Management Of Ankle Fractures Research Articles

ELDERLY ANKLE FRACTURE MANAGEMENT: PUTTING THE EVIDENCE INTO PRACTICE

IntroductionFollowing publication of the Ankle Injury Management (AIM) trial in 2016 which compared the management of ankle fractures with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus closed contact casting (CCC), we looked at how the results of this study have been adopted into practice in a trauma unit in the United Kingdom.MethodsInstitutional approval granted to identify eligible patients from a trauma database. 143 patients over 60 years with an unstable ankle fracture between 2017 and 2019 (1 year following publication of the AIM trial) were included. Open fractures, and patients with insulin-dependent diabetes or peripheral vessel disease were excluded (as per AIM criteria). Radiographs were reviewed for malunion and non-union. Clinical notes were reviewed for adverse events. Minimum follow up was 24 months.ResultsOf the 143 patients, 42 patients (29.4%) received a moulded cast with a return to theatre rate of 21.4%, malunion rate of 30.1%, and infection or wound problem rate of 4.8%. When the exact phrase “close contact cast” was specified in 21 patients (14.7%), there was a 19.0% return to theatre rate, 28.6% malunion rate, and a 4.8% infection or wound problem rate. 101 patients (70.6%) had ORIF with a return to theatre rate of 10.9%, malunion rate of 5.0%, and infection or wound problem rate of 13.9%.DiscussionOur results show a high rate of complication with cast management of unstable ankle fractures in this older population. This was improved where CCC was specified, but remains higher even than those published in the AIM trial. Whilst there is certainly a role for CCC in carefully selected patients, we would advise caution in the widespread adoption of a close contact casting technique.

HINDFOOT ANKLE RECONSTRUCTION NAIL TRIAL (HARNT): POPULATION ANALYSIS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF COMPLEX ANKLE FRACTURES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

IntroductionThe management of open or unstable ankle and distal tibial fractures pose many challenges. In certain situations, hindfoot nailing (HFN) is indicated, however this depends on surgeon preference and regional variations exist. This study sought to establish the current management and outcomes of complex ankle fractures in the UK.MethodsA National collaborative study in affiliation with BOTA was conducted and data retrospectively collected between January 1st – June 30th 2019. Adult patients with open and closed complex ankle fractures (AO43/44) were included. Complex fractures included the following patient characteristics: diabetes ± neuropathy, rheumatoid arthritis, alcoholism, polytrauma and cognitive impairment. We obtained data on fixation choice and patient outcomes. Institutional approval was obtained by all centres, and statistical analysis was performed including propensity matching.ResultsFifty-six centres provided data for 1360 patients. The average age of the cohort was 53.9 years ±19 (SD) with a male/female ratio of 1:1.3. 920 patients were ASA 1/2, 440 were ASA 3/4; 316 had diabetes, and 275 were open fractures. Most fractures were AO44 (71.2%) and more commonly associated with diabetes (P<0.001), alcoholism (P<0.007), open (P<0.013), and advanced age (55.7 vs. 46.3). 1227 patients underwent primary-fixation (111 HFN), with the remainder treated with external-fixation (84 definitive). Of the 111 HFN, 35% underwent primary fusion. Wound complication and thromboembolic rates were greater in the HFN group compared to ORIF groups (P<0.003), being more evident in the HFN group with primary fusion even after propensity matching. However, 1081 patients were non-weightbearing post-op contrary to the BOAST guidance.ConclusionThis is the first National collaborative audit of complex ankle fractures. Hindfoot nails were used in 9% of patients and we observed more complications in this group when compared to other cohorts. Despite BOAST guidance, only 21% of patients undergoing operative management were instructed to fully weightbear post-operatively.

The outcomes of the management of complex distal tibia and ankle fractures in elderly with tibiotalocalcaneal nail in a minimum 12-month follow-up period.

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of the use of tibiotalocalcaneal nail for the treatment of complex distal tibia and ankle fractures in elderly people, in a major trauma centre. Elderly patients (age > 65) with distal tibia or ankle fractures that underwent stabilization with a tibiotalocalcaneal nail were eligible to participate. Exclusion criteria were patients that died or were lost to follow-up and cases in which the nail was used in a chronic setting, such as malunion and non-union. Main parameters evaluated were fracture union, complications and functional outcomes. The functional outcome was assessed using the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). The minimum follow-up was 12months. Thirty-two consecutive patients (12 males) with a mean age of 80.2years (range 66-98) met the inclusion criteria and formed the basis of this study. Fracture union was achieved in 93.8% of the cases at a mean time of 3.9months (range 2-8). Two patients developed surgical site infections and underwent reoperation before union. The overall complication rate was 25.1%, while the respective reintervention rate was 18.8%. In terms of functional outcomes, the mean OMAS score was 45, ranging from 20 to 70. Tibiotalocalcaneal nailing can be considered as an acceptable less invasive option with good functional outcomes for the treatment of complex distal tibia and ankle fractures in frail patients with problematic local soft tissues.

ANKLE FRACTURE FIXATION IN THE OVER 60'S: FIBULAR-PRO-TIBIA VERSUS HINDFOOT NAILING

IntroductionAnkle fractures in the elderly are an increasing problem with our aging population. Options for treatment include non-operative and operative with a range of techniques available. Failure of treatment can lead to significant complications, morbidity and poor function. We compared the outcomes of two operative techniques, intramedullary hindfoot nailing (IMN) and fibular-pro-tibia fixation (FPT). This is the largest analysis of these techniques and there are no comparative studies published.MethodWe retrospectively reviewed patients over the age of 60 with ankle fractures who were treated operatively between 2012 and 2017. We identified 1417 cases, including 27 patients treated with IMN and 41 treated with FPT. Age, sex, co-morbidities and injury pattern were collected. Primary outcome was re-operation rate. Secondary outcomes included other complications, length of stay and functional status.ResultsThe IMN group had a higher average co-morbidity score compared with the FPT group (estimated 10-year survival, 21% vs 53%, p=0.03). Re-operation rate was higher in the IMN group compared with FPT (12 v 1, p< 0.0001). There were more complications in the IMN group compared with the FPT group (23 v 11, p< 0.0001). Length of stay was longer in the IMN group (17 v 29 days, p=0.02). Mobility tended to return to baseline in the FPT patients but decreased in the IMN patients.ConclusionOutcomes were worse in the IMN group compared with the FPT group in terms of re-operation, complications and length of stay. However, the IMN group tended to have increased comorbidities and poorer soft tissues. We believe that both techniques have a role in the management of elderly ankle fractures, but patient selection is key. We suggest FPT should be the first-choice technique when soft tissues permit. We discuss the indications, risks and benefits of each method based on our experience and literature review.

Complications following surgical treatment of ankle fractures in the elderly: can they be avoided?

Background Following surgical treatment of ankle fractures, geriatric patients face high complication rates (CR) in literature. Commonly used diagnostic and treatment algorithms fail to consider requirements of ageing patients which increases the risk of postoperative complications. Objective Present study critically evaluated surgical management of ankle fractures in patients over 65 years old, with focus on identifying modifiable risk factors and effective comorbidity management strategies. Methods We conducted a retrospective single-center study on patients who underwent surgical treatment of an ankle fracture. Based on their age, participants were divided into non-geriatric patients (NGP<65y) and geriatric patients (GP≥65y). We analyzed overall CR and number of minor and major complications in relation to timing of surgery, biological sex, injury pattern, osteosynthesis, pre-existing medical conditions, and postoperative care. Results 402 patients were included. GP encountered significantly higher overall (p<0.001), minor (p<0.001) and major (p=0.003) complications. They presented more complex, displaced and open fractures. Predominant factor contributing to higher CR in NGP and markedly in GP was concomitant diseases, presenting a strong OR of 19,290 (p<0.001) and 17,022 (p<0.001). Delaying surgery and managing comorbidities preoperatively had a favorable impact. Conclusion We revealed a high significant correlation between pre-existing medical conditions and postoperative results. To ascertain viability of delayed surgery in facilitating additional diagnostics and treatment of comorbidities, further comparative trials with a larger cohort are imperative.

Arthroscopic management of pediatric ankle fractures: a systematic review.

Arthroscopic-assisted treatment of ankle fractures has proven useful in the adult population, but little evidence exists for the utilization of arthroscopic-assisted ankle fracture fixation in the pediatric population. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the management of pediatric ankle fractures using arthroscopy. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and MEDLINE from database inception to February 22nd, 2023. Inclusion criteria for this systematic review was pediatric population less than age 18, arthroscopic surgery management, and ankle fracture. A total of 19 articles (n=30 patients) out of 176 articles met final inclusion criteria with all articles consisting of case reports or case series. The average patient age was 13.8±1.6 years. Sixteen of the patients (53%) had arthroscopic surgery along with an adjunct surgery as indicated, whereas 14 patients (47%) had arthroscopic surgery with or without percutaneous fixation. A high majority of patients demonstrated full range-of-motion and large improvements in function. Arthroscopy is used with percutaneous fixation or in adjunct to open approaches for pediatric ankle fracture management with good results. More research is needed to determine the utility of arthroscopy in the management of pediatric ankle fractures.

Prediction of Short-Term Postoperative Complications Following Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Acute Ankle Fractures

Introduction/Purpose: Acute ankle fractures are a common injury and represent a significant financial burden to the healthcare system. Reimbursement following ankle fractures is complicated by bundled payments within the 90-day global period which do not account for unpredictable complications. Comorbidity indices, such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, are often correlated with complications; however, the positive predictive value of these metrics have not been investigated. As insurers continue to transition towards bundled reimbursements, greater attentiveness towards providing efficient care is paramount. The purpose of this investigation is to develop a machine learning (ML) model that is predictive of complications following operative management of acute ankle fractures. This study will also compare ML algorithms to legacy indices to assess the predictive value in predicting complications. Methods: The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried via Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) from 2015-2018 for open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) cases for ankle fractures, including ORIF of the medial malleolus, posterior malleolus, lateral malleolus, bimalleolar, trimalleolar, syndesmosis. Training and validation sets were created by randomly assigning 80% and 20% of the data set. Included variables were age, body mass index (BMI), operative time, smoking status, comorbidities, diagnosis, and preoperative hematocrit and albumin. Complications included any adverse event, transfusion, surgical site infection, return to the operating room, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, cerebrovascular accident, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction. Each ML algorithm was compared with one another and to a baseline model using American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. Model strength was evaluated by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of any adverse event. Results: We identified a total of 28,736 ORIF cases. Mean age and BMI were 32.2 ± 18.6 years, 30.8 ± 7.6 kg/m^2, respectively. The overall incidence of any medical complication was 3.4% (n=975) with surgical site infection (1.3%, n=386) and return to operating room (1.3%, n=367) being the most common. Percentage hematocrit, BMI, operative time, and age were of highest importance in outcome prediction. Logistic regression (AUC: 72%) and gradient boosting (AUC: 72%) ML algorithms outperformed ASA classification (AUC: 69%) for predicting any adverse event following ORIF of ankle fractures. Conclusion: Legacy comorbidity indices are simple metrics that can be easily constructed from patient demographic variables and past medical history. However, the predictive power is limited as they have shown a low positive predictive value for predicting complications. Machine learning algorithms can calculate patient-specific risk for postoperative complications which may adjust perioperative care and site of surgery. These models have the capability to optimize utilization of healthcare resources and minimize excessive expenditure by providing patient-specific care. Receiver Operating Curve-Area under the Curve Analysis for Adverse Events Following ORIF of Ankle Fractures

Consensus on managing open ankle fractures in the frail patient.

Ankle fractures are common injuries and the third most common fragility fracture. In all, 40% of ankle fractures in the frail are open and represent a complex clinical scenario, with morbidity and mortality rates similar to hip fracture patients. They have a higher risk of complications, such as wound infections, malunion, hospital-acquired infections, pressure sores, veno-thromboembolic events, and significant sarcopaenia from prolonged bed rest. A modified Delphi method was used and a group of experts with a vested interest in best practice were invited from the British Foot and Ankle Society (BOFAS), British Orthopaedic Association (BOA), Orthopaedic Trauma Society (OTS), British Association of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgeons (BAPRAS), British Geriatric Society (BGS), and the British Limb Reconstruction Society (BLRS). In the first stage, there were 36 respondents to the survey, with over 70% stating their unit treats more than 20 such cases per year. There was a 50:50 split regarding if the timing of surgery should be within 36 hours, as per the hip fracture guidelines, or 72 hours, as per the open fracture guidelines. Overall, 75% would attempt primary wound closure and 25% would utilize a local flap. There was no orthopaedic agreement on fixation, and 75% would permit weightbearing immediately. In the second stage, performed at the BLRS meeting, experts discussed the survey results and agreed upon a consensus for the management of open elderly ankle fractures. A mutually agreed consensus from the expert panel was reached to enable the best practice for the management of patients with frailty with an open ankle fracture: 1) all units managing lower limb fragility fractures should do so through a cohorted multidisciplinary pathway. This pathway should follow the standards laid down in the "care of the older or frail orthopaedic trauma patient" British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guideline. These patients have low bone density, and we should recommend full falls and bone health assessment; 2) all open lower limb fragility fractures should be treated in a single stage within 24 hours of injury if possible; 3) all patients with fragility fractures of the lower limb should be considered for mobilisation on the day following surgery; 4) all patients with lower limb open fragility fractures should be considered for tissue sparing, with judicious debridement as a default; 5) all patients with open lower limb fragility fractures should be managed by a consultant plastic surgeon with primary closure wherever possible; and 6) the method of fixation must allow for immediate unrestricted weightbearing.

Insights into optimal surgical fixation for posterior malleolar fractures.

The optimal management of posterior malleolar ankle fractures, a prevalent type of ankle trauma, is essential for improved prognosis. However, there remains a debate over the most effective surgical approach, particularly between screw and plate fixation methods. This study aims to investigate the differences in outcomes associated with these fixation techniques. We conducted a comprehensive review of clinical trials comparing anteroposterior (A-P) screws, posteroanterior (P-A) screws, and plate fixation. Two investigators validated the data sourced from multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science). Following PRISMA guidelines, we carried out a network meta-analysis (NMA) using visual analogue scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included range of motion limitations, radiological outcomes, and complication rates. The NMA encompassed 13 studies, consisting of four randomized trials and eight retrospective ones. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve-based ranking, the A-P screw was ranked highest for improvements in AOFAS and exhibited lowest in infection and peroneal nerve injury incidence. The P-A screws, on the other hand, excelled in terms of VAS score improvements. Conversely, posterior buttress plate fixation showed the least incidence of osteoarthritis grade progression, postoperative articular step-off ≥ 2 mm, nonunions, and loss of ankle dorsiflexion ≥ 5°, though it underperformed in most other clinical outcomes. The NMA suggests that open plating is more likely to provide better radiological outcomes, while screw fixation may have a greater potential for superior functional and pain results. Nevertheless, clinicians should still consider the fragment size and fracture pattern, weighing the advantages of rigid biomechanical fixation against the possibility of soft-tissue damage, to optimize treatment results.

Computed tomography changes diagnosis, management and surgical planning of ankle fractures.

To demonstrate how the use of adjunctive Computed Tomography (CT) can modify diagnosis, treatment options, and operative planning of ankle fractures in comparison with conventional radiographs (CR) in isolation. A total of 53 patients diagnosed with an ankle fracture between 2011 and 2016, were assessed with CT and CR. Evaluations of the fractures using CR in isolation and CR combined with CT were compared using different readers. Fractures were assessed in terms of type, displacement, size, associated injuries, treatment, patient position and surgical planning. The medial malleolus fractures characteristics (posteromedial fragment and anterior colliculus), the presence of posterior malleolus fracture and its characteristics (displacement, size, posteromedial or posterolateral segment) (ps < 0.042), syndesmosis injury (p < 0.001), and the absence of deltoid ligament lesion (p < 0.001), were more evident with the combination of CT and radiographs. There was an increase in operative indication (p = 0.007), prone positioning (p = 0.002), posterior malleolus surgical treatment (p < 0.001), posterolateral approach for the lateral malleolus (p = 0.003), and syndesmosis fixation (p = 0.020) with the association of CT and CR, among all groups of expertise, with a high interobserver reliability (> 0.75). The CR may fail to demonstrate subtle lesions, such as posterior malleolus fractures and syndesmotic injuries. The CT evaluation increases the diagnostic precision and improves the quality of information the surgeon receives, what might positively affect patient care. Retrospective Comparative Study.

Assessing the Quality and Clarity of YouTube Videos as an Informational Source for Ankle Fractures: A Study of the Turkish Population.

Background and objective The significance of YouTube as a prominent source of healthcare-related information cannot be overstated. Its influence on patient education is substantial. However, despite its popularity, there has been little research into the quality and comprehensibility of videos related to ankle fractures, a condition with increasing incidence rates, particularly in the context of Turkey. To address this gap in the literature and the growing reliance on digital platforms for health information during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, this study aims to assess the quality, clarity, and pedagogical value of YouTube videos on ankle fractures for the Turkish population. Methodology A comprehensive examination of 150 YouTube videos concerning ankle fractures, employing exacting inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify 52 videos for in-depth analysis was undertaken. The investigation entailed an assessment of content quality, presentation style, and user interaction, utilizing the criteria established by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), as well as a novel measurement known as the Ankle Fracture Content Score (AFCS). A statistical analysis was executed to gauge the educational value and dependability of the information presented. Results The majority of ankle fracture management videos were found to be uploaded by medical professionals, covering various aspects such as rehabilitation and patient testimonials. However, the overall educational quality was suboptimal, with patient-shared videos lacking in depth and accuracy. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences in content quality across different uploader categories, except for notably lower educational quality in videos shared by patients. Conclusions The findings underscore a significant need for healthcare professionals and academic institutions in Turkey to produce and share high-quality, reliable, and comprehensible videos on ankle fractures. Leveraging YouTube's extensive reach can significantly improve health literacy among the Turkish public, ensuring access to accurate and trustworthy health information.

Predictors of Episode-of-Care Costs for Ankle Fractures

Ankle fractures are one of the most resource-consuming traumatic orthopedic injuries. Few studies have successfully evaluated the episode-of-care costs (EOCC) of common traumatic orthopedic injuries. The objective of this study was to determine the EOCC associated with the surgical management of ankle fractures. A retrospective cohort study of 105 consecutive patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation of an isolated ankle fracture at a Canadian Level-1 trauma center was conducted. Episode-of-care costs were generated using an activity-based costing framework. The median global episode-of-care cost for ankle fracture surgeries performed at the studied institution was $3,487 CAD [IQR 880] ($2,685 USD [IQR 616]). Patients aged 60 to 90 years had a significantly higher median EOCC than younger patients (p = .01). Supination-adduction injuries had a significantly higher median EOCC than other injury patterns (p = .01). The median EOCC for patients who underwent surgery within 10 days of their injury ($3,347 CAD [582], $2,577 USD [448]) was significantly lower than the cost for patients who had their surgery delayed 10 days or more after the injury ($3,634 CAD [776], $2,798 USD [598]) (p = .03). Patient sex, anesthesia type, ASA score and surgeon's fellowship training did not affect the EOCC. This study provides valuable data on predictors of EOCC in the surgical management of ankle fractures. Delaying simple ankle fracture cases due to operating time constraints can increase the total cost and burden of these fractures on the healthcare system. In addition, this study provides a framework for future episode-of-care cost analysis studies in orthopedic surgery.

Foot &amp; Ankle

The February 2024 Foot &amp; Ankle Roundup360 looks at: Survival of revision ankle arthroplasty; Tibiotalocalcaneal nail for the management of open ankle fractures in the elderly patient; Accuracy of a patient-specific total ankle arthroplasty instrumentation; Fusion after failed primary ankle arthroplasty: can it work?; Treatment options for osteochondral lesions of the talus; Managing hair tourniquet syndrome of toe: a rare emergency; Ultrasound-guided collagenase therapy for recurrent plantar fibromatosis: a promising line of therapy?.

Comparison of Operative vs Non-operative Management of Ankle Fractures in Diabetic Patients: Prospective Randomized Trial

This study investigates the outcomes and complications associated with the management of ankle fractures in diabetic patients. A total of 44 diabetic patients with ankle fractures were enrolled, and they were randomly assigned to either conservative or operative treatment groups. The study evaluated demographic characteristics, diagnosis, complications, functional outcomes, and correlation with HbA1c and ankle brachial index. The results revealed a 29.5% complication rate among the patients, including superficial infections, Charcot neuroarthropathy, arthritic changes, loss of reduction leading to ankle fusion, and stiffness. Functional outcome scores (AOFAS and SF36) did not significantly differ between the conservative and operative groups. Correlation analysis showed a significant negative relationship between HbA1c levels and functional scores in the conservative group. Ankle brachial index demonstrated a negative correlation with the SF36 score in the conservative treatment group. The study emphasizes the importance of diabetic control and vascular assessment in guiding treatment decisions for diabetic ankle fractures.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown on Adult Foot and Ankle Fractures Presenting to the Largest Trust in the United Kingdom.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic induced unprecedented changes in medical practices, prompting a reassessment of their impact on adult foot and ankle fractures within the National Health Service (NHS). This study employs a retrospective observational approach, leveraging the Pathpoint™ eTrauma platform for a comprehensive analysis of prospectively collected data. Methods Data encompassing weekly fracture incidence, weekly surgical procedures, patient demographics, and mean wait time from injury presentation to surgery were systematically evaluated. The study population included all adults (18+) admitted during five distinct periods: pre-pandemic, national lockdown 1, post-lockdown, national lockdown 2, and national lockdown 3. Results An analysis of 434 foot and ankle fractures revealed that national lockdown 1 exhibited the lowest fracture incidence (4.97 per week) and surgeries performed (4.77 per week), reflecting a notable reduction in trauma cases and elective procedures. Conversely, post-lockdown displayed the highest fracture incidence (7.46 per week) and surgeries performed (6.31 per week), suggesting a resurgence in both trauma and elective surgical activities. The pre-pandemic cohort, characterized by the highest mean age (51.98 years) and mean wait time (8.74 days), served as a temporal baseline. Conclusion While the incidence of fractures decreased during all three national lockdowns compared to pre-pandemic or post-lockdown periods, a gradual increase was observed in subsequent lockdowns. Notably, mean wait times showed a significant reduction, reaching the lowest point (5.79 days) during national lockdown 3. These findings underscore the complex interplay between pandemic-related disruptions, evolving guidelines, and adaptive measures within the healthcare system, influencing the dynamics of foot and ankle fracture management.

Safety of the modified posteromedial approach in complex ankle fractures: Comparative analysis versus posterolateral access

IntroductionThe aim of the study was to evaluate the safety of the modified posteromedial approach (MfPM) in the surgical management of complex ankle fractures in terms of local complications. MethodsRetrospective multicenter review of a series of malleolar fractures surgically treated by posterior ankle approaches between 2016 and 2022. Two approaches were used. In the MfPM group patients were placed in a prone position and the incision was made 1 cm medially to the Achilles tendon. In the posterolateral access (PL) group patients were placed in a prone or lateral decubitus position and the incision was made between the lateral malleolus and the Achilles tendon. Complications evaluated were divided into wound complications, infections, neuritis, vascular alterations and others. Results81 ankle fractures with a posterior malleolar fragment treated by open reduction and internal fixation were identified. 20 cases were approached through the MfPM approach and 61 through the PL access. The mean follow up was 18.60 months (range 4–78 months). In the MfPM group the local complication rate was 10% (2/10 patients), both corresponding to minor wound problems which required no surgical intervention. No infection or other neural or vascular complications were found. In the PL group a complication rate of 8,19% (5/61 patients) was found, all of them corresponding to minor wound problems which required no surgical intervention. No infection or other neural or vascular complications were found. There were no significant differences between the two approaches regarding postoperative local complications (z score 0.249 - P: 0.803). ConclusionThe MfPM approach is safe and may become as readily used as the PL due to the low incidence of postoperative local complications, especially in fractures with a large fragment and posteromedial extension in which greater access to the posterior pilon can facilitate instrumentation for anatomic reduction and fixation.

The Impacts of COVID-19 on the Management of Ankle Fractures and their Outcomes: A Systematic Review

The COVID-19 pandemic is still an unresolved situation in Thailand and worldwide at large. The purpose of this study was to interpret the impacts of COVID-19 on the management of ankle fractures and their outcomes. A systematic search and review were performed in accordance with the PRISMA guideline based on the PubMed database. The search terms were ‘ankle fracture’ and ‘COVID’. From an initial search, a total of 29 abstracts were found and screened in accordance with the eligibility criteria. Then, five articles were considered eligible papers for further review. This review investigated a total of 16,813 patients with ankle fractures, including 215 patients (1.27%) who were also COVID-19-positive. According to our results, the incidence of ankle fractures showed a decrease during the pandemic. However, COVID-positive ankle fracture patients demonstrated a higher prevalence of comorbidities, including chronic kidney disease, diabetes, hypertension, and obesity. COVID-19 infection was a factor that delayed the operation and increased the length of hospital stay and adverse effects from the surgery. COVID-19 infection affected the management of ankle fractures and their outcomes in terms of negative impacts such as delayed operation, increased length of hospital stay, and increased adverse effects from the surgery. Outpatient surgery was recommended to solve some of these problems.

Tibiotalocalcaneal nail and primary closure for the management of open ankle fractures in the elderly patient; results from a major trauma centre

IntroductionOpen ankle fractures in elderly patients are challenging injuries to manage. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of elderly patients with open ankle fractures treated with a tibiotalocalcaneal nail and primary wound closure. MethodsWe identified all open ankle fractures in patients over 65 referred to our major trauma centre managed with a tibiotalocalcaneal nail and primary wound closure over 10 years. We recorded patient demographics, comorbidities, injury mechanism, length of stay, operation, weightbearing status, re-operations, infections and mortality. ResultsWe included 34 patients with an average age of 87 (73−99). We found 56 % of patients’ mobility status declined post-operatively and 21 % of patients were discharged directly home. Four patients required further unplanned surgery including two deep infections requiring amputation. We had a 6 % three month mortality rate. ConclusionUse of a tibiotalocalcaneal nail with primary wound closure offers a reasonable treatment option for open fractures of the ankle in the elderly patient.

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Between Fibula Intramedullary Nail Fixation vs Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for the Surgical Management of Unstable Ankle Fractures

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: The fundamental concept of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of unstable ankle fractures was anatomical reduction and firm fixation that allow early mobilization and rehabilitation. On the other hand, ORIF of ankle fractures is associated with complications including wound dehiscence, necrosis and infection, prominent hardware and failure. Closed reduction and intramedullary fixation (CRIF) using fibula nail was emerged as additional surgical option for unstable ankle fractures especially in elderly and medical high-risk patients. We hypothesized that fibula nailing for unstable ankle fractures would have similar functional outcomes to standard ORIF. The purpose of this study is to perform a prospective randomized study to compare clinical outcomes, bone union, and postoperative complications between ORIF and CRIF using fibula nail. Methods: A total of 59 patients (32 men, 27 women) with the mean age of 50.2 years were prospectively randomized to undergo standard ORIF or fibular nailing for unstable ankle fractures: those who underwent ORIF (31 patients 14 men, 17 women) and those who underwent CRIF using fibula nail (29 patients; 18 men and 11women). Exclusion criteria of fracture characteristics were open fracture and highly comminuted fibula fractures. Functional scoring including VAS, AOFAS and FAOS were evaluated at minimum postoperative 2 years follow up. In addition, union period, reduction status of fracture and ankle mortise at postoperative CT scan, complications including wound problem and posttraumatic arthritis were evaluated. Results: The VAS, AOFAS, and all FAOS subscales were not significantly different between two group at 2 years postoperatively (all, p&gt;0.05). Significantly fewer infections and wound complication occurred in the fibula nail group. (p &lt; 0.05; ORIF group (12.9%), fibula nail group (0%)). Postoperative at fracture site of fibula was high in fibula nail group (p &lt; 0.05; ORIF group (0%), fibula nail group (13.7%)), but there were no significant differences in the status of mortise and the rate of posttraumatic arthritis (all, p&gt;0.05). Conclusion: We concluded that the fibula nail allows acceptable reduction and secure fixation of unstable ankle fracture, with low soft tissue complication rate than ORIF. Considering the property closed reduction, the fibula nail would be an excellent treatment option for patients with unstable ankle fractures when indications is well selected

Radiographic Evaluation of Syndesmosis Stabilisation Using the TightRope System Versus Syndesmotic Screw Fixation for the Management of Ankle Fractures With a Syndesmotic Injury.

Background Ankle syndesmotic injuries represent complex orthopaedic injuries, commonly requiring open reduction and fixation. Several techniques have been described for fixation, with syndesmotic screwfixation being traditionally considered as the 'gold standard'. Among the relatively new techniques developed, the TightRope system stabilisation provides 'dynamic' stabilisation with promising results. We aimed to evaluate the radiographic performance of these two different surgical techniques in the management ofankle fractures with an underlying syndesmotic injury. Methods A total of 85 cases were included in the studyand were divided into two groups: syndesmotic screw fixation (48 cases) and TightRope system (37 cases). Patient demographics, type of ankle fracture and type of implant used were recorded for all the cases, andevaluation of the postoperative radiographs was performed for all. For all patients, the radiographic parameters assessed included the medial clear joint space (MCS), tibiofibular overlap (TFO), and anterior and posterior tibiofibular interval in order to calculate the anterior tibiofibular ratio (ATFR). Results Statistical analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in the radiographic parameters of the postoperative radiographs between the twogroups. However, in the syndesmotic screw group, a higher incidence of radiographic malreduction was seen, as indicated by the MCS and ATFR parameters, in comparison to the TightRope fixation group. An equal distribution of radiographic abnormal parameters was noted among the different types of ankle fractures included in the study (trimalleolar, bimalleolar and isolated fibula fractures with syndesmotic injury) with no obvious positive correlation noted (Pearson correlation test). Conclusion Both surgical techniques seem to provide adequate reduction of the syndesmosis, with no statistical significant differences detected from the radiographic evaluation of both groups. In our study though, the syndesmotic screw group was associated with a higher incidence of radiographic malreduction as indicated by the MCS and ATFR parameters. The TightRope system seems to have a lower rate of radiographic malreduction and provides an equally effective way of syndesmosis fixation based on a dynamic mode of stabilisation.