Anterior Auditory Field Research Articles

Quantifying myelin density in the feline auditory cortex.

The cerebral cortex comprises many distinct regions that differ in structure, function, and patterns of connectivity. Current approaches to parcellating these regions often take advantage of functional neuroimaging approaches that can identify regions involved in a particular process with reasonable spatial resolution. However, neuroanatomical biomarkers are also very useful in identifying distinct cortical regions either in addition to, or in place of functional measures. For example, differences in myelin density are thought to relate to functional differences between regions, are sensitive to individual patterns of experience, and have been shown to vary across functional hierarchies in a predictable manner. Accordingly, the current study provides quantitative stereological estimates of myelin density for each of the 13 regions that make up the feline auditory cortex. We demonstrate that significant differences can be observed between auditory cortical regions, with the highest myelin density observed in the regions that comprise the auditory core (i.e., the primary auditory cortex and anterior auditory field). Moreover, our myeloarchitectonic map suggests that myelin density varies in a hierarchical fashion that conforms to the traditional model of spatial organization in auditory cortex. Taken together, these results establish myelin as a useful biomarker for parcellating auditory cortical regions, and provide detailed estimates against which other, less invasive methods of quantifying cortical myelination may be compared.

Auditory discrimination learning differentially modulates neural representation in auditory cortex subregions and inter-areal connectivity

Changes in sound-evoked responses in the auditory cortex (ACtx) occur during learning, but how learning alters neural responses in different ACtx subregions and changes their interactions is unclear. To address these questions, we developed an automated training and widefield imaging system to longitudinally track the neural activity of all mouse ACtx subregions during a tone discrimination task. We find that responses in primary ACtx are highly informative of learned stimuli and behavioral outcomes throughout training. In contrast, representations of behavioral outcomes in the dorsal posterior auditory field, learned stimuli in the dorsal anterior auditory field, and inter-regional correlations between primary and higher-order areas are enhanced with training. Moreover, ACtx response changes vary between stimuli, and such differences display lag synchronization with the learning rate. These results indicate that learning alters functional connections between ACtx subregions, inducing region-specific modulations by propagating behavioral information from primary to higher-order areas.

Topography and Ensemble Activity in the Auditory Cortex of a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is often associated with social communication impairments and specific sound processing deficits, for example, problems in following speech in noisy environments. To investigate underlying neuronal processing defects located in the auditory cortex (AC), we performed two-photon Ca2+ imaging in FMR1 (fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1) knock-out (KO) mice, a model for fragile X syndrome (FXS), the most common cause of hereditary ASD in humans. For primary AC (A1) and the anterior auditory field (AAF), topographic frequency representation was less ordered compared with control animals. We additionally analyzed ensemble AC activity in response to various sounds and found subfield-specific differences. In A1, ensemble correlations were lower in general, while in secondary AC (A2), correlations were higher in response to complex sounds, but not to pure tones. Furthermore, sound specificity of ensemble activity was decreased in AAF. Repeating these experiments 1 week later revealed no major differences regarding representational drift. Nevertheless, we found subfield- and genotype-specific changes in ensemble correlation values between the two times points, hinting at alterations in network stability in FMR1 KO mice. These detailed insights into AC network activity and topography in FMR1 KO mice add to the understanding of auditory processing defects in FXS.

Mouse auditory cortex sub-fields receive neuronal projections from MGB subdivisions independently

Mouse auditory cortex is composed of six sub-fields: primary auditory field (AI), secondary auditory field (AII), anterior auditory field (AAF), insular auditory field (IAF), ultrasonic field (UF) and dorsoposterior field (DP). Previous studies have examined thalamo-cortical connections in the mice auditory system and learned that AI, AAF, and IAF receive inputs from the ventral division of the medial geniculate body (MGB). However, the functional and thalamo-cortical connections between nonprimary auditory cortex (AII, UF, and DP) is unclear. In this study, we examined the locations of neurons projecting to these three cortical sub-fields in the MGB, and addressed the question whether these cortical sub-fields receive inputs from different subsets of MGB neurons or common. To examine the distributions of projecting neurons in the MGB, retrograde tracers were injected into the AII, UF, DP, after identifying these areas by the method of Optical Imaging. Our results indicated that neuron cells which in ventral part of dorsal MGB (MGd) and that of ventral MGB (MGv) projecting to UF and AII with less overlap. And DP only received neuron projecting from MGd. Interestingly, these three cortical areas received input from distinct part of MGd and MGv in an independent manner. Based on our foundings these three auditory cortical sub-fields in mice may independently process auditory information.

Corticostriatal Neurons in the Anterior Auditory Field Regulate Frequency Discrimination Behavior.

The anterior auditory field (AAF) is a core region of the auditory cortex and plays a vital role in discrimination tasks. However, the role of the AAF corticostriatal neurons in frequency discrimination remains unclear. Here, we used c-Fos staining, fiber photometry recording, and pharmacogenetic manipulation to investigate the function of the AAF corticostriatal neurons in a frequency discrimination task. c-Fos staining and fiber photometry recording revealed that the activity of AAF pyramidal neurons was significantly elevated during the frequency discrimination task. Pharmacogenetic inhibition of AAF pyramidal neurons significantly impaired frequency discrimination. In addition, histological results revealed that AAF pyramidal neurons send strong projections to the striatum. Moreover, pharmacogenetic suppression of the striatal projections from pyramidal neurons in the AAF significantly disrupted the frequency discrimination. Collectively, our findings show that AAF pyramidal neurons, particularly the AAF-striatum projections, play a crucial role in frequency discrimination behavior.

Vowel speech recognition from rat electroencephalography using long short-term memory neural network.

Over the years, considerable research has been conducted to investigate the mechanisms of speech perception and recognition. Electroencephalography (EEG) is a powerful tool for identifying brain activity; therefore, it has been widely used to determine the neural basis of speech recognition. In particular, for the classification of speech recognition, deep learning-based approaches are in the spotlight because they can automatically learn and extract representative features through end-to-end learning. This study aimed to identify particular components that are potentially related to phoneme representation in the rat brain and to discriminate brain activity for each vowel stimulus on a single-trial basis using a bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) network and classical machine learning methods. Nineteen male Sprague-Dawley rats subjected to microelectrode implantation surgery to record EEG signals from the bilateral anterior auditory fields were used. Five different vowel speech stimuli were chosen, /a/, /e/, /i/, /o/, and /u/, which have highly different formant frequencies. EEG recorded under randomly given vowel stimuli was minimally preprocessed and normalized by a z-score transformation to be used as input for the classification of speech recognition. The BiLSTM network showed the best performance among the classifiers by achieving an overall accuracy, f1-score, and Cohen’s κ values of 75.18%, 0.75, and 0.68, respectively, using a 10-fold cross-validation approach. These results indicate that LSTM layers can effectively model sequential data, such as EEG; hence, informative features can be derived through BiLSTM trained with end-to-end learning without any additional hand-crafted feature extraction methods.

Cortical nicotinic enhancement of tone-evoked heightened activities and subcortical nicotinic enlargement of activated areas in mouse auditory cortex

Systemic nicotine administration regulates neuronal activities in mouse auditory cortex. How nicotine regulates the spread of the activities across auditory cortical areas is not well known. We investigate this using flavoprotein fluorescence imaging. 20 kHz amplitude-modulated (AM) tones increased the peak intensity of flavoprotein fluorescence in presumptive primary auditory cortex (A1). 5 kHz AM tones activated at least three cortical areas, which are presumably A1, anterior auditory field, and secondary auditory cortex. Nicotine enlarged tone-activated cortical areas and enhanced both 20 kHz and 5 kHz tone-evoked fluorescence intensities at their respective, optimal frequency peak sites and at non-optimal frequency peak sites in A1. The extent of this enhancement was greater at non-optimal frequency sites than at optimal frequency sites. A cortical injection of dihydro-β-erythroidine, an inhibitor of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors composed of α4 and β2-subunits (α4β2*-nAChRs), blocked the enhancement of fluorescence intensity at the peak sites but did not appear to block the enlargement of activated areas. These results suggest that nicotine exposure activates cortical α4β2*-nAChRs to enhance tone-evoked local neuronal activities at an optimal frequency site. The nicotine-induced enlargement of a tone-activated area may depend on the nicotinic enhancement of cortical inputs or other activities.

Distinct integration of spectrally complex sounds in mouse primary auditory cortices

The standard hierarchical signal transmission along the lemniscal auditory pathway in mice changes in the cortex, where two tonotopically organized auditory regions receive thalamic inputs in parallel: the primary auditory cortex (A1) and the anterior auditory field (AAF). These fields show distinct properties of sound-evoked responses, where A1 responds robustly to sound onset and AAF exhibits faster and more transient responses following both sound onset and offset. Previous reports showed a strong involvement of AAF in temporal processing, revealing its particular role in encoding temporal information. A more regular tonotopy, narrower frequency response areas, and more robust direction selectivity to frequency modulated sweeps led to the speculation that A1 codes better the spectral composition of a sound than AAF. However, potential mechanisms explaining why A1 favors spectral processing have not been previously described. Using in vivo electrophysiological recordings in the mouse auditory cortex, we found that A1 neurons, unlike AAF neurons, respond stronger and faster to spectrally complex tones than to pure tones. Next, we show that both regular and putative fast-spiking neurons in A1, but not in AAF, display larger responses to spectrally complex tones than to pure tones. Finally, we use a laminar analysis to demonstrate that A1 neurons in layer 2/3 respond stronger to spectrally complex tones than neurons in layer 4, indicating an important transformation of the neural representation of spectral complexity between thalamo-recipient and supragranular layers in A1, but not in AAF. Our study reveals circuit features contributing to distinct processing of spectrally simple and complex sounds in the two primary auditory cortices and supports a dual-stream processing in the core auditory cortex.

Task-induced modulations of neuronal activity along the auditory pathway.

Sensory processing varies depending on behavioral context. Here, we ask how task engagement modulates neurons in the auditory system. We train mice in a simple tone-detection task and compare their neuronal activity during passive hearing and active listening. Electrophysiological extracellular recordings in the inferior colliculus, medial geniculate body, primary auditory cortex, and anterior auditory field reveal widespread modulations across all regions and cortical layers and in both putative regular- and fast-spiking cortical neurons. Clustering analysis unveils ten distinct modulation patterns that can either enhance or suppress neuronal activity. Task engagement changes the tone-onset response in most neurons. Such modulations first emerge in subcortical areas, ruling out cortical feedback as the only mechanism underlying subcortical modulations. Half the neurons additionally display late modulations associated with licking, arousal, or reward. Our results reveal the presence of functionally distinct subclasses of neurons, differentially sensitive to specific task-related variables but anatomically distributed along the auditory pathway.

The posterior auditory field is the chief generator of prediction error signals in the auditory cortex

The auditory cortex (AC) encompasses distinct fields subserving partly different aspects of sound processing. One essential function of the AC is the detection of unpredicted sounds, as revealed by differential neural activity to predictable and unpredictable sounds. According to the predictive coding framework, this effect can be explained by repetition suppression and/or prediction error signaling. The present study investigates functional specialization of the rat AC fields in repetition suppression and prediction error by combining a tone frequency oddball paradigm (involving high-probable standard and low-probable deviant tones) with two different control sequences (many-standards and cascade). Tones in the control sequences were comparable to deviant events with respect to neural adaptation but were not violating a regularity. Therefore, a difference in the neural activity between deviant and control tones indicates a prediction error effect, whereas a difference between control and standard tones indicates a repetition suppression effect. Single-unit recordings revealed by far the largest prediction error effects for the posterior auditory field, while the primary auditory cortex, the anterior auditory field, the ventral auditory field, and the suprarhinal auditory field were dominated by repetition suppression effects. Statistically significant repetition suppression effects occurred in all AC fields, whereas prediction error effects were less robust in the primary auditory cortex and the anterior auditory field. Results indicate that the non-lemniscal, posterior auditory field is more engaged in context-dependent processing underlying deviance-detection than the other AC fields, which are more sensitive to stimulus-dependent effects underlying differential degrees of neural adaptation.

Neuroplastic changes in auditory cortex induced by long-duration “non-traumatic” noise exposures are triggered by deficits in the neural output of the cochlea

Long-term exposure to moderate intensity noise that does not cause measureable hearing loss can cause striking changes in sound-evoked neural activity in auditory cortex. It is unclear if these changes originate in the cortex or result from functional deficits in the neural output of the cochlea. To explore this issue, rats were exposed for 6-weeks to 18–24 kHz noise at 45, 65 or 85 dB SPL and then compared the noise-induced changes in the cochlear compound action potential (CAP) with the neurophysiological alterations in the anterior auditory field (AAF) of auditory cortex. The 45-dB exposure, which had no effect on the cochlear CAP also had no effect on the AAF. In contrast, the 85-dB exposure greatly reduced CAP amplitudes at high frequencies, but had little or no effect on low frequencies. Despite the large reduction in high-frequency CAP neural responses, high frequency AAF neural responses (spike rate and local field potential amplitude) remained largely within normal limits, evidence of central gain compensation. AAF responses were also enhanced at the low frequencies even though CAP responses were normal; this AAF hyperactivity only occurred at low-moderate intensities (level-dependent enhanced central gain). The 65-dB exposure also caused a moderate reduction in high-frequency CAP amplitudes. Notwithstanding this cochlear loss, AAF responses were boosted into the normal range, evidence of homeostatic gain compensation. Our results suggest that the noise-induced neuroplastic changes in the auditory cortex from so-called “non-traumatic” exposures are triggered from functional deficits in the neural output of the cochlea.

Postnatal development of subfields in the core region of the mouse auditory cortex

The core region of the rodent auditory cortex has two subfields: the primary auditory area (A1) and the anterior auditory field (AAF). Although the postnatal development of A1 has been studied in several mammalian species, few studies have been conducted on the postnatal development of AAF. Using a voltage-sensitive-dye-based imaging method, we examined and compared the postnatal development of AAF and A1 in mice from postnatal day 11 (P11) to P40. We focused on the postnatal development of tonotopy, the relative position between A1 and AAF, and the properties of tone-evoked responses in the subfields. Tone-evoked responses in the mouse auditory cortex were first observed at P12, and tonotopy was found in both A1 and AAF at this age. Quantification of tonotopy using the cortical magnification factor (CMF; octave difference per unit cortical distance) revealed a rapid change from P12 to P14 in both A1 and AAF, and a stable level from P14. A similar time course of postnatal development was found for the distance between the 4 kHz site in A1 and AAF, the distance between the 16 kHz site in A1 and AAF, and the angle between the frequency axis of A1 and AAF. The maximum amplitude and rise time of tone-evoked signals in both A1 and AAF showed no significant change from P12 to P40, but the latency of the responses to both the 4 kHz and 16 kHz tones decreased during this period, with a more rapid decrease in the latency to 16 kHz tones in both subfields. The duration of responses evoked by 4 kHz tones in both A1 and AAF showed no significant postnatal change, but the duration of responses to 16 kHz tones decreased exponentially in both subfields. The cortical area activated by 4 kHz tones in AAF was always larger than that in A1 at all ages (P12-P40). Our results demonstrated that A1 and AAF developed in parallel postnatally, showing a rapid maturation of tonotopy, slow maturation of response latency and response duration, and a dorsal-to-ventral order (high-frequency site to low-frequency site) of functional maturation.

Distinct Manifestations of Cooperative, Multidimensional Stimulus Representations in Different Auditory Forebrain Stations.

Classic spectrotemporal receptive fields (STRFs) for auditory neurons are usually expressed as a single linear filter representing a single encoded stimulus feature. Multifilter STRF models represent the stimulus-response relationship of primary auditory cortex (A1) neurons more accurately because they can capture multiple stimulus features. To determine whether multifilter processing is unique to A1, we compared the utility of single-filter versus multifilter STRF models in the medial geniculate body (MGB), anterior auditory field (AAF), and A1 of ketamine-anesthetized cats. We estimated STRFs using both spike-triggered average (STA) and maximally informative dimension (MID) methods. Comparison of basic filter properties of first maximally informative dimension (MID1) and second maximally informative dimension (MID2) in the 3 stations revealed broader spectral integration of MID2s in MGBv and A1 as opposed to AAF. MID2 peak latency was substantially longer than for STAs and MID1s in all 3 stations. The 2-filter MID model captured more information and yielded better predictions in many neurons from all 3 areas but disproportionately more so in AAF and A1 compared with MGBv. Significantly, information-enhancing cooperation between the 2 MIDs was largely restricted to A1 neurons. This demonstrates significant differences in how these 3 forebrain stations process auditory information, as expressed in effective and synergistic multifilter processing.

Differential cortical and subcortical projection targets of subfields in the core region of mouse auditory cortex

The core region of the rodent auditory cortex has two areas: the primary auditory area (A1) and the anterior auditory field (AAF). However, the functional difference between these areas is unclear. To elucidate this issue, here we studied the projections from A1 and AAF in mice using adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors expressing either a green fluorescent protein or a red fluorescent protein. After mapping A1 and AAF using optical imaging, we injected a distinct AAV vector into each of the two fields at a frequency-matched high-frequency location. We found that A1 and AAF projected commonly to virtually all target areas examined, but each field had its own preference for projection targets. Frontal and parietal regions were the major cortical targets: in the frontal cortex, A1 and AAF showed dominant projections to the anterior cingulate cortex Cg1 and the secondary motor cortex (M2), respectively; in the parietal cortex, A1 and AAF exhibited dense projections to the medial secondary visual cortex and the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), respectively. Although M2 and PPC received considerable input from A1 as well, A1 innervated the medial part whereas AAF innervated the lateral part of these cortical regions. A1 also projected to the orbitofrontal cortex, while AAF also projected to the primary somatosensory cortex and insular auditory cortex. As for subcortical projections, A1 and AAF projected to a common ventromedial region in the caudal striatum with a comparable strength; they also both projected to the medial geniculate body and the inferior colliculus, innervating common and distinct divisions of the nuclei. A1 also projected to visual subcortical structures, such as the superior colliculus and the lateral posterior nucleus of the thalamus, where fibres from AAF were sparse. Our results demonstrate the preference of A1 and AAF for cortical and subcortical targets, and for divisions in individual target. The preference of A1 and AAF for sensory-related structures suggest a role for A1 in providing auditory information for audio-visual association at both the cortical and subcortical level, and a distinct role of AAF in providing auditory information for association with somatomotor information in the cortex.

Anterior Auditory Field Is Needed for Sound Categorization in Fear Conditioning Task of Adult Rat.

Both primary auditory cortex (A1) and anterior auditory field (AAF) are core regions of auditory cortex of many mammalians. While the function of A1 has been well documented, the role of AAF in sound related behavioral remain largely unclear. Here in adult rats, sound cued fear conditioning paradigm, surgical ablation, and chemogenetic manipulations were used to examine the role of AAF in fear related sound context recognition. Precise surgical ablation of AAF cannot block sound cued freezing behavior but the fear conditioning became non-selective to acoustic cue. Reversible inhibition of AAF using chemogenetic activation at either training or testing phase can both lead to strong yet non-selective sound cued freezing behavior. These simple yet clear results suggested that in sound cued fear conditioning, sound cue and detailed content in the cue (e.g., frequency) are processed through distinct neural circuits and AAF is a critical part in the cortex dependent pathway. In addition, AAF is needed and playing a gating role for precise recognition of sound content in fear conditioning task through inhibiting fear to harmless cues.

Cellular and Widefield Imaging of Sound Frequency Organization in Primary and Higher Order Fields of the Mouse Auditory Cortex.

The mouse auditory cortex (ACtx) contains two core fields-primary auditory cortex (A1) and anterior auditory field (AAF)-arranged in a mirror reversal tonotopic gradient. The best frequency (BF) organization and naming scheme for additional higher order fields remain a matter of debate, as does the correspondence between smoothly varying global tonotopy and heterogeneity in local cellular tuning. Here, we performed chronic widefield and two-photon calcium imaging from the ACtx of awake Thy1-GCaMP6s reporter mice. Data-driven parcellation of widefield maps identified five fields, including a previously unidentified area at the ventral posterior extreme of the ACtx (VPAF) and a tonotopically organized suprarhinal auditory field (SRAF) that extended laterally as far as ectorhinal cortex. Widefield maps were stable over time, where single pixel BFs fluctuated by less than 0.5 octaves throughout a 1-month imaging period. After accounting for neuropil signal and frequency tuning strength, BF organization in neighboring layer 2/3 neurons was intermediate to the heterogeneous salt and pepper organization and the highly precise local organization that have each been described in prior studies. Multiscale imaging data suggest there is no ultrasonic field or secondary auditory cortex in the mouse. Instead, VPAF and a dorsal posterior (DP) field emerged as the strongest candidates for higher order auditory areas.

Evidence of Hyperacusis in Adult Rats Following Non-traumatic Sound Exposure.

Manipulations that enhance neuroplasticity may inadvertently create opportunities for maladaptation. We have previously used passive exposures to non-traumatic white noise to open windows of plasticity in the adult rat auditory cortex and induce frequency-specific functional reorganizations of the tonotopic map. However, similar reorganizations in the central auditory pathway are thought to contribute to the generation of hearing disorders such as tinnitus and hyperacusis. Here, we investigate whether noise-induced reorganizations are accompanied by electrophysiological or behavioral evidence of tinnitus or hyperacusis in adult Long-Evans rats. We used a 2-week passive exposure to moderate-intensity (70 dB SPL) broadband white noise to reopen a critical period for spectral tuning such that a second 1-week exposure to 7 kHz tone pips produced an expansion of the 7 kHz frequency region in the primary auditory cortex (A1). We demonstrate for the first time that this expansion also takes place in the ventral auditory field (VAF). Sound exposure also led to spontaneous and sound-evoked hyperactivity in the anterior auditory field (AAF). Rats were assessed for behavioral evidence of tinnitus or hyperacusis using gap and tone prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response. We found that sound exposure did not affect gap-prepulse inhibition. However, sound exposure led to an improvement in prepulse inhibition when the prepulse was a 7 kHz tone, showing that exposed rats had enhanced sensorimotor gating for the exposure frequency. Together, our electrophysiological and behavioral results provide evidence of hyperacusis but not tinnitus in sound-exposed animals. Our findings demonstrate that periods of prolonged noise exposure may open windows of plasticity that can also be understood as windows of vulnerability, potentially increasing the likelihood for maladaptive plasticity to take place.

Effects of developmental noise exposure on inhibitory cell densities and perineuronal nets in A1 and AAF of mice

Within the auditory cortex, there are two primary-like regions considered to be ‘core’ cortical fields, the primary auditory cortex (A1) and the anterior auditory field (AAF). Both fields have sharp frequency tuning, tonotopic organization, and inputs from the ventral division of the medial geniculate body of the thalamus. AAF seems to be more specialized for faster spectrotemporal processing than A1, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. A1 has been studied extensively in developmental plasticity, but how AAF changes with developmental experience is less clear. To address potential cellular correlates of processing differences between the two fields, we used immunohistochemistry to quantify the density of GABA, parvalbumin (PV), and somatostatin (SOM) cells in A1 and AAF of mice. We also compared the density of perineuronal nets (PNN) between A1 and AAF. PNNs are a specialized assembly of extracellular matrix involved in network maturation and plasticity. Finally, we compared the effects of developmental noise exposure on inhibitory and PNN cell density in these two core regions. In adult mice, there were more PV cells and PNNs surrounding cell bodies in AAF than in A1. Moderate level noise exposure during early development leads to 1) increased GABA and SOM cell density in both A1 and AAF, and 2) decreased PNN cell density in A1, but not AAF. Inhibitory cells without PNN appear to be more susceptible to changes following developmental noise exposure in both fields. Deep layers (5/6) are more susceptible to change in PNN density compared to superficial layers (1–4) of A1. Results are consistent with altered cortical gain control models and impaired maturation of cortex in response to noisy environments, and suggest that PNNs may be more prone to modification in A1 than AAF.

Distinct processing of tone offset in two primary auditory cortices

In the rodent auditory system, the primary cortex is subdivided into two regions, both receiving direct inputs from the auditory thalamus: the primary auditory cortex (A1) and the anterior auditory field (AAF). Although neurons in the two regions display different response properties, like response latency, firing threshold or tuning bandwidth, it is still not clear whether they process sound in a distinct way. Using in vivo electrophysiological recordings in the mouse auditory cortex, we found that AAF neurons have significantly stronger responses to tone offset than A1 neurons. AAF neurons also display faster and more transient responses than A1 neurons. Additionally, offset responses in AAF – unlike in A1, increase with sound duration. Local field potential (LFP) and laminar analyses suggest that the differences in sound responses between these two primary cortices are both of subcortical and intracortical origin. These results emphasize the potentially critical role of AAF for temporal processing. Our study reveals a distinct role of two primary auditory cortices in tone processing and highlights the complexity of sound encoding at the cortical level.

Pairing vagus nerve stimulation with tones drives plasticity across the auditory pathway.

Previous studies have demonstrated that pairing vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) with sounds can enhance the primary auditory cortex (A1) response to the paired sound. The neural response to sounds following VNS-sound pairing in other subcortical and cortical auditory fields has not been documented. We predicted that VNS-tone pairing would increase neural responses to the paired tone frequency across the auditory pathway. In this study, we paired VNS with the presentation of a 9-kHz tone 300 times a day for 20 days. We recorded neural responses to tones from 2,950 sites in the inferior colliculus (IC), A1, anterior auditory field (AAF), and posterior auditory field (PAF) 24 h after the last pairing session in anesthetized rats. We found that VNS-tone pairing increased the percentage of IC, A1, AAF, and PAF that responds to the paired tone frequency. Across all tested auditory fields, the response strength to tones was strengthened in VNS-tone paired rats compared with control rats. VNS-tone pairing reduced spontaneous activity, frequency selectivity, and response threshold across the auditory pathway. This is the first study to document both cortical and subcortical plasticity following VNS-sound pairing. Our findings suggest that VNS paired with sound presentation is an effective method to enhance auditory processing.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous studies have reported primary auditory cortex plasticity following vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with a sound. This study extends previous findings by documenting that fields across the auditory pathway are altered by VNS-tone pairing. VNS-tone pairing increases the percentage of each field that responds to the paired tone frequency. This is the first study to document both cortical and subcortical plasticity following VNS-sound pairing.