Anodal tDCS Research Articles

The cerebellum is involved in implicit motor sequence learning

BackgroundImplicit motor sequence learning (IMSL) is a cognitive function that allows us to execute multiple movements in a specific sequential order and plays a crucial role in our daily functional activities. Although the role of the basal ganglia network in IMSL is well-established, the exact involvement of the cerebellar network is less clear.AimHere, we aimed to address this issue by investigating the effects of cerebellar transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) on IMSL.MethodsIn this sham-controlled, crossover study in 45 healthy young adults, we used mixed-effects models to analyze sequence-specific (primary outcome) and general learning effects (secondary outcome) in the acquisition (during tDCS), short- (five minutes post-tDCS) and long-term consolidation (one week post-tDCS) phases of IMSL, as measured by the serial reaction time (SRT) task.ResultsAnalyses based on response times (RTs) revealed that anodal tDCS over the cerebellum significantly increased sequence-specific learning during acquisition, compared to sham (anodal: M = 38.24 ms, sham: M = 26.78 ms, p = 0.032); did not affect general learning; and significantly slowed overall RTs (anodal: M = 362.03 ms, sham: M = 356.37 ms, p = 0.049). Accuracy-based analyses revealed that anodal tDCS reduced the probability of correct responses occurring in random trials versus sequential trials by 1.17%, p = 0.009, whereas sham tDCS had no effect, p = 0.999.ConclusionOur finding of enhanced sequence-specific learning, but not general learning, suggests that the cerebellar network not only plays a role in error correction processes, but also serves a sequence-specific function within the integrated motor learning network that connects the basal ganglia and cerebellum.

Multimodal response-predictor analysis for three non-invasive brain stimulation protocols.

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) methods such as paired associative stimulation (PAS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) are used to modulate cortical excitability and reduce symptoms in a variety of psychiatric disorders. Recent studies have shown significant inter-individual variability in the physiological response to these techniques when they are applied over the hand representation of primary motor cortex (M1hand). The goal of the present study was to identify neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, and neurochemical baseline characteristics that may predict response to commonly used NIBS protocols using data from a previously published study (Therrien-Blanchet et al., 2023). To this end, PAS, anodal tDCS, and 20-Hz tACS were administered to healthy participants in a repeated measures design. Pre/Post differences in transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced input-output curves were used to quantify changes in corticospinal excitability. Primary predictors were late I-wave latency, cortical thickness (CT) of M1hand, and fractional anisotropy of the corticospinal tract (CSThand) originating from M1hand. Secondary exploratory analysis was performed with CT in areas outside motor cortex, diffusion MRI (dMRI) metrics of the CSThand, magnetic resonance spectroscopy measurements of GABA, glutamate, and n-acetyl aspartate of M1hand CST, baseline corticospinal excitability, and cranial circumference. Multiple regression analysis showed that none of the primary variables predicted intervention outcome for any of the NIBS protocols. Exploratory analysis revealed no significant correlation between predictor variables and PAS outcome. tDCS and tACS were significantly correlated with some baseline measures. These data suggest that modulation of cortical excitability following several NIBS protocols may not be easily predicted by baseline characteristics, underscoring the need for a better understanding of their mechanism of action. Significant exploratory associations need to be confirmed in larger samples and confirmatory designs.

Partially dissociative role of the left inferior frontal gyrus and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in reasoning.

Reasoning is the ability to formulate inferences or conclusions from available information. The two major types, deductive and inductive, are thought to rely on distinct cognitive mechanisms and recruit separate brain areas. Neuroimaging studies yield mixed results; some found the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) activations for deductive reasoning and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for inductive reasoning. This assumption was put to the test in the present study. In two double-blinded, sham-controlled experiments, high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) was used to systematically explore the left IFG's and DLPFC's causal role in deductive and inductive reasoning. Participants with no formal training in logic judged deductive and inductive arguments before and after 10 minutes of anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS of the left IFG (Experiment 1, n = 20) or left DLPFC (Experiment 2, n = 21). Left IFG anodal tDCS impairs reaction times (RTs) for easy categorical (p = < .001) and propositional (p = .025) deductive arguments and the accuracy for easy inductive propositional arguments (p = .003). Meanwhile, regardless of the active stimulation conditions, left DLPFC tDCS shortens RTs (anodal: p = < .001, cathodal: p = .014) and increases accuracy (anodal: p = .029, cathodal: p = .001) for difficult categorical inductive arguments, but decreases accuracy (anodal: p = .027, cathodal: p = < .001) for difficult propositional inductive arguments. The overall results showed a partial dissociation of the left frontal lobe areas subserving the two types of reasoning and argument difficulty-dependent stimulation effects. This study extends knowledge of the neural basis of reasoning and hopefully inspires interventions that could augment reasoning impairments associated with normal aging and brain lesions.

Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on intracranial compliance in the subacute phase of stroke

ObjectivesTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) increases cerebral blood flow. This study evaluated the effects of anodal tDCS (A-tDCS) on intracranial compliance (ICC) in patients with subacute stroke using a non-invasive method. MethodsThis was a randomized, proof-of-concept, double-blind, pilot study. Patients with ischemic stroke of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) were divided into the following two groups: 1) A-tDCS in the motor cortex on the affected side for 30min at 2mA, and 2) sham tDCS in the motor cortex on the affected side. The primary outcomes were intracranial compliance (P2/P1 ratio and time-to-peak [TTP]) and ICC normalization after the intervention (P2/P1 ratio <1). Secondary outcomes were systolic and diastolic blood pressures, heart rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation. ResultsNo significant differences were observed in the P2/P1 ratio (P = 0.509) and TTP (P = 0.480) between the groups. However, the A-tDCS group was significantly associated with a normal P2/P1 ratio after intervention (B = 2.583; standard error [SE]: 1.277; P = 0.043; corrected for age and stroke severity). No significant associations were observed between the groups and systolic blood pressure (F = 0.16; P = 0.902), diastolic blood pressure (F = 0.18; P = 0.892), heart rate (F = 0.11; P = 0.950), or peripheral oxygen saturation (F = 0.21; P = 0.750). ConclusionICC morphology normalization was observed in the A-tDCS group. However, no differences were observed in the P2/P1 ratio, TTP, or hemodynamic variables between the groups. A sample size of 66 patients with ischemic stroke of the MCA can be estimated using the observed effect size and standard α = 5% and β = 20% for future trials. Furthermore, this will aid in conducting the necessary randomized trials targeting these populations.

Enhancing multisensory rehabilitation of visual field defects with transcranial direct current stimulation: A randomized clinical trial.

Visual rehabilitation is necessary for improving the quality of life of patients with acquired homonymous visual field defects (HVFDs). By modulating brain excitability and plasticity, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may accelerate and increase the effects of compensatory trainings, which are usually long and intensive. In the present proof-of-principle, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study, we assess whether anodal tDCS applied over ipsilesional occipital or parietal cortices can increase the effects of a compensatory audiovisual training for HVFDs. Eighteen participants with chronic HVFDs were randomized to receive anodal or sham tDCS over the ipsilesional parietal or occipital cortex during a 2-week (10 days, 2 h/day) audiovisual treatment aimed at improving oculomotor visual field exploration. Improvements were assessed by administering visual detection with eye movements and visual search tests, and a questionnaire for activities of daily living (ADLs) before the treatment, at its end, and at 1-month and 4-month follow-ups; lesion analyses were performed to look for predictors of treatment effects. Anodal ipsilesional tDCS, regardless of the target area (occipital vs. parietal), speeds up and increases daily improvements during the training. Whereas long-lasting (up to 4 months) post-treatment improvements in visual search and ADLs were observed in all groups, a greater and stable increase of visual detections in the blind hemifield was brought about only by the adjuvant use of occipital tDCS. Compensatory audiovisual rehabilitation of HFVDs is effective and benefits from the adjuvant application of occipital and parietal tDCS, which speeds up and increases training-induced improvement. NCT06116760.

Exploring the Effect of Single-Session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Attention, Verbal Fluency, and Working Memory in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease-Related Dementia.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among the elderly. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applies low-intensity currents to the brain, resulting in short-term neurocognitive effects and long-term neuroplasticity enhancement. Limited research reported on the impact of tDCS on cognitive functions in dementia due to AD. This study aims to compare changes in verbal fluency and working memory following a single tDCS application to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in AD patients. Patients with mild dementia due to AD underwent cognitive assessment using the Standardized Mini-Mental Test, Clock Drawing Test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Functional Activities Questionnaire, Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale. A single-session tDCS was administered by applying anodal tDCS to the left DLPFC for a duration of 30 minutes. Verbal fluency and working memory were evaluated before and after tDCS using the WAIS-R Digit Span Test forward and backward subscales, Trail Making Test (TMT) A and B, and Verbal Fluency Test. Regarding cognitive test scores before and after tDCS application, there were statistically significant reductions in the durations of TMT-A and TMT-B. However, there were no significant differences observed for TMT B-A, VFT, DST-forward, and DST-backward performances. The findings indicate that a single anodal tDCS targeting the left DLPFC enhances attention and processing speed in AD patients but has no effect on working memory or verbal fluency.

Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.

The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS) encompasses cognitive and affective symptoms in patients with cerebellar disorders, for which no proven treatment is available. Our primary objective was to study the effect of cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive performance in CCAS patients. Secondary effects on ataxia severity, mood, and quality of life were explored. We performed a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Thirty-five patients with CCAS were included and received 10 sessions of 20 minutes sham (n = 17) or real (n = 18) tDCS, with a current of 2 mA. Cognitive performance was assessed using executive function subtests of the computerized Test of Attentional Performance (TAP), with the composite as primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes were ataxia severity, mood, and quality of life. Outcomes were evaluated 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-intervention. Cerebellar tDCS was well tolerated and no serious adverse events related to the intervention occurred. No significant tDCS effect was found on cognitive performance. Improvement on the TAP was observed in the sham group 1 month post-treatment (estimate = -0.248, 95% CI, -0.49 to -0.01), but not clinically relevant. A positive tDCS effect was observed for ataxia severity 1 month post-treatment (estimate = -0.985, 95% CI, -1.94 to -0.03). Ten sessions of 20 minutes cerebellar anodal tDCS did not prove efficacious for CCAS-related cognitive impairment, but a significant positive effect of tDCS was found for ataxia severity, aligning with previous findings indicative of tDCS as a therapeutic neuromodulation tool in cerebellar disorders. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reduces Pressure Pain Sensitivity in Patients With Noncancer Chronic Pain.

Noncancer chronic pain is a clinical challenge because pharmacological treatment often fails to relieve pain. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a treatment that could have the potential for pain relief and improvement in quality of life. However, there is a lack of clinical trials evaluating the effects of tDCS on the pain system. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of 5 days of anodal tDCS treatment on the pain system in patients with chronic noncancer pain using quantitative sensory testing and quality of life questionnaires: (1) Brief Pain Inventory-short form, (2) European Organization for Research and Treatment of Life Questionnaire-C30, and (3) Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale. Eleven patients with noncancer chronic pain (51 ± 13.6 y old, 5M) participated in the study. Anodal tDCS was applied for 5 consecutive days, followed by sham stimulation after a washout period of at least 2 weeks. Pressure pain thresholds and pain tolerance thresholds (PTT) were assessed in different body regions on days 1 and 5. Anodal tDCS appeared to maintain PTT at C5 (clavicle) on day 5, but sham stimulation decreased PTT ( P = 0.007). In addition, anodal tDCS increased PTT compared with sham at day 5 at Th10 ventral dermatomes ( P = 0.014). Both anodal and sham tDCS decreased the Brief Pain Inventory-short form total and interference scores, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Life Questionnaire-C30 fatigue score, but no interaction effect was observed. This study adds to the evidence in the literature that tDCS may be a potential therapeutic tool for the management of noncancer chronic pain.

The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex on Reactive Aggression in Intoxicated and Sober Individuals

Alcohol-related aggression is a widely observed phenomenon that has detrimental effects on both individuals and society, putatively caused by dysfunction in the prefrontal cortex. The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) plays a critical role in representing the reward value of future actions. Emerging research has suggested that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the vmPFC can reduce aggression. However, no study has examined whether tDCS can mitigate intoxicated aggression. In this study, 153 healthy participants consumed alcohol or not and completed the anger-infused Ultimatum Game with simultaneous double-blind anodal tDCS or sham over the bilateral vmPFC. For participants in the anodal tDCS condition, intoxicated participants were less aggressive than sober participants when insulted. However, among sober participants, anodal tDCS increased aggression. For participants in the alcohol condition, we observed no differences in aggression between the anodal tDCS and the sham tDCS conditions. These findings provide mixed support for tDCS as a means to attenuate intoxicated aggression.

Combined Effect of tDCS and Motor or Cognitive Activity in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Pilot Study.

(1) Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) accounts for 70% of dementia cases and with no effective pharmacological treatments, new rehabilitation methods are needed. Motor and cognitive activities and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have shown promise in stabilizing and enhancing cognitive functions. Objective: we want to investigate the effects of tDCS combined with motor or cognitive activity on cognitive functions in AD patients. (2) Methods: Patients with mild or moderate AD were randomized between anodic tDCS groups (MotA or CogA) and sham tDCS groups (MotS or CogS). They received two weeks of treatment (45 min, five days/week), with the first 15 min using tDCS stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Cognitive assessments were conducted pre-treatment (T0), post-treatment (T1), and one week after (T2). (3) Results: Twenty-three patients were included. Statistical analysis showed significant differences between anodic tDCS groups (MotA + CogA) and sham tDCS groups (MotS + CogS) with advantages for the first in improving global cognitive status (p = 0.042), selective attention (p = 0.012), and sustained attention (p = 0.012). Further analysis indicated no differences between the two anodic tDCS groups between T0 and T1. (4) Conclusions: combined anodal tDCS with motor or cognitive activity could improve global cognitive state and attention, slowing cognitive decline in AD patients. The trial was registered on Clinical Trials: NCT06619795.

Anodal tDCS improves neuromuscular adaptations to short-term resistance training of the knee extensors in healthy individuals.

Experimental studies showed improvement in physical performance following acute application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). This study examined the neuromuscular and neural response to a single training session (Part 1) and after a 3-week resistance training (Part 2) performed with the knee extensors, preceded by tDCS over the primary motor cortex. Twenty-four participants (age, 30 ± 7 years; stature, 172 ± 8 cm; mass, 72 ± 15 kg) were randomly allocated to perform either resistance training with anodal tDCS (a-tDCS), or by a placebo tDCS (Sham). Resistance training consisted of 3 × 10 isometric contractions of 3 s at 75% MVC. Measures of neuromuscular function (MVC, voluntary activation and potentiated twitch force), corticospinal excitability, and short and long cortical inhibition were assessed. Acute tDCS did not affect neuromuscular and neural responses to a single training session (all ps ≥ 0.10). Conversely, after the 3-week training program, MVC increased in both groups (p < 0.01), with a greater increase observed for a-tDCS vs. Sham (⁓6%, p = 0.04). Additionally, increased voluntary activation (⁓2%, p = 0.04) and corticospinal excitability (⁓22%, p = 0.04), accompanied with shorter silent period (-13%, p = 0.04) was found following a-tDCS vs. Sham. The potentiated twitch force and measures of short and long cortical inhibition did not change after training programme (all ps ≥ 0.29). Pre-training administration of tDCS only resulted in greater neuromuscular adaptations following 3-weeks of resistance training. These results provide new evidence that tDCS facilitates adaptations to resistance training in healthy individuals.

Cerebellar non-invasive stimulation of social and emotional mentalizing: A meta-analysis

Abstract The present meta-analysis investigated the impact of non-invasive stimulation, using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) targeting the posterior cerebellum, on social and emotional mentalizing about others. Prior research has convincingly shown that the posterior cerebellum supports social and emotional cognition. We identified 14 studies targeting the cerebellum with appropriate control conditions (i.e., sham, control site), which exclude general learning effects of the task or placebo effects. The studies included 29 task conditions where stimulation before or during a social or emotional task was applied on healthy samples. The results showed significant evidence that sustained anodal tDCS and TMS generally improved social and emotional performance after stimulation, in comparison with sham or control conditions, with a small effect size. In contrast, cathodal stimulation showed mixed facilitatory and inhibitory results. In addition, short TMS pulses, administered with the aim of interfering with ongoing social or emotional processes, induced a small but consistent inhibitory effect. Control tasks without social or emotional components also showed significant improvement after sustained anodal tDCS and TMS, suggesting that transcranial stimulation of the cerebellum may also improve other functions. This was not the case for short TMS pulses, which did not modulate non-social and non-emotional control tasks. Taken together, this meta-analysis shows that cerebellar neurostimulation confirms a causal role of the cerebellum in socio-emotional cognition, has a small but significant effect on improving socio-emotional skills, and may, therefore, have important clinical applications in pathologies where social and emotional cognition is impaired.

Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on tinnitus modulation: A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial: Effect of tDCS on tinnitus modulation: A clinical trial

ObjectivesTo evaluate the short and long-term effects of anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) targeting the left temporoparietal area (LTA) on tinnitus severity, annoyance, and loudness. MethodsThis is a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, and parallel-group clinical trial. A total of 42 individuals with tinnitus were randomized to a-tDCS (n = 24) or sham tDCS (n = 18). The a-tDCS group received tDCS over the LTA during five consecutive day sessions (2 mA, 20 min). The sham group received a placebo current with the same characteristics as the a-tDCS group. Participants were assessed at baseline, after the fifth session, and at the 30-day follow-up, using hearing assessments and symptom questionnaires. ResultsThere was no effect of comparison between groups or interaction effect (time x group) in all hearing assessments and symptom questionnaires. There was only a main effect of time for Tinnitus Handicap Inventory - THI [F(1.642, 45.988) = 5.128; p = 0.014; η2 = 0.155]. Bonferroni post hoc showed that there was a significant difference in THI in the sham group between pre and post-treatment [CI (0.107, 14.643; p = 0.046)]. However, there was no difference between pre-treatment and follow-up THI, or between post-treatment and follow-up THI. There was no treatment effect on tinnitus severity (assessed by Tinnitus Functional Inventory - TFI), tinnitus annoyance or loudness (assessed by Visual Analogue Scale - VAS), or tinnitus pitch, loudness or minimum masking level (assessed by tinnitometry). ConclusionFive consecutive sessions of a-tDCS targeting LTA do not improve tinnitus severity, annoyance, and loudness. Future studies should investigate if other tDCS protocols are effective or a combination of tDCS with other forms of treatment.

Comparing the effects of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex at varying intensities on motor learning in healthy young adults.

Inconsistent results are observed in the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with different montages on motor learning. This study aimed to compare the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) over primary motor cortex (M1) at different intensities on motor learning in healthy young adults. The participants were randomly divided into: (1) 1mA M1 c-tDCS, (2) 1mA M1 anodal tDCS (a-tDCS), (3) 2mA M1 c-tDCS, (4) 2mA M1 a-tDCS and (5) M1 sham tDCS groups. The groups received 20-min stimulation with serial reaction time task (SRTT) incidentally, while the tDCS was turned off after 30 s in the sham tDCS group. Response time (RT) and error rate (ER) during SRTT were assessed prior, during and 72 h after the intervention. The results of the paired t-test indicated that online learning occurred in all groups (p< 0.05), except in M1 c-tDCS (1mA) (p> 0.05). One-way ANOVA analysis also indicated that there were differences in offline learning (RT (F(DF) =5.19(4); p< 0.001; and ER (F(DF) =9(4), p< 0.0001) among groups, with more offline learning in 1mA M1 a-tDCS, 2mA M1 c-tDCS and 2mA M1 a-tDCS groups (p< 0.05). On the other hand, the 1mA M1 c-tDCS group did not indicate any consolidation effect or even a trend toward negative offline learning. M1 a-tDCS with different intensities and also 2mA M1 c-tDCS may be helpful for the enhancement of motor learning in young healthy adults. This study enhances our understanding of tDCS intensity and polarity effects on motor learning, with potential for optimizing therapeutic protocols.

The Impact of Bilateral Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Balance Control in Healthy Young Adults.

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to influence movement functions, but little is known about the specific effects of stimulation polarity on balance control. This study investigated the impact of bilateral cerebellar tDCS on balance functions as a function of stimulation polarity. In this randomized, controlled trial, thirty-nine healthy young adults were assigned to one of three groups: right anodal/left cathodal cerebellar stimulation (AC group), right cathodal/left anodal cerebellar stimulation (CA group), and a control sham group. Each participant underwent a daily 30-minute session of tDCS at 2mA for one week. Balance function was assessed pre- and post-intervention and the data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations. The CA group exhibited a significant reduction in sway area when standing on the left leg and on both stable and unstable surfaces with eyes open, compared to both the AC and sham groups. However, there were no significant differences among the groups in terms of sway length, anteroposterior velocity, or mediolateral velocity. Our results indicate the polarity-dependent effects of bilateral cerebellar tDCS on balance functions, with enhanced stability observed only following cathodal tDCS over the right cerebellum paired with anodal tDCS over the left cerebellum. This polarity-specific modulation may have implications for developing cerebellar neuromodulation interventions for movement disorders.

Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Over the Primary Motor Cortex and Cerebellum Improves Balance and Shooting Accuracy in Elite Ice Hockey Players.

To investigate the effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and cerebellum on balance control and shooting accuracy in elite ice hockey players. Twenty-one elite ice hockey players underwent anodal tDCS over theM1 (a-tDCSM1), anodal tDCS over the cerebellum (a-tDCSCB), concurrent dual-site anodal tDCS over the M1 and the cerebellum (a-tDCSM1+CB), and sham stimulation (tDCSSHAM). Before and after receiving tDCS (2mA for 15min), participants completed an ice hockey shooting-accuracy test, Pro-Kin balance test (includes stance test and proprioceptive assessment), and Y-balance test in randomized order. For static balance performance, the ellipse area in the 2-legged stance with eyes open and the 1-legged stance with the dominant leg significantly improved following a-tDCSM1, a-tDCSCB, and concurrent dual-site a-tDCSM1+CB, compared with tDCSSHAM (all P < .05, Cohen d = 0.64-1.06). In dynamic balance performance, the average trace error of the proprioceptive assessment and the composite score of the Y-balance test with the dominant leg significantly improved following a-tDCSM1 and concurrent dual-site a-tDCSM1+CB (all P < .05, Cohen d = 0.77-1.00). For the ice hockey shooting-accuracy test, shooting-accuracy while standing on the unstable platform significantly increased following a-tDCSM1 (P = .010, Cohen d = 0.81) and a-tDCSCB (P = .010, Cohen d = 0.92) compared with tDCSSHAM. tDCS could potentially be a valuable tool in enhancing static and dynamic balance and shooting accuracy on unstable platforms in elite ice hockey players.

Multisession tDCS combined with intrastimulation training improves emotion recognition in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder

Previous studies indicate that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising emerging treatment option for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and its efficacy could be augmented using concurrent training. However, no intrastimulation social cognition training for ASD has been developed so far. The objective of this two-armed, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial is to investigate the effects of tDCS combined with a newly developed intrastimulation social cognition training on adolescents with ASD. Twenty-two male adolescents with ASD were randomly assigned to receive 10 sessions of either anodal or sham tDCS at F3/right supraorbital region together with online intrastimulation training comprising basic and complex emotion recognition tasks. Using baseline magnetic resonance imaging data, individual electric field distributions were simulated, and brain activation patterns of the training tasks were analyzed. Additionally, questionnaires were administered at baseline and following the intervention. Compared to sham tDCS, anodal tDCS significantly improved dynamic emotion recognition over the course of the sessions. This task also showed the highest activations in face processing regions. Moreover, the improvement was associated with electric field density at the medial prefrontal cortex and social awareness in exploratory analyses. Both groups showed high tolerability and acceptability of tDCS, and significant improvement in overall ASD symptoms. Taken together, multisession tDCS improved dynamic emotion recognition in adolescents with ASD using a task that activates brain regions associated with the social brain network. The variability in the electric field might diminish tDCS effects and future studies should investigate individualized approaches.

Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on postural stability in subacute stroke: A randomized control trial.

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) promotes neuromodulation and neuroplasticity in the brain. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term effects of the anodal tDCS on postural and trunk stability, physical performance, anticipatory postural adjustment and quality of life in sub-acute stroke patients. Thirty-six participants with sub-acute stroke were divided into experimental and control groups using sealed envelope randomization. Outcome measures comprised the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke, Trunk Impairment Scale, Time Up and Go Test, Functional Reach Test, and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale. Assessments were conducted at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks. Within-group analysis revealed significant improvement in both the experimental (p-value < 0.05) and control groups (p-value < 0.005). Notably, significant effects were observed in postural stability after intervention, and during one of the detraining assessments, the experimental group showed superior results compared to the control group in subacute stroke. Anodal tDCS yield significant short- and long-term effects on postural stability, while short term effects on trunk stability. Additionally, long term effects were observed on the physical performance and anticipatory postural adjustments while no effects at quality of life either short or long term basis among the subacute stroke patients.

Efficacy of Bihemispheric tDCS in Rehabilitation of Non-Fluent Aphasia: A Single-subject Pilot Study

Objective: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a potentially effective complementary tool in rehabilitation of aphasia. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal tDCS montage to augment language outcomes in aphasia. Against this background, the present study aimed to examine efficacy of tDCS combined with language therapy in aphasia rehabilitation and to compare two different montages. Methods: A right-handed participant suffering from chronic, non-fluent aphasia following stroke affecting the left hemisphere underwent a 5-week procedure involving tDCS coupled with language therapy. The procedure comprised two 5-day treatments of bihemispheric tDCS (over inferior frontal and posterior temporal sites determined using the international 10-20 EEG system). As part of both treatments, the left hemispheric targets were excited through anodal tDCS while simultaneously inhibiting their right-hemispheric homologues through cathodal tDCS. Baseline, post-treatment and follow-up assessments were obtained using a comprehensive language assessment tool. Results: An increase in language outcomes, particularly in repetition, was observed following the treatments. It was also found that therapy gains were more robust following bihemispheric stimulation of the posterior temporal sites compared to the inferior frontal targets. Conclusion: Bihemispheric tDCS coupled with language therapy appears to be effective in remediating language symptoms, particularly in terms of the repetition ability, in aphasia.

TDCS and local scalp cooling do not change corticomotor and intracortical excitability in healthy humans

ObjectiveScalp cooling might increase the long-term potentiation (LTP)-like effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) by reducing the threshold for after-effects according to metaplasticity and increasing electrical current density reaching the cortical neurons. We aimed to investigate whether priming scalp cooling potentiates the tDCS after-effect on motor cortex excitability. MethodsThis study had a randomized, parallel-arms, sham-controlled, double-blinded design with an adequately powered sample of 105 healthy subjects. Corticomotor and intracortical excitability were assessed with motor evoked potentials (MEP) from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) paradigms. Subjects were randomly allocated into six intervention groups, including anodal and cathodal tDCS (1-mA/20-min), scalp cooling, and sham. MEPs were recorded before, immediately, and 15 min after the interventions. ResultsWe did not observe changes in MEP amplitude from single-pulse TMS, SICI, and ICF with any intervention protocol. ConclusionAnodal and cathodal tDCS did not have an LTP-like neuromodulatory effect on corticospinal and did not provide detectable GABAergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission changes, which were not influenced by priming scalp cooling. SignificanceWe provide strong evidence that tDCS (1-mA/20-min) does not alter corticomotor and intracortical excitability with or without priming scalp cooling.