Antegrade Dissection Re-entry Research Articles

Racial disparities in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the PROGRESS-CTO registry.

There is limited data on race and outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The authors sought to evaluate CTO PCI techniques and outcomes in different racial groups. We examined the baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes of 11 806 CTO PCIs performed at 44 US and non-US centers between 2012 and March 2023. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) included death, myocardial infarction, repeat target-vessel revascularization, pericardiocentesis, cardiac surgery, and stroke prior to discharge. The most common racial group was White (84.5%), followed by Black (5.7%), "Other" (3.9%), Hispanic (2.9%), Asian (2.4%), and Native American (0.7%). There were significant differences in the baseline characteristics between different racial groups. When compared with non-White patients, the retrograde approach and antegrade dissection re-entry were more likely to be the successful crossing strategies in White patients without any significant differences in technical success (86.4% vs 86.4%; P = .93), procedural success (84.8% vs 85.0%; P = .79), and in-hospital MACE (2.0% vs 1.5%; P = .15) between the 2 groups. The technical success rate was significantly higher in the "Other" racial group (91.0% vs 86.4% in White, 86.9% in Asian, 84.5% in Black, 84.5% in Hispanic, and 83.3% in Native American; P = .03) without any significant differences in procedural success or in-hospital MACE rates between the groups. Despite differences in baseline characteristics and procedural techniques, the procedural success and in-hospital MACE of CTO PCI were not significantly different between most racial groups.

Device-based antegrade dissection re-entry versus parallel wire techniques for the percutaneous revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions.

Device-based antegrade dissection re-entry (ADR) and parallel wire technique (PWT) are two important techniques in the antegrade approach in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO). The study is aimed to compare the procedural and mid-term outcomes between device-based ADR using the CrossBoss/Stingray system and PWT in CTO PCI. Data was retrospectively collected from consecutive patients who underwent CTO PCI using device-based ADR or PWT. CTO due to in-stent restenosis were excluded. A total of 273 patients were included in the study (n = 55 in device-based ADR group, n = 218 in PWT group). Baseline characteristics were similar across groups except for higher prevalence of prior PCI and lower level of lipid profile in the ADR group. Moreover, although patients in the ADR group showed higher contrast volume (441.6 ± 162.4 mL vs. 361.5 ± 142.1 mL, p < 0.001), more intravascular ultrasound guidance (50.9% vs. 22.9%, p < 0.001), more guidewires used (4.6 ± 1.4 vs. 3.4 ± 1.2, p < 0.001) and higher troponin T level after PCI (0.167 vs. 0.087, p = 0.004), the technical success, procedural success and in-hospital complications were similar between the two groups. During a median follow-up of 1 year, the ADR group showed no difference in major adverse cardiac events (MACE, including all cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia driven target vessel revascularization) (7.3% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.150) as compared with the PWT group. In the documented center, the use of device-based ADR for CTO PCI showed no difference in in-hospital complications and mid-term MACE as compared with PWT, despite higher procedure complexity in ADR group.

Exploring indicators of success in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention with Stingray system-based antegrade dissection re-entry: Insights from retrospective analysis.

The predictors of success of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) using the Stingray system (Stingray ADR) remain elusive, mainly owing to the lack of consecutive angiographic and procedural records of patients. This study aimed to identify indicators that can determine the success of CTO PCI performed using the Stingray ADR technique. The clinical data of 115 patients who underwent CTO PCI through Stingray ADR at the same cardiac center were retrospectively and consecutively collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the indicators of the success of ADR attempts. The technical success rate of Stingray ADR in CTO PCI was 72.2%. The overall technical success rate of CTO recanalization was 78.3% in all CTO PCIs having used Stingray Low Profile balloon. Vessel calcification (odds ratio [OR]: 4.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49-11.88; p = 0.008), and retrograde puncture indicator (OR: 4.89; 95% CI: 1.51-17.11; p = 0.009) were identified as independent positive predictors. Blunt/no stump proximal to the occlusion segment (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.06-0.64; p = 0.009), decision time before Stingray ADR (per 1 h increase) (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.31-0.92; p = 0.026), operation duration of Stingray ADR (per 10 min increase) (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.40-0.94; p = 0.028), and puncture site at the intraplaque region (OR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.06-0.84; p = 0.026) were identified as the four negative independent predictors. This study revealed independent predictors of the success of CTO PCI performed using the Stingray ADR technique. As for CTO characteristics, the presence of calcification in the CTO segment and a tapered stump proximal to the lesion site can facilitate successful Stingray ADR. As for the procedures, the success rate of Stingray ADR can be improved by initiating the technique decisively and promptly, operating the system quickly and accurately and creating a puncture in the distal cap region of CTO under retrograde guidance.

Safety and efficacy of the expressman extension system for complex coronary lesions during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Safety and efficacy of the expressman extension system for complex coronary lesions during percutaneous coronary intervention.

A Novel Parallel Wire-based Antegrade Dissection Re-entry Technique for Failed Retrograde Attempt of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions with Risk Nomogram Analysis.

Rapid development in coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) interventional techniques and devices have achieved a greater success rate with favorable outcomes. Antegrade dissection re-entry (ADR) technique is an important CTO crossing strategy and a desirable approach for long CTOs with good distal landing zone. However, unsuccessful procedures in contemporary CTO-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain, especially in lesions with non-interventional collaterals. Based on a single center experience, a hybrid interventional algorithm, parallel wire-based ADR (PW-ADR) combines the advantages of parallel wire technique (PWT) and device-based ADR to target CTO lesions with failed retrograde approach. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent PW-ADR was performed. A risk nomogram was created to identify patients at high risk for technical failure. A total of 57 patients treated with PW-ADR were ultimately included in the present study. A total of 46 (80.7%) cases achieved technical success and procedural success, with low incidence of in-hospital complications or 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The risk nomogram identified 3 predictor variables associated with technical failure of PW-ADR, including tortuous vessel, J-CTO score, and times of antegrade coronary angiography (CAG) during ADR, with promising accuracy (AUROC 0.947). The novel hybrid CTO-PCI algorithm, PW-ADR, provided an alternative interventional approach for complex CTO lesions with a promising success rate. The risk nomogram served as a prompter for high-risk cases, which may warrant a change in treatment strategy.

Wire-based antegrade dissection re-entry technique for coronary chronic total occlusions percutaneous revascularization: Experience from the ERCTO Registry.

The recent development and widespread adoption of antegrade dissection re-entry (ADR) techniques have been underlined as one of the antegrade strategies in all worldwide CTO consensus documents. However, historical wire-based ADR experience has suffered from disappointing long-term outcomes. Compare technical success, procedural success, and long-term outcome of patients who underwent wire-based ADR technique versus antegrade wiring (AW). One thousand seven hundred and ten patients, from the prospective European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusions (ERCTO), underwent 1806 CTO procedures between January 2018 and December 2021, at 13 high-volume ADR centers. Among all 1806 lesions attempted by the antegrade approach, 72% were approached with AW techniques and 28% with wire-based ADR techniques. Technical and procedural success rates were lower in wire-based ADR than in AW (90.3% vs. 96.4%, p < 0.001; 87.7% vs. 95.4%, p < 0.001, respectively); however, wire-based ADR was used successfully more often in complex lesions as compared to AW (p = 0.017). Wire-based ADR was used in most cases (85%) after failure of AW or retrograde procedures. At a mean clinical follow-up of 21 ± 15 months, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) did not differ between AW and wire-based ADR (12% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.106); both AW and wire-based ADR procedures were associated with significant symptomimprovements. As compared to AW, wire-based ADR is a reliable and effective strategy successfully used in more complex lesions and often after the failure of other techniques. At long-term follow-up, patient's MACCEs and symptoms improvement were similar in both antegrade techniques.

STAR procedure becomes SAFER: First-in-man case series of a new antegrade dissection re-entry technique.

Antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) is an integral part of the hybrid algorithm, which has allowed for improved outcomes in chronic total occlusion (CTO) coronary intervention (PCI). A new ADR method, Subintimal Antegrade FEnestration and Re-entry (SAFER), is described. The results of a first-in-man series are presented. SAFER was performed on seven consecutive patients with angiographic and clinical success in all patients. This first-in-man study has shown that the SAFER technique is feasible and effective with the possibility of improving the antegrade PCI CTO success rate.

Changes in coronary collateral function after successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.

Contemporary chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) incorporates wire escalation and dissection/re-entry recanalisation strategies. The purpose of the study was to investigate changes in collateral function after CTO PCI and to identify whether the mode of successful recanalisation influences collateral function regression. Patients scheduled for elective CTO PCI with evidence of viability in the CTO territory by noninvasive imaging were included in this study. After successful CTO PCI, the aortic pressure (Pa) and distal coronary artery wedge pressure (Pw) during balloon occlusion were measured, both in a resting state and during infusion of intravenous adenosine, allowing the calculation of the pressure-derived collateral pressure index at rest and hyperaemia (CPIrest and the collateral fractional flow reserve [FFRcoll], respectively). Measurements were repeated 3 months later during angiographic follow-up. Eighty-one patients had physiological measurements at baseline and follow-up. In the final cohort the mean age was 64 years and 82% were male. The mean maximal stent diameter and total stent length were 3.2±0.5 mm and 68±31 mm, respectively. Successful strategies were antegrade wiring (64.2%), antegrade dissection re-entry (8.6%), and retrograde dissection re-entry (27.1%). Between the index procedure and follow-up, wedge pressure decreased from 34±11 mmHg to 21±8.5 mmHg (p<0.01), respectively. FFRcoll changed from 0.34±0.11 to 0.19±0.09 (p<0.01) at follow-up and CPIrest from 0.40±0.14 to 0.17±0.09 (p<0.01). Absolute maximum collateral flow decreased from 55±32 ml/min directly after PCI to 38±24 ml/min (p<0.01). There was no relation between the recanalisation technique and changes in FFRcoll. There was a significant reduction in collateral flow over time, independent of the recanalisation technique.

Abstract 11505: Predicting In-Hospital All-Cause Mortality in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: PROGRESS-CTO Mortality Score

Introduction: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with increased risk of periprocedural complications. Estimating the risk of complications facilitates risk-benefit assessment and procedural planning. Methods: We analyzed the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS-CTO, NCT02061436) and created a risk score for in-hospital all-cause mortality. Logistic regression prediction modeling was used to identify independently associated variables and the model was internally validated with bootstrapping. Results: Of the 10,480 CTO PCI cases performed between 2012-2022 at 40 US and non-US centers, in-hospital mortality occurred in 47 (0.45%). The final prediction model identified 4 independent predictors of mortality: Age ≥65 years, Odds Ratio [OR]: 2.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-6.16), 1-point; Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45%, OR: 2.13 (95% CI, 1.14-3.98), 1-point; Moderate-severe calcification, OR: 2.45 (95% CI, 1.18-5.08), 1-point; and Antegrade dissection re-entry, OR: 2.81 (95% CI, 1.06-7.43), 1-point; or Retrograde strategy, OR: 3.51 (95% CI, 1.67-7.37), 1-point; with a bootstrap corrected c-statistics of 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.63-0.81). The calculated risk percentages for mortality based on the PROGRESS-CTO mortality score ranged from 0.05-2.42% for mortality, and 63% of patients in the PROGRESS-CTO cohort had PROGRESS-CTO mortality score of 1 or 2, corresponding to a mortality risk of 0.1-0.5% (Figure 1). Conclusions: The PROGRESS-CTO in-hospital mortality risk score can facilitate risk-benefit assessment and procedural planning in patients undergoing CTO PCI.

Abstract 11342: Contemporary in-hospital Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions: Update from the Progress-cto (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) International Registry

Introduction: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an evolving field. Methods: We examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes of 8,666 CTO PCIs performed at 36 centers between 2012 and 2021. Results: Mean age was 64±10 years and 82% of the patients were men. The prevalence of prior PCI (62%) and diabetes mellitus (43%) was high. Median ejection fraction was 54% (42%, 60%). Radial access was used in 50%. The most common target vessel was the right coronary artery (52%), followed by the left anterior descending artery (26%). The target CTOs were highly complex with mean J-CTO score of 2.4 ±1.3 and PROGRESS score of (1.3 ±1). Technical and procedural success rates were high (86% and 85% respectively) with a relatively low percentage of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (Figure 1). The final successful crossing strategy was antegrade wire escalation in 62%, retrograde in 22%, and antegrade dissection re-entry in 16%. Median contrast volume, air kerma radiation dose and procedure time were 220 (155, 300) ml, 2.2 (1.2, 3.8) Gray and 116 (75, 172) minutes, respectively. Conclusions: High success and acceptable complication rates can currently be achieved in CTO PCI among high-volume, experienced centers.

The association of myocardial injury during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention with lesion complexity and treatment strategy

Abstract Background Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with procedural myocardial injury (PMI), and adverse long-term clinical outcomes [1–4].CTO lesion complexity is quantified using established scores [5–8], with high complexity known to determine the need for dissection and re-entry techniques and the retrograde approach, which are then associated with a higher incidence of procedural complications [9,10]. If CTO recanalization is unsuccessful, a modification procedure can be performed, with the intention to improve subsequent procedural success [11–14]. There are limited data on the association between PMI, CTO complexity and treatment strategy. Purpose To report the incidence of myocardial injury following CTO PCI, and assess whether this is associated with lesion complexity, crossing strategy, or the use of a modification procedure. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive elective CTO PCI procedures performed at a single centre in Norway between January 2020 and March 2021. High-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) was measured pre and 12–18 hours post-procedure. Myocardial injury defined as a post-procedure elevation of hsTnT &amp;gt;5x 99th percentile URL with a normal baseline value or a rise &amp;gt;20% with elevated pre-procedure hsTnT. CTO complexity was described using the J-CTO, PROGRESS, RECHARGE and EuroCASTLE scores [5–8]. Procedures were classified as technical successful or unsuccessful according to CTO academic research consortium (CTO-ARC)criteria [15], and further categorised according to final crossing strategy [antegrade wiring (AW), antegrade dissection re-entry (ADR), retrograde wiring (RW) or retrograde dissection re-entry (RDR)]. If unsuccessful they were further categorised as “failure” or “unplanned modification procedure”. A “planned modification procedure” defined as intentional antegrade modification of the occlusive segment with no attempt to complete CTO crossing. Results We analysed 122 CTO PCI procedures. Mean J-CTO, PROGRESS, RECHARGE, EuroCASTLE scores were 2.7, 1.2, 3.0 and 3.1 respectively. Technical success during the index procedure was 75%. An unplanned or planned modification procedure was performed in 16% and 2% of cases, respectively. Technical failure occurred in 7% of cases. Myocardial injury occurred in 65% of all procedures (78% of failed procedures, 64% of successful procedures, 63% of unplanned and none of 3 planned CTO modification procedures). The mean hs-TnT according to treatment strategy and outcomes are reported in Table 1. The relationship between the CTO complexity scores and hs-TnT are illustrated in Figure 1. Conclusions Myocardial injury is common during CTO PCI, particularly with more complex anatomy, requiring the retrograde approach or an unplanned modification procedure. A prospective analysis of whether myocardial injury can be avoided using a planned investment procedure in high complexity cases is currently being conducted. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

A Clinical Analysis of the Treatment of Chronic Coronary Artery Occlusion With Antegrade Dissection Reentry.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of antegrade dissection re-entry (ADR) technique in the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to open chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions.Methods: The baseline, angiographic results, PCI success rate, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during the 12 months of follow-up were compared between 48 patients who did not use ADR in the treatment of CTO lesions (control group) and 50 patients who used ADR (treatment group).Results: The control group comprised 48 patients who had 52 CTO lesions, and the treatment group comprised 50 patients who had 58 CTO lesions. The success rate of PCI in the treatment group (89.7 vs. 71.2%, P = 0.047) was significantly higher than in the control group, where six patients had in-stent restenosis (ISR, ISR-CTO) that were all recanalized. The mean PCI time (71 ± 25 min vs. 95 ± 33 min, P = 0.041), X-ray exposure time (42 ± 17 min vs. 71 ± 22 min, P = 0.032), contrast agent dosage (98 ± 26 ml vs. 178 ± 63 ml, P = 0.029), MACE incidence during the 12 months of follow-up (22.0 vs. 41.7%, P = 0.046) and recurrent myocardial infarction incidence (10.0 vs. 27.1%, P = 0.047) were significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group. The differences were all statistically significant.Conclusion: It is safe and effective to use the ADR technique in PCI for coronary artery CTO lesions. The technique shortens the operation time, reduces the radiation dose of doctors and patients and the use dose of contrast agents, and improves patients' prognoses.

Algorithm for Recanalization of Chronic Totally Occluded (CTO) Native Coronary Arteries Through a Diseased or Occluded Saphenous Vein Graft in Post Bypass Patients.

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) desobstruction of a native coronary artery in a post coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patient can be a challenging procedure. In principle, the 3 basic approaches of recanalization of occluded native coronary arteries can be used: antegrade wire escalation (AWE), antegrade dissection re-entry (ADR) and a retrograde technique. On the other hand, a previous implanted saphenous vein graft (SVG) – even when occluded – can be used as a conduit for retrograde access. Moreover, access through a graft might be less complex compared to the use of septal or epicardial collaterals. If the graft is still open or has a tapered stump, this should be considered as a suitable conduit. Literature on recanalization of occluded native coronary arteries trough a diseased or occluded SVG is limited. A flowchart with an algorithm in post CABG patients is proposed and illustrated by 3 clinical cases.

Japanese multicenter registry evaluating the antegrade dissection reentry with cardiac computerized tomography for chronic coronary total occlusion

Recently, antegrade dissection re-entry (ADR) with re-entry device for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved to become one of the pillar techniques of the hybrid algorithm. Although the success rate of the device is high, it could be improved. We sought to evaluate the current trends and issues associated with ADR in Japan and evaluate the potential of cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for ADR procedure. A total 48 patients with CTO suitable for ADR evaluated by baseline conventional angiography and CCTA were enrolled. Procedural success and technical success were evaluated as the primary and secondary observations. Furthermore, all puncture points were analyzed by CCTA. CT score at each punctured site depended on the location of plaque deposition (none; + 0, at isolated myocardial site; + 1, at epicardial site; + 2) and the presence of calcification (none; + 0, presence; + 1) was analyzed and calculated (score 0–3). Overall procedure success rate was 95.8%. Thirty-two cases were attempted with the ADR procedure and 25 cases of them were successful. The technical success rate was 78.1% and myocardial infarction or other major complications were not observed in any cases. CT score at 60 puncture sites in 32 cases were analyzed and the score at technical success points was significantly smaller compared to that at technical failure points (0.68 ± 1.09 vs 1.77 ± 1.09, p < 0.0001). CTO-PCI with Stingray device in Japan could achieve a high procedure success and technical success rate. Pre procedure cardiac CT evaluation might support ADR procedure for appropriate patient selection or puncture site selection.

Covered Stents for the Percutaneous Management of Delayed Coronary Wall Rupture Following Subadventitial Rotational Atherectomy

We present herein the case of a delayed covered coronary wall rupture occurring as a rare complication of rotational atherectomy performed in the subintimal space after antegrade dissection reentry for percutaneous recanalization of a long and heavily calcified left anterior descending chronic total occlusion, which was successfully managed percutaneously with the implantation of 2 covered stents. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

Abstract 16435: Contemporary In-Hospital Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions: Update From the PROGRESS-CTO (prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) Multicenter International Registry

Introduction: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been advancing due to improvement of equipment, operator experience, and techniques. Methods: We examined contemporary outcomes of CTO PCI by analyzing the clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics of 7,031 CTO interventions performed in 6,984 patients at 35 participating centers between 2012 and 2020. Results: Mean age was 64.5 ± 10 years and 82% of the patients were men. The patients had high prevalence of comorbidities, such as diabetes (42%), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (29%), prior myocardial infarction (45%), and prior heart failure (29%). The most common CTO target vessel was the right coronary artery (53%), followed by the left anterior descending artery (26%), and left circumflex artery (20%). The mean J-CTO and PROGRESS scores were 2.41 ± 1.28 and 1.09 ± 1.01, respectively. The overall technical and procedural success rates were 85.9% and 83.8% and the rate of in-hospital major cardiac adverse events (MACE) was 2.06%. Technical success and procedural success rates were lower for higher values of J-CTO and PROGRESS scores, and MACE rate was higher ( Figure 1 ). The final successful crossing strategy was antegrade wire escalation in 53.7%, retrograde in 19.9%, and antegrade dissection reentry in 14.6%. The overall median air kerma radiation dose, contrast volume, procedure and fluoroscopy time were 2.30 (1.30, 3.90) Gray, 225 (160, 305) ml, 115 (75, 170) and 43 (26, 70) minutes, respectively. Conclusions: Using a combination of crossing strategies, high success and acceptable complication rates can be achieved in CTO PCI among various centers and patient populations.

Japanese multicenter registry evaluating the antegrade dissection reentry with cardiac computed tomography for chronic coronary total occlusion

Abstract Objective This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of cardiac computed tomography (CT) for antegrade dissection re-entry (ADR) technique in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background Although PCI of CTO is a rapidly evolving field, procedure success rate remains suboptimal. Recently, ADR with Stingray device for CTO-PCI has also evolved to one of the pillar technique of the hybrid algorithm. Although the success rate of the device could be improved, it also remains not always high especially as first crossing strategy. Methods Forty eight patients with total occlusion suitable for revascularization evaluated by baseline coronary angiography and cardiac CT were enrolled in this study from April 2017 to April 2019 from 30 enrolled centers. The primary observation was procedural success. Furthermore, all puncture point with Stingray were analyzed by cardiac CT. In each point, 1) plaques on the isolated myocardial side at distal puncture site (+1 point), 2) any plaques excluded above definition at distal puncture site (+2 points), 3) calcification on both 1 and 2 at distal puncture site (+1 point) were analyzed and calculated the score (Score 0–3) (Figure 1). Results Overall procedure success rate was 95.8% (46/48) and antegrade success rate was 91.3% (42/46). Sixteen cases were succeeded with single guidewire escalation and 32 cases were attempted ADR with Stingray system. Within them, 25 cases were succeeded and 7 cases were observed puncture failure. And 3cases were succeeded with IVUS guide and 2 cases were with retrograde appTechnical success rate with stingray was 78.1% (25/32). Cardiac CT was analyzed 60 puncture sites in 32 cases which were attempted ADR with stingray system (1.88 sites/case). CT score at ADR success point was significantly smaller compare to that at ADR failure point (0.68±1.09 vs 1.77±1.09, p&amp;lt;0.0001). Conclusions Pre procedure Cardiac CT and CT score might be useful for ADR technique in CTO PCI not only for case selection but also for puncture site selection. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Multicenter experience with the antegrade fenestration and reentry technique for chronic total occlusion recanalization.

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antegrade fenestration and reentry (AFR) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) recanalization in a multicenter registry. Adoption of antegrade dissection/reentry (ADR) for CTO recanalization has been limited, and novel ADR techniques are needed. AFR involves the balloon-induced creation of multiple fenestrations between the false and true lumen. A targeted true lumen reentry is subsequently achieved with a low tip-load polymer-jacketed guidewire. Following the initial description and dissemination of AFR, patients undergoing AFR-based CTO recanalization at nine centers were included in the present registry. Study endpoints were AFR success, procedural success, and target-lesion failure (TLF) on follow-up. We included 41 patients. Mean J-CTO score was 2.5 ± 1.4. In 80.5% of cases, AFR was performed after failed antegrade wire escalation. Another ADR technique was used before AFR in one-third of cases. AFR achieved distal true lumen reentry in n = 27/41 (65.9%) cases. In n = 14/41 (34.1%) cases with AFR failure, use of alternative techniques led to successful CTO recanalization in eight additional patients. The overall technical and procedural success rates were 85.4% and 82.9%, respectively. No AFR-related complications were observed. One-year TLF rate was 8.3% overall, with no differences between successful and failed AFR. We report on AFR feasibility in a multicenter registry of patients undergoing CTO recanalization. We observed a moderate success rate, coupled with the absence of complications. Moreover, even a failed AFR attempt did not preclude the use of alternative techniques to achieve recanalization. Further studies should confirm and extend our findings.

Clinical outcomes of opening coronary chronic total occlusion lesions with the assistance of BridgePoint devices

Objective: To investigate the safety, efficacy and prognosis of antegrade dissection re-entry (ADR) with the assistance of BridgePoint devices in opening coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO). Methods: A total of 87 consecutive patients, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using BridgePoint devices from April 2016 to December 2018 in Xijing Hospital, were included in this study. General information of the selected patients, features of CTO lesions and intraoperative parameters were recorded. Short-term outcomes including technical success rate (defined as achieving TIMI 3 blood flow with residual stenosis<30%), surgical success rate (defined as no major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occured while hospitalized), complications, and MACE during hospitalization were observed. MACE included death, recurrent myocardial infarction, target vascular reconstruction (TVR) and cardiac tamponade. Patients were followed up by outpatient or telephone visits at 30 days and 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after discharge. Results: Eighty-seven patients, aged (61±10) years with J-CTO scores (2.49±0.52) were included, and 75(86%) were male. Six patients underwent direct ADR with BridgePoint system, and all were successful. Eighty-one patients underwent rescue ADR using BridgePoint devices, and 62 of them were successful. The success rate of ADR with BridgePoint devices was 78.2% (68/87). Nine out of the 19 failed cases succeeded after the application of rescue antegrade/retrograde technique. The technical success rate was 88.5% (77/87). Coronary perforation occurred in 2 cases (2.3%), one case was treated with covered stent and the other case with tamponade was treated with pericardiocentesis. One patient developed periprocedural myocardial infarction, and one patient suffered from sudden death, and one patient had cardiac tamponade. In-hospital MACE occurred in 3 (3.4%) patients. The surgical success rate was 85.1% (74/87).The procedure time was (175±72)minutes and the amount of contrast used was (449±155)ml. During a follow-up of 17(11, 26) months, the incidence of MACE within 30 days was 4.7% (4/86), while 10.5% (9/86) within 6 months, 17.4% (15/86) within 17 months. Conclusion: Opening CTO with the assistance of BridgePoint devices is feasible and safe, with high success rate and satisfactory outcome.

Advances in CrossBoss/Stingray use in antegrade dissection reentry from the Asia Pacific Chronic Total Occlusion Club.

Antegrade dissection reentry with Stingray device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) accounts for 20–34% of the chronic total occlusion (CTO) cases in the various hybrid operators' CTO registries and is an important component of CTO crossing algorithms. The Stingray device can facilitate antegrade dissection and reentry, however its use is low outside North America and Europe. The Asia Pacific CTO Club along with three experience Stingray operators from the US, Europe and India, created an algorithm guiding use of the CrossBoss and Stingray catheter. This APCTO Stingray algorithm defines when to use the CrossBoss and Stingray device recommending a reduction in CrossBoss use except for in‐stent restenosis lesions and immediate transition from knuckle wiring to the Stingray device. When antegrade wiring fails, choice of Stingray‐facilitated reentry versus parallel wiring depends on operator experience, device availability, cost concerns, and anatomical factors. When the antegrade wire enters the subintimal space, we recommend using a rotational microcatheter to produce a channel and deliver the Stingray balloon—so called the “bougie technique.” We recommend early switch to Stingray rather than persisting with single wire redirection or parallel wire. We recommend choosing a suitable reentry zone based on preprocedural computer tomography or angiogram, routine use of stick and swap, routine use of Subintimal TRAnscatheter Withdrawal (STRAW) through the Stingray balloon, and the multi stick and swap technique. We believe these techniques and algorithm can facilitate incorporation of the Stingray balloon into the practice of CTO interventionists globally.