Acquisition Announcements Research Articles

Do acquirers care about credit rating consequences? Evidence from credit rating watches

We analyze corporate acquisition announcements and the feedback of credit rating agencies by placing the acquirer’s issuer rating under formal review for a potential change. We show that acquisitions are 42.8% more likely to be withdrawn if the firm’s rating is placed on review for downgrade. Focusing on completed acquisitions, deals associated with reviews for downgrade need approximately 40% more time to be completed, and acquirers are twice as likely to be downgraded in the first year (13.4% versus 25.2%). The stock market considers the probability of an acquirer’s downgrade as deals with increased downgrade risk show lower abnormal announcement returns. We do not find evidence that reviews of rating agencies are anticipated by firms.

Analyst recommendations, acquirer’s valuation, and M&A performance: evidence from China

ABSTRACT This study investigates the effects of premerger analyst recommendations on mergers and acquisitions (M&A) announcement returns. We find that M&A announcement returns decrease with premerger analysts’ favourable recommendations (PAFR). Furthermore, we find that increasing acquirers’ valuations in the preannouncement period is a possible channel that allows PAFR to reduce M&A announcement returns. We explore three alternative explanations including, ‘analyst information role’, ‘analyst pressure’ and ‘informed trading’ explanations for our main nexus, and our findings are still robust. In an additional analysis, we find that this negative relationship is more pronounced among acquirers with (a) high information uncertainty (b), low media criticism, and (c) high investor attention. Moreover, we identify three sources of conflicts of interest in analyst recommendations: M&A relations, controlling shareholder share pledging, and stock ownership composition. Our research enriches the impact of analysts’ recommendations on M&A outcomes and provides new empirical evidence of analysts’ strengthening of overvaluation.

Does continuous disclosure affect the market reaction to mergers and acquisitions announcements?

We examine the association between the degree of continuous disclosure by bidders and the market reaction to the announcement of 3512 mergers and acquisitions (M&As) by Australian bidders during the period 2000–2017. Using four proxies for continuous disclosure (total number of disclosures, total number of sensitive disclosures, total number of pages, and total number of sensitive pages), we find a positive association between the market reaction to M&A announcements and the level of continuous disclosure made by bidders. These findings imply that investors, when assessing M&A deals, find bidders' disclosures to be informative and value relevant. Further analyses reveal that this positive association is more pronounced for private target acquisitions, stock-financed acquisitions, and unrelated acquisitions.

Impact of Mergers & Acquisitions Announcements on Stock Prices

This study examines the impact of M&A announcements on stock prices in India, by utilizing event study methodology and a dataset of 15 announcements. It identifies dynamic trends in stock performance before and after theannouncements. The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH), which posits that the market incorporates all relevant information, is evident in stock price volatility. The post-COVID-19 market environment has heightened investor caution due to substantial losses. The research, covering M&A announcements from 2014 to 2023, uniquely contributes by analysing pre- and post-COVID investor sentiments. Although substantial results were produced, the analysis of Abnormal Returns (AR) and Cumulative Average Abnormal Returns (CAAR) indicates that M&A announcements did not significantly impact overall stock performance, thereby supporting the EMH. These findings provide valuable insights into market responses to M&A in India, benefiting investors, business strategists, policymakers, and other stakeholders.

Moderating Effects of Dividend Policy Consistency and ROA on Firm Performance in M&A

The occurrence of a positive abnormal return is the dream of every investor in dealing with the decisions taken by the company, because it can provide its own benefits for stakeholders. Therefore, what can create positive abnormality around the announcement of company decision-making, especially Merger and Acquisition (M&A) decisions? To reveal several factors that can create positive abnormal returns around M&A announcements, this study aims to determine the effect of dividend-paying firms on short-term M&A performance which is moderated by the consistency of dividend policy and Return on Assets (ROA) and controlled by size. company using multiple linear regression model. The data used in this research comprises companies in Indonesia that conducted M&A during the period 2002-2021. The total number of observations in this study is 150, and the research employs the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) technique for analysis. The results of this study indicate that dividend-paying firm has a significant positive effect on short-term M&A performance. The consistency of dividend policy cannot strengthen the positive relationship between dividend-paying firms and short-term M&A performance, but the firm's performance as reflected in ROA, strengthen the positive effect of dividend-paying firms on short-term M&A performance.

Predicting Market Reactions to Acquisition Announcements and Its Role in Acquisition Decision Making

Predicting Market Reactions to Acquisition Announcements and Its Role in Acquisition Decision Making

Does Corporate Social Responsibility Create Value in Acquisitions? Evidence from the German Market

This paper examines the impact of a firm’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) level on abnormal stock returns around merger and acquisitions (M&A) announcements. Using a sample of transactions announced by German DAX-listed acquirers from 2017 and 2022, the analysis assesses whether CSR creates value for acquiring firms’ shareholders and offers a comprehensive discussion of potential factors supporting or opposing this notion. Our study seeks to fill a notable gap in the German literature on the relationship between CSR performance and abnormal stock returns surrounding M&A announcements. Building upon prior research findings in the US and in an international sample, our investigation focuses on the German market. Employing event study methodology, our results indicate that M&A transactions of German-listed acquirers did not yield significant negative or positive cumulative abnormal returns for event windows of 3 and 11 days. Furthermore, based on multiple linear regression, no evidence was found that CSR positively or negatively influenced abnormal stock returns following M&A announcements, suggesting that positive and negative effects potentially offset each other. The outcomes of our research have important implications for investors, as CSR initiatives do not serve as a positive trading signal, guaranteeing excess returns, which contrasts findings from previous studies in other developed countries. For managers, it is essential to concentrate on factors beyond CSR performance, such as synergies and fit. Finally, both managers and investors should not view CSR as a shareholder value-enhancing short-term investment but as an integral component of fostering sustainable business development.

Do takeover premiums hurt post-acquisition performance? – Marketing capabilities matter!

PurposeThe primary aim of this study is to resolve a longstanding debate concerning the impact of takeover premiums on post-acquisition performance. Specifically, we aim to examine how acquirers' marketing capabilities and payment methods moderate the relationship between takeover premiums and post-acquisition performance.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs linear regression to examine the relationship between acquirers' marketing capabilities, payment methods, takeover premiums and post-acquisition performance in the Chinese manufacturing industry. Data for the analysis were collected from both mergers and acquisition (M&A) announcements and the China Stock Market & Accounting Research Database (CSMAR), covering 1,169 acquisitions from 2012 to 2021.FindingsThe results indicate that acquirers' marketing capabilities moderate the impact of takeover premiums on post-acquisition performance. When acquirers possess strong marketing capabilities, takeover premiums increase post-acquisition performance. Conversely, when acquirers lack strong marketing capabilities, takeover premiums are not significantly related to post-acquisition performance. Additionally, it is noteworthy that takeover premiums show a positive correlation with post-acquisition performance, irrespective of the payment methods employed by acquirers for target firms.Originality/valueGiven that takeover premiums are essential for acquiring resources from target firms, it is crucial to maximize the value of these acquired resources. Our findings suggest that acquirers with weaker marketing capabilities before the deal should consider a more conservative approach to pricing target firms.

NAV Ratios and REIT Takeovers: The Role of Public and Private Deal Premiums

We investigate how net asset values (NAVs) impact equity real estate investment trusts (REITs) in the market for corporate control. REITs trading at discounts to NAV are more likely to be acquired than those trading at premiums to NAV. For each acquisition, there is a public deal premium (the deal value relative to stock price) and a private deal premium (the deal value relative to NAV). REITs trading at discounts to NAV command larger public deal premiums and smaller private deal premiums. Shareholders of targets respond more favorably if the REIT is trading at a discount to NAV. Three-day cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) around acquisition announcements are 11% higher for targeted REITs that are trading below a price-to-NAV ratio of 0.95 than those trading at a price-to-NAV ratio above 1.05. The sale of a REIT trading at a discount to NAV appears to be a productive transaction for both acquirers and targets.

Do women in the boardroom influence foreign acquisitions' premium and outcomes? Evidence from China

AbstractThis paper examines whether gender diversity influences foreign merger and acquisition (M&A) premiums and outcomes in China. Consistent with agency and resource dependence theories, we find that female directors significantly reduce the acquisition premium paid for foreign targets. We show that the market responds positively in the short‐term (measured by cumulative abnormal returns) to the announcement of foreign acquisitions by firms with greater female representation in the boardroom. We further find significant evidence that acquirers' boards comprising more female directors experience value creation and better operating synergies (measured by buy‐and‐hold abnormal returns and changes in return on assets) in the long‐term following engagement in foreign M&A deals. Interestingly, after distinguishing between female independent and executive directors, we find that our previous finding on board gender diversity can be attributable to both the monitoring (independent directors) and supervisory (executive directors) roles played by female directors. We also find evidence accords with the argument of the critical mass of female directors' representation in the boardroom. Our results are robust after controlling for endogeneity issues using instrumental variables (IV), propensity score matching (PSM), Heckman, and firm fixed‐effects methods. Overall, our findings offer additional empirical support for the global concern by regulators for improving corporate governance practices by increasing female quotas in the boardroom.

Acquisitions and social capital

AbstractWe examine the association between the social capital—social norms that encourage altruism and discourage opportunism—in the state of the firm's headquarters and the acquisitions it makes. We find that the cumulative abnormal return around an acquisition announcement is high when an acquirer is headquartered in a high social capital state in the United States. This effect is robust and incremental to the effect of a firm's corporate social responsibility (CSR) ratings and economically comparable to the effect of corporate governance. The effect of social capital is stronger for firms that have lower CSR ratings, which indicates social capital may act as a substitute for CSR. An additional analysis shows that social capital's effect is stronger in a subsample of firms with weak corporate governance. Acquirers from states with high social capital also demonstrate less hubris in acquiring targets than those from states with low social capital as the evidence of lower bid premiums indicates. Overall, our results show that the social norms that social capital measures mitigate potential agency problems in acquisitions by inducing managers to honor their obligations to shareholders.

Improvement in sustainability: Evidence from the mergers and acquisitions market

One approach to improve a firm’s Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) rating is to acquire a target with a higher relative ESG rating. We explore changes in an acquirer’s ESG rating around merger and acquisition (M&A) announcements and provide empirical evidence of a positive relationship between the change in an acquirer’s ESG rating and the target’s relative ESG rating. Of the three components of an ESG rating, an acquirer’s environmental rating displays the largest increase, with social and governance ratings exhibiting a smaller but still significant post-merger increase. This relationship is weaker for cross-border deals or cross-industry deals. However, deals that are both cross-border and same-industry are associated with a larger increase in an acquirer’s ESG rating. In addition to improved ESG ratings, the acquisition of a firm with a superior ESG rating is also associated with higher bid premiums and improved post-merger financial performance which suggests that acquirers act in shareholders’ best interests. JEL Classification: G14, G34

Financial resource pooling in club deals

Using a novel hand-collected dataset on leveraged buyouts, this study tests non-mutually exclusive hypotheses for club formation: collusion; financial resource pooling, either due to the riskiness of the target firm or to the fund’s investment limits; and experience. Results of the empirical analysis support the resource pooling motivation: club deals allow their members to buy larger targets and to reduce their equity commitment compared to solo deals. As the amount of equity they should commit to a deal increases, private equity buyers’ preference for club deals becomes stronger. Evidence also demonstrates that club deals do not harm competition, in that they are associated with a higher level of competition occurring in the private phase of deal negotiations. Targets’ stock price reactions around the acquisition announcements and takeover premiums are similar in solo deals and club deals. Finally, club deals are more likely created when private equity funds are less experienced.

Does Continuous Disclosure Affect the Market Reaction to Acquisition Announcements?

Does Continuous Disclosure Affect the Market Reaction to Acquisition Announcements?

How Systemic Crises Uproot and Re‐establish Investors’ Acquisition ‘Recipes’: A Temporally Bracketed Qualitative Comparative Analysis

AbstractWe contribute to the literature on acquisitions by examining how investors’ cognitive schemata codifying their beliefs concerning the attributes of deal success (‘recipes’) are impacted by systemic crises. Specifically, we examine how and why configurations of attributes signalling deal attractiveness, acquirer competence, and acquirer corporate governance shape investors’ reactions to acquisition announcements before, during, and after the Great Financial Crisis of 2008–9. We apply temporally bracketed fuzzy sets qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) on a sample of 1867 acquisition announcements. Our results show that investors not only assess acquisition signals holistically, but also that their preferences change when a crisis uproots orthodox deal ‘recipes’ that were once believed to produce successful outcomes. We show that the explorative nature of investor behaviour changes when systemic crises strike, with investors becoming more explorative – as evidenced by a greater number of ‘recipes’ eliciting positive reactions – during crises than before or after. Second, we find that investors do not simply favour deals with a maximum number of safeguards, but rather employ a compensatory logic that matches attributes signalling deal risk with specific assurances. The importance of offering assurances increases following crises, suggesting that investors progressively prefer acquirers to protect their interests.

Abnormal Returns: Takeover Prediction Modelling - Shanghai Stock Exchange

Around the Merge and Acquisition (M&A) announcement date, the targets will experience dramatic increases in their share price. The movement of share pricesbrings investment opportunities. To successfully predict the future targets and make an investment strategy, investors can obtain the abnormal return from the increment of the share price. However, many articles of research show that even successfully predicted large numbers of targets, within the investment portfolio, are still unable to show the abnormal return. To make a successful investment strategy, researchers summarized the potential negative factors of the portfolios' return. For example, the investment timing, the distressed firms which share the common characteristics with predicted targets. This paper motivated by the potential improvement space for target portfolio's return, attempts to rationalised a successful investment portfolio. Through selecting the determinate characteristics of targets, building a prediction model, studying its abnormal return and analysing the influence of a distressed firm on the abnormal return, this paper determines that the targets can be distinguished from non-targets with the characteristics of inefficient management, misevaluation, high sales growth, low liquidity and larger free cash flow; consistent with determinant characters, the prediction model has a good predictability; however, good predictability could not produce the abnormal return; furthermore, even the empirical result shows that the target portfolio actually involves a certain percentage of the distressed firms which have significant differences from no-distressed firms, the portfolio can still not obtain abnormal return by screening the distressed firms using its characteristics.

Corporate social responsibility reporting and investment: Evidence from mergers and acquisitions

AbstractWhile corporate social responsibility (CSR) has played an increasingly important role in corporate decision‐making, the role of CSR disclosure in a firm's investment activities remains poorly understood. This study investigates the impact of CSR disclosure on mergers and acquisitions (M&As), which are pivotal investment activities. We find that firms disclosing voluntary CSR reports experience significantly stronger market reactions to M&A announcements than those that do not disclose such reports. Specifically, acquisitions by voluntary CSR disclosers achieve 1.2% higher returns upon acquisition announcements, leading to a substantial increase in shareholder value. Our findings are consistent across a series of robustness tests. Additional analyses suggest that the positive market reactions are especially tied to voluntary disclosures concerning the protection of employees and customers, and that the quality and financial materiality of voluntary CSR disclosures amplify positive market responses. We also find that voluntary CSR disclosers exhibit better long‐term post‐acquisition market and operational performance. Collectively, our findings suggest that voluntary CSR disclosures bolster acquisition returns by mitigating stakeholder resistance. Additionally, by leveraging the unique conditional CSR disclosure regulation in China and using a staggered DID design, we observe a diminished market reaction for acquirers following mandatory CSR disclosures. Overall, this research provides new insights into the contrasting effects of voluntary and mandatory CSR disclosures, emphasizing the vital role of effective stakeholder CSR communication in the success of M&As.

Exploring the acquisition behavior of penny stock firms

We document that penny stock firms' acquisition likelihood increases with firm size, sales growth, free cash flow, stock price volatility, and run-up, but decreases with leverage, the number of years since IPO, and Tobin's Q. These findings are validated in a stepwise regression framework and are robust to alternative model specifications. Penny stock acquirers prefer public targets and are more (less) likely to use stocks (cash) as the payment method. We also find that acquisitions announcement returns are higher for penny stock firms than for non-penny stock firms, even after accounting for firm- and deal-characteristics. Further analyses indicate that the increase in announcement returns is driven by the firm's improved information environment. Overall, we document that penny stock firms are significant players in the market for corporate control.

Corporate acquisitions and firm-level uncertainty: Domestic versus cross-border deals

This paper investigates how the announcement of acquisitions affect the uncertainty that financial markets perceive about acquiring firms. We use data for publicly-listed firms in the UK between 2004 and 2017 and employ a matching estimator combined with difference-in-differences to address the endogenous selection of firms into acquisitions. While acquisition announcements do not result in a significant change in the volatility of stock returns of acquiring firms across our whole sample, this result hides substantial heterogeneity. Our main finding is that the impact of acquisitions on uncertainty is crucially shaped by a deal's geographic scope—i.e. whether the takeover involves a target in the same country or abroad. Domestic deals reduce the volatility of acquirers' returns by 5% on average one quarter after the announcement, while acquiring a foreign firm increases volatility by a similar magnitude. The heightened volatility resulting from cross-border transactions is primarily driven by acquisitions in industries characterized by high investment irreversibility and foreign markets where barriers to investment are higher. Conversely, the volatility reduction following domestic acquisitions is more pronounced in industries with low irreversibility. Additionally, characteristics of the deal itself, such as the relative size of the acquisition, the payment method, and whether the deal achieves majority control of the target, also play an important role in mediating the effect of acquisitions on volatility.

Enforcing Disclosure Compliance in Mergers and Acquisitions: Evidence from China

This study examines how enforcement of acquisition disclosure regulation affects investors’ assessment of the transactions’ quality at merger and acquisition (M&A) announcements. Using a novel sample of comment letters on acquisition filings by public companies in China, we document that regulatory requests for disclosure enhancement and clarifications are more common on lower quality transactions obfuscated by weaker disclosure as evidenced by (i) a lower likelihood of the deal closing, and if the deal does close, lower post-deal firm profitability; and, (ii) a greater likelihood of subsequent goodwill impairment. Using entropy balancing matching, we document that transactions that receive comment letters associate with significant negative bidder announcement returns suggesting that regulatory actions reveal new information that aids investors to identify lower quality deals. The negative price effect is greater when comment letters have more acquisition-specific comments, compared to letters with more comments on general accounting and governance issues. Our results showcase that enforcing disclosure compliance in M&A filings aids investors in assessing the quality of M&A transactions at the time when the filings are made public.