Anorectal Dysfunction In Patients Research Articles

Low anterior resection syndrome and methods of its assessment (literature review)

Low anterior resection syndrome is a common problem due to the increased incidence of rectal cancer and the high incidence of anorectal dysfunction during sphincter-preserving surgical interventions. The influence of functional disorders on the quality of life of patients and changes in social adaptation makes it possible to attribute the syndrome of low anterior resection to topical and discussed issues.Purpose of the study: to consider the features of the development of anorectal dysfunction in patients with rectal cancer by studying risk factors and pathogenetic aspects of the development of low anterior resection syndrome, as well as to evaluate the role of objective studies in assessing the syndrome according to published literature. The etiology of low anterior resection syndrome is multifactorial. Unmodified and modified predictors are distinguished among the risk factors. Unmodified factors include female gender and age over 65 years. Among the modifiable predictors, radiation therapy, surgical intervention, the type of formed colorectal anastomosis and the development of its insolvency, as well as the elimination of intestinal stoma have a negative effect on anorectal function. Nevertheless, the greatest role in its development is played by organ-preserving surgery with total mesorecumectomy, radiation therapy and the formation of a preventive ileostomy. The complexity of the pathophysiological mechanism of the syndrome necessitates a detailed study of anorectal function and changes in its parameters in patients during treatment for rectal cancer. Functional disorders in low anterior resection syndrome vary in severity. In the study of the severity of clinical manifestations of the syndrome, the use of the LARS scale is important, and in the development of anal incontinence, the use of the Wexner scale is important. However, the most accurate assessment can be carried out by objective research methods, such as high-resolution anorectal manometry. This research method allows to control the function of the rectal obturator apparatus at different stages of combined treatment and unwraps the possibility of searching for new predictors of low anterior resection syndrome.

Anorectal dysfunction in patients with mid-low rectal cancer after surgery: A pilot study with three-dimensional high-resolution manometry.

BACKGROUNDThe quality of life in patients who develop low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after surgery for mid-low rectal cancer is seriously impaired. The underlying pathophysiological mechanism of LARS has not been fully investigated.AIMTo assess anorectal function of mid-low rectal cancer patients developing LARS perioperatively.METHODSPatients diagnosed with mid-low rectal cancer were included. The LARS score was used to evaluate defecation symptoms 3 and 6 mo after anterior resection or a stoma reversal procedure. Anorectal functions were assessed by three-dimensional high resolution anorectal manometry preoperatively and 3-6 mo after surgery.RESULTSThe study population consisted of 24 patients. The total LARS score was decreased at 6 mo compared with 3 mo after surgery (P < 0.05), but 58.3% (14/24) lasted as major LARS at 6 mo after surgery. The length of the high-pressure zone of the anal sphincter was significantly shorter, the mean resting pressure and maximal squeeze pressure of the anus were significantly lower than those before surgery in all patients (P < 0.05), especially in the neoadjuvant therapy group after surgery (n = 18). The focal pressure defects of the anal canal were detected in 70.8% of patients, and those patients had higher LARS scores at 3 mo postoperatively than those without focal pressure defects (P < 0.05). Spastic peristaltic contractions from the new rectum to anus were detected in 45.8% of patients, which were associated with a higher LARS score at 3 mo postoperatively (P < 0.05).CONCLUSIONThe LARS score decreases over time after surgery in the majority of patients with mid-low rectal cancer. Anorectal dysfunctions, especially focal pressure defects of the anal canal and spastic peristaltic contractions from the new rectum to anus postoperatively, might be the major pathophysiological mechanisms of LARS.

Ulcerative Colitis: Are We Neglecting Its Progressive Character

Introduction: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disease but its progressive character, with structural damage, is insufficiently studied. Objectives: To analyze a group of patients without referral bias, regarding its clinical course, the morphological damage, and functional status. Methods: We evaluated UC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2004, living in the direct referral area of the hospital and determined the medication use, colectomy rate, structural damage (“lead pipe,” stenosis, pseudopolyps, fibrous bridges), and anorectal function (prospective evaluation with the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score [CCIS] and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale). Results: We identified 104 patients, 47% female, with a mean age at diagnosis of 38 ± 17 years, 24% with proctitis, 57% with left colitis, and 19% with pancolitis. In 3 patients, it was not possible to obtain follow-up data. Of the studied patients, 56% needed corticosteroid therapy, 38% immunosuppressants, and 16% anti-tumor necrosis factors (anti-TNFs). After a mean follow-up of 13 ± 2 years, we found structural damage in 25 patients (24%): 5% with proctocolectomy, 15% with “lead pipe,” 16% with pseudopolyps, and 3% with stenosis and fibrous bridges. Reference to functional anorectal disorders was identified in 49%, mostly previous and self-limited episodes of incontinence, but including persistent incontinence in 10% (CCIS 8 ± 4.8). There was an increased incidence of structural damage and anorectal dysfunction in patients who needed corticosteroid therapy (p = 0.001), immunosuppressants (p < 0.001), and anti-TNFs (p = 0.002) and an association of structural damage with anorectal dysfunction (p < 0.001). There was no association between age and anorectal dysfunction, including incontinence episodes. Conclusions: UC is a disease with structural and functional consequences in a significant subset of patients. This should be incorporated when defining the therapeutic strategy.

Protocolo de estudios neurofisiológicos del suelo pélvico para la valoración de la disfunción anorrectal en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently develop anorectal dysfunction. The neuromuscular structures of the pelvic floor and the mechanisms of voluntary control over defecation can be compromised by the patchy lesions of MS or secondary to the patient's disability. The involvement of multiple factors limits understanding of the pathophysiology of anorectal dysfunction in MS. Specific neurophysiological tests assess the functionality of the elements of the central and peripheral nervous system involved in anorectal dysfunction. To propose a diagnostic protocol of standardised neurophysiological studies of the pelvic floor in order to characterise the pathophysiology of anorectal dysfunction in patients with MS. The following studies were conducted on 16 patients with defined MS and who met criteria for constipation or faecal incontinence: external anal sphincter electromyography (EAS-EMG), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) of the internal pudendal nerve, recording of ano-sacral reflexes and pudendal nerve neurography. The clinical and neurophysiological characteristics were heterogeneous. Nine patients presented constipation; two had isolated faecal incontinence; and five, a combination of both. Abolition or delay in the latency of the SSEP was the most frequent finding (n = 12), followed by the detection of paradoxical contraction (n = 11) and deficient recruitment (n = 8) in the EAS-EMG. The correct interpretation of each available neurophysiological test and the correlation of the findings as a whole enable us to understand the pathophysiology of anorectal dysfunction. The implementation of a protocol for neuro-physiological studies of the pelvic floor makes it possible to adjust the diagnosis by identifying the central or peripheral nervous lesion determining anorectal dysfunction in patients with MS.

Anorectal dysfunction in patients with ulcerative colitis: impaired adaptation or enhanced perception?

Rectal disorders during ulcerative colitis (UC) drastically alter the quality of life and may result from an impairment of rectal perception and compliance. This study aims to assess anorectal disorders in patients with mild-to-moderate UC. Anal pressures and the rectal responses to phasic rectal isobaric distension in 10 patients with mild-to-moderate UC were prospectively compared with those in 10 healthy volunteers (HVs). The patients in each group were similar regarding age, gender, and delivery. In the resting state, the anal canal pressures were similar between the groups. Only the squeeze pressures of the lower anal canal were significantly lower in UC patients than in HVs. During phasic isobaric distension, rectal sensitivity was similar between the groups, whatever the step of distension. Isobaric rectal distension resulted in a significant decrease of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex and a decrease in rectal tone and a significant drop in rectal compliance in UC patients compared with HVs. Patients showing mild-to-moderate UC experience rectal compliance and innervation disorders without a significant change in rectal sensitivity. The findings of this work suggest impairment not only of the properties of the rectal wall but also of intrinsic innervation. Repeated evaluation over time may be helpful for analyzing the reversibility of the process after healing.

Sa1354 Comparison Between Defecography and Echodefecography in the Assessment of Anorectal Dysfunction in Patients With Obstructed Defecation

patients with defecatory disturbances symptoms. Male:female 9/80, the mean age of patients was 57 years old (range 25-78). The assessment of the degree of agreement or concordance between dynamic ultrasound and anorectal manometry yielded a kappa index of 0.87 (very good agreement) with statistically significant results (p=0.05). Conclusion: Ultrasonography may be used to assess patients with obstructed defecation, as it is able to detect the same anorrectal dysfuntions found by another pelvic floor studies. It is a minimally invasive, well tolerated method, and avoids exposure to radiation. Although both methods shows very good agreement with each other they can't replace them since both methods have false positive results.

Assessment of rectocolonic morphology and function in patients with Chagas disease in Barcelona (Spain).

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between colonic symptoms, radiological abnormalities, and anorectal dysfunction in patients with Chagas disease. We performed a cross-sectional study of untreated patients diagnosed with Chagas disease. All patients were evaluated clinically (by a questionnaire for colonic symptoms based on Rome III criteria) and underwent a barium enema and anorectal manometry. A control group of patients with functional constipation and without Chagas disease was included in the study. Overall, 69 patients were included in the study: 42 patients were asymptomatic and 27 patients had abdominal symptoms according to Rome III criteria. Anorectal manometry showed a higher proportion of abnormalities in symptomatic patients than in asymptomatic ones (73% versus 21%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Megarectum was detected in a similar proportion in the different subgroups regardless of the presence of symptoms or abnormalities in anorectal functions. Among non-Chagas disease patients with functional constipation, 90% had an abnormal anorectal manometry study. Patients with Chagas disease present a high proportion of constipation with dyssynergic defecation in anorectal manometry but a low prevalence of impaired rectoanal inhibitory reflex, although these abnormalities may be nonspecific for Chagas disease. The presence of megarectum is a nonspecific finding.

Mo2017 Dynamic Anal Ultrasonography Technique in the Assessment of Anorectal Dysfunction in Patients With Obstructed Defecation

Mo2017 Dynamic Anal Ultrasonography Technique in the Assessment of Anorectal Dysfunction in Patients With Obstructed Defecation

Anorectal dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.

Constipation and fecal incontinence are common in patients with neuromuscular diseases. Despite their high prevalence and potential impact on overall quality of life, few studies have addressed anorectal dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The goal of this paper is to define the prevalence, pathophysiology, impact, and potential treatment of constipation and incontinence in MS patients. Methods. The PubMed database was searched for English language publications between January 1973 and December 2011. Articles were reviewed to assess the definition of the study population, duration, type and severity of MS, sex distribution, prevalence, impact, results of physiologic testing, and treatments. Results. The reported prevalence of constipation and fecal incontinence ranged around 40%. Anorectal dysfunction significantly affected patients with nearly 1 in 6 patients limiting social activities or even quitting work due to symptoms. Caregivers listed toileting as a common and significant burden. The only randomized controlled trial showed a marginal improvement of constipation with abdominal massage. All other reports lacked control interventions and only demonstrated improvement in individuals with milder symptoms. Conclusion. Anorectal dysfunction is a common manifestation in MS that significantly affects quality of life. Therapies are at best moderately effective and often cumbersome, highlighting the need for simple and more helpful interventions.

Prospective Multicenter Trial Comparing Echodefecography With Defecography in the Assessment of Anorectal Dysfunction in Patients With Obstructed Defecation: Erratum

Prospective Multicenter Trial Comparing Echodefecography With Defecography in the Assessment of Anorectal Dysfunction in Patients With Obstructed Defecation: Erratum

Prospective Multicenter Trial Comparing Echodefecography With Defecography in the Assessment of Anorectal Dysfunction in Patients With Obstructed Defecation

Defecography is the gold standard for assessing functional anorectal disorders but is limited by the need for a specific radiologic environment, exposure of patients to radiation, and inability to show all anatomic structures involved in defecation. Echodefecography is a 3-dimensional dynamic ultrasound technique developed to overcome these limitations. This study was designed to validate the effectiveness of echodefecography compared with defecography in the assessment of anorectal dysfunctions related to obstructed defecation. Multicenter, prospective observational study. Women with symptoms of obstructed defecation. Six centers for colorectal surgery (3 in Brazil, 1 in Texas, 1 in Florida, and 1 in Venezuela). Defecography was performed after inserting 150 mL of barium paste in the rectum. Echodefecography was performed with a 2050 endoprobe through 3 automatic scans. The κ statistic was used to assess agreement between echodefecography and defecography in the evaluation of rectocele, intussusception, anismus, and grade III enterocele. Eighty-six women were evaluated: median Wexner constipation score, 13.4 (range, 6-23); median age, 53.4 (range, 26-77) years. Rectocele was identified with substantial agreement between the 2 methods (defecography, 80 patients; echodefecography, 76 patients; κ = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.48-0.73). The 2 techniques demonstrated identical findings in 6 patients without rectocele, and in 9 patients with grade I, 29 with grade II, and 19 patients with grade III rectoceles. Defecography identified rectal intussusception in 42 patients, with echodefecography identifying 37 of these cases, plus 4 additional cases, yielding substantial agreement (κ = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.57-1.0). Intussusception was associated with rectocele in 28 patients for both methods (κ = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.41-0.83). There was substantial agreement for anismus (κ = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.40-0.81) and for rectocele combined with anismus (κ = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.40-0.82). Agreement for grade III enterocele was classified as almost perfect (κ = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.66-1.0). Echodefecography had limited use in identification of grade I and II enteroceles because of the type of probe used. Echodefecography may be used to assess patients with obstructed defecation, as it is able to detect the same anorectal dysfunctions found by defecography. It is minimally invasive and well tolerated, avoids exposure to radiation, and clearly demonstrates all the anatomic structures involved in defecation.

S1230 Characterization and Pathophysiologic Mechanisms of Anorectal Dysfunction in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

S1230 Characterization and Pathophysiologic Mechanisms of Anorectal Dysfunction in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

Anorectal dysfunction in patients with urologic disturbance due to multiple sclerosis

Anorectal function was evaluated in 11 patients with voiding dysfunction due to multiple sclerosis. In six patients with constipation, three also had symptoms of obstructed defecation and one patient was incontinent due to stercoral diarrhea. One patient was only fecal incontinent and one patient had obstructed defecation as the only symptom. Three patients had no anorectal symptoms. Anal manometry in the women compared with a control group revealed significant lower anal resting and squeeze pressures, although no significant difference of rectal sensation to distention with air was found. Pudendal nerve terminal latencies were obtained in seven patients and were all normal. In four patients latency could not be demonstrated due to poor contraction of the sphincter on stimulation of the pudendal nerve. Two of these patients were incontinent and two had both constipation and obstructed defecation. It is concluded that patients with voiding symptoms due to multiple sclerosis often reveal anorectal symptoms or motility disorders. Although anal sphincter function is reduced, fecal incontinence is not prevalent in this group. The reason for this lies probably in the fact that many of the patients are constipated, thus securing fecal continence.