Book Reviews Further Letters ofJoanna Baillie. Edited by Thomas McLean. Madison and Teaneck, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2010. Pp. 296. $67.50. In Thomas McLean’s introduction to his collection, Further Letters ofJoanna Baillie, he notes the “rather remarkable and frustrating fact” that none of Baillie’s letters written during the first thirty-seven years of her life have as yet been discovered—due to “(alas) her habit of burning old correspon dence” (23). But clearly this habit changed between the time when Baillie was identified as the author of A Series of Plays in 1800 and her death in 1851, because another 234 missives have now emerged from archives all over the world, adding to the trove of Baillie letters published by Judith Bailey Slagle in her two-volume collection in 1999. Moreover, since the publication of McLean’s edition of letters in 2010, another thirty unpub lished letters have surfaced, which suggests that many more libraries— public and private—may eventually divulge Baillie correspondence. With this in mind, McLean has created (with the help of Regina Hewitt, Laura Mandell, and Mike Quilligan) an online chronology of Baillie’s correspon dence, which is available free of charge on the Romantic Circles website. McLean’s book provides an important addition to the burgeoning schol arship on Baillie, and his introduction helpfully suggests the insights he be lieves this new edition of letters gives into her relationships with contem poraries such as Sir Walter Scott, Robert Southey, Lady Byron, Sir John Herschel, and William Wordsworth (“He looks like a man that one must not speak to unless one has some sensible thing to say,” Baillie wrote in 1837 [181]). The collection also provides “examples of Baillie’s generosity to both friends and strangers in difficult circumstances” (26); her support of young writers; her “interest in the United States” (23); and her “uneven relationship with Sarah Siddons” (24). In addition, McLean writes, the Baillie letters in this collection “enhance our understanding ofBaillie’s rela tionship to Scotland” by extending “our knowledge of Baillie’s relation ships with contemporary Scottish writers, including Elizabeth Hamilton, Anne Grant, and Hector MacNeill, as well as Thomas Campbell, scientist Mary Somerville, and Captain Alexander Dirom” (25). But the “most significant addition to our conception ofBaillie and the contemporary the ater world,” in McLean’s view, comes from Baillie’s letters to George and SiR, 51 (Fall 2012) 449 450 BOOK REVIEWS Sarah Bartley; while nine appeared in The Collected Letters, seventeen more have come to light. George Bartley was “best known for his Falstaff,” and Sarah Bartley (when she was Sarah Smith) “was briefly hailed as the succes sor of Sarah Siddons” (24). One of the reasons Baillie was so interested in this pair is that “the Bartleys hoped to perform Baillie’s work in North America during their 1818—19 tour,” including her 1798 tragedy on hatred, De Monfort (25). A famously retiring person who surprisingly attended the theater very little—including the productions of her own plays—nevertheless Baillie heartily entered into dialogue with other writers, especially female play wrights of the first third of the nineteenth century. This group is larger than one might expect: Mary Berry, Barbarina Dacre, Elizabeth Fletcher, Catherine Gore, Felicia Hemans, Margaret Holford, Frances (“Fanny”) Anne Kemble, and Barbarina Wilmot. Ever a supporter of and advocate for other women novelists, poets, and essayists as well, Baillie penned letters to Susan Ferrier, Anna Jameson, Catharine Maria Sedgwick, and Rose Lawrence. Although Baillie declared to John Richardson in 1827 that she was “no reader at all, and could pass my life without books nearly as well as any countrywoman on the moors of Drumclog” (122), this self-assessment is not borne out by the letters. In fact, it is clear that if Baillie were going to make an evaluation of a friend’s or acquaintance’s work, her analysis would arise only after she had engaged the work with seriousness—and, in a num ber of cases, had read it several times. For instance, to Marry Berry she writes in 1828: “I have read your ‘View of the Social Life, &c,’ twice, and it has lost nothing, but rather gained, on the...