Numerous studies have demonstrated that the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays animportant role in the progression of chronic kidneydisease (CKD). Angiotensin (Ang) II generates intra-renal haemodynamic and inflammatory changes thatpromote proteinuria, growth of glomerular andtubular cells, inhibition of NO synthesis, stimulationof extracellular matrix synthesis and induction ofchemokines, reactive oxygen species and apoptosis[1]. In addition, in animal models of renal diseases,aldosterone is also involved in endothelial dysfunction,inflammation, proteinuria and fibrosis [2]. In clinicaltrials, treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme(ACE) inhibitors and Ang II AT1 receptor blockers(ARBs) was proved to slow down the evolution of bothdiabetic and non-diabetic nephropathies and, there-fore, it is currently regarded as the cornerstone of whatwe call ‘nephroprotection’.A controversial issue is whether these agents aresuperior to other antihypertensive drugs in terms ofnephroprotection—in other words, do they possessso-called ‘pleiotropic’ effects? A large meta-analysis [3]suggested that the benefit seen with ACE inhibitorswas related to the blood pressure (BP) decrease alone.The truth, as Sarafidis et al. [4] pointed out in a veryrecent review, is that, indeed, ACE inhibitors exhibit aBP-independent renoprotective effect, but only inpatients with proteinuria and advanced CKD(i.e. stage 3 or 4), and also that the higher the baselineurine protein excretion and its subsequent decrease, themore pronounced the beneficial effect of these drugs islikely to be [4].However, it is not sufficiently appreciated that, dueto the remarkable complexity of the RAAS, neitherACE inhibitors nor ARBs alone can completelysuppress its activity (Figure 1). The main limitationsof these agents in that regard can be summarized asfollows:(i) A substantial proportion of Ang II is generated inthe kidneys from Ang I via non-ACE pathways,such as chymase [5], which are not susceptible tothe actions of ACE inhibitors.(ii) ACE inhibition and ARB, by interrupting nega-tive feedback-loops, result in high plasma (andmost likely tissue-) renin concentrations and highplasma renin activity (PRA), which may over-come the drugs’ effectiveness. The reactivation ofAng II (or ‘Ang II escape’) has been describedwith both ACE inhibitors and ARBs [6]; how-ever, its clinical significance is not yet fullyunderstood.(iii) Renin can also bind to specific receptors in themesangium and in the subendothelium of therenal arteries. This binding leads on one hand, toa substantial increase in the catalytic efficiency ofconversion of angiotensinogen to Ang I, and, onthe other hand, to stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinases, ERK-1 and ERK-2[7]. In animal models of nephrotic syndrome,treatment with ACE inhibitors was associatedwith a reduction in glomerular injury andproteinuria, but also with tubulo-interstitiallesions [8]. These findings support a directprofibrotic role for renin, independent of itsAng-generating effect.(iv) ACE inhibitors induce an acute decrease inplasma aldosterone. This effect, however, isoften only transient and followed by a progres-sive rise in aldosterone levels that ultimately, withlong-term ACE inhibition, can reach normal oreven elevated concentrations. This ‘aldosterone
Read full abstract