The best risk factor was the LFCR with a cut-off of 0.602 (AUC, 0.818; 95% CI, 0.748-0.878; sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 66%). When combined with lateral tibial slope (cutoff, 7°) and lateral tibial height (cutoff, 3.6mm), the diagnostic performance was improved significantly (AUC, 0.896; 95% CI, 0.890-0.950; sensitivity, 87%; specificity, 80%). The increased LFCR measured by MRI was associated with a significantly higher risk for ACL injury or rerupture. The combination of LFCR, lateral tibial slope and lateral tibial height were the most predictive risk factors. This may help clinicians identify susceptible individuals and allow precision approaches for better prevention, treatment and management of this disease.

All-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a prospective study.

There is no clear consensus regarding the superiority of a combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) versus an isolated ACLR. In this study, we compared the postoperative stability profile, complications, and patient-reported outcomes of these procedures. Twenty-one patients with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear who were either treated by an isolated all-inside ACLR (n = 21) or a combined all-inside ACLR and ALLR (n = 20) were included. The outcomes were evaluated in the last follow-up and included the postoperative stability profile evaluated by the Lachman test, pivot shift test, and KT-1000 side-to-side difference, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcomes evaluated by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Lysholm knee scale. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different. The residual Lachman and pivot shift were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.41 and P = 0.18, respectively). The mean KT-1000 side-to-side difference was 1.93 ± 1.9mm in the isolated and 1.635 ± 0.91mm in the combined group (P = 0.01). The mean improvement of the IKDC score was not significantly different between the isolated and combined groups (24.7 vs. 25.2, P = 0.28). The mean improvement of the Lysholm scale was not significantly different between the isolated and combined groups (33.5 vs. 34.1, P = 0.19). ACL re-rupture occurred in three patients of the isolated group and no patient of the combined group. The outcomes of patients in the present study support performing a combined ALL and ACL reconstruction.

Reduction in re-rupture rates following implementation of return-to-sport testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in 313 patients with a mean follow-up of 50 months

Objectives:The objective of this study was to assess the mid-term effectiveness of a return to sport (RTS) test in relation to preventing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) re-rupture and contralateral ACL injury following ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Furthermore, this study aimed to assess the timing of passing a, RTS-test after surgery, and the effect age has on RTS outcomes. Methods:Patients undergoing ACLR between August 2014 and December 2018 took an RTS-test following rehabilitation. The RTS-test consisted of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury Scale, a single-leg hop, a single-leg triple hop, a single-leg triple cross-over hop, a box-drop vertical jump down, a single-leg 4-rep max-incline leg press, and a modified agility T test. RTS-passing criteria were ≥90% limb symmetry index in addition to defined takeoff and landing parameters. Mid-term review assessed sporting level, ACL re-injury, and contralateral ACL injury. ResultsA total of 352 patients underwent RTS-testing, following ACLR with 313 (89%) contactable at follow-up, a mean of 50 months (standard deviation: 11.41, range: 28–76) after surgery. The re-rupture rate was 6.6% after passing the RTS-test and 10.3% following failure (p ​= ​0.24), representing a 36% reduction. Contralateral ACL injury rate after surgery was 6% and was 19% lower in those passing the RTS test. The mean age of patients passing their first RTS-test was significantly higher than that of those who failed (p ​= ​0.0027). Re-ruptures in those who passed the RTS test first time occurred late (>34 months), compared to those who failed first time, which all occurred early (<33 months) (p ​= ​0.0015). The mean age of re-rupture was significantly less than those who did not sustain a re-rupture (p ​= ​0.025). Conclusion:Passing a RTS-test following ACLR reduces ACL re-rupture by 36.21% and contralateral ACL injury by 19.15% at mid-term follow-up. Younger patients are more likely to fail a RTS-test and are at higher risk of contralateral ACL rupture.Level III Evidence.

Increased Lateral Femoral Condyle Ratio Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Associated With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rerupture

To investigate the association between lateral femoral condyle ratio (LFCR) measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rerupture after anatomic ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and to compare the diagnostic accuracy between MRI and radiograph measurements. A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent anatomic ACLR in our institution between 2015 and 2018. Patients who experienced rerupture after ACLR were identified and matched 1:1 with control patients who showed no evidence of graft failure during a minimum 48-month follow-up. The matching criteria included age, sex, and body mass index. LFCR was measured on MRI scans and radiographs of the affected limb. Patients' characteristics, surgical features, and anatomic measurements were compared between groups. Conditional logistic regression was performed to investigate whether MRI-measured LFCR is a risk factor for ACL rerupture. The optimal cutoff value was determined by receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). Delong's test was performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy between MRI and radiograph measurements. A total of 72 patients who sustained ACL rerupture were included and matched with 72 control subjects. Compared to patients with intact ACLR, those who sustained ACL rerupture showed a significant increase in LFCR on MRI scans (63.38% ± 2.26% [95% CI, 62.84%-63.91%] vs 61.10% ± 2.19% [95% CI, 60.59%-61.61%], P < .001). An MRI-measured LFCR >62.18% was set as the cutoff point to discern patients at a higher risk of graft failure after anatomic ACLR, with sensitivity and specificity of 75.0% and 70.8%, respectively. MRI-measured LFCR demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy during ROC curve analysis, achieving a higher area under the curve compared to radiograph-measured LFCR (0.783 ± 0.051 vs 0.668 ± 0.060, P= .041). The study found that MRI-measured LFCR was associated with ACL rerupture. A cutoff value of 62.18% was determined, which can help identify patients at a higher risk of rerupture. Level III, retrospective comparative study.

A New Algorithm to Treat Chronic Combined ACL/MCL Injuries: Let's Come Back to the “Rotatory Instability Test”

Background: Chronic combined medial collateral ligament (MCL) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are frequent. Medial residual laxity is a risk factor for ACL rerupture. It should be treated at the same time as the ACL reconstruction (ACLR) if necessary, but there are still questions surrounding the indications for abstention or surgery of the medial plan, especially for grade 2 MCL injuries of the Fetto and Marshall classification. Indications: The purpose is to come back to a simple test, the “Rotatory Instability Test” as described by Slocum and Larson in 1968 for systematic clinical examination of the knee to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of the deep MCL (dMCL) and superficial MCL (sMCL) examination and to propose a decision-making algorithm for the treatment of the chronic combined ACL/MCL injuries based on the assessment of anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI). Technique Description: Examination of the ACL with Lachman test, anterior drawer in neutral rotation, and pivot shift test confirm the ACL injury. Valgus laxity is tested in extension and at 20° of flexion. Then, an anterior drawer test at 90° of flexion with external rotation is done (the anterior drawer in external rotation [ADER] test) allowing to identify isolated dMCL, dMCL + sMCL, or MCL + posterior oblique ligament (POL) injuries. Discussion: As persistent medial laxity is a risk factor for ACL graft failure and there is no reliable method of instrumented laxity assessment, careful clinical examination remains essential. Systematic examination of the medial side with valgus laxity testing at 0° and 20° flexion combined with the ADER test assessment of AMRI can guide treatment of the MCL injury component. Where there is no valgus laxity and the ADER test is negative, isolated ACLR is indicated. If there is significant medial laxity at 0°, this suggests combining sMCL and POL reconstruction with ACLR. Where the knee is stable at 0° but there is valgus laxity at 20° and a positive ADER test, the dMCL can be reconstructed using a gracilis graft or a combined sMCL and dMCL reconstruction can be added to the ACLR depending on the degree of laxity. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

The Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptom State, and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Analysis From the SANTI Study Group

Background: There has been increasing interest in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair because of theoretical advantages over ACL reconstruction; however, the contemporary literature has failed to provide high-quality evidence to demonstrate these advantages. Purpose: To compare the clinical and functional outcomes of ACL repair versus ACL reconstruction at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent ACL repair were propensity matched (based on demographics, time between injury and surgery, knee laxity parameters, presence of meniscal lesions, preoperative activity level, and sport participation), in a 1:1 ratio, to those who underwent ACL reconstruction during the same period. Isokinetic testing was used to evaluate strength deficits at 6 months postoperatively. Knee laxity parameters were evaluated at 12 months. Complications, return to sport, and patient-reported outcome scores were recorded at final follow-up. Results: In total, 75 matched pairs (150 patients) were evaluated. The repair group had significantly better mean hamstring muscle strength at 6 months compared with the reconstruction group (1.7% ± 12.2% vs −10.0% ± 12.8%, respectively; P < .0001). At a mean final follow-up of 30.0 ± 4.8 months, the repair group had a significantly better mean Forgotten Joint Score–12 (FJS-12) score compared with the reconstruction group (82.0 ± 15.1 vs 74.2 ± 21.7, respectively; P = .017). Noninferiority criteria were met for ACL repair, compared with ACL reconstruction, with respect to the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score (86.8 ± 9.0 vs 86.7 ± 10.1, respectively; P < .0001) and side-to-side anteroposterior laxity difference (1.1 ± 1.4 vs 0.6 ± 1.0 mm, respectively; P < .0001). No significant differences were found for other functional outcomes or the pivot-shift grade. There were no significant differences in the rate of return to the preinjury level of sport (repair group: 74.7%; reconstruction group: 60.0%; P = .078). A significant difference was observed regarding the occurrence of ACL reruptures (repair group: 5.3%; reconstruction group: 0.0%; P = .045). Patients who experienced a failure of ACL repair were significantly younger than those who did not (26.8 vs 40.7 years, respectively; P = .013). There was no significant difference in rupture rates between the repair and reconstruction groups when only patients aged >21 years were considered (2.9% vs 0.0%, respectively; P = .157). The minimal clinically important difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds were defined for the ACL repair group. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the repair group achieved the PASS for the FJS-12 compared with their counterparts in the reconstruction group (77.3% vs 60.0%, respectively; P = .034). Conclusion: ACL repair was associated with some advantages over ACL reconstruction including superior hamstring muscle strength at 6 months and significantly better FJS-12 scores. However, the failure rate was significantly higher after ACL repair, and younger patients were particularly at risk.

Anatomic Factors Associated With the Development of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rerupture in Men: A Case-Control Study

Background: Although several factors are associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rerupture, the effect of anatomic factors associated with ACL rupture on ACL rerupture development has not been evaluated. Purpose: To determine individual anatomic parameters independently associated with ACL rerupture and the diagnostic values of these parameters. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 91 male patients with ACL rerupture and 182 age-, sex-, body mass index–, and side dominance–matched patients without rerupture who underwent ACL reconstruction with a 5-year follow-up were included. In all, 35 parameters that were previously defined as risk factors for primary ACL rupture were compared between the 2 groups. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression models were created to evaluate independently associated factors. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for independently associated parameters to predict sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff values. Results: The mean ± standard deviation age of patients at the time of index surgery was 26.5 ± 6.7 years. Notch shape index (P = .014), tibial proximal anteroposterior (AP) distance (TPAPD) (P < .001), lateral femoral condylar AP distance (LCAPD)/TPAPD ratio (P < .001), medial meniscal cartilage bone height (P < .001), and lateral meniscal bone angle (P = .004) were found to be significantly different between the 2 groups. Only the LCAPD/TPAPD ratio (odds ratio, 2.713; 95% CI, 1.998-5.480; P < .001) was found to be independently associated with ACL rerupture development. The LCAPD/TPAPD ratio revealed 78.9% sensitivity and 75.5% specificity (area under the curve, 0.815; 95% CI, 0.760-0.870) for values above 1.52. Conclusion: The LCAPD/TPAPD ratio can be used to distinguish patients who are at risk of developing ACL rerupture from patients who are not. In the clinical practice, findings of this study may help to develop surgical and nonsurgical preventive strategies in ACL rerupture development.

‘I was young, I wanted to return to sport, and re-ruptured my ACL’ – young active female patients’ voices on the experience of sustaining an ACL re-rupture, a qualitative study

BackgroundDespite anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) re-ruptures being common, research on patient experiences after knee trauma has primarily focused on the time after primary ACL reconstruction. Integrating qualitative research and patient experiences can facilitate researchers and clinicians in understanding the burden of an ACL re-rupture. The aim of the study was to explore the experiences of an ACL re-rupture journey in young active females aiming to return to knee-strenuous sports after primary ACL reconstruction.MethodFifteen young (19[range 16–23] years old) active females who suffered an ACL re-rupture were interviewed with semi-structured interviews. Qualitative content analysis using deductive approach based on Wiese-Bjornstal’s ‘integrated model of response to sport injury’ was used.ResultsThe results are presented in two timelines 1) from first ACL injury to ACL re-rupture, and 2) from ACL re-rupture to present day, and further stratified according to the domains of the ‘integrated model of psychological response to injury’. Results in the first timeline are summarised into seven categories: Finding hope for the journey; Accepting my ACL injury; I succeeded; What matters now? Who am I?; Where will this end? What is going to happen? In the second timeline, eight categories were identified: Fighting spirit; A helping hand; Working hard; I am a new me; I am destroyed; Loneliness; Painful changes; and, I could have made it to the pro´s.ConclusionYoung active females who suffered an ACL re-rupture did not express any positive experience following their first ACL injury, however, in contrast, expressed positive experiences and personal growth after going through the ACL re-rupture journey, characterized by a lot of struggling, and ultimately led to the experience of becoming a new, stronger person.

Comparison of Rotatory and Sagittal Laxity After Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction: Outcomes at 7-Year Follow-up.

Background:Biomechanical studies have shown excellent anteroposterior and rotatory laxity control after double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but no clinical studies have compared midterm (>5-year) residual laxity between the DB and single-bundle (SB) techniques.Purpose:To clinically compare sagittal and rotatory laxities and residual sagittal laxity on the KT-1000 arthrometer between patients treated with an SB ACL reconstruction and those treated with a DB ACL reconstruction at the 7-year follow-up.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A total of 110 patients were included between January 2006 and December 2007. The patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: those treated with SB ACL reconstruction (n = 63) and those treated with the DB technique (n = 47). All patients were then reviewed at a minimum of 7 years of follow-up; patients with ACL rerupture (n = 3 in the SB group and n = 2 in the DB group) were excluded from the postoperative comparative analysis. Residual anterior laxity (Lachman test), rotatory laxity (pivot-shift test), and sagittal laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference) were measured and compared between the 2 groups.Results:The mean age at surgery was 23.0 ± 5.1 years for the DB group and 28.1 ± 7.0 years for the SB group, and the mean follow-up was 7.4 ± 0.8 years. No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of age, sex, preoperative laxity on KT-1000, preoperative Tegner score, or concomitant meniscal lesions. Residual postoperative laxity via Lachman testing (P < .01), pivot-shift testing (P = .042), and the KT-1000 arthrometer (P < .01) was statistically significantly in favor of DB reconstruction.Conclusion:DB ACL reconstruction allowed better control of anterior stability during the evaluation via the Lachman test and via objective measurement on the KT-1000, as well as rotatory stability at a minimum of 7 years of follow-up.

Laxity measurement of internal knee rotation after primary anterior cruciate ligament rupture versus rerupture

PurposeThe aim of the current study was to objectify the rotational laxity after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and rerupture after ACL reconstruction by instrumented measurement. It was hypothesized that knees with recurrent instability feature a higher internal rotation laxity as compared to knees with a primary rupture of the native ACL.Study designCross-sectional study, Level of evidence III.MethodsIn a clinical cross-sectional study successive patients with primary ACL rupture and rerupture after ACL reconstruction were evaluated clinically and by instrumented measurement of the rotational and antero-posterior laxity with a validated instrument and the KT1000®, respectively. Clinical examination comprised IKDC 2000 forms, Lysholm Score, and Tegner Activity Scale. Power calculation and statistical analysis were performed (p value < 0.05).Results24 patients with primary ACL rupture and 23 patients with ACL rerupture were included. There was no significant side-to-side difference in anterior translation. A side-to side difference of internal rotational laxity ≥ 10° was found significantly more frequent in reruptures (53.6%) compared to primary ruptures (19.4%; p < 0.001). A highly significant relationship between the extent of the pivot-shift phenomenon and side-to-side difference of internal rotation laxity could be demonstrated (p < 0.001). IKDC 2000 subjective revealed significantly better scores in patients with primary ACL tear compared to patients with ACL rerupture (56.4 ± 7.8 vs. 50.8 ± 6.2; p = 0.01). Patients with primary ACL tears scored significantly better on the Tegner Activity Scale (p = 0.02). No significant differences were seen in the Lysholm Score (p = 0.78).ConclusionPatients with ACL rerupture feature significantly higher internal rotation laxity of the knee compared to primary ACL rupture. The extend of rotational laxity can be quantified by instrumented measurements. This can be valuable data for the indication of an anterolateral ligament reconstruction in ACL revision surgery.

Comparison of Bone-Patella Tendon-Bone and Four-Strand Hamstring Tendon Grafts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Study.

IntroductionTo date, the proper choice of graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains a matter of conflict. We aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of the two most commonly utilized autografts, bone-patella tendon-bone (BPTB) and four-strand hamstring tendon (HT) graft, at 6 and 12 months after surgery.MethodsIn a prospective randomized study, we included a total of 60 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction, thirty in BPTB and thirty in HT group. All patients were amateur athletes and were evaluated at 6 and12 months after surgery for: (a)postoperativefunctionality of the operated knee by the Tegner, the Lysholm and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scoring scales, (b) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) instability of the operated knee compared to the healthy contralateral knee by the KT-1000 arthrometer and (c) theextension and flexion muscle strength of the operated knee by a CYBEXisokinetic dynamometer. ResultsPatients in the two groups did not differ regarding demographics, and pre-injury functionality status. Significantly more patients in the HT group (n=6) compared to the BPTB group (n=1) experienced ACL re-rupture and underwent revision surgery before follow-up end (p=0.044). All patients, regardless of graft, showed significant improvement within each group of functional assessments by Lysholm, Tegner and IKDC scores, as well as of Cybex measurements -with an increase of peak torque at 60° extension and 180°extension and 60° flexion and 180° flexion- at 12 months compared to 6 months follow-up (p<0.05). However, there was no difference between the two groups regarding knee function improvement or extension measurements neither at 6 nor 12 months. Contrarily, the BPTB graft group had higher values of peak torque (Nm) at 60° and 180° flexion compared to the HT group, both at 6 (p=0.014 and 0.029, respectively) and 12 months (p=0.033 and 0.030, respectively). Postoperative stability was similar between the two groups at 12 months (p=0.519).ConclusionBoth BPTB and HT grafts present with benefits and drawbacks and remain viable autograft options for primary ACL reconstruction as each has, although HT grafts seem to be more susceptible to re-rupture. The graft selection should be based on the needs and activities of each patient.

Greater Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport, as Well as Greater Present and Future Knee-Related Self-Efficacy, Can Increase the Risk for an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Re-Rupture: A Matched Cohort Study

To determine the psychological characteristics and strength outcomes of patients who sustained an early anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) re-rupture after their primary ACL reconstruction and cross-sectionally compare them with a matched cohort of patients who did not sustain a reinjury during the first 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction. In this matched cohort study, data for quadriceps and hamstring strength and 3 hop tests and answers to standardized patient-reported outcomes (the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury scale and a short version of the Knee Self-Efficacy Scale) were extracted from a rehabilitation outcome registry. Data for patients suffering a re-rupture were extracted, and patients were matched in terms of sex, age, and activity level with patients not suffering an ACL re-rupture within 2 years of primary reconstruction. The groups were compared 10 weeks and 4, 8, and 12 months after the primary reconstruction. A total of 36 patients suffering an ACL re-rupture were matched with 108 patients not suffering a re-rupture after ACL reconstruction. Patients who suffered an ACL re-rupture had greater psychological readiness, that is, greater confidence in performance, lesser negative emotions, and lesser risk appraisal, to return to sport (RTS) at 8 months (81.2 vs 67.9 [95% Δconfidence interval {CI} 2.7-23.8) P= .014) and at 12 months (95.2 vs 67.1, (95% ΔCI 14.3-41.8) P ≤ .001), and greater knee-related self-efficacy at 8 months (8.6 vs 8.0 [95% ΔCI 0.1-1.2], P= .021) and 12 months (9.4 vs 8.1, [95% ΔCI 0.3-2.2] P= .012) after primary ACL reconstruction, compared with the matched group. A stronger psychological profile, defined by a greater psychological readiness to RTS and knee-related self-efficacy, may be associated with an ACL re-rupture within 2 years of the primary reconstruction. Matched cohort study, level III.

Self-Tensioning Feature of Knotless Suture Anchor Provides Reproducible Knotless Fixation Independent of Initial Tension.

Background:Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with suture tape reinforcement has been shown to biomechanically reduce elongation and increase ultimate strength. However, the amount and consistency of the achieved tension after primary fixation using knotless suture anchors remains unclear.Purpose:To determine whether initial tensioning of suture tape before fixation with a knotless suture anchor significantly affects final tension of the suture tape.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:We secured 15 pairs of Sawbones blocks with predrilled tunnels to a tensile testing machine. Suture tape was inserted through a suspensory fixation button on the representative femoral block and threaded top-down through the base of the tibial block over an attachable button system. The suture tape was attached with a knotless suture anchor in a predrilled and tapped hole on the tibial block under the following pretensioning conditions: (1) slight tension of 5 N, (2) no tension, and (3) initial slack. The suture anchor was inserted as the load-time data were recorded. After initial block testing, a porcine model of 24 tibias was used to test the same pretensioning conditions. The initial loads during anchor insertion and screw-in were measured, as well as final tension.Results:During block testing, no difference in final tensioning was found when comparing the slight-tension, no-tension, and slack groups (42.3 ± 5.3, 37.7 ± 6.4, and 40.2 ± 7.0 N, respectively; P = .528). Similar to block testing, no difference in final tensioning was found when comparing the slight-tension, no-tension, and slack groups using the porcine model (43.64 ± 6.69, 48.09 ± 13.93, and 44.52 ± 6.84 N, respectively; P = .633).Conclusion:The final tension of the suture tape construct appears to be reproducible and consistent, independent of the initial tension introduced with suture anchor placement within the tested parameters.Clinical Relevance:The results of the current study can help optimize the placement technique of independent suture tape reinforcement for ACL reconstruction, which is a promising strategy to help prevent ACL rerupture, particularly in the early phases of postoperative rehabilitation.

Biomechanical but Not Strength or Performance Measures Differentiate Male Athletes Who Experience ACL Reinjury on Return to Level 1 Sports

Background: Performance measures such as strength, jump height/length, and change of direction (CoD) time during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rehabilitation have been used to determine readiness to return to play and identify those who may be at risk of rerupture. However, athletes may reach these criteria despite ongoing biomechanical deficits when performing these tests. Combining return-to-play criteria with an assessment of movement through 3-dimensional (3D) biomechanics in male field sports athletes to identify risk factors for ACL rerupture has not been explored previously. Purpose: To prospectively examine differences in strength, jump, and CoD performance and movement using 3D biomechanics in a cohort of male athletes playing level 1 sports (ie, multidirectional field sports that involve landing, pivoting, or CoD) between those who reinjured the reconstructed ACL (RI group) and those with no reinjury (NRI group) after 2 years of follow-up and to examine the ability of these differences to predict reinjury. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: After primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR), 1045 male athletes were recruited and underwent testing 9 months after surgery including isokinetic strength, jump, and CoD performance measures as well as patient-reported outcomes and 3D biomechanical analyses. Participants were followed up after 2 years regarding ACL reinjury status. Differences were determined between the RI and NRI groups in patient-reported outcomes, performance measures, and 3D biomechanics on the ACLR side and symmetry between limbs. The ability of these measures to predict ACL reinjury was determined through logistic regression. Results: No differences were identified in strength and performance measures on the ACLR side or in symmetry. Biomechanical analysis indicated differences on the ACLR side primarily in the sagittal plane for the double-leg drop jump (effect size, 0.59-0.64) and greater asymmetry primarily in the frontal plane during unplanned CoD (effect size, 0.61-0.69) in the RI group. While these biomechanical test results were different between groups, multivariate regression modeling demonstrated limited ability (area under the curve, 0.67 and 0.75, respectively) to prospectively predict ACL reinjury. Conclusion: Commonly reported return-to-play strength, jump, and timed CoD performance measures did not differ between the RI and NRI groups. Differences in movement based on biomechanical measures during double-leg drop jump and unplanned CoD were identified, although they had limited ability to predict reinjury. Targeting these variables during rehabilitation may reduce reinjury risk in male athletes returning to level 1 sports after ACLR. Registration: NCT02771548 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

There are differences in knee stability based on lateral extra-articular augmentation technique alongside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

The purpose of the current study is to systematically review and network meta-analyze the current evidence in the literature to ascertain if there is a superior lateral extra-articular augmentation technique in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACL.R) with respect to knee stability, re-rupture rates and functional outcomes. The literature search was performed based on the PRISMA guidelines. Cohort studies comparing ACL.R to ACL.R + lateral extra-articular augmentation were included. Lateral extra-articular techniques included were anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALL.R), Cocker-Arnold, Lemaire, Losee, Maraccaci, and McIntosh. Clinical outcomes were compared between ACL.R alone and the different lateral extra-articular augmentation techniques using a frequentist approach to network meta-analysis, with statistical analysis performed using R. The treatment options were ranked using the P-Score. Twenty-eight studies with a total of 2990 patients were included. ACL.R + Cocker-Arnold technique had the highest P-Score for ACL re-ruptures and residual pivot-shift. ACL.R + Cocker-Arnold, Lemaire, and ALL.R all significantly reduced the rate of ACL re-rupture, and residual pivot-shift, compared to ACL.R alone. There was no significant difference between any of the lateral extra-articular augmentation techniques and ACL.R alone. ALL.R had the highest P-Score for return to play, and return to play at pre-injury level. This study established that ACL.R + Cocker-Arnold, Lemaire and ALL.R resulted in significantly lower ipsilateral ACL re-ruptures, as well as reduced pivot-shift, compared to ACL.R alone. Whereas, the other lateral extra-articular augmentation techniques did not reduce pivot-shift and re-rupture. Additionally, functional outcomes and return to play were comparable between those who underwent ACL.R and lateral extra-articular augmentation and ACL.R alone. III.

Return to sports activity in the revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 2–6 Year follow-up study

Introductionand Objective: The risk of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in young patients and those with sports activity is increasing. Regarding the need of athletes with ACL re-rupture to return to sports, ACL revision surgery has received great importance. This study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of ACL reconstruction revision surgery in athletes. MethodIn general, 62 patients with primary surgery and 62 patients with revision ACL surgery were investigated in this study. The study subjects were matched in terms of age, gender, involved leg, injury mechanism, sports group, time of surgery, and the degree of cartilage injury and ankle meniscus rupture. The studied variables included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), sports group, infection, meniscus injuries, chondral lesion, time to return to sports, quality of return to sports, range of motion, Lachman’s test, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm, and Marx scores. They were obtained through the information in the patients’ medical records and the questionnaire filled out by the participants and the examiner’s physician through the follow-ups. Then, the collected data were imported into the SPSS software and underwent analysis. ResultsThe mean follow-up of patients was 49 months (in the range of 2–6 years). None of the patients had a chronic infection. The mean time to return to sports was 29.2 ± 3.2 and 35.3 ± 4.3 weeks in the primary surgery and revision surgery groups, respectively. In addition, 34 (54.8%) and 25 (40.3%) patients of the primary surgery and the revision surgery groups returned to the same level before injury, respectively. On the latest follow-up, the results of the Lachman test showed no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.222) whereas Lysholm, IKDC, MARX, and KOOS scores on the latest follow-up in primary surgery were significantly higher than those of revision surgery (P < 0.001). ConclusionThe rate of return to sports in revision surgery was 14.5% lower than that of primary surgery, and the average time of return to sports was six weeks. The rate of return to sports, similar to before the injury, was significantly lower in the revision group, females, the age group of over 25 years, and contact sports activity, and patients with a chondral lesion. All knee performance scores were also poorer in the revision surgery.

Clinical and radiological outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the T-lock Osteotrans resorbable tendon anchor: early experience and midterm follow-up

PurposeReconstruction of the Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using tendon grafting is an established method for restoring knee function and stability. Multiple methods are established for graft fixation. Several involve anchoring the autograft distant to the joint with hardware that remains implanted. This study reports the first early to midterm results in patients who received ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using the T-Lock Osteotrans femoral near joint fixation method with a tibial fixation using the BioactIF Osteotrans interference screw.MethodsThis consecutive prospective series included 20 Patients (14 Male, 6 Female) with a primary ACL rupture. All patients were treated with an ACLR using a semitendinosus autograft fixated with the T-Lock Osteotrans and were followed-up postoperatively. The following parameters were assessed: Side-to-side difference of the posterior-anterior translation measured using the KT-1000 arthrometer, Tegner activity score, Lysholm score, IKDC subjective knee evaluation form. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done to assess tunnel enlargement and integrity of the anchoring device.ResultsThe average follow-up duration was 2 years (range 1–4.2 years). One patient was lost to follow-up. Two Patients suffered a traumatic ACL re-rupture 2 years postoperatively and received a 2-stage revision ACLR. Difference in the posterior-anterior translation was 1.8 mm (range 0–5). The median Tegner score was 6 (range 4–10) and 9 patients (45%) returned to their preinjury level of activity. The mean IKDC subjective knee evaluation form scored 91 points (range 77–100). The mean Lysholm score was 86 points (74–96). All mentioned scores were significantly better compared to preoperative values. No relevant tunnel enlargement was seen on MRI. The anchoring device was evaluated to be intact in all patients.ConclusionACLR with the aforementioned procedure leads to good clinical and radiological outcome.

Diffusion tensor imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament following primary repair with internal bracing: A longitudinal study.

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) provides information about tissue microstructure and its degree of organization by quantifying water diffusion. We aimed to monitor longitudinal changes in DTI parameters (fractional isotropy, FA; mean diffusivity, MD; axial diffusivity, AD; radial diffusivity, RD) of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) following primary repair with internal bracing (IBLA). Fourteen patients undergoing IBLA were enrolled prospectively and scheduled for clinical follow-up, including instrumented laxity testing, and DTI at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. DTI was also performed in seven healthy subjects. Fiber tractography was used for 3D segmentation of the whole ACL volume, from which median DTI parameters were calculated. The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) served as a control. Longitudinal DTI changes were assessed using a linear mixed model, and repeated measures correlations were calculated between DTI parameters and clinical laxity tests. At follow-up, thirteen patients had a stable knee and one patient sustained an ACL rerupture after 12 months postoperatively. The ACL repair showed a significant decrease of FA within the first 12 months after surgery, followed by stable FA values thereafter, while ACL diffusivities decreased over time returning towards normal values at 24 months postoperatively. For PCL there were no significant DTI changes over time. There was a significant correlation between ACL FA and laxity tests (r = -0.42, P = .017). This study has shown the potential of DTI to longitudinally monitor diffusion changes in the ACL following IBLA. The DTI findings suggest that healing of the ACL repair is incomplete at 24 months postoperatively.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Skeletally Immature Patients: A Meta-analysis Comparing Repair Versus Reconstruction Techniques.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery remains challenging in the skeletally immature patient. Despite the widespread use of physeal-sparing reconstruction techniques, there has been renewed interest in the ACL repair. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to better understand outcomes following all-epiphyseal (AE) reconstruction to extraphyseal reconstruction, while also evaluating ACL repair outcomes in skeletally immature patients. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, all studies in the literature from January 1970 to August 2019 reporting on skeletally immature patients undergoing ACL surgery were identified. Inclusion criteria were pediatric patients with open physes indicative of skeletal immaturity sustaining complete ACL ruptures treated with AE reconstruction, extraphyseal reconstruction or ACL repair. Chronologic age, bone age, postoperative outcomes scores, return to sport rate, and the incidence of complications, namely reruptures, were analyzed. A total of 14 studies comprising 443 patients were identified. No significant difference in chronologic age or postoperative outcome scores at final follow-up were appreciated between patients undergoing AE versus extraphyseal reconstruction. Return to activity rate was significant greater following extraphyseal reconstruction when compared with AE reconstruction. The incidence of any limb-length discrepancies and limb discrepancies measuring ≥10 mm were significant higher following AE reconstruction, while rerupture rates were more common following AE reconstruction. Patients undergoing AE reconstruction possessed significantly lower return to activity rates, higher incidences of limb-length discrepancies and more commonly experienced ACL reruptures when compared with patients undergoing extraphyseal reconstruction. Further investigations analyzing results following ACL repair in skeletally immature patients are warranted to allow for the comparison of outcomes with current physeal-sparing reconstruction techniques. Level IV-systematic review-therapeutic study.