Anterior Cruciate Ligament Augmentation Research Articles

Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Using an Adjustable-Loop Fixation Device: Surgical Technique

Background: There are several techniques for the combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the anterolateral ligament (ALL), but none have shown superiority. This study aims to present a surgical technique that theoretically reduces some of the risks reported in these procedures. Indications: The main indications for the ALL reconstruction include chronic ACL injuries, revision ACL reconstruction, acute ACL injuries in patients with high-grade pivot-shift (grades 2 or 3), patients involved in pivoting sports, and generalized ligament hyperlaxity or knee hyperextension. Technique Description: Hamstring tendon autografts are used for the ACL and ALL reconstruction; a common femoral ACL and ALL tunnel is made outside-in, making a short socket. A continuous looped hamstring tendon autograft attached to one button is used. The ACL is fixed with an adjustable-loop button. Through small incisions, the tibial fixation of both grafts is performed with bioabsorbable screws. Results: We present a 19-year-old professional soccer player with an acute ACL tear, with no associated meniscal or chondral lesions. Owing to his young age and high-risk sports practice, a combined ACL and ALL reconstruction was performed. The combined ACL and ALL reconstruction with a single femoral tunnel using the hamstrings tendons graft is a well-established procedure for ACL augmentation, reducing failure rates for certain risk groups, with excellent outcomes reported. The use of an adjustable-loop button on the femur is a viable option for this kind of reconstruction with postoperative stability comparable to the interference screw, classically used for this kind of reconstruction. Discussion/Conclusion: This technique has some advantages, such as the use of a short outside-in femoral socket, thus theoretically improving healing. In addition, this lowers the risk of lateral collateral ligament injury, and since the ileotibial band graft is not used, the risk of injuring the lateral inferior genicular vessels and the peroneal nerve is theoretically reduced. Besides, using an adjustable-loop cortical button in the femur can theoretically reduce potential complications such as screw migration, soft-tissue impingement, femoral-site pain, and implant removal. Finally, the reconstruction is done with small incisions, improving the aesthetic result and postoperative pain. Considering all the aforementioned factors, this technique theoretically offers some benefits. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Modern Augmented ACL Repair and Autograft ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been the gold standard for primary ACL rupture since the 1990s. In the past decade, ACL repair has received renewed attention and increased research. To compare the clinical outcomes of modern augmented ACL repair versus autograft reconstruction for ACL ruptures. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. A search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted for prospective or retrospective comparative studies published between January 1, 2010, and January 3, 2023, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and methodological quality assessment. Sensitivity analysis was performed to maintain the stability of results. Nine studies were included (minimum follow-up period, 24-60 months). The total sample size was 833 patients (augmented repair group: 358 patients; autograft ACL reconstruction group: 475 patients). There were 4 randomized controlled trials (level 1), 1 prospective comparative study (level 2), 2 retrospective comparative studies (level 3), and 2 case-control studies (level 3). The augmented ACL repair group attained significantly higher Lysholm score (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-3.01; P = .03) and hamstring strength (WMD = 36.69; 95% CI, 29.07-44.31; P < .01) but had higher rates of hardware removal (odds ratio [OR] = 6.30; 95% CI, 2.44-16.23; P = .0001), reoperation (OR = 1.87; 95% CI, 1.33-2.62; P = .0003), and failure (OR = 1.58; 95% CI, 1.03-2.43; P = .0003) compared with the autograft ACL reconstruction group. No significant differences were observed between the repair and reconstruction groups regarding postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Tegner scores, knee laxity, satisfaction, ACL revisions, complications, and reoperation rather than revision. Augmented ACL repair was associated with higher rates of reoperation, hardware removal, and failure compared with autograft ACL reconstruction in studies with minimum 2-year follow-up data. However, augmented ACL repair had higher Lysholm scores and hamstring strength versus autograft ACL reconstruction.

Seatbelt Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Variant of Internal Brace in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With an Adjustable Loop

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in primary anterior cruciate ligament repair with the help of mechanical reinforcement techniques that employ synthetic grafting. The concept of ligament augmentation with reinforcement suture or internal bracing consists of stabilizing the repaired ligament and augmenting it with an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene suture or tape, which guarantees greater resistance, safety during healing, and a more accelerated rehabilitation. In this work, we propose a variant of anterior cruciate ligament augmentation with suture, replacing the suture tape with an adjustable-loop reinforcement system, which is connected to the adjustable suspension devices for the graft in the femur and the tibia, surrounding the graft as a seatbelt.

Return to Sports After ACL Augmentation With Anterolateral Reconstruction (ALR) Harvesting Gracilis Only Compared With ACL Reconstruction With ALR Harvesting Both Hamstring Tendons.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair (ACL-Rp) is known to be a valuable alternative to ACL reconstruction (ACL-Rc) in selected indications. The majority of the ACL-Rp techniques recommend the use of a synthetic brace. The use of the gracilis allows both a biological internal brace and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALR). The primary objective was to compare the early ability to return to sports between patients who underwent ACL-Rp using a gracilis autograft as an internal brace augmentation with ALR and patients who underwent the conventional ACL-Rc with ALR technique sacrificing both the gracilis and the semitendinosus. The secondary objective was to compare the failure rate, clinical scores, and return to sports at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. A retrospective analysis was undertaken. A total of 49 patients who underwent ACL-Rp with ALR between December 2018 and May 2019 were propensity matched at a 1:1 ratio to those who underwent ACL-Rc with ALR during the same period. The decision to perform ACL-Rp with ALR was based on preoperative selection and intraoperative arthroscopic findings: proximal avulsion tear, partial ACL tear, low- to midlevel sports participation, and good tissue quality. The ability to return to sports was assessed using isokinetic tests and the Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport test functional test at 6 months postoperatively. At the final follow-up, knee laxity parameters, return to sports, and clinical outcome (Lysholm score, Tegner Activity Scale score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury score) were recorded. The ACL-Rp group had significantly less hamstring strength deficit when compared with their counterparts who underwent ACL-Rc (0.2% vs 10.2% in concentric, P < .001; 2.5% vs 14% in eccentric, P < .001). The mean Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport test score was significantly higher in the ACL-Rc group (69.7% ± 16.6% [range, 19%-100%] vs 61% ± 16.8% [range, 19%-100%]; P = .001). In the ACL-Rp group, 61% (30/49) of the patients were authorized to return to pivot sports versus 41% (20/49) in the ACL-Rc group (P = .04). At a mean final follow-up of 31.4 ± 3.5 months, no significant differences were demonstrated between groups with respect to clinical scores and knee laxity parameters. There was a trend for a higher failure rate in the ACL-Rp group without any significance (ACL-Rp: 6.1% [3/49] vs ACL-Rc: 0%; P = .08). At 6 months after operation, harvesting only the gracilis with this ACL-Rp and augmentation with ALR technique was linked to a better early ability to return to sports compared with the ACL-Rc with ALR technique harvesting both the gracilis and semitendinosus. This technique had a limited effect on early flexion strength and provided a satisfactory rerupture rate.

Good clinical scores, no evidence of excessive anterior tibial translation, a high return to sport rate and a low re-injury rate is observed following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstrings augmented with suture tape.

Augmented anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) techniques have been proposed to reduce the high reported re-injury rates and low rates of return to sport (RTS). This study reports clinical outcomes, RTS and re-injury rates in patients undergoing ACLR using autologous hamstrings augmented with suture tape. A total of 53 patients were prospectively recruited, undergoing ACLR using hamstrings with suture tape augmentation, combined with a structured rehabilitation programme. Outcomes were collected to 24months, including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), KT-1000 measurements, peak isokinetic knee strength and a four hop test battery. Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) were calculated for performance measures, whilst RTS rates, re-tears and re-operations were presented. There were no significant side-to-side differences in anterior tibial translation between the operated and non-operated knees at 6months (p = 0.433), with no increase (p = 0.841) in side-to-side anterior tibial translation from 6 to 24months. At 24months, 98.0% of patients demonstrated normal (< 3mm) or near normal (3-5mm) side-to-side differences. LSIs for peak knee extensor torque (p < 0.0001) and the single (p = 0.001), triple (p = 0.001) and triple crossover (p < 0.0001) hop tests for distance significantly improved. All PROMs significantly improved (p < 0.0001), with 70.2% and 85.7% of patients actively participating in pivoting sports at 12 and 24months, respectively. Three patients underwent secondary procedures for meniscal symptoms. One patient suffered an ACL re-tear (17months), with no further ipsilateral or contralateral injuries. ACLR with suture tape augmentation demonstrated no evidence of excessive anterior tibial translation, high-scoring PROMs, sound performance scores, a high rate of RTS and low re-injury rate.

Postless Tape Augmentation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction

Suture or tape augmentation for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been described as a technique to increase biomechanical strength and potentially improve clinical outcomes. However, the suture or tape used for augmentation usually requires independent tibial fixation from the ACL graft in the form of an anchor or post. This may introduce the potential for graft and augment tension mismatch, while increasing surgical cost. We present our technique for ACL reconstruction with postless tape augmentation. The ACL graft and tape are fixed at the same tension with interference fixation using a single tibial sheath and screw construct, which allows for ACL augmentation without the need for an additional post or implant.

Remnant-Preserved Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Augmentation in Multi-ligamentous Knee Reconstruction.

This study was conducted to present remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) augmentation as a useful option for partial ACL injury in multiligament knee injury (MLKI) cases, which may also contribute to conserving graft resources. The present study involved patients diagnosed with MLKI at our institute from Spring 2006 to February 2021. A total of 71 MLKI cases were provided surgery due to knee instability and disability. For every patient, an arthroscopic diagnostic was performed to ensure that ACL tear and a remnant were present. When the ACL remnant was classified into group 2, 3, or 4 of Nakamae's classification, remnant-preserved single bundle ACL augmentation was performed. Graft selection and the combination of injured ligaments were evaluated. The side-to-side difference under an anterior tibial load of 134 N with an arthrometer and the leg symmetry index at 60 degrees/s were measured. The present procedure was performed for five cases (male/female: 4/1, mean age: 33.6 years). The mean follow-up period was 26.4 months. The combination of torn ligaments was as follows: 3 cases of ACL + medial collateral ligament, one case of ACL + posterior cruciate ligament, and one case of ACL + posterolateral corner. An ACL augmentation graft was performed using an ipsilateral gracilis tendon in 2 cases, a contralateral full semitendinosus tendon in 2 cases, and the ipsilateral distal 1/2 of the semitendinosus tendon in 1 case. The mean side-to-side difference was 1.07 ± 0.4 mm. The mean leg symmetry index was 82.6 ± 12.2% in knee extension and 96.3 ± 9.9% in knee flexion. Although the present study was a small case series, the remnant-preserved single-bundle ACL augmentation for MLKI surgery provided good clinical outcome and conserved the graft resource. Even in the MLKI case, this technique is one of the useful surgical options. The level of evidence of this study is level IV (case series).

All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Augmentation Using the Native Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnant by Suture Approximation

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture remains a debilitating orthopaedic pathology with a substantial economic and psychological burden on patients, especially athletes. The purpose of ACL reconstruction is to attain maximum joint stability and functionality, allowing patients to resume their previous level of activity. Several graft options and techniques are available for ACL reconstruction. The all-inside remnant-preservation technique is a minimally invasive approach aiming for improved proprioception, better graft integration, and increased graft strength via ACL augmentation by suture approximation with an optimal anatomic reconstruction. ACL augmentation is associated with a decreased risk of rerupture. Moreover, enhancement of knee proprioception via the presented technique allows an early return to activity by patients because weight bearing (with a brace) can be initiated as early as day 1 postoperatively. Patients can resume running activities by 2 months postoperatively and return to pivot sports by 3 months postoperatively. Despite this surgical procedure being technically demanding, it is associated with improved clinical outcomes and functional capacities. Patients are also found to better tolerate the postoperative rehabilitation protocol.

Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair With an Autograft Reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using an autograft gives good results that could provide improved failure rates. ACL augmentation saving the remnant has demonstrated advantages, such as saving vascular supply and nerve receptors, which could be useful for healing. Conversely, isolated repair techniques are gaining interest but do not give good results because structural augmentation is necessary to reinforce the repair and expect healing. We describe a technique combining the advantages of both techniques with an autograft using the semitendinosus and repair of the remnant. This combined technique allows protection and redirection of the remnant, improves graft incorporation, and covers more graft by suturing the remnant around an autologous graft.

Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Repair or Reconstruction? Two-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Background: Contemporary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) suture repair techniques have been subject to renewed interest in recent years. Although several clinical studies have yielded good short-term results, high-quality evidence is lacking in regard to the effectiveness of this treatment compared with ACL reconstruction. Hypothesis: Dynamic augmented ACL suture repair is at least as effective as anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction for the treatment of acute ACL rupture in terms of patient self-reported outcomes at 2 years postoperatively. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: After stratification and randomization, 48 patients underwent either dynamic augmented ACL suture repair or ACL reconstruction with a single-bundle, all-inside, semitendinosus technique. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score at 2 years postoperatively was the primary outcome measure. Patient-reported outcomes (IKDC subjective score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Tegner score, visual analog scale for satisfaction), clinical outcomes (IKDC physical examination score, leg symmetry index for the quadriceps, hamstrings strength, and jump test battery), and radiological outcomes as well as adverse events including reruptures were recorded. Analyses were based on an intention-to-treat principle. Results: The lower limit for the median IKDC subjective score of the repair group (86.2) fell within the prespecified noninferiority margin, confirming noninferiority of dynamic augmented ACL suture repair compared with ACL reconstruction. No statistical difference was found between groups for median IKDC subjective score (repair, 95.4; reconstruction, 94.3). Overall, 2 reruptures (8.7%) occurred in the dynamic ACL suture repair group and 4 reruptures (19.0%) in the ACL reconstruction group; further, 5 repeat surgeries—other than for revision ACL surgery—took place in 4 patients from the dynamic ACL suture repair group (20.8%) and in 3 patients from the ACL reconstruction group (14.3%). Conclusion: Dynamic augmented ACL suture repair is not inferior to ACL reconstruction in terms of subjective patient-reported outcomes as measured with the IKDC subjective score 2 years postoperatively. However, for reasons other than revision ACL surgery due to rerupture, a higher number of related adverse events leading to repeat surgery were seen in the dynamic augmented ACL suture repair group within 2 years postoperatively. Clinical Relevance: Dynamic augmented ACL suture repair might be a viable treatment option for patients with an acute ACL rupture. Registration: NCT02310854 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Arthroscopic Synthetic Augmentation in Acute Partial Injury of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Acute partial injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a challenging condition without a standard treatment. Although ACL reconstruction provided a better outcome previously, recent studies have shown that preserving the ACL stump yields promising results in terms of better vascularization, proprioception, and ligamentization. ACL augmentation is becoming more popular. Therefore, we propose a technique to augment an acute partial ACL injury with synthetic suture material to stabilize the unstable cruciate ligament. The suture material acts as a structural tie for ACL healing without any need for external immobilization. This technique is beneficial in preserving the natural ACL stump and autograft, creating a narrow bone tunnel, and providing a good cosmetic outcome.

Periprosthetic total knee fracture after remote reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a case report

BackgroundDistal femoral fracture is a rare, but significant, postoperative complication of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. However, there has not been a reported case of periprosthetic total knee arthroplasty fracture associated with a previous anterior cruciate ligament repair.Case presentationWe report the case of a 51-year-old white man with a history of total knee arthroplasty and remote anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, who presented with a distal femoral periprosthetic fracture at the site of a previous anterior cruciate ligament augmentation staple.ConclusionsBased on these findings, it may be important to consider removal of previous anterior cruciate ligament hardware prior to total knee arthroplasty to reduce risk of periprosthetic fracture, which should be determined on a patient-specific basis.

Single-Bundle Augmentation for a Partial Tear of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Given the prevalence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in young athletes, it is essential to elucidate and illustrate surgical interventions that return the most favorable outcomes. Although most ACL injuries are full-thickness tears, occasionally either the anteromedial (AM) or posterolateral (PL) bundle is torn in isolation, allowing consideration of an ACL reconstruction or augmentation. Because the ACL-deficient knee has been shown to exhibit less proprioceptive feedback, the preservation of the intact bundle may offer an inherent component of stability. After arthroscopy has confirmed a partial ACL tear, the decision to augment the intact bundle can be made. The technique is adapted from principles of the double-bundle reconstruction such that the graft follows the path of either the native AM bundle or the native PL bundle, depending on the location of the partial tear. We present our surgical technique for ACL AM bundle augmentation with PL bundle reconstruction using a semitendinosus tendon autograft.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Augmentation for One-Bundle Tears

One-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears continue to pose a dilemma for orthopaedic surgeons. Though relatively rare, 1-bundle tears can be symptomatic and often evolve into complete tears. Early management of these injuries could prove invaluable to decreased injury-related morbidity. Diagnosis of these injuries relies on clinical history, examination, imaging studies, and arthroscopic evaluation. The key to success lies in the confirmation of the diagnosis on the basis of functional symptoms. Examination under anesthesia is indicated for this purpose, with pivot shift testing remaining the cornerstone for evaluation of ACL function. Final operative treatment decisions must be made only after thorough arthroscopic testing. When implemented successfully, the ACL augmentation surgical technique follows the anatomic, individualized ACL reconstruction concept, focusing on reconstruction of the injured bundle while sparking the intact ligament’s fibers. Though large randomized controlled trials have not been done, studies have shown that in appropriately selected patients, ACL augmentation surgery leads to improved graft orientation, mechanical stability, vascularity, proprioceptive innervation, faster graft remodeling, and a safer, more rapid rehabilitation.

Short term results of anterior cruciate ligament augmentation in professional and amateur athletes

BackgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a widely accepted procedure; however, controversies exist about ACL augmentation. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of ACL augmentation in professional and amateur athletes with isolated single bundle ACL tears.Materials and methodsA consecutive series of professional and amateur athletes with partial ACL tears who underwent selective bundle reconstruction were analyzed. Stability was assessed with the Lachman test, anterior-drawer test, pivot-shift test and KT-1000 arthrometer. Functional assessment was performed using the subjective Lysholm questionnaire.ResultsFifty-six patients were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 19.3 months. All patients had posterolateral bundle (PLB) tears, and no anteromedial bundle (AMB) tears were found. The Lysholm score improved significantly from 78 (SD = 2.69) preoperatively to 96 (SD = 3.41) postoperatively (P value <0.0001). The pivot-shift test, Lachman test and anterior-drawer test results were negative in all cases postoperatively. Anterior tibial translation from neutral was 4.9 mm (SD = 2.7) preoperatively, and decreased significantly to 2.1 (SD = 0.6) postoperatively, measured with a KT-1000 arthrometer (P value <0.00001).ConclusionIn this study, we showed that ACL augmentation had good results in symptomatic professional and amateur athletes, and although further studies are needed to investigate long-term results, we recommend this surgery for all symptomatic athletic patients, especially those who would like to maintain an active lifestyle.Level of evidence IV.

Cost of Outpatient Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Commercially Insured Patients in the United States, 2005-2013.

Background:Despite the significance of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, these conditions have been under-researched from a population-level perspective. It is important to determine the economic effect of these injuries in order to document the public health burden in the United States.Purpose:To describe the cost of outpatient arthroscopic ACL reconstruction and health care utilization among commercially insured beneficiaries in the United States.Study Design:Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:The study used the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database, an administrative claims database that contains a large sample (approximately 148 million) of privately insured individuals aged <65 years and enrolled in employer-sponsored plans. All claims with Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 29888 (arthroscopically aided ACL reconstruction or augmentation) from 2005 to 2013 were included. “Immediate procedure” cost was computed assuming a 3-day window of care centered on date of surgery. “Total health care utilization” cost was computed using a 9-month window of care (3 months preoperative and 6 months postoperative).Results:There were 229,446 outpatient arthroscopic ACL reconstructions performed over the 9-year study period. Median immediate procedure cost was $9399.49. Median total health care utilization cost was $13,403.38. Patients who underwent concomitant collateral ligament (medial [MCL], lateral [LCL]) repair or reconstruction had the highest costs for both immediate procedure ($12,473.24) and health care utilization ($17,006.34). For patients who had more than 1 reconstruction captured in the database, total health care utilization costs were higher for the second procedure than the first procedure ($16,238.43 vs $15,000.36), despite the fact that immediate procedure costs were lower for second procedures ($8685.73 vs $9445.26).Conclusion:These results provide a foundation for understanding the public health burden of ACL injuries in the United States. Our findings suggest that further research on the prevention and treatment of ACL injuries is necessary to reduce this burden.

Stem cell-based therapy in anterior cruciate ligament repair

In the past, the suture repair of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has been reported with poor results, which indicated the poor healing potential of ACL. However, the poor results were attributable not only to a low intrinsic healing potential of the ligament, but also to other environmental factors that include mechanical environment, inflammatory condition, blood supply, nutrient delivery, and the supply of growth factors. Recently, biological manipulation could be an available option among several potential options. This includes the use of growth factors, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), stem cells, and biological scaffolds. With these tools, augmented ACL repair has been investigated to accelerate repair and regeneration. Specifically, stem cell-based therapy has been paid great attention based on the potential of stem cells to regenerate tissue. This review describes the current understanding of capacity of ACL healing and summarizes the current status of related stem cell therapy. Future limitations and perspectives are also discussed.

Remnant-preserving, selective single-bundle augmentation of the anterior cruciate ligament using a bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft: A technical note

BackgroundTo the best of our knowledge, there has been no detailed study on bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) grafts for remnant-preserving, selective-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) augmentation. Therefore, we aimed to develop such a technique using a BTB graft. MethodA total of five patients underwent surgery using the presented procedure. These patients were young, male, and with high body mass index, and hence required very high durability of reconstructed ACL. A femoral bone tunnel was created using the inside-out technique via an accessory far-medial portal, protecting the remnant using a probe, regardless of the presence of an anteromedial (AM) or posterolateral (PL) tunnel. A single tibial tunnel was drilled at the center of the AM or PL attachment and two transverse skin incisions were made in the ipsilateral knee. The central third of the patellar tendon attached to a patellar and tibial bone plug autograft with a width of seven millimeters was harvested by subcutaneous tunneling. The femoral side was fixed using a cortical fixation device for BTB and the tibial bone plug was fixed using an interference screw with the knee at an angle of 20° of flexion by applying maximal manual traction. ResultsBone tunnel enlargement, which was measured by computed digital radiography, was not observed in all cases. A BTB autograft for remnant-preserving, selective-bundle ACL augmentation offers reduced risk of tunnel enlargement. ConclusionThe presented procedure might be considered one of the potentially available options for patients with ACL partial tear who require very high durability of reconstructed ACL. Level of evidence5

Cruciate Ligament Repair with Nitinol Wire Synthetic Allograft

Objectives:To present two cases who underwent cruciate ligament repair by nitinol wire synthetic allograft and to discuss outcomes.Methods:Although definitive incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injuries is unknown, it is estimated that annual 200.000 rupture occurs with 100.000 reconstructions in United States [1]. Therapeutic options include medical treatment, isolated or augmented anterior cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction with autograft, allograft and synthetic grafts. Debates on the treatment of such injury focus on selection of graft rather than need for surgery. Once anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was decided, surgeon should have to select a graft. In general, an autograft is preferred. There are also allograft and synthetic grafts. Autograft have advantages of low risk for cross-inflammatory response and lack of risk for disease transmission. Nitinol is a material produced from nickel and titanium. It is more often used in vascular stents, orthodontic wires, implants used in mandible surgery and some orthopedic implants [2]. We presented 2 patients who underwent reconstruction with synthetic grafts produced from flexible nitinol wire.Results:Case 1: A 31-year old man presented to our clinic with pain at right knee. The patient underwent cruciate ligament surgery 10 years ago at another facility. His right knee was sprained again 12 months ago; thus, he was re-operated ad anterior cruciate reconstruction was performed in a facility. The patient had pain after surgery. On the physical examination, there was limitation in knee flexion by 100 degree and in knee extension by 10 degree at the right. It was seen that there was painful knee movements. It was found that there was tenderness at medial joint space and patellofemoral grind test was positive while Lachman and anterior drawer tests were negative. On the plain radiographs, it was observed that reconstruction was performed by using flexible nitinol wire synthetic graft and that occasional fractures in nitinol wire existed. The patient accepted removal of graft when he was informed. Thus, we removed flexible nitinol wire synthetic graft and interference screw. In the arthroscopic examination, it was seen that there was grade 4 cartilage defect in patellofemoral joint with occasional fracture in flexible nitinol wire synthetic graft. Endo-button was localized at suprapatellar pouch and removed via artrhroscopy. Micro-fracture procedure was performed for cartilage defect. The patient was scheduled for physical therapy after surgery. After 3 months, it was seen that complaints were resolved and he had almost full range of motion without instability signs. Case 2: A 23-year old man presented to our clinic with pain at right knee. He reported that his knee was injured during sports 9 months ago and he underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in another facility. However, he had persistent pain. On the physical examination, it was seen that there was full range of motion at knee but diffuse knee pain in hyperflexion. It was seen that medial McMurray test was positive and there was tenderness at medial joint space while Lachman and anterior drawer tests were negative. On the plain radiographs, it was observed that reconstruction was performed by using flexible nitinol wire synthetic graft and that occasional fractures in nitinol wire existed. Revision surgery was recommended but the patient didn’t attend control visit.Conclusion:Orthopedic surgeons tend to have appreciation against novel instruments; however, novel techniques should be adopted by meticulously considering outcomes without fascinating. It is clear that use of synthetic grafts without sufficient experimental and biomechanical in vivo and in vitro studies will result in some complications.

Ligament bracing – Augmentierte Primärnaht bei multiligamentären Verletzungen des Kniegelenks

Reconstruction of knee stability by primary ligament sutures and additional augmentation after knee dislocation. Acute knee dislocation Schenck type III and IV. Operative treatment should be performed within 7 days after injury. Chronic instability after knee dislocation, refixable bony avulsions, critical soft tissue, infection, lack of compliance. Supine position with electric leg holder. Short arthroscopic assessment of concomitant injuries. Schenck type III medial injuries and Schenck IV injuries: anteromedial parapatellar arthrotomy. Injuries type Schenck III lateral: anteromedian arthrotomy. Armoring of ligament stumps for transosseus sutures. Placement of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) drill tunnels. Extracortical diversion of the suture armorings and insertion of augmentation systems. Fixation of the PCL augmentation in 70-90° flexion. Fixation of the ACL augmentation in 20-30° flexion. Knotting of the transosseus ligament sutures. If necessary (postero-)lateral and/or medial stabilization. Limited weight bearing with 20 kg for 6 weeks. Stabilizing brace (e.g., Hypex-Lite®, Albrecht) generally for 12 weeks. Mobilization under tension of the quadriceps muscle for 6 weeks. In total, 20 patients have been treated using the principle of "ligament bracing". So far 8 patients (aged 18-60 years, median 33 years) have been assessed with a follow-up of 10-15 months (median 12 months) postoperatively. In all, 6 patients showed stable knees with good results. Recurrent instability of the ACL was observed in 2 patients; the collateral ligaments and PCL were stable. For the evaluation the following scores were used: IKDC score, Tegner score, and Lysholm score. To objectify the data, stress radiography and physical examination were performed. Using the operative technique mentioned above, no complications occurred. During follow-up 2 patients reported a deficiency of flexion.