Antagonists In Patients Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of novel anticoagulant therapies in patients with chronic kidney disease-asystematic review and meta-analysis.

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases, including atrial fibrillation, which usually requires anticoagulant therapy. The effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with CKD remain insufficiently studied, particularly in the more advanced stages. This systematic review, registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023410192), adhered to PRISMA guidelines and included randomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in CKD patients. Major databases were searched, and studies were selected based on strict inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models. Twenty-three studies with a total of 465,673 CKD patients were included. Direct oral anticoagulants showed a significant reduction in major bleeding events compared to vitamin K antagonists (Relative Risk [RR] = 0.62, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.49-0.79, p < 0.01) and a non-significant trend toward reducing thromboembolic events (RR = 0.69, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.43-1.14, p = 0.11). Furthermore, direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR = 0.63, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.43-0.91, p = 0.02). Direct oral anticoagulants may offer a safe alternative to vitamin K antagonists in CKD patients, particularly in terms of reducing bleeding risks and potentially improving survival. However, their role in preventing thromboembolic events remains uncertain, highlighting the need for further research, especially in patients with advanced CKD and kidneyfailure.

Discontinuation and reinitiation of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) improve outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but are underused. Point prevalent use has been described, but the kinetics of discontinuation and the extent of reinitiation have not been studied. Patients with HFrEF enrolled in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry between 2006 and 2021 were linked to the Prescribed Drug Register. The rate of discontinuation during the first year of treatment and reinitiation the year after discontinuation were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the predictors of discontinuation. Of 11 474 MRA new users, 71% remained on therapy at 1 year. Baseline characteristics independently associated with discontinuation were: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-2.27), hyperkalaemia (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.25-2.40), eGFR 30-60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.37-1.66), age ≥80 years (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.43), enrolment as inpatient (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.14-1.38), a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10-1.39), living alone (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.13-1.34), ischaemic heart disease (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.31), anaemia (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.29), diabetes mellitus (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.27) and New York Heart Association class III-IV (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.24). Reinitiation within a year occurred in 46% of cases, mostly within 3 months after discontinuation. Among patients with HFrEF initiated on MRA, 71% remained on therapy at 1 year. Discontinuation occurred early and was more common in patients with advanced kidney disease, hyperkalaemia, lack of follow-up in specialty care, more severe heart failure, comorbidities, and markers of sociodemographic frailty. Among those who discontinued, almost half reinitiated treatment the year following discontinuation.

Antihypertensive effects and changes in extracellular water content by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with primary aldosteronism.

In primary aldosteronism (PA), non-suppressible excessive aldosterone secretion due to dietary salt intake significantly contributes to hypertension and cardiovascular complications. Blocking the overactivation of mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs) with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) is a cornerstone for the medical treatment of PA. However, the role of MRAs in controlling hypertension remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the relationship between changes in body composition parameters (determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis), blood pressure (BP) levels, serum potassium (K+) levels and Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores after MRA treatment in 50 patients with PA. Treatment with MRAs significantly decreased the systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) levels and extracellular water (ECW) volume, while it increased the serum K+ levels, active renin concentrations (ARCs), and scores on several SF-36-based quality of life (QOL) subscales. ECW change (ΔECW) and serum K+ change were not significantly associated with changes in SBP and DBP levels. ΔECW showed a significant inverse correlation with ΔARC, suggesting that ARC increases with decreasing ECW volume due to renal MR activity blockade and that ARC is a highly sensitive indicator of ECW volume. In the stratified analysis of patients with PA, ECW volume was significantly decreased in those aged ≥60 years and those with a body mass index of ≥25 kg/m2. In conclusion, MRA treatment showed antihypertensive, biochemical, and QOL improvement effects in patients with PA. The antihypertensive effect may not be related to the decrease in ECW volume due to renal MR activity blockade. Evaluation of ECW using BIA in patients with PA treated with MRAs. Abbreviations: ARC, active renin concentration; BIA, bioelectrical impedance analysis; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; ECW, extracellular water; K+, serum potassium; MRA, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; PA, primary aldosteronism; QOL; quality of life; Δ, parameter changes after MRA treatment.

Abstract 4138662: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist in patients with acute myocardial infarction: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Background: While mineralocorticoid antagonists (MRA) reduce mortality in patients developing heart failure post myocardial infarction (MI), it is unclear whether they are beneficial in an unselected post-MI population. Aims: Using a systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to determine the effect of MRA treatment versus no MRA treatment on all-cause mortality in unselected post-MI patients from randomized data, simultaneously with the presentation of the largest randomized controlled trial on the topic, the CLEAR SYNERGY trial. Methods/Approach: We completed a systematic review of all randomized controlled trials comparing MRA treatment to no MRA treatment in post-MI patients. We will perform our primary analysis using fixed effects with the Peto odds ratio method and use random effects as a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes will include cardiovascular mortality, new or worsening heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction and stroke. Results/Data: Our systematic review of Pubmed, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception until April 30, 2024, yielded 456 records. A total of 11,199 participants from 11 randomized clinical trials will be included in addition to the late-breaking CLEAR SYNERGY trial. The CLEAR SYNERGY trial is a 2 x 2 factorial randomized controlled trial of low-dose colchicine 0.5mg daily versus placebo and spironolactone 25mg daily versus placebo in 7,062 post-MI patients who were within 72h of the index percutaneous coronary intervention. The results of the spironolactone factorial will be presented in the fall of 2024 with an expected median follow-up of 3.5 years. As the investigators of the CLEAR SYNERGY trial, we will combine our data with the other 11 trials for a total of 12 trials and 18,261 participants. Conclusions: CLEAR SYNERGY is the largest randomized controlled trial with the longest follow-up of spironolactone in the post-MI population. Our meta-analysis will provide updated effect estimates of post-MI MRA treatment, leveraging the late-breaking CLEAR SYNERGY data to reflect the totality of the evidence.

Neuropeptide Y Y2 receptors in acute and chronic pain and itch

Pain and itch are regulated by a diverse array of neuropeptides and their receptors in superficial laminae of the spinal cord dorsal horn (DH). Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is normally expressed on DH neurons but not sensory neurons. By contrast, the Npy2r receptor (Y2) is expressed on the central and peripheral terminals of sensory neurons but not on DH neurons. Neurophysiological slice recordings indicate that Y2-selective agonists inhibits spinal neurotransmitter release from sensory neurons. However, behavioral pharmacology studies indicate that Y2 agonists exert minimal changes in nociception, even after injury. Additional discrepancies in the behavioral actions of the Y2-antagonist BIIE0246 – reports of either pronociception or antinociception – have now been resolved. In the normal state, spinally-directed (intrathecal) administration of BIIE0246 elicits ongoing nociception, hypersensitivity to sensory stimulation, and aversion. Conversely, in the setting of nerve injury and inflammation, intrathecal BIIE024 reduced not only mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity, but also a measure of the affective dimension of pain (conditioned place preference). When administered in chronic pain models of latent sensitization, BIIE0246 produced a profound reinstatement of pain-like behaviors. We propose that tissue or nerve injury induces a G protein switch in the action of NPY-Y2 signaling from antinociception in the naïve state to the inhibition of mechanical and heat hyperalgesia in the injured state, and then a switch back to antinociception to keep LS in a state of remission. This model clarifies the pharmacotherapeutic potential of Y2 research, pointing to the development of a new non-opioid pharmacotherapy for chronic pain using Y2 antagonists in patients who do not develop LS.

CRF1 and ACTH antagonists in patients with classic 21-hydroxylase deficiency

CRF1 and ACTH antagonists in patients with classic 21-hydroxylase deficiency

Efficacy and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Compared with Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Type 2 Valvular Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and type 2 valvular heart disease (VHD). We searched the PubMed, LILACS, and MEDLINE databases to retrieve, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NOACs and VKAs in patients with AF and type 2 VHD, excluding mitral stenosis (moderate to severe, of rheumatic origin) or mechanical heart valves. The efficacy outcomes assessed were stroke and systemic embolism (SE), while safety outcomes included major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Seven RCTs, including 16,070 patients with AF and type 2 VHD, were included. NOACs reduced the risk of stroke/SE (relative risk [RR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.89; P = 0.0005), with no significant difference in major bleeding (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.64-1.21; P = 0.43). The risk of ICH was reduced with NOACs (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27-0.77; P = 0.003). For patients with AF and bioprosthetic heart valve (five trials, 2805 patients), stroke/SE risks (RR, 0.65, 95% CI, 0.44-0.96) with NOACs were superior to VKAs. Major bleeding risks without ENVISAGE TAVI AF trial (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30-0.94; P = 0.03) with NOACs were superior to VKAs. The risks of ICH (RR, 0.61; 95% CI 0.34-1.09; P = 0.09) with NOACs were comparable to VKAs. NOACs demonstrate efficacy and safety in patients with AF and type 2 VHD and reduce the risk of stroke/SE and ICH when compared with those with VKAs.

Efficacy analysis of letrozole combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in patients with high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome undergoing total embryo freezing

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of letrozole combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists (GnRH-ant) in patients at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) who underwent total embryo freezing after oocyte retrieval. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 348 female patients who underwent in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) at the Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January and July 2023. Due to their high risk of OHSS, these patients canceled fresh embryo transfer and opted for total embryo freezing. Based on patients' preferences, those who received GnRH-ant and letrozole after oocyte retrieval were categorized as the intervention group (164 cases), while those who did not receive these medications were categorized as the control group (184 cases). The first luteal phase after oocyte retrieval, OHSS grading, ovarian volume, and estradiol (E2) levels were evaluated in both groups. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze factors related to moderate-to-severe OHSS among patients at high risk of OHSS who underwent total embryo freezing after oocyte retrieval. Results: The age of the intervention and control groups was (29.3±3.8) and (29.4±4.1) years, respectively (P=0.821). The duration of the first luteal phase post-oocyte retrieval was shorter in the intervention group [(7.16±1.39) days] compared to that in the control group [(13.88±2.11) days] (P<0.001). The incidences of mild, moderate, and severe OHSS in the intervention group were 75.0% (123 cases), 23.8% (39 cases), and 1.2% (2 cases), respectively, whereas in the control group they were 12.5% (23 cases), 60.9% (112 cases), and 26.6% (49 cases) (P<0.001). E2 levels on the 2nd and 6th days after oocyte retrieval [M(Q1,Q3)] in the intervention group were 1 520.0 (1 213.8, 1 884.8) and 108.5 (45.6, 218.0) ng/L, respectively, which were statistically significantly lower than those in the control group [1 666.0 (508.8, 1 702.0) ng/L] and [1 761.0 (826.0, 2 546.5) ng/L] (P<0.001). The abdominal cavity effusion in the intervention group [M(Q1,Q3)] were 19.5 (0, 30) and 0 mm, statistically significantly less than those in the control group [46.0 (0, 61.0) mm] and [54.5 (0, 69.5) mm] (P<0.001). On the 6th day after oocyte retrieval, the bilateral ovarian volumes in the intervention group were smaller than those in the control group (P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that no combined treatment with letrozole and GnRH-ant was a risk factor of moderate to severe OHSS. The risk of developing moderate to severe OHSS in the control group was 35.312 times higher than that in the intervention group (OR=35.312, 95%CI: 17.488-71.300). Conclusions: The administration of letrozole combined with GnRH-ant post-oocyte retrieval in patients at high risk of OHSS can prevent the occurrence of moderate-to-severe OHSS, shorten the first luteal phase, accelerate the reduction of serum E2 levels, and promote the recovery of ovarian volume and absorption of abdominal fluid.

Apixaban Use in Patients with Kidney Impairment: A Review of Pharmacokinetic, Interventional, and Observational Study Data.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a significant global health issue and is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Patients with CKD have an increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become a standard of care for anticoagulation (AC) in patients with AF and VTE, the appropriate use of these agents in comorbid kidney impairment warrants detailed discussion. This scientific narrative review summarizes the effectiveness and safety of apixaban use in patients with renal dysfunction by assessing the current published pharmacokinetic, interventional, observational, and guideline data. Apixaban is a highly selective, orally active, direct inhibitor of factor Xa, with well-established pharmacokinetics and consistent clinical outcomes across a broad range of patient populations, including those with kidney impairment. Overall, the scientific literature has shown that apixaban has a favorable clinical efficacy and safety profile compared with vitamin K antagonists for patients with AF or VTE and comorbid kidney impairment. These data support the approved label dosing strategy of apixaban in reducing the risk of stroke/systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF and in treating VTE across all ranges of kidney function. Both clinician experience and knowledge of patient-specific factors may be required in the management of comorbid patients with advanced CKD or those requiring dialysis, as data on these patients are limited.

Apixaban Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Cohort Study.

Current guidelines recommend that direct anticoagulants should not be used in prevention of recurrent thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, except for triple-positive APS and rivaroxaban use, little evidence supports such recommendation. In a real-life cohort study, we evaluated the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding in patients with APS on apixaban versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA). We enrolled 152 patients with APS (aged 44 years [interquartile range 36-56], 83% women), including 66 patients treated with apixaban 5 mg bid and 86 with warfarin (target international normalized ratio [INR] 2-3). During a median follow-up of 53 months, we recorded venous thromboembolism, ischemic stroke, or myocardial infarction, along with major bleeding. We observed 4 thrombotic events (6.1%, 3 venous thromboembolism and 1 ischemic stroke) in patients on apixaban and 12 events (14%, 9 venous thromboembolism, 2 ischemic strokes and 1 myocardial infarction) in VKA patients. Patients with APS on apixaban had similar risk of recurrent thromboembolism compared with those on warfarin (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.327, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.104-1.035). Thromboembolic events occurred less commonly in statin users (8% vs. 50%, P = 0.01) and more frequently in triple-positive APS (50% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.028) and in patients with higher D-dimer at baseline ( P = 0.023); the latter difference was present in the apixaban group ( P = 0.02). Patients on apixaban had similar risk of major bleeding compared with warfarin (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.201-1.448). In real-life patients with APS, apixaban appears to be similar to VKA for the prevention of thromboembolism and risk of bleeding, which might suggest that some patients with APS could be treated with apixaban.

ADPORT-601: First-in-human study of adenosine 2A (A2A) and adenosine 2B (A2B) receptor antagonists in patients with select advanced solid tumors.

e14681 Background: Hypoxic tumors possess high levels of extracellular adenosine within the tumor microenvironment (TME) which suppresses both innate and adaptive immune responses by binding the adenosine receptors A2AR and A2BR. TT-10 (PORT-6) and TT-4 (PORT-7) are potent and selective antagonists of A2AR and A2BR, respectively. Both agents have shown monotherapy activity in both non-immunogenic (4T-1) and immunogenic (CT-26) tumor mouse models. Optimizing inhibition of A2AR and A2BR separately and in combination provides an opportunity to dissect the role of each signaling pathway within the TME. Methods: ADPORT-601 is a multi-center, open-label Phase 1 study, evaluating the safety, efficacy, PK and pharmacodynamics of PORT-6 in participants with mCRPC, RCC, or other selected solid tumors which are refractory to standard therapy. A subsequent arm will similarly test PORT-7 in participants with selected solid tumors. The Phase 1a cohorts utilize a standard 3+3 design. Phase 1b will be initiated once recommended doses have been established and will consist of monotherapy expansion cohorts for each drug, as well as both drugs combined at the optimal doses, and with other immunotherapy agents. A novel IHC-based assay will be implemented to select for patients with high A2AR expression. Metabolomic and gene expression profiling were performed on previously acquired bone biopsy and blood samples, respectively, to characterize the role of adenosine in CRPC. Results: 10 patients with mCRPC (n=6), RCC (n=3) or NSCLC (n=1) have been enrolled at escalating doses. Treatment-related AEs have been G1-2, with fatigue (29%), nausea (29%) and vomiting (14%) being the most reported. No related SAEs or dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) have been observed. Higher adenosine precursor metabolite (e.g., AMP, ADP, ATP, ADPR, inosine) levels were observed in image-guide bone metastatic lesions relative to non-tumor bearing bone controls (P&lt;0.05; n=10/group). A2AR and A2BR mRNA levels were enriched (1.3 and 1.4 log2 fold change, p&lt;0.05, respectively) in the plasma of mCRPC patients compared to those with localized disease. Updated safety, efficacy, PK and adenosine expression data will be reported at the meeting. Conclusions: PORT-6 is well tolerated to date. The TME within mCRPC bone metastases provides a unique target for A2AR and A2BR antagonism. Longitudinal blood and tissue samples, including bone biopsies, are being collected to enable biomarker analyses, allowing for elucidation of the relative contribution of A2AR and A2BR in suppressing anti-tumor immunity. Multi-omic translational analyses of tissue are planned to determine whether potent adenosine receptor antagonism will have an anti-tumor effect and convert the TME from immunosuppressive to proinflammatory. Clinical trial information: NCT04969315 .

Prediction of endogenous mineralocorticoid receptor activity by depressor effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with primary aldosteronism

Prediction of endogenous mineralocorticoid receptor activity by depressor effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with primary aldosteronism

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Rivaroxaban Versus Vitamin K Antagonist in Patients with Lower Limbs Deep Vein Thrombosis

OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness of rivaroxaban and vitamin K antagonists in patients with lower limbs deep vein thrombosis. METHODOLOGY This quasi-experimental study was conducted in the Department of General Medicine in Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar for six months with a sample size of sixty. Thirty patients were given Rivaroxaban (Group A) and the other thirty patients were given Vitamin K antagonist (Group B). In the Rivaroxaban group, patients had received 15mg twice daily for the first 3 weeks, 20 mg once daily from 3 weeks to 3 months, and followed by 10 mg once daily. In the Vitamin K antagonist group, patients had received a dose of warfarin of 2.5-5mg once daily, with a goal INR between 2-3. Patients were followed up for 3 months, every month and the effectiveness of both drugs was recorded. RESULTSOur study shows that in group A (Rivaroxaban), the mean age was 34 years with SD ± 10.77 and in group B (Vitamin K antagonist), the mean age was 36 years with SD ± 11.09. In Group A, 12(40%) patients were males and 18(60%) were females. In Group B, 11(37%) patients were males and 19(63%) were females. Moreover, group A was effective in 27(90%) patients while group B was effective in 25(83%). CONCLUSION Rivaroxaban is more effective than vitamin K antagonist in the treatment of lower limbs deep vein thrombosis.

Prediction of endogenous mineralocorticoid receptor activity by depressor effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with primary aldosteronism.

Patients with primary aldosteronism have an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease. The response to mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists varies among individuals, indicating diverse mineralocorticoid receptor activities in these patients. This study explored the factors linked to the efficacy of blood pressure reduction through mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with primary aldosteronism. We examined the relationship between the reduction in blood pressure and patient characteristics in a group of 41 patients with primary aldosteronism (24 males, mean age 55 ± 13 years, including 34 patients diagnosed with bilateral primary aldosteronism) before and after undergoing treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Significant reductions in office blood pressure were observed 3 and 6 months after treatment initiation. Single correlation analyses showed that the urinary chloride-to-potassium ratio displayed the strongest positive association with blood pressure reduction, surpassing plasma aldosterone concentration, plasma renin activity, and urinary sodium-to-potassium ratio, at 3 and 6 months. Multiple correlation analyses revealed a consistent and independent positive correlation between the urinary chloride-to-potassium ratio and blood pressure reduction at 3 and 6 months. The optimal threshold for the urinary chloride-to-potassium ratio with respect to its ability to lower blood pressure, was determined as 3.18. These results imply that the urinary chloride-to-potassium ratio may be independently associated with the effectiveness of blood pressure reduction facilitated by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Moreover, it could potentially serve as a valuable predictor of the effectiveness of these agents and function as an indicator of endogenous mineralocorticoid receptor activity in patients with primary aldosteronism.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients on chronic dialysis.

Clinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are scarce and inconclusive in patients who are receiving dialysis, for whom DOAC are not labelled in Europe. In a French nationwide registry study of patients on chronic dialysis, we compared the effectiveness and safety of off-label DOAC use vs approved vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Data on patients on dialysis were extracted from the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry and merged with data from the French national healthcare system database (Système National des Données de Santé, SNDS). Patients on dialysis who had initiated treatment with an oral anticoagulant between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2020, were eligible for inclusion. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of major bleeding events and the primary effectiveness outcome was the occurrence of thrombotic events. Using propensity score-weighted cause-specific Cox regression, we compared the safety and effectiveness outcomes for DOAC and VKA. A total of 8954 patients received an oral anticoagulant (483 DOAC and 8471 VKA) for the first time after the initiation of dialysis. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up period of 1.7 (0.8-3.2) years, 2567 patients presented a first thromboembolic event and 1254 patients had a bleeding event. After propensity score adjustment, the risk of a thromboembolic event was significantly lower in patients treated with a DOAC than in patients treated with a VKA {weighted hazard ratio (wHR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.66 (0.46; 0.94)}. A non-significant trend toward a lower risk of major bleeding events was found in DOAC-treated patients, relative to VKA-treated patients [wHR (95% CI) 0.68 (0.41; 1.12)]. The results were consistent across subgroups and in sensitivity analyses. In a large group of dialysis patients initiating an oral anticoagulant, the off-label use of DOACs was associated with a significantly lower risk of thromboembolic events and a non-significantly lower risk of bleeding, relative to VKA use. This provides reassurance regarding the off-label use of DOACs in people on dialysis.

Decurarization After Thoracic Anesthesia using sugammadex compared to neostigmine (DATA trial): a multicenter randomized double-blinded controlled trial

BackgroundThoracic surgery is a high-risk surgery especially for the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Postoperative residual paralysis has been shown to be a risk factor for pulmonary complications. Nevertheless, there are few data in the literature concerning the use of neuromuscular blocking agent antagonists in patients undergoing lung surgery.MethodsSeventy patients were randomized in three Italian centers to receive sugammadex or neostigmine at the end of thoracic surgery according to the depth of the residual neuromuscular block. The primary outcome was the time from reversal administration to a train-of-four ratio (TOFR) of 0.9. Secondary outcomes were the time to TOFR of 1.0, to extubation, to postanesthesia unit (PACU) discharge, postoperative complications until 30 days after surgery, and length of hospital stay.ResultsMedian time to recovery to a TOFR of 0.9 was significantly shorter in the sugammadex group compared to the neostigmine one (88 vs. 278 s — P < 0.001). The percentage of patients who recovered to a TOFR of 0.9 within 5 min from reversal administration was 94.4% and 58.8% in the sugammadex and neostigmine groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The time to extubation, but not the PACU stay time, was significantly shorter in the sugammadex group. No differences were found between the study groups as regards postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. The superiority of sugammadex in shortening the recovery time was confirmed for both deep/moderate and shallow/minimal neuromuscular block.ConclusionsAmong patients undergoing thoracic surgery, sugammadex ensures a faster recovery from the neuromuscular block and earlier extubation compared to neostigmine.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation and stage 5 chronic kidney disease under dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and normal or slightly impaired renal function, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is preferable to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). However, in patients undergoing hemodialysis, the efficacy, and safety of DOACs compared with VKAs are still unknown. To review current evidence about the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to VKAs, in patients with AF and chronic kidney disease under hemodialysis. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for RCTs comparing DOACs with VKAs for anticoagulation in patients with AF on dialysis therapy. Outcomes of interest were: (1) stroke; (2) major bleeding; (3) cardiovascular mortality; and (4) all-cause mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1.7 and heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistics. Three randomized controlled trials were included, comprising a total of 383 patients. Of these, 218 received DOACs (130 received apixaban; 88 received rivaroxaban), and 165 were treated with VKAs (116 received warfarin; 49 received phenprocoumon). The incidence of stroke was significantly lower in patients treated with DOACs (4.7%) compared with those using VKAs (9.5%) (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18-0.97; p = 0.04; I2 = 0%). However, the difference was not statistically significant in the case of ischemic stroke specifically (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.17-1.04; p = 0.06; I2 = 0%). As for the major bleeding outcome, the DOAC group (11%) had fewer events than the VKA group (13.9%) but without statistical significance (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.45-1.28; p = 0.29; I2 = 0%). There was no significant difference between groups regarding cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.23; 95% CI 0.66-2.29; p = 0.52; I2 = 13%) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.77-1.24; p = 0.84; I2 = 16%). This meta-analysis suggests that in patients with AF on dialysis, the use of DOACs was associated with a significant reduction in stroke, and a numerical trend of less incidence of major bleeding compared with VKAs, but in this case with no statistical significance. Results may be limited by a small sample size or insufficient statistical power.

Rivaroxaban vs Vitamin K Antagonist in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease

BackgroundTreatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) has been linked to worsening of kidney function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). ObjectivesXARENO (Factor XA-inhibition in RENal patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation Observational registry; NCT02663076) is a prospective observational study comparing adverse kidney outcomes in patients with AF and advanced chronic kidney disease receiving rivaroxaban or VKA. MethodsPatients with AF and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 15 to 49 mL/min/1.73 m2 were included. Blinded adjudicated outcome analysis evaluated adverse kidney outcomes (a composite of eGFR decline to <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, need for chronic kidney replacement therapy, or development of acute kidney injury). A composite net clinical benefit outcome (stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, or cardiovascular death) was also analyzed. HRs with 95% CIs were calculated using propensity score overlap weighting Cox regression. ResultsThere were 1,455 patients (764 rivaroxaban; 691 VKA; mean age 78 years; 44% females). The mean eGFR was 37.1 ± 9.0 in those receiving rivaroxaban and 36.4 ± 10.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 in those receiving VKA. After a median follow-up of 2.1 years, rivaroxaban was associated with less adverse kidney outcomes (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.43-0.88) and all-cause death (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.98). No significant differences were observed in net clinical benefit. ConclusionsIn patients with AF and advanced chronic kidney disease, those receiving rivaroxaban had less adverse kidney events and lower all-cause mortality compared to those receiving VKA, supporting the use of rivaroxaban in this high-risk group of patients.

Assessment of Oral Anticoagulation with Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients Living in a Low-Income Country of West Africa

Assessment of Oral Anticoagulation with Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients Living in a Low-Income Country of West Africa

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation on chronic hemodialysis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease on chronic hemodialysis are at risk for thromboembolic and bleeding events. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this population. We systematically searched PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with VKAs in patients with AF on chronic hemodialysis from inception to February 2023 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Outcomes were reported using risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.2.2. We selected three RCTs including 341 patients, of whom 176 (51.6%) were randomized to DOACs. Follow-up ranged from 174days to 3.38years. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.34; 95% CI 0.69-2.60; p = 0.39), all-cause mortality (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.72-1.27; p = 0.77), ischemic/uncertain type of stroke or transient ischemic attack (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.19-1.35; p = 0.17), or major or life-threatening bleeding (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.39-1.25; p = 0.22). In this meta-analysis of three RCTs, no significant difference was observed between DOACs and VKAs in cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, ischemic/uncertain type of stroke or transient ischemic attack, or major or life-threatening bleeding in patients with AF on chronic hemodialysis.