Ankle Fusion Research Articles

Arthroscopic ankle fusion in haemophilic ankle arthropathy: A report of four cases and narrative literature review

Arthroscopic ankle fusion in haemophilic ankle arthropathy: A report of four cases and narrative literature review

One-Stage Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis for Severe Septic Destruction of the Ankle Joint Using a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study.

Severe septic destruction of the ankle joint poses a therapeutic challenge but lacks a consensus optimal treatment. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is considered as a valuable salvage procedure, but the literature remains scarce. Conventional treatment approaches, including 2-stage procedures, have been associated with prolonged recovery times and varying success rates. Many authors prefer classical external fixation in these scenarios, citing concerns that internal implants might pose a risk for recurrent infection. To date, no study has investigated the outcomes of 1-stage surgery using a retrograde intramedullary (IM) nail. The main purpose was to assess the rate of recurrent infection at 2 years following 1-stage TTCA using a retrograde IM nail in severe septic destruction of the ankle joint. Fusion rates and functional outcomes were evaluated as secondary purposes. The clinical and radiologic data of patients who underwent 1-stage TTCA with retrograde IM nail following severe septic destruction of the ankle joint with a minimal follow-up of 2 years were retrospectively analyzed. Reinfection rate, fusion rate, functional outcomes, and complications were evaluated. A total of 25 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 42 months (24-92 months). The mean age was 55 ± 18 years old. At the last follow-up, reinfection occurred in 6 patients (24%) and fusion was obtained in 19 patients (83%). Eight patients (32%) required revision surgery. The mean postoperative modified American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey physical and mental component summary scores were respectively 53 ± 19.5, 35.5 ± 11.4, and 46.7 ± 13.5 points. One-stage TTCA with retrograde IM nail appears to be an acceptable alternative in severe septic destruction of the ankle joint, with a high eradication rate of infection and ankle fusion.

Clinical study of Cross-Union surgery for treatment of pseudarthrosis of tibia with neurofibromatosis type 1 in children

To evaluate the effectiveness of Cross-Union surgery for the treatment of pseudarthrosis of the tibia (PT) with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). The clinical data of 8 children of PT with NF1 who met the selection criteria between January 2018 and December 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 5 boys and 3 girls, and the operative age ranged from 1.8 to 13.3 years with a median age of 3.5 years. According to Paley classification, there were 2 cases of type 2a, 2 cases of type 3, 2 cases of type 4a, and 2 cases of type 4c. There were 5 cases of first operation and 3 cases of re-fracture after previous operation. Six cases had leg length discrepancy before operation, and 2 of them had shortening over 2.0 cm. Except for 1 case of ankle fusion, the other 7 cases had ankle valgus. Preoperative coronal/sagittal angulation was recorded. Postoperative pseudarthrosis healing and refracture were observed. Leg length discrepancy and tibiotalar angle were measured and recorded before operation and at last follow-up. Inan imaging evaluation criteria was used to evaluate the imaging effect. All patients were followed up 12-37 months (mean, 23.5 months). One pseudarthrosis failed to heal at 12 months after operation and healed at 3 months after reoperation, while the other pseudarthrosis healed with a healing rate of 87.5% and a healing time of 4-8 months (mean, 5.3 months). No refracture occurred during the follow-up. At last follow-up, there were 2 new cases with leg length discrepancy, which were 0.7 cm and 1.3 cm, respectively. In 2 cases with the leg length discrepancy more than 2.0 cm before operation, the improvement was from 4.1 cm and 12.6 cm to 2.1 cm and 9.0 cm, respectively. There was no significant difference in leg length discrepancy between pre- and post-operation in 8 cases ( P>0.05). At last follow-up, 6 patients still had ankle valgus, and there was no significant difference in the tibiotalar angle between pre- and post-operation ( P>0.05); the tibial coronal/sagittal angulation significantly improved when compared with that before operation ( P<0.05). According to Inan imaging evaluation criteria, 1 case was good, 6 cases were fair, and 1 case was poor. Cross-Union surgery is an effective method for the treatment of PT with NF1 in children, can achieve good bone healing results with a low risk of re-fracture. The surgery may not have significant effects on leg length discrepancy and ankle valgus, and further treatment may be required.

Distal Tibial Dome Osteotomy With Ilizarov Fixation in Correction of Ankle Deformity Resulting From Malunited Ankle Fusion

Background: Distal tibial osteotomy is used in the treatment of ankle deformities. Many methods of fixation of this osteotomy were described, including plates, pins, and ilizarov. Dome osteotomy is a cylindrical osteotomy with no bone loss, with the axis of bone is rotated around the center of the circle. We conducted a case series of treatment of ankle deformity due to malunited ankle fusion with distal tibial dome osteotomy. Methods: Eight patients with a history of poliomyelitis with ankle deformity due to a malunited ankle fusion underwent distal tibial dome osteotomy with ilizarov fixation for deformity correction. Postoperative follow up was done up to 12 months postoperatively. We intended to follow up the union of the osteotomy, the axis of the limb, the external clinical appearance, and patient satisfaction. Results: Deformity correction was achieved in all patients regarding the clinical alignment, with no apparent clinical residual deformity in coronal, sagittal plane, or rotational deformity, the limb was cosmetically straight with a plantigrade foot satisfactory to the patients with improving quality of gait. The osteotomy fully united in all patients in a period of 8 to 11 weeks with an average of 9.3 weeks, after which frame was removed. No patient had nonunion or delayed union of the osteotomy. Three patients had pin tract infection during the period of the fixator which was treated by local dressings and antibiotics. Conclusion: Distal tibial focal dome osteotomy fixed by ilizarov is an effective treatment option in malunited ankle fusion deformities.

Outcomes of One-Stage Arthroscopic Ankle and Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis with External Fixation for Septic Ankle and Hindfoot Arthritis: A Case-Series Study.

The occurrence of infection in the ankle and hindfoot presents a formidable surgical challenge. Currently, there is a lack of consensus regarding its treatment strategies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of one-stage arthroscopic ankle and tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with external fixation in the treatment of septic ankle and hindfoot arthritis. A retrospective consecutive case-series study was conducted involving six patients diagnosed with acute or chronic septic ankle or hindfoot arthritis, who underwent operative intervention entailing thorough debridement, arthroscopically assisted one-stage ankle or TTC fusion, and external fixation. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were determined preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Demographic and clinical data, inclusive of perioperative and postoperative complications, were recorded. Comparisons of AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS pain score between preoperative measures and those at the final follow-up were conducted using paired t-tests or paired Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. The study cohort comprised two males and four females, with a mean age of 48.7 years (range, 26-75) at the time of surgical intervention. At the final follow-up (mean, 26.5 months; range, 16-48), the AOFAS scores exhibited a significant improvement, ascending from an initial mean of 38.8 (range, 12-57) to 80.0 (range, 54-92) (p = 0.007). VAS scores indicated a substantial reduction in pain, decreasing from 6.5 (range, 4-9) to 0 (range, 0-5) (p = 0.046). All patients had achieved osseous consolidation, with a hindfoot infection control rate of 100%. One-stage arthroscopic ankle and TTC arthrodesis with external fixation is as an effective therapeutic choice for septic ankle or hindfoot arthritis. This approach yields favorable outcomes characterized by effective infection control, favorable osseous consolidation, and significant functional restoration of the affected limb.

A biomechanical study comparing the compression force and osseous area of contact of two screws fixation techniques used in ankle joint arthrodesis model

IntroductionArthrodesis of a (diseased) ankle joint is usually performed to achieve pain relief and stability. One basic principle of arthrodesis techniques includes rigid fixation of the surfaces until union. It seems plausible that stable anchoring and homogeneous pressure distribution should be advantageous, however, it has not been investigated yet. The aim is to achieve uniform compression, as this is expected to produce favorable results for the bony fusion of the intended arthrodesis. Numerous implants with different biomechanical concepts can be used for ankle fusion. In this study, headless compression screws (HCS, DePuy Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland) were compared biomechanically to an alternative fixation System, the IOFix device (Extremity Medical, Parsippany, NJ, USA) in regard to the distribution of the compression force (area of contact) and peak compression in a sawbone arthrodesis-model (Sawbones® Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA, USA).This study aims to quantify the area of contact between the bone interface that can be obtained using headless compression screws compared to the IOFix. In current literature, it is assumed, that a large contact surface with sufficient pressure between the bones brings good clinical results. However, there are no clinical or biomechanical studies, that describe the optimal compression pressure for an arthrodesis.Material and methodsTwo standardized sawbone blocks were placed above each other in a custom-made jig. IOFix and headless compression screws were inserted pairwise parallel to each other using a template for a uniform drilling pattern. All screws were inserted with a predefined torque of 0.5 Nm. Pressure transducers positioned between the two sawbone blocks were compressed for the measurement of peak compression force, compression distribution, and area of contact.ResultsWith the IOFix, the compression force was distributed over significantly larger areas compared to the contact area of the HCS screws, resulting in a more homogenous contact area over the entire arthrodesis surface. Maximum compression force showed no significant difference.ConclusionThe IOFix system distributes the compression pressure over a much larger area, resulting in more evenly spread compression at the surface. Clinical studies must show whether this leads to a lower pseudarthrosis rate.

Comparison of postoperative gait parameters after total ankle arthroplasty and ankle fusion: A systematic review.

Ankle pathology, such as severe arthritis, often necessitates surgical intervention to restore mobility and alleviate pain. Two commonly performed procedures for end-stage ankle disease are ankle fusion (AF) and total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). This review aims to compare the impact of AF and TAA on postoperative gait parameters. An extensive search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases was conducted with the use of the keywords ("ankle arthrodesis" OR "ankle fusion") AND ("ankle replacement" OR "ankle arthroplasty") AND "gait." Clinical studies in terms of postoperative gait parameters were included in this review. At least one of the following gait parameters, included in gait analysis, should be researched: spatiotemporal variables and joint kinematics and kinetics. An initial search revealed 221 studies. After the removal of duplicates and screening of titles,10 studies (7 prospective and 3 retrospective case series) were included for qualitative analysis. In the majority of studies, there is no significant difference in spatiotemporal parameters, such as walking speed, cadence, stance duration, step length, and stride length among AF and TAA patients. Postoperative sagittal ankle ROM, mainly maximum ankle dorsiflexion angle is significantly higher in TAA patients, while results concerning hip and knee ROM are variable. The comparison of AF and TAA in terms of postoperative gait parameters has shown variable results. In the majority of studies, there is no significant difference in spatiotemporal and kinetic parameters among AF and TAA patients. Further high-quality prospective studies are needed to fully elucidate the comparison of postoperative gait parameters.

Evaluation of arthroscopic ankle fusion for diabetic ankle fractures

Background Ankle fractures are a very common orthopedic trauma. One in eight patients undergoing ankle fixation is diabetic. Most of these patients also have additional comorbidities including peripheral arterial disease and diabetic neuropathy. Therefore, on one hand surgical intervention can pose challenges for wound healing and risk of infection, but non-operative management increases the risk for loss of reduction and therefore stresses the condition of the surrounding soft tissue. The aim of this work was to observe the radiological and functional outcome of arthroscopic ankle fusion in diabetic ankle fractures. Methods This prospective study was carried out on 20 patients, both sexes, with clinical criteria of displaced ankle fractures in diabetics, adults, closed ankle fractures, isolated trauma, diabetic patients with neuropathy and Adelaide Fracture in the Diabetic Ankle score more than or equal 5. Results Fourteen cases had solid bony union at a mean of 27.2 weeks while six cases had stable ankles with stiff fibrous nonunion at the end of the follow up period. Two of which had a breakage of distal locking screws. However, stiff fibrous nonunion of tibio-talar joint with the foot in a stable plantigrade position was considered satisfactory and no further intervention was advised. Our limb salvage rate was 100%. No below knee amputation was done. Conclusions Ankle fractures in diabetic patients are increasingly frequently encountered in comorbid patients with suboptimal overlying soft tissue integrity. Arthroscopic assisted ankle fusion can be considered a valid primary definitive treatment option to help reduce the potential perioperative soft tissue insult and associated complications. Utilizing an arthroscopic-assisted approach to this procedure is of added benefit in allowing for articular preparation and thereby reducing the risk of non-union while also minimizing additional extensive soft tissue insult in patients with underlying soft tissue compromise.

WHAT HAPPENS AFTER FAILED TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY?

AimsRetrospective review of a consecutive series of 1,168 total ankle replacements (TAR) performed at Wrightington, to analyse modes of failure and clinical outcomes following TAR failure.MethodsAll patients undergoing TAR between November 1993 – June 2019 were collated (4–25 year follow-up; mean 13.7 years). 6 implants were used (300 STAR, 100 Buechal Pappas, 509 Mobility, 118 Zenith, 41 Salto and 100 Infinity). 5 surgeons, all trained in TAR, performed the surgery. Modes of failure were collated and clinical and radiological outcomes recorded for the revisional surgery following failure of the TAR.Results156 (13.4%) TARs failed (47STAR 15.6%, 16BP 16%, 77Mobility 15.1%, 6Salto 14.6%, 10Zenith 8.5% and 0Infinity 0%). Mean time to failure 5.8 years (0.1- 21.4 years). The 4 most common modes of failure were 44.9% aseptic loosening, 11.5% gutter pain, 10.9% infection and 10.3% recurrent edge loading. 50 underwent conversion to tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion with nail with 9 (18%) failing to fuse. 31 underwent revision TAR with 2 (6.5%) subsequently failed. 22 underwent ankle fusion with 10 (45%) failing to fuse. 21 underwent polyethylene exchange of which 8 (38%) had further poly failure. 20 (12.8%) were managed conservatively, 2 (1.3%) required below knee amputation and 6 were listed but lost to follow-up. 81 of the 1168 (7%) consecutive cohort were lost to follow-up.Conclusions13.4% of the TAR cohort have failed at average follow-up 13.7 years. There was no difference in failure modes across the implant designs. Whilst the fixed bearing has the shortest follow-up, it may be performing better as there have been no failures so far. Prior to October 2016, most revisions were to fusion (TTC 18% failure rate, ankle 45% failure rate), whereas post 2016, 57% patients elected for revision TAR (6.5% failure).

LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP, REOPERATIONS, AND PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES FOLLOWING REVISION SURGERY FOR FAILED TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTIES

IntroductionPrimary ankle arthroplasty (TAR) is increasingly used to treat end-stage ankle arthritis. Reported revision rates of TAR vary from 8.5% to 11.1% at 9 years. Revision surgery remains technically challenging with options ranging from simple joint debridement to tibio-talar-calcaneal fusion. The efficacy of these procedures remains unclear and there is no consensus on optimal revision options.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients undergoing surgery for a failed primary TAR at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (2004–2021). TAR failure was determined by clinical assessment, serial radiographs and CT scans. Primary outcome measures included type and time of index surgery post TAR. Secondary outcomes included frequency of re-operations, post-operative complications, patient reported outcomes and union rate (for revision arthrodesis procedures).Results70 failed TARs in 69 patients (35M:34F, mean 65.7 years, s.d.=11.6) underwent re-operation a mean of 6.24 years (range 1–30) post primary. In total, 107 operations were performed including revision fusion (n=50), revision arthroplasty (n=14), bearing exchange (n=9) and joint clearance (n=9). The overall revision fusion union rate was 73.5% over a mean of 12.5 months (s.d.=7.6). 16/23 (69.6%) Tibio-Talo-Calcaneal and 9/12 (75%) ankle fusions (previous subtalar/triple fusion) using a hindfoot nail united over a mean 11.4 months (s.d.=6.0) and 15 months (s.d.=9.48) respectively. Only 64% of ankle fusions using screws alone united (mean=10.6 months, s.d.=8.14). The average post-operative MOXFQ score was 28.3 (s.d.=19.3). 73% said the operation improved their function and would recommend it to a friend/family member.ConclusionDespite low post-operative MOXFQ scores, over 70% of patients were satisfied with re-operation for a failed TAR. Over 26% of all TAR revision fusions fail to unite with the highest non-union rates observed post ankle arthrodesis with screws alone (36.4%).

INVERTED AND EVERTED SLOPE WALKING LEADS TO INCREASED KNEE COMPENSATION IN ANKLE FUSION COMPARED TO TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY

Ankle fusion (AF), a durable intervention for ankle arthritis, has been the management of choice but restricts mobility. Recently, total ankle replacement (TAR) has been offered to patients looking to maintain mobility. The aim was to compare the biomechanics of AF and TAR while walking on inverted and everted slopes which create a greater demand for complex foot mobility than level walking. A ten-camera motion detection setup captured trials as patients walked in both directions over a 5⁰ lateral slope with embedded force plates. Moments (Nm/Kg) across the knee and ankle were exported from Visual 3D in the sagittal and frontal plane, and data were reported as means with 95% confidence intervals. 15 patients were recruited (6 TAR, 9 AF). The median age, follow-up and BMI was 67 years, 4 years and 35.8 kg/m² in AF, and 73 years, 7 years and 28.1 kg/m² in TAR, respectively. During inverted slope walking (4 TAR, 7 AF), abduction moments across (i) the knee: TAR 0.38 (0.37–0.39) vs AF 0.37 (0.27–0.52) and (ii) the ankle: TAR 0.20 (0.13–0.27) vs AF 0.25 (0.18–0.32), and extension moments across (i) the knee: TAR 0.68 (0.38–0.97) vs AF 0.85 (0.69–1.01) and (ii) the ankle: TAR 1.46 (1.30–1.62) vs AF 1.30 (1.08–1.52). During everted walking (5 TAR, 7 AF), abduction moments across (i) the knee: TAR 0.41 (0.30–0.52) vs AF 0.46 (0.27–0.66) and (ii) the ankle: TAR 0.24 (0.11–0.38) vs AF 0.26 (0.18–0.33), and extension moments across (i) the knee: TAR 0.76 (0.54–0.99) vs AF 0.93 (0.72–1.14) and (ii) the ankle: TAR 1.39 (1.19–1.59) vs AF 1.26 (1.04–1.48). There were no differences in abduction moments during inverted or everted slope walking. However, patients with AF had increased extension moments across the knee, particularly on inverted slopes, suggesting that AF creates a greater demand for knee compensation than TAR.

FACTORS AFFECTING OUTCOMES OF ARTHROSCOPIC ANKLE FUSION: PRE-EXISTING TRIPLE FUSION AND THE RISK TO NONUNION

BackgroundOpen or arthroscopic ankle fusion (AAF) is a successful operative treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis. Evidence suggest that AAFs have better outcomes. In addition to the operative technique other patient-factors can influence outcomes. The most significant complication of ankle fusion is a non-union. To better understand the risk factors related to this we undertook a retrospective investigation of primary AAFs.MethodsWe reviewed all AAFs conducted at our institution over a 10-year period. Patients excluded if they had simultaneous fusion of neighbouring joints or were lost to follow-up. The primary outcome variable was radiographic union. Other operative complications were analysed as secondary outcomes. Two hundred and eighty-four eligible AAFs in 271 patients were performed over the study period.ResultsThe overall non-union rate was 7.7 %. Univariate logistic regression analysis found that smoking (6.2% non-union in non-smokers vs 24% in smokers) and prior triple fusion (5.5% non-union in the absence of prior triple fusion vs 70% in the presence of a prior triple fusion) were independent risk factors for non-union. Multivariate analysis showed that only prior triple fusion was predictive (OR 40.0 [9.4,170.3], p &lt; 0.0001). Increasing age, obesity (BMI &gt;30), surgical grade (trainee vs consultant), diabetes or the degree of weightbearing status post-operatively were not significant risk factors of non-union. The leading cause of reoperation was the removal of metal (18%). There were 5 superficial (1.8%) and 4 deep (1.4%) infections. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a 75% ‘survivorship’ of the subtalar joint at 10 years following an arthroscopic ankle fusion.ConclusionThis is the largest case series of AAFs in the literature and the first to demonstrate that patients who had an AAF performed after a previous triple fusion have unacceptably high non-union rates and may benefit from other surgical options. This study data could also useful for patient consenting purposes.

Medical Malpractice Litigation Following Hindfoot Arthrodesis

Given high patient expectations in the setting of complex surgeries, orthopedic surgeons are at risk of being subject to malpractice claims which can impose significant economic and psychological burden. This study investigates malpractice claims against orthopedic surgeons and podiatrists performing hindfoot arthrodesis and determine factors associated with plaintiff verdicts and settlements using the Westlaw legal database. The database was queried for all cases involving hindfoot arthrodesis using the terms “malpractice” and either “ankle fusion,” “arthrodesis,” “subtalar fusion,” “tibiotalar fusion,” “tibiotalocalcaneal fusion,” “TTC fusion,” or “tibiofibular fusion” from 1987 to 2023. Data regarding patient demographics, causes cited for litigation, case outcomes, and indemnity settlements were collected. Cases were excluded if the defendant was not an orthopedic surgeon or a podiatrist, the procedure involved was not a hindfoot arthrodesis, or if the patient was a minor. Forty-five cases of hindfoot arthrodesis met the inclusion criteria. The mean plaintiff age was 51.5 ± 13.8 years with 51.1% male. Thirty-three cases (73%) were in favor of the defendant, with an average inflation-adjusted payout of $853,863 (±456,179). The most alleged category of negligence was procedural/intraoperative error (75%) followed by postsurgical error (38%) and failure to inform (31%). The most common specific damages included functional/ROM limitation (49%), need for additional surgery (47%), continuing/worsened pain (27%), and nonunion/malunion (29%). Given the frequency of hindfoot arthrodesis performed, this study highlights the importance of effective communication with patients concerning potential postoperative complications, prognosis of their injury, and risks and benefits associated with each treatment modality.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of ankle joint preserving surgical reconstruction for talar neck non-unions–A series of 8 cases

BackgroundTalar neck non-unions result in significant hindfoot deformity and morbidity and are infrequently reported in the literature. The optimal surgical management for this condition is evolving, with various authors reporting the results of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with bone grafting (BG), ankle fusion and modified Blair fusion. We performed this study to report the clinical and radiological outcomes of a cohort of talar neck non-unions managed by ankle joint preserving reconstruction. MethodsThis was an ambispective study which included 8 patients (7 male and 1 female) with talar neck non-unions. All patients underwent ORIF+BG through dual approaches. Additional medial malleolar osteotomy was done in 2 cases, and calcaneofibular split approach to the subtalar joint in 3. Adjunct subtalar fusion was done in 5 cases. Clinical and radiological evaluation was performed pre- and post-operatively. Functional outcomes were assessed by the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ). ResultsThe mean age of patients 32.3 ± 13.1 years. The mean surgical delay was 4.1 ± 1.7 months. As per Zwipp and Rammelt classification of post-traumatic talar deformities, 5 cases were classified as Type 3, 2 were Type 4, and 1 was Type 1. Union was achieved in 7 cases at a mean of 3.4 ± 1.3 months. One case had progressive collapse, which was managed by pantalar arthrodesis. All 3 cases where subtalar fusion was not performed primarily demonstrated subtalar arthrosis, but none required a secondary subtalar fusion. The MOxFQ score from 61.1 ± 10.1 to 41 ± 14.1 postoperatively (P = 0.005). The mean follow-up was 14.6 ± 6.8 months. ConclusionORIF+BG of the talar neck, with or without subtalar fusion has the potential to achieve solid union, correct the hindfoot deformity and improve functional outcomes. However, larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of this procedure.

Painful Peroneal Tendon Subluxation in a Patient With a Prior Ankle Fusion.

This case report describes a patient who underwent an ankle fusion using a lateral approach and fibular-onlay strut 14 years ago. She presented with increasing lateral ankle pain and giving way. Despite bracing and steroid injections, she had continued symptoms and surgery for hardware removal was recommended. While under anesthesia, she was found to have subluxation of her peroneal tendons. Operative findings included impingement of the peroneal brevis on the screw head from her fibular-onlay strut and a peroneal tendon tear. Hardware removal, a peroneal tenodesis, and reconstruction of the peroneal retinaculum were performed with a good clinical result.Level of Evidence: V (case report).

ISOLATED ANKLE FUSION FOR FAILED TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY USING A SPINE CAGE AND ANTERIOR PLATING CONSTRUCT

BackgroundTotal ankle replacements (TARs) are becoming increasingly more common in the treatment of end stage ankle arthritis. As a consequence, more patients are presenting with the complex situation of the failing TAR. The aim of this study was to present our case series of isolated ankle fusions post failed TAR using a spinal cage construct and anterior plating technique.MethodsA retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed for 6 patients that had isolated ankle fusions performed for failed TAR. These were performed by a single surgeon (IW) between March 2012 and October 2014. The procedure was performed using a Spinal Cage construct and grafting in the joint defect and anterior plating. Our primary outcome measure was clinical and radiographic union at 1 year. Union was defined as clinical union and no evidence of radiographic hardware loosening or persistent joint lucent line at 1 year.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 37.3 months (SD 13.2). Union was achieved in 5 of the 6 patients (83%). One patient had a non-union that required revision fusion incorporating the talonavicular joint that successfully went on to unite across both joints. Another patient had radiographic features of non-union but was clinically united and asymptomatic and one required revision surgery for a bulky symptomatic lateral malleolus with fused ankle joint.ConclusionThe failing TAR presents a complex clinical situation. After removal of the implant there is often a large defect which if compressed leads to a leg length discrepancy and if filled with augment can increase the risk of non-union. Multiple methods have been described for revision, with many advocating fusion of both the ankle joint and subtalar joint. We present our case series using a spinal cage and anterior plating that allows preservation of the subtalar joint and a high rate of union.

Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty Using a Novel Modular Fixed-Bearing Revision Ankle System.

Large bone defects such as those encountered after failed total ankle replacement have previously been a relative contraindication to revision ankle replacement due to inadequate bone stock. We describe our experience and patient reported outcomes with a modular ankle replacement system with tibial and talar augments. This is a retrospective case series analysis of patients who underwent a total ankle replacement using the INVISION system across 2 centers between 2016 and 2022. Patients completed the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), and EQ-5D pre-operatively and then post-operatively at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years. Medical records were reviewed for complications and re-operations. X-rays were reviewed for lucencies and alignment. A total of 17 patients were included in the study; 14 men and 3 women with an average age at the time of surgery of 67.9 years (range 56-80 years). The average follow-up post-operatively was 40.5 months (range 7-78) at the time of this study. The indication for surgery was revision of failed total ankle replacement (TAR) in 16 and revision of failed ankle fusion in 1. An augmented tibia was used in 13, an augmented talus in 13, and both augmented tibia and talus in 9 cases. There were no early surgical complications. One patient required debridement and implant retention for late deep infection. No implants have been revised. The average MOXFQ score improved by 19.3 points at most recent follow-up. The average AOS score improved by 25.2 points. The early results of a modular augmented ankle arthroplasty system have shown satisfactory patient outcomes with a low complication and re-operation rate and present another option for patients with larger bone defects. This is a small series, and a larger series with long-term follow-up would be beneficial. Level IV: Case series.

Dedicated locking plate reduces non-union risk in open ankle fusion in obese patients

IntroductionObesity is a growing public health concern. In ankle osteoarthritis, non-conservative treatment in advanced stages consists in ankle fusion, or else total ankle replacement, for which obesity is a relative contraindication. One of main complications of ankle fusion is non-union. Devascularization, obesity and fixation material are all factors involved in postoperative non-union, and have to be taken into account in surgical strategy for reliable results. The objective of this study was to compare the rate of ankle non-union in obese patients using quadruple screwing or a dedicated locking plate. The hypothesis was that the locking plate limits the risk of non-union in this population. MethodsAll patients were obese (BMI>30kg/m2) and presented ankle osteoarthritis with>10° intra-articular deformity. The approach and joint preparation were performed via an anteromedial approach. Group S was composed of 32 patients, operated on by quadruple screwing; group P comprised 10 patients operated on using a dedicated locking plate. The main endpoint was a significant difference in the rate of non-union between the 2 groups. The secondary endpoint was improvement in pre- and 6-month postoperative AOFAS score. ResultsGroup S presented 31% non-union (10/32) and group P 0% (0/10) (p<0.05). Postoperative AOFAS score was significantly higher in group P: 67.8±10.4 [range, 40–92] vs. 83.1±8.0 [range, 64–92] (p<0.05). ConclusionThe dedicated anterior locking plate is a technique of choice for ankle fusion in obese patients with intra-articular deformity>10°, to limit the risk of non-union. Level of evidenceIV; retrospective study.

Application of three dimensional printed personalized guide plate assisted arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of ankle arthritis

Objective: To compare the efficacy of conventional open ankle fusion and three dimensional(3D) printed guide plate assisted arthroscopic ankle fusion. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on 256 patients with advanced traumatic ankle arthritis, who were admitted to the Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from May 2018 to February 2023 and underwent ankle fusion procedures. The study cohort comprised 119 males and 137 females, with an age of (59.6±9.5) years (range: 37 to 83 years). Among them, 175 cases underwent internal fixation with plates and screws (58 cases through the combined medial and lateral approach, and 117 cases through the simple lateral approach), 48 cases underwent internal fixation with screws through the anterior approach (conventional open group), and 33 cases underwent minimally invasive arthroscopic ankle fusion assisted by 3D printed guide plate (3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group). Propensity score matching was employed to achieve a 1∶1 match(caliper value=0.02) between the baseline characteristics of patients in the 3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group and the conventional open group. Perioperative and follow-up data between the two groups were compared using the t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed rank test,χ² test, or Fisher's exact probability method, as appropriate. Results: Matching was successfully achieved with 20 cases in both the 3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group and the conventional open group, and there were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (all P>0.05). The operation time in the 3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group was significantly longer than that in the conventional open group ((88.9±5.6) minutes vs. (77.9±11.7) minutes;t=-2.392, P=0.022), while the frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopies ((1.7±0.8) times vs. (5.2±1.2) times; t=10.604, P<0.01) and length of hospitalization ((5.5±0.9) days vs. (6.4±1.5) days;t=2.480, P=0.018) were significantly lower in the 3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group compared to the conventional open group. The fusion rate was 95.0% (19/20) in the 3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group and 85.0% (17/20) in the conventional open group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ²=1.111,P=0.605). The fusion time was (12.1±2.0) weeks in the conventional open group and (11.1±1.7) weeks in the 3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (t=1.607, P=0.116). At the final follow-up, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle hindfoot scale was (72.6±5.5)points in the 3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group and (70.5±5.8)points in the conventional open group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (t=-1.003, P=0.322). The VAS score of the 3D printed guide plate arthroscopy group was (M(IQR)) 1.50 (1.00) points, lower than that of the conventional open group by 3.00 (1.00) points, with statistically significant differences (Z=-3.937, P<0.01). The complication rate was significantly higher in the conventional open group (25.0%(5/20) vs. 5.0%(1/20), P=0.182). Conclusion: 3D printed guide plate assisted arthroscopic ankle fusion exhibited several advantages, including reduced frequency of fluoroscopies, alleviation of postoperative pain, and decreased complications and length of hospitalization.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of ankle arthrodesis options

Introduction Treatment methods for late stages of ankle osteoarthritis are varied, but the issue of assessing the long-term results of various fixation methods has not yet been studied, and this issue is of great importance in clinical practice.Purpose To compare the effectiveness of the fixation methods commonly used for ankle arthrodesis in patients with advanced ankle osteoarthritis.Materials and methods Eighty-two patients with advanced ankle osteoarthritis were treated with ankle fusion between 2019 and 2023 at three major medical institutions. All patients underwent 12-month follow-ups. The patients were divided into four groups depending on the method of surgical fixation of bone fragments.Results Most patients showed a significant improvement in the function and a decrease in pain intensity after the arthrodesis operation. The comparison of the effectiveness of various surgical fixation methods found that external apparatus screw fixation is characterized by lower blood loss and a relatively short duration of the operation. Plate and screw fixation resulted in higher AOFAS and VAS scores at 3 months postoperatively. However, by the 12th month after surgery, the differences in these two indicators were insignificant.Discussion Despite the various complications that occur in ankle arthrodesis, it remains effective for most patients. Among them, the Ilizarov apparatus is more suitable for patients with compromised conditions in the surgical area. Each method of surgical fixation has its own advantages and shortcomings, but the difference in long-term effectiveness is small. Conclusion Ankle arthrodesis is an effective treatment for advanced ankle osteoarthritis. The choice of surgical method is still subject to the principle of individual approach.