Antenatal Hepatitis Research Articles

Understanding current antenatal Hepatitis C testing and care in maternity services in England.

Universal opt-out antenatal screening for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is not currently recommened and it is recommended that maternity services offer risk-based testing. We aimed to investigate antenatal HCV testing and adherence to testing guidance. A cross-sectional survey was circulated to maternity service providers between November-December 2020 which included testing policy, training for healthcare staff, and management of women found to be HCV positive. Descriptive data are presented. A total of 75 questionnaires were returned, representing 48 % of English maternity service providers. 87 % of providers reported offering antenatal HCV risk-based testing. Risk factors used to identify pregnant women for testing varied. Less than 15 % of respondents considered women that were ever homeless or with history of incarceraton or from higher HCV prevalence areas as high risk. Current antenatal HCV testing practices are inadequate and HCV infection likely goes undiagnosed in pregnancy, especially among vulnerable population groups. In the absence of universal antenatal screening, re-framing antenatal HCV risk-based testing and management as a quality improvement initiative and developing HCV specific pathway guidance for maternity units is required.

Modelling the potential clinical and economic impact of universal antenatal hepatitis C (HCV) screening and providing treatment for pregnant women with HCV and their infants in Egypt: a cost-effectiveness study

Backgrounds and aimsPregnant women and children are not included in Egypt’s hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination programmes. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of several screening and treatment strategies for pregnant...

Feasibility and Acceptability of Antenatal Hepatitis C Screening: A Pilot Study.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is not currently included in the United Kingdom routine antenatal screening program, but the latest guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and Infectious Diseases Society of America recommend HCV screening for all pregnant women during each pregnancy. The aim of this study was to collect qualitative data on the feasibility and acceptability of antenatal HCV screening in pregnant women at the time of routine antenatal screening at 12 weeks, to estimate patient knowledge about HCV and identify the prevalence of HCV infection in antenatal women. This was a pilot study targeting a single hospital-based antenatal clinic in Birmingham, initially conducted for eight weeks with a further extension of the study period to enhance recruitment to meet the feasibility target of 500 patients. Data collected included demographic and epidemiological details. Pregnant women attending the antenatal unit were given information regarding HCV and antenatal screening for HCV prior to their initial antenatal visit. During the antenatal visit, research nurses provided further information about the study and HCV infection. Consent was obtained for taking part in the study and testing for HCV using blood samples taken at the same time as other routine antenatal screening blood tests. All women who agreed to participate in the study were asked to complete an acceptability and knowledge questionnaire. All women had HCV antibody testing as the primary screening assay. The test result was communicated in writing to the women and their general practitioner. Confirmatory positive antibody tests were followed up with quantitative HCV PCR and genotype analysis. The outcomes of testing were no evidence of HCV infection and evidence of past HCV infection or current HCV infection. Five hundred and forty-nine women were approached in the antenatal clinic; 30 women refused consent while 29 women were excluded from the study (blood tests not performed after consenting, age less than 18 years, and consent form lost). Four hundred and ninety women were included in the study. The median age of the study population was 29 years (range, 18-46). Knowledge about blood-borne viruses was limited; 75% of women had some understanding about antenatal hepatitis B (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing. Previous awareness about hepatitis C was reported by 55%. Ninety-one percent of women found the information they were given about hepatitis C helpful. Ninety-six percent of the women included in this study found the counselling they received about HCV useful and felt that the delivery of this information was carried out in an acceptable manner. Once given information about HCV, 99% felt that universal screening for HCV should be implemented. HCV antibody was negative in 489 women. One patient with a positive HCV antibody (prevalence: 0.2%) had a negative HCV PCR. Routine antenatal screening for HCV is not currently recommended in the UK. Our study suggests that antenatal HCV screening would be both feasible and acceptable to most pregnant women attending antenatal clinics. Though the awareness of HCV was low, with appropriate counselling and communication, 99% of pregnant women were in favor of antenatal screening for HCV. Antenatal screening would identify HCV-positive mothers and allow follow-up of their infants so that any infected mothers and infants could be offered effective curative therapy and prevent the progression of liver disease. The inclusion of HCV antenatal screening would complete the blood-borne virus profile and enhance the WHO target to eliminate HCV in the UK.

A rapid review of antenatal hepatitis C virus testing in the United Kingdom

BackgroundThe United Kingdom (UK) has committed to the World Health Organization’s viral hepatitis elimination targets. New case finding strategies, such as antenatal testing, may be needed to achieve these targets. We conducted a rapid review to understand hepatitis C-specific antibody (anti-HCV) and HCV RNA test positivity in antenatal settings in the United Kingdom to inform guidance.MethodsArticles and conference abstracts published between January 2000 and June 2022 reporting anti-HCV testing in antenatal settings were identified through PubMed and Web of Science searches. Results were synthesised using a narrative approach.ResultsThe search identified 2,011 publications; 10 studies were included in the final synthesis. Seven studies used anonymous testing methods and three studies used universal opt-out testing. Anti-HCV test positivity ranged from 0.1 to 0.99%, with a median value of 0.38%. Five studies reported HCV RNA positivity, which ranged from 0.1 to 0.57% of the testing population, with a median value of 0.22%. One study reported cost effectiveness of HCV and found it to be cost effective at £9,139 per quality adjusted life years.ConclusionThe relative contribution of universal opt-out antenatal testing for HCV should be reconsidered, as antenatal testing could play an important role in new case-finding and aid achieving elimination targets.

Antenatal hepatitis B virus sero-prevalence, risk factors, pregnancy outcomes and vertical transmission rate within 24 months after birth in a high HIV prevalence setting

BackgroundDespite the availability of an effective vaccine, chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections remain a major cause of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. HBV burden in pregnancy, risk factors and the timing of mother to child transmission remain poorly described especially during this era of lifelong use of Tenofovir/Lamivudine/Efavirenz as firstline for HIV treatment. We aimed to determine the burden of HBV in pregnancy and infants receiving their first dose of HBV vaccine 6 weeks after birth in a high HIV-prevalence setting.MethodsPregnant women ≥ 20 weeks’ gestational age were enrolled and followed up as mother-infant dyads from delivery, 6, 24 and 96 weeks after birth. HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) was tested (fresh plasma, immunochromatography) in pregnancy. Women testing HBsAg-seropositive were further evaluated for other four HBV-biomarkers. Maternally HBV exposed babies were tested for HBsAg from birth and HBs-antibodies from 6 months of age. Maternal-infant factors were tested in univariable and multivariable analyses for predictors of HBsAg-seropositivity.Results Six hundred HIV-uninfected and 608 HIV-infected women on Tenofovir/Lamivudine/Efavirenz-regimen with median (interquartile range) 350: (87–1477) days of therapy use were enrolled. The overall HBsAg-seroprevalence was 32/1208: 2.65%, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.74, 3.55]; being 7/600: 1.17%, 95% CI [0.37, 1.97] and 25/608: 4.11%, 95% CI [2.52, 5.68] in HBsAg-monoinfected and HBsAg/HIV-coinfected respectively, disproportionately detected in 31/32: 96.9%, 95% CI [90.8, 100] women presumably HBV-unvaccinated in infancy.HBV exposed babies tended to be born prematurely (< 37 weeks); 15.2% versus 9.9% in the HBV-unexposed, p = 0.009.In multivariate logistic regression-models with variable elimination, HIV-infection and reported tooth extractions predicted antenatal HBsAg-seropositivity; odds ratios (CI): 3.85 (1.61–10.7) and 2.46 (1.07–5.34), respectively.None of the exposed infants were HBsAg-seropositive neither before nor after 6 weeks of age. No HBs-antibodies were detected in 23.3% of HBsAg-exposed infants at two years despite having successfully completed the HBV vaccination schedule.ConclusionLow and moderate HBV endemics were observed in HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected pregnant women, respectively. This underscores the need to routinely screen for HBV in pregnancy, especially the HIV-infected attending antenatal-care. Being HIV-infected and reported tooth extractions were independent risk factors for maternal HBsAg-seropositivity. Vertical and child horizontal transmissions were both absent, probably due to ~ the 50% frequency of antenatal anti-HBe-antibodies observed. Of concern was the absence of anti-HBs-antibodies in 23.3% of fully vaccinated/maternally HBV-exposed infants by two years. Absence of molecular diagnosis may have underestimated HBV burden.Trial registrationwww.clinicaltrials.gov, trial registration number: NCT04087239.

Characteristics of women presenting with hepatitis B at antenatal care services in London, 2008-2018.

To support interventions to prevent mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B and fill gaps in surveillance, the Enhanced Surveillance of Antenatal Hepatitis B (ESAHB) programme was implemented in London from 2008 to 2018 to collect demographic information on women who tested positive for hepatitis B during antenatal screening. We describe the epidemiology of hepatitis B in pregnancy, as reported to ESAHB. The characteristics of pregnant women living with hepatitis B were described and rates were calculated by year, local authority and residence deprivation decile (1 being most deprived). Poisson regression tested the association between pregnant women living with hepatitis B and deprivation decile. Between 2008 and 2018, 8879 women living with hepatitis B in London (0.35 per 1000 women) reported 11 193 pregnancies. Annual hepatitis B rates remained stable, but there was strong evidence for an inverse association between rate and deprivation decile (P<0.001). The majority of women in the cohort presented late to antenatal care, were born outside the UK in a hepatitis B endemic area or required an interpreter for consultations. ESAHB provided important data to inform service quality improvements for women living with hepatitis B. This analysis highlights the link between deprivation and hepatitis B.

Enduring Challenges despite Progress in Preventing Mother-to-Child Transmission of Hepatitis B Virus in Angola.

Sub-Saharan Africa has one of the highest rates of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection globally, with an incidence of 1.5 million and 0.8 million yearly deaths, which drives synergistic efforts towards its elimination. To assess the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HBV infection, a cross-sectional study was conducted on 1012 pregnant women in Angola to investigate HBV serological and molecular profiles. The prevalence of HBV was 8.7% (n = 88), with hepatitis B core IgM antibody (anti-HBc IgM) positivity identified in 12.8%, hepatitis B “e” antigen (HBeAg) positivity in 30%, and HBV DNA ≥ 200,000 IU/mL in 28.2%. Family tracking studied 44 children, of which 11 (25%) received at least two doses of the hepatitis B vaccine. HBV was detected in 10/44 (22.7%) children, with vaccination reported in one infected child. Further testing identified anti-HBc IgM positivity in 3/10 (30%), HBeAg positivity in 55%, and both seromarkers in 20%. The results revealed the importance of antenatal HBV screening, antiviral prophylaxis for mothers with high viral loads or HBeAg positivity, and timely first-dose hepatitis B vaccines in newborns. Anti-HBc IgM positivity among pregnant women and children highlights prophylactic measures worth considering, including antenatal hepatitis B vaccination and catch-up vaccination to young children.

Antenatal hepatitis B screening in Nigeria: A comparative analysis with syphilis and HIV.

Nigeria has adopted routine screening of pregnant women for hepatitis B virus (HBV) as part of the interventions to eliminate its vertical transmission. However, there is a dearth of evidence on the coverage of routine antenatal HBV screening as recommended in the national guidelines. This study examined the antenatal HBV screening rate and the positivity rate compared with syphilis and HIV. We conducted a descriptive analysis of the 2019 national HIV/AIDS health sector data. The study included approximately 2.8 million pregnant women who received antenatal care (ANC) in over 6000 health facilities providing prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV services in Nigeria. Of the ANC clients, 0.2 million (7.2%) were screened for HBV. At the zonal level, the South West had the highest HBV screening rate (19%), while the lowest rate was in the North East (2.5%). The percentage of pregnant women screened for HBV was lower than those screened for syphilis (16.3%) and HIV (90.3%). Among those screened for HBV, the positivity rate was 5%. The HBV positivity rate ranged from 8.5% in the North Central zone to 1.3% in the South East zone. The positivity rates for syphilis and HIV were 0.4% and 0.5%, respectively. Our results indicate a low antenatal HBV screening rate and a wide disparity compared with HIV and syphilis. This finding highlights the need to understand and address the barriers affecting routine antenatal HBV screening and to strengthen the integration of HBV services into the HIV program in Nigeria.

Progress Toward Hepatitis B Control - World Health Organization European Region, 2016-2019.

In 2019, an estimated 14 million persons in the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region* (EUR) were chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), and approximately 43,000 of these persons died from complications of chronic HBV infection (1). In 2016, the WHO Regional Office for Europe set hepatitis B control program targets for 2020, including 1) ≥90% coverage with 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB3), 2) ≥90% coverage with interventions to prevent mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HBV,† and 3) ≤0.5% prevalence of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)§ in age groups eligible for vaccination with hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) (2-4). This report describes the progress made toward hepatitis B control in EUR during 2016-2019. By December 2019, 50 (94%) of 53 countries in EUR provided routine vaccination with HepB to all infants or children aged 1-12 years (universal HepB), including 23 (43%) countries that offered hepatitis B birth dose (HepB-BD) to all newborns. In addition, 35 (73%) of the 48 countries with universal infant HepB vaccination reached ≥90% HepB3 coverage annually during 2017-2019, and 19 (83%) of the 23 countries with universal birth dose administration achieved ≥90% timely HepB-BD coverage¶ annually during that period. Antenatal hepatitis B screening coverage was ≥90% in 17 (57%) of 30 countries that selectively provided HepB-BD to infants born to mothers with positive HBsAg test results. In January 2020, Italy and the Netherlands became the first counties in EUR to be validated to have achieved the regional hepatitis B control targets. Countries can accelerate progress toward hepatitis B control by improving coverage with HepB and interventions to prevent MTCT and documenting achievement of the HBsAg seroprevalence target through representative serosurveys or, in low-endemicity countries, antenatal screening.

Hepatitis B virus infection among pregnant women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of prevalence studies

BackgroundThere are several epidemiological studies available on hepatitis B virus among pregnant women in Ethiopia. These individual studies revealed wide variation over time and across geographical areas. The aim of this systematic review and Meta-analysis is to estimate the overall prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection among pregnant women in Ethiopia.MethodsA comprehensive search of electronic databases including PubMed, Popline, Lalicus, Ovid, MedNar, African Journal Online (AJOL) and advanced Google Scholar was conducted regardless of publication year from August 30, 2017 to September 25, 2017. The search was updated on January 02, 2018 to minimize time-lag bias. The methodological qualities of included studies were assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instruments.ResultsOut of 103 studies, 17 studies with a total of 5629 pregnant women were included in the Meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection among pregnant women using random-effect model was 4.7%(95% CI 4.0–5.4%). The I2 statistics was I2 = 37.9%(p = 0.0575). Even though significant heterogeneity among studies was not detected, the I2 = 37.9% suggests medium heterogeneity. A subgroup Meta-analysis showed that study site, region, mean/median sample size, hepatitis B virus screening methods and methodological quality were not source of heterogeneity (p-difference > 0.05).ConclusionThis review shows an intermediate level of hepatitis B virus infection among pregnant women in Ethiopia. In addition to the current practice of child vaccination, routine and universal antenatal hepatitis B virus screening program need to be implemented.

Antenatal hepatitis B and increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus – Implications for obstetric care

Antenatal hepatitis B and increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus – Implications for obstetric care

Vertical transmission of hepatitis C: towards universal antenatal screening in the era of new direct acting antivirals (DAAs)? Short review and analysis of the situation in Switzerland

At present, routine antenatal hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening is not recommended in pregnant women who do not have known risk factors for infection. The main reason for this attitude has been the lack of effective treatment options to avoid mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) during pregnancy or delivery. Hitherto available treatment regimens based on interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) were associated with sometimes long-lasting and severe side-effects and thus their indication had to be carefully evaluated. In addition, ribavirin has teratogenic and embryocidal effects and is absolutely contraindicated during pregnancy. The situation has substantially changed with the advent of the newly available treatment regimens based on very effective and well-tolerated direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs). The aim of this viewpoint is to briefly analyse, using the example of Switzerland, how recent developments in HCV therapy might impact prevention of HCV vertical transmission.

Health Care Disparity in Delivering Optimal Care to Chronic Hepatitis B Pregnant Mothers

Introduction: Roughly 24,000 chronic hepatitis B (CHB) pregnant women give birth in United States every year. Since perinatal acquisition of CHB contributes significantly to prevalence of CHB, it becomes imperative to provide optimal antenatal care to these mothers. We determined if health care disparities exist in antenatal care of CHB pregnant mothers at a large integrated health care system in United States. Methods: Retrospective study (January 2005- June 2010) at a large integrated health care system in Southern California. All CHB pregnant mothers identified using the regional perinatal database. Inclusion criteria: age > 18 years and positive serum HBsAg (hepatitis B surface antigen). They were excluded if tested negative for HBsAg; tested positive for preliminary enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) HBsAg but had non-reactive HBsAg neutralization confirmatory antibody assay (false positive); termination of pregnancy or lost to follow up. Only first live-birth pregnancy was considered for CHB mothers who delivered more than once during the study timeline. Chart review was performed to determine maternal antenatal hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg) serology, antenatal hepatitis B virus (HBV) viral load and specialist consultation visits. Results: A total of 462 CHB pregnant mothers were identified. The mean maternal age in years was 32.5 ± 4.8 (range 18-45, median 33). Highest prevalence of CHB was noted in Asian Pacific Islander mothers (78.8%), followed by non-Hispanic white (9.7%), Hispanic white (5.8%), non-Hispanic black (5.2%) and Hispanic black (0.4%). Antenatal hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg) serology testing was performed in 274 (59.3%) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) viral load was tested in 156 (33.8%) mother only. Only 93 (20.1%) mothers had a specialist consultation during their pregnancy. Among these 93 mothers, 90 consulted gastroenterologist and 3 hepatologist. Additionally 104 (26.2%) infants born to these CHB mothers had no HBsAg serological testing at 9-18 months follow up. Conclusion: Significant health care disparities in standard care of CHB pregnant mothers identified at a large integrated health care system in United States.

Is antenatal screening for hepatitis C virus cost-effective? A decade’s experience at a London centre

This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of a routine universal antenatal hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening programme at a London centre. Ten years' retrospective antenatal screening and outcome data informed a cost-effectiveness analysis using the previously validated MONARCH model. The cost and quality of life outcomes associated with the screening and treatment of newly identified hepatitis C cases were used to generate cost-effectiveness estimates for the screening programme. A total of 35,355 women were screened between 1st November 2003 and 1st March 2013; 136 women (0.38%) were found to be HCV antibody positive. Of 78 (0.22%) viraemic cases, 44 (0.12%) were newly diagnosed. In addition, the screening programme identified three (6.8%) vertical transmissions in children of newly diagnosed mothers. Of 16 newly diagnosed mothers biopsied, all were in the F0-F2 METAVIR disease stages, and 50% had HCV genotype 1. Postnatal treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin was initiated in 19 women, with 14 (74%) achieving sustained virologic response. The total cost of screening and confirmation of diagnoses was estimated to be £240,641. This translates to £5469 per newly diagnosed individual. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of this screening and treatment strategy was £2400 per QALY gained. Treatment with newer direct-acting antiviral regimens would have a projected cost of £9139 per QALY gained, well below the £20,000-30,000/QALY gained willingness-to-pay threshold applied by policy advisory bodies. This study demonstrates that an antenatal screening and treatment programme is feasible and effective, at a cost considered acceptable.

Antenatal hepatitis B in a large teaching NHS Trust – Implications for future care

To establish the workload expected as a result of introducing antenatal antivirals for the prevention of vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus. Retrospective review of all HBsAg-positive women and their infants, between 2005 and 2011, in a large (population 1 million) teaching NHS Trust in Leicester, UK, a highly ethnically diverse city. 7% of pregnancies occurred in women who were taking, or would now be recommended to take, antenatal antivirals. 176 infants were born to 140 HBsAg-positive women through 172 pregnancies (mean 29 pregnancies/year). Two (1.1%) were vertically infected, including one born to a mother with HBeAg(-)/HBeAb(+) disease and HBV viral load 2 million IU/ml who would not currently be recommended for antenatal antivirals. 81.1% infants completed all HBV vaccinations; 79.5% completed serology testing. 96.4% women were referred to the hepatitis clinic, but 30% disengaged from clinic follow-up, with no significant difference between ethnic groups in terms of maternal disengagement, or failure to complete infant vaccinations or serology testing. Only a small percentage of HBsAg-positive women are likely to meet the newly published criteria for antenatal anti-viral treatment. Strengthened community engagement across multiple ethnic groups is of paramount importance to improve maternal and infant outcomes.

Hepatitis B and HIV co-infection in pregnant women: indication for routine antenatal hepatitis B virus screening in a high HIV prevalence setting.

Sub-Saharan Africa is endemic for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections. HBV/HIV co-infection in women of reproductive age is of clinical and public health importance because these women constitute a significant reservoir for horizontal and perinatal HBV transmission. Childhood HBV vaccination from 6 weeks of age protects most children against chronic HBV infection. However, infants born to HBV/HIV co-infected women are more likely to be infected perinatally, with an increased risk of chronic hepatitis, than infants born to HBV mono-infected women. The aim of our study was to establish the prevalence of HBV infection and HBV/HIV co-infection in pregnant women in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, to inform antenatal HBV screening and childhood immunisation policies in South Africa. Stored plasma specimens obtained from 570 pregnant women were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV infectivity, as characterised by the presence of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and/or HBV DNA load. The antenatal HIV prevalence and HBsAg prevalence in this study were 41.6% and 5.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.4 - 7.1), respectively. Overall, 3.1% (95% CI 1.7 - 4.6) of pregnant women were HBV/HIV co-infected, with HBeAg positivity and the HBV DNA load being significantly higher in co-infected women. We report a 5.3% HBV prevalence and a 3.1% HBV/HIV co-infection prevalence in pregnant women from this HIV-endemic region. Routine antenatal HBV screening will allow early identification of neonates who require HBV active-passive immunoprophylaxis at birth. This strategy, together with antenatal antiretrovirals, will reduce the risk of perinatal HBV transmission, especially in high-risk HBV/ HIV co-infected pregnant women.

Epidemiology and Clinical Features of Childhood Chronic Hepatitis B Infection Diagnosed in England

This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of childhood chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection diagnosed in England using capture-recapture analysis of 2 independent data sources and to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics, management, complications and outcome of children with CHB. Pediatric specialists were contacted to report all CHB cases in children aged <16 years and complete a standardized questionnaire. Capture-recapture analysis of cases diagnosed during 2001-2009 using 2 independent data sources was performed to estimate the prevalence of childhood CHB. Capture-recapture analysis estimated 448 diagnosed CHB cases (prevalence, 4.6/100,000) in England, of whom only 44% had been referred for specialist follow up. Clinical information for 325 cases under specialist care revealed that half the cases (n = 164, 50%) had been born overseas, mainly Sub-Saharan Africa and Eastern Europe, whereas half the UK-born children were either Pakistani (25%) or Chinese (25%). Most children (n = 216, 66%) were asymptomatic, with only 60 (18.5%) ever receiving any antiviral therapy, although 2 developed cirrhosis in childhood and 1 hepatocellular carcinoma. Horizontal transmission among UK-born children was identified in only 3 children born since 2001, when universal antenatal hepatitis B virus screening was introduced. Most children born to antenatally diagnosed hepatitis B virus-positive mothers (49/51, 96%) had received at least 1 hepatitis B vaccine dose after birth. In England, the prevalence of diagnosed childhood CHB is low, although the potential number of undiagnosed cases is difficult to estimate. Further efforts are required to strengthen the current antenatal screening program and newly diagnosed cases should be referred for specialist follow up.

Missed opportunities for prevention of perinatal transmission of hepatitis B: a retrospective cohort study.

Perinatal transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) can occur despite postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). Recent literature suggests that antiviral treatment during pregnancy when maternal HBV DNA levels are elevated can further decrease vertical transmission. However, HBV DNA screening is not routinely performed antenatally. To determine the rates of HBV prevalence and perinatal transmission in an antenatal cohort. A retrospective review of public health records (December 2008 to December 2010) was performed for both mothers and newborns. A total of 725 mother-infant pairs were included. Of these, 574 of 715 (80%) women had antenatal hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) testing performed, and 127 of 574 (22%) were HBeAg positive (HBeAg+). Of babies born to hepatitis B surface antigen-positive (HBsAg+) mothers, only 573 of 725 (79%) received complete PEP. In addition, 172 of 725 (24%) infants did not receive post-PEP blood testing or were lost to follow-up. Of the 552 infants with results available, seven cases (1.3%) of mother-to-child HBV transmission were observed, six of which involved infants born to HBeAg+ women. Our findings suggest that routine HBeAg screening could identify a subset of mother-infant pairs among HBsAg+ pregnant women who are at higher risk for vertical HBV transmission. Determination of viral load in expectant HBeAg+ mothers may provide more precise insight into HBV transmission to their infants.

Antenatal hepatitis b testing as a marker of quality performance of a laboratory

Quality assurance programs (QAP) provide management with confidence in the accuracy and precision of results reported from their laboratory. Laboratory accreditation by National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA) ensures there are quality systems in place that relate to documentation of techniques and systems of checking processes as well as consistency of reporting accurate results. This overview of the last 2 years of Antenatal Hepatitis B Surface Antigen QAP identifies the common errors, both critical and less critical, while reflecting on the response of errant laboratories to improve their performance. Critical errors have an immediate impact on the patient and include false positive or negative results as well as transcriptions errors and mix-up of specimens (specimen reversal). Other errors, although they may not have an immediate impact on patient results, can still be viewed as a quality system failure and should be investigated with action taken to correct the error and avoid similar errors in future. Other common errors include incorrect cutoff values, incorrect units, expired kits and incorrect lot number information. The Antenatal Hepatitis B QAP covers screening assays for hepatitis B surface antigen, and associated supplemental and confirmatory assays. The importance of reporting these results correctly is paramount for the care of both the mother and infant and a false result, either positive or negative may result in inappropriate management of these patients.

Obstetric management of hepatitis C-positive mothers: analysis of vertical transmission in 559 mother-infant pairs

The objective of the study was to determine vertical transmission rates of hepatitis C in 2 tertiary level maternity units. This was a retrospective review of all hepatitis C-positive mothers and their pregnancy outcomes. Of 74,629 deliveries, 559 liveborn infants were born to 545 hepatitis C mothers; the rate of antenatal hepatitis C infection was 0.7%. In the neonatal period, 423 infants tested negative for hepatitis C ribonucleic acid (RNA) (75.7%), 18 were positive (3.2%), and 118 infants were not tested or were lost to follow-up (21.1%). The overall vertical transmission rate is 18 of 441 (4.1%, 95% confidence interval 2.3% to 5.9%). The vertical transmission rate for infants following vaginal delivery or emergency cesarean in labor was no different when compared with those delivered by planned cesarean (4.2% vs 3.0%, P = NS). Among women in whom hepatitis C RNA was detected antenatally, this finding remained (7.2% vs 5.3%, P = NS). No case of vertical transmission was noted among hepatitis C RNA-negative mothers. This study reports a vertical transmission rate for hepatitis C of 4.1%. These results do not support a recommendation of planned cesarean to reduce vertical transmission of hepatitis C infection.